Skip to main content

Infectivity to Phlebotomus perniciosus of dogs naturally parasitized with Leishmania infantum after different treatments



In Europe most dogs with clinical leishmaniosis are treated with leishmanicides, typically antimonials combined with allopurinol and good clinical recovery is observed in a high number of these dogs. Through xenodiagnosis, the capacity of a treated animal to infect the vector of the disease under treatment is assessed as a measure of the chemotherapeutic efficacy of the drug used. The objective of the present study was to evaluate through direct xenodiagnosis the infectivity to Phlebotomus perniciosus of dogs naturally parasitized with Leishmania infantum after treatment, and to follow the clinical and parasite course of disease. Thirty two dogs with clinical leishmaniosis were assigned to one of three treatment groups: meglumine antimoniate plus allopurinol (Group A), meglumine antimoniate (Group B) or allopurinol (Group C). During the study, the dogs were examined before treatment (Day 0) and bimonthly thereafter until Day 180 (six months post-treatment onset).


The three groups were scored over time according to the effects of treatment on clinical signs and clinical-pathological variables. Significant differences in clinical scores were observed between Group A and the other two groups, indicating the combined treatment was the most effective. After treatment, bone marrow cultures were positive for the parasite in 30.8% of dogs in some of the check ups (3 or 25% in Group A, 1 or 11.1% in Group B, and 4 or 80% in Group C). Our xenodiagnosis experiments revealed that 15.4% of treated dogs were still able to infect sand flies at some point after treatment (2 dogs or 16.6% in Group A, 2 or 22.2% in Group B and none in Group C). Only 7.7% of the entire study population could infect sand flies as from the second month post-treatment onset.


The three treatment regimens tested significantly reduced the infectivity of dogs towards sand flies, thus diminishing the epidemiological risks of treated dogs both for human beings and other healthy dogs. Despite its low cure rate, the use of allopurinol after a course of leishmanicide treatment is proposed to keep dogs non-infectious during the disease transmission season (4-6 months in southern Europe).


Leishmaniosis caused by the protozoan Leishmania infantum is a severe parasitic disease that is spread to humans and animals by blood-sucking phlebotomine sand flies. Leishmaniosis is endemic in the Mediterranean basin. In Spain, the proven vectors for L. infantum are Phlebotomus perniciosus and Phlebotomus ariasi[13], the former being the main vector. Dogs are the main domestic reservoir of the parasite and play a role in human infection [4]. Notwithstanding, the epidemiological role of the cat is today a subject of intense research [510] and it has been confirmed through direct xenodiagnosis that cats presenting clinical signs of the disease are able to infect sand flies [11, 12].

Canine leishmaniosis (CanL) is today one of the most important imported canine diseases in Central Europe [13]. Estimates of CanL seroprevalence reported for Spain range from 3.7% for the Orense province in the northwest corner of the country [14] to 34.6% for the province of Málaga on the south coast [15]. In the Madrid region, a significant increase in the seroprevalence of CanL (from 5.25% to 8.1%) and the densities of both its vectors (P. perniciosus and P. ariasi) have been detected with respect to surveys conducted 15 and 17 years ago, respectively [16, 17].

Clinical CanL shows a wide spectrum of clinical signs because of the many pathogenic mechanisms involved and the particular host immune response [18]. However, in areas where the disease is endemic a large number of infected dogs are asymptomatic (clinically healthy infected dogs) [19] but remain infective to sand flies [20, 21]. An early diagnosis and effective treatment of sick dogs could help prevent the disease spreading to other dogs and/or humans.

In Europe, treatment generally consists of various dosage regimens of leishmanicides (mainly pentavalent antimonials or secondly, miltefosine) combined with allopurinol (a leishmanistatic drug) [2225]. Allopurinol has proved highly effective at maintaining successfully treated dogs in long term clinical remission. However, these treatments are of questionable efficacy because most treated dogs are clinically cured but remain infective [20, 26, 27].

To determine the epidemiologic risks of CanL, the role of the dog as a natural reservoir for L. infantum and the capacity of the sand fly vector to transmit infected forms of Leishmania need to be addressed. To date, few studies have assessed the infection capacity of treated L. infantum-parasitized dogs through xenodiagnosis [20, 26, 28, 29]. This is because the method is complex and colonies of phlebotomine vectors need to be kept in laboratory conditions throughout a complete life cycle of the insect [30, 31].

This study was designed to assess through xenodiagnosis the infection capacity of dogs naturally infected with L. infantum before and after receiving three different treatment regimes, and to examine the clinical and parasite course.



This survey was carried out at the Veterinary Teaching Hospital of the Universidad Complutense de Madrid (Madrid, Spain). The dogs selected were 32 dogs infected with L. infantum that consecutively attended the clinic. The owners of the dogs enrolled were previously informed about the study protocol.

Dogs were included in the study if they met all the following criteria:

  • at least two clinical signs consistent with CanL: asthenia and/or loss of weight, skin lesions, lymphoadenomegaly and/or splenomegaly, epistaxis - sporadic or persistent (unilateral or bilateral), ocular lesions, alterations in digestive function and/or joints.

  • a positive indirect immunofluorescence antibody test (IFAT) for leishmaniosis-specific antibodies (cut-off 1:100).

  • parasite observed in cultures of bone marrow aspirates grown in Novy-Nicolle-McNeal medium and/or promastigotes detected by direct xenodiagnosis.

Dogs with CanL were excluded if they fulfilled one of the criteria:

  • concomitant infectious or vector-borne disease.

  • pregnant or lactating female.

  • severe renal, hepatic or cardiac failure.

  • prior treatment with leishmanicides or corticosteroids.

Sample collection

Dogs were examined four times throughout the study: before treatment (Day 0) and at 60, 120, and 180 days post-treatment (dpt) onset. On Day 0, dogs underwent an electrocardiogram to rule out heart disease. At each time point, blood, urine and bone marrow samples were collected and animals were scored for 13 clinical signs assessed in a physical examination using a categorized scoring system from 0 to 2 (Table 1).

Table 1 Scoring system used for the different clinical variables assessed before and after beginning treatment

The clinical-pathological variables monitored were blood and urine data (urea, creatinine, ALT and protein electrophoresis). Additionally, the dogs were scored for 6 clinical-pathological abnormalities (Table 1). The IFAT for anti-Leishmania-specific immunoglobulin G (IgG) antibodies was performed as described previously [32] using the cut-off 1:100. Serum samples were also tested for the presence of anti-Ehrlichia canis IgG antibodies [33].

For each dog, we conducted selective culture of bone narrow aspirates on Novy-McNeal-Nicolle medium (NNN) and prepared three Giemsa-bone marrow smears to detect the presence of L. infantum amastigotes.

Treatment protocol

Dogs were assigned to one of the three treatment groups:

Group A: Meglumine antimoniate and allopurinol

  • 35 mg/kg of meglumine antimoniate given subcutaneously twice daily for 28 days.

  • 10 mg/kg of allopurinol given orally twice daily for six months.

Group B: Meglumine antimoniate

  • 35 mg/kg of meglumine antimoniate given subcutaneously twice daily for 28 days.

Group C: Allopurinol

  • 10 mg/kg of allopurinol given orally twice daily for six months.


The infectivity of dogs was assessed through direct xenodiagnosis. The local colony of P. perniciosus used in this study had been laboratory-reared at the Instituto de Salud Carlos III, Madrid [30]. The colony was kept in a chamber under controlled conditions of temperature (27-28°C), relative humidity (95-100%) and light cycle (17 hours light/7 hours dark).

Dogs were sedated by the intravenous injection of 0.5 mg/kg of medetomidine and their heads introduced into individual cube-shaped nets (50 cm wide × 50 cm high × 50 cm deep). Before treatment (Day 0) and 60, 120, and 180 dpt onset, dogs were exposed for one hour to 100 unfed, 7-day-old female sand flies released inside the nets. After one hour of exposure, the sand flies were carefully collected using a mouth aspirator. Fed flies collected from each dog were separated into individual nets (15 × 15 × 15 cm). Next the dogs were removed from their cages and intravenously administered 0.25 mg/kg of atipamezole.

Fed sand flies were kept inside the chambers for 5-7 days. Engorged females were dissected and the sand fly midgut was examined under a light microscope to detect L. infantum promastigotes.

Outcome variables

The leismanicidal efficacy of treatment was assessed by examining bone marrow cultures over time. The infection capacity of the dogs was determined through xenodiagnosis at the different time points. The clinical course of the dogs was examined in each of the treatment groups by determining two indicators: percentage reduction in clinical score and percentage reduction in clinical-pathological abnormality score. Both of these indicators were calculated as: score Day 0 - score dpt/score Day 0).

Statistical analysis

Quantitative data for the clinical signs and clinical-pathological abnormalities monitored are provided as medians and their corresponding interquartile ranges. Categorical variables are given as percentages. Baseline variables were compared among the groups using the Chi-squared test, or Fisher's exact test for categorical variables. The Kruskal-Wallis test was used to compare quantitative variables. To detect differences among groups and examine changes produced over time in the four outcome variables (leishmanicidal efficacy, infection capacity, percentage reduction in clinical signs and percentage reduction in clinical-pathological abnormalities), we constructed 4 longitudinal marginal models, one per outcome measure, using a generalized estimating equation (GEE) procedure. For leishmanicidal efficacy and infectivity to sand flies, marginal longitudinal models for binary data were used. Clinical sign and clinical-pathological abnormality percentage reductions were normalized by transforming these data into arc sen .

All analyses were performed using Stata v. 10.1 software (StataCorp LP, College Station, Texas, USA).


Table 2 shows the baseline characteristics of the dogs in the three treatment groups revealing no significant differences among them (p > 0.1). All dogs showed clinical-pathological abnormalities associated with the disease. Of the 32 dogs initially recruited, 6 were withdrawn from the study (2 from Group B and 4 from Group C) for several reasons: clinical failure, pregnancy, diabetes, intestinal obstruction, surgery or death. This left a final study population of 26 dogs; 9 females and 17 males aged from 9 months to 9 years. Of these dogs, 16 were pure breed and 10 were mongrels.

Table 2 Baseline characteristics of the dogs included in the three different treatment groups

Leishmanicidal efficacy

The results of the bone marrow cultures shown in Table 3 indicate a drop in the number of dogs positive for the parasite produced in response to treatment in all three groups. In Group A, the 8 dogs testing positive (67%) on Day 0 had dropped to 3 dogs (25%) at 180 dpt onset. In Group B, 9 dogs (100%) initially testing positive, dropping to 1 dog (11%) after 180 days of treatment and in Group C, the corresponding numbers were 4 (80%) and 1 (20%). Our marginal longitudinal models revealed the significant (p < 0.001) and similar (p > 0.1) nature of these reductions from Day 60 across all three groups.

Table 3 Bone-marrow culture and xenodiagnosis results recorded before and after starting treatment in each dog

Infectivity to sand flies

Our xenodiagnosis experiments also revealed a considerable drop in the infectivity of the differently treated dogs in all 3 groups (Table 3). Thus, in Group A, numbers of infectious dogs over the study period fell from 8 (67%) to no dogs. In Group B, numbers dropped from 6 (67%) to 1 (11%), and in Group C, from 3 (60%) to zero. Marginal models once again indicated that these reductions were both similar (p > 0.1) and significant (p < 0.001) after 60 days post-treatment onset in all three groups.

Clinical efficacy

Before the onset of treatment, the 26 dogs showed a median clinical score of 6 points. When the clinical course of disease was assessed in terms of the mean reduction in this score, significant differences were detected over time (p < 0.05) with respect to Day 0. When these reductions were compared among the groups, Group A treatment emerged as significantly more effective (p < 0.05) compared to the other two treatment regimens (Figure 1).

Figure 1

Percentage reductions in clinical signs produced in response to treatment.

Improved clinical-pathological abnormalities expressed as mean percentage reductions in scores observed indicated no significant differences (p < 0.05), improvements being observed only with respect to baseline (Day 0) scores. After treatment, significant differences were detected among the three groups such that the Group A treatment emerged as more effective (p < 0.05) than the remaining treatments (Figure 2).

Figure 2

Percentage reductions in clinicopathological abnormalities produced in response to treatment.


To date, the use of xenodiagnosis to assess the efficacy of treatment, measured as the infection capacity of treated dogs naturally infected with L. infantum, has only been reported in four studies including 4, 2, 36 and 10 dogs respectively [20, 26, 28, 29]. The present survey along with the study by Ribero et al. (2008) [28] was conducted on a sufficiently large sample size for valid conclusions to be drawn.

As may be observed in Figures 1 and 2, the most effective of our treatment regimens in terms of clinical improvement was the combined use of antimonials and allopurinol (Group A). Notwithstanding, we and other authors have noted that in some measure all treatments are able to improve the clinical condition of dogs [20, 26, 28, 29].

By examining the capacity of the dogs to infect sand flies, we observed a considerable reduction in the infectivity of the dogs in response to the three treatments tested. Only 7.7% of the entire study population was able to infect sand flies after the second month of treatment. This finding suggests that similarly treated dogs will not play a major role in promoting or maintaining new foci of disease spread.

The liposome formulation of meglumine antimoniate has been described to significantly diminish the capacity of dogs to infect Lutzomyia longipalpis five months after the end of treatment [28]. In prior work, we observed a lack of infectivity towards sand flies of 6 dogs treated with meglumine antimoniate and allopurinol for at least 4 months post-treatment onset [20]. In early studies, treatment with meglumine antimoniate was found to reduce the percentage of sand flies becoming infected after feeding on treated dogs [26, 29].

The bone marrow culture results indicate that regardless of a favorable clinical outcome of treatment, 30.8% of the dogs still showed the presence of the parasite in some of the check ups. These animals can be described as not parasitologically cured, or carriers of the parasite.

In the survey conducted in Brazil, bone marrow parasite burden was significantly reduced 4 days after the end of treatment with meglumine antimoniate [28]. In addition, it was observed that five of six dogs treated with meglumine antimoniate plus allopurinol still harbored parasites in the spleen 10 months after treatment [20].

It should be highlighted that in the treatment Group C of the present study, 80% of the dogs remained infected at the end of the study. This would appear to point to the ineffective nature of treatments based solely on allopurinol since, despite showing clinical improvement, these still infected animals could experience disease recrudescence. However, xenodiagnosis of the dogs in Group C indicated no evidence of the spread of the parasite to the phlebotomine sand flies. This finding has significant epidemiological implications in that although allopurinol may not be an effective shock treatment, it could perhaps be used in longer treatment maintenance courses (6-12 months). Notwithstanding, this should be done under supervision given the known long-term adverse effects of this agent (nephrolithiasis due to xanthine) [34, 35].

The bone marrow culture and xenodiagnostic findings indicate that by Day 180 after the onset of treatment (A, B or C), 81% of the dogs had been "cured" or the parasite had been eliminated, although in some dogs (11.1 to 25%) it persisted for a variable length of time.

In conclusion, our results highlight the need to treat sick dogs since these represent a serious epidemiological risk. Despite not being a simple method, the xenodiagnostic approach used here emerged as a useful tool to assess the infection capacity of dogs treated with new drugs and/or new treatment regimens. A reduction in infectivity to sand flies in response to treatment is a key factor to consider in control programs designed to eradicate active foci of canine leishmaniosis. In endemic areas there is a plenty of evidence indicating the effectiveness of repellents against sand flies in reducing the spread of Leishmania infection.


  1. 1.

    Lucientes Curdi J, Acedo Sánchez C, Castillo Hernández JA, Estrada Peña A: Sobre la infección natural por Leishmania en Phlebotomus perniciosus Newstead, 1911 y Phlebotomus ariasi Tonnoir, 1921, en el foco de leishmaniosis de Zaragoza. Rev Iber Parasitol. 1988, 48: 7-8.

    Google Scholar 

  2. 2.

    Martín-Sánchez J, Guilvard E, Acedo-Sánchez C, Wolf-Echeverri M, Sanchís-Marín MC, Morillas-Márquez F: Phlebotomus perniciosus Newstead, 1911, infection by various zymodemes of the Leishmania infantum complex in the Granada province (southern Spain). Int J Parasitol. 1994, 24: 405-408. 10.1016/0020-7519(94)90089-2.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. 3.

    Rioux JA, Guilvard E, Gállego J, Moreno G, Pratlong F, Portús M, Rispail P, Gállego M, Bastien P: Phlebotomus ariasi Tonnoir, 1921 et Phlebotomus perniciosus Newstead, 1911 vecteurs du complexe Leishmania infantum dans un même foyer: Infestations par deux zymodèmes syntopiques. A propos d'une enquête en Catalogne (Espagne). Leishmania Taxonomie et Phylogenèse Applications Éco-Épidemiologiques. Edited by: IMEEE. Montpellier. 1986, 439-444.

    Google Scholar 

  4. 4.

    Alvar J, Cañavate C, Molina R, Moreno J, Nieto J: Canine leishmaniasis. Adv Parasitol. 2004, 57: 1-88. full_text.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. 5.

    Ayllon T, Tesouro MA, Amusátegui I, Villaescusa A, Rodríguez-Franco F, Sainz A: Serologic and molecular evaluation of Leishmania infantum in cats from Central Spain. Ann N Y Acad Sci. 2008, 1149: 361-364. 10.1196/annals.1428.019.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. 6.

    Maia C, Nunes M, Campino L: Importance of cats in zoonotic leishmaniasis in Portugal. Vector Borne Zoonotic Dis. 2008, 8: 555-559. 10.1089/vbz.2007.0247.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. 7.

    Maia C, Nunes M, Cristovao J, Campino L: Experimental canine leishmaniasis: Clinical, parasitological and serological follow-up. Acta Trop. 2010, 116: 193-199. 10.1016/j.actatropica.2010.08.001.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. 8.

    Martín-Sánchez J, Acedo C, Muñoz-Pérez M, Pesson B, Marchal O, Morillas-Márquez F: Infection by Leishmania infantum in cats: epidemiological study in Spain. Vet Parasitol. 2007, 145: 267-273. 10.1016/j.vetpar.2006.11.005.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. 9.

    Solano-Gallego L, Rodríguez-Cortés A, Iniesta L, Quintana J, Pastor J, Espada Y, Portus M, Alberola J: Cross-sectional serosurvey of feline leishmaniasis in ecoregions around the Northwestern Mediterranean. Am J Trop Med Hyg. 2007, 76: 676-680.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. 10.

    Tabar MD, Altet L, Francino O, Sánchez A, Ferrer L, Roura X: Vector-borne infections in cats: molecular study in Barcelona area (Spain). Vet Parasitol. 2008, 151: 332-336. 10.1016/j.vetpar.2007.10.019.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. 11.

    Maroli M, Pennisi MG, Di Muccio T, Khoury C, Gradoni L, Gramiccia M: Infection of sandflies by a cat naturally infected with Leishmania infantum. Vet Parasitol. 2007, 145: 357-360. 10.1016/j.vetpar.2006.11.009.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. 12.

    da Silva SM, Rabelo PF, Gontijo Nde F, Ribeiro RR, Melo MN, Ribeiro VM, Michalick MS: First report of infection of Lutzomyia longipalpis by Leishmania (Leishmania) infantum from a naturally infected cat of Brazil. Vet Parasitol. 2010, 174: 150-154. 10.1016/j.vetpar.2010.08.005.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. 13.

    Naucke TJ, Menn B, Massberg D, Lorentz S: Sandflies and leishmaniasis in Germany. Parasitol Res. 2008, 103 (Suppl 1): S65-68. 10.1007/s00436-008-1052-y.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. 14.

    Amusátegui I, Sainz A, Aguirre E, Tesouro MA: Seroprevalence of Leishmania infantum in northwestern Spain, an area traditionally considered free of leishmaniasis. Ann N Y Acad Sci. 2004, 1026: 154-157. 10.1196/annals.1307.022.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. 15.

    Morillas F, Sánchez Rabasco F, Ocaña J, Martín-Sánchez J, Ocana-Wihelmi J, Acedo C, Sanchís-Marín MC: Leishmaniosis in the focus of the Axarquia region, Malaga province, southern Spain: a survey of the human, dog, and vector. Parasitol Res. 1996, 82: 569-570. 10.1007/s004360050164.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. 16.

    Gálvez R, Descalzo MA, Miró G, Jiménez MI, Martín O, Dos Santos-Brandao F, Guerrero I, Cubero E, Molina R: Seasonal trends and spatial relations between environmental/meteorological factors and leishmaniosis sand fly vector abundances in Central Spain. Acta Trop. 2010, 115: 95-102. 10.1016/j.actatropica.2010.02.009.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. 17.

    Gálvez R, Miró G, Descalzo MA, Nieto J, Dado D, Martín O, Cubero E, Molina R: Emerging trends in the seroprevalence of canine leishmaniosis in the Madrid region (central Spain). Vet Parasitol. 2010, 169: 327-334. 10.1016/j.vetpar.2009.11.025.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. 18.

    Solano-Gallego L, Koutinas A, Miró G, Cardoso L, Pennisi MG, Ferrer L, Bourdeau P, Oliva G, Baneth G: Directions for the diagnosis, clinical staging, treatment and prevention of canine leishmaniosis. Vet Parasitol. 2009, 165: 1-18. 10.1016/j.vetpar.2009.05.022.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. 19.

    Baneth G, Koutinas AF, Solano-Gallego L, Bourdeau P, Ferrer L: Canine leishmaniosis - new concepts and insights on an expanding zoonosis: part one. Trends Parasitol. 2008, 24: 324-330. 10.1016/

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. 20.

    Alvar J, Molina R, San Andrés M, Tesouro M, Nieto J, Vitutia M, González F, San Andrés MD, Boggio J, Rodríguez F, y col.: Canine leishmaniasis: clinical, parasitological and entomological follow-up after chemotherapy. Ann Trop Med Parasitol. 1994, 88: 371-378.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. 21.

    Molina R, Amela C, Nieto J, San-Andrés M, González F, Castillo JA, Lucientes J, Alvar J: Infectivity of dogs naturally infected with Leishmania infantum to colonized Phlebotomus perniciosus. Trans R Soc Trop Med Hyg. 1994, 88: 491-493. 10.1016/0035-9203(94)90446-4.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. 22.

    Noli C, Auxilia ST: Treatment of canine Old World visceral leishmaniasis: a systematic review. Vet Dermatol. 2005, 16: 213-232. 10.1111/j.1365-3164.2005.00460.x.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. 23.

    Mateo M, Maynard L, Vischer C, Bianciardi P, Miró G: Comparative study on the short term efficacy and adverse effects of miltefosine and meglumine antimoniate in dogs with natural leishmaniosis. Parasitol Res. 2009, 105: 155-162. 10.1007/s00436-009-1375-3.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. 24.

    Manna L, Vitale F, Reale S, Picillo E, Neglia G, Vescio F, Gravino AE: Study of efficacy of miltefosine and allopurinol in dogs with leishmaniosis. Vet J. 2009, 182: 441-445. 10.1016/j.tvjl.2008.08.009.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. 25.

    Miró G, Oliva G, Cruz I, Cañavate C, Mortarino M, Vischer C, Bianciardi P: Multicentric, controlled clinical study to evaluate effectiveness and safety of miltefosine and allopurinol for canine leishmaniosis. Vet Dermatol. 2009, 20: 397-404. 10.1111/j.1365-3164.2009.00824.x.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. 26.

    Gradoni L, Maroli M, Gramiccia M, Mancianti F: Leishmania infantum infection rates in Phlebotomus perniciosus fed on naturally infected dogs under antimonial treatment. Med Vet Entomol. 1987, 1: 339-342. 10.1111/j.1365-2915.1987.tb00364.x.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. 27.

    Travi BL, Ferro C, Cadena H, Montoya-Lerma J, Adler GH: Canine visceral leishmaniasis: dog infectivity to sand flies from non-endemic areas. Res Vet Sci. 2002, 72: 83-86. 10.1053/rvsc.2001.0527.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. 28.

    Ribeiro RR, Moura EP, Pimentel VM, Sampaio WM, Silva SM, Schettini DA, Alves CF, Melo FA, Tafuri WL, Demicheli C: Reduced tissue parasitic load and infectivity to sand flies in dogs naturally infected by Leishmania (Leishmania) chagasi following treatment with a liposome formulation of meglumine antimoniate. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2008, 52: 2564-2572. 10.1128/AAC.00223-08.

    PubMed Central  CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. 29.

    Guarga JL, Moreno J, Lucientes J, Gracia MJ, Peribanez MA, Castillo JA: Evaluation of a specific immunochemotherapy for the treatment of canine visceral leishmaniasis. Vet Immunol Immunopathol. 2002, 88: 13-20. 10.1016/S0165-2427(02)00128-9.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. 30.

    Molina R: Laboratory adaptation of an autochtonous colony of Phlebotomus perniciosus Newstead, 1911 (Diptera: Psychodidae). Reseach and Reviews in Parasitology. 1991, 51: 87-89.

    Google Scholar 

  31. 31.

    Killick-Kendrick R, Killick-Kendrick M: The laboratory colonization of Phlebotomus ariasi (Diptera: Psychodidae). Ann Parasitol Hum Comp. 1987, 62: 354-356.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. 32.

    Mancianti F, Meciani N: Specific serodiagnosis of canine leishmaniasis by indirect immunofluorescence, indirect hemagglutination, and counterimmunoelectrophoresis. Am J Vet Res. 1988, 49: 1409-1411.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. 33.

    Sainz A, Delgado S, Amusategui I, Tesouro MA, Carmenes P: Seroprevalence of canine ehrlichiosis in Castilla-Leon (north-west Spain). Preventive Veterinary Medicine. 1996, 29: 1-7. 10.1016/S0167-5877(96)01060-4.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. 34.

    Baneth G, Shaw SE: Chemotherapy of canine leishmaniosis. Vet Parasitol. 2002, 106: 315-324. 10.1016/S0304-4017(02)00115-2.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. 35.

    Ling GV, Ruby AL, Harrold DR, Johnson DL: Xanthine-containing urinary calculi in dogs given allopurinol. J Am Vet Med Assoc. 1991, 198: 1935-1940.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references


The authors are indebted to the owners of all the dogs participating in this study. Publication of the CVBD6 thematic series was sponsored by Bayer Animal Health GmbH.

Author information



Corresponding author

Correspondence to Guadalupe Miró.

Additional information

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Authors' contributions

GM and RM designed, carried out the survey, drafted the first version of the manuscript and finalized the manuscript. RG helped with the xenodiagnosis experiments and finalized the manuscript. CF helped with the study design and carried out clinical experiments. MAD performed the statistical analysis of the data. All authors reviewed the manuscript.

Authors’ original submitted files for images

Below are the links to the authors’ original submitted files for images.

Authors’ original file for figure 1

Authors’ original file for figure 2

Rights and permissions

This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Miró, G., Gálvez, R., Fraile, C. et al. Infectivity to Phlebotomus perniciosus of dogs naturally parasitized with Leishmania infantum after different treatments. Parasites Vectors 4, 52 (2011).

Download citation


  • Allopurinol
  • Bone Marrow Culture
  • Leishmania Infantum
  • Atipamezole
  • Meglumine Antimoniate