Skip to main content

Field trial on a novel control method for the dengue vector, Aedes aegypti by the systematic use of Olyset® Net and pyriproxyfen in Southern Vietnam



Jars, tanks, and drums provide favorable rearing/breeding sites for Aedes aegypti in Vietnam. However, the use of insecticides to control mosquitoes at such breeding sites has not been approved in Vietnam since they are also often sources of drinking water, making larval vector control difficult. Mosquito nets pre-treated with long-lasting insecticide treated nets (LLITNs) form an effective measure for malaria control. We examined changes in the abundance of immature Aedes aegypti to evaluate the efficacy of covering ceramic jars with lids comprising one type of LLITN, Olyset® Net, in inhibiting oviposition by adult females, and to evaluate the effect of treating other breeding containers, such as flower vases, inside and around the outside of houses with a slow-release pyriproxyfen formulation to kill pupae.


We selected 313 households for the trial and 363 households for the control in Tan Chanh, Long An province, Vietnam. In the trial area, Olyset® Net lids were used to cover five major types of water container (ceramic jars, cylindrical concrete tanks, other concrete tanks, plastic drums, and plastic buckets), while pyriproxyfen was used to treat flower vases and ant traps. We also monitored dengue virus transmission by measuring anti-dengue IgM and IgG levels in healthy residents in both control and trial areas to estimate the effectiveness of Olyset® Net at controlling the dengue vector, Aedes aegypti.


The container-index and house-index for immature Ae. aegypti fell steeply one month after treatment in the trial area. Lids with Olyset® Net that fit container openings clearly seemed to reduce the presence of immature Ae. aegypti as the density of pupae decreased 1 month after treatment in the trial area. Pyriproxyfen was also effective at killing pupae in the water containers in the trial area. Although the dengue seroconversion rate was not influenced by Olyset® Net, it was lower in two-five year old children when compared to older children and adults in both control and trial areas.


Our study showed that the treatment by Olyset® Net and pyriproxyfen had a strong negative effect on the prevalence of immature Ae. aegypti, which persisted for at least 5 months after treatment.


Dengue is a mosquito-borne disease of increasing public health importance, with over 2.5 billion people at risk globally [1]. More than 100 tropical countries have endemic dengue infections. Dengue hemorrhagic fever (DHF) was first reported in Manila, Philippines, in the early 1950s. It rapidly became an epidemic and spread throughout Southeast Asia within 20 years [2]. Dengue and DHF are primarily urban viral diseases of the tropics, in which the viruses are maintained in a cycle that involves humans and Aedes aegypti, a domestic, day-biting mosquito that prefers to feed on humans [3]. As a vaccine for dengue has not yet been developed, controlling its vector in and around the home, where most of the transmission occurs, is the only effective preventive measure currently available. However, spraying insecticides is not an effective way to kill adult mosquitoes unless they are used indoors [4]. The effective way to control Ae. aegypti is larval resource reduction, i.e. elimination or cleaning of water containers as habitats for larvae [5].

Dengue fever first appeared in Vietnam in 1959, in Hanoi and Haiphong, and since then has become endemic throughout the country [6]. Poor rural communities in southern Vietnam, like those in other developing countries that do not have access to piped water, have relied mainly on rainwater harvesting systems [7]. In rural areas in Vietnam, water for household use is often stored in 50–2,000 litre containers, most of which are not insect-proof and therefore provide suitable development sites for immature Ae. aegypti[8]. Furthermore, even when alternative water supply infrastructure in the form of large tanks, piped water and household taps become available, householders in communities having piped water systems typically still retain their existing water storage containers (mainly 100–200 litre jars), because the piped water supply is not always reliable [8]. Ceramic jars, tanks, and drums provide suitable rearing/breeding sites for Ae. aegypti in Vietnam [6, 9, 10]. Treatment of such breeding sites with insecticides based on organophosphates or insect growth regulators, some of which are recommended for the treatment of drinking water by WHO, seems to be the best and most convenient measure. However, the use of insecticides to control mosquitoes at their breeding sites has not been approved for the treatment of drinking water in Vietnam, which uses community-based biological control strategies for this purpose, for example, by the use of the copepod, Mesocyclops[6, 11, 12]. However, this form of control is lost from containers when all the water is used up or the containers are cleaned [13], which then makes larval vector control difficult. Therefore, alternative measures are necessary, especially when mosquito control by Mesocyclops fails.

While it is important to render rearing habitats unusable for immature stages in the control of dengue vector mosquitoes, it is perhaps even more important to prevent gravid females from entering breeding habitats (e.g. containers) in the first place. There have been a few studies in which vector populations have been successfully suppressed by covering the breeding containers [14], thereby creating a physical barrier that prevents female mosquitoes from entering the containers [15]. In addition, mosquito nets treated with synthetic pyrethroids have proved to be a successful intervention tool for malaria [1619] and other vector-borne diseases [20] such as dengue [14, 21].

Olyset® Net was developed as a bed-net to protect people from being bitten by malaria vectors [22, 23]. For example, surveys in India showed a 45.7% reduction in malaria prevalence in villages using Olyset® Net [23]. Olyset® Net was also effective for the control of Ae. aegypti[24]. This long-lasting insecticidal net can often remain effective for over 5 years in the home [17].

The purpose of our study was to determine whether the study of covering the lids of domestic water storage containers with Olyset® Net would help in controlling Ae. aegypti in southern Vietnam where over 80% of dengue cases of the country are reported each year, and where Ae. aegypti may be more abundant than in the northern and central parts of Vietnam [11]. Flower vases and ant traps are also important breeding sites for Ae. aegypti[7, 25]. In addition, we tested the effectiveness of applying an insect growth regulator to flower vases and ant traps inside and around the outside of houses. Finally, we examined the abundance of immature Ae. aegypti before and after intervention, and also compared the change in abundance between the trial and control areas.


Study site

Tan Chanh, a commune of Can Duoc district in Long An province, is located 30 km south of Ho Chi Minh City, Vietnam. It has two distinct seasons. The rainy season starts in May and ends in November, and the dry season begins in December and lasts until April. Tan Chanh’s seven hamlets contain 300 to 400 houses each and a population of 1,400 to 2,000, giving the commune a total of around 12,000 residents in 2,540 houses. There were 30 dengue patients in 2007 and 104 in 2008 from this commune [26, 27].

Tan Chanh is located along the Vam Co river and near a seaport. The water in the rivers and canals in the commune is saline from December to June and is fresh from July to November. The Government of Vietnam has committed to providing rural communities with increased access to safe water through a variety of household water supply schemes including wells, water tanks and ceramic jars, and tap water schemes [28]. The tap water is actually supplied by a private company, and is not sufficient for all the residents for their daily use and furthermore, is sometimes stopped. The locals also typically cannot afford to dig their own wells. Therefore, they become resourceful and collect rain-water and store it in 100–200 litre ceramic jars and big tanks.


Insecticides were presented in two media, the first being a controlled-release, plastic net impregnated with 2% permethrin (Olyset® Net). The second medium was the EcoBio-Block® S, a novel controlled-release system for the insect growth regulator, pyriproxyfen. Each block is composed of a porous volcanic rock and cement into which the aerobic groups of Bacillus subtilis natto are incorporated as a water purifying agent [29]. Specifically, each EcoBio-Block® S was produced by mixing neutralized cement (40.6% w/w), aggregate (pumice stone, 52.1% w/w), a mixture of aerobic bacteria and nutrient medium (4.1% w/w), and 0.5% granular formulation of pyriproxyfen (Sumilarv® 0.5 G, Shinto Fine Co., Ltd., Osaka, Japan, 3.2% w/w). The content of pyriproxyfen in the block was 0.016% (w/w).

Study design

We selected one hamlet (313 households in total) as a trial area and two hamlets (363 households in total) as a control area (which received no interventions) in Tan Chanh commune. In the trial area, five major water containers (ceramic jars, cylindrical concrete tank, other concrete tanks except for those set in toilets, plastic drums, and plastic buckets) were covered with lids fitted with Olyset® Net in early September, 2008 (Figure 1). A 30 × 150-cm piece of net was tied around the circumference of the lid. Additionally, ant traps and flower vases inside and around the outside of houses were treated with EcoBio-Block® S pyriproxyfen by crushing a block into small pieces (less than 1 cubic cm) and putting them in the container at the rate of approximately 1 g per 1 liter of water.

Figure 1

Metal water jar lids covered with Olyset ® Net.

Entomologic survey

Mosquito populations were assessed before treatment, and one, three and five months after treatment in the selected houses of control and trial areas. All the houses were numbered in the control and trial areas, and 71 houses were randomly selected in August and 50 houses in October, December, and February. The assessment entailed collecting immature mosquitoes inside and outside houses as described in Tsuzuki et al. [10]. Briefly, ceramic jars, concrete basins, and toilet concrete basins were sampled by sweeping through them five times with a small net [30], and small containers were upturned to collect pupae. All water-holding containers both indoors and outdoors, were inspected only after obtaining the necessary permission from the occupants. The house index, container index, and the number of pupae from the trial and control houses were compared to determine the efficacy of the insecticides. Containers with one or more Ae. aegypti immatures were defined as immature positive containers. The lids (covers) were examined from all the water storage containers in the selected households and were categorized into three types; no lid (NL), a lid with a gap or an opening through which the water surface in the containers was visible (GL), a lid that fitted an opening (FL). A sample of the pupae collected was examined in the laboratory and allowed to develop into adult mosquitoes, which were then identified by species and sex.

Monitoring of dengue virus transmission

Dengue virus transmission was monitored at both control and trial areas. Households with more than five family members were selected and 2 ml blood samples collected twice from each healthy family member between the age of 2 and 65 years. Preliminary observations showed that only large families (with more than five members) used jars or concrete tanks to store water. From the trial area, 301 and 222 blood samples were collected in September 2008 and February 2009, respectively. A total of 352 and 286 blood samples were collected at the control area in September 2008 and February 2009, respectively. Since there was a delay in the processing of the application to collect blood samples at the Ministry of Health in Vietnam, the first blood collection was one month after the beginning of the trial. Written informed consent was obtained from all participants. All serum specimens were subjected to in-house IgG and IgM capture enzyme linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) [31, 32] and indirect IgG-ELISA at 1:100 and 1:400 dilution ratios, respectively, using tetravalent dengue virus antigen for determination of seroconversion rates in populations from both control and trial areas. Seroconversion was determined by positive conversion of the second blood sample after IgM ELISA or a four-fold elevation of IgG titre of the second blood sample, when compared to the first blood sample. All possible dengue cases were reported to the Virology Department, Pasteur Institute Ho Chi Minh City from August 2008 to February 2009.


The study protocol was reviewed and approved by both the Scientific and Ethics Committees of the Pasteur Institute, Ho Chi Minh City, and the Ethics Committee of the Institute of Tropical Medicine, Nagasaki University. Written informed consent was obtained from all the participants for the collection of the samples and their subsequent analysis. Participation by children required consent from at least one parent and the child’s assent. The children and their families from whom blood was taken were insured for six months.

Statistical analysis

We examined the association between the response variable, abundance (presence/absence) of immature Ae. aegypti and explanatory variables, area (control/trial) and state of lid (NL, GL, FL; see Entomological Survey above). Multivariate logistic regression modeling was used to calculate odds ratios and 95% confidence intervals (95% CIs). We also used multivariate logistic regression modeling to examine the serology conversion. Explanatory variables were area (control/trial), age (two to five years old/over five years) and gender (male/female). We constructed the full model including all combinations of interactions and sequentially eliminated an interaction and/or variable, based on the Akaike Information criterion (AIC) value. When the best model included an interaction, analyses were stratified by area or gender. Multicollinearity was assessed by using the variance inflation factor and a variance inflation factor greater than 5.0 was considered to be a possible cause for concern [33].

The number of pupae per container was loge transformed to the normal after adding 0.5 to all the values, prior to statistical analysis [34]. The number of pupae per container within each month was tested using ANOVA where area and the state of lid were included as effects.

The G-test for independence was used to compare the frequency of lid type between trial and control areas and to test the effect of pyriproxyfen on the number of pupae. All statistical analyses were performed using the R statistical software 2.6.2 [35].


Comparison of entomological indices between trial and control areas

We examined 3,869 containers in the trial area and 4,198 in the control area from August 2008 to February 2009 (Table 1). Ceramic jars were the most common containers (78.9-82.4% in the trial area and 81.3-98.4% in the control), followed by plastic drums and ant traps in both areas. Five major types of water container (ceramic jar, cylindrical concrete tank, other concrete tank, plastic drum, and plastic bucket) made up 92.0% (n=811) of all containers in the trial area in October, 94.7% (n=874) in December, and 92.1% (n=727) in February. The relative percentages of clay bowls, gardening pots, concrete toilet tanks, and discarded containers were low in both areas.

Table 1 Relative percentages of various container types observed in Tan Chanh commune from August 2008 to February 2009

The Container Index in the trial area gradually decreased from October to February (Figure 2B), when compared to the CI in the control area (Figure 2A), except for the cylindrical concrete tanks in February. The total container index in the trial area decreased in October and continued to be under 20% until February.

Figure 2

Container index of various containers for the period August 2008 to February 2009. (A) Trial area. (B) Control area. The treatment was carried out in September, 2008.

The house index (HI) of the trial area was higher than that of the control area in August, in general (Figure 3). The HI of the trial area suddenly decreased in October and gradually increased from December to February, whereas the HI of the control area increased gradually from August to December.

Figure 3

House index in trial (squares) and control (circles) areas from August 2008 to February 2009. The numbers of houses examined are given in parentheses. The treatment was carried out in September, 2008.

Effect of lid and insecticide treatment

The proportion of containers with fitted lids in the trial area (36.6%) was lower than that in the control area (49.6%) in August. However, the proportion of fitted lids was higher in the trial area (78.5-81.3%) than in the control area (38.9-55.5%), from October to February. Most of residents used lids with Olyset® Net properly in the trial area, although some did not use lids at all or used them inappropriately despite of instructions.

The numbers of positive containers with Aedes immature stages were higher in the trial area than in control area in August (Table 2). However, they were lower in the trial area when FL and even GL lids were used, when compared to the control area. The final model was different between August and October on the one hand, and December and February on the other, because of the significant interaction between the area and state of lid in December and February (Table 3a, b). In August and October, the main effects of area and lid were important determinants of the presence of Aedes immature stages. Although the odds ratio of the trial area was 70% higher than that of the control area before treatment (August), it reduced to 70% after treatment (October). The odds ratio of the GL lids was 30% lower than that of the FL lids in August, although it was 30% higher than that of the FL lids in October. Likewise, in comparison with FL, the odds ratio of no lids (NL) increased from 1.3 in August to 2.7 in October. As the model to best explain the data for December and February incorporated the interaction of the area and state of lid, the odds ratio was calculated separately by area. In both areas, odds ratios of containers with GL lids and NL containers were at least 80% higher than those of containers with FL lids. The odds ratio of NL containers was 5.0 in the trial area in December and 5.6 in the control area in February.

Table 2 The percentages of positive containers (for the presence of Aedes immature stages) listed by lid type for each month in the trial and control areas from August to February
Table 3 The relative risk, as given by the odds-ratio, for the lid types and areas for the presence of Aedes immature stages in (a) August and October and (b) December and February

The number of containers not treated with Olyset® Net ranged from three to 36 (Table 4). In the trial area, containers with Olyset® Net had a significantly lower percentage of Aedes immature stages positive than those with no Olyset® Net in October. The probability of the presence of Aedes immature stages was also significantly different between containers with Olyset® Net and those without Olyset® Net, when December and February were considered together.

Table 4 Effect of Olyset® Net on the presence of Aedes immature stages in (a) October, (b) December and February

The number of pupae per container decreased for all three states of lid in the trial area in October (Figure 4A). On the other hand, the density of pupae in containers with GL lids as well as the NL containers increased in October in the control area (Figure 4B). ANOVA revealed a significant effect of the type of lid on the number of pupae per container, each month. The main effect of area was significant only in August (P<0.01). The main effect of lid type was significant in all months at least at the 5% level. The two-way interactions were significant only in February (P<0.05). The density of pupae collected from the fit lid was under 0.1 per container in the trial area and under 0.2 per container in the control area from October to February. However, in the trial area, the density of the pupae in the containers with GL lids increased in December and reached to 0.76 per container in February. The ANOVA results also showed that interaction between area and lid was significant only in February.

Figure 4

A comparison of the density (mean±S.E.) of pupae among different types of containers: those with no lid (NL), with gapped lids (GL), and with fitted lids (FL) from August 2008 to February 2009. (A) Trial area. (B) Control area. The treatment was carried out in September, 2008.

Effect of IGR

More pupae were dead in the trial area (n=81) than in the control area (n=9) after treatment. There was no difference between the trial and control areas in the effect of pyriproxyfen on the number of live Aedes pupae before treatment. There were no dead pupae in containers without pyriproxyfen in the trial area, since some resident forgot to keep pyriproxyfen in flower vases and ant traps. The containers treated with pyriproxyfen saw significant reduction in the number of pupae that would emerge into adults when compared to those with no treatment (χ2test; P<0.001).

Dengue virus transmission

Seroprevalence rates of anti-dengue IgM and IgG in the healthy residents were not significantly different between the trial and control areas. Dengue seroconversion was observed in 23 (62.2%) of 37 seronegative cases in the trial area and in 44 of 59 (74.6%) seronegative cases in the control area. A model with age as the only explanatory variable was the best one (P=0.03), which means that neither area (control/trial) nor gender (male/female) showed an effect on dengue seroconversion in our study. The dengue seroconversion rate in children 2–5 years old was lower than in those over 5 years old (Table 5). The odds ratio of these was 0.25 (95% CI: 0.07-0.88), indicating that the risk of dengue in 2–5 year olds was a quarter of that for those over 5 years.

Table 5 Dengue seroconversion rate at the trial and control areas


Our study showed that Olyset® Net and pyriproxyfen was successful in the control of Ae. aegypti immature stages, although seroprevalence rates were not significantly different between the trial and control areas. While more containers had immature mosquitoes in the trial area than in the control area before treatment, the number of positive containers and the number of pupae in the trial area were both less than in the control area after Olyset® Net and pyriproxyfen treatment, which suggests that the suppression of mosquitoes can be attributed to the treatments tested.

The container types favorable for Ae. aegypti immature stages can be dramatically different among local areas [3638]. The ceramic jar was the main container to store rain water and the most important breeding container for Ae. aegypti in Tan Chanh. Compared to other provinces, the prevalence, i.e. the proportion among all the containers, and the container index of ceramic jars is higher in southern Vietnam [9, 25]. In our study, the prevalence of ceramic jars was more than 80% and its container index was 35% before intervention in the trial area of Tan Chanh. However, the prevalence and container index of ceramic jars were 30.2% and 26.0%, respectively, in Hanoi City (northern Vietnam) [9] and 5.9% and 16.3% in Nha Trang City (central Vietnam) [9, 25]. Thus, it is important to suppress immature stages mainly in ceramic jars as the dengue control strategy in southern Vietnam.

People in southern Vietnam store water because of the unreliable water supply and/or distaste for tap water [8]. In many areas throughout Vietnam the contribution of poorly designed or maintained water tanks to Ae. aegypti proliferation is well recognized [39]. However, as it is difficult to drain the heavy containers completely, a small amount of water invariably remained at the bottom of some ceramic jars in Tan Chanh, underscoring a practical difficulty, even though the jar is recognized as a breeding habitat of vector mosquitoes by the locals.

Unfortunately, most of villagers prefer not to cover their water containers, and furthermore, the government supplies insufficient number of lids for outdoor containers [37]. Our results indicate that containers with FL lids, which ensured a complete cover over the opening, was effective in reducing the positive rate of containers with Aedes immature stages. However, more covered ceramic jars were infected with Ae. aegypti immature stages than uncovered ones located outdoors [15]. Gravid Ae. aegypti are known to find small gaps between the lid and the lip of the ceramic jars, as seen with those that were covered by an unmodified commercial aluminum lid in four of six trials in laboratory cages [40]. In our study, the density of pupae in containers with GL lids in the trial area was the highest in February. These results suggest that GL lids attract gravid females, which then lay eggs inside the container, as GL lids make more shade than NL lids.

In a laboratory test, Olyset® Net reduced landing attempts of mosquitoes and increased the flying time [41], which suggests that the Olyset® Net operates as a repellent. Our results showed that Olyset® Net reduced the number of positive containers with Aedes immature stages, which suggests that females avoided laying eggs in containers with Olyset® Net.

The percentage of properly used insecticide-treated (IT) covers was high for 5 months in the trial area in our study. A study in Cambodia shows that when about 88% of IT cover was used properly, a 58% reduction in the pupa per person index was shown at 13 weeks after treatment [21]. Researchers did not find a significant effect of IT covers on entomological indices in north-west Venezuela because the usage of IT cover was low [42]. In light of this study, our findings suggest that a widespread and proper use of IT covers is critical for the suppression of Ae. aegypti.

In addition to IT covers, we used pyriproxyfen, insect growth regulator (IGR), in flower vases and ant traps in the trial area. In Vietnam, people offer flowers on an altar on the first and fifteenth days of the lunar calendar. It takes 13 days for Ae. aegypti to develop in a temperature range of 20-27°C [43]. As the average lowest temperature is 22°C in Ho Chi Minh City [44], adult mosquitoes may emerge before the next floral tribute. Therefore, it is necessary to add IGR to the flower vase when people change water, or the water needs to be cleaned or exchanged at least once in the 15 day interval.

Dengue infection rates among young children and women have sometimes been higher than in older children and adult males [45, 46]. Our monitoring of anti-dengue IgM and IgG in healthy residents in both control and trial area revealed seroconverted cases in both the trial and control area. A lower seroconversion rate in the trial area was evident in children 2–5 years old but there were no clear differences between the men and women of our study, which indicates that our treatment was effective on young children since they stay home most of the time. The seroconversion rates at the trial area were lower than the rates observed in the control area but not enough to be statistically significant. Further research is needed to clarify exactly how human age and gender are related to the seroconversion rate.


In summary, we fixed Olyset® Net to the lids of water containers to reduce the density of immature Ae. aegypti, since the use of insecticides to control mosquitoes at their breeding sites has not been approved for the treatment of drinking water in Vietnam. Pyriproxyfen, an insect growth regulator, was also applied to small water containers such as flower vases to kill mosquito pupae. Our study showed that use of Olyset® Net and pyriproxyfen provided effective control of Ae. aegypti and an intact lid also contributed to the reduction of the density of Ae. aegypti, which can lead to the suppression of dengue epidemics.


  1. 1.

    Gubler DJ: Epidemic dengue/dengue hemorrhagic fever as a public health, social and economic problem in the 21st century. Trends Microbiol. 2002, 10: 100-3. 10.1016/S0966-842X(01)02288-0.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. 2.

    World Health Organization: Dengue hemorrhagic fever, diagnosis, treatment and control. 1986, Geneva: WHO

    Google Scholar 

  3. 3.

    Gubler DJ, Clark GG: Dengue/dengue hemorrhagic fever: the emergence of a global health problem. Emerg Infect Dis. 1995, 1: 55-7. 10.3201/eid0102.950204.

    PubMed Central  CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. 4.

    Newton EA, Reiter P: A model of the transmission of dengue fever with an evaluation of the impact of ultra-low volume (ULV) insecticide applications on dengue epidemics. Am J Trop Med Hyg. 1992, 47: 709-20.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. 5.

    Gubler DJ: Aedes aegypti and Aedes aegypti-borne disease control in the 1990s: top down or bottom up. Charles Franklin Craig Lecture. Am J Trop Med Hyg. 1989, 40: 571-8.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. 6.

    Nam VS, Yen NT, Holynska M, Reid JW, Kay BH: National progress in dengue vector control in Vietnam: survey for Mesocyclops (Copepoda), Micronecta (Corixidae), and fish as biological control agents. Am J Trop Med Hyg. 2000, 62: 5-10.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. 7.

    Nguyen LAP, Clements ACA, Jeffery JAL, Yen NT, Nam VS, Vaughanm G, Shinkfield R, Kutcher SC, Gatton ML, Kay BH, Ryan PA: Abundance and prevalence of Aedes aegypti immatures and relationships with household water strage in rural areas in southern Viet Nam. Int Health. 2011, 3: 115-125. 10.1016/j.inhe.2010.11.002.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. 8.

    Tran HP, Adams J, Jeffery ALJ, Nguyen YT, Vu SN, Kutcher CS, Kay BH, Ryan PA: Householder perspectives and preferences on water storage and use, with reference to dengue, in the Mekong Delta, southern Vietnam. Int Health. 2010, 2: 136-142. 10.1016/j.inhe.2009.12.007.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. 9.

    Phong TV, Nam VS: Key breeding sites of dengue vectors in Hanoi, Vietnam, 1994–1997. Dengue Bull. 1999, 23: 67-72.

    Google Scholar 

  10. 10.

    Tsuzuki A, Huynh T, Tsunoda T, Luu L, Kawada H, Takagi M: Effect of existing practices on reducing Aedes aegypti pre-adults in key breeding containers in Ho Chi Minh City, Vietnam. Am J Trop Med Hyg. 2009, 80: 752-7.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. 11.

    Nam VS, Yen NT, Duc HM, Tu TC, Thang VT, Le NH, San LH, Loan LL, Huong VTQ, Khanh LHK, Trang HTT, Lam LZ, Kutcher SC, Aaskov JG, Jeffery JA, Ryan PA, Kay BH: Community-based control of Aedes aegypti by using Mesocyclops in southern Vietnam. Am J Trop Med Hyg. 2012, 86: 850-9. 10.4269/ajtmh.2012.11-0466.

    PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  12. 12.

    Nam VS, Yen NT, Kay BH, Marten GG, Reid JW: Eradication of Aedes aegypti from a village in Vietnam, using copepods and community participation. Am J Trop Med Hyg. 1998, 59: 657-60.

    Google Scholar 

  13. 13.

    Marten GG, Borjas G, Cush M, Fernandez E, Reid JW: Control of larval Aedes aegypti (Diptera: Culicidae) by cyclopoid copepods in peridomestic breeding containers. J Med Entomol. 1994, 31: 36-44.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. 14.

    Kroeger A, Lenhart A, Ochoa M, Villegas E, Levy M, Alexander N, McCall PJ: Effective control of dengue vectors with curtains and water container covers treated with insecticide in Mexico and Venezuela: cluster randomised trials. BMJ. 2006, 332: 1247-52. 10.1136/bmj.332.7552.1247.

    PubMed Central  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. 15.

    Kittayapong P, Strickman D: Distribution of container-inhabiting Aedes larvae (Diptera: Culicidae) at a dengue focus in Thailand. J Med Entomol. 1993, 30: 601-6.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. 16.

    Nguyen TV, Bui DB, Mai VS, Ta VT, Nguyen TQ, Tan N, Nguyen T: [Evaluation of malaria vector control measures in central Vietnam (1976–1991)]. Sante. 1996, 6: 97-101.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. 17.

    Tami A, Mubyazi G, Talbert A, Mshinda H, Duchon S, Lengeler C: Evaluation of Olyset insecticide-treated nets distributed seven years previously in Tanzania. Malar J. 2004, 3: 19-10.1186/1475-2875-3-19.

    PubMed Central  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. 18.

    Dabire RK, Diabate A, Baldet T, Pare-Toe L, Guiguemde RT, Ouedraogo JB, Skovmand O: Personal protection of long lasting insecticide-treated nets in areas of Anopheles gambiae s.s. resistance to pyrethroids. Malar J. 2006, 5: 12-10.1186/1475-2875-5-12.

    PubMed Central  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. 19.

    Malima RC, Magesa SM, Tungu PK, Mwingira V, Magogo FS, Sudi W, Mosha FW, Curtis CF, Maxwell C, Rowland M: An experimental hut evaluation of Olyset nets against anopheline mosquitoes after seven years use in Tanzanian villages. Malar J. 2008, 7: 38-10.1186/1475-2875-7-38.

    PubMed Central  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. 20.

    WHO: The use of impregnated bed nets and other materials for vector-borne disease control. 1989, Geneva, Switzerland: WHO/VBC/89, 981-

    Google Scholar 

  21. 21.

    Seng CM, Setha T, Nealon J, Chantha N, Socheat D, Nathan MB: The effect of long-lasting insecticidal water container covers on field populations of Aedes aegypti (L.) mosquitoes in Cambodia. J Vector Ecol. 2008, 33: 333-41. 10.3376/1081-1710-33.2.333.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. 22.

    WHO: Review of Olyset Net; Bifenthrin 10% WP. 2001, Report of the Fifth WHOPES Working Group Meeting

    Google Scholar 

  23. 23.

    Sharma SK, Tyagi PK, Upadhyay AK, Haque MA, Mohanty SS, Raghavendra K, Dash AP: Efficacy of permethrin treated long-lasting insecticidal nets on malaria transmission and observations on the perceived side effects, collateral benefits and human safety in a hyperendemic tribal area of Orissa. India. Acta Trop. 2009, 112: 181-7. 10.1016/j.actatropica.2009.07.022.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. 24.

    Ito T, Okuno T: Evaluation of the polyethylene net incorporated with permethrin during manufacture of thread on efficacy against Aedes aegypti (Linnaeus). Med Entomol Zool. 1996, 47: 171-174.

    Google Scholar 

  25. 25.

    Tsuzuki A, Vu TD, Higa Y, Nguyen TY, Takagi M: High potential risk of dengue transmission during the hot-dry season in Nha Trang City. Vietnam. Acta Trop. 2009, 111: 325-9. 10.1016/j.actatropica.2009.05.010.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. 26.

    Department of Health Long An Province: National dengue surveillance of Long An province. 2008, Tan An, Vietnam: Long An Province

    Google Scholar 

  27. 27.

    Department of Health Long An Province Department of Health Long An Province: National dengue surveillance of Long An province. 2009, Tan An, Vietnam: Long An Province

    Google Scholar 

  28. 28.

    Goverment of Vietnam: Natonal target program for rural water supply and sanitation (2006–2010). 2005, Goverment of Viet Nam

    Google Scholar 

  29. 29.

    Kawada H, Saita S, Shimabukuro K, Hirano M, Koga M, Iwashita T, Takagi M: Mosquito larvicidal effectiveness of EcoBio-Block S: a novel integrated water-purifying concrete block formulation containing insect growth regulator pyriproxyfen. J Am Mosq Control Assoc. 2006, 22: 451-6. 10.2987/8756-971X(2006)22[451:MLEOES]2.0.CO;2.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. 30.

    Knox TB, Yen NT, Nam VS, Gatton ML, Kay BH, Ryan PA: Critical evaluation of quantitative sampling methods for Aedes aegypti (Diptera: Culicidae) immatures in water storage containers in Vietnam. J Med Entomol. 2007, 44: 192-204. 10.1603/0022-2585(2007)44[192:CEOQSM]2.0.CO;2.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. 31.

    Bundo K, Igarashi A: Antibody-capture ELISA for detection of immunoglobulin M antibodies in sera from Japanese encephalitis and dengue hemorrhagic fever patients. J Virol Methods. 1985, 11: 15-22. 10.1016/0166-0934(85)90120-X.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. 32.

    Innis BL, Nisalak A, Nimmannitya S, Kusalerdchariya S, Chongswasdi V, Suntayakorn S, Puttisri P, Hoke CH: An enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay to characterize dengue infections where dengue and Japanese encephalitis co-circulate. Am J Trop Med Hyg. 1989, 40: 418-27.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. 33.

    Dobson AJ: An Introduction to Generalized Linear Models. 2001, London: Chapman & Hall/CRC Press, 2

    Google Scholar 

  34. 34.

    Yamamura K: Transformation using (x+0.5) to stabilize the variance of populations. Res Popul Ecol. 1999, 41: 229-234. 10.1007/s101440050026.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. 35.

    R Development Core Team: 2008, R: a language and environment for statistical computing 2.6.2 ed, Vienna, Austria: R Foundation for Statistical Computing

  36. 36.

    Focks DA, Alexander N: Multicountry study of Aedes aegypti pupal productivity survey methodology: Findings and recommendations. Dengue Bulletin. 2007, 31: 192-200.

    Google Scholar 

  37. 37.

    Arunachalam N, Tana S, Espino F, Kittayapong P, Abeyewickreme W, Wai KT, Tyagi BK, Kroeger A, Sommerfeld J, Petzold M: Eco-bio-social determinants of dengue vector breeding: a multicountry study in urban and periurban Asia. Bull World Health Organ. 2010, 88: 173-84. 10.2471/BLT.09.067892.

    PubMed Central  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  38. 38.

    Tun-Lin W, Lenhart A, Nam VS, Rebollar-Tellez E, Morrison AC, Barbazan P, Cote M, Midega J, Sanchez F, Manrique-Saide P, Kroeger A, Nathan MB, Meheus F, Petzold M: Reducing costs and operational constraints of dengue vector control by targeting productive breeding places: a multi-country non-inferiority cluster randomized trial. Trop Med Int Health. 2009, 14: 1143-53. 10.1111/j.1365-3156.2009.02341.x.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  39. 39.

    Tien TKT HD, Tien NT, Quang LC: Predictive indicators for forecasting epidemics of dengue/dengue haemorrhagic fever through epidemiological, virological and entomological surveillance. Dengue Bulletin. 1999, 23: 34-39.

    Google Scholar 

  40. 40.

    Strickman D, Kittayapong P: Laboratory demonstration of oviposition by Aedes aegypti (Diptera: Culicidae) in covered water jars. J Med Entomol. 1993, 30: 947-9.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  41. 41.

    Siegert PY, Walker E, Miller JR: Differential behavioral responses of Anopheles gambiae (Diptera: Culicidae) modulate mortality caused by pyrethroid-treated bednets. J Econ Entomol. 2009, 102: 2061-71. 10.1603/029.102.0607.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  42. 42.

    Vanlerberghe V, Villegas E, Oviedo M, Baly A, Lenhart A, McCall PJ, Van der Stuyft P: Evaluation of the effectiveness of insecticide treated materials for household level dengue vector control. PLoS Negl Trop Dis. 2011, 5: e994-10.1371/journal.pntd.0000994.

    PubMed Central  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  43. 43.

    Christophers SR: Aedes aegypti (L.) The yellow fever mosquito. Its life history, bionomics and structure. 1960, Chambridge: Cambridge at the University Press

    Google Scholar 

  44. 44.

    World Weather Online, World Weather Online, []

  45. 45.

    Halstead SB, Scanlon JE, Umpaivit P, Udomsakdi S: Dengue and chikungunya virus infection in man in Thailand, 1962–1964. IV. Epidemiologic studies in the Bangkok metropolitan area. Am J Trop Med Hyg. 1969, 18: 997-1021.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  46. 46.

    Morens DM, Rigau-Perez JG, Lopez-Correa RH, Moore CG, Ruiz-Tiben EE, Sather GE, Chiriboga J, Eliason DA, Casta-Velez A, Woodall JP: Dengue in Puerto Rico, 1977: public health response to characterize and control an epidemic of multiple serotypes. Am J Trop Med Hyg. 1986, 35: 197-211.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references


We thank Lanh Le Van, Preventive Medicine Center of Can Duoc district, Long An province, and Huong Lam Thi Ngoc, Local Health Center in Tan Chanh commune, Can Duoc district, Long An province, for assistance with field work. We are grateful to Ly Huynh Kim Khanh, Nguyen Thi My Tien, Le Thanh Tung, Ngo Xuan Sy, Nguyen Duc Lap, Vu Thi Cuc, and Nguyen Van Trong, as well as all the Arbovirus laboratory’s staff in Pasteur Institute in Ho Chi Minh city, for their active assistance in the entomological monitoring and the serological surveillance. We appreciate Y. Shono, Sumitomo Chemical Co., Ltd. for providing Olyset Net sample and M. Koga, Koyoh Co. Ltd, Fukuoka, Japan and T. Iwashita, Big-Bio Co., Ltd, Kumamoto, Japan for providing Bio Block S.

Author information



Corresponding author

Correspondence to Takashi Tsunoda.

Additional information

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Authors’ contributions

HK, TH, LLL, SLH, HNT, HTQV, FH, AT, and MT participated in the study design and coordination. TT, HK, TH, LLL, HTQV, HML, FH, and AT carried out the experimental work. TT, HK, and TH conducted the statistical analysis. TT, HK, and FH drafted the manuscript. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Authors’ original submitted files for images

Rights and permissions

This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Tsunoda, T., Kawada, H., Huynh, T.T.T. et al. Field trial on a novel control method for the dengue vector, Aedes aegypti by the systematic use of Olyset® Net and pyriproxyfen in Southern Vietnam. Parasites Vectors 6, 6 (2013).

Download citation


  • Water container
  • Dengue vector control
  • Lid
  • Long lasting insecticide treated net
  • Insect growth regulator