Open Access

Eliminating female Anopheles arabiensis by spiking blood meals with toxicants as a sex separation method in the context of the sterile insect technique

  • Hanano Yamada1, 2Email author,
  • Sharon M Soliban1,
  • Marc JB Vreysen1,
  • Dave D Chadee2 and
  • Jeremie RL Gilles1
Parasites & Vectors20136:197

https://doi.org/10.1186/1756-3305-6-197

Received: 15 April 2013

Accepted: 26 June 2013

Published: 3 July 2013

Abstract

Background

Ivermectin has longevity reducing effects in several insect species, including disease transmitting mosquitoes after feeding on hosts that have received ivermectin treatment. This has important implications in mosquito population control and thus the reduction of disease transmission. In addition, ivermectin could play an enormous role in mosquito control operations by its use in the female elimination process during mass-rearing, enabling the release of only sterile males in the context of the sterile insect technique (SIT).

Methods

Blood meals were spiked with various toxicants and were then offered to adult Anopheles arabiensis and killing effects were observed. Varying concentrations of the most effective substance were then tested in subsequent trials to obtain an optimal dose for quick and total female elimination. The remaining males were mated with untreated virgin females to assess whether their mating efficiency had been compromised. The most promising substance at the optimal concentration was further tested on a larger number of adults, after they had been irradiated and partially sterilised as pupae with 70 Gy to evaluate the feasibility of the method in a mass-rearing, and SIT context. The males resulting from the latter trial were also checked for mating efficiency post treatments.

Results

Ivermectin (Virbamec®) at a concentration of 7.5 ppm was chosen from the toxicants tested as sufficiently effective in eliminating all female An. arabiensis in 4 days, the shortest time required for female elimination of all chemicals tested. Mating efficiency of the non-blood feeding male mosquitoes was not compromised significantly compared to controls even when they were kept for a total of 4 days (from emergence) before theoretical release. The irradiation treatment did not affect overall female feeding behaviour in this setting, nor were the sterile males less competitive for mating with virgin females after the treatments than virgin sterile males that had not been in the ivermectin treatment environment.

Conclusions

Spiking bloodmeals with ivermectin has shown potential as a viable treatment to eliminate female An. arabiensis from laboratory colonies although its practical use in a mass-rearing facility still needs to be tested.

Keywords

Anopheles arabiensis IvermectinVirbamec®Female eliminationMale competitivenessSterilisationSterile insect technique

Background

Ivermectin is a macrocyclic lactone extract from the bacteria Streptomyces avarnitalis that acts at invertebrate glutamate-gated chloride channels [1] inhibiting neurotransmission and thereby affecting the nervous system and muscle function in parasites. This drug has proven to be effective for treating mammals against a broad range of nematodes and ectoparasites [2] and is used globally in animal husbandry practices. Ivermectin has been found safe for treatment of humans [3] and is currently being used with great success in mass drug administration (MDA) campaigns against onchocerciasis and lymphatic filariasis [4, 5]. In addition, numerous reports have demonstrated the efficacy of ivermectin in significantly reducing the longevity of several arthropod species such as triatomine bugs, ticks, sandflies, and scabies [3].

In 1983 the effects of ivermectin on the tsetse fly was first documented by Distelmans et al.[6] who demonstrated high mortality in Glossina tachinoides flies that were fed on piglets treated with ivermectin. Other investigations have shown that the treatment of host animals with the active ingredient can achieve some level of tsetse population control [7], although the extent of this control was not further investigated in this study. Similar treatment effects were observed in mosquitoes following the MDA of ivermectin to humans: An. gambiae could be killed within 6 days after the administration of a standard dose of ivermectin (150 to 200 μg/kg body weight), indicating a mosquito population reducing effect that may have the potential to reduce malaria transmission [4]. However, this lethal effect was only apparent for one week, therefore this treatment modality alone will not serve as an effective intervention strategy [2, 5].

Numerous studies have demonstrated the efficacy of ivermectin as a larvicide [8, 9] and when fed to vertebrates have proven to be effective in reducing longevity to an array of mosquito species such as Culex quinquefasciatus[810], An. gambiae[5, 11], An. arabiensis[11], An. stephensi[9, 12], Ae. aegypti[9, 10], Ae. albopictus[10], An. sacharova[12], An. farauti[13], and An. quadrimaculatus[14]. Reducing the longevity of medically important mosquitoes is a favourable side effect of medical treatments with ivermectin. In addition to this, it was hypothesized that ivermectin could be used for female elimination in mass-rearing facilities that produce male mosquitoes for use in incompatible insect technique (IIT) [1518], and the sterile insect technique (SIT) [19] where only-male releases are permitted.

The SIT is an environmental friendly vector control tactic that becomes more effective under inversely density dependent conditions and is usually integrated with other control tactics on an area-wide basis. The target insect is reared in large numbers in specialised factories, the male sex sterilized with ionizing radiation and sequentially released in the target area in numbers that allow them to outcompete their wild counterparts for mates. Mating of a sterile male with a virgin wild female results in no offspring and the reduced replacement rate will eventually suppress or even eradicate a target population [19, 20].

Spiking bloodmeals with an insecticide for the purpose of mosquito sex separation is not a new idea. This method was implemented in an An. albimanus control program with an SIT component in El Salvador, whereby >95% of females were eliminated by adding malathion to bloodmeals [21]. Although not all females could be eliminated and increased male mortality was a negative side effect, this method was applied for lack of a better alternative until it was replaced by a genetic sexing strain (GSS) based on propoxur resistance [21] in the males.

A number of other substances have also shown to reduce mosquito longevity; however, for the purpose of female elimination in a mass-rearing setting for the SIT, the fatal effects of these compounds need to be quick and reliable, resulting in 100% female kill, while having no detrimental effects on male mating efficiency following their release. We therefore tested substances in addition to ivermectin and malathion that may be suitable, and have been previously reported as having lethal effects in mosquitoes or other insects: spinosad, a known insecticide with acute oral toxicity in honeybees [22] and has been tested for attractive toxic sugar baits (ATSB) for mosquito control [23]; boric acid which was also used effectively for ATSB against An. gambiae and An. arabiensis in Mali [24]; dieldrin which has been used in previous studies by Yamada et al.[25] and has shown to have high contact toxicity in An. arabiensis, and finally household detergent to assess if it had any lethal effects when ingested by adult mosquitoes (as opposed to its effects when applied to larval stages, [26]).

The following experiments were designed to test the various toxicants in bloodmeals to determine whether they can eliminate An. arabiensis females quickly and reliably. In addition, further investigations were conducted to determine the mating efficiency of the remaining males in terms of insemination rates of new, virgin females made available to these males. Based on these results the most efficient toxicant was then used on a larger scale (n = 1000 insects) including irradiation of the insects as pupae to assess the feasibility of this female elimination method in the context of the SIT.

Methods

Mosquito colony rearing: An. arabiensis originating from Dongola, Northern State, Sudan, were reared in the insectary as described by Yamada et al.[25].

Preliminary tests: selecting a toxicant

Blood meals (defrosted bovine blood) were prepared in 45 ml centrifuge tubes containing the following substances at various concentrations: Detergent Pril Original (Henkel KGaA, Düsseldorf, Germany) (1000 ppm, 5000 ppm, 10000 ppm (0.1, 0.5, and 1% solutions)), boric acid (Sigma Aldrich Handels GmbH, Vienna, Austria) (1000 ppm, 5000 ppm, 10000 ppm), dieldrin (Sigma Aldrich Handels GmbH, Vienna, Austria) (1, 1.5 and 2 ppm solutions), malathion (Sigma Aldrich Handels GmbH, Vienna, Austria) (0.5, and 2 ppm solution), ivermectin (Virbamec, Virbac Oesterreich GmbH, Vienna, Austria) (0.5, 2, 5, and 7.5 ppm solutions), and spinosad (spynosin A and D, Sigma Aldrich Handels GmbH, Vienna, Austria) (1, 5, and 10 ppm solutions). The blood was warmed in a water bath and subsequently poured into a Hemotek device that maintained the temperature of the blood at 35°C ± 1°C and placed on 30 × 30 × 30 cm cages containing 100 mosquitoes for a period of 2 h. Dead mosquitoes were counted each morning over the following 5 days. The toxicants most effective in eliminating females were selected for use in a subsequent larger-scale trial.

Optimising the efficiency of eliminating females and assessing the effect on male mating

Nine standard 30 × 30 × 30 cm cages (Megaview Science Education Services Co, Ltd, Taiwan) were stocked each with 1000 pupae (a mix of males and females): three for treatment with 7.5 ppm ivermectin-spiked blood, three for treatment with 10 ppm spinosad-spiked blood, and three control cages receiving untreated, defrosted bovine blood. Blood meals prepared as described above were offered to the mosquitoes for at least 2 h every day. Mortality of male and female mosquitoes was assessed every morning until all females had died.

After all females were eliminated from the treatment groups (day 4 post emergence), 100 males from each ivermectin cage (as this worked more efficiently than spinosad) and from each control cage were transferred to new cages, each containing 100 virgin females of the same age as the males. Some of these males from the ivermectin treatment cages were likely to have mated with a small proportion of the few remaining females before they were all eliminated, whereas the males from the control cages were likely to have mated for the entire duration (4 days) of the experiment as these females were not being killed. Additional three cages were stocked with 100 virgin males and 100 virgin females for evaluation of the mating potential compared to the males from the treatment cages. All adult mosquitoes were of the same age. They were left to mate for three consecutive nights, before the females were removed and dissected under a stereoscope and checked for insemination: females were collected and spermathecae were checked for the presence of sperm. Insemination rates were calculated as the number of females inseminated over total number of females.

Testing the feasibility of blood spiking in the context of the SIT

An. arabiensis mosquitoes were reared as described above, and batches of approximately 1000 pupae that had been quantified volumetrically in netted spoons were irradiated (20–26 h after pupation) in a 60Co Gamma cell 220 (Nordion, Ottawa, Canada) with a dose of 70 Gy which induces partial sterility (~83%) as described by Helinski et al.[27]. A dosimetry system was used to verify the dose received by the batches based on the Gafchromic HD-810 film (International Speciality Products, NJ, USA) [28]. Each group of pupae was then placed in each of 9 (30 × 30 × 30 cm) cages (3 for ivermectin treatment, 3 control cages, and 3 cages with virgin sterile males only) and allowed to emerge. Pupal mortality was recorded. An additional batch of 1000 non-irradiated pupae was sexed and both males and females were kept for the mating efficiency experiments.

Adult mosquitoes were offered a blood meal daily with untreated blood (control), or with 7.5 ppm ivermectin spiked blood as described above, and mortality counted daily until all females were dead. Cages with only virgin males were not offered a bloodmeal.

After all females were eliminated from the treatment cages, 100 males from each of the 3 treatment cages, each of the 3 control cages, from the 3 cages of virgin sterile males, and from the 3 cages of virgin fertile males were aspirated out and transferred to 12 new separate cages all containing 100 virgin females. All adults were of the same age. They were left to mate for 3 nights before the females were removed and dissected to check for insemination as described above. The cages containing virgin males only were given a sugar solution only.

The 4 types of males were compared in terms of mating efficiency: The sterile males from the control cages that were kept together with females for the 4 blood feeding days (C ♂); the sterile males from the treatment cages remaining after all females were eliminated by spiked bloodmeals (Tx ♂); virgin sterile males that were kept separately from females and had no chances of mating (v.♂ ster); and virgin fertile males that were kept separately from females and had no chances of mating (v.♂ fert).

Statistical analysis

The reduction of female longevity in all treatment groups was compared using Kaplan-Meier survival analysis. The resulting survival curves were then compared to the control using Mantel-Cox log-rank tests. Insemination rates for each of the test groups were pooled to get an average value per treatment, and were compared by ANOVA. Graphics and statistical analyses were performed using Microsoft Excel 2003 (Microsoft, 216 Redmond, WA; 1985–2003) and Minitab release 13.32 (Minitab; 2000). In all cases, the alpha level was P < 0.05.

Results

Selecting toxicant

In the samples of 100 adults, ivermectin and spinosad eliminated females most quickly and thoroughly, with 100% kill by day 4 (Table 1). Spinosad at 10 ppm was able to knock down females within 12 h of the bloodmeal, but they took longer to die than the ivermectin bloodmeals, which knocked down females almost immediately after blood-feeding, and killed them within 12 h, resulting in almost 80% female kill after the first bloodmeal. Based on these results spinosad (10 ppm) and ivermectin (7.5) were selected as the most promising and used for the following experiment.
Table 1

Population reduction of males and females following bloodmeals containing 6 different toxicants compared to controls fed on untreated bovine blood

Toxicant

Concentration

Day

1

2

3

4

5

  

Sex

F / M

F / M

F / M

F / M

F / M

Control

0.00%

F

0.00

0.02

0.02

0.04

0.04

M

0.00

0.00

0.02

0.02

0.06

0.00%

F

0.02

0.06

0.06

0.08

0.08

M

0.00

0.02

0.04

0.04

0.06

0.00%

F

0.00

0.03

0.03

0.05

0.13

M

0.00

0.00

0.00

0.00

0.03

Detergent

0.10%

F

0.02

0.02

0.02

0.02

0.06

M

0.00

0.00

0.00

0.02

0.06

0.50%

F

0.00

0.00

0.00

0.06

0.08

M

0.02

0.02

0.02

0.06

0.08

1.00%

F

0.02

0.02

0.02

0.06

0.14

M

0.00

0.00

0.00

0.02

0.04

Boric acid

0.10%

F

0.00

0.00

0.00

0.12

0.22

M

0.00

0.00

0.06

0.10

0.14

0.50%

F

0.00

0.04

0.08

0.24

0.32

M

0.00

0.00

0.02

0.02

0.06

1.00%

F

0.00

0.02

0.32

0.50

0.66

M

0.00

0.00

0.04

0.06

0.08

Dieldrin

1 ppm

F

0.00

0.66

0.66

0.79

0.81

M

0.06

0.07

0.07

0.07

0.09

1.5 ppm

F

0.00

0.72

0.72

0.76

0.83

M

0.06

0.06

0.06

0.06

0.07

2 ppm

F

0.00

0.79

0.79

0.83

0.84

M

0.06

0.08

0.09

0.13

0.14

Spinosad

1 ppm

F

0.00

0.04

0.20

0.42

0.42

M

0.00

0.02

0.06

0.06

0.06

5 ppm

F

0.12

0.26

0.34

0.84

0.84

M

0.00

0.02

0.06

0.06

0.06

10 ppm

F

0.32

0.42

0.76

1.00

1.00

M

0.00

0.00

0.04

0.04

0.06

Ivermectin

0.5 ppm

F

0.18

0.20

0.25

0.48

0.48

M

0.00

0.00

0.03

0.08

0.08

2 ppm

F

0.35

0.45

0.53

0.78

0.83

M

0.00

0.00

0.00

0.03

0.05

5 ppm

F

0.79

0.97

0.99

1.00

1.00

M

0.00

0.00

0.02

0.02

0.04

Malathion

0.5 ppm

F

0.00

0.08

0.10

0.15

0.18

M

0.00

0.00

0.00

0.00

0.05

2 ppm

F

0.00

0.13

0.18

0.35

0.58

  

M

0.00

0.03

0.03

0.08

0.08

Substances most effective in killing females, while not affecting males are shown (in bold). Each sample consisted of 100 adult mosquitoes (50 females and 50 males).

Optimising the efficiency of eliminating females and assessing the effect on male mating

Spiking bloodmeals

The adult female mosquitoes readily took a bloodmeal on day 1 post emergence. Of the samples of 1000 adults (volumetrically estimated as pupae and with a male:female ratio close to 1:1), approximately 10% of the females did not take a blood meal on the first day but both ivermectin and spinosad worked well in eliminating females from the cages. However, comparing daily mortalities, ivermectin at 7.5 ppm was faster in knocking down and killing the females than the spinosad at 10 ppm (day 1: p = 0.0091; day 2: p = 0.0342; day 3: p = 0.0001; day 4: p = 0.0057). Ivermectin was able to kill more than 90% of females on day 1, more than 98% by day 2, and 100% by day 3, while spinosad needed approximately one day longer to achieve similar results (Figure 1). The results indicate that approximately 16% mortality occurred amongst control females, reflecting a normal level of mortality as observed in regular rearing after blood feeding. Males in both treatment groups survived well during the 5 day experimental period, with only 5% mortality in the ivermectin cages and 7% in the spinosad cages (Figure 2). Control cages had higher male mortality (12%, p = 0.0071).
Figure 1

Percentage of females remaining in control cages and treatment cages. Elimination of females from the cage population (approximately 500 females and 500 males) over 5 days in control cages (solid line), in cages fed with 10 ppm spinosad-spiked blood (dotted line), and 7.5 ppm ivermectin-spiked blood (semi-dotted line). Error bars represent SEM.

Figure 2

Percentage of males remaining in control cages and treatment cages. Males remaining in cages for the duration of 5 days in control cages (solid line), in cages fed with 10 ppm spinosad-spiked blood (dotted line), and 7.5 ppm ivermectin-spiked blood (semi-dotted line). (Cages contained 500 females and 500 males). Error bars represent SEM.

Mating efficiency

Males from the female treatment group were as efficient (69.5%) (p = 0.146) in inseminating virgin females as were virgin control males (74.8%) (Figure 3). Males in the control cages were significantly less efficient in inseminating the new virgin females added to them (41.7%), than were males from the treatments and virgin males (p = 0.016, p = 0.007).
Figure 3

Insemination rates of females by virgin males (v ♂), males from treatment cages (ivermectin ) (Tx ♂), and males from control cages (C ♂). Each group consisted of 100 males and 100 females. Groups that are statistically different are labelled with different letters. Error bars represent SEM.

Testing the feasibility of blood spiking in the context of the SIT

Irradiation at the pupal stage

Among irradiated and non-irradiated pupae mortality rates were slightly elevated (close to 2%) possibly due to the volumetric quantification process. Close to 1000 adults emerged in all cages at an approximate 1:1 male to female ratio as would be expected in nature.

Spiking bloodmeals

In this trial, it was still possible to eliminate almost all females (96%) by day 3, and 100% by day 4 (Figure 4), however, the number of irradiated females killed during the first 2 days was much lower than in the trial with non-irradiated females (38.8% on day 1, and 75.7% on day 2, compared to almost 90% on day 1, and 98% on day 2, respectively). Male mortality in the treatment cages was slightly, but significantly higher at 20% (p = 0.0041) than in the control cages (14%) (Figure 5).
Figure 4

Percentage of irradiated females remaining in control cages and treatment cages. Elimination of irradiated females from the population (approximately 500 females and 500 males) over 4 days in control cages (solid line) and in cages fed with 7.5 ppm ivermectin-spiked blood (semi-dotted line). Error bars represent SEM.

Figure 5

Percentage of irradiated males remaining in control cages and treatment cages. Irradiated males remaining in cages for the duration of 4 days in control cages (solid line) and in cages fed with 7.5 ppm ivermectin-spiked blood (semi-dotted line). Error ba represent SEM.

Mating efficiency

The results show that C ♂ were unable to mate with as many females as observed in the other groups, with only 30% of the females inseminated (Figure 6). The “optimal” males, v.♂ fert, were only able to inseminate an average of 59.6% of the females in the 3 night period. Both the Tx ♂ and v.♂ ster were able to mate with, and inseminate approximately half of the females (49.2% and 48.1% respectively).
Figure 6

Insemination rates of females by irradiated males from control cages (C ♂), irradiated males from ivermectin treatment cages (Tx ♂), irradiated virgin males (v. ♂ Ster), and fertile virgin males (v. ♂ Fert). Each group consisted of 100 males and 100 females. Groups that are statistically different are labelled with different letters. Error bars represent SEM.

Discussion

The An. arabiensis females readily took a blood meal from day 1, which is not always observed in other mosquito species. Those that fed on the ivermectin-spiked blood were killed reliably and efficiently within 12 hours. No instance of females surviving a sub-lethal dose was observed. At these concentrations, even non-fully engorged females were killed. The challenge is to motivate as many of the females as possible as soon as possible to take a blood meal. Therefore, improving the blood-feeding method may directly increase female killing, for instance removing the sugar source several hours before offering the blood-meal, using fresh blood as opposed to thawed frozen blood, timing the blood-feeding to preferred times of day (for example dusk/dawn, or during the night), prolonging blood-feeding for several hours, or feeding multiple times per day, keeping in mind not all of these suggestions are practical or cost effective in a mass-rearing setting. Some of the treatment cages contained adult females that did not take a blood meal at all (approximately 1 in 500, i.e. 0.002%). These were few, and mostly unusually small in size, and as they refuse to blood feed, (even when offered arm-feeding by a volunteer), they would not pose a threat as a disease transmitter. However, it has been reported for other species, that virgin females sometimes do not blood feed initially, but then may later take a blood meal once inseminated. It was found by Charlwood et al.[29] that in the wild, the size of female An. gambiae is important but not completely responsible for them feeding as virgins. Most of the smaller females survived to mate, but did not seem to survive for very long thereafter [29]. Whether An. arabiensis females that refuse bloodmeals initially go on to mate and subsequently seek a blood meal is not known, and would require further research. Furthermore, if females were to survive bloodmeals that perhaps have a sublethal concentration of ivermectin (due to possible miscalculations while preparing the blood meals), it has been reported that ivermectin in the mosquito disrupts parasite development, thereby reducing the female’s disease transmitting potential [5].

For sterile male releases in the context of the SIT, the complete elimination of females from a mosquito population at the adult stage as is the case here needs to be quick. The longer the females are present in the cages, the higher the chances of their mating sterile males, which are unable to replenish their sperm stock, making them less efficient in inseminating wild females post-release and therefore compromising the SIT’s effectiveness. However, there have been some studies suggesting that irradiated mosquitoes require some days to recover before regaining mating activity [30], making the few days needed for 100% female kill not necessarily detrimental to male mating efficiency post release. The implications of keeping the adult males for several days before releasing them have not yet been fully investigated. Allowing adult males to sugar feed, mature sexually, and recover from handling and irradiation before mass releases may indeed improve their competitiveness compared to releasing them as pupae, or immediately after emergence.

The observation of some mortality in both males and females in control cages were not unexpected as overcrowding cages and regular blood-feeding has been shown to cause elevated mortality rates in insectary rearing. Male mortality was low in treatment cages, but survival may still be improved by adding resting sites and additional sugar sources.

Male survival is equally a priority for the SIT. Therefore, the toxicants to be chosen for female killing should ideally induce high oral- and low contact toxicity. In a mass-rearing facility, large amounts of the toxicant may be required, therefore the substance should be relatively inexpensive, readily available, and most importantly, safe for humans, other vertebrates and the environment. Some of the substances tested in this experiment did not meet these requirements, were less effective than ivermectin and should therefore not be considered for mosquito sexing purposes on a large scale. Both ivermectin and spinosad are good candidates as they can be considered a natural product that are used safely in organic agriculture [31]. They have a good environmental profile, and both substances have low vertebrate toxicity, making them relatively safe for human handling.

The mating frequency of the first batch of non-irradiated males from the treatment environment was acceptable considering that there was a 1:1 male:female ratio on the first day post-emergence. This can be explained by the males not having reached full sexual maturation at this point, resulting in minimal to no mating activities during the first day. On the second day, the male:female ratio was closer to 10:1 with only few females available for mating. By day 3, there were no more females available. When these males were added to virgin females again at a 1:1 ratio, they were able to mate as efficiently as the virgin control males in the 3 day mating period. However, it is important to note that fertile An. arabiensis males are able to replenish their sperm stock for a period of at least 6 days [32]. Nevertheless, fertile males from control cages were far less efficient in mating the virgin females after spending 4 days together with females during the experiment although they had a 3 day mating period in which sperm production and mating could take place.

Post irradiation, there was an indication that the females did not take a blood meal as readily on the first 2 days as the non-irradiated females in the previous experiment. This could be due to the need for a recovery phase after the irradiation process [30]. The irradiation did not, however, increase mortality in control females during the first 4 days post-emergence. Although by day 3, most of the females (96.1%) in the treatment groups had been killed, there was less blood-feeding and thus less mortality among females during days 1 and 2. This allowed females to remain available for mating, which in theory may decrease male mating potential after this period considering that fully sterile males are no longer able to produce new sperm and can mate only a few times [32]. Partially sterile males may show similar characteristics in terms of mating abilities and limited sperm production, but this requires further investigation.

As initially expected, the mating efficiency of the partially sterile males from the control cages achieved lower insemination rates in the new virgin females as they had the opportunity to mate with the surviving females for the duration of the 4 blood feeding days. Nevertheless, the males were able to mate with 30% of the virgin females, suggesting that the peak mating activity may be delayed by the effects of irradiation, or partially sterile males are able to mate more often than initially expected. More surprisingly, treatment of males and virgin sterile males showed no difference in their mating capabilities in terms of the proportion of new virgin females inseminated. Although there were still females present in the treatment cages on days 1 and 2, a delay in mating activity until after these days could again explain that there was little to no mating in the treatment cages. Control virgin fertile males were able to inseminate around 60% of the virgin females in the 3 nights. The 10% decrease in the insemination rates seen in both the treatment and virgin sterile males may be attributed to their partial sterility only, with little or no impact on mating potential from the female elimination process.

Conclusions

Ivermectin is an acceptable substance in terms of environmental and health safety, and is very efficient in killing female An. arabiensis following oral exposure via spiked bloodmeals. It is possible to eliminate all females quickly, allowing the remaining males to sustain their mating potential following release, even after irradiation at 70 Gy. Further tests are needed to ensure these capabilities following a fully sterilising dose of 120 Gy [27, 33]. Alternatively, the approach we describe here followed by male irradiation at the adult stage is an option that may improve both blood-feeding behaviour in females, and male fitness post release, as it has been reported that irradiation at later (adult) stages incurs less somatic damage thus improving competitiveness in mosquitoes [27]. This method requires further evaluations on the mating potential and competitiveness of males remaining after blood spiking that will be irradiated versus wild males. All in all, the method of female elimination by spiking blood meals discussed here has room for improvement, but has the potential for use in SIT, IIT, or other techniques requiring simple and effective female elimination.

Although the method described here will likely be practical as a temporary solution and for lack of better alternatives, it does, however, have limitations. Keeping females until a blood feeding age in a mass-rearing facility will increase the costs significantly compared to rearing only males until adulthood in terms of feeding, as well as space and labour requirements. In addition, the reliability of the method will not remain at a constant 100% as it is dependent on behavioural attributes, which can never be controlled completely, and may change over time or in response to other external factors. The efficiency and reliability of a good genetic sexing strain will be difficult to obtain, but this method is effective, simple, and has potential for application against many other mosquito species that currently lack alternative sexing methods.

Declarations

Acknowledgements

We appreciate the donation of the Dongola strain by Badria El Sayed. HY greatly appreciates the financial support as a Junior Professional Officer which was enabled by the United States State Department.

Authors’ Affiliations

(1)
Insect Pest Control Laboratory, Joint FAO/IAEA Division of Nuclear Techniques in Food and Agriculture, International Atomic Energy Agency
(2)
Department of Life Sciences, University of the West Indies

References

  1. Yates DM, Wolstenholme AJ: An ivermectin-sensitive glutamate-gated chloride channel subunit from Dirofilaria immitis. Int J Parasitol. 2004, 34: 1075-1081. 10.1016/j.ijpara.2004.04.010.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. Bastiaens GJH, Van Gemert GJ, Hooghof J, Lindsay SW, Drakeley C, Churcher TS, Verhave JP, Kocken CHM, Sauerwein RW, Bousema T: Duration of the mosquitocidal effect of ivermectin. MW Journal. 2012, 3: 1-5.Google Scholar
  3. Chaccour C, Lines J, Whitty CJ: Effect of ivermectin on Anopheles gambiae mosquitoes fed on humans: the potential of oral insecticides in malaria control. J Infect Dis. 2010, 202: 113-116. 10.1086/653208.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. Kobylinski K: Ivermectin mass drug administration to humans for malaria parasite transmission control. PhD Thesis. 2011, Colorado State University: Department of MicrobiologyGoogle Scholar
  5. Kobylinski KC, Sylla M, Chapman PL, Sarr MD, Foy BD: Short report: Ivermectin mass drug administration to humans disrupts malaria parasite transmission in Senegalese villages. AmJTrop Med Hyg. 2011, 85: 3-5. 10.4269/ajtmh.2011.11-0160.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  6. Distelmans W, D'Haeseleer F, Mortelmans J: Efficacy of systemic administration of ivermectin against tsetse flies. Ann Soc belge Méd trop. 1983, 63: 119-125.Google Scholar
  7. Van denBossche P, Geerts S: The effects on longevity and fecundity of Glossina tachinoides after feeding on pigs treated with ivermectin. Ann Soc Belg Med Trop. 1988, 68: 133-139.Google Scholar
  8. Alves SN, Serrão JE, Mocelin G, Melo AL: Effect of ivermectin on the life cycle and larval fat body of Culex quinquefasciatus. Braz Arch Biol Technol. 2004, 47: 433-439.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  9. Pampiglione S, Majori G, Petrangeli G, Romi R: Avermectins, MK-933 and MK-936, for mosquito control. Trans R Soc Trop Med Hyg. 1985, 79: 797-799. 10.1016/0035-9203(85)90121-X.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. Tesh RB, Guzman H: Mortality and infertility in adult mosquitoes after the ingestion of blood containing ivermectin. AmJTrop Med Hyg. 1990, 43: 229-233.Google Scholar
  11. Fritz ML, Siegert PY, Walker ED, Bayoh MN, Vulule JR, Miller JR: Toxicity of bloodmeals from ivermectin-treated cattle to Anopheles gambiae sl. Ann Trop Med Parasitol. 2009, 103: 539-547. 10.1179/000349809X12459740922138.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. Iakubovich VI, Zakharova NF, Alekseev AN, Alekseev EA: Evaluation of the action of ivermectin on blood-sucking mosquitoes. Med Parazitol (Mosk). 1989, 3: 60-64.Google Scholar
  13. Foley DH, Bryan JH, Lawrence GW: The potential of ivermectin to control the malaria vector Anopheles farauti. Trans R Soc Trop Med Hyg. 2000, 94: 625-628. 10.1016/S0035-9203(00)90211-6.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. Jones JW, Meisch MV, Meek CL, Bivin WS: Lethal effects of ivermectin on Anopheles quadrimaculatus. J Am Mosq Control Assoc. 1992, 8: 278-280.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. Barr AR: Cytoplasmic incompatibility in natural populations of a mosquito, Culex pipiens L. Nature. 1980, 283: 71-72. 10.1038/283071a0.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. Bourtzis K, Robinson AS: Insect pest control using Wolbachia and/or radiation. Insect Symbiosis, Volume 2. Edited by: Taylor & Francis, Bourtzis K, Miller TA. 2006, Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press, 225-246.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  17. Brelsfoard CL, Dobson SL: Wolbachia- based strategies to control insect pests and disease vectors. Asia Pac J Mol Biol Biotechnol. 2009, 17: 55-63.Google Scholar
  18. Calvitti M, Moretti R, Lampazzi E, Bellini R, Dobson SL: Characterization of a new Aedes albopictus (Diptera: Culicidae)-Wolbachia pipientis (Rickettsiales: Rickettsiaceae) symbiotic association generated by artificial transfer of the w Pip strain from Culex pipiens (Diptera: Culicidae). J Med Entomol. 2010, 47: 179-187. 10.1603/ME09140.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. Dyck VA, Hendrichs JP, Robinson AS: The Sterile Insect Technique: Principles and Practice in Area-Wide Integrated Pest Management. 2005, Dordrecht: SpringerView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  20. Knipling EF: Sterile-male method of population control. Science. 1959, 130: 902-904. 10.1126/science.130.3380.902.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. Lowe RE, Fowler JEF, Bailey DL, Dame DA, Savage KE: Separation of sexes of adult Anopheles albimanus by feeding of insecticide-laden blood. Mosq News. 1981, 41: 634-638.Google Scholar
  22. Miles M: The effects of spinosad, a naturally derived insect control agent to the honeybee. B Insectol. 2003, 56: 119-124.Google Scholar
  23. Allan SA: Susceptibility of adult mosquitoes to insecticides in aqueous sucrose baits. J Vect Ecol. 2011, 36: 59-67. 10.1111/j.1948-7134.2011.00141.x.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  24. Müller GC, Beier JC, Traore SF, Toure MB, Traore MM, Bah S, Doumbia S, Schlein Y: Successful field trial of attractive toxic sugar bait (ATSB) plant-spraying methods against malaria vectors in the Anopheles gambiae complex in Mali, West Africa. Malar J. 2010, 9: 210-10.1186/1475-2875-9-210.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  25. Yamada H, Benedict MQ, Malcolm CA, Oliva CF, Soliban SM: Gilles. 2012, Genetic sex separation of the malaria vector, Anopheles arabiensis, by exposing eggs to dieldrin. Malar J: JRLGoogle Scholar
  26. Van Emden HM, Kroon CCM, Schoeman EN, Van Seventer HA: The toxicity of some detergents tested on Aedes aegypti L., Lebistes reticulatus peters, and Biomphalaria glabrat (Say). Environ Pollut. 1974, 6: 297-308. 10.1016/0013-9327(74)90018-4.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  27. Helinski MEH, Parker AG, Knols BG: Radiation-induced sterility for pupal and adult stages of the malaria mosquito Anopheles arabiensis. Malar J. 2006, 5: 41-10.1186/1475-2875-5-41.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  28. Gafchromic® dosimetry system for SIT - Standard operating procedure. [http://www-naweb.iaea.org/nafa/ipc/public/Dosimetry_SOP_v11.pdf]
  29. Charlwood JD, Pinto J, Sousa CA, Ferreira C, Petrarca V, Rosario VE: 'A mate or a meal' - Pre-gravid behaviour of female Anopheles gambiae from the islands of Sao Tome and Principe, West Africa. Malar J. 2003, 2: 9-10.1186/1475-2875-2-9.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  30. Oliva CF, Jacquet M, Gilles J, Lemperiere G, Maquart PO, Quilici S, Schooneman F, Vreysen MJB, Boyer S: The sterile insect technique for controlling populations of Aedes albopictus (Diptera: Culicidae) on Reunion Island: Mating vigour of sterilized males. PLoS One. 2012, 7: e49414-10.1371/journal.pone.0049414.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  31. Sparks TC, Dripps JE, Watson GB, Paroonagian D: Resistance and cross-resistance to the spinosyns - review and analysis. Pestic Biochem Physiol. 2011, 102: 1-10.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  32. Damiens D, Vreysen MJB, Gilles JRL: Anopheles arabiensis sperm production after genetic manipulation, dieldrin treatment, and irradiation. J Med Entomol. 2013, 50: 314-316. 10.1603/ME12058.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  33. Helinski MEH, Knols BG: The influence of late-stage pupal irradiation and increased irradiated: un-irradiated male ratio of mating competitiveness of the malaria mosquito Anopheles arabiensis Patton. Bull Entomol Res. 2009, 99: 317-322. 10.1017/S0007485308006354.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright

© Yamada et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2013

This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Comments

By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.

Advertisement