Open Access

Occurrence of tick-transmitted pathogens in dogs in Jos, Plateau State, Nigeria

  • Mathew Adamu1,
  • Milana Troskie2,
  • David O Oshadu1,
  • Dikeledi P Malatji2, 3,
  • Barend L Penzhorn2Email author and
  • Paul T Matjila2, 4
Parasites & Vectors20147:119

https://doi.org/10.1186/1756-3305-7-119

Received: 18 December 2013

Accepted: 3 March 2014

Published: 24 March 2014

Abstract

Background

Canine babesiosis caused by Babesia rossi, transmitted by Haemaphysalis elliptica in South Africa, has also been reported from Nigeria. Although H. leachi (sensu lato) is widespread in sub-Saharan Africa, published literature on the occurrence of canine babesiosis is meagre. It has been postulated that the genotype of Babesia rossi Erythrocyte Membrane Antigen 1 (BrEMA 1) may be linked to virulence of the specific isolate. The primary objective of this study was to detect and characterise tick-borne pathogens in dogs presented to a veterinary hospital using molecular techniques. In B. rossi-positive specimens, we aimed to determine whether the BrEMA 1 gene occurred and to compare genotypes with those found in other isolates. Lastly, we wished to identify the tick species that were recovered from the sampled dogs.

Methods

Blood specimens (n = 100) were collected during January to March 2010 from domestic dogs presented at an animal hospital in Jos, Plateau State, Nigeria. They were screened for the presence of Babesia/Theileria and Ehrlichia/Anaplasma genomic DNA using PCR and Reverse Line Blot (RLB) assays. Positive B. rossi specimens were tested for the presence of the BrEMA1 gene using an RT-PCR. In addition, ticks were collected from dogs found to be infested during sampling.

Results

On RLB, 72 (72%) of the specimens were positive for one or more haemoparasites. Of the positive specimens, 38 (53%) were infected with B. rossi; 9 (13%) with Theileria sp. (sable); 5 (7%) with either Ehrlichia canis or Anaplasma sp. Omatjenne, respectively; 3 (4%) with Theileria equi; and 1 (1%) with B. vogeli and E. ruminantium, respectively. Co-infections were detected in 13 (18%) of the specimens. Results of RT-PCR screening for the BrEMA1 gene were negative. A total of 146 ticks belonging to 8 species were collected and identified: Rhipicephalus sanguineus 107 (73%), Haemaphysalis leachi (sensu stricto) 27 (18%), R. turanicus 3 (2%), and Amblyomma variegatum, H. elliptica, R. lunulatus, R. muhsamae and R. senegalensis 1 (1%), respectively.

Conclusions

Up to 8 tick-borne pathogens possibly occur in the dog population at Jos, with B. rossi being the most prevalent. The absence of the BrEMA1 gene suggests that B. rossi occurring in that area may be less virulent than South African isolates.

Keywords

Babesia rossi BrEMA1 Haemaphysalis leachi Haemaphysalis elliptica Rhipicephalus sanguineus Domestic dogs Nigeria

Background

Tick-borne pathogens remain an important cause of disease among canine populations world-wide. Canine babesiosis caused by Babesia rossi is the most common and economically important tick-borne disease in South Africa[1], where the known vector is Haemaphysalis elliptica (formerly lumped with H. leachi)[2]. Presence in Africa of the less virulent Babesia vogeli, transmitted by Rhipicephalus sanguineus, was confirmed in 2004[3]. Although H. leachi (sensu lato) is a ubiquitous tick of tropical and southern Africa[2, 4], the published literature on the occurrence of canine babesiosis in Africa is surprisingly meagre. Apart from South Africa, where the disease has been studied intensively, and Nigeria, the only published references traced were from Zimbabwe[5], Zambia[6, 7], the Sudan[8] and the Cape Verde islands[9].

In Nigeria, canine babesiosis was first mentioned in an annual report of the Veterinary Department in 1926[10]. The disease occurred more frequently in imported dogs, while puppies born in the country, especially those of indigenous breeds, developed the disease in a milder form and usually recovered. This situation has persisted over many years[11]. In a survey of 400 dogs sampled randomly from many parts of Nigeria, only eight dogs (2.3%) were positive for B. rossi, while a single dog was positive for B. vogeli[12]. Blood smears made from 500 dogs presented to veterinary clinics in Ibadan, Oyo State, were examined microscopically; 53 (26.0%) were found to be infected with B. canis (sensu lato), while 41 (20.2%) were infected with B. gibsoni[13]. Babesia canis (sensu lato) was reported from Zaria, Kaduna State[14, 15]. A low prevalence (2.8%) of B. canis (sensu lato) infection was found in a blood-smear-based survey among slaughtered dogs in Maiduguri, Borno State[16]. Using molecular detection and characterisation on blood specimens of 181 dogs presented to veterinary hospitals in four states, B. rossi was detected in 2/17 dogs (11.8%) in Rivers State, while in Plateau State it was found in 6/41 (14.6%) dogs in Jos North and in 4/64 (4.8%) dogs in Jos South[17]. A single dog in Kaduna state was found to be positive for B. vogeli[17]. Interestingly, B. canis (sensu stricto) and B. rossi co-infection was found in a dog that had never left Vom, Plateau State[18]. This stimulated renewed interest in the epidemiology of canine babesiosis in Africa, as it was the first confirmation of the occurrence of B. canis in a geographical region were Dermacentor reticulatus, the only confirmed vector of B. canis, does not occur[18].

Clinical signs of canine babesiosis always include fever and splenomegaly, while inappetence, weakness, lethargy, generalised lymphadenopathy, anaemia and haemoglobinuria due to erythrolysis may also occur[19]. In some cases infection remains sub-clinical[20]. The clinical manifestation of B. rossi infection is classified as either uncomplicated or complicated[21, 22]. It is regarded as uncomplicated if the clinical signs can be attributed solely to mild or moderate anaemia[21]. On the other hand, complicated cases are those where there is evidence of non-solid-organ failure characterised by severe anaemia and haemoconcentration or organ dysfunction/failure[22]. The mechanisms resulting in B. rossi being associated with such diverse clinical manifestations remain unknown. One possibility is that it may be due to genotypic differences among B. rossi strains, as has been suggested for B. canis (sensu stricto)[23]. A polymorphic phosphoprotein localised on the cytoplasmic surface of B. rossi-infected erythrocytes has been named Babesia rossi erythrocyte membrane antigen 1 (BrEMA1)[19]. BrEMA1 genes of various laboratory strains code for polymorphic proteins that contain various numbers of repetitive hexapeptide motifs[19]. The exact function of this gene is unknown, but it is hypothesised that it may be related to virulence[19].

The primary objective of this study was to detect and characterise tick-borne pathogens in dogs presented to a veterinary hospital in Jos, Plateau State, Nigeria, using molecular techniques (Polymerase Chain Reaction and Reverse Line Blot). In B. rossi-positive specimens,we aimed to determine whether the BrEMA 1 gene occurred and to compare genotypes with those found in other isolates. Lastly, we wished to identify the tick species that were present on the sampled dogs.

Methods

Collection of samples

The study was carried out on dogs presented for treatment at the Evangelical Church Winning All (ECWA) Animal Hospital at Jos, Plateau State, Nigeria (9°56’N, 8°53’E; altitude 1217 m), virtually in the geographical centre of Nigeria. A total of 100 dogs were examined over a 3-month period (Jan-Mar 2010): 55 females and 43 males; in 2 cases the gender/age were not recorded. Of the 55 female dogs, 41 were < 18 months old and 14 were regarded as adult. Of the 43 male dogs, 25 were < 18 months old and 18 were regarded as adults. Dogs were clinically examined upon presentation. If detected, ticks were collected, stored in 70% alcohol and sent to the Department of Veterinary Tropical Diseases, Faculty of Veterinary Science, University of Pretoria, South Africa, for identification by stereomicroscopy[24]. Blood specimens were collected into EDTA tubes from the cephalic vein. From the EDTA tubes 80 μl of blood were micro-pipetted onto the Whatman FTA classic card (GE Healthcare UK Limited). These cards were dried and sent to the Department of Veterinary Tropical Diseases of the Faculty of Veterinary Science University of Pretoria, South Africa.

DNA extraction

DNA was extracted from the filter paper specimen. The QI Amp blood and tissue kit (Qiagen, Hilden, Germany) was used for DNA extractions following the manufacturer’s protocols.

PCR

The Babesia/Theileria PCR was performed with primers RLB-F2 (5’-GAC ACAGGG AGG TAG TGA CAA G-3’) and RLB-R2 (biotin-5’-CTA AGA ATT TCA CCT CTG ACA GT-3’) amplifying a fragment of 460–540 bp from the 18S rRNA gene spanning the V4 region[3, 25]. The Ehrlichia/Anaplasma PCR was performed with primers Ehr-R (5’-biotin-CGG GAT CCC GAG TTT GCC GGG ACT TYT TCT-3’) and Ehr-F (50-GGA ATT CAG AGT TGG ATC MTG GYT CAG-30) amplifying a fragment of 460–520 bp from the V1 hypervariable region of the 16S SSU rRNA gene[26, 27]. The conditions for the PCR included an initial step of 3 min at 42°C, 10 min at 94°C, 10 cycles of 94°C (20 s)–67°C (30 s)–72°C (30 s), with lowering of the annealing step after every second cycle by 2°C (touchdown PCR). The reaction was then followed by 40 cycles of denaturation at 94°C for 30 s, annealing at 57°C for 30 s and extension at 72°C for 30 s.

Reverse line blot hybridisation

RLB was subsequently conducted on amplified products (Babesia, Theileria, Anaplasma and Ehrlichia) as previously described[3]. The probes and their sequences used for detecting pathogen DNA are listed in Table 1. Each probe on the membrane has a related cloned positive control that is included with every RLB test.
Table 1

List of organisms and their corresponding probe sequences used to detect pathogen DNA

Anaplasma bovis

GTA GCT TGC TAT GRG AAC A

Anaplasma centrale

TCG AAC GGA CCA TAC GC

Anaplasma marginale

GAC CGT ATA CGC AGC TTG

Anaplasma ovis

ACC GTA CGC GCA GCT TG

Anaplasma phagocytophilum 1

TTG CTA TAA AGA ATA ATT AGT GG

Anaplasma sp. (Omatjenne)

CGG ATT TTT ATC ATA GCT TGC

Babesia bicornis

TTG GTA AAT CGC CTT GGT C

Babesia bigemina

CGT TTT TTC CCT TTT GTT GG

Babesia bovis

CAG GTT TCG CCT GTA TAA TTG AG

Babesia caballi

GTG TTT ATC GCA GAC TTT TGT

Babesia canis

TGC GTT GAC CGT TTG AC

Babesia catch-all 1

ATT AGA GTG TTT CAA GCA GAC

Babesia catch-all 2

ACT AGA GTG TTT CAA ACA GGC

Babesia divergens

ACT RAT GTC GAG ATT GCA C

Babesia felis

TTA TGC GTT TTC CGA CTG GC

Babesia gibsoni

CAT CCC TCT GGT TAA TTT G

Babesia leo

ATC TTG TTG CCT TGC AGC T

Babesia microti

GRC TTG GCA TCW TCT GGA

Babesia occultans

CCT CTT TTG GCC CAT CTC GTC

Babesia ovis

TGC GCG CGG CCT TTG CGT T

Babesia rossi

CGG TTT GTT GCC TTT GTG

Babesia sp. (sable)

GCT GCA TTG CCT TTT CTC C

Babesia vogeli

AGC GTG TTC GAG TTT GCC

Ehrlichia/Anaplasma catch-all

GGG GGA AAG ATT TAT CGC TA

Ehrlichia canis/Ehrlichia ovina

TCT GGC TAT AGG AAA TTG TTA

Ehrlichia chaffeensis

ACC TTT TGG TTA TAA ATA ATT GTT

Ehrlichia ruminantium

AGT ATC TGT TAG TGG CAG

Theileria annae

CCG AAC GTA ATT TTA TTG ATT TG

Theileria annulata

CCT CTG GGG TCT GTG CA

Theileria/Babesia catch-all

TAA TGG TTA ATA GGA RCR GTT G

Theileria bicornis

GCG TTG TGG CTT TTT TCT G

Theileria buffeli

GGC TTA TTT CGG WTT GAT TTT

Theileria catch-all

ATT AGA GTG CTC AAA GCA GGC

Theileria equi

TTC GTT GAC TGC GYT TGG

Theileria lestoquardi

CTT GTG TCC CTC CGG G

Theileria mutans

CTT GCG TCT CCG AAT GTT

Theileria ovis

TTG CTT TTG CTC CTT TAC GAG

Theileria parva

GGA CGG AGT TCG CTT TG

Theileria separata

GGT CGT GGT TTT CCT CGT

Theileria sp. (buffalo)

CAG ACG GAG TTT ACT TTG T

Theileria sp. (duiker)

CAT TTT GGT TAT TGC ATT GTG G

Theileria sp. (kudu)

CTG CAT TGT TTC TTT CCT TTG

Theileria sp. (sable)

GCT GCA TTG CCT TTT CTC C

Theileria taurotragi

TCT TGG CAC GTG GCT TTT

Theileria velifera

CCT ATT CTC CTT TAC GAG T

Real-time PCR

Primers FrepBrEMA 1 (5’-CCA ACA TTG ATG ATG ACA A-3’) and RrepBrEMA 1 (5’-CTG CAT GTC AGC TTC ATC A-3’) for real-time PCR were used to specifically amplify the BrEMA 1 gene on samples that tested positive for B. rossi on RLB. The eBox Light Cycler DNA Master SYBR Green 1 Kit was used (Roche Diagnostics). The real-time PCR reaction mixture consisted of 13.4 μl of water PCR-grade, 1.6 μl MgCl2 (5 pmol), 1 μl (5 pmol) of each primer, 2 μl Light Cycler® DNA Master SYBR Green I and 1 μl of DNA to a total volume of 19 μl. The real-time PCR was performed in 32 capillaries. Light Cycler 2.0 (Roche Diagnostics) was used to amplify genomic DNA.

Sequencing

Two samples (RLB 42 and 67) that tested positive on RLB for B. rossi were randomly selected for 18S rRNA gene sequencing. The full-length 18S rRNA gene of both samples was amplified using 20 pmol of primers Nbab-1 F (5’-AAGCCATGCATGTCTAAGTATAAGCTTTT-3’) and reverse primer TB 18S-Rev (5’-GAATAATTCACCGGATCACTCG-3’)[28, 29] to give a PCR amplicon of ca. 1700 base pairs. PCR amplification was done with 2.5 μl of extracted DNA in a final volume of 25 μl of PCR reaction containing 10 μl PCR grade water, 10 μM of each primer, and 12.5 μl of High Fidelity PCR Master. The cycling conditions consisted of an initial cycle of 5 min at 94°C, 30 cycles of amplification (94°C for 30 sec, 55°C for 30 sec and 72°C for 1 min) and 1 cycle of 7 min at 72°C. The PCR products were purified using the QIAquick PCR Purification Kit (Qiagen, Germany) and sent to a commercial laboratory (Inqaba Biotech) for sequencing.

Phylogenetic analysis

Sequence data for the full-length 18S rRNA gene were assembled and edited to a total length of 1532 bp using GAP4 of the Staden package (Version 1.6.0 for Windows) and deposited in Genbank[30]. The sequences were aligned with sequences of related genera using ClustalX (Version 1.81 for Windows). The alignments were adjusted manually using the BioEdit program (version 7.0.5.2)[31]. Two generated sequences and 18 Genbank sequences with 1532 characters where analysed. A phylogenetic tree was generated using the ‘GeneBee’ (http://www.genebee.msu.su/genebee.html) programme. Phylogenetic analyses using cluster distance algorithm method were carried out (Phylip, Multiline) into the program format from the aligned nucleotide sequences. In the cluster algorithm, the notion of distance between groups of sequences was used for setting the branching order (http://www.genebee.msu.su/genebee.html).

Nucleotide sequence accession numbers

The 18S rRNA gene sequences obtained from this study were submitted to GenBank under the following accession numbers: B. rossi RLB42: JQ 613104 and B. rossi RLB67: JQ 613105, respectively.

Results

The RLB results showed that 72 (72%) of the specimens were positive for one or more haemoparasites (Table 2). In the 72 infected dogs, single infections occurred in 49 (68.1%) and co-infections occurred in 23 (31.9%). Seven tick-transmitted pathogens were detected, while further undescribed species or species variants were also captured: in 6/72 (8%) specimens by the Theileria/Babesia catch-all probe and in 4/72 (6%) specimens by the Ehrlichia/Anaplasma catch-all probe. Babesia rossi, present in 53% of the dogs, was by far the more prevalent pathogen. Non-specific clinical signs such as inappetance, pyrexia, pale mucous membranes, rough hair coat, emaciation and weakness were observed, with 90% of the dogs showing 2 or 3 of these clinical signs. None of the dogs exhibited clinical signs associated with severe or complicated canine babesiosis.
Table 2

Number of dogs infected with single or multiple tick-borne pathogens

Nature of infection

 
 

B. rossi

B. vogeli

E. canis

E. ruminantium

A. sp. (Omatjenne)

T. equi

T. sp. (sable)

B/T

E/A

Total

Single infection

31

0

1

0

4

1

8

3

1

49

Co-infection with:

          

B. rossi

-

1

3

0

0

2

1

-

1

8

B. vogeli

1

-

0

0

0

0

0

-

0

1

E. canis

3

0

-

1

0

0

0

0

-

4

E. ruminantium

0

0

1

-

0

0

0

0

-

1

A. sp. (Omatjenne)

0

0

0

0

-

0

0

1

-

1

T. equi

2

0

0

0

0

-

0

-

0

2

T. sp. (sable)

1

0

0

0

0

0

-

-

2

3

B/T

-

-

0

0

1

-

-

-

0

1

E/A

0

0

-

-

-

0

0

2

-

2

Total

38

1

5

1

5

3

9

6

4

72

B. rossi = Babesia rossi; B. vogeli = Babesia vogeli; E. canis = Ehrlichia canis; E. ruminantium = Ehrlichia ruminantium; A. sp. (Omatjenne) = Anaplasma species (Omatjenne); T. equi = Theileria equi; T. sp. (sable) = Theileria species (sable); B/T = Babesia/Theileria catch-all; E/A = Ehrlichia/Anaplasma catch-all.

BrEMA1 Real Time- PCR

Real-time PCR did not detect the BrEMA 1 gene in samples that were Babesia rossi- positive on RLB.

Sequencing and phylogenetic analysis

Near-full-length 18S rRNA gene sequences were obtained from samples RLB42 and RLB67. A BLAST search revealed both samples showed a 99% similarity with B. rossi, a South African isolate (Accession number: L19079.1) and with B. rossi from Sudan (Accession number: DQ111760.1). The observed sequences were phylogenetically analysed to confirm their similarities. A neighbor-joining phylogenetic analysis was used to reveal the relationships between the generated 18S rRNA gene and other related Babesia and Theileria species. The analyses showed that the RLB42 and RLB67 sequences were closely related to B. rossi from South Africa and Sudan (Figure 1).
Figure 1

Neighbor-joining tree, with the Kimura two-parameter distance [47]calculation showing the phylogenetic relationship of RLB 42 and 67 to related species based on the 18S rRNA gene sequences. Relationships are presented as an unrooted tree with branch lengths being proportional to the estimated genetic distance between the strains.

The pooled ticks collected from the dogs in this study are listed in Table 3. Larvae of Cordylobia anthropophaga were also encountered.
Table 3

List of ticks collected

Species

Nymph

Adult

Total

 

Male

Female

(%)

Amblyomma variegatum

-

1

-

1 (1%)

Haemaphysalis elliptica

-

1

-

1 (1%)

Haemaphysalis leachi

-

4

23

27 (18%)

Rhipicephalus lunulatus

-

-

1

1 (1%)

Rhipicephalus muhsamae

-

1

2

3 (2%)

Rhipicephalus sanguineus

41

25

41

107 (73%)

Rhipicephalus senegalensis

-

1

2

3 (2%)

Rhipicephalus turanicus

-

3

-

3 (2%)

Discussion

The main objective of this study was to use molecular techniques such as PCR/RLB to screen for the presence of tick-borne pathogens in a dog population in Nigeria. In addition, we aimed to determine whether the BrEMA 1 gene, which has been postulated to be associated with virulence in B. rossi- infected dogs, was present[19]. The results of this study indicate the presence of a wide range of tick-borne pathogens circulating among the sampled dog population of Jos, Nigeria. The RLB results showed that 72% of the dogs screened harboured one or two tick-borne haemoparasites. The most common parasite recorded in this study was B. rossi (53%). The presence of B. rossi in dogs in Nigeria had been reported previously, but the prevalences found were much lower than the 53% that we report: 8/400 (2%) in a general survey[12] and 12/181 (6.6%) in dogs presented to veterinary hospitals[17]. At the Onderstepoort Veterinary Academic Hospital in South Africa, around 12% of all sick dogs presented at the outpatients clinic are diagnosed with babesiosis[32]. We found a single dog positive for B. vogeli, which confirms the very low prevalences reported in other studies: 1/400 (0.25%)[12] and 1/181 (0.6%)[17]. This is interesting since the known vector, R. sanguineus, was the most numerous tick encountered in our study. While H. leachi (sensu stricto) was the second most abundant tick encountered, we found a single H. elliptica, the proven vector of B. rossi in South Africa. This suggests that H. leachi may also be a competent vector of B. rossi in Nigeria.

To our knowledge, these are the first reports of the possible occurrence in dogs of Theileria equi, Theileria sp. (sable), Ehrlichia ruminantium and Anaplasma sp. (Omatjenne) in Nigeria. The only Theileria sp. currently known to cause severe disease in domestic dog is T. annae, which was originally reported to occur in Spain[33, 34]. Theileria annae has also been reported in North America, Portugal and Sweden[3539]. Theileria equi and T. annulata have also been isolated from dogs in Spain[34, 40]. The clinical significance of T. equi and/or T. annulata parasites in dogs remains unknown. Theileria sp. (sable), possibly found in 9 dogs in our study, is known to cause mortalities in sable antelopes, but is also reported from other species where it appears to be an incidental finding[41]. A parasite similar to Theileria sp. (sable), designated Theileria sp. (dog), has been reported as an incidental finding in South African dogs[42], while a single dog from Jos South, Nigeria, was reported to be positive for Theileria sp.[17]. Parasites known to be virulent in particular hosts may infect accidental hosts without causing disease[40]. This may also apply to E. ruminantium and A. sp. (Omatjenne) possibly detected in our specimens. Since B. rossi was the focus of our study, the presence of the DNA of the other haemoparasites found was not confirmed by DNA sequencing. This should be followed up to rule out possible contamination or misidentification.

The BrEMA 1 gene appears to be unique to B. rossi as it is absent in B. vogeli and B. canis isolates investigated[19]. At least 12 different BrEMA1 genotypes have been reported in South Africa, of which 4 are associated with poor prognosis in B. rossi-infected dogs[19]. The negative results of the real-time PCR indicated that the BrEMA1 gene was absent in all 38 specimens tested. This was surprising, but could possibly account for the absence of severe, complicated canine babesiosis cases in our sample. The question arises whether the BrEMA1 gene is absent from B. rossi in other parts of Nigeria, as well as from other countries in sub-Saharan Africa.

In Nigeria, Babesia infections in dogs are usually mild and in some cases sub-clinical. This is contrary to the South African situation where B. rossi infections are often associated with clinical complications and mortalities. The reason for the virulence of the B. rossi isolates from South Africa may be due to the presence of wild canids, e.g., African wild dogs (Lycaon pictus) and black-backed jackals (Canis mesomelas), in the maintenance of the life cycle of B. rossi[43]. In Nigeria, wild canid populations have been persecuted to the point where there are no naturally occurring wild canids[44]. Given this fact, we can speculate that the life cycle of B. rossi is currently maintained only within the domestic dog population in Nigeria. This is contrary to the South African situation, where B. rossi has been detected and isolated from wild dogs. In addition H. elliptica, the known vector of B. rossi, has been collected from wild and domestic dogs in South Africa[45, 46]. This may imply that B. rossi in Nigeria has through time and by natural selection lost its virulence, and by implication, the BrEMA1 gene and its associated virulent genotypes. Thus, further studies will be required to investigate the role of wild canids in the maintenance of virulent B. rossi genotypes circulating within domestic dog populations.

Comparison of the B.rossi 18S rRNA gene sequences obtained indicates that the B. rossi sequences from Nigeria are closely related to the B. rossi from South Africa (Accession number: L 19079) and Sudan (Accession number: DQ 111760) with a 99% identity. Since the sequences are similar, this supports our conclusion that the B. rossi isolates circulating in domestic dogs in Nigeria are indeed true B. rossi (sensu stricto).

Conclusions

At least 8 tick-borne pathogens possibly occurred in the sampled dog population at Jos, with B. rossi being the most prevalent. No severe or complicated cases of canine babesiosis were reported, suggesting either that the dogs cope fairly well with infection or that the B. rossi in that area is less virulent than elsewhere, e.g. in South Africa. The absence of the BrEMA1 gene, which has been postulated as being linked with clinical outcome of infection, may possibly account for B. rossi occurring in that area being less virulent than South African isolates. The high prevalence of B. rossi infection indicates the presence of a competent vector of this pathogen; circumstantial evidence points to H. leachi (sensu stricto) being the vector.

Ethical consideration

This research was approved by the Research Committee of the College of Veterinary Medicine, University of Agriculture, Makurdi, Nigeria.

Declarations

Acknowledgements

We acknowledge all the clinicians at the ECWA Animal Hospital Jos, Plateau State, Nigeria, for their support and cooperation in collecting the samples and the clinical data made available to us. The first author thanks his employers, the University of Agriculture Makurdi and Tertiary Education Tax Fund (TET Fund) Nigeria for sponsorship to the University of Pretoria. The National Research Foundation (NRF) South Africa is acknowledged for the financial support granted to PT Matjila under the Naledi Pandor Y-rated fund. Prof I.G. Horak is sincerely acknowledged for identifying the collected ticks. Publication of the CVBD9 thematic series has been sponsored by Bayer HealthCare - Animal Health division.

Authors’ Affiliations

(1)
Department of Veterinary Parasitology and Entomology, College of Veterinary Medicine, University of Agriculture Makurdi
(2)
Department of Veterinary Tropical Diseases, Faculty of Veterinary Science, University of Pretoria
(3)
Department of Wildlife and Animal Science, Faculty of Natural and Agricultural Science, University of Pretoria
(4)
Department of Life and Consumer Sciences, College of Agriculture and Environmental Sciences

References

  1. Collett MG: Survey of canine babesiosis in South Africa. J S Afr Vet Assoc. 2000, 71: 180-186.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. Apanaskevich DA, Horak IG, Camicas JL: Redescription of Haemaphysalis (Rhipistoma) elliptica (Koch, 1844), an old taxon of the Haemaphysalis (Rhipistoma) leachi group from East and southern Africa, and of Haemaphysalis (Rhipistoma) leachi (Audouin, 1826) (Ixodida, Ixodidae). Onderstepoort J Vet Res. 2007, 74: 181-208.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. Matjila PT, Penzhorn BL, Bekker CP, Nijhof AM, Jongejan F: Confirmation of occurrence of Babesia canis vogeli in domestic dogs in South Africa. Vet Parasitol. 2004, 122: 119-125. 10.1016/j.vetpar.2004.03.019.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. Hoogstraal H: African Ixodoidea. I. Ticks of the Sudan (with special reference to Equatoria Province and with preliminary reviews of the genera Boophilus, Margaropus and Hyalomma). 1956, Cairo: US Naval Medical Research Unit 3, Research report NM 005 050.29.07Google Scholar
  5. Matthewman LA, Kelly PJ, Bobade M, Tagwira PR, Mason A, Majok A, Brouqui P, Raoult D: Infections with Babesia canis and Ehrlichia canis in dogs in Zimbabwe. Vet Rec. 1993, 133: 344-364. 10.1136/vr.133.14.344.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. Nalubamba KS, Hankanga C, Mudenda NB, Msuku M: The epidemiology of canine Babesia infections in Zambia. Prev Vet Med. 2011, 99: 240-244. 10.1016/j.prevetmed.2010.12.006.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. Williams BM, Berentsen A, Shock BC, Teixeira M, Dunbar MR, Becker MS, Yablsey MJ: Prevalence and diversity of Babesia, Hepatozoon, Ehrlichia and Bartonella in wild and domestic carnivores from Zambia, Africa. Parasitol Res. 2013, doi:10.1007/s00436-013-3722-7Google Scholar
  8. Oyamada M, Davoust B, Boni M, Dereure J, Bucheton B, Hammad A, Itamoto K, Okuda M, Inokuma H: Detection of Babesia canis rossi, B. canis vogeli, and Hepatozoon canis in dogs in a village of eastern Sudan by using a screening PCR and sequencing methodologies. Clin Diagn Lab Immunol. 2005, 12: 1343-1346.PubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. Götsch S, Leschnik M, Duscher G, Burgstaller JP, Wille-Piazzai W, Joachim A: Ticks and haemoparasites of dogs from Praia, Cape Verde. Vet Parasitol. 2009, 166: 171-174. 10.1016/j.vetpar.2009.08.009.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. Leeflang P: Tick-borne diseases of domestic animals in northern Nigeria. I. Historical review, 1923–1966. Trop Anim Hlth Prod. 1977, 9: 147-152. 10.1007/BF02236588.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  11. Leeflang P, Ilemobade AA: Tick-borne diseases of domestic animals in northern Nigeria. II. Research summary, 1966 to 1976. Trop Anim Hlth Prod. 1977, 9: 211-218. 10.1007/BF02240342.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  12. Sasaki M, Omobowale O, Tozuka M, Ohta K, Matsuu A, Nottidge HO, Hirata H, Ikadai H, Oyamada T: Molecular survey of Babesia canis in dogs in Nigeria. J Vet Med Sci. 2007, 69: 1191-1193. 10.1292/jvms.69.1191.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. Oduye OO, Dipeolu OO: Blood parasites of dogs in Ibadan. J Small Anim Prac. 1976, 17: 331-337. 10.1111/j.1748-5827.1976.tb06966.x.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  14. Abdullahi SU, Mohammed AA, Trimnell AR, Sannusi A, Alafiatayo R: Clinical and haematological findings in 70 naturally occurring cases of canine babesiosis. J Small Anim Pract. 1990, 31: 145-147. 10.1111/j.1748-5827.1990.tb00750.x.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  15. Useh NM, Gladele SB, Adamu S, Ibrahim NDG, Mok AJ, Esievo KAN: Aetiology and prevalence of canine anaemia in Zaria: A review of 2139 cases observed at the Veterinary Teaching hospital of the Ahmadu Bello University, Zaria, Nigeria 1990–2003. Vet Q. 2003, 25 (4): 150-154. 10.1080/01652176.2003.9695157.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. Adamu NB, Adamu JY, Salisu L: Prevalence of ecto-, endo- and haemoparasites in slaughtered dogs in Maiduguri, Nigeria. Rev Méd Vét. 2012, 163: 178-182.Google Scholar
  17. Kamani J, Baneth G, Mumcuoglu KY, Waziri NE, Oyahi O, Githmann Y, Harrus S: Molecular detection and characterization of tick-borne pathogens in dogs and ticks from Nigeria. PLoS Negl Trop Dis. 2013, 7 (3): e2108-10.1371/journal.pntd.0002108. doi:10.1371/journal/pntf.0002108PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. Kamani J, Sannusi A, Dogo AG, Tanko JT, Egwu KO, Tafarki AE, Ogo IN, Kemza S, Onovoh E, Shamaki D, Lombin LH, Catto V, Birkenheuer AJ: Babesia canis and Babesia rossi co-infection in an untraveled Nigerian dog. Vet Parasitol. 2010, 173: 334-335. 10.1016/j.vetpar.2010.06.040.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. Matjila PT, Carcy B, Leisewitz AL, Schetters T, Jongejan F, Gorenflot A, Penzhorn BL: Preliminary evaluation of the BrEMA1 gene as a tool for associating Babesia rossi genotypes and clinical manifestation of canine babesiosis. J Clin Microbiol. 2009, 47 (11): 3586-10.1128/JCM.01110-08. doi:10.1128/JCM.01110-08PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. Matijatko V, Torti M, Schetters TP: Canine babesiosis in Europe: how many diseases?. Trends Parasitol. 2012, 28: 99-105. 10.1016/j.pt.2011.11.003.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. Jacobson LS, Clarke IA: The pathophysiology of canine babesiosis: new approaches to an old puzzle. J S Afr Vet Assoc. 1994, 65: 134-145.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. Jacobson LS: The South African form of severe and complicated canine babesiosis: clinical advances 1994–2004. Vet Parasitol. 2006, 138: 126-139. 10.1016/j.vetpar.2006.01.047.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. Bourdoisseau G: Canine babesiosis in France. Vet Parasitol. 2006, 138: 118-125. 10.1016/j.vetpar.2006.01.046.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  24. Walker AR, Bouattour A, Camicas JL, Estrada-Peña A, Horak IG, Latif AA, Pegram RG, Preston PM: Ticks of domestic animals in Africa: a guide to identification of species. 2003, Atlanta: Houten, The NetherlandsGoogle Scholar
  25. Gubbels JM, de Vos AP, Van der Weide M, Viseras J, Schouls LM, de Vries E, Jongejan F: Simultaneous detection of bovine Theileria and Babesia species by reverse line blot hybridization. J Clin Microbiol. 1999, 37: 1782-1789.PubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  26. Bekker CPJ, de Vos S, Taoufik A, Sparagano OAE, Jongejan F: Simultaneous detection of Anaplasma and Ehrlichia species in ruminants and detection of Ehrlichia ruminantium and Amblyomma variegatum ticks by reverse line blot hybridization. Vet Microbiol. 2002, 89: 223-238. 10.1016/S0378-1135(02)00179-7.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  27. Ebert D: Experimental evolution of parasites. Science (Washington). 1998, 282: 432-1435.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  28. Oosthuizen MC, Zweygarth E, Collins NE, Troskie M, Penzhorn BL: Identification of a novel Babesia sp. from sable antelope (Hippotragus niger, Harris 1838). J Clin Microbiol. 2008, 46: 2247-2251. 10.1128/JCM.00167-08.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  29. Bhoora R, Franssen R, Oosthuizen MC, Guthrie AJ, Zweygarth E, Penzhorn BL, Jongejan F, Collins NE: Sequence heterogeneity in the 18S rRNA gene within Theileria equi and Babesia caballi from horses in South Africa. Vet Parasitol. 2009, 159: 112-120. 10.1016/j.vetpar.2008.10.004.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  30. Staden R, Beal KF, Bonfield JK: The Staden package, 1998. Methods Mol Biol. 2000, 132: 115-130.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  31. Hall TA: BioEdit: a user-friendly biological sequence alignment editor and analysis program for Windows 95/98/NT. Nucl Acids Symp Ser. 1999, 41: 95-98.Google Scholar
  32. Shakespeare AS: The incidence of canine babesiosis amongst sick dogs presented to the Onderstepoort Veterinary Academic Hospital. J S Afr Vet Assoc. 1995, 54: 47-51.Google Scholar
  33. Camacho AT, Pallas E, Gestal JJ, Guitian FJ, Olmeda AS, Goethert HK, Telford SR: Infection of dogs in North-West Spain with Babesia microti- like agent. Vet Rec. 2001, 49: 552-555.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  34. Criado-Fornelio A, Martinez-Marcos A, Buling-Sarana A, Barba-Carretero JC: Molecular studies on Babesia, Theileria and Hepatozoon in southern Europe - Part II. Phylogenetic analysis and evolutionary history. Vet Parasitol. 2003, 114: 173-194. 10.1016/S0304-4017(03)00141-9.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  35. Solano-Gallego L, Baneth G: Babesiosis in dogs and cats - expanding parasitological and clinical spectra. Vet Parasitol. 2011, 181: 48-60. 10.1016/j.vetpar.2011.04.023.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  36. Dixit P, Dixit AK, Varshney JP: Evidence of new pathogenic Theileria species in dogs. J Parasit Dis. 2010, 34: 29-32. 10.1007/s12639-010-0009-0.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  37. Yisachor-Mekuzas Y, Jaffe CL, Pastor J, Cardoso L, Baneth G: Identification of Babesia species infecting dogs using reverse line blot hybridization for six canine piroplasms and evaluation of co-infection by other vector-borne-pathogens. Vet Parasitol. 2013, 191: 367-373. 10.1016/j.vetpar.2012.09.002.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  38. Yeagley TJ, Reichard MV, Hempstead JE, Allen KE, Parsons LM, White MA, Little SE, Meinkoth JH: Detection of Babesia gibsoni and the canine small Babesia "Spanish isolate" in blood samples obtained from dogs confiscated from dog fighting operations. J Am Vet Med Assoc. 2009, 235: 535-539. 10.2460/javma.235.5.535.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  39. Falkenö U, Tasker S, Osterman-Lind E, Tvedfen HW: Theileria annae in a young Swedish dog. Act Vet Scan. 2013, 55: 50-54. 10.1186/1751-0147-55-50.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  40. Criado-Fornelio A, Gonzalez-del-Rio MA, Buling-Sarana A, Barba-Carretero JC: The "expanding universe" of piroplasms. Vet Parasit. 2004, 119: 337-345. 10.1016/j.vetpar.2003.11.015.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  41. Nijhof AM, Pillay V, Steyl J, Prozesky L, Stoltsz WH, Lawrence JA, Penzhorn BL, Jongejan F: Molecular characterization of Theileria species associated with mortality in four species of African antelopes. J Clin Microbiol. 2005, 43: 5907-5911. 10.1128/JCM.43.12.5907-5911.2005.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  42. Matjila PT, Leisewitz AL, Oosthuizen MC, Jongejan F, Penzhorn BL: Detection of a Theileria species in dogs in South Africa. Vet Parasitol. 2008, 157: 34-40. 10.1016/j.vetpar.2008.06.025.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  43. Penzhorn BL: Why is Southern African canine babesiosis so virulent? An evolutionary perspective. Parasit Vectors. 2011, 4: 51-10.1186/1756-3305-4-51. doi:10-1186/1756-3305-4-51PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  44. Fanshawe JH, Frame LH, Ginsberg JR: The wild dog: Africa’s vanishing carnivore. Oryx. 1991, 23: 137-146.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  45. Matjila PT, Leisewitz AL, Jongejan F, Bertschinger HJ, Penzhorn BL: Molecular detection of Babesia rossi and Hepatozoon sp. in African wild dogs (Lycaon pictus). Vet Parasitol. 2008, 157: 123-127. 10.1016/j.vetpar.2008.07.016.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  46. Matjila PT, Leisewitz AL, Jongejan F, Penzhorn BL: Molecular detection of tick-borne protozoal and ehrlichial infections in domestic dogs in South Africa. Vet Parasitol. 2008, 155: 152-157. 10.1016/j.vetpar.2008.04.012.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  47. Kimura M: A simple method for estimating evolutionary rates of base substitutions through comparative studies of nucleotide sequences. J Mol Evol. 1980, 16: 111-120. 10.1007/BF01731581.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright

© Adamu et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2014

This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly credited. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.

Comments

By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.