Open Access

Absence of Wolbachia endobacteria in the human parasitic nematode Dracunculus medinensis and two related Dracunculus species infecting wildlife

  • Jeremy M Foster1Email author,
  • Frédéric Landmann2,
  • Louise Ford3,
  • Kelly L Johnston3,
  • Sarah C Elsasser4,
  • Albrecht I Schulte-Hostedde4,
  • Mark J Taylor3 and
  • Barton E Slatko1
Parasites & Vectors20147:140

https://doi.org/10.1186/1756-3305-7-140

Received: 23 December 2013

Accepted: 20 March 2014

Published: 31 March 2014

Abstract

Background

Wolbachia endosymbionts are a proven target for control of human disease caused by filarial nematodes. However, little is known about the occurrence of Wolbachia in taxa closely related to the superfamily Filarioidea. Our study addressed the status of Wolbachia presence in members of the superfamily Dracunculoidea by screening the human parasite Dracunculus medinensis and related species from wildlife for Wolbachia.

Findings

D. medinensis, D. lutrae and D. insignis specimens were all negative for Wolbachia colonization by PCR screening for the Wolbachia ftsZ, 16S rRNA and Wolbachia surface protein (wsp) sequences. The quality and purity of the DNA preparations was confirmed by amplification of nematode 18S rRNA and cytochrome c oxidase subunit I sequences. Furthermore, Wolbachia endobacteria were not detected by whole mount fluorescence staining, or by immunohistochemistry using a Wolbachia-specific antiserum. In contrast, positive control Brugia malayi worms were shown to harbour Wolbachia by PCR, fluorescence staining and immunohistochemistry.

Conclusions

Three examined species of Dracunculus showed no evidence of Wolbachia endobacteria. This supports that members of the superfamily Dracunculoidea are free of Wolbachia. Within the order Spirurida, these endosymbionts appear restricted to the Filarioidea.

Keywords

Dracunculus Wolbachia Guinea worm

Findings

With the exception of Loa loa, all examined filarial nematodes that infect humans as their definitive host contain Wolbachia. These obligate intracellular symbionts have emerged as a novel target for filarial disease control [13]. Filarial species containing Wolbachia predominantly fall within the subfamilies Onchocercinae and Dirofilariinae of the family Onchocercidae, although Madathamugadia hiepei (subfamily Splendidofilariinae) is also colonized [4]. As a result, there has been extensive screening for Wolbachia in these taxa leading to the hypothesis that ancestral acquisition of Wolbachia occurred in the lineage leading to these subfamilies [57]. Screening for Wolbachia presence in phylogenetically divergent nematode species has consistently failed to identify these endobacteria [8, 9], with the exception of an intriguing indication of a Wolbachia-like endosymbiont in the plant-parasitic Tylenchid nematode Radopholus similis[10, 11]. However, apart from sampling within the Onchocercidae where Wolbachia are well known, there has been almost no screening of closely related families within the superfamily Filarioidea or within sister superfamilies within the order Spirurida.

Dracunculus medinensis is a member of the superfamily Dracunculoidea, a taxon closely related to the Filarioidea within the order Spirurida. Members of these two superfamilies have similar general morphology, are all tissue dwelling parasites, ovoviviparous, and use arthropod intermediate hosts. For these reasons, the two taxa are frequently discussed as a broader filarial nematode group [12]. However, Dracunculus species can be distinguished from true filarial nematodes by certain morphological features, molecular phylogenies and life cycle differences. For example, unlike filarial nematodes, the first stage larvae of Dracunculus species are expelled into the environment from where they can be ingested by non-haematophagous intermediate hosts (copepods). Infection of the mammalian host occurs after ingestion of the copepod and migration of third stage larvae through the intestinal wall as opposed to filarial transmission via blood feeding of the arthropod host. D. medinensis, perhaps the longest nematode infecting humans, was until recently a major cause of human morbidity infecting ~3.5 million individuals in Africa and Asia. Despite tremendous progress towards eradication of D. medinensis by the global Guinea Worm Eradication Program, dracunculiasis persists in 4 African nations due, in part, to resource limitations, political instability and civil war [1317]. Although prospects for complete eradication remain promising, positive identification of Wolbachia endobacteria in D. medinensis would offer another reagent in the elimination toolbox. Targeting Wolbachia with doxycycline is validated as a control method for human filariasis and is a therapy particularly well suited to individual treatment rather than mass drug administration. Delivering doxycycline to the ~500 remaining dracunculiasis patients would be a realistic goal and assist in containment of the disease since a long-lasting sterility of filarial nematodes is an early consequence of antibiotic treatment [3].

We undertook screening for the possible presence of Wolbachia in the human pathogen D. medinensis and in D. lutrae and D. insignis recovered from wildlife since they are representatives of the Dracunculoidea, a taxonomic group for which no information on the occurrence of Wolbachia endosymbionts is available.

Parasite specimens and DNA extraction

Three sections of female D. medinensis obtained from different specimens recovered from human infections in Ghana were provided by Dr Mark Eberhard, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Athens, GA. Specimens of D. lutrae and D. insignis were recovered from otter (Lontra canadensis) and mink (Neovison vison), respectively in Ontario, Canada as described [18]. The parasite material was stored in ethanol at -20°C prior to extraction of genomic DNA by standard procedures.

PCR and DNA sequencing

The suitability of the extracted gDNA for PCR was examined by attempted amplification of part of the nematode 18S rRNA gene. Primers Drac18Sf 5′-ACTGGAGGAGGAATCCAACGTGCTATGT-3′ and Drac18Sr 5′-TGTGTACAAAGGGCAGGGACGTAA-3′ were designed based on 18S rRNA sequences of D. medinensis, D. lutrae and D. insignis [GenBank: AY947720, GenBank: JF934737, GenBank: AY947719]. PCR reactions (25 μl) used Q5 High-Fidelity 2X Master Mix (New England Biolabs) with 0.5 μM each primer and ~50 ng DNA. Cycling consisted of one cycle of 98°C for 1.5 min, followed by 30 cycles of 98°C, 10 s; 71°C, 20 s; 72°C, 20 s, then a final extension at 72°C for 2 min. The PCR products were cloned into the SmaI site of pUC19 (New England Biolabs) and sequenced on both strands using a 3730xl DNA Analyzer (Applied Biosystems). Identical 166 bp sequences were obtained which matched exactly the 18S rRNA sequences from these 3 species available in the NCBI database. Additional Barcode of Life primers for cytochrome c oxidase subunit 1 (COI) [19] were redesigned based on the D. medinensis mitochondrial genome sequence [GenBank: JN555591]. PCR, cloning and sequencing were as described for 18S rRNA, but PCR used primers DracCOIf 5′-AAAGGACTAATCATAAGGATATTGG-3′ and DracCOIr 5′-TAAACCTCAGGATGACCAAAAAATCA-3′ and a 61°C annealing temperature. Distinct 655 bp sequences were obtained from each species, which matched respective COI sequences in the NCBI database [GenBank: EU646545, GenBank: EU646601, GenBank: HQ216219] at ≥ 99% nucleotide identity. This confirmed the correct identification of each Dracunculus species, which was necessary since both D. insignis and D. lutrae infect the otter [18].

The possible presence of Wolbachia was examined by screening for the Wolbachia 16S rRNA gene and the genes encoding FtsZ and Wsp (Wolbachia surface protein). These genes are routinely used for Wolbachia identification and phylogenetic analyses [5, 20, 21]. The primers for 16S rRNA (16SwolbF, 16SwolbR3), ftsZ (ftsZ357F, ftsZ788R) and wsp (wsp81F, wsp691R) have been detailed elsewhere [22]. PCR was performed as described above for nematode 18S rRNA except that the annealing temperatures were 57°C for wsp and 61°C for 16S rRNA and ftsZ. No PCR products were obtained from any of the Dracunculus DNA samples when attempting amplification of these three Wolbachia sequences. In contrast, the correct amplicons were generated from B. malayi DNA (data not shown).

Whole mount fluorescence staining

Portions of female worms of all three Dracunculus species were examined for Wolbachia presence by whole mount fluorescence staining. Female B. malayi were used as a positive control. Worms were fixed, treated with RNase A (Sigma) at 10 mg/ml in PBS, and their DNA stained using propidium iodide (Molecular Probes), then subsequently imaged as described previously [23]. Wolbachia were not detected in either the lateral cords or embryos/microfilariae of any Dracunculus species (Figure 1). A few punctate dots of staining were observed in the lateral cord region of D. medinensis (Figure 1, Panels A, A’) but these were approximately 4 μm in diameter and, therefore, considerably larger than Wolbachia. We believe these are nuclei of nematode cells in tissue lying beneath the hypodermis. In contrast, abundant Wolbachia were observed in both the cords and embryos of B. malayi (Figure 1, Panels D, D’).
Figure 1

Cellular analysis indicates absence of endosymbionts in Dracunculus species. Tissues from D. medinensis (A), D. lutrae (B) and D. insignis (C) were stained with propidium iodide as described [23] and compared to Wolbachia-harbouring Brugia malayi tissues (D). A, A’, B, D and C, lateral hypodermal cords (scale bar = 50 μm); B’, C’ and D’, embryos (scale bar = 10μm); A” and D”, microfilariae (scale bar = 50 μm). The bars at top left of the panels represent the length of half a cord. In panels A and A’, arrows point to smaller nuclei of about 4 μm, from tissue underlying the hypodermis. In panels D, D’ and D”, long arrows point to Wolbachia foci.

Immunohistochemistry

Segments of female D. medinensis were prepared for sectioning and immunohistochemistry using a rabbit polyclonal antiserum raised to WSP as described previously [22]. B. malayi served as a positive control and tetracycline-treated B. malayi (Wolbachia-depleted) were used in comparison to show the specificity of the anti-WSP serum. Sections of D. medinensis consistently showed no anti-WSP staining (Figure 2). In contrast, abundant staining was observed in the lateral cords of the B. malayi positive control. Staining in B. malayi was not observed when worms previously exposed to a 6 week tetracycline treatment to deplete their endosymbionts were examined. This differential staining of tetracycline-treated and untreated B. malayi proved that the positive staining is due to Wolbachia.
Figure 2

Anti-WSP staining in transverse sections of D. medinensis and B. malayi . Wolbachia are shown as red punctate staining in the lateral hypodermal cords of B. malayi (A) but are absent from D. medinensis (B and D) as well as in tetracycline-treated B. malayi (C). Solid red arrows highlight Wolbachia within the hypodermal cords. Open black arrows indicate uteri containing developing embryos. B. malayi images are x200 magnification. D. medinensis images are x40 (B) and x100 magnification (D). Scale bars = 100 μm.

In conclusion, we screened the human parasitic nematode D. medinensis as well as D. lutrae and D. insignis recovered from Canadian wildlife for the presence of Wolbachia endosymbionts. All three species were negative for each of three Wolbachia sequences screened for by PCR using primer pairs previously used for Wolbachia screening of filarial nematodes [5, 21, 22, 24]. Notably, the wsp and 16S rRNA primer pairs have previously been used to amplify corresponding sequences from more divergent Wolbachia strains that infect arthropods [24, 25], implying that our inability to amplify from Dracunculus samples was not due to sequence divergence. Amplification of Dracunculus 18S rRNA and COI sequences demonstrated the suitability of the DNA preparations for use in PCR and confirmed correct identity of the three species.

We were unable to detect Wolbachia in the three Dracunculus species by whole mount fluorescence staining, or in D. medinensis by immunohistochemistry using an anti-WSP serum that cross-reacts with Wolbachia from diverse filarial nematodes and Aedes albopictus mosquitos [2, 26, 27]. In contrast, in all experiments, our positive control B. malayi gave clear evidence of Wolbachia infection. The correct PCR amplicons were generated from B. malay i DNA and Wolbachia were readily visualized by both whole mount fluorescence and immunohistochemistry, indicating that the reagents and methodologies used were appropriate.

Our finding that three species of Dracunculus lack detectable Wolbachia supports that all members of the genus lack these endobacteria and precludes use of doxycycline as an additional tool in the efforts to finally eradicate human dracunculiasis. This is the first report of Wolbachia screening in the superfamily Dracunculoidea. The apparent lack of Wolbachia infection in members of this taxon is consistent with the notion that within the order Spirurida these endosymbionts are restricted to the superfamily Filarioidea and, more specifically, the family Onchocercidae [5, 7].

Declarations

Acknowledgements

For financial support we thank New England Biolabs and the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation for support of the A-WOL consortium through their grant to the Liverpool School of Tropical Medicine. We thank Dr. Don Comb for his continued interest and support.

Authors’ Affiliations

(1)
Parasitology Division, New England Biolabs
(2)
Centre de Biochimie Macromoléculaire, CNRS
(3)
Department of Parasitology, Liverpool School of Tropical Medicine
(4)
Department of Biology, Laurentian University

References

  1. Foster JM, Hoerauf A, Slatko BE, Taylor MJ: The Wolbachia Bacterial Endosymbionts of Filarial Nematodes. Parasitic Nematodes Molecular Biology, Biochemistry and Immunology. Edited by: Kennedy MW, Harnett W. 2013, Wallingford: CABI, 308-336. 2View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  2. McGarry HF, Pfarr K, Egerton G, Hoerauf A, Akue JP, Enyong P, Wanji S, Klager SL, Bianco AE, Beeching NJ, Taylor MJ: Evidence against Wolbachia symbiosis in Loa loa. Filaria J. 2003, 2: 9-10.1186/1475-2883-2-9.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. Taylor MJ, Hoerauf A, Bockarie M: Lymphatic filariasis and onchocerciasis. Lancet. 2010, 376: 1175-1185. 10.1016/S0140-6736(10)60586-7.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. Lefoulon E, Gavotte L, Junker K, Barbuto M, Uni S, Landmann F, Laaksonen S, Saari S, Nikander S, de Souza Lima S, Casiraghi M, Bain O, Martin C: A new type F Wolbachia from splendidofilariinae (Onchocercidae) supports the recent emergence of this supergroup. Int J Parasitol. 2012, 42: 1025-1036. 10.1016/j.ijpara.2012.09.004.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. Casiraghi M, Bain O, Guerrero R, Martin C, Pocacqua V, Gardner SL, Franceschi A, Bandi C: Mapping the presence of Wolbachia pipientis on the phylogeny of filarial nematodes: evidence for symbiont loss during evolution. Int J Parasitol. 2004, 34: 191-203. 10.1016/j.ijpara.2003.10.004.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. Ferri E, Bain O, Barbuto M, Martin C, Lo N, Uni S, Landmann F, Baccei SG, Guerrero R, de Souza Lima S, Bandi C, Wanji S, Diagne M, Casiraghi M: New insights into the evolution of Wolbachia infections in filarial nematodes inferred from a large range of screened species. PLoS One. 2011, 6: e20843-10.1371/journal.pone.0020843.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. Taylor MJ, Bandi C, Hoerauf A: Wolbachia bacterial endosymbionts of filarial nematodes. Adv Parasitol. 2005, 60: 245-284.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. Bordenstein SR, Fitch DH, Werren JH: Absence of Wolbachia in nonfilariid nematodes. J Nematol. 2003, 35: 266-270.PubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. Duron O, Gavotte L: Absence of Wolbachia in nonfilariid worms parasitizing arthropods. Curr Microbiol. 2007, 55: 193-197. 10.1007/s00284-006-0578-4.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. Haegeman A, Vanholme B, Jacob J, Vandekerckhove TT, Claeys M, Borgonie G, Gheysen G: An endosymbiotic bacterium in a plant-parasitic nematode: member of a new Wolbachia supergroup. Int J Parasitol. 2009, 39: 1045-1054. 10.1016/j.ijpara.2009.01.006.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. Jacob J, Mitreva M, Vanholme B, Gheysen G: Exploring the transcriptome of the burrowing nematode Radopholus similis. Mol Genet Genomics. 2008, 280: 1-17. 10.1007/s00438-008-0340-7.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. Hotez PJ: Forgotten People, Forgotten Diseases. 2013, Washington DC: ASM Press, 2Google Scholar
  13. Awofeso N: Towards global Guinea worm eradication in 2015: the experience of South Sudan. Int J Infect Dis. 2013, 17: e577-e582. 10.1016/j.ijid.2013.03.003.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. Cairncross S, Tayeh A, Korkor AS: Why is dracunculiasis eradication taking so long?. Trends Parasitol. 2012, 28: 225-230. 10.1016/j.pt.2012.03.003.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. CDC: Progress toward global eradication of dracunculiasis, January 2011-June 2012. MMWR. 2012, 61: 854-857.Google Scholar
  16. Hopkins DR, Ruiz-Tiben E, Weiss A, Withers PC, Eberhard ML, Roy SL: Dracunculiasis eradication: and now, South Sudan. Am J Trop Med Hyg. 2013, 89: 5-10. 10.4269/ajtmh.13-0090.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. Visser BJ: Dracunculiasis eradication–finishing the job before surprises arise. Asian Pac J Trop Med. 2012, 5: 505-510. 10.1016/S1995-7645(12)60088-1.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. Elsasser SC, Floyd R, Hebert PD, Schulte-Hostedde AI: Species identification of North American guinea worms (Nematoda: Dracunculus) with DNA barcoding. Mol Ecol Resour. 2009, 9: 707-712. 10.1111/j.1755-0998.2008.02393.x.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. Folmer O, Black M, Hoeh W, Lutz R, Vrijenhoek R: DNA primers for amplification of mitochondrial cytochrome c oxidase subunit I from diverse metazoan invertebrates. Mol Mar Biol Biotechnol. 1994, 3: 294-299.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. Bandi C, Anderson TJ, Genchi C, Blaxter ML: Phylogeny of Wolbachia in filarial nematodes. Proc Biol Sci. 1998, 265: 2407-2413. 10.1098/rspb.1998.0591.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. Bazzocchi C, Jamnongluk W, O’Neill SL, Anderson TJ, Genchi C, Bandi C: wsp gene sequences from the Wolbachia of filarial nematodes. Curr Microbiol. 2000, 41: 96-100. 10.1007/s002840010100.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. Foster JM, Kumar S, Ford L, Johnston KL, Ben R, Graeff-Teixeira C, Taylor MJ: Absence of Wolbachia endobacteria in the non-filariid nematodes Angiostrongylus cantonensis and A. costaricensis. Parasit Vectors. 2008, 1: 31-10.1186/1756-3305-1-31.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. Landmann F, Foster JM, Slatko B, Sullivan W: Asymmetric Wolbachia segregation during early Brugia malayi embryogenesis determines its distribution in adult host tissues. PLoS Negl Trop Dis. 2010, 4: e758-10.1371/journal.pntd.0000758.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. Casiraghi M, Anderson TJ, Bandi C, Bazzocchi C, Genchi C: A phylogenetic analysis of filarial nematodes: comparison with the phylogeny of Wolbachia endosymbionts. Parasitology. 2001, 122: 93-103. 10.1017/S0031182000007149.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  25. Zhou W, Rousset F, O’Neil S: Phylogeny and PCR-based classification of Wolbachia strains using wsp gene sequences. Proc Biol Sci. 1998, 265: 509-515. 10.1098/rspb.1998.0324.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  26. McGarry HF, Egerton GL, Taylor MJ: Population dynamics of Wolbachia bacterial endosymbionts in Brugia malayi. Mol Biochem Parasitol. 2004, 135: 57-67. 10.1016/j.molbiopara.2004.01.006.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  27. Turner JD, Langley RS, Johnston KL, Egerton G, Wanji S, Taylor MJ: Wolbachia endosymbiotic bacteria of Brugia malayi mediate macrophage tolerance to TLR- and CD40-specific stimuli in a MyD88/TLR2-dependent manner. J Immunol. 2006, 177: 1240-1249.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright

© Foster et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2014

This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly credited. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.

Comments

By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.

Advertisement