Skip to content

Advertisement

Parasites & Vectors

What do you think about BMC? Take part in

Open Access

The impact of the expansion of urban vegetable farming on malaria transmission in major cities of Benin

  • Anges Yadouléton1Email author,
  • Raphael N'Guessan1, 2,
  • Hyacinthe Allagbé3,
  • Alex Asidi1,
  • Michel Boko3,
  • Razack Osse1,
  • Gil Padonou1,
  • Gazard Kindé4 and
  • Martin Akogbéto1
Parasites & Vectors20103:118

https://doi.org/10.1186/1756-3305-3-118

Received: 10 September 2010

Accepted: 12 December 2010

Published: 12 December 2010

Abstract

Background

Urban agricultural practices are expanding in several cities of the Republic of Benin. This study aims to assess the impact of such practices on transmission of the malaria parasite in major cities of Benin.

Method

A cross sectional entomological study was carried out from January to December 2009 in two vegetable farming sites in southern Benin (Houeyiho and Acron) and one in the northern area (Azèrèkè). The study was based on sampling of mosquitoes by Human Landing Catches (HLC) in households close to the vegetable farms and in others located far from the farms.

Results

During the year of study, 71,678 female mosquitoes were caught by HLC of which 25% (17,920/71,678) were Anopheles species. In the areas surveyed, the main malaria parasite, Plasmodium falciparum was transmitted in the south by Anopheles gambiae s.s. Transmission was high during the two rainy seasons (April to July and October to November) but declined in the two dry seasons (December to March and August to September). In the north, transmission occurred from June to October during the rainy season and was vehicled by two members of the An. gambiae complex: Anopheles gambiae s.s. (98%) and Anopheles arabiensis (2%).

At Houeyiho, Acron and Azèrèkè, the Entomological Inoculation Rates (EIRs) and the Human Biting Rates (HBRs) were significantly higher during the dry season in Households Close to Vegetable Farms (HCVF) than in those located far from the vegetable areas (HFVF) (p < 0.05.). However, there were no significant differences in HBRs or EIRs between HCFV and HFVF during the rainy seasons at these sites (p > 0.05).

The knock-down resistance (kdr) mutation was the main resistance mechanism detected at high frequency (0.86 to 0.91) in An. gambiae s.l. at all sites. The ace-1 R mutation was also found but at a very low frequency (< 0.1).

Conclusion

These findings showed that communities living close to vegetable farms are permanently exposed to malaria throughout the year, whereas the risk in those living far from such agricultural practices is limited and only critical during the rainy seasons. Measures must be taken by African governments to create awareness among farmers and ultimately decentralize farming activities from urban to rural areas where human-vector contact is limited.

Introduction

The geographical distribution of malaria so far described in sub-Saharan Africa is diverse. This ranged from savannah malaria, forest, highland, urban and hydro-agricultural malaria [1]. Currently, the need to investigate urban malaria has become urgent due to the resurgence of the disease and the agro-economical interest by populations in developing subsistence activities in urban and suburban areas of major cities in sub-Saharan Africa [26]. In recent studies by Robert et al. [3] and Warren et al. [7] it was shown that urbanization decreases malaria prevalence as a results of a drastic reduction in Anopheles breeding sites better access to treatment and improved (mosquito-proof) housing measures (overview in [8]). It is therefore important to emphasize the role played by urbanization in reducing malaria transmission by twofold [9]. Furthermore, agricultural activities play an important role in malaria transmission in both urban and peri-urban zones [6]. Indeed, poverty, food insecurity and malnutrition have become urban issues in sub-Saharan Africa. While meeting these challenges in cities of sub-Saharan Africa is critical, it represents a serious issue of public health [10]. Agro-economic practices involving vegetable farming is now common in many urban areas and this provides suitable breeding sites for mosquitoes with potentially higher epidemiological risk of malaria in urban than rural areas.

The general trend in practice now is that, usually non-used spaces (marshland, road edges, beaches etc) are increasingly transformed into vegetable farms comprising different kinds of crops. In Cotonou the capital city of Benin, peri-urban agriculture consists of belts of vegetable farming surrounding the city.

The advantages of urban agriculture are considerable. They contribute to improve the living conditions of citizen by supplying food, income and employment [11].

However, the economic and social value of urban and peri-urban agriculture is hindered by a number of factors including the proliferation of mosquito breeding sites. Many studies have reported the relationship between malaria and rice production, but little is known about the link between malaria transmission and urban agriculture. A recent study conducted by Robert et al. [8] has shown that vegetable farming in urban areas of Dakar, (Senegal) might not be the suitable breeding sites for larval development.

However, Matthys et al. [12] found that peri-urban agriculture created more breeding sites for Anopheles and therefore increased malaria risk in the city. An entomological study conducted in Ghana showed higher Anopheles biting rates in urban areas with agriculture compared to urban areas without such practice [13]. Another study in Kenya found no association between urban farming at household level and vector breeding sites [14].

In Benin, there are few data available that investigate the association between malaria transmission and urban vegetable farming.

The present study was conducted in three major sites of urban farming in Benin with the aim of investigating the entomological aspects of malaria transmission in relation to seasonal variations of vector populations in these areas of Benin.

Specifically, the study aimed to determine (a) the distribution of Anopheles mosquito species throughout the year at these sites, (b) their human biting pattern, (c) the infectivity rates of malaria vectors and (d) the entomological inoculation rates and malaria transmission in the three study areas.

Methods

Study area

The study was conducted in Benin, from January 2009 to December 2009 in three vegetable farms (Figure 1):
Figure 1

Map of Benin showing the three study sites.

  1. (i)

    Houeyiho in Cotonou, (economic capital city of Benin). The vegetable farm is located at 6°45'N and 2°31'E in a highly populated zone. The farm is 14-hectares in size and shared between five local cooperatives of approximately 2,000 farmers.

     
  2. (ii)

    Acron in Porto-Novo, (administrative capital city of Benin)

     
The vegetable farm is at 6°30'N and 2°47'E, at the outskirt of Porto-Novo and has the longest history of vegetable farming in the region. Initially it consisted of three hectares but has recently expanded up to 20 hectares. The number of farmers has also increased to about 150 individuals.
  1. (iii)

    Azèrèkè, Parakou. This farm is located at 9°22'N and 2°40'E at the vicinity of Parakou city, known as the Azèrèkè site. The size of this vegetable plantation is 10 hectares.

     

Agricultural practices in those farms create numerous trenches that retain rain and water from irrigation systems. These stagnant waters provide suitable breeding sites for mosquitoes, particularly Anopheles gambiae, the main malaria vector in the areas.

Field mosquito collection

Indoor collections of adult mosquitoes were carried out monthly from January to December 2009. Collections were organized in Households Close to Vegetable Farms (HCVF) and in others Far from the Farms (HFVF) where there is no agricultural practice.

Adult mosquitoes were collected using two sampling methods:
  1. (1)

    Indoor and outdoor Human Landing Catches (HLC) performed monthly over two consecutive nights (8:00 PM to 6:00 AM), in 4 randomly selected compounds;

     
  2. (2)

    Indoor Pyrethrum Spray Catches (PSC) in 4 other selected compounds; the same compounds in each sampling method being consistently used throughout the study. Collectors gave prior informed consent and received anti-malaria prophylaxis and yellow fever immunization. They were organized in teams of two for each collection point and they rotated between location within houses every two hours. Mosquitoes from HLC were used to evaluate the sporozoite infection rate of each molecular form. Knocked down mosquitoes falling on white bed sheets were preserved for identification at molecular level using PCR analysis for their resistance status as described by Martinez-Torres et al. [15]. The PSC were carried out monthly from December to January and used to establish the temporal dynamics of mosquito density and the molecular forms of An. gambiae.

     

All mosquitoes were kept separately in labelled tubes containing silica gel and frozen at -20°C for further laboratory analysis.

Laboratory processing of mosquitoes

Based on morphological characters using standard identification keys [16], all female mosquitoes referring to An. gambiae complex were identified. The head-thoraces of these females from the human landing catches were tested for the presence of CircumSporozoite Protein (CSP) of P. falciparum using enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) as per Wirtz et al. [17]. Identification of species and characterization of molecular forms within the An. gambiae complex were performed using PCR-RFLP [18].

Entomological parameters

The entomological indicators of malaria parasite transmission intensity at the sites were:
  1. (1)

    the human biting rate (HBR), which is the number of mosquitoes biting a person during a given time period (bites/p/t) (time being night, month or year);

     
  2. (2)

    the CSP rate is the proportion of mosquitoes found with Plasmodium falciparum CSP over the total number of mosquitoes tested:

     
  3. (3)

    the Entomological Inoculation Rate (EIR), expressed as the number of infective bites of anopheline per person per unit of time (bi/p/t) and calculated as the product of the HBR by the CSP rate.

     

Data analysis

An analysis of variance (ANOVA) was performed to compare the entomological estimates (HBRs, EIRs) between the seasons at the sites in the North and south Benin.

The resistance allele frequency at the kdr and Ace- 1 locus was calculated using Genepop software (version 3.3) as described by Raymond and Rousset [19].

Ethical considerations

Ethical approval for this study was granted by the Ethical Committee of the Ministry of Health in Benin. Verbal consent was asked to the head of each household for the spray catches and consent of collectors was obtained prior to HLC. In case of refusal, permission was sought from the next household.

Results

Mosquito fauna composition

A total number of 71,678 mosquitoes were collected from HLC and 29,295 from PSC at the three study sites (Table 1). The majority was Culex spp (74%). Of the remaining 26%, 97% were Anopheles gambiae s.l. and 3% were An. pharoensis, Anopheles ziemanni, and An. funestus all together.
Table 1

Mosquitoes collected by human landing catches (HLC) and pyrethrum spray catches (PSC) at the study sites.

 

Houeyiho

Acron

Azéréké

Species

HLC

PSC

HLC

PSC

HLC

PSC

Total mosquitoes caught

28,654

9,879

25,852

10,495

17,172

8,921

Total Culex Spp

20,7

8,6

19

9,1

13,2

7,4

Total Anopheles Spp

7,8

1,3

6,7

1,2

3,8

1,4

An. gambiae s.l

7,6

1,2

6,5

1,1

3,8

1,2

An. pharoensis

60

23

38

18

12

29

An. ziemanni

158

45

112

76

45

28

An. funestus

2

0

5

1

0

0

Total Aedes spp

130

34

138

61

94

78

Total Mansonia spp

23

20

54

56

15

22

Dynamic of the molecular forms

PCR species from An. gambiae s.l. collected revealed the presence of two members of An. gambiae s.l. at Azèrèkè: An. gambiae s.s., and An. arabiensis (Table 2). At Houeyiho and Acron, the entire mosquito population was An. gambiae s.s of the M molecular form throughout the year. However, at Azèrèkè, An. gambiae s.s. predominates at 85%. Despite the presence of both An. gambiae and An. arabiensis identified at Azèrèkè, the PCR analysis revealed two molecular forms in An. gambiae s.s. only, with proportions of 65% for the M and 35% for the S form.
Table 2

Summary results of PCR analysis of An. gambiae s.l. collected at the study sites.

 

PCR form

PCR Species

 

Total tested

%S

%M

% An. gambiae

% An. melas

% An. arabiensis

Houeyiho

360

-

100

100

-

-

Acron

360

-

100

100

-

-

Azèrèkè

360

65

35

85

-

15

- = Not found

Seasonal abundance and biting rates

The Annual Human Biting Rate (HBR) was estimated from the Human Landing Catches (HLC). The highest bites of An. gambiae s.l. during the rainy seasons was found in July (80 bites/p/n) in southern Benin and September (100 bites/p/n) in the northern part of the country as well (Figure 2).
Figure 2

Number of Human bites/person/night and rainfall at Houeyiho (A), Acron (B) and Azèrèkè (C) from January to December 2009.

The results from this study showed that the average HBR of An. gambiae s.l. was 10.95 bites/p/n at Houeyiho; 7.84 bites/p/n at Acron and 3.04 bites/p/n at Azèrèkè during the dry season in HCVF. These bites from HCVF were significantly higher than in HFVF at Houeyiho (2.70 bites/p/n), Acron (2.85 bites/p/n) and Azèrèkè (1.41 bites/p/n) (P < 0.05).

The human population living in HCVF received about one to five times higher bites of An. gambiae s.l. than those who lived in HFVF. However, there was no significant difference between the HBRs during the rainy season in HCFV and HFVF at Houeyiho, Acron and Azèrèkè (P > 0.05 for the three sites). The average annual HBR from January through December was significantly higher in HCVF than that from HFVF at the three sites (P < 0.05) (Table 3).
Table 3

Mean number of An. gambiae s.l. bites per person per night (Mean bi/p/n) during the seasons and annually, as determined by human landing Catches (HLC) at the study sites

 

Houeyiho

Acron

Azèrèkè

 

Dry season

Rainy season

annual

Dry season

Rainy season

annual

Dry season

Rainy season

annual

Mean bites/p/n*

10.95

42.73

9,798

7.84

37.34

8,224

3.04

23.14

6,1671

Mean bites/p/n**

2.70

22.42

4,563

2.85

19.01

4,601

1.41

17.75

3,000

P value

0.015

0.115

0.091

0.033

0.137

0.024

0.033

0.428

0.025

* = close to farms

** = far from farms

Sporozoite rate and EIR

A low percentage of Anopheles caught from the HLC (1.6%) was circumsporozoite protein positive at the three study sites. The main malaria parasite was P. falciparum transmitted by Anopheles gambiae s.l. in the southern sites surveyed. Transmission at these sites was high during the two rainy seasons (April to-July and October to November) and low during the two dry seasons (December to March and August to September) (Figure 2). In the north of the country, transmission occurred during the rainy season (June to October), with at least two members of An. gambiae s.l.: An. arabiensis (15%) and An. gambiae s.s. (85%) transmitting P. falciparum.

The EIRs were significantly higher in the dry season in HCVF at Houeyiho (0.28 bi/p/n), Acron (0.23 bi/p/n) and at Azèrèkè (0.15 bi/p/n) than in HFVF at the same sites Houeyiho (0.041 bi/p/n); Acron (0.01 bi/p/n) and Azèrèkè (0.031 bi/p/n) (P < 0.05).

The trend in average annual EIRs at the three sites was similar to that observed in the dry season, with significantly higher EIR in HCVF than in HFVF at the three sites (P < 0.05) (Table 4). However, during the rainy season, there was no significant difference between the EIRs from HCFV and HFVF (P > 0.05 for the three sites).
Table 4

Entomological Inoculation rates (EIR) recorded at the study sites

 

Houeyiho

Acron

Azèrèkè

 

Dry season

Rainy season

annual

Dry season

Rainy season

annual

Dry season

Rainy season

annual

EIR (bi/p/n)*

0.28

0.33

169.18

0.23

0.38

112.16

0.15

0.36

95.52

EIR (bi/p/n)**

0.041

0,194

64.64

0.01

0.25

65.39

0.031

0.19

39.92

P value

0.000

0.093

0.038

0.033

0.137

0.024

0.033

0.428

0.025

* = number of infective bites per person per night in households close to farms

** = number of infective bites per person per night in households far from farms

Distribution of the kdr and ace-1R mutations

An average of 30 mosquitoes from indoor resting fauna were analysed every month for the Leu-Phe kdr and ace-1 R mutations (Table 5). In southern Benin, the kdr mutation was found in all M form of An. gambiae, with a frequency of 0.89 at Acron and 0.91 at Houeyiho.
Table 5

PCR analysis of the kdr and ace-1 allelic frequency in An. gambiae s.l. collected at the study sites

  

kdr

 

ace-1

 
 

Total tested

RR

RS

SS

frequency

RR

RS

SS

frequency

Houeyiho

360

305

48

7

0.91

0

2

0

0.002

Acron

360

298

45

17

0.89

0

1

0

0.001

Azèrèkè

360

285

53

22

0.86

0

3

0

0.004

At Azèrèkè, in the north, Kdr occurred both in the M and S forms but at a higher frequency in S (75%) than M form (25%) (P < 0.05).

The ace-1 R mutation was also found at all sites surveyed but at a very low frequency. It was 0.02 at Houeyiho, 0.01 at Acron and 0.04 at Azèrèkè (Table 5).

Discussion

The findings from the present study showed a clear evidence of the dynamics of malaria transmission in urban or sub-urban areas of Benin where vegetable farming activities have grown extensively.

The abundance and fluctuations in larval and adult densities of samples collected were inherent to the environmental and ecological characteristics related to each site assessed [20].

Indeed, the diversity of anopheline species found in this study either in the south or northern part of Benin showed that apart from Anopheles gambiae s.s., the major vector of malaria parasites in West Africa, An. arabiensis should also be considered as a secondary transmitter in northern Benin though at a lesser extent. Yadouleton et al. [10] reported the presence of An. arabiensis in the Northern part of Benin at low frequency. Furthermore, within the An. gambiae complex, the S form was only found at the Azèrèkè site in the North (Sudano-guinean ecotype) while the M form was identified at Houeyiho and Acron in the coastal area of Cotonou (guinean ecotype) and the northern sub-urban areas. Corbel et al. [21] in Benin and Awolola et al. [22] in Nigeria reported that the geographical distribution correlated with the ecological or climatic factors as the M form is more adapted to the dry environment and breeds along irrigated fields than the S form which is commonly found in humid forest areas and temporary pools. The predominance of An. gambiae s.l. in the study area is consistent with its distribution throughout Africa.

The presence of higher biting rates (Figure 2) and sporozoite infective Anopheles (Table 4) in households close to vegetable farms than in those on the far side of the farms have shown that malaria parasite transmission was permanent during the year and was reinforced by the presence of breeding sites in urban vegetable farming. In fact, results from this study showed that in the three study sites, people who lived nearby the vegetable farms received during the dry season one to five times more bites than those who lived farther, but during the rainy season, there was no significant difference between HCVF and HFVF. The increased number of biting (HBR) and EIR recorded during the dry seasons in houses close to the vegetable farms compared to those far from the farms could be explained by the presence of permanent pools and puddles maintained during watering of vegetable crops.

These findings showed that communities living close to vegetable farms are permanently exposed to malaria throughout the year whereas the risk in those living far from such agricultural practices is limited and only critical during the rainy seasons.

The main mechanism conferring resistance in An. gambiae to pyrethroids (Leu-Phe kdr mutation) in West Africa was found in mosquito samples collected in different sites.

The allelic frequency of this mutation among populations collected near or far from the vegetable farms was high (> 0.90). This could be the direct consequence of the extensive use of pesticides for cotton crop protection in the south and northern Benin [23, 24] or the use of the same pesticides by local farmers against vegetable pests [10]. The gene frequency being already too high in both situations, it appeared difficult to separate the effect of the local farming practices from that of the old history of cotton production and pesticides on resistance selection in the areas surveyed. Distinguishing the impact of the two agricultural practices will require sampling and testing of mosquitoes in areas where kdr is still on its moderate form in Western Africa.

Declarations

Acknowledgements

This work was supported by the ADDRF and WHO through its TDR/RCS re-entry grant. We are grateful to villagers of Houeyiho, Acron and Azèrèke assisted in the implementation this study.

Authors’ Affiliations

(1)
Centre de Recherche Entomologique de Cotonou (CREC)
(2)
London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine
(3)
Department of Geography, Université d'Abomey-calavi
(4)
Faculté des Sciences de la Santé, Université Nationale du Bénin

References

  1. Henry MC, Roger C, Nzeyimana I, Assi SB, Dossou-Yovo J, Audilbert M, Mathonnat J, Keundjian A, Akodo E, Teuscher T, Carneval P: Inland valley rice production systems and malaria infection and disease in savannah of Côte-d'Ivoire. Trop Med Int Health. 2003, 8: 449-458. 10.1046/j.1365-3156.2003.01053.x.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. Keiser J, Utzinger J, De Castro MC, Smith TA, Tanner M, Singer BH: Urbanization in sub-Saharan Africa and implication for malaria control. Am J Trop Med Hyg. 2004, 71: 118-127.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. Robert V, MacIntyre K, Keating J, Trape JF, Duchemin JB, Warren M, Beier JC: Malaria transmission in urban sub-Saharan Africa. Am J Trop Med Hyg. 2003, 68: 169-176.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. Hay S, Guerra C, Tatem A, Atkinson P, Snow R: Urbanization, malaria transmission and disease burden in Africa. Nat Rev Microbiol. 2005, 3: 81-90. 10.1038/nrmicro1069.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. Omumbo JA, Guerra CA, Hay SI, Snow RW: The influence of urbanisation on measures of Plasmodium falciparum infection prevalence in East Africa. Acta Trop. 2005, 93: 11-21. 10.1016/j.actatropica.2004.08.010.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. Donnelly MJ, McCall PJ, Lengeler C, Bates I, D'Alessandro U, Barnish G, Konradsen F, Klinkenberg E, Townson H, Trape JF, Hastings IM, Mutero C: Malaria and urbanization in sub-Saharan Africa. Malar J. 2005, 4: 12-10.1186/1475-2875-4-12.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. Warren M, Billig P, Bendamane DB, Wijetaratne P: Malaria in urban and peri-urban areas in sub-Sahara Africa. EHP activity report. 1999, 71:Google Scholar
  8. Robert V, Awono-Ambene HP, Thioulouse J: Ecology of larval mosquitoes, with special reference to Anopheles arabiensis (Diptera: Culcidae) in market-garden wells in urban Dakar, Senegal. J Med Entomol. 1998, 35: 948-955.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. Phillips DR: Urbanization and human health. Parasitology. 1993, 106: S93-S107.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. Yadouleton AW, Asidi A, Djouaka RF, Braïma J, Agossou CD, Akogbeto MC: Development of vegetable farming: a cause of the emergence of insecticide resistance in populations of Anopheles gambiae in urban areas of Benin. Malar J. 2009, 8: 103-10.1186/1475-2875-8-103.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. PADAP: Programme d'Appui au Développement Agricole Périurbain du Sud Bénin. Rapport de l'´etude Diagnostic: demande, offre et marchés et système de production. Tome 2, Agrisud International. 2003, 148-Google Scholar
  12. Matthys B, Vounatsou P, Raso G, Tschannen AB, Becket EGG, Gosoniu L, Cisse G, Tanner M, N'Goran EK, Utzinger J: Urban farming and malaria risk factors in a medium-sized town in Cote-D'Ivoire. Am J Trop Med Hyg. 2006, 75: 1223-123.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. Eveline Klinkenberg, PJ McCall, Wilson Michael, Amerasinghe Felix, Donnelly Martin: Impact of urban agriculture on malaria vectors in Accra, Ghana. Malar J. 2008, 7: 151-10.1186/1475-2875-7-151.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  14. Keating J, Macintyre K, Mbogo C, Githeko A, Regens J, Swalm C, Ndenga B, Steiberg L, Kibe L, Githure J, Beier J: A geographic sampling strategy for studying relationships between human activity and malaria vectors in urban Africa. Am J Trop Med Hyg. 2003, 68: 357-365.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. Martinez-Torres D, Chandre F, Williamson MS, Darriet F, Berge JB, Devonshire AL, Guillet P, Pasteur N, Pauron D: Molecular characterization of pyrethroid knockdown resistance (kdr) in the major malaria vector Anopheles gambiae s.s. Insect Mol Biol. 1998, 7: 179-184. 10.1046/j.1365-2583.1998.72062.x.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. Gillies MT, De Meillon B: The Anophelinae of Africa South of the Sahara. South Africa Institute of Medical Research Johannesburg, South Africa. 1968Google Scholar
  17. Wirtz RA, Zavala F, Charoenvit Y, Campbell GH, Burkot TR, Schneider I, Esser KM, Beaudoin RL, Andre RG: Comparative testing of monoclonal antibodies against Plasmodium falciparum sporozoites for ELISA development. Bull World Health Organ. 1987, 65: 39-45.PubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. Favia G, Della Torre A, Bagayoko M, Lanfrancotti , Sagnon NF, Toure Y, Coluzzi M: Molecular identification of sympatric chromosomal forms of Anopheles gambiae and further evidence of their reproductive isolation. Insect Mol Biol. 1997, 6: 377-383. 10.1046/j.1365-2583.1997.00189.x.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. Raymond M, Rousset F: Genepop (version 1.2), a population genetics software exact tests and ecumenicism J. Heredity. 1995, 86: 248-249.Google Scholar
  20. Dossou-yovo J, Doannio JMC, Diarrassouba S, Chauvancy G: Impactd'aménagement des rizières dans la ville de Bouaké, Côte- d'Ivoire. Bull Soc Path Exot. 1998, 91: 327-333.Google Scholar
  21. Corbel V, N'Guessan R, Brengues C, Chandre F, Djogbenou L, Martin T, Akogbeto M, Hougard JM, Rowland M: Multiple insecticide resistance mechanisms in Anopheles gambiae and Culex quinquefasciatus from Benin, West Africa. Acta Trop. 2007, 101 (3): 207-216. 10.1016/j.actatropica.2007.01.005.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. Awolola TS, Brooke BD, Koekemoer LL, Coetzee M: Resistance of the malaria vector Anopheles gambiae s.s. to pyrethroid insecticides, in south-western Nigeria. Ann Trop Med Parasitol. 2002, 96: 849-852. 10.1179/000349802125002581.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. Yadouleton Anges, Padonou Gil, Asidi Alex, Moiroux Nicolas, Banganna Sahabi, Corbel Vincent, N'guessan Raphael, Gbenou Dina, Yacoubou Imorou, Gazard Kinde, Akogbeto Martin: Insecticide resistance status in Anopheles gambiae in southern Benin. Malar J. 2010, 9: 83-10.1186/1475-2875-9-83.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. Akogbéto M, Djouaka R, Noukpo H: Use of agricultural insecticides in Benin. Bull Soc Pathol Exot. 2005, 98: 400-405.PubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright

© Yadouléton et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2010

This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Comments

By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.

Advertisement