Skip to main content

Table 1 Summary of statistics comparing the fecundity of Wolbachia -infected and uninfected Ae. aegypti

From: Transinfected Wolbachia have minimal effects on male reproductive success in Aedes aegypti

Male larval nutrition

Line 1

Line 2

t

df

P

Holm-Bonferroni α

Low

POPO

WTWT

−5.208

149.789

0.000

0.005

POWT

WTWT

−6.447

143.388

0.000

0.005

MOWT

WTWT

−5.731

143.918

0.000

0.006

MOMO

WTWT

−6.069

142.731

0.000

0.007

MOWT

POPO

−0.876

142.470

0.382

0.008

MOMO

POPO

−0.740

142.995

0.460

0.010

POPO

POWT

0.610

146.934

0.543

0.012

MOWT

POWT

−0.414

128.308

0.680

0.017

MOMO

POWT

−0.212

140.967

0.833

0.025

MOMO

MOWT

0.209

135.443

0.835

0.050

High

POPO

WTWT

−6.434

197.020

0.000

0.005

POWT

WTWT

−5.771

205.069

0.000

0.005

MOWT

POPO

3.864

182.960

0.000

0.006

MOMO

WTWT

−3.401

184.690

0.001

0.007

MOMO

POPO

3.415

183.289

0.001

0.008

MOWT

WTWT

−3.259

179.891

0.001

0.010

MOWT

POWT

3.077

197.993

0.002

0.012

MOMO

POWT

2.687

195.237

0.008

0.017

MOMO

MOWT

−0.284

166.015

0.777

0.025

POPO

POWT

−0.773

214.391

0.441

0.050

  1. MGYP2.out females x MGYP2.out males (MOMO), MGYP2.out females x wild-type males (MOWT), A.PGYP1.out females x A.PGYP1.out male (POPO), A.PGYP1.out females x wild-type males (POWT) and wild-type males x wild-type females (WTWT). Unequal variance t-test is significant if P < Holm-Bonferroni α.