Open Access

Schistosoma mansoni infection after three years of mass drug administration in Sierra Leone

  • Santigie Sesay1,
  • Jusufu Paye2,
  • Mohamed S Bah2,
  • Florence Max McCarthy1,
  • Abdulai Conteh1,
  • Mustapha Sonnie2,
  • Mary H Hodges2Email author and
  • Yaobi Zhang3
Contributed equally
Parasites & Vectors20147:14

https://doi.org/10.1186/1756-3305-7-14

Received: 31 October 2013

Accepted: 6 January 2014

Published: 9 January 2014

Abstract

Background

Schistosoma mansoni was moderately-highly endemic in the northeast of Sierra Leone. The national neglected tropical disease control program started mass drug administration (MDA) with praziquantel (PZQ) in six districts in 2009 targeting primary school children only. The effort was scaled-up to seven districts in 2010 targeting school aged children (SAC) and at-risk adults. A cross-sectional sentinel site survey was conducted in 2012 after three rounds of MDA to evaluate the impact of the national program.

Methods

Twenty-six (26) sentinel sites were randomly selected from the baseline mapping survey sites stratified according to the baseline prevalence into high, moderate or low endemic category. Fifty (50) school children (25 males and 25 females) were randomly selected per site. Fresh stool samples were examined in the field using the Kato Katz technique. The results were compared with the baseline data.

Results

Program coverage of 94.8%, 77.1% and 81.7% was reported in 2009, 2010 and 2011 respectively. Independent monitoring in 2011 showed program coverage of 83.9%, not significantly different from the reported result in the same year. The overall prevalence of S. mansoni was 16.3% (95% CI: 14.4-18.4%) and mean intensity was 18.98 epg (95% CI: 11.46-26.50 epg) in 2012, representing 67.2% and 85.9% reduction from the baseline respectively. The proportion of moderately and heavily infected children was 3.3% and 1.2%, a significant reduction from 18.2% and 8.8% at baseline respectively.

Conclusions

Sierra Leone has maintained effective MDA coverage with PZQ since 2009. Three rounds of MDA led to a significant reduction of S. mansoni infection in the country. In line with the significant progress made in controlling schistosomiasis, the national treatment strategy has been reviewed and MDA will be expanded to include school age children in low endemicity districts with the new national objective for the elimination of schistosomiasis. Sierra Leone is well on its way to eliminate schistosomiasis as a public health problem.

Keywords

Schistosomiasis Schistosoma mansoni Neglected tropical diseasesNTDsIndependent monitoringSierra LeoneMass drug administrationPraziquantel

Background

Schistosomiasis inflicts great health and socioeconomic burdens on the poorest populations in both rural and non-rural settings of the tropics and subtropics, particularly in sub-Saharan Africa [1, 2]. It is estimated that over 200 million people are infected with schistosomes worldwide, and schistosomiasis alone results in 200,000 deaths per year in sub-Saharan Africa [1, 3]. Infected children that have marginal levels of adequate nutrition are at risk of growth retardation, impaired cognition, and micronutrient deficiencies [47]. These factors combine to reduce school attendance and to impair educational performance, which, in turn, lead to a reduction in future productivity and wage-earning capacity [8, 9].

The global effort in the integrated control of the neglected tropical diseases (NTDs) currently targets five major ‘tool-ready’ diseases with preventive chemotherapy (PC): lymphatic filariasis (LF), onchocerciasis, schistosomiasis, soil-transmitted helminthiasis (STH) and trachoma [10]. The World Health Organization (WHO) recommends that in highly endemic schistosomiasis communities (prevalence ≥50%), all school aged children (SAC) and ‘at risk’ adults should be treated with praziquantel (PZQ) annually. In moderately endemic communities (prevalence ≥10% and <50%), all SAC and ‘at risk’ adults should be treated biennially. In low endemic communities (prevalence <10%), all SAC should be treated twice during their primary school years [11]. ‘At risk’ adults include all those who have contact with contaminated fresh water sources: fishermen, farmers, alluvial miners, and those households that wash/play in schistosomiasis-contaminated water.

In Sierra Leone, the integrated national NTD control program (NTDCP) started in 2008 with financial support from the United States Agency for International Development (USAID) and technical assistance from Helen Keller International (HKI). One of the original goals of the national NTDCP was to reduce schistosomiasis prevalence in all districts to <10% [12].

Both forms of intestinal and urogenital schistosomiasis have been recognized as endemic in Sierra Leone [13, 14]. National mapping in 2008 to 2009 confirmed that the distribution of schistosomiasis was widespread, with moderate-high prevalence in the north-eastern part of the country [1517]. Mass drug administration (MDA) with PZQ was implemented in seven moderately-highly endemic districts: Kailahun, Kono, Koinadugu, Kenema, Bo, and the north-eastern chiefdoms of Tonkolili and Bombali. In 2009, MDA was piloted in six districts, targeting only school-going children. In 2010, MDA was scaled-up to target all SAC and at risk adults (in this case, all rural adults are at risk) in moderately-highly endemic chiefdoms for seven districts. The treatment frequency within districts varies according to the prevalence level in each chiefdom. Independent monitoring was conducted after MDA to assess drug coverage in 2011. A sentinel site survey was also conducted in 2012 after three rounds of MDA to assess the progress of the national NTDCP. The current paper presents the survey results and discusses the future treatment strategies, in line with the new global objective for the elimination of schistosomiasis.

Methods

MDA and data reporting

In Sierra Leone, PZQ was administered by the peripheral health unit (PHU) staff. This decision was made by the NTDCP at the beginning of the program due to the potential side effects of the PZQ treatment in the population that had never been treated. Each year, before MDA, PHU staff receives training or refresher training on PZQ distribution, including use of the dose poles, eligibility of the target population, data recording and reporting, and knowledge and management of potential side effects. Following social mobilization, school-going children received treatment at school-based distribution points, and out-of-school children and ‘at risk’ adults accessed treatment via community-based distribution. PHU staff update the registers for each village in their catchment areas before each MDA and estimate the drug need. They used tally sheets to record the number of PZQ administered during MDA. At the end of MDA, the PHU staff reported the population and treatment numbers to health districts that in turn, collated the data in each district and reported to the NTDCP.

Independent monitoring on MDA coverage

In July 2011, independent monitoring to assess program coverage, as described previously [18], was conducted seven days after the MDA. At least three villages were sampled per district, with 1 village from a WHO list of consistently low performing villages during immunization campaigns (WHO Sierra Leone, unpublished observation). Independent monitors used simple tally sheets to interview 60 SAC (30 males and 30 females), from classes 5–6 or 12–14 years of age in selected schools, and 60 adults in communities on whether they could recall taking PZQ. Independent monitoring was conducted in the seven endemic districts: Kailahun, Kono, Koinadugu, Kenema, Bo, Tonkolili and Bombali. In the community survey, independent monitors conducted interviews in both public locations and in randomly selected households. The results were compared with the NTDP reported coverage.

Sentinel site selection

This study was conducted in February 2012, seven months after the last MDA in 26 sentinel sites in the seven moderately-highly endemic districts. The sentinel sites were randomly selected from the baseline mapping survey sites, which were stratified according to the baseline prevalence into high, moderate or low endemic category. It was intended to select two sites from each endemic category within each district. Details of the baseline surveys have previously been described elsewhere [15, 16]. Thus, six sites were selected from Tonkolili district since it had all three prevalence categories, five sites from Bombali, four sites in both Kenema and Bo, three sites from Kailahun and two sites in Kono and Koinadugu districts respectively. In total, 12 sites had high baseline prevalence, 10 sites had moderate baseline prevalence and four sites had low baseline prevalence. The locations and baseline prevalence of each site is shown in Figure 1. In Bombali district, one heavily endemic site received two rounds of MDA (2010 and 2011) while the remaining four moderately endemic sites had received only one round of MDA in 2010. Yoni chiefdom in Tonkolili district had no MDA because of its low prevalence at baseline.
Figure 1

Sentinel site locations and S. mansoni prevalence in Sierra Leone. Numbers in blue represent the prevalence value at the baseline (the former) and after 3 rounds of MDA (the latter) for each sentinel site.

Sampling and data collection

A total of 50 SAC (25 males and 25 females) aged 10–14 years who were in the upper classes (classes 5–6) were randomly selected from each primary school in each site, according to WHO recommendations [19]. Each child was given a unique ID number, and their name, sex and age were recorded. Once recorded, each child was given one plastic container and asked to provide a fresh stool sample. All stool samples were examined (1 slide per sample) within five hours of collection by the Kato-Katz method and using a 41.7 mg thick faecal smear template [20, 21]. All positive slides and 10% of all negative slides were re-examined in the field by the more senior technicians for quality assurance. The number of S. mansoni eggs per gram of faeces was calculated by using a multiplier factor of 24.

Data analysis

Overall, 1,286 children (642 males and 644 females) were examined in the 26 sentinel sites during 2012. The results were compared to the data from the same sites surveyed at baseline (770 children: 373 males and 396 females, with one missing data point for sex). Data were analysed using SPSS statistical software (IBM, version 19). The SPSS Complex Samples Crosstabs was used to calculate the prevalence and the Complex Samples Descriptives was used to calculate the intensity of infection with 95% confidence intervals, taking into consideration the cluster nature of school children using district as strata and school as clusters. Samples were weighted according to the population sizes in the surveyed districts when calculating the overall prevalence and intensity of infection. The arithmetic mean intensity of infection from all the examined subjects (including both positive and negative) was used in the analysis. The individual S.mansoni infection was categorized as heavy (≥400 epg), moderate (100–399 epg), and light (1–99 epg) infections [22]. The Chi-square test was used to compare the prevalence, and the Kruskal Wallis test was used to compare the mean intensity of infection between 2009 and 2012. GPS coordinates were recorded and ArcView 10 software (ESRI, Redlands, CA) was used to plot sentinel site locations and prevalence level.

Ethical considerations

Ethical approval for the survey was obtained from the Ministry of Health and Sanitation, Sierra Leone. Community informed consent was obtained following discussion with District Medical Officers, Chiefdom school inspectors, head teachers and community-teachers associations. All communities included in the sentinel sites were sensitised prior to sample collection. Verbal individual consent was obtained from parents/carers as literacy rates are low in these communities. Children were also given information on the purpose of the activity prior to sample collection.

Results

MDA coverage

The reported annual treatment numbers and coverage by district are shown in Table 1. In 2009, targeted individuals were only primary school children, and in 2010 and 2011, the treatment expanded to include SAC both in and out of school and ‘at risk’ adults. Accordingly, 562,980 school children were treated in 2009 with program coverage of 94.8%; 1,831,383 persons were treated in 2010 with program coverage of 77.1%; and 1,781,037 persons were treated in 2011 with program coverage of 81.7%. Specifically for SAC in 2010 and 2011, 403,212 and 540,103 SAC were treated respectively for program coverage of 85.4% and 86.0% in the SAC population accordingly.
Table 1

Sierra Leone schistosomiasis treatment numbers and coverage 2009-11

District

2009 reported

2010 reported

2011 reported

2011 IM results

Targeted

Treated

%

Targeted

Treated

%

Targeted

Treated

%

Interviewed

Recalled

%

Bo

-

-

-

278,547

223,096

80.1

183,192

151,887

82.9

660

500

75.8

(121,467)

(110,300)

(90.8)

(75,679)

(63,545)

(84.0)

(113,500)

(98,196)

(87.0)

(360)

(288)

(80.0)

Bombali

N/A

N/A

N/A

135,705

107,253

79.0

21,810

17,921

82.2

720

625

86.8

(4,562)

(3,939)

(86.3)

(32,394)

(29,756)

(92.0)

(360)

(314)

(87.2)

Kailahun

-

-

-

417,899

336,014

80.4

438,952

364,249

83.3

1,414

1,138

80.5

(86,631)

(84,118)

(97.1)

(97,556)

(84,030)

(86.1)

(97,556)

(84,444)

(87.0)

(707)

(599)

(84.7)

Kenema

-

-

-

532,807

416,974

78.3

530,803

423,864

79.9

1,693

1,574

93.0

(156,496)

(151,203)

(96.6)

(100,439)

(84,868)

(84.5)

(102,443)

(89,764)

(88.0)

(754)

(671)

(89.0)

Koinadugu

-

-

-

387,289

261,416

67.5

341,987

274,206

80.2

1,620

1,306

80.6

(62,278)

(55,725)

(89.5)

(59,121)

(50,631)

(85.6)

(72,521)

(50,631)

(70.0)

(720)

(692)

(96.1)

Kono

-

-

-

422,204

326,535

77.3

495,787

405,123

81.7

1,438

1,261

87.7

(99,553)

(97,279)

(97.7)

(84,468)

(72,917)

(86.3)

(73,362)

(68,369)

(93.0)

(720)

(648)

(90.0)

Tonkolili

-

-

-

201,088

160,095

79.6

168,383

143,787

85.4

960

728

75.8

(67,276)

(64,355)

(95.7)

(50,122)

(43,282)

(86.4)

(135,069)

(118,943)

(86.0)

(480)

(389)

(81.0)

Overall

-

-

-

2,375,539

1,831,383

77.1

2,180,914

1,781,037

81.7

8,505

7,132

83.9

(593,701)

(562,980)

(94.8)

(471,947)

(403,212)

(85.4)

(626,845)

(540,103)

(86.0)

(2,467)

(2,195)

(89.0)

Note: Figures for SAC are shown in brackets.

In the 2011 independent monitoring, a total of 8,505 persons were interviewed, 7,132 persons recalled taking PZQ. This gave overall treatment coverage of 83.9% in people interviewed, and 89% in SAC (Table 1). Compared with the reported coverage in the same year, there was no significant difference between the reported coverage and the survey results (p > 0.05).

Prevalence of S. mansoni infection

The prevalence of S. mansoni infection from the sentinel sites is shown in Table 2 and Figure 1. The adjusted overall prevalence in all seven districts in 2012 was 16.3% (95% CI: 14.4-18.4%). This prevalence represents a 67.2% reduction from the baseline of 49.7% (95% CI: 46.2-53.3%) in 2009 (p < 0.001). Across the seven districts, except in Bombali where a 36% reduction was seen (p < 0.05), the other six districts had a 56-98% reduction in prevalence (p < 0.001). According to the baseline endemicity level, there was no significant change in prevalence in sites where the baseline endemicity level was low (p > 0.05), while there were significant reductions (68-70%) in prevalence in sites where the baseline endemicity level was moderate or high (p < 0.001). There was a similar reduction in prevalence in boys and girls.
Table 2

S. mansoni prevalence at sentinel sites in 2009 and 2012 in Sierra Leone

 

2009

2012

Change (%)

Number examined

Prevalence (%) (95% CI)

Number examined

Prevalence (%) (95% CI)

Overall

770

49.7 (46.2 - 53.3)

1290

16.3 (14.4 - 18.4)

−67.2

By district

     

  Bo

119

25.2 (18.3 - 33.7)

198

0.5 (0.1 - 2.8)

−98.0

  Bombali

142

27.5 (20.8 - 35.3)

239

17.6 (13.3 - 22.9)

−36.0

  Kailahun

90

60.0 (49.7 - 69.5)

149

16.8 (11.6 - 23.6)

−72.0

  Kenema

119

60.5 (51.5 - 68.8)

199

17.1 (12.5 - 22.9)

−71.7

  Koinadugu

60

83.3 (72.0 - 90.7)

100

36.0 (27.3 -45.8)

−56.8

  Kono

60

65.0 (52.4 - 75.8)

101

20.8 (14.0 - 29.7)

−68.0

  Tonkolili

180

35.0 (28.4 - 42.2)

304

12.2 (9.0 - 16.3)

−65.1

By baseline endemicity

    

  Low

118

4.1 (1.3 - 10.7)

201

8.7 (4.7 - 14.3)*

112.2

  Moderate

294

24.7 (19.8 - 30.0)

498

7.4 (5.3 - 10.1)

−70.0

  High

358

74.5 (70.1 - 78.4)

591

23.6 (20.6 - 26.9)

−68.3

By sex

     

  Boys

373

52.8 (47.7 - 57.8)

645

17.0 (14.2 - 20.0)

−67.8

  Girls

396

46.7 (41.7 - 51.5)

644

15.7 (13.1 - 18.7)

−66.4

*Change in prevalence in this group is not statistically significant (p = 0.109).

Intensity of S. mansoni infection

Table 3 summarizes the intensity of infection in 2009 and 2012. The adjusted mean intensity of infection in 2012 from all sentinel sites was 18.98 epg (95% CI: 11.46-26.50 epg). Compared with the baseline 134.53 epg (95% CI: 93.51-175.55 epg), there was a significant 85.9% reduction (p < 0.001). Across the seven districts, 61-99% reduction from the baseline was observed (p < 0.01). As for prevalence, there was no significant change in mean intensity of infection in sites where the baseline endemicity level was low (p > 0.05), while significant reduction by 70-88% was shown in sites where the baseline endemicity level was moderate or high (p < 0.001). A similar level of significant reduction in boys and girls was seen (both p < 0.001).
Table 3

S. mansoni intensity of infection at sentinel sites in 2009 and 2012 in Sierra Leone

 

2009

2012

Change (%)

Number examined

Mean intensity of infection (epg) (95% CI)

Number examined

Mean intensity of infection (epg) (95% CI)

Overall

770

134.53 (93.51 - 175.55)

1290

18.98 (11.46 - 26.50)

−85.9

By district

     

  Bo

119

35.09 (17.59 - 52.59)

198

0.12 (0–0.36)

−99.7

  Bombali

142

48.85 (27.67 - 70.02)

239

18.68 (5.95 - 31.41)

−61.8

  Kailahun

90

194.93 (116.14 - 273.73)

149

19.33 (8.62 - 30.03)

−90.1

  Kenema

119

191.60 (132.61 - 250.58)

199

25.69 (11.99 - 39.39)

−86.6

  Koinadugu

60

250.80 (180.44 - 321.16)

100

42.72 (24.86 - 60.58)

−83.0

  Kono

60

159.60 (87.16 - 232.04)

101

10.22 (5.66 - 14.78)

−93.6

  Tonkolili

180

91.33 (57.43 - 125.24)

304

24.87 (14.94 - 34.80)

−72.8

By baseline endemicity

    

  Low

118

9.25 (0–18.56)

201

15.50 (0–34.84)*

67.6

  Moderate

294

29.81 (19.14 - 40.48)

498

8.78 (2.79 - 14.76)

−70.5

  High

358

226.01 (153.79 - 298.23)

591

26.41 (13.18 - 39.64)

−88.3

By sex

     

  Boys

373

133.96 (80.79 - 187.13)

645

19.30 (9.30 - 29.30)

−85.6

  Girls

396

135.00 (72.98 - 197.02)

644

18.69 (7.45 - 29.94)

−86.2

*Change in intensity of infection in this group is not statistically significant (p = 0.26).

At baseline in 2009, 27% school age children were moderately or heavily infected with S.mansoni: 8.8% heavily and 18.2% moderately. After three years of implementation of MDA, the overall proportion of children moderately or heavily infected with S.mansoni was significantly reduced to 4.5%: 1.2% heavily and 3.3% moderately in 2012 (Figure 2).
Figure 2

Proportion (%) of different degrees of intensity of S. mansoni infection in school age children in 2009 and in 2012 in Sierra Leone. Error bars represent the 95% confidence intervals.

Discussion

Praziquantel MDA for schistosomiasis in Sierra Leone is part of the integrated national NTD control program. According to the national baseline mapping [1517], seven districts (Kailahun, Kono, Koinadugu, Kenema, Bo, Tonkolili and Bombali) had moderate or high levels of endemicity (prevalence ≥10% and <50%); five districts (Moyamba, Port Loko, Kambia, Pujehun and Rural Western Area) had low levels of endemicity (prevelance >0% and <10%); and two districts (Bonthe and Urban Western Area) were non-endemic. As the first phase of the control program, the PZQ distribution targets both school age children and at-risk adults for morbidity control in the seven moderately or highly endemic districts. Over the last three years, 77-95% program coverage has been achieved, which was validated by the independent monitoring survey. The high treatment coverage is important in NTD control programs using preventive chemotherapy strategy. The annual coverage achieved for schistosomiasis in Sierra Leone has surpassed the 75% coverage recommended by WHO [22]. The successful implementation of MDA in Sierra Leone was largely due to effective advocacy, social mobilization and program coordination at all levels and assisted by the introduction of independent monitoring during and after MDA. Trained independent monitors perform the ‘in process’ monitoring during the MDA to help identify MDA weaknesses, such as drug shortages, under-performing health workers, or high refusal rates within particular communities or sub-sections of communities, so that they could be reported to the NTDCP, and swift remedial action could be taken. They also perform the ‘end process’ monitoring after the MDA to collect coverage data independently and to validate the reported treatment coverage. Independent monitors also collect qualitative information, such as the misappropriation of MDA drugs, inappropriate dosage, lack of training or lack of dose poles or tally sheets.

WHO recommends conducting sentinel site surveys every 2–3 years after the start of the program implementation to assess the impact of the program [19]. As the first MDA targeted only school going children, the sentinel site survey was conducted after three years of MDA implementation when the communities and all school age children had received at least two rounds of MDA. The total cost for the survey was 13,260 US dollars, around 500 US dollars per sentinel site. The results showed that the overall prevalence of S.mansoni infection was significantly reduced by 67%, ranging from 36% to 98% in individual districts, and the intensity of infection was reduced by 85.9% with reductions ranging from 61% to 99% in various districts. Among the 26 sentinel sites, those with moderate or high endemicity levels at baseline showed significant reduction in both overall prevalence and mean intensity of infection. 12 sites had high prevalence (>50%) in 2009, and only two, which had 90% prevalence at baseline, still showed over 50% prevalence in 2012. It is not surprising that those sites with low endemicity level at baseline did not show significant change, in either overall prevalence or mean intensity of infection, as these were not program priority areas. However, it was noted that one of these low endemicity sites at baseline showed a significant increase in infection level over the three years (data not shown), suggesting that the national treatment strategy in low endemicity areas needs to be reviewed. As described in the previous publications, separate mapping surveys were conducted for S. mansoni and S. haematobium[15, 17]. Sentinel sites were selected based on the S. mansoni survey and most of the sites did not have S. haematobium baseline data for comparison. Therefore, S. haematobium data were not presented in this paper. It is also noted that the current survey was conducted a few weeks after lymphatic filariasis MDA with albendazole and ivermectin, STH data collected during the sentinel site survey were not included as it would significantly overestimate the impact of the program.

After two to three years of effective MDA, the WHO estimates that <1.0% of SAC should be heavily infected (>400epg) [19]. In our results, the proportion of heavy infection was reduced from 8.8% to 1.2% after three years of implementation. The severity of morbidity due to schistosomiasis is associated with the intensity of infection, especially in early childhood [23]. It is believed that serious morbidity may have been avoided or reversed as a result of effective MDA. Similar gains have been reported by other NTDCPs in both East and West Africa in their progress towards S. mansoni control and elimination [2429]. Despite the success in reducing the proportion of children heavily or moderately infected to 1.2% and 3.3% respectively, continued MDA is still needed to further bring down the prevalence and intensity of infection in school age children. It should be noted that there were 10.7% of children surveyed living with low intensity of infection in the seven districts. The consequences of morbidity due to light infections are sometimes underestimated and hence, overlooked in many control programmes. Recent studies have revealed that considerable morbidity due to diarrhea, chronic pain, under-nutrition, exercise intolerance and anaemia can result from even light infections [23, 27].

WHO recommends comprehensive control measures to achieve the elimination of schistosomiasis [3032]. In Sierra Leone, like many other countries currently implementing NTD control programs, the funding is limited to MDA, which leaves the other components of NTD control unfunded, such as water, sanitation and hygiene, and snail control. There will be a risk of recrudescence when MDA is stopped. In order to achieve the WHO target, there is a need for a full control approach which includes provision of safe water, improved personal hygiene and community sanitation and, intensified case management, veterinary public health at the human-animal interface, and vector and intermediate host control [32, 33].

Sanitation is a major problem in Sierra Leone. According to the Demographic and Health Survey, conducted in 2008, 87% of the population does not have access to improved toilet facilities [34]. The provision of proper sanitation facilities: proper toilet, laundry, hand washing and shower facilities and ensuring proper personal hygiene can help to reduce the disease burden. The provision of proper toilet facilities and ensuring that these toilets are used would help to sustain the current achievement. According to the same survey, 49.2% of the population does not have access to a clean water source [34]. The absence of clean drinking water can greatly increase the spread of water borne diseases, and the provision of piped water has been shown to reduce the prevalence of schistosomiasis in SAC. In south-east Brazil, for example, research showed that SAC were 2.3 times more likely to be infected if they had no piped water in their homes, and in Zimbabwe, the prevalence of S. mansoni among SAC who lived on communal lands that lacked piped-water supply was 4.8% compared to 0.8% of those that had piped water on the same land [35, 36].

Long-term schistosomiasis control and elimination will require health education, safe water sources for washing, and latrines in both schools and communities. In addition, behaviour change communication is needed to ensure the appropriate use of these facilities, to improve personal and environmental hygiene, and to reduce risk of re-infection. To this end, a closer collaboration among partners in relevant sectors, particularly education and water, sanitation and hygiene, is needed [37]. With the progress of the national program, the Ministry of Health and Sanitation will need to work with partners to mobilize resources to support such activities.

The World Health Assembly (WHA) resolution 65.21 calls on Member States to intensify schistosomiasis control efforts in most disease-endemic countries and to initiate interventions towards the elimination of schistosomiasis in low-transmission countries [31]. The WHO NTD control roadmap and the schistosomiasis strategic plan (2012–2020) have set the stage for the national control programs to achieve the elimination of schistosomiasis [30, 32]. The results from the current survey show that Sierra Leone has made significant progress in reducing morbidity due to schistosomiasis in seven moderately or highly endemic districts, as exemplified by the significant reduction in S. mansoni infection and particularly, by the reduction in the intensity of infection. In line with the new elimination objectives set by WHO, the national NTDCP has reviewed the national treatment strategy and decided to target school age children for the next MDA in five coastal districts (Moyamba, Port Loko, Kambia, Pujehun and Rural Western area) where low prevalence (>0% and <10%) was found during the national baseline mapping. It is expected that a national re-assessment of the endemic situation of schistosomiasis will be conducted after 5 or 6 rounds of MDA according to the WHO recommendations [19], and the treatment strategy will be re-aligned. It is hoped that by adjusting the treatment strategy and expanding national coverage, Sierra Leone will be on course to be one of the first sub-Saharan African countries to achieve elimination of schistosomiasis as a public health problem.

Conclusions

The national NTD control program in Sierra Leone has implemented PZQ MDA in seven moderately or highly endemic districts, targeting school age children and at-risk adults for three years. Significant progress has been made in reducing the prevalence and intensity of S. mansoni infection, as shown by the sentinel site survey conducted in 2012. The national program has reviewed the current treatment strategy and is expected to expand the treatment coverage to include school age children in low endemicity districts in alignment with the new national objective for the elimination of schistosomiasis. Sierra Leone is well on its way to eliminate schistosomiasis as a public health problem.

Notes

Declarations

Acknowledgements

This study was made possible with funding from the United States Agency for International Development (USAID) through a grant to Helen Keller International under Cooperative Agreement No. GHS-A-00-06-00006-00 with the End in Africa program managed by FHI360. The contents are the responsibility of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views of USAID or the United States Government. The authors would like to thank Ali Tia, Sam Saffa, Abdul Kamara and JB Koroma for their participation in the field and/or laboratory work.

Authors’ Affiliations

(1)
Neglected Tropical Disease Control Program, Ministry of Health and Sanitation
(2)
Helen Keller International
(3)
Helen Keller International, Regional Office for Africa

References

  1. Steinmann P, Keiser J, Bos R, Tanner M, Utzinger J: Schistosomiasis and water resources development: systematic review, meta-analysis, and estimates of people at risk. Lancet Infect Dis. 2006, 6 (7): 411-425. 10.1016/S1473-3099(06)70521-7.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. Hotez PJ, Molyneux DH, Fenwick A, Kumaresan J, Sachs SE, Sachs JD, Savioli L: Control of neglected tropical diseases. N Engl J Med. 2007, 357 (10): 1018-1027. 10.1056/NEJMra064142.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. Savioli L, Albonico M, Engels D, Montresor A: Progress in the prevention and control of schistosomiasis and soil-transmitted helminthiasis. Parasitol Int. 2004, 53 (2): 103-113. 10.1016/j.parint.2004.01.001.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. Stephenson LS, Latham MC, Kurz KM, Miller D, Kinoti SN, Oduori ML: Urinary iron loss and physical fitness of Kenyan children with urinary schistosomiasis. Am J Trop Med Hyg. 1985, 34 (2): 322-330.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. Friedman JF, Kanzaria HK, Acosta LP, Langdon GC, Manalo DL, Wu H, Olveda RM, McGarvey ST, Kurtis JD: Relationship between Schistosoma japonicum and nutritional status among children and young adults in Leyte, the Philippines. Am J Trop Med Hyg. 2005, 72 (5): 527-533.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. Olson CL, Acosta LP, Hochberg NS, Olveda RM, Jiz M, McGarvey ST, Kurtis JD, Bellinger DC, Friedman JF: Anemia of inflammation is related to cognitive impairment among children in Leyte, the Philippines. PLoS Negl Trop Dis. 2009, 3 (10): e533-10.1371/journal.pntd.0000533.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. Stephenson LS, Latham MC, Ottesen EA: Malnutrition and parasitic helminth infections. Parasitology. 2000, 121 (Suppl): S23-S38.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. Guyatt H: Do intestinal nematodes affect productivity in adulthood?. Parasitol Today. 2000, 16 (4): 153-158. 10.1016/S0169-4758(99)01634-8.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. Hotez PJ, Brindley PJ, Bethony JM, King CH, Pearce EJ, Jacobson J: Helminth infections: the great neglected tropical diseases. J Clin Invest. 2008, 118 (4): 1311-1321. 10.1172/JCI34261.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. Zhang Y, MacArthur C, Mubila L, Baker S: Control of neglected tropical diseases needs a long-term commitment. BMC Med. 2010, 8: 67-10.1186/1741-7015-8-67.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. World Health Organization: Preventive chemotherapy in human helminthiasis: coordinated use of anthelminthic drugs in control interventions. 2006, Geneva: World Health OrganizationGoogle Scholar
  12. Ministry of Health and Sanitation: Sierra Leone Neglected Tropical Disease Control Master Plan 2011–2015. 2012, Sierra Leone: Freetown: Ministry of Health and SanitationGoogle Scholar
  13. Gbakima AA, Sahr F: Intestinal parasitic infections among rural farming communities in eastern Sierra Leone. Afr J Med Med Sci. 1995, 24 (2): 195-200.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. World Health Organization: Atlas of global distribution of schistosomiasis. [http://www.who.int/schistosomiasis/epidemiology/en/sierraleone_liberia.pdf]
  15. Koroma JB, Peterson J, Gbakima AA, Nylander FE, Sahr F, Soares Magalhaes RJ, Zhang Y, Hodges MH: Geographical distribution of intestinal schistosomiasis and soil-transmitted helminthiasis and preventive chemotherapy strategies in Sierra Leone. PLoS Negl Trop Dis. 2010, 4 (11): e891-10.1371/journal.pntd.0000891.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. Hodges M, Dada N, Wamsley A, Paye J, Nyorkor E, Sonnie M, Barnish G, Bockarie M, Zhang Y: Improved mapping strategy to better inform policy on the control of schistosomiasis and soil-transmitted helminthiasis in Sierra Leone. Parasit Vectors. 2011, 4: 97-10.1186/1756-3305-4-97.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. Hodges MH, Soares Magalhaes RJ, Paye J, Koroma JB, Sonnie M, Clements A, Zhang Y: Combined spatial prediction of schistosomiasis and soil-transmitted helminthiasis in sierra leone: a tool for integrated disease control. PLoS Negl Trop Dis. 2012, 6 (6): e1694-10.1371/journal.pntd.0001694.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. Hodges MH, Sonnie M, Turay H, Conteh A, Maccarthy F, Sesay S: Maintaining effective mass drug administration for lymphatic filariasis through in-process monitoring in Sierra Leone. Parasit Vectors. 2012, 5: 232-10.1186/1756-3305-5-232.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. World Health Organization: Helminth control in school-age children: a guide for managers of control programmes. 2012, Geneva: World Health Organization, 2Google Scholar
  20. World Health Organization: Basic methods in medical parasitology laboratory. 1991, Geneva: World Health OrganizationGoogle Scholar
  21. World Health Organization: Bench aids for the diagnosis of intestinal parasites. 1994, Geneva: World Health OrganizationGoogle Scholar
  22. World Health Organization: Prevention and control of schistosomiasis and soil-transmitted helminthiasis. WHO Tech Rep Ser. 2002, 912: 32-33.Google Scholar
  23. King CH, Dangerfield-Cha M: The unacknowledged impact of chronic schistosomiasis. Chronic Illn. 2008, 4 (1): 65-79. 10.1177/1742395307084407.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. Kabatereine NB, Brooker S, Koukounari A, Kazibwe F, Tukahebwa EM, Fleming FM, Zhang Y, Webster JP, Stothard JR, Fenwick A: Impact of a national helminth control programme on infection and morbidity in Ugandan schoolchildren. Bull World Health Organ. 2007, 85 (2): 91-99. 10.2471/BLT.06.030353.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  25. Koukounari A, Gabrielli AF, Toure S, Bosque-Oliva E, Zhang Y, Sellin B, Donnelly CA, Fenwick A, Webster JP: Schistosoma haematobium infection and morbidity before and after large-scale administration of praziquantel in Burkina Faso. J Infect Dis. 2007, 196 (5): 659-669. 10.1086/520515.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  26. Landoure A, Dembele R, Goita S, Kane M, Tuinsma M, Sacko M, Toubali E, French MD, Keita AD, Fenwick A: Significantly reduced intensity of infection but persistent prevalence of schistosomiasis in a highly endemic region in mali after repeated treatment. PLoS Negl Trop Dis. 2012, 6 (7): e1774-10.1371/journal.pntd.0001774.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  27. Tohon ZB, Mainassara HB, Garba A, Mahamane AE, Bosque-Oliva E, Ibrahim ML, Duchemin JB, Chanteau S, Boisier P: Controlling schistosomiasis: significant decrease of anaemia prevalence one year after a single dose of praziquantel in Nigerian schoolchildren. PLoS Negl Trop Dis. 2008, 2 (5): e241-10.1371/journal.pntd.0000241.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  28. Touré S, Zhang Y, Bosque-Oliva E, Ky C, Ouedraogo A, Koukounari A, Gabrielli AF, Bertrand S, Webster JP, Fenwick A: Two-year impact of single praziquantel treatment on infection in the national control programme on schistosomiasis in Burkina Faso. Bull World Health Organ. 2008, 86 (10): 780-787. 10.2471/BLT.07.048694.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  29. Zhang Y, Koukounari A, Kabatereine N, Fleming F, Kazibwe F, Tukahebwa E, Stothard JR, Webster JP, Fenwick A: Parasitological impact of 2-year preventive chemotherapy on schistosomiasis and soil-transmitted helminthiasis in Uganda. BMC Med. 2007, 5: 27-10.1186/1741-7015-5-27.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  30. World Health Organization: Accelerating work to overcome the global impact of neglected tropical diseases - a roadmap for implementation. 2012, Geneva: World Health OrganizationGoogle Scholar
  31. World Health Organization: Elimination of schistosomiasis. World Health Assembly, Resolution 65.21. [http://apps.who.int/gb/ebwha/pdf_files/WHA65/A65_21-en.pdf.]
  32. World Health Organization: Schistosomiasis: progress report 2001–2011 and strategic plan 2012–2020. 2012, Geneva: World Health OrganizationGoogle Scholar
  33. World Health Organization: Working to overcome the global impact of neglected tropical diseases - First WHO report on neglected tropical diseases. 2010, Geneva: World Health OrganizationGoogle Scholar
  34. Statistics Sierra Leone and ICF Macro: Sierra Leone demographic and health survey 2008. 2009, Calverton, Maryland, USA: Statistics Sierra Leone and ICF MacroGoogle Scholar
  35. Costa MF L e, Magalhaes MH, Rocha RS, Antunes CM, Katz N: Water-contact patterns and socioeconomic variables in the epidemiology of schistosomiasis mansoni in an endemic area in Brazil. Bull World Health Organ. 1987, 65 (1): 57-66.Google Scholar
  36. Mason PR, Patterson BA, Loewenson R: Piped water supply and intestinal parasitism in Zimbabwean schoolchildren. Trans R Soc Trop Med Hyg. 1986, 80 (1): 88-93. 10.1016/0035-9203(86)90204-X.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  37. Freeman MC, Ogden S, Jacobson J, Abbott D, Addiss DG, Amnie AG, Beckwith C, Cairncross S, Callejas R, Colford JM: Integration of water, sanitation, and hygiene for the prevention and control of neglected tropical diseases: a rationale for inter-sectoral collaboration. PLoS Negl Trop Dis. 2013, 7 (9): e2439-10.1371/journal.pntd.0002439.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright

© Sesay et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2014

This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.

Comments

By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.

Advertisement