Bendiocarb resistance in Anopheles gambiae s.l. populations from Atacora department in Benin, West Africa: a threat for malaria vector control
© Aïkpon et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2013
Received: 29 May 2013
Accepted: 22 June 2013
Published: 26 June 2013
Owing to pyrethroid resistance in An. gambiae, the carbamate and organophosphate insecticides are currently regarded as alternatives or supplements to pyrethroids for use on mosquito net treatments. Resistance monitoring is therefore essential to investigate the susceptibility of An. gambiae s.l to these alternative products.
Two to three day old adult female Anopheles mosquitoes were reared from larvae collected in the five districts (Kouandé, Natitingou, Matéri, Péhunco, Tanguiéta) of the Atacora department. Mosquitoes were then exposed to WHO impregnated papers. The four treatments consisted of: carbamates (0.1% bendiocarb, 0.1% propoxur) and organophosphates (0.25% pirimiphosmethyl, 1% fenitrothion). PCR assays were run to determine the members of the An. gambiae complex, the molecular forms (M) and (S), as well as phenotypes for insensitive acetylcholinesterase (AChE1) due to ace-1 R mutation.
Bioassays showed bendiocarb resistance in all populations of An. gambiae s.s. tested. Propoxur resistance was observed in Matéri, Péhunco and Tanguiéta, while it was suspected in Kouandé and Natitingou. As for the organophosphates, susceptibility to pirimiphos-methyl was assessed in all populations. Fenitrothion resistance was detected in Kouandé, Péhunco and Tanguiéta, while it was suspected in Matéri and Natitingou. The S-form was predominant in tested samples (94.44%). M and S molecular forms were sympatric but no M/S hybrids were detected. The ace-1 R mutation was found in both S and M molecular forms with frequency from 3.6 to 12%. Although the homozygous resistant genotype was the most prevalent genotype among survivors, the genotypes could not entirely explain the bioassay results.
Evidence of bendiocarb resistance in An. gambiae populations is a clear indication that calls for the implementation of insecticide resistance management strategies. The ace-1 R mutation could not entirely explain the resistance to bendiocarb observed and is highly suggestive of involvement of other resistance mechanisms such as metabolic detoxification.
KeywordsBendiocarb resistance Anopheles gambiae Threat Malaria vector control Benin
Malaria is a major public health problem and Anopheles gambiae is one of the major vectors of this disease in sub-Saharan Africa . The current effective vector control tools include the use of Long Lasting Insecticide Nets (LLIN) and Indoor Residual Spraying (IRS) . In sub-Sahara Africa and southern Asia, these two methods have shown good results [3, 4].
Pyrethroids are the only group of insecticides currently recommended for net treatment, the others (organochlorine, carbamate and organophosphate) are applied for IRS [5, 6]. The main problem with ITNs and IRS is the development of insecticide resistance, particularly pyrethroid-resistance by several populations of Anopheles gambiae[7–10]. Prior to the present study, a monitoring survey was carried out on pyrethroid resistance from January to October 2012 in the department of Atacora and showed a high level of kdr allelic frequency of 81.78% on average. The kdr mutation was found in both S (92.02%) and M (30.25%) molecular forms (Aïkpon, personal communication). More recently, the emergence of resistance in populations of An. gambiae to common classes of insecticides used in public health has been reported in many countries in Africa, including Côte d’Ivoire [7, 11], Kenya , Benin [13, 14], Niger , Burkina Faso , Mali , Nigeria [18, 19], South Africa  and Cameroon .
With the widespread resistance to pyrethroids, the carbamate class of insecticides is one of the possible alternatives that can be considered effective enough to combat pyrethroid-DDT resistance, mainly because of its different mode of action. For this reason, Benin Republic adopted a national malaria control strategy based on large-scale integrated control measures, which included Insecticide Treated Nets (ITNs) and Indoor Residual Spraying (IRS) using bendiocarb, a carbamate insecticide. The department of Atacora has housed a large scale IRS campaign since 2011. However, there is not sufficient information on the resistance status of carbamate insecticides in the field populations of An. gambiae s.l. in North West Benin.
The aim of this study is to provide information on the susceptibility status of An. gambiae s.l. to carbamate that has been used in vector control in Benin and also to investigate the possibility of co-resistance with organophosphates in the same population of An. gambiae s.l.. It is hoped that findings from this study will promote and improve effective vector control decision making.
Anopheles gambiae s.l. larvae were collected in 5 districts and in each district, four villages were selected randomly. At each locality chosen, Anopheline larvae were collected from various natural breeding sites including ground pools, gutters, puddles and abandoned potholes, during the rainy season from July to October 2012. Water was scooped using a plastic scoop and poured into small transparent plastic bowls. A strainer was used to sieve and pool together the third and fourth instar larvae in order to have sufficient adult emergence of the same physiological age. The mosquito larvae collected were transported in well labeled plastic bottles to the laboratory of the Centre de Recherche Entomologique de Cotonou, Benin (CREC) where they were maintained at 28 ± 2 C and 72 ± 5% relative humidity. A laboratory susceptible strain of An. gambiae Kisumu was used as a reference strain to compare the susceptibility levels of the field populations.
Insecticide susceptibility tests
Mosquitoes collected were assayed using WHO discriminating dosages with four insecticides of technical grade quality: two carbamates (0.1% bendiocarb, 0.1% propoxur) and two organophosphates (0.25% pirimiphos méthyl, 1% fenitrothion). Four batches of 25 unfed females, aged 2–5 days, were exposed to the diagnostic doses of insecticide treated papers for 60 min at 27 ± 1°C and 80% relative humidity. The twenty-five females of An. gambiae were introduced into each tube and monitored at different time intervals (10, 15, 20, 30, 45, 60 minutes), the number “knocked-down” were recorded. After one hour exposure, mosquitoes were transferred into holding tubes and provided with cotton wool saturated with a 10% honey solution. Batches exposed to untreated papers were used as control. Mortalities were recorded after 24 hours and the susceptibility status of the population was graded according to the WHO protocol . Dead and surviving mosquitoes from this bioassay were kept separately in eppendorf tubes containing silica gel and stored at −20°C for further molecular analysis.
Species identification and PCR detection of Ace-1 R mutation
Live and dead specimens of An. gambiae from the bioassay tests were subjected to the An. gambiae species specific PCR assays for species identification . Aliquots of DNA extracted from PCR positive specimens of An. gambiae s.s. were subjected to PCR assays for identification of the molecular ‘M’ and ‘S’ forms .
The PCR-RFLP diagnostic test was used to detect the presence of G119S mutation (ace.1 R gene). Mosquito genomic DNA was amplified using the primers Ex3AGdir 5′GATCGTGGACACCGTGTTCG3′ and Ex3AGrev 5′AGGATGGCCCGCTGGAACAG3′ according to . One microlitre of total DNA extracted from a single mosquito was used as a template in a 25 ml PCR reaction containing Taq DNA polymerase buffer, 0.2 mM dNTP and 10 pmol of each primer. The PCR conditions were 94°C for 5min and then 35 cycles of (94°C for 30 s, 54°C for 30 s and 72°C for 30 s) with a final 5 min extension at 72°C. Fifteen microlitres of PCR product were digested with 5U of AluI restriction enzyme (Promega) in a final volume of 25ml. The PCR fragments were fractionated on a 2% agarose gel stained with ethidium bromide and visualized under UV light.
The resistant status of mosquito samples was determined according to the WHO criteria :
Mortality rate is > 98%: the population was considered fully susceptible
Mortality rates ranged between 90 - 98%: resistance suspected in the population
Mortality rates < 90%, the population was considered resistant to the tested insecticides
To compare the status of insecticide resistance, Fisher's exact test was carried out to determine if there was any significant difference between mortality rates of populations of An. gambiae s.s. of districts using Statistica 6.0. Allelic frequencies of G119S mutation were analysed using the version 1.2 of Genepop . To assess if the mutation frequencies were identical across populations, the test of genotypic differentiation was performed .
Susceptibility to carbamates and organophosphates
Mortality of a susceptible strain (Kisumu) and wild populations of Anopheles gambiae s.s. exposed to diagnostic doses of technical material of insecticides
Molecular forms and frequencies of the ace-1 R mutation
Acetylcholinesterase phenotypes and frequency of ace-1 R mutation in the molecular M and S forms of Anopheles gambiae s.s
f( ace- 1)
f( ace- 1)
Role of ace-1 R mutation in providing bendiocarb resistance
Although there was a significant ace-1 R genotype differentiation between bioassay survivors and non-survivors (p<0.0001), homozygous susceptible mosquitoes were found among bioassay survivors.
Information on the resistance status of the main malaria vectors is essential to guide the choice of insecticides for use by The National Malaria Control Programme. Indeed, since 2011, the NMCP of Benin has implemented a large IRS campaign using bendiocarb in the department of Atacora. There is,therefore, the need to closely monitor insecticide resistance and bendiocarb resistance especially in malaria control programmes which rely solely on ITNs and IRS interventions in Benin. Moreover, very little data is available on the status of An. gambiae resistance to carbamates and organophosphates in the department of Atacora.
Results of this study showed that field populations of An. gambiae collected from five districts of the department of Atacora developed resistance to bendiocarb, propoxur, and fenitrothion but not to pirimiphos-methyl. This is the first time that bendiocarb resistance has been reported in Benin. Indeed, previous studies in the department of Atacora reported that An. gambiae were susceptible to bendiocarb in 2010 and justified its choice in IRS in this department (Aïkpon, personal communication). Akogbeto et al.  and Padonou et al.  reported this susceptibility of An. gambiae to bendiocarb in southern Benin. Moreover, An. gambiae displayed large variations in resistance levels to carbamates and organophosphates. Although the wild populations were all resistant to bendiocarb, resistance was less marked to propoxur and fenitrothion, at WHO diagnostic concentrations. However, all these populations were very susceptible to pirimiphos-methyl. The high resistance of the mosquito population to bendiocarb would be due to the strong selective pressure that represents the use of insecticides in households for public health purposes, notably IRS using bendiocarb and massive quantities of carbamates and organophosphates in agricultural settings in the department of Atacora. Indeed, in the cotton growing areas in Atacora, farmers use huge amounts of insecticides to avoid substantial yield reduction of their crops. Several studies showed that agricultural practices seem to have contributed to the emergence of insecticide resistance in Anopheles populations [10, 14, 30].
The development of resistance by the mosquito population to bendiocarb could jeopardize the current malaria control programme, specifically IRS using bendiocarb that is currently underway in the department of Atacora.
Cross-resistance to organophosphates and carbamates suggests the involvement of their common target site: AChE-1 . Indeed, the ace-1 R mutation was identified in all districts although its frequency remains relatively low, and agrees with previous findings that reported ace-1 R mutation in Benin .
In this study, the distribution of M and S molecular forms of An. gambiae s.s. agrees with previous findings in Benin that reported both M and S forms with the predominance of S forms in a savannah areas . The presence of ace-1 R mutations in both M and S forms of An. gambiae s.s. has already been reported by Weill et al.  and Djogbénou et al.  and was suggested to result from introgression between forms. However, the ace-1 R mutation frequency was higher in the S form. The low number of homozygous resistant individuals might be related to high fitness cost of the ace-1 R mutation, resulting in death of the homozygous resistant mosquitoes [31, 34, 35]. The high number of heterozygous resistant RS is also in agreement with previous studies that noticed that in areas where the resistant allele ace-1 R is present, resistant mosquitoes will mainly be in the heterozygote state (RS) [11, 35].
Moreover, the role of ace-1 R mutation in conferring bendiocarb resistance was assessed. The WHO bioassays performed on An. gambiae s.s. from the study area showed that the homozygous resistance was found only among bioassay survivors, however, the homozygous susceptible genotype (SS) is the most prevalent genotype among these survivors. The high proportion of homoygous susceptible specimens, which survived the WHO bioassays, added to the low rate of ace-1 R allele frequency may suggest the implication of biochemical resistance mechanisms.
Further investigation is needed to evaluate the biochemical mechanism that could be involved in the resistance of An. gambiae to carbamates and organophosphates and better understand the difference in resistance between the carbamates and organophosphates.
The present study provides useful information on the susceptibility of An. gambiae to carbamates and organophosphates. It showed that An. gambiae has developped a resistance to bendiocarb that can be a threat for malaria vector control in Benin. Hence, there is a need to implement vector resistance management approches to malaria vector control in Benin.
This work was financially supported by PMI (President’s Malaria Initiative) through USAID. We thank the Ministry of Higher Education and Scientific Research (MESRS) and the team of CREC for their technical assistance during field work. We also thank the people of Atacora for their collaboration.
- Gillies MT, Coetzee M: A supplement to the Anophelinae Africa South of the Sahara (Afrotropical region), Johannesburg, South Africa. S Afr Inst Med Res. 1987, 55: 1-143.Google Scholar
- Beier JC, Keating J, Githure JI, Macdonald MB, Impoinvil DE, Novak RJ: Integrated vector management for malaria control. Malaria J. 2008, 7 (supp1): 54-Google Scholar
- Curtis CF, Abraham E, Mnzava P: A comparison of use of a pyrethroid either for house spraying or for bednet treatment against malaria vectors. Trop Med Int Health. 1998, 3: 619-631. 10.1046/j.1365-3156.1998.00281.x.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Rowland M: Malaria control: bednets or spraying? Malaria control in the Afghan refugee camps of western Pakistan. Trans R Soc Trop Med Hyg. 1999, 93: 458-459. 10.1016/S0035-9203(99)90336-X.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Guillet P, Chandre F, Mouchet J: L'utilisation des insecticides en santé publique: état et perspectives. Med Mal Infect. 1997, 27: 552-557.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Devine GJ, Ogusuku E: Adaptability is key when monitoring insecticide resistance. Bull World Health Organ. 2009, 87: 887-10.2471/BLT.09.073502.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Elissa N, Mouchet J, Riviere F, Meunier JY, Yao K: Resistance of Anopheles gambiae s.s. to pyrethroids in Côte-d'Ivoire. Ann Soc Belge Med Trop. 1993, 73: 291-294.Google Scholar
- Akogbéto M, Yakoubou S: Résistance des vecteurs du paludisme vis-à-vis des pyréthrinoïdes utilisés pour l’imprégnation des moustiquaires au Bénin, Afrique de l’Ouest. Bull Soc Pathol Exot. 1999, 92: 123-130.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Chandre F, Darriet F, Duchon S, Finot L, Manguin S, Carnevale P, Guillet P: Modifications of pyrethroid effects associated with kdr mutation in Anopheles gambiae. Med Vet Entomol. 2000, 14: 81-88. 10.1046/j.1365-2915.2000.00212.x.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Akogbeto M, Djouaka RF, Kinde-Gazard DA: Screening of pesticide residues in soil water samples from agricultural settings. Malaria J. 2006, 5: 22-10.1186/1475-2875-5-22.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Ahoua-Alou LP, Koffi AA, Adja MA, Tla E, Kouassi PK, Kone M, Chandre F: Distribution of ace-1R and resistance to carbamates and organophosphates in Anopheles gambiae s.s. populations from Côte d'Ivoire. Malaria J. 2010, 9: 167-10.1186/1475-2875-9-167.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Vulule JM, Beach RF, Atieli FK, McAllister JC, Brogdon WG, Roberts JM, Mwangi RW, Hawley WA: Elevated oxidase and esterase levels associated with permethrin tolerance in Anopheles gambiae from Kenyan villages using permethrin impregnated nets. Med Vet Entomol. 1999, 13: 239-244. 10.1046/j.1365-2915.1999.00177.x.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Corbel V, N’Guessan R, Brengues C, Chandre F, Djogbenou L, Martin T, Akogbeto M, Hougard JM, Rowland M: Multiple insecticide resistance mechanisms in Anopheles gambiae and Culex quinquefasciatus from Benin, West Africa. Acta Trop. 2007, 101: 207-216. 10.1016/j.actatropica.2007.01.005.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Yadouleton AW, Asidi A, Djouaka RF, Braïma J, Agossou CD, Akogbeto MC: Development of vegetable farming: a cause of the emergence of insecticide resistance in populations of Anopheles gambiae in urban areas of Benin. Malaria J. 2009, 8: 103-10.1186/1475-2875-8-103.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Czeher C, Labbo R, Arzika I, Duchemin JB: Evidence of increasing Leu-Phe knockdown resistance mutation in Anopheles gambiae from Niger following a nationwide longlasting insecticide-treated nets implementation. Malaria J. 2008, 7: 189-10.1186/1475-2875-7-189.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Diabate A, Baldet T, Chandre F, Guiguemde RT, Brengues C, Guillet P, Hemingway J, Hougard JM: First report of the kdr mutation in Anopheles gambiae M form from Burkina Faso, West Africa. Parassitologia. 2002, 44: 157-158.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Fanello C, Petrarca V, Della Torre A, Santolamazza F, Dolo G, Coulibaly M, Alloueche A, Curtis CG, Toure YT, Coluzzi M: The pyrethroid knock-down resistance gene in the Anopheles gambiae complex in Mali and further indication of incipient speciation within An. gambiae s.s. Insect Mol Biol. 2003, 12: 241-245. 10.1046/j.1365-2583.2003.00407.x.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Awolola TS, Brooke BD, Koekemoer LL, Coetzee M: Resistance of the malaria vector Anopheles gambiae s.s. to pyrethroid insecticides, in south-western Nigeria. Ann Trop Med Parasitol. 2002, 96: 849-852. 10.1179/000349802125002581.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Oduola AO, Idowu ET, Oyebola MK, Adeogun AO, Olojede JB, Otubanjo OA, Awolola TS: Evidence of carbamate resistance in urban populations of Anopheles gambiae s.s. mosquitoes resistant to DDT and deltamethrin insecticides in Lagos, South-Western Nigeria. Parasit Vectors. 2012, 5: 116-10.1186/1756-3305-5-116.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Hargreaves K, Koerkemoer LL, Brooke B, Hunt RH, Mthembu J, Coetzee M: Anopheles funestus resistant to pyrethroid insecticides in South Africa. Med Vet Entomol. 2000, 14: 181-189. 10.1046/j.1365-2915.2000.00234.x.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Etang J, Manga L, Chandre F, Guillet P, Fondjo E, Mimpfoundi R, Toto JC, Fontenille D: Insecticide susceptibility status of Anopheles gambiae s.l. (Diptera: Culicidae) in the Republic of Cameroon. J Med Entomol. 2003, 40: 491-497. 10.1603/0022-2585-40.4.491.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- WHO: Recommandations de la consultation technique sur la lute contre les vecteurs du paludisme dans la Région africaine de l’OMS. 2011, Brazaville: Congo/Rapport technique de l’OMS, 2-Google Scholar
- Scott J, Brogdon W, Collins F: Identification of single specimens of the Anopheles gambiae complex by PCR. Am J Trop Med Hyg. 1993, 49: 520-529.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Favia G, Lanfrancotti A, Spanos L, Siden-Kiamos I, Louis C: Molecular characterization of ribosomal DNA polymorphisms discriminating among chromosomal forms of Anopheles gambiae s.s. Insect Mol Biol. 2001, 10: 19-23. 10.1046/j.1365-2583.2001.00236.x.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Weill M, Lutfalla G, Mogensen K, Chandre F, Berthomieu A, Berticat C, Pasteur N, Philips A, Fort P, Raymond M: Insecticide resistance in mosquito vectors. Nature. 2003, 423: 136-137.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Raymond M, Rousset F: Genepop (version 1.2), population genetics software for exact tests and eucumenicism. J Heredity. 1995, 86: 248-249.Google Scholar
- Goudet J, Raymond M, De Meeüs T, Rousset F: Testing differentiation in diploid populations. Genetics. 1996, 144: 1933-1940.PubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
- Akogbéto MC, Padonou GG, Gbénou D, Irish S, Yadouleton A: Bendiocarb, a potential alternative against pyrethroid resistant Anopheles gambiae in Benin, West Africa. Malaria J. 2010, 9: 204-10.1186/1475-2875-9-204.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Padonou GG, Sezonlin M, Gbedjissi GL, Ayi I, Azondekon R, Djenontin A, Bio-Bangana S, Oussou O, Yadouleton A, Boakye D, Akogbeto M: Biology of Anopheles gambiae and insecticide resistance: Entomological study for a large scale of indoor residual spraying in South East Benin. J Parasitol Vector Biol. 2011, 3 (4): 9-68.Google Scholar
- Diabaté A, Baldet T, Chandre F, Akogbeto M, Guiguemde TR, Darriet F, Brengues C, Guillet P, Hemingway J, Small GJ, Hougard JM: The role of agricultural use of insecticides in resistance to pyrethroids in Anopheles gambiae s.l. in Burkina Faso. Am J Trop Med Hyg. 2002, 67: 617-622.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Weill M, Malcolm C, Chandre F, Mogensen K, Berthomieu A, Marquine M, Raymond M: The unique mutation in Ace-1 giving high insecticide resistance is easily detectable in mosquito vectors. Insect Mol Biol. 2004, 13: 1-7. 10.1111/j.1365-2583.2004.00452.x.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Djogbénou L, Chandre F, Berthomieu A, Dabiré R, Koffi A, Alou H, Weill M: Evidence of introgression of the ace-1 R mutation and of the ace-1 duplication in West African Anopheles gambiae s.s. PLoS One. 2008, 3 (5): 2172-10.1371/journal.pone.0002172.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Djogbénou L, Pasteur N, Bio-Bangana S, Baldet T, Irish SR, Akogbeto M, Weill M, Chandre F: Malaria vectors in the Republic of Benin: Distribution of species and molecular forms of the Anopheles gambiae complex. Acta Trop. 2010, 114: 116-122. 10.1016/j.actatropica.2010.02.001.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Asidi AN, N'Guessan R, Koffi AA, Curtis CF, Hougard JM, Chandre F, Darriet F, Zaim M, Rowland MW: Experimental hut evaluation of bednets treated with an organophosphate (chlorpyrifos-methyl) or a pyrethroid (lambdacyalothrin) alone and in combination against insecticide-resistant Anopheles gambiae s.s. and Culex quinquefasciatus mosquitoes. Malaria J. 2005, 4: 25-10.1186/1475-2875-4-25.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Djogbénou L, Noel V, Agnew P: Costs of insensitive acetylcholinesterase insecticide resistance for the malaria vector Anopheles gambiae homozygous for the G119S mutation. Malaria J. 2010, 9: 12-10.1186/1475-2875-9-12.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.