Skip to main content

Temporal changes in mosquito abundance (Culex pipiens), avian malaria prevalence and lineage composition



Knowledge on the temporal dynamics of host/vector/parasite interactions is a pre-requisite to further address relevant questions in the fields of epidemiology and evolutionary ecology of infectious diseases. In studies of avian malaria, the natural history of Plasmodium parasites with their natural mosquito vectors, however, is mostly unknown.


Using artificial water containers placed in the field, we monitored the relative abundance of parous females of Culex pipiens mosquitoes during two years (2010–2011), in a population in western Switzerland. Additionally, we used molecular tools to examine changes in avian malaria prevalence and Plasmodium lineage composition in female C. pipiens caught throughout one field season (April-August) in 2011.


C. pipiens relative abundance varied both between years and months, and was associated with temperature fluctuations. Total Plasmodium prevalence was high and increased from spring to summer months (13.1-20.3%). The Plasmodium community was composed of seven different lineages including P. relictum (SGS1, GRW11 and PADOM02 lineages), P. vaughani (lineage SYAT05) and other Plasmodium spp. (AFTRU5, PADOM1, COLL1). The most prevalent lineages, P. vaughani (lineage SYAT05) and P. relictum (lineage SGS1), were consistently found between years, although they had antagonistic dominance patterns during the season survey.


Our results suggest that the time window of analysis is critical in evaluating changes in the community of avian malaria lineages infecting mosquitoes. The potential determinants of the observed changes as well as their implications for future prospects on avian malaria are discussed.


Seasonal variations in ecological and climatic parameters such as day length, rainfall, temperature or available resources are particularly marked at mid-latitudes with temperate climates. Seasonality is highly important for the population dynamics of infectious diseases and often results in cyclic prevalence patterns of the parasites within susceptible host populations (reviewed in [1]). Cyclic dynamics may arise from seasonal modifications in the biology and the behaviour of animal hosts and their parasites favoring contact rates between them [2]. For instance, seasonal migration of animals may offer different hitchhiking trajectories for parasites and may shape the parasite community structure at a local scale [3].

Malaria parasites (Plasmodium spp., Haemosporidae: Apicomplexa) are extremely diversified protozoan blood parasites [4, 5] that are transmitted to vertebrate hosts by blood-sucking dipteran insect vectors [6]. The general life cycle of Plasmodium parasites seems to be well conserved across vertebrate hosts [6, 7], although their dynamics of infection within the vertebrate hosts can substantially vary depending on the combinations between host and parasite lineages e.g. [810]. Malaria-infected hosts classically suffer a first peak of parasitaemia (acute infection phase), which occurs about 15 days after the parasite inoculation. The parasite then gradually retreats from the blood to the host’s internal organs where it is no longer transmissible to the vectors (latent infection phase). The infection may remain latent for several months until a secondary blood relapse of the parasite arises. Cycles of latent infection and relapse can then reoccur at fixed time intervals.

Many studies have investigated the seasonal incidence of malaria parasites in susceptible host populations to further predict the risk of becoming infected [11]. Most of these longitudinal studies agree that malaria outbreaks generally arise synchronously in late spring or, in tropical zones, near the monsoon season [1214]. This “spring relapse” has been particularly emphasized in avian malaria studies [1522] and although it is believed to coincide with the seasonal peak abundance of the blood-sucking vectors [23], thus facilitating parasite transmission [24], the seasonal dynamics of major disease vectors remains understudied in temperate Europe [25].

The development of new PCR-based methods [26, 27] has allowed the documentation of dynamic changes in the communities of avian Plasmodium lineages within wild bird species populations [2832] or individual hosts [3336]. Whilst seasonal changes in host immunocompetence could explain the observed patterns of abundance and persistence of avian Plasmodium lineages in these studies, we do not know much about the role of natural vectors in the epidemiology of avian malaria [3739]. Recent epidemiological models have however demonstrated that they play a central role in Plasmodium temporal dynamics [40].

There is growing evidence that the northern house mosquito, Culex pipiens (Diptera: Culicidae), is a major vector of avian malaria in the northern hemisphere [4147]. This mosquito, which can act as a vector of several other infectious diseases such as arboviruses [48], is sensitive to seasonal changes [49]. For instance, autumnal decreases in day length and temperature have been shown to trigger a genetic cascade [50] that inhibits host-seeking and blood-feeding behaviour in overwintering C. pipiens populations [51]. To get a better understanding of the complex malarial interactions, it is thus of crucial interest to account for the infection dynamics of the vectors, as well as their seasonal patterns of abundance.

Here, we monitored the relative abundance of one population of C. pipiens mosquitoes during two years (2010–2011) in western Switzerland. In 2011, we also surveyed this mosquito population for avian malaria infection from April to September. Our aims were (i) to investigate the relationship between climatic variables (rainfall and temperature) and mosquito population densities, (ii) to determine the Plasmodium infection dynamics of the vectors through the season and (iii) to document changes in the parasite community structure on a larger temporal scale, through data comparison with a previous long-term survey conducted at our study site on both mosquitoes and bird hosts. The present study is therefore part of a continuous effort to provide a better understanding of avian malaria interactions in a natural model system.


Study site and mosquito survey

Mosquito surveys were conducted from April to September 2010 and 2011, at the edge of the urban forest of Dorigny (46°31′N; 6°34′E; alt. 400 m), on the campus of the University of Lausanne (Switzerland). Temperature and precipitation data were obtained from the closest meteorological station (Swiss Federal Office of Meteorology and Climatology) located in Pully, about 7 km southeast of our study site. Rainfall collecting containers (50×30×25 cm) intended to provide gravid female mosquitoes with oviposition sites were set up at our spot survey in the early spring and removed in autumn. 160 to 179 containers were initially filled up with water from Lake Léman, located at the South of the study site, and baited with baker’s yeast so as to favour container visitation by gravid Culex pipiens females [52]. The containers were positioned one next to another, at a density of about 4 containers/m2. All containers were inspected twice a week for egg rafts. Because the number of collected egg rafts was strongly heterogeneous between the different containers, we measured n, the density of egg rafts, as the mean number of egg rafts collected per container per inspection date. Egg raft densities provided us with reliable estimates of the C. pipiens relative abundance throughout the year [53, 54] and the measurements were congruent with the data gained from the survey of gravid C. pipiens with mosquito traps (see Additional file 1: Figure S1).

Field-collection of adult gravid female mosquitoes

Collection of adult female C. pipiens was carried out two to three times per week from April to September 2011 (26 weeks), by using gravid mosquito traps (Bioquip, California). Each trapping day, gravid traps were set up at sunset on the containers that totaled the highest number of egg rafts during the preceding week. The traps were removed the next morning, after sunrise. Collected mosquitoes were transferred to individual plastic vials (SARTSDET, 30 ml) and were maintained unfed for 23 days on average, until they died. Freshly dead mosquitoes were transferred within the day to -80°C to further determine their malaria infection status by using PCR-based methods.

Molecular analyses

DNA from the mosquito thorax samples was extracted by using the DNeasy tissue extraction kit combined with the Biosprint96 workstation (QIAGEN), according to the manufacturer’s instructions. A nested-PCR protocol was used to amplify a portion (478-bp long) of the mitochondrial cytochrome b gene (mtDNA cyt b) of the parasite (see [26, 27] for further detailed explanations of the method). PCR-products were purified and sequenced as described by van Rooyen et al. [33, 34]. We then used MEGA (version 5) for sequence editing and alignment [55]. The MalAvi database allowed us to link genetic polymorphism of the mtDNA cyt b gene with previously identified Plasmodium lineages [4].

Statistical analysis

We used multiple linear regression models with the ordinary least squares (OLS) method to investigate whether C. pipiens density differed between years (2010 and 2011) and between months (April-September). C. pipiens density (mean egg rafts per container per inspection date, dependent variable) was log (n+1) transformed and modeled as a function of year and month of capture nested within year. Mean daily temperature, precipitation and the interaction between temperature and precipitation were considered as continuous covariates in the models. Contrasts between months were then conducted with a Tukey’s HSD test. We used the Pearson’s correlation to investigate covariance pattern between cumulated densities of C. pipiens and degree-day accumulation.

To assess changes in avian malaria prevalence throughout 2011, we model avian malaria prevalence (proportion of mosquitoes found infected per date) with a quasibinomial error structure as a function of months (April-September). The significance of month was determined using a F-test [56]. Pairwise comparisons between mean monthly prevalence were then conducted with t-tests, using April as the reference month. Sampling dates with less than five collected mosquitoes were discarded from the analysis of prevalence.

We used a Chi-square test to determine whether prevalence of species-specific infection varied during 2011. Adult female mosquitoes caught in September 2011 were dismissed from this analysis as only one mosquito was found infected (over 68 captured). Statistical analyses were conducted using JMP 9.0 (SAS Institute Inc., Cary, NC) and R 2.15.2 [57].


C. pipiens relative abundance

Egg raft density significantly differed between years (F1,110 = 26.80; P < 0.001) and between months (F10,110 = 8.53; P < 0.001; Figure 1). Egg raft density significantly peaked in July 2010, when environmental conditions were the warmest of the season. No such peak was observed in July 2011, which was exceptionally cold (Figure 1). This pattern resulted in a significant effect of temperature on egg raft density (F1,110 = 56.58; P < 0.001). Indeed, cumulative egg raft density was highly predicted by degree-days accumulation in both years (Pearson’s correlation: 2010: n = 46, r = 0.98, P < 0.001; 2011: n = 78, r = 0.98, P < 0.0001; overall: n = 124, r = 0.97, P < 0.001; Figure 2). Egg raft density was however not significantly influenced by precipitation (F1,110 = 0.21; P = 0.645), neither by the interaction between precipitation and temperature (F1,109 = 0.98; P = 0.325).

Figure 1

Seasonal changes in the density of Culex pipiens egg rafts and in the rainfall, at Dorigny (Switzerland). Egg raft density was determined as the mean of monthly collected egg rafts per container and per trap date. Error bars are the standard errors of the means. Values between parentheses indicate mean monthly temperature. Egg raft density was significantly different between months not connected by the same letters (Tukey’s HSD test, P < 0.05).

Figure 2

Relationship between cumulated densities of Culex pipiens egg rafts and degree-days accumulation. Densities of C. pipiens egg rafts (collected egg rafts per container and per collection date) were cumulated throughout collection dates. Cumulated values are presented on a log scale (log(n +1)). Degree-days accumulation (log scale) started with the 1st January as biofix date. The regression line (full line) has the following equation y = 1.97× -5.15, R2 = 0.95. N= 137 days sampled across seasons (April-September) in 2010 (grey circles) and in 2011 (empty circles).

Avian malaria prevalence and lineage diversity

Over 1155 mosquitoes collected across the survey (April-September) 2011, 178 (15.4%) were found positive for avian Plasmodium infection (Table 1). Analysis of the mtDNA cyt b sequences (430–478 bp) retrieved from mosquitoes’ thorax samples allowed us to identify seven different Plasmodium lineages. We found: SYAT05 (50.6% of the infections, n = 90), SGS1 (34.3%, n = 61), AFTRU05 (6.7%, n= 12), GRW11 (4.5%, n =8), PADOM01 (1.7%, n = 3), COLL1 (1.1%, n = 2), PADOM02 (0.6%, n = 1) and one positive sample with undetermined lineage. SYAT05 lineage is associated with the morphospecies Plasmodium (Novyella) vaughani and SGS1, GRW11 and PADOM02 to Plasmodium (Haemamoeba) relictum[5861]. The remaining lineages AFTRU5, COLL1 and PADOM01, for which morphospecies identities are not yet available in the literature, were grouped as Plasmodium spp. lineages.

Table 1 Number of captured female Culex pipiens and prevalence of avian malaria in the study site

Temporal changes in Plasmodium prevalence and lineage community

Avian malaria prevalence significantly varied between months (F = 5.79, P < 0.001, Table 1). The proportion of infected mosquitoes was relatively stable from April to June (estimate ± SE: May-April: 0.36 ± 0.31, t = 1.16, P = 0.254; June-April: 0.29 ± 0.33, t = 0.86, P = 0.393), increased in July (April-July: 0.70 ± 0.32, t = 2.161, P = 0.037) peaked in August (August-April: 0.71 ± 0.32, t = 2.20, P = 0.034) before declining drastically in September (September-April: -1.79 ± 0.85, t = -2.11, P = 0.041) well below the value observed in early spring.

Prevalence of species-specific infection (P. relictum, P. vaughani or Plasmodium spp.) significantly differed between months (Chi-square test: n=177, df = 8, χ2 = 35.93, P < 0.001). Plasmodium vaughani (lineage SYAT05) appeared to be gradually replaced along the season by P. relictum (lineage SGS1, GRW11 and PADOM02) and later by other Plasmodium spp. (COLL1, PADOM1, AFTRU5 lineages) (Figure 3).

Figure 3

Changes in avian Plasmodium community structure throughout the season (April-August) 2011. Grey bars (Plasmodium relictum), black bars (P. vaughani) and white bars (Plasmodium spp.). The total number of infected female C. pipiens (N) is given for each month.


C. pipiens relative abundance

Year of sampling has a strong effect on C. pipiens relative abundance. In 2010, the general picture was similar to previous seasonal records conducted in other countries [6267]. C. pipiens appear around May and the density slowly increases until a seasonal maximum in July-August [68] or sometimes later in September [54]. In 2011, unusual cold temperatures during summer months may explain the relative low abundance of C. pipiens over the season survey [65]. The tight relationship between mosquito abundance and field temperatures reported in the present study is well documented in the literature [6972] and may serve as baseline to model the entomological risk for avian malaria.

Avian malaria prevalence

The high rate of C. pipiens infection reported in the present study (16.3%), together with previous surveys conducted at our study site [45], reinforces the view that C. pipiens is a natural vector of avian malaria in western Switzerland, as observed as well elsewhere in the northern hemisphere [4145, 73]. However, we used highly selective gravid mosquito-traps to target parous C. pipiens females and our infection rate refers to this group only and was thus not comparable with similar studies using different trapping methods, such as sentinel or light traps.

We found that female C. pipiens caught in summer (July-August) 2011 were more likely to be infected than those trapped in spring (April-June), a prevalence pattern that is further corroborated by previous field investigations on natural malaria vectors [24, 38, 39, 44]. This result is consistent with the idea that the spring relapse in the bird reservoir hosts results in a seasonal increase of mosquitoes exposed to malaria parasites. Alternatively, evidence that C. pipiens can adjust their feeding preference for host species as a response to seasonal changes in bird-species abundance is increasing [44, 62, 7476]. This process may in turn affect vector prevalence, if the different host species encountered throughout the season are differentially susceptible to avian malaria. Other environmental (abiotic) factors changing seasonally may also have influenced the overall infection rates of C. pipiens[40].

Plasmodium lineage diversity

Plasmodium vaughani (SYAT05 lineage) and Plasmodium relictum (SGS1 lineage) were the two most prevalent parasites (50.6% and 34.3%), a result similar to previous surveys conducted across Europe [41, 42, 45]. Both lineages are probably the most documented parasites in avian-malaria studies, as they have been found nearly worldwide, in hundreds of different bird species [77]. Lineage SGS1 however exploits a wider diversity of bird orders than SYAT05, which is restricted to passerines (Passeriformes). AFTRU5 (Plasmodium spp.) was found at a lower prevalence (about 7% of the infections). This lineage has only been found in Blue throats (Luscinia svecica) and African thrushes (Turdus pelios), in Middle East and West Africa respectively [5, 78]. Our study is the first to report its occurrence in Europe. It is possible that lineage AFTRU5 has indeed been imported in Europe by migratory birds. Finally, rare lineages (≤ 4.5% of the infections) included PADOM02 and GRW11 (both attributed to P. relictum) and COLL1 and PADOM01 of unknown species. These last four lineages are frequently found in native passerines species in Europe [7983]. It is not yet clear whether these Plasmodium lineages were scarce due to rare transmission opportunities at our study site or because they result in high vector mortalities [45].

Temporal changes in the parasite community structure

A previous study conducted at our study site [45] allowed us to compare the structure of the Plasmodium community on a four year interval. P. vaughani (SYAT05 lineage) and P. relictum (SGS1, GRW11 and PADOM02 lineages) were found in both studies but other species, such as P. circumflexum (TURDUS1 lineage) and P. polare (SW2 lineage) were found only in 2006–2007. On the other hand, lineages AFTRU5 and COLL1 (Plasmodium spp.) were new in 2011–2012. To our knowledge, only one study conducted in Japan [37] has previously documented between-year variation in the composition of the avian Plasmodium community in vectors: these authors found that the most prevalent Plasmodium lineages persist over several years whilst less frequent ones were not consistently encountered at the same period of each year.

In the present study, we also report for the first time that the dominance of Plasmodium species within the studied population of mosquitoes varied through the season. Whilst the total prevalence of Plasmodium infection, irrespective of strain, increased, infection by P. vaughani (lineage SYAT05) decreased from spring to summer in favour of P. relictum (lineage SGS1, GRW11 and PADOM02). This result may be due to seasonal changes in the host feeding preferences of the vectors. Previous studies indeed support the idea that different bird species can host different Plasmodium lineages [47, 84]. Future studies are needed to investigate temporal changes in (i) the blood-feeding preferences of C. pipiens and (ii) the communities of Plasmodium that infect different bird species in our study system.

An alternative explanation to the seasonal changes in Plasmodium lineage composition is that concomitant infection of C. pipiens by P. relictum and P. vaughani may have increased throughout the season, resulting in lower transmissibility of P. vaughani if vectors had evolved cross-immunity. Blocked transmission of one parasite species by another has for instance been documented in Aedes aegypti mosquitoes experimentally co-infected with P. gallinaceum and P. juxtanucleare[85]. This process may result in negative periodicity of species-specific infections [86]. Competitive interactions within vectors may also provide an explanation for why we did not find mosquitoes carrying mixed infections.

Finally, different avian Plasmodium species may optimally develop within vectors under different environmental conditions. For instance, the minimum temperature requirement for human malaria parasites is 16.5°C, 17.5°C and 18°C for P. malariae, P. vivax and P. falciparum respectively [87] whilst the rodent malaria parasite P. berghei may be transmitted at lower temperatures [88]. Avian malaria P. relictum optimally develop within vectors at 27°C [89] and temperatures below 20°C inhibited or strongly delayed sporozoïte development [89, 90]. However, the sporogonic cycle of P. vaughani has been incompletely investigated [77] and further comparative studies at different temperatures are needed.


We showed that despite an apparent persistence of major avian malaria parasites over several years, the structure of the Plasmodium community infecting C. pipiens does dynamically change, when looking at a finer temporal scale. These changes are most likely due to the interplay of ecological and climatic factors influencing demographic, behavioural and life history parameters of both host and vector populations. Future investigations will determine whether the same changes in the Plasmodium lineage composition can repeat over several years and should account for the spatial dimension of parasite, vector and host distributions.

Authors’ information

OG and PC authors share the senior authorship of the study.


  1. 1.

    Altizer S, Dobson A, Hosseini P, Hudson P, Pascual M, Rohani P: Seasonality and the dynamics of infectious diseases. Ecol Lett. 2006, 9 (4): 467-484. 10.1111/j.1461-0248.2005.00879.x.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. 2.

    Christe P, Arlettaz R, Vogel P: Variation in intensity of a parasitic mite (Spinturnix myoti) in relation to the reproductive cycle and immunocompetence of its bat host (Myotis myotis). Ecol Lett. 2000, 3 (3): 207-212. 10.1046/j.1461-0248.2000.00142.x.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. 3.

    Altizer S, Bartel R, Han BA: Animal migration and infectious disease risk. Science. 2011, 331 (6015): 296-302. 10.1126/science.1194694.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. 4.

    Bensch S, Hellgren O, Pérez-Tris J: MalAvi: a public database of malaria parasites and related haemosporidians in avian hosts based on mitochondrial cytochrome b lineages. Mol Ecol Resour. 2009, 9 (5): 1353-1358. 10.1111/j.1755-0998.2009.02692.x.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. 5.

    Martinsen ES, Perkins SL, Schall JJ: A three-genome phylogeny of malaria parasites (Plasmodium and closely related genera): evolution of life-history traits and host switches. Mol Phylogenet Evol. 2008, 47 (1): 261-273. 10.1016/j.ympev.2007.11.012.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. 6.

    Garnham PCC: Malaria parasites and other Haemosporidia. 1966, Oxford: Blackwell Scientific Publications

    Google Scholar 

  7. 7.

    Reece SE, Ramiro RS, Nussey DH: SYNTHESIS: Plastic parasites: sophisticated strategies for survival and reproduction?. Evol Appl. 2009, 2 (1): 11-23. 10.1111/j.1752-4571.2008.00060.x.

    PubMed Central  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. 8.

    Palinauskas V, Valkiūnas GN, Bolshakov CV, Bensch S: Plasmodium relictum (lineage P-SGS1): Effects on experimentally infected passerine birds. Exp Parasitol. 2008, 120 (4): 372-380. 10.1016/j.exppara.2008.09.001.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. 9.

    Palinauskas V, Valkiūnas G, Bolshakov CV, Bensch S: Plasmodium relictum (lineage SGS1) and Plasmodium ashfordi (lineage GRW2): The effects of the co-infection on experimentally infected passerine birds. Exp Parasitol. 2011, 127 (2): 527-533. 10.1016/j.exppara.2010.10.007.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. 10.

    Zehtindjiev P, Ilieva M, Westerdahl H, Hansson B, Valkiūnas G, Bensch S: Dynamics of parasitemia of malaria parasites in a naturally and experimentally infected migratory songbird, the great reed warbler Acrocephalus arundinaceus. Exp Parasitol. 2008, 119 (1): 99-110. 10.1016/j.exppara.2007.12.018.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. 11.

    Thomson MC, Connor SJ, Milligan PJM, Flasse SP: The ecology of malaria - As seen from Earth-observation satellites. Ann Trop Med Parasitol. 1996, 90 (3): 243-264.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. 12.

    Hoshen MB, Morse AP: A weather-driven model of malaria transmission. Malar J. 2004, 3 (1): 32-10.1186/1475-2875-3-32.

    PubMed Central  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. 13.

    Bigoga JD, Nanfack FM, Awono-Ambene PH, Patchoké S, Atangana J, Otia VS, Fondjo E, Moyou RS, Leke RGF: Seasonal prevalence of malaria vectors and entomological inoculation rates in the rubber cultivated area of Niete. South Region of Cameroon. Parasit Vectors. 2012, 5: 197-10.1186/1756-3305-5-197.

    PubMed Central  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. 14.

    Eisen RJ: Variation in life-history traits of Plasmodium mexicanum, a malaria parasite infecting western fence lizards: a longitudinal study. Can J Zool. 2000, 78 (7): 1230-1237.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. 15.

    Allander K, Bennett GF: Prevalence and intensity of haematozoan infection in a population of great tits Parus major from Gotland. Sweden. J Avian Biol. 1994, 25 (1): 69-74. 10.2307/3677296.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. 16.

    Christe P, Møller AP, González G, De Lope F: Intraseasonal variation in immune defence, body mass and hematocrit in adult house martins Delichon urbica. J Avian Biol. 2002, 33 (3): 321-325. 10.1034/j.1600-048X.2002.330317.x.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. 17.

    Cosgrove CL, Wood MJ, Day KP, Sheldon BC: Seasonal variation in Plasmodium prevalence in a population of blue tits Cyanistes caeruleus. J Anim Ecol. 2008, 77 (3): 540-548. 10.1111/j.1365-2656.2008.01370.x.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. 18.

    Weatherhead PJ, Bennett GF: Ecology of red-winged blackbird parasitism by haematozoa. Can J Zool. 1991, 69 (9): 2352-2359. 10.1139/z91-331.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. 19.

    Van Oers K, Richardson DS, Saether SA, Komdeur J: Reduced blood parasite prevalence with age in the Seychelles Warbler: selective mortality or suppression of infection?. J Ornithol. 2010, 151 (1): 69-77. 10.1007/s10336-009-0427-x.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. 20.

    Schrader MS, Walters EL, James FC, Greiner EC, Grubb T: Seasonal prevalence of a haematozoan parasite of red-bellied woodpeckers (Melanerpes carolinus) and its association with host condition and overwinter survival. Auk. 2003, 120 (1): 130-137.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. 21.

    Castro I, Howe L, Tompkins DM, Barraclough RK, Slaney D: Presence and seasonal prevalence of Plasmodium spp. in rare endemic New Zealand passerine (Tieke or Saddleback, Philesturnus carunculatus). J Wildl Dis. 2011, 47 (4): 860-867. 10.7589/0090-3558-47.4.860.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. 22.

    Bennett GF, Cameron M: Seasonal prevalence of avian Hematozoa in Passeriform birds of Atlantic-Canada. Can J Zool. 1974, 52 (10): 1259-1264. 10.1139/z74-167.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. 23.

    Beaudoin RL, Applegate JE, Davis DE, McLean RG: A model for the ecology of avian malaria. J Wildl Dis. 1971, 7: 5-13.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. 24.

    Applegate JE, Beaudoin RL, Seeley DC: The effect of spring relapse in english sparrows on infectivity of malaria to mosquitoes. J Wildl Dis. 1971, 7: 91-92.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. 25.

    Sebesta O, Gelbic I, Pesko J: Daily and seasonal variation in the activity of potential vector mosquitoes. Cent Eur J Biol. 2011, 6 (3): 422-430. 10.2478/s11535-011-0019-7.

    Google Scholar 

  26. 26.

    Bensch S, Stjernman M, Hasselquist D, Ostman O, Hansson B, Westerdahl H, Pinheiro RT: Host specificity in avian blood parasites: a study of Plasmodium and Haemoproteus mitochondrial DNA amplified from birds. Proc R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 2000, 267 (1452): 1583-1589. 10.1098/rspb.2000.1181.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  27. 27.

    Waldenström J, Bensch S, Hasselquist D, Ostman O: A new nested polymerase chain reaction method very efficient in detecting Plasmodium and Haemoproteus infections from avian blood. J Parasitol. 2004, 90 (1): 191-194. 10.1645/GE-3221RN.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. 28.

    Hellgren O, Wood MJ, Waldenström J, Hasselquist D, Ottosson U, Stervander M, Bensch S: Circannual variation in blood parasitism in a sub-Saharan migrant passerine bird, the garden warbler. J Evol Biol. 2013, 26 (5): 1047-1059. 10.1111/jeb.12129.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. 29.

    Fallon S, Ricklefs R, Latta S, Bermingham E: Temporal stability of insular avian malarial parasite communities. Proc R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 2004, 271 (1538): 493-500. 10.1098/rspb.2003.2621.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  30. 30.

    Bensch S, Åkesson S: Temporal and spatial variation of Hematozoans in Scandinavian Willow Warblers. J Parasitol. 2003, 89 (2): 388-391. 10.1645/0022-3395(2003)089[0388:TASVOH]2.0.CO;2.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. 31.

    Bensch S, Waldenström J, Jonzén N, Westerdahl H, Hansson B, Sejberg D, Hasselquist D: Temporal dynamics and diversity of avian malaria parasites in a single host species. J Anim Ecol. 2007, 76 (1): 112-122. 10.1111/j.1365-2656.2006.01176.x.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. 32.

    Knowles SCL, Wood MJ, Alves R, Wilkin TA, Bensch S, Sheldon BC: Molecular epidemiology of malaria prevalence and parasitaemia in a wild bird population. Mol Ecol. 2011, 20 (5): 1062-1076. 10.1111/j.1365-294X.2010.04909.x.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. 33.

    Van Rooyen J, Lalubin F, Glaizot O, Christe P: Avian haemosporidian persistence and co-infection in great tits at the individual level. Malar J. 2013, 12 (1): 40-10.1186/1475-2875-12-40.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. 34.

    Van Rooyen J, Lalubin F, Glaizot O, Christe P: Altitudinal variation in haemosporidian parasite distribution in great tit populations. Parasit Vectors. 2013, 6: 139-10.1186/1756-3305-6-139.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. 35.

    Latta SC, Ricklefs RE: Prevalence patterns of avian haemosporida on Hispaniola. J Avian Biol. 2010, 41 (1): 25-33. 10.1111/j.1600-048X.2009.04685.x.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. 36.

    Piersma T, van der Velde M: Dutch House Martins Delichon urbicum gain blood parasite infections over their lifetime, but do not seem to suffer. J Ornithol. 2012, 153 (3): 907-912. 10.1007/s10336-012-0826-2.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. 37.

    Kim KS, Tsuda Y: Avian Plasmodium lineages found in spot surveys of mosquitoes from 2007 to 2010 at Sakata wetland, Japan: do dominant lineages persist for multiple years?. Mol Ecol. 2012, 21 (21): 5374-10.1111/mec.12047.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  38. 38.

    Ferraguti M, Martínez-de la , Puente J, Muñoz J, Roiz D, Ruiz S, Soriguer R, Figuerola J: Avian Plasmodium in Culex and Ochlerotatus mosquitoes from southern Spain: effects of season and host-feeding source on parasite dynamics. PLoS One. 2013, 8 (6): e66237-10.1371/journal.pone.0066237.

    PubMed Central  CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  39. 39.

    Reeves WC, Herold RC, Rosen L, Brookman B, Hammon WM: Studies on avian malaria in vectors and hosts and encephalitis in Kern county, California. 2. Infections in mosquito vectors. Am J Trop Med Hyg. 1954, 3 (4): 696-703.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  40. 40.

    Smith DL, Dushoff J, McKenzie FE: The risk of a mosquito-borne infection in a heterogeneous environment. PLoS Biol. 2004, 2 (11): e368-10.1371/journal.pbio.0020368.

    PubMed Central  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  41. 41.

    Ventim R, Ramos JA, Osório H, Lopes RJ, Pérez-Tris J, Mendes L: Avian malaria infections in western European mosquitoes. Parasitol Res. 2012, 111: 637-645. 10.1007/s00436-012-2880-3.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  42. 42.

    Inci A, Yildirim A, Njabo K, Duzlu O, Biskin Z, Ciloglu A: Detection and molecular characterization of avian Plasmodium from mosquitoes in central Turkey. Vet Parasitol. 2012, 188 (1): 179-184.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  43. 43.

    Kimura M, Darbro JM, Harrington LC: Avian malaria parasites share congeneric mosquito vectors. J Parasitol. 2010, 96 (1): 144-151. 10.1645/GE-2060.1.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  44. 44.

    Kim KS, Tsuda Y: Seasonal changes in the feeding pattern of Culex pipiens pallens govern the transmission dynamics of multiple lineages of avian malaria parasites in Japanese wild bird community. Mol Ecol. 2010, 19 (24): 5545-5554. 10.1111/j.1365-294X.2010.04897.x.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  45. 45.

    Glaizot O, Fumagalli L, Iritano K, Lalubin F, Van Rooyen J, Christe P: High prevalence and lineage diversity of avian malaria in wild populations of great tits (Parus major) and mosquitoes (Culex pipiens). PLoS One. 2012, 7 (4): e34964-10.1371/journal.pone.0034964.

    PubMed Central  CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  46. 46.

    Ejiri H, Sato Y, Kim KS, Tsuda Y, Murata K, Saito K, Watanabe Y, Shimura Y, Yukawa M: Blood meal identification and prevalence of avian malaria parasite in mosquitoes collected at Kushiro Wetland, a subarctic zone of Japan. J Med Entomol. 2011, 48 (4): 904-908. 10.1603/ME11053.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  47. 47.

    Medeiros MCI, Hamer GL, Ricklefs RE: Host compatibility rather than vector–host-encounter rate determines the host range of avian Plasmodium parasites. Proc R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 2013, 280 (1760): 20122947-10.1098/rspb.2012.2947.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  48. 48.

    Farajollahi A, Fonseca DM, Kramer LD, Marm Kilpatrick A: “Bird biting” mosquitoes and human disease: A review of the role of Culex pipiens complex mosquitoes in epidemiology. Infect Genet Evol. 2011, 11 (7): 1577-1585. 10.1016/j.meegid.2011.08.013.

    PubMed Central  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  49. 49.

    Tauber MJ, Tauber CA: Insect seasonality - diapause maintenance, termination, and postdiapause development. Annu Rev Entomol. 1976, 21: 81-107. 10.1146/annurev.en.21.010176.000501.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  50. 50.

    Robich RM, Rinehart JP, Kitchen LJ, Denlinger DL: Diapause-specific gene expression in the northern house mosquito, Culex pipiens L., identified by suppressive subtractive hybridization. J Insect Physiol. 2007, 53 (3): 235-245. 10.1016/j.jinsphys.2006.08.008.

    PubMed Central  CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  51. 51.

    Robich RM, Denlinger DL: Diapause in the mosquito Culex pipiens evokes a metabolic switch from blood feeding to sugar gluttony. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2005, 102 (44): 15912-15917. 10.1073/pnas.0507958102.

    PubMed Central  CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  52. 52.

    Guerenstein PG, Lorenzo MG, Núñez JA, Lazzari CR: Baker’s yeast, an attractant for baiting traps for Chagas’ disease vectors. Experientia. 1995, 51 (8): 834-837. 10.1007/BF01922439.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  53. 53.

    Madder DJ, MacDonald RS, Surgeoner GA, Helson BV: The use of oviposition activity to monitor populations of Culex pipiens and Culex restuans (Diptera: Culicidae). Can Entomol. 1980, 112 (10): 1013-1017. 10.4039/Ent1121013-10.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  54. 54.

    Jackson BT, Paulson SL: Seasonal abundance of Culex restuans and Culex pipiens in southwestern Virginia through ovitrapping. J Am Mosq Control Assoc. 2006, 22 (2): 206-212. 10.2987/8756-971X(2006)22[206:SAOCRA]2.0.CO;2.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  55. 55.

    Tamura K, Peterson D, Peterson N, Stecher G, Nei M, Kumar S: MEGA5: molecular evolutionary genetics analysis using maximum likelihood, evolutionary distance, and maximum parsimony methods. Mol Biol Evol. 2011, 28 (10): 2731-2739. 10.1093/molbev/msr121.

    PubMed Central  CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  56. 56.

    Crawley MJ: The R book. 2007, New York: John Wiley

    Book  Google Scholar 

  57. 57.

    R Development Core Team: R: A language and environment for statistical computing. Vienna, Austria: R Foundation for Statistical Computing. 2012,,

    Google Scholar 

  58. 58.

    Zehtindjiev P, Krizanauskiene A, Bensch S, Palinauskas V, Asghar M, Dimitrov D, Scebba S, Valkiūnas G: A new morphologically distinct avian malaria parasite that fails detection by established polymerase chain reaction-based protocols for amplification of the cytochrome b gene. J Parasitol. 2012, 98 (3): 657-665. 10.1645/GE-3006.1.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  59. 59.

    D’Amico VL, Baker AJ: A rare case of Plasmodium (Haemamoeba) relictum infection in a free-living Red Knot (Calidris canutus rufa, Scolopacidae). J Ornithol. 2010, 151 (4): 951-954. 10.1007/s10336-010-0566-0.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  60. 60.

    Palinauskas V, Kosarev V, Shapoval A, Bensch S, Valkiūnas G: Comparison of mitochondrial cytochrome b lineages and morphospecies of two avian malaria parasites of the subgenera Haemamoeba and Giovannolaia (Haemosporida : Plasmodiidae). Zootaxa. 2007, 1626: 39-50.

    Google Scholar 

  61. 61.

    Valkiūnas G, Zehtindjiev P, Dimitrov D, Krizanauskiene A, Iezhova TA, Bensch S: Polymerase chain reaction-based identification of Plasmodium (Huffia) elongatum, with remarks on species identity of haemosporidian lineages deposited in GenBank. Parasitol Res. 2008, 102 (6): 1185-1193. 10.1007/s00436-008-0892-9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  62. 62.

    Roiz D, Vazquez A, Rosà R, Muñoz J, Arnoldi D, Rosso F, Figuerola J, Tenorio A, Rizzoli A: Blood meal analysis, flavivirus screening, and influence of meteorological variables on the dynamics of potential mosquito vectors of West Nile virus in northern Italy. J Vector Ecol. 2012, 37 (1): 20-28. 10.1111/j.1948-7134.2012.00196.x.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  63. 63.

    Balenghien T, Fouque F, Sabatier P, Bicout DJ: Horse-, bird-, and human-seeking behavior and seasonal abundance of mosquitoes in a West Nile virus focus of southern France. J Med Entomol. 2006, 43 (5): 936-946. 10.1603/0022-2585(2006)43[936:HBAHBA]2.0.CO;2.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  64. 64.

    Bogojević MS, Merdić E, Turić N, Jeličić Ž, Zahirović Ž, Vrućina I, Merdić S: Seasonal dynamics of mosquitoes (Diptera: Culicidae) in Osijek (Croatia) for the period 1995–2004. Biologia (Bratisl). 2009, 64 (4): 760-767. 10.2478/s11756-009-0138-z.

    Google Scholar 

  65. 65.

    Madder DJ, Surgeoner GA, Helson BV: Number of generations, egg production, and developmental time of Culex pipiens and Culex restuans (Diptera: Culicidae) in Southern Ontario. J Med Entomol. 1983, 20 (3): 275-287.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  66. 66.

    Darbro JM, Harrington LC: Bird-baited traps for surveillance of West Nile mosquito vectors: Effect of bird species, trap height, and mosquito escape rates. J Med Entomol. 2006, 43 (1): 83-92. 10.1603/0022-2585(2006)043[0083:BTFSOW]2.0.CO;2.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  67. 67.

    Anderson JF, Andreadis TG, Main AJ, Kline DL: Prevalence of West Nile virus in tree canopy-inhabiting Culex pipiens and associated mosquitoes. Am J Trop Med Hyg. 2004, 71 (1): 112-119.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  68. 68.

    Vinogradova EB: Mosquitoes Culex pipiens pipiens: taxonomy, distribution, ecology, physiology, genetics, applied importance and control. 2000, Sofia: PenSoft

    Google Scholar 

  69. 69.

    Deichmeister JM, Telang A: Abundance of West Nile virus mosquito vectors in relation to climate and landscape variables. J Vector Ecol. 2011, 36 (1): 75-85. 10.1111/j.1948-7134.2011.00143.x.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  70. 70.

    Gillespie B, Belton P: Oviposition of Culex pipiens in water at different temperatures. J Entomol Soc BC. 1980, 77: 34-36.

    Google Scholar 

  71. 71.

    Wang J, Ogden NH, Zhu H: The impact of weather conditions on Culex pipiens and Culex restuans (Diptera: Culicidae) abundance: a case study in Peel region. J Med Entomol. 2011, 48 (2): 468-475. 10.1603/ME10117.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  72. 72.

    Gu W, Novak RJ: Statistical estimation of degree days of mosquito development under fluctuating temperatures in the field. J Vector Ecol. 2006, 31 (1): 107-112. 10.3376/1081-1710(2006)31[107:SEODDO]2.0.CO;2.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  73. 73.

    Ejiri H, Sato Y, Kim KS, Hara T, Tsuda Y, Imura T, Murata K, Yukawa M: Entomological study on transmission of avian malaria parasites in a zoological garden in Japan: bloodmeal identification and detection of avian malaria parasite DNA from blood-fed mosquitoes. J Med Entomol. 2011, 48 (3): 600-607. 10.1603/ME10197.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  74. 74.

    Kilpatrick AM, Kramer LD, Jones MJ, Marra PP, Daszak P: West Nile virus epidemics in North America are driven by shifts in mosquito feeding behavior. PLoS Biol. 2006, 4 (4): e82-10.1371/journal.pbio.0040082.

    PubMed Central  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  75. 75.

    Kent R, Juliusson L, Weissmann M, Evans S, Komar N: Seasonal blood-feeding behavior of Culex tarsalis (Diptera: Culicidae) in Weld County, Colorado, 2007. J Med Entomol. 2009, 46 (2): 380-390. 10.1603/033.046.0226.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  76. 76.

    Hamer GL, Kitron UD, Goldberg TL, Brawn JD, Loss SR, Ruiz MO, Hayes DB, Walker ED: Host selection by Culex pipiens mosquitoes and West Nile Virus amplification. Am J Trop Med Hyg. 2009, 80 (2): 268-278.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  77. 77.

    Valkiūnas G: Avian malaria parasites and other haemosporidia. 2005, Boca Raton: CRC Press

    Google Scholar 

  78. 78.

    Beadell JS, Covas R, Gebhard C, Ishtiaq F, Melo M, Schmidt BK, Perkins SL, Graves GR, Fleischer RC: Host associations and evolutionary relationships of avian blood parasites from west Africa. Int J Parasitol. 2009, 39 (2): 257-266. 10.1016/j.ijpara.2008.06.005.

    PubMed Central  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  79. 79.

    Dimitrov D, Zehtindjiev P, Bensch S: Genetic diversity of avian blood parasites in SE Europe: Cytochrome b lineages of the genera Plasmodium and Haemoproteus (Haemosporida) from Bulgaria. Acta Parasitol. 2010, 55 (3): 201-209. 10.2478/s11686-010-0029-z.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  80. 80.

    Ventim R, Morais J, Pardal S, Mendes L, Ramos JA, Pérez-tris J: Host-parasite associations and host-specificity in haemoparasites of reed bed passerines. Parasitology. 2012, 139 (03): 310-316. 10.1017/S0031182011002083.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  81. 81.

    Szöllösi E, Cichon M, Eens M, Hasselquist D, Kempenaers B, Merino S, Nilsson JA, Rosivall B, Rytkonen S, Toerek J: Determinants of distribution and prevalence of avian malaria in blue tit populations across Europe: separating host and parasite effects. J Evol Biol. 2011, 24 (9): 2014-2024. 10.1111/j.1420-9101.2011.02339.x.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  82. 82.

    Peréz-Tris J, Bensch S: Dispersal increases local transmission of avian malarial parasites. Ecol Lett. 2005, 8 (8): 838-845. 10.1111/j.1461-0248.2005.00788.x.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  83. 83.

    Ferrer ES, García-Navas V, Sanz JJ, Ortego J: Molecular characterization of avian malaria parasites in three Mediterranean blue tit (Cyanistes caeruleus) populations. Parasitol Res. 2012, 111 (5): 2137-2142. 10.1007/s00436-012-3062-z.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  84. 84.

    Lacorte GA, Félix GM, Pinheiro RR, Chaves AV, Almeida-Neto G, Neves FS, Leite LO, Santos FR, Braga ÉM: Exploring the diversity and distribution of neotropical avian malaria parasites – a molecular survey from Southeast Brazil. PLoS One. 2013, 8 (3): e57770-10.1371/journal.pone.0057770.

    PubMed Central  CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  85. 85.

    Paul REL, Nu VT, Krettli AU, Brey PT: Interspecific competition during transmission of two sympatric malaria parasite species to the mosquito vector. Proc R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 2002, 269 (1509): 2551-2557. 10.1098/rspb.2002.2171.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  86. 86.

    Gupta S, Swinton J, Anderson RM: Theoretical studies of the effects of heterogeneity in the parasite population on the transmission dynamics of malaria. Proc R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 1994, 256 (1347): 231-238. 10.1098/rspb.1994.0075.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  87. 87.

    Detinova TS: Age grouping methods in Diptera of medical importance with special reference to some vectors of malaria. 1962, Geneva: World Health Organization

    Google Scholar 

  88. 88.

    Vanderberg JP, Yoeli M: Effects of temperature on sporogonic development of Plasmodium berghei. J Parasitol. 1966, 52 (3): 559-564. 10.2307/3276326.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  89. 89.

    Ball GH, Chao J: Temperature stresses on the mosquito phase of Plasmodium relictum. J Parasitol. 1964, 50 (6): 748-752. 10.2307/3276196.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  90. 90.

    LaPointe DA, Goff ML, Atkinson CT: Thermal constraints to the sporogonic development and altitudinal distribution of avian malaria Plasmodium relictum in Hawai’i. J Parasitol. 2010, 96 (2): 318-324. 10.1645/GE-2290.1.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references


This study was founded by the Swiss national Science foundation, grants 31003A-120479 and 31003A-138187. We are very grateful to Alexandre Chausson, Danilo Foresti, Léo Gaillard, Laura Galbiati and Aude Rogivue for help to collect mosquito egg rafts, as well as Jessica Delhaye, Tania Jenkins and two anonymous reviewers for valuable comments on the manuscript.

Author information



Corresponding author

Correspondence to Olivier Glaizot.

Additional information

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Authors’ contributions

FL, OG and PC conceived and designed the study. FL and AD collected the data. FL analysed the data. All authors participated to the writing of the paper. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Electronic supplementary material


Additional file 1: Figure S1: Relationship between cumulated densities of egg rafts and cumulated densities of gravid C. pipiens females. Densities of egg rafts (mean weekly egg rafts per container per collection date) and densities of gravid female C. pipiens (mean weekly gravid C. pipiens per trap per date) were cumulated over the sampling weeks. Cumulated values are presented on a log scale. N = 26 sampling weeks throughout the season survey (April-September 2011). The regression line (grey dotted line) has the following equation y = 0.96× – 1.02 and R2 = 0.99. (PDF 219 KB)

Authors’ original submitted files for images

Below are the links to the authors’ original submitted files for images.

Authors’ original file for figure 1

Authors’ original file for figure 2

Authors’ original file for figure 3

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License ( ), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Lalubin, F., Delédevant, A., Glaizot, O. et al. Temporal changes in mosquito abundance (Culex pipiens), avian malaria prevalence and lineage composition. Parasites Vectors 6, 307 (2013).

Download citation


  • Culex pipiens
  • Plasmodium relictum
  • Plasmodium vaughani
  • Temporal parasite community
  • Seasonality
  • Vector-borne disease