- Short report
- Open Access
Candidatus Neoehrlichia mikurensis and its co-circulation with Anaplasma phagocytophilum in Ixodes ricinus ticks across ecologically different habitats of Central Europe
© Derdáková et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2014
- Received: 2 February 2014
- Accepted: 25 March 2014
- Published: 2 April 2014
Candidatus Neoehrlichia mikurensis is a newly emerging tick-borne bacterium from the family Anaplasmataceae. Its presence in Ixodes ricinus ticks was reported from various European countries, however, it’s ecology and co-circulation with another member of the same family, Anaplasma phagocytophilum has not been rigorously studied yet.
Candidatus N. mikurensis was detected in all sampling sites. In total, 4.5% of ticks were positive including larvae. The highest positivity was detected in Austria with a prevalence of 23.5%. The probability of Candidatus N. mikurensis occurrence increased with the proportion of ticks infected with Anaplasma phagocytophilum.
A positive association between the occurrences of Candidatus N. mikurensis and A. phagocytophilum indicates that both bacteria share similar ecology for their natural foci in Central Europe.
- Candidatus Neoehrlichia mikurensis
- Anaplasma phagocytophilum
- Ixodes ricinus
- Human granulocytic anaplasmosis
In Europe, Candidatus N. mikurensis represents a newly emerging tick-borne zoonotic bacterium from the family Anaplasmataceae. Phylogenetic analyses revealed that it is closely related to the Ehrlichia-like microorganisms previously detected in ticks and rodents from various regions of Europe and Asia [1–6]. Recently its pathogenicity was reported, as it was detected in immunosuppressed patients with septicaemia [7–9]. Rodents are the competent reservoir hosts since they develop a systemic infection [1, 3, 4, 6] and are able transmit Candidatus N. mikurensis to the xenodiagnostic ticks . The prevalence of Candidatus N. mikurensis in ticks over Europe varies, usually not exceeding 10%. Most reports are from Western Europe [2, 4, 5, 11]. Recently it was reported in questing I. ricinus from Hungary  and Austria . Here we report the prevalence of Candidatus N. mikurensis from 11 diverse ecological habitats from three Central European countries and its co-circulation in natural foci with Anaplasma phagocytophilum.
Prevalence of Candidatus N. mikurensis (CNM) and A. phagocytophilum (AP) in I. ricinus ticks from sampling sites in Slovakia, the Czech Republic and Austria
Number of ticks tested*
Ca. N. mikurensis positive (%)
A. phagocytophilum positive (%)
Habitat type and altitude
Oak-beech, suburban and urban forests
Native fragmented, dry oak forest
Urban park with maples, oak hornbeam
Záhorská Ves (SK)
Farmland and pine lowland forest
Martinské hole (SK)
Mountain spruce forest
Oak-hornbeam urban forest
Oak, beech, maple, birch suburban
Dvur Kralove (CZ)
Mixed and pine suburban forest
Mountain fir forest
Alder and ash forest
Candidatus N. mikurensis was detected in all 11 sampling sites. In total, 69 (4.5%) of 1535 ticks were positive. The prevalence of Candidatus N. mikurensis ranged from 1.1% to 23.5% (Table 1). In Austria at the site Kundl, Candidatus N. mikurensis was detected in 4 of 10 questing larvae.
In Total, 1413 ticks were tested for A. phagocytophilum and 53 (3.8%) were positive. It was detected in all sampling sites, but one (Table 1). None of the tested larvae carried A. phagocytophilum.
GLMM analysis on the occurrence probability of CNM in questing ticks as a function of the proportion of ticks infected with AP and tick developmental stage
Proportion of ticks infected with AP
Tick developmental stage_adults
Tick developmental stage_nymphs
We have confirmed the permanent circulation of Candidatus N. mikurensis and A. phagocytophilum in each of the three examined countries of Central Europe across a wide ecological spectrum of habitats (Table 1). The highest prevalence of Candidatus N. mikurensis (23.5%) was observed in Austria. A similarly high prevalence (24.2-26.6%) was found for questing ticks from Germany . These are so far the highest prevalence results reported for Europe. Moreover, in Austria we have detected four positive questing larvae. Up to this date, the transovarial transmission has not been reported for Candidatus N. mikurensis. However, to our knowledge the questing larvae were examined for the pathogen only at one site in The Netherlands, by Jahfari et al. . As the mode of pathogen transmission by vectors is of high epidemiological significance , possible transovarial transmission of Candidatus N. mikurensis should be elucidated in future studies.
The reservoir competency of rodents for Candidatus N. mikurensis have been recently confirmed . As for A. phagocytophilum, it is unlikely that rodents are important reservoir hosts of the genotypes that are transmitted by I. ricinus. Based on the phylogenetic analyses of several genes, rodents in Europe are infected with distinct genotypes from that found in questing I. ricinus (, unpublished observation). Moreover, recent study showed that rodents infected with A. phagocytophilum were not able to transmit it to xenodiagnostic larvae . The reservoir competence of other hosts for Candidatus N. mikurensis needs to be elucidated, since it was detected in the ticks feeding on red deer, mouflon and wild boar .
We have revealed a positive association between the occurrences of Candidatus N. mikurensis and A. phagocytophilum. This finding indicates that both bacteria share similar ecology for their natural foci in Central Europe. This result has an important implication for public health, and patients with a history of tick bite should also be examined for the presence of Candidatus N. mikurensis since it is widespread throughout Central Europe in all regions where I. ricinus is present.
The study was partially supported by the grant VEGA - 2/0055/-11 and APVV-0267-10 and partially funded by EU grant FP7-261504 EDENext and is catalogued by the EDENext Steering Committee as EDENext214. The contents of this publication are the sole responsibility of the authors and don’t necessarily reflect the views of the European Commission. The authors thanks M. Stanko and B. Peťko for the tick collection in the Czech Republic, L. Vidlička for the help with the figure, R. Ivanová for excellent technical help and S. Barláková for reading the manuscript.
- Kawahara M, Rikihisa Y, Isogai E, Takahashi M, Misumi H, Suto C, Shibata S, Zhang C, Tsuji M: Ultrastructure and phylogenetic analysis of “Candidatus Neoehrlichia mikurensis” in the family Anaplasmataceae, isolated from wild rats and found in Ixodes ovatus ticks. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol. 2004, 54: 1837-1843. 10.1099/ijs.0.63260-0.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Schouls LM, Van De Pol I, Rijpkema SG, Schot CS: Detection and identification of Ehrlichia, Borrelia burgdorferi sensu lato, and Bartonella species in Dutch Ixodes ricinus ticks. J Clin Microbiol. 1999, 37: 2215-2222.PubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
- Andersson M, Råberg L: Wild rodents and novel human pathogen Candidatus Neoehrlichia mikurensis, Southern Sweden. Emerg Infect Dis. 2011, 17: 1716-1718. 10.3201/eid1709.101058.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Jahfari S, Fonville M, Hengeveld P, Reusken C, Scholte EJ, Takken W, Heyman P, Medlock J, Heylen D, Kleve J, Sprong H: Prevalence of Neoehrlichia mikurensis in ticks and rodents from North-west Europe. Parasit Vectors. 2012, 5: 74-10.1186/1756-3305-5-74.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Lommano E, Bertaiola L, Dupasquier C, Gern L: Infections and coinfections of questing Ixodes ricinus ticks by emerging zoonotic pathogens in Western Switzerland. Appl Environ Microbiol. 2012, 78: 4606-4612. 10.1128/AEM.07961-11.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Vayssier-Taussat M, Le Rhun D, Buffet JP, Maaoui N, Galan M, Guivier E, Charbonnel N, Cosson JF: Candidatus Neoehrlichia mikurensis in Bank Voles, France. Emerg Infect Dis. 2012, 18: 2063-2065. 10.3201/eid1812.120846.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Fehr JS, Bloemberg GV, Ritter C, Hombach M, Luscher TF, Weber R, Keller PM: Septicemia caused by tick-borne bacterial pathogen Candidatus Neoehrlichia mikurensis. Emerg Infect Dis. 2010, 16: 1127-1129. 10.3201/eid1607.091907.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Welinder-Olsson C, Kjellin E, Vaht K, Jacobsson S, Wenneras C: First case of human “Candidatus Neoehrlichia mikurensis” infection in a febrile patient with chronic lymphocytic leukemia. J Clin Microbiol. 2010, 48: 1956-1959. 10.1128/JCM.02423-09.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Pekova S, Vydra J, Kabickova H, Frankova S, Haugvociva R, Mazal O, Cmejla R, Hardekopf DW, Jancuskova T, Kozak T: Candidatus Neoehrlichia mikurensis infection identified in 2 hematooncologic patients: benefit of molecular techniques for rare pathogen detection. Diag Microbiol Infect Dis. 2011, 69: 266-270. 10.1016/j.diagmicrobio.2010.10.004.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Burri C, Schumann O, Schumann C, Gern L: Are Apodemus spp. Mice and Myodes glareolus reservoirs for Borrelia miyamotoi, Candidatus Neoehrlichia mikurensis, Rickettsia helvetica, R. monacensis and Anaplasma phagocytophilum?. Tick Tick Borne Dis. 2014, in pressGoogle Scholar
- Richter D, Matuschka FR: “Candidatus Neoehrlichia mikurensis”, Anaplasma phagocytophilum, and lyme disease spirochetes in questing european vector ticks and in feeding ticks removed from people. J Clin Microbiol. 2012, 50: 943-947. 10.1128/JCM.05802-11.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Hornok S, Meli ML, Gönczi E, Hofmann-Lehmann R: First evidence of Candidatus Neoehrlichia mikurensis in Hungary. Parasit Vectors. 2013, 6: 267-10.1186/1756-3305-6-267.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Glatz M, Müllegger RR, Maurer F, Fingerle V, Achermann Y, Wilske B, Bloemberg GV: Detection of Candidatus Neoehrlichia mikurensis, Borrelia burgdorferi sensu lato genospecies and Anaplasma phagocytophilum in a tick population from Austria. Ticks Tick Borne Dis. 2014, 5: 139-144. 10.1016/j.ttbdis.2013.10.006.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Courtney JW, Kostelnik LM, Zeidner NS, Massung RF: Multiplex real-time PCR for detection of Anaplasma phagocytophilum and Borrelia burgdorferi. J Clin Microbiol. 2004, 42: 3164-3168. 10.1128/JCM.42.7.3164-3168.2004.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Massung RF, Slater K, Owens JH, Nicholson WL, Mather TN, Solberg VB, Olson JG: Nested PCR assay for detection of granulocytic ehrlichiae. J Clin Microbiol. 1998, 36: 1090-1095.PubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
- Silaghi C, Woll D, Mahling M, Pfister K, Pfeffer M: Candidatus Neoehrlichia mikurensis in rodents in an area with sympatric existence of the hard ticks Ixodes ricinus and Dermacentor reticulatus, Germany. Parasit Vectors. 2012, 5: 285-10.1186/1756-3305-5-285.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Ewald PW: Vectors, vertical transmission, and the evolution of virulence. Evol Infect Dis. 1994, Oxford: Oxford University Press, 35-56.Google Scholar
- Bown KJ, Lambin X, Ogden NH, Begon M, Telford G, Woldehiwet Z, Birtles R: Delineating Anaplasma phagocytophilum ecotypes in coexisting, discrete enzootic cycles. Emerg Infect Dis. 2009, 15: 1948-1954. 10.3201/eid1512.090178.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly credited. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.