Skip to main content


We're creating a new version of this page. See preview

  • Research
  • Open Access

Zoonotic pathogens associated with Hyalomma aegyptium in endangered tortoises: evidence for host-switching behaviour in ticks?

  • 1,
  • 1,
  • 1Email author,
  • 1,
  • 1,
  • 1,
  • 1,
  • 2,
  • 1 and
  • 1
Parasites & Vectors20125:301

  • Received: 15 November 2012
  • Accepted: 23 December 2012
  • Published:



Hyalomma aegyptium is a hard-tick with a typical three-host life cycle. The main hosts are Palearctic tortoises of genus Testudo. However, other hosts can be used by immature ticks for feeding in natural conditions. Given this complex ecology and multiple host use, the circulation of pathogens by H. aegyptium between various hosts can be important from epidemiological point of view. The aim of this study was to evaluate the role of H. aegyptium as natural carrier of four important zoonotic pathogens.


From 2008 to 2011, 448 H. aegyptium ticks were collected from 45 Spur-thighed tortoises, Testudo graeca in Romania. DNA was extracted individually from each tick using a commercial kit. DNA was examined for the presence of specific sequences of Borrelia burgdorferi s.l., Anaplasma phagocytophilum, Ehrlichia canis and Coxiella burnetii by PCR, according to previously described protocols.


PCR analysis of H. aegyptium revealed the presence of A. phagocytophilum (18.8%), E. canis (14.1%) and C. burnetii (10%). 32.4% of the ticks were infected with at least one pathogen and 9.8% had co-infections. The stages most frequently infected were nymphs (50%) followed by males (33.9%) and females (27%). The number of tortoises which harboured infected ticks was 27/45 examined (60%). From all tested T. graeca, 40% harboured ticks infected with A. phagocytophilum, 46.7% had ticks infected with E. canis and 33.3% had ticks with C. burnetii. This study reports for the first time the presence of A. phagocytophilum and E. canis in H. aegyptium.


The presence and relatively high prevalence of three important zoonotic pathogens in H. aegyptium raises the question of their epidemiologic importance in disease ecology. As tortoises are unlikely to be reservoir hosts for A. phagocytophilum and E. canis and both these pathogens are common in H. aegyptium, this is an important indication for (1) a possible increased host-switching behaviour of these ticks to competent reservoir hosts (i.e. hedgehogs) and (2) transstadial transmission. Furthermore, if we consider also the presence of C. burnetii, we conclude that T. graeca and its ticks should be evaluated more seriously when assessing the eco-epidemiology of zoonotic diseases.


  • Hyalomma aegyptium
  • Testudo graeca
  • Borrelia burgdorferi s.l
  • Anaplasma phagocytophilum
  • Ehrlichia canis
  • Coxiella burnetii


Hyalomma aegyptium (Linnaeus, 1758) is a hard-tick with a typical three-host life cycle [1]. The main hosts for adults are Palearctic tortoises of the genus Testudo[2]. Hence, the distribution of this tick is restricted to the distribution of the principal hosts: Mediterranean bioregion from the Atlantic coastland of Morocco through Northern Africa, Balkan countries, Middle East, and Caucasus and steppic regions in Central Asia, Afghanistan, and Pakistan [35]. However, although rarely reported, other hosts (hedgehogs and hares) can be used by adults for feeding in natural conditions [6, 7]. Nevertheless, larvae and nymphs of H. aegyptium are less host-specific and feed on various vertebrates: tortoises, lizards, birds, small mammals and even humans [1, 810].

Given this complex ecology and multiple host use, the transmission of pathogens by H. aegyptium between reservoir hosts in natural cycles can be important from an epidemiological point of view. Determining the vectorial capacity of a tick to a certain pathogen is questionable if based only on pathogen detection (mainly by PCR), without experimental trials [11]. Several pathogens were detected in H. aegyptium: Theileria annulata[12], Borrelia turcica[13], Rickettsia spp. and Borrelia burgdorferi s.l. [14]. Experimental trials are usually long and difficult to perform, hence the need for a preliminary assessment of the carrier status in natural populations. Until now, experimental proof of the vectorial capacity of H. aegyptium was shown for several pathogens: Hemolivia mauritanica[15], Hepatozoon kisrae[16], Rickettsia aeschlimannii[17] and Coxiella burnetii[18].

In Romania, all stages of H. aegyptium were found on only two hosts, the Spur-thighed tortoise, Testudo graeca and the Northern White-breasted hedgehog, Erinaceus roumanicus and its distribution matches the one of the tortoise host [19]. Reptiles can serve as reservoirs for numerous important pathogens [20, 21]. Particularly long-living tortoises could have a potential role in long-term maintenance of natural foci of infectious diseases and their ticks can serve as vectors [22, 23]. Moreover, in the case of reptile ticks feeding occasionally on mammal hosts (i.e. in their larval and nymphal stage, as the case of H. aegyptium) studies regarding the presence of zoonotic agents are of particular interest because of the potential role of these ticks to maintain and cycle the pathogens in nature.

In Romania, there are few studies on the epidemiology and distribution of zoonotic tick-borne pathogens. In the same geographical area (Tulcea and Constanța County), Mircean et al. [24] reported dogs seropositive for A. phagocytophilum and E. canis and Majláthová et al. [21] found Ixodes ricinus ticks infected with Borrelia burgdorferi s.l. Moreover, H. aegyptium was shown to be a competent vector for C. burnetii under laboratory conditions but the natural role of this tick in the ecology of Q fever was never assessed. Hence, the aim of the present study was to evaluate the role of H. aegyptium as natural carrier of four important zoonotic pathogens: Borrelia burgdorferi sensu lato (s.l.), Anaplasma phagocytophilum, Ehrlichia canis and Coxiella burnetii.


Sample collection and study area

From 2008 to 2011, 448 engorged H. aegyptium ticks (2 larvae, 16 nymphs and 430 adults: 304 males and 126 females) were collected from Spur-thighed tortoises, Testudo graeca ibera (see Additional file 1 for details on collection sites). No other tick species were found. Tortoises were located and hand caught in their natural environment and released at the spot after tick collection. The animals were captured predominantly in the understory of sub-mediterranean xerophile oak-hornbeam (Quercus spp., Carpinus orientalis) forests (Figure 1, blue and purple spots) and dry steppe grasslands used as extensive pastures (Figure 1, red spots), with high turnover of small ruminant herding (sheep and goat). A total of 45 tortoises were collected, from 12 localities, all in Dobrogea, SE Romania. Collection was made in the active period of tortoises, from April to June. Individual tortoises were carefully inspected for ticks and all ticks were removed and collected in individual vials. Ticks were stored in ethanol at -20°C until examination. Specific identification of ticks was performed using morphological keys [25] under a binocular microscope.
Figure 1
Figure 1

Sample collection sites: Măcin Mountains (red dots), Babadag forest (blue dots) and Constanţa forests (purple dots).

DNA extraction and PCR amplification

DNA was extracted individually from each tick using a commercial DNA extraction kit (DNeasy Blood & Tissue Kit, Qiagen), according to the manufacturer’s instructions. Extracted DNA was examined for the presence of specific sequences of B. burgdorferi s.l., A. phagocytophilum and C. burnetii by standard PCR and E. canis by nested PCR, with the primers shown in Table 1, according to previously described protocols [2629]. The amplification was performed in Bio-Rad C1000TM Thermal Cycler. Aliquots of each PCR product were electrophoresed on 1.5% agarose gel stained with SYBR® Safe DNA gel stain (Invitrogen) and examined for the presence of the specific fragment under UV light (Bio-Rad BioDoc-It™ Imagine System). DNA fragment size was compared with a standard molecular weight, 100 bp DNA ladder (Fermentas). Distilled water was used as negative control.
Table 1

Targeted genes and list of primers used in this study



Primer sequence (5-3)

Size of PCR product (bp)


Positive controls

Borrelia burgdorferi s.l.



665 bp



Anaplasma phagocytophilum



420 bp


A. phagocytophilum (dog isolate)

Ehrlichia canis

16S rRNA


478 bp


E. canis (dog isolate)


389 bp

Coxiella burnetii



337 bp


105C. burnetii/ml (culture)

Statistical analysis

Frequency, prevalence and its 95% confidence interval of B. burgdorferi s.l., A. phagocytophilum, E. canis and C. burnetii DNA and respective co-infections in H. aegyptium were established. These parameters were determined according to sex and developmental stage of the ticks (males, females, nymphs and larvae) and geographic location. The difference of prevalence among groups was statistically analysed by chi-squared independence. A p value of <0.05 was statistically significant. All statistical analyses were performed using the EpiInfo 2000 software.


PCR analysis of H. aegyptium revealed the presence of three pathogens (A. phagocytophilum, E. canis and C. burnetii) from the four tested (no samples were positive for B. burgdorferi s.l.). From the total number of ticks examined, 145 were infected with at least one pathogen (32.4%; 145/448; CI 95%: 28.1-36.9). The frequency and prevalence of each detected pathogen are shown in Table 2. The highest molecular prevalence was detected for A. phagocytophilum (18.8%), followed by E. canis (14.1%) and C. burnetii (10%). The developmental stages most frequently infected with at least one pathogen were nymphs (50%; 8/16; CI 95%: 24.7-75.3) followed by adult males (33.9%; 103/304; CI 95%: 28.6-39.5) and females (27%; 34/126; CI 95%: 19.5-35.6).
Table 2

Prevalence of A. phagocytophilum, E. canis and C. burnetii DNA in H. aegyptium collected from T. graeca


Anaplasma phagocytophilum

Ehrlichia canis

Coxiella burnetii

PCR positives/all tested

Prevalence % (CI 95%)

PCR positives/all tested

Prevalence % (CI 95%)

PCR positives/all tested

Prevalence % (CI 95%)



0 (0.0-84.2)


0 (0.0-84.2)


0 (0.0-84.2)



50 (24.7-75.3)


0 (0.0-20.6)


12.5 (1.6-38.3)



0 (0.0-2.9)


15.9 (10.0-23.4)


15.1 (9.3-22.5)



25 (20.3-30.3)


14.1 (10.5-18.7)


7.9 (5.2-11.7)



18.8 (15.3-22.7)


14.1 (11.0-17.7)


10 (7.5-13.3)

The prevalence of the co-infections was 9.8% (44/448; CI 95%: 7.3-13.1). The prevalence of co-infections was higher in nymphs (12.5%; 2/16; CI 95%: 1.6-38.3) and males (12.2%; 37/304; CI95%: 8.8-16.5) than in other developmental stages (p < 0.00001). The only region where co-infected ticks were found was Măcin Mountains, with 10.9% from the total number of ticks (36/330; CI 95%: 7.9-14.9). The most frequent co-infection type was A. phagocytophilum-E. canis (43.2%; 19/44; CI 95%: 28.3-59.0), followed by A. phagocytophilum-C. burnetii (38.6%; 17/44, CI 95%: 24.4-54.5).

The number of tortoises which harboured infected ticks (regardless the pathogen) was 27 out of 45 examined (60%; CI 95%: 44.3-74.3). From all tested T. graeca, 18 (40%) harboured ticks infected with A. phagocytophilum, 21 (46.7%) had ticks infected with E. canis and 15 (33.3%) had ticks with C. burnetii. Interestingly, from the 27 tortoises which harboured infected ticks, 18 had ticks infected independently or co-infected with at least two pathogens (Table 3).
Table 3

Number of Testudo graeca which harboured ticks infected with pathogens (independent infection of ticks with one or more pathogens, but on the same host)










No. tortoises









Legend: A - Anaplasma phagocytophilum; E - Ehrlichia canis; C - Coxiella burnetii.


Ticks are vectors of important pathogens of humans and animals and serve as indicators of infection in nature [30]. The geographical distribution and habitats of several generalist tick species have expanded in the recent years. Major drivers for this trend include land use, climate changes and globalization [31, 32]. On the other hand, for certain tick species which are co-distributed with their endangered hosts, like the case of H. aegyptium, the trend is a decreasing geographical range [2]. However, in general, a decrease in the availability of natural host populations could lead to host-switching behaviour [33]. As H. aegyptium is reported to alternatively feed on various other hosts, mainly during their pre-imaginal stages, evaluation of its zoonotic pathogen burden is of particular interest.

Regarding their role in the ecology of zoonotic infectious diseases, tortoises and their ticks have received significantly less attention compared to mammals and birds. Among small mammals, hedgehogs (Erinaceus spp.) are important mainly in synanthropic environments as reservoir hosts for important human pathogens like A. phagocytophilum, Babesia spp. [34] or B. burgdorferi s.l. [35]. As H. aegyptium occasionally feeds on hedgehogs and it can potentially attack humans [10], the evaluation of this species as a carrier host for zoonotic pathogens is important.

For B. burgdorferi s.l., the main vectors are ticks of genus Ixodes and the reservoir hosts, mostly small mammals [36]. Although in this survey there were no H. aegyptium positive for the Lyme disease agent, some other studies reported that this tick can feed on reservoir hosts of Borrelia lusitaniae[37]. The role of reptiles in the ecology of B. lusitaniae was shown in the past by several authors [38, 39]. Borrelia burgdorferi s.l. is one of the most extensively studied tick-borne pathogens in the world. Hence, there were numerous experimental trials for assessing the vectorial capacity of various ticks. So far, experimental data suggest that only ticks of genus Ixodes are competent vectors for the Lyme disease spirochetes [40]. However, Kar et al. [14] found B. burgdorferi s.l. in two out of 28 pools of H. aegyptium collected from Testudo graeca in Turkey. In the present study no ticks were positive for this pathogen, supporting the hypothesis that ticks other than Ixodes spp. should not be assumed to serve as bridging vectors for B. burgdorferi s.l. or to play any role in the maintenance of these spirochetes in natural cycles [40].

Anaplasma phagocytophilum, the agent of human granulocytic anaplasmosis, is vectored in Europe by Ixodes ricinus and can infect a wide range of domestic and wild vertebrate hosts, including rodents, horses, dogs and humans [41]. This is the first report of A. phagocytophilum in H. aegyptium ticks. The relatively high prevalence of A. phagocytophilum in this study (18.8%) in fully engorged H. aegyptium collected from tortoises can be theoretically caused by two factors: (1) the infection was acquired by ticks during an earlier developmental stage feeding on competent reservoir hosts or (2) tortoises are competent reservoir hosts. The second hypothesis is less probable, as several studies showed that reptiles are not competent reservoir hosts for this pathogen [42, 43]. Moreover, surveillance of other ticks parasitic on reptiles yielded negative results [44]. Prevalence of Anaplasma spp. in engorged Hyalomma lusitanicum and H. marginatum collected on domestic mammals in Sicily was much lower (~1%) [45]. All these data (improbable reservoir role of tortoises and relatively high prevalence), suggest that H. aegyptium is able to transstadially pass in A. phagocytophilum. However, the probable lack of transovarial transmission of A. phagocytophilum in ticks [46] confers little eco-epidemiological importance to this vector-pathogen association.

The genus Ehrlichia includes five species [47], but only E. canis is found in Europe. This study reports the presence of E. canis for the first time in H. aegyptium, with a noteworthy prevalence. The only recognized vector for E. canis is Rhipicephalus sanguineus. In Romania, the distribution range of H. aegyptium overlaps with the distribution of R. sanguineus[19]. Although R. sanguineus feeds mainly on dogs [48], in Romania, it has been found also on hedgehogs (E. roumanicus) [19]. This is indicative of a possible cross transmission of E. canis from R. sanguineus to H. aegyptium using hedgehogs as bridging hosts.

The Q fever agent, C. burnetii was present only in Măcin Mountains with a relatively high prevalence in ticks (37.9%). An interesting aspect in this area was that all tortoises harbouring C. burnetii-infected ticks had also A. phagocytophilum-infected ticks and 72.7% of these tortoises had ticks infected with E. canis, too. Additionally, out of the 11 tortoises infested with C. burnetii-infected ticks, 10 (90.9%) had co-infected ticks. Q fever affects a wide range of domestic and free living mammals, birds, reptiles, fish, and arthropods, as well as humans [49, 50]. The etiological agent of Q fever, C. burnetii, has been identified in over 40 tick species [50, 51]. Hyalomma aegyptium was shown to have an unquestionable potential in the epidemiology of Q fever natural foci [18]. Ticks transmit C. burnetii vertically (transstadially and transovarially) and horizontally (by biting, via saliva) [52] but also through their faeces [53]. Sharing of pastures by tortoises and domestic ruminants was suggested by Široký et al. [18] to have an important role in the natural cycle, especially if considering that tortoises maintain natural foci of Q fever by hosting long-term infected ticks [18].

We found a marked dissimilarity between the occurrences of individual pathogens in ticks among the different locations: Anaplasma phagocytophilum and E. canis being found in all three locations while C. burnetii was only present in one. This variance may be caused by the different habitat associations and its host-fauna composition. The two forested sample sites have high occurrence rates of small mammals, especially hedgehogs, while the third location is primarily used by small domestic ruminants [54]. Coxiella burnetii is commonly reported in sheep and goats [55], hence its occurrence is more likely in the later habitat. This is consistent with the present findings. Moreover, the local agricultural practice (i.e. high turnover rate of domestic herds on extensive used pastures) in this region provides chances for a continuous presence of this pathogen in the environment [56].


The presence and relatively high prevalence of three important zoonotic pathogens in H. aegyptium raises the question of their epidemiologic importance in disease ecology. As tortoises are unlikely reservoir hosts for A. phagocytophilum and E. canis and both these pathogens are common in H. aegyptium, this is an important indication for (1) a possible increased host-switching behaviour of these ticks to competent reservoir hosts (i.e. hedgehogs) and (2) transstadial transmission. Furthermore, if considering also the presence of C. burnetii, it can be concluded that T. graeca and its ticks should be evaluated more seriously when assessing the eco-epidemiology of zoonotic diseases.



The publication of this paper was supported from grant IDEI-PCCE CNCSIS 84, 7/2010. We also want to thank the Administration of Măcin Mountains Natural Park for issuing the research permits. We are indebted to Cristian Domşa for creating the map. Special thanks to Nikola Pantchev (IDEXX Vet Med Labor, Germany) for providing positive controls of A. phagocytophilum and E. canis.

Authors’ Affiliations

Department of Parasitology and Parasitic Diseases, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, University of Agricultural Sciences and Veterinary Medicine Cluj-Napoca, Calea Mănăștur 3-5, Cluj-Napoca, 400372, Romania
Department of Microbiology and Parasitology, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, University of Thessaly, Trikalon 224, PO Box 199, Karditsa, 43100, Greece


  1. Apanaskevich DA: Host–parasite relationships of the genus Hyalomma Koch (Acari, Ixodidae) and their connection with microevolutionary processes. Parazitologiya. 2004, 38: 515-523. in RussianGoogle Scholar
  2. Mihalca AD, Gherman CM, Cozma V: Coendangered hard-ticks: threatened or threatening?. Parasit Vectors. 2011, 4: 71-10.1186/1756-3305-4-71.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. Kolonin GV: Mirovoe rasprostranenie iksodovykh kleshchey. Rody Hyalomma, Aponomma, Amblyomma [World distribution of ixodid ticks. Genera Hyalomma, Aponomma, Amblyomma]. 1983, Moskva, SSSR: Nauka, in RussianGoogle Scholar
  4. Apanaskevich DA: K diagnostike vida Hyalomma (Hyalomma) aegyptium (Acari, Ixodidae) [To diagnostics of Hyalomma (Hyalomma) aegyptium (Acari: Ixodidae)]. Parazitologiya. 2003, 37: 47-59. in RussianGoogle Scholar
  5. Široký P, Petrželková KJ, Kamler M, Mihalca AD, Modrý D: Hyalomma aegyptium as dominant tick in tortoises of the genus Testudo in Balkan countries, with notes on its host preferences. Exp Appl Acarol. 2006, 40: 279-290.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. Hoogstraal H: African Ixodoidea. I. Ticks of the Sudan. 1956, Washington, DC, USA: Department of the navy, bureau of medicine and surgeryView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  7. Hoogstraal H, Kaiser MN: Some host relationships of the tortoise tick.Hyalomma (Hyalommasta) aegyptium(L.) (Ixodoidea, Ixodidae) in Turkey. Ann Entomol Soc Am. 1960, 53: 457-458.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  8. Kolonin GV: Reptiles as hosts of ticks. Russ J Herp. 2004, 11: 177-180.Google Scholar
  9. Vatansever Z, Gargili A, Aysul NS, Sengoz G, Estrada-Peña A: Ticks biting humans in the urban area of Istanbul. Parasitol Res. 2008, 102: 551-553. 10.1007/s00436-007-0809-z.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. Bursali A, Tekin S, Orhan M, Keskin A, Ozkan M: Ixodid ticks (Acari: Ixodidae) infesting humans in Tokat Province of Turkey: species diversity and seasonal activity. J Vector Ecol. 2010, 35: 180-186. 10.1111/j.1948-7134.2010.00075.x.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. De Sousa R, Lopes De Carvalho I, Santos AS, Bernardes C, Milhano N, Jesus J, Menezes D, Núncio MS: Role of the lizard Teira dugesii as a potential host for Ixodes ricinus tick-borne pathogens. Appl Environ Microbiol. 2012, 78: 3767-3769. 10.1128/AEM.07945-11.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. Ray HN: Hereditary transmission of Theileria annulata infection in the tick, Hyalomma aegyptium Neum. Trans R Soc Trop Med Hyg. 1950, 44: 93-104. 10.1016/0035-9203(50)90074-5.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. Güner ES, Watanabe M, Hashimoto N, Kadosaka T, Kawamura Y, Ezaki T, Kawabata H, Imai Y, Kaneda K, Masuzawa T: Borrelia turcica sp. nov., isolated from the hard tick Hyalomma aegyptium in Turkey. Int J Sys Evol Micr. 2004, 54: 1649-1652. 10.1099/ijs.0.03050-0.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  14. Kar S, Yılmazer N, Midilli K, Ergin S, Alp H, Gargılı A: Presence of the zoonotic Borrelia burgdorferi s.l. and Rickettsia spp. in the ticks from wild tortoises and hedgehogs. J Marmara Univ Inst Health Sci. 2011, 1: 166-170.Google Scholar
  15. Sergent ED, Sergent ET: Sur une hémogrégarine, parasite de Testudo mauritanica. C R Soc Biol. 1904, 56: 130-131.Google Scholar
  16. Paperna I, Kremer-Mecabell T, Finkelman S: Hepatozoon kisrae n. sp. infecting the lizardAgama stelliois transmitted by the tickHyalommacf.aegyptium. Parasite. 2002, 9: 17-27.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. Bitam I, Kernif T, Harrat Z, Parola P, Raoult D: First detection of Rickettsia aeschlimannii in Hyalomma aegyptium from Algeria. Clin Microbiol Infect. 2009, 15: 253-254.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. Široký P, Kubelová M, Modrý D, Erhart J, Literák I, Špitalská E, Kocianová E: Tortoise tick Hyalomma aegyptium as long term carrier of Q fever agent Coxiella burnetii - evidence from experimental infection. Parasitol Res. 2010, 107: 1515-1520. 10.1007/s00436-010-2037-1.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. Mihalca AD, Dumitrache MO, Magdaş C, Gherman CM, Domşa C, Mircean V, Ghira IV, Pocora V, Ionescu DT, Sikó Barabási S, Cozma V, Sándor AD: Synopsis of the hard ticks (Acari: Ixodidae) of Romania with update on host associations and geographical distribution. Exp Appl Acarol. 2012, 58: 183-206. 10.1007/s10493-012-9566-5.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. Yadav MP, Sethi MS: Poikilotherms as reservoirs of Q-fever (Coxiella burnetii) in Uttar Pradesh. J Wildl Dis. 1979, 15: 15-17.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. Majláthová V, Majláth I, Hromada M, Tryjanowski P, Bona M, Antczak M, Víchová B, Dzimko S, Mihalca A, Pet’ko B: The role of the sand lizard (Lacerta agilis) in the transmission cycle of Borrelia burgdorferi sensu lato. Int J Med Microbiol. 2008, 298: 161-167.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  22. Peter TF, Burridge MJ, Mahan SM: Competence of the African tortoise tick, Amblyomma marmoreum (Acari: Ixodidae), as a vector of the agent of heartwater (Cowdria ruminantium). J Parasitol. 2000, 86: 438-441.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. Široký P, Kamler M, Modry D: Long-term occurrence of Hemoliviacf.mauritanica(Apicomplexa: Adeleina: Haemogregarinidae) in captiveTestudo marginata (Reptilia: Testudinidae): Evidence for cyclic merogony? . J Parasitol. 2004, 90: 1391-1393. 10.1645/GE-3306.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. Mircean V, Dumitrache MO, Györke A, Pantchev N, Jodies R, Mihalca AD, Cozma V: Seroprevalence and geographic distribution of Dirofilaria immitis and tick-borne infections (Anaplasma phagocytophilum, Borrelia burgdorferi sensu lato, and Ehrlichia canis) in dogs from Romania. Vector Borne Zoonotic Dis. 2012, 12: 595-604. 10.1089/vbz.2011.0915.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  25. Feider Z: Fauna RPR. Arachnida. Vol V. Fasc 2. 1965, Bucureşti: Academiei RPR, in RomanianGoogle Scholar
  26. Pleyer U, Priem S, Bergmann L, Burmester G, Hartmann C, Krause A: Detection of Borrelia burgdorferi DNA in urine of patients with ocular Lyme borreliosis. Br J Ophthalmol. 2001, 85: 552-555. 10.1136/bjo.85.5.552.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  27. Courtney JW, Kostelnik LM, Zeidner NS, Massung RF: Multiplex Real-Time PCR for Detection of Anaplasma phagocytophilum and Borrelia burgdorferi. J Clin Microbiol. 2004, 42: 3164-3168. 10.1128/JCM.42.7.3164-3168.2004.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  28. Alsaleh A, Pellerin JL, Rodolakis A, Larrat M, Cochonneau D, Bruyas JF, Fieni F: Detection of Coxiella burnetii, the agent of Q fever, in oviducts and uterine flushing media and in genital tract tissues of the non pregnant goat. Comp Immunol Microb. 2011, 34: 355-360. 10.1016/j.cimid.2011.05.002.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  29. Rotondano TE, de Almeida AM, Lustosa EM, Cordeiro AA, Camboim EK, de Azvedo SS, de Andrade PP, de Melo MA: An assessment of whole blood and fractions by nested PCR as a DNA source for diagnosing canine ehrlichiosis and anaplasmosis. Scientific World Journal. 2012, 2012: 605743-PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  30. Rizzoli A, Hauffe HC, Carpi G, Vourc’h GI, Rosa R, Neteler M: Lyme borreliosis in Europe. Euro Surveill. 2011, 16: 1-8.Google Scholar
  31. Gubler DJ, Reiter P, Ebi KL, Yap W, Nasci R, Patz JA: Climate variability and change in the United States: potential impacts on vector and rodent-borne diseases. Environ Health Perspect. 2001, 109: 223-233.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  32. Harrus S, Baneth G: Drivers for the emergence and re-emergence of vector-borne protozoal and bacterial diseases. Int J Parasitol. 2005, 35: 1309-1318. 10.1016/j.ijpara.2005.06.005.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  33. Keesing F, Belden LK, Daszak P, Dobson A, Harvell CD, Holt RD, Hudson P, Jolles A, Jones KE, Mitchell CE, Myers SS, Bogich T, Ostfeld RS: Impacts of biodiversity on the emergence and transmission of infectious diseases. Nature. 2010, 468: 647-652. 10.1038/nature09575.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  34. Silaghi C, Woll D, Hamel D, Pfister K, Mahling M, Pfeffer M: Babesia spp. andAnaplasma phagocytophilum in questing ticks, ticks parasitizing rodents and the parasitized rodents - Analyzing the host-pathogen-vector interface in a metropolitan area. Parasit Vectors. 2012, 5: 191-10.1186/1756-3305-5-191.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  35. Skuballa J, Petney T, Pfäffle M, Oehme R, Hartelt K, Fingerle V, Kimmig P, Taraschewski H: Occurrence of different Borrelia burgdorferi sensu lato genospecies including B. afzelii, B. bavariensis, and B. spielmanii in hedgehogs (Erinaceus spp.) in Europe. Ticks Tick Borne Dis. 2012, 3: 8-13. 10.1016/j.ttbdis.2011.09.008.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  36. Jaenson TGT, Hjertqvist M, Bergström T, Lundkvist Å: Why is tick-borne encephalitis increasing? A review of the key factors causing the increasing incidence of human TBE in Sweden. Parasit Vectors. 2012, 5: 184-10.1186/1756-3305-5-184.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  37. De Michelis S, Sewell HS, Collares-Pereira M, Santos-Reis M, Schouls LM, Benes V, Holmes EC, Kurtenbach K: Genetic diversity of Borrelia burgdorferi sensu lato in ticks from mainland Portugal. J Clin Microbiol. 2000, 38: 2128-2133.PubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  38. Ekner A, Dudek K, Sajkowska Z, Majláthová V, Majláth I, Tryjanowski P: Anaplasmataceae andBorrelia burgdorferisensulato in the sand lizardLacerta agilis and co-infection of these bacteria in hostedIxodes ricinusticks. Parasit Vectors. 2011, 4: 182-10.1186/1756-3305-4-182.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  39. Tijsse-Klasen E, Fonville M, Reimerink JHJ, van der Sluijs Spitzen A, Sprong H: Role of sand lizards in the ecology of Lyme and other tick-borne diseases in the Netherlands. Parasit Vectors. 2010, 3: 42-10.1186/1756-3305-3-42.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  40. Eisen L, Lane RS: Vectors of Borrelia burgdorferi sensu lato. Lyme Borreliosis: Biology, Epidemiology and Control. 2002, Wallingford, Oxon, UK: CABI Publishing, 91-115.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  41. Alleman AR, Wamsley HL: An update on anaplasmosis in dogs. Vet Med. 2008, 103: 212-220.Google Scholar
  42. Smrdel KS, Serdt M, Duh D, Knap N, Zupanc TA: Anaplasma phagocytophilum in ticks in Slovenia. Parasit Vectors. 2010, 3: 102-10.1186/1756-3305-3-102.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  43. Nieto NC, Foley JE, Bettaso J, Lane RS: Reptile infection with Anaplasma phagocytophilum, the causative agent of granulocytic anaplasmosis. J Parasitol. 2009, 95: 1165-1170. 10.1645/GE-1983.1.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  44. Nowak M, Cieniuch S, Stańczak J, Siuda K: Detection of Anaplasma phagocytophilum in Amblyomma flavomaculatum ticks (Acari: Ixodidae) collected from lizard Varanus exanthematicus imported to Poland. Exp Appl Acarol. 2010, 51: 363-371. 10.1007/s10493-009-9332-5.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  45. Torina A, Alongi A, Scimeca S, Vicente J, Caracappa S, de la Fuente J: Prevalence of tick-borne pathogens in ticks in Sicily. Transbound Emerg Dis. 2010, 57: 46-48. 10.1111/j.1865-1682.2010.01101.x.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  46. Severinsson K, Jaenson TG, Pettersson J, Falk K, Nilsson K: Detection and prevalence of Anaplasma phagocytophilum and Rickettsia helvetica in Ixodes ricinus ticks in seven study areas in Sweden. Parasit Vectors. 2010, 3: 66-10.1186/1756-3305-3-66.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  47. Rikihisa Y: The tribe Ehrlichieae and ehrlichial diseases. Clin Microbiol Rev. 1991, 4: 286-308.PubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  48. Torres FD: Biology and ecology of the brown dog tick,Rhipicephalus sanguineus. Parasit Vectors. 2010, 3: 26-10.1186/1756-3305-3-26.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  49. Maurin M, Raoult D: Q fever. Clin Microbiol Rev. 1999, 12: 518-553.PubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  50. Kazar J: Coxiella burnetii infection. Ann N Y Acad Sci. 2005, 1063: 105-114. 10.1196/annals.1355.018.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  51. Psaroulaki A, Ragiadakou D, Kouris G, Papadopoulos B, Chaniotis B, Tselentis Y: Ticks, tick-borne Rickettsiae, and Coxiella burnetii in the Greek Island of Cephalonia. Ann N Y Acad Sci. 2006, 1078: 389-399. 10.1196/annals.1374.077.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  52. Řeháček J, Brezina R: Detection of Coxiella burnetii in saliva of experimentally infected ticks, Hyalomma dromedarii Koch. Bull World Health Organ. 1968, 39: 974-977.PubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  53. Hirai K, To H: Advances in the understanding of Coxiella burnetii infection in Japan. J Vet Med Sci. 1998, 60: 781-790. 10.1292/jvms.60.781.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  54. Murariu D: Mammal ecology and distribution from North Dobrogea (Romania). Travaux du Muséum National d’Histoire Naturelle «Grigore Antipa». 2006, 49: 387-399.Google Scholar
  55. Van den Brom R, Moll L, van Schaik G, Vellema P: Demography of Q fever seroprevalence in sheep and goats in The Netherlands in 2008. Prev Vet Med. in pressGoogle Scholar
  56. Ardeleanu D, Neacşu GM, Pivoda CA, Enciu A: Poliparasitism structure in small ruminants in Dobrogea. Bull Univ Agri Sci Vet Med, Vet Med Book Ser. 2003, 60: 28-32. in RomanianGoogle Scholar


© Paștiu et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2012

This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.


By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate. Please note that comments may be removed without notice if they are flagged by another user or do not comply with our community guidelines.