Open Access

Infection success of Echinoparyphium aconiatum (Trematoda) in its snail host under high temperature: role of host resistance

Parasites & Vectors20147:192

https://doi.org/10.1186/1756-3305-7-192

Received: 3 March 2014

Accepted: 14 April 2014

Published: 21 April 2014

Abstract

Background

Extreme weather events such as summer heat waves become more frequent owing to global climate change and are predicted to alter disease dynamics. This is because high temperatures can reduce host immune function. Predicting the impact of climate change on host-parasite interactions is, however, difficult as temperature may also affect parasite infective stages and other host characteristics determining the outcome of interaction.

Methods

Two experiments were conducted to investigate these phenomena in a Lymnaea stagnalis–Echinoparyphium aconiatum (Trematoda) interaction. In the first experiment, the effects of exposure of snails to experimental heat waves [maintenance at 25°C vs. 15°C (control)] with different durations (3 days, 7 days) on the infection success of parasite cercariae was examined. In the second experiment, the infection success was examined under similar conditions, while controlling for the possible temperature effects on cercariae and at least partly also for host physiological changes that take place rapidly compared to alterations in immune function (exposure to cercariae at intermediate 20°C).

Results

In the first experiment, increased infection success at 25°C was found independently of the duration of the heat wave. In the second experiment, increased infection success was found only in snails maintained at 25°C for 7 days, a treatment in which snail immune defence is known to be impaired.

Conclusions

These results suggest that the effects of host resistance in determining overall parasite infection success can be overridden by effects of temperature on parasite transmission stages and/or alterations in other host traits than immune defence.

Keywords

Echinoparyphium aconiatum Global climate change Heat wave Lymnaea stagnalis Resistance to infection Host-parasite interaction Experimental assessment

Background

The outcomes of host-parasite interactions and therefore disease dynamics are often affected by environmental conditions (see [1, 2] for review). Especially as ambient temperature can heavily influence these dynamics [3, 4]. Owing to anthropogenic climate change, understanding such effects is increasingly important as climate change leads to an increase in average air temperature and more frequent occurrence of extreme weather events such as summer heat waves [5, 6]. The effect of high temperature on host-parasite interactions is often assumed to take place via reduced resistance of hosts to infections due to impaired immune function [7, 8]. This is because immune defence is typically considered to be the main physiological barrier against parasites (see [9] for review).

Predicting the effects of temperature on host-parasite interactions based only on the knowledge on host immune defence can, however, be difficult. This is because parasite infection strategies as well as other host characteristics than immune function can be important in determining the outcome of interactions. For instance, temperature can directly affect parasite infective stages (e.g. survival, mobility) thus modifying their infection success [1013]. Similarly, in ectothermic species, temperature affects host metabolism and could modify their physiological traits (see [14] for review). For example, metabolic products, excreted into the environment by the organisms are used for host finding by some parasite species (see for review [1517]), and temperature could alter excretion of such chemical host cues. However, the role of the above effects is likely to be system specific [1820]. This could cause high variation in the effects of temperature across different host-parasite interactions complicating the predictions of the effects of climate change [21]. Hence, examining the infection success of parasites under high temperature and the role of altered host defences in determining this is in high demand.

This study focused on the effect of high ambient temperature on the infection success of Echinoparyphium aconiatum (syn. Pseudoechinoparyphium echinatum; Trematoda) cercariae in its snail host Lymnaea stagnalis. In this system, high temperature is known to reduce several immune defence traits of snails [22, 23], and thus snails can be assumed to become less resistant to infections during heat waves. This effect, however, is seen only when snails are maintained at high temperature for one week or longer [23]. The parasite Echinoparyphium aconiatum is one of the most common trematode species infecting L. stagnalis[2426]. It has a complex life-cycle including snails as first and second intermediate hosts, and snail-eating birds as a definitive host [27]. Cercariae released from the first intermediate host use chemical cues (e.g. amino acids) to find their second intermediate host from the environment [15, 18, 28], which they enter through the urinary orifice and develop into encysted metacercariae mostly in the hepatopancreas.

Here, the effects of experimental heat waves on the interaction between L. stagnalis and E. aconiatum cercariae were examined in two experiments. The first experiment investigated their effects on the overall parasite infection success. The second experiment, examined infection success by controlling for the possible temperature effects on cercariae and at least partly for host physiological changes that take place rapidly compared to alterations in immune function which are slow in this system [23]. As experimental temperatures of 15°C [a common temperature in habitats of snails (A. Laurila, 2010, unpublished data; U. Tobler, 2010, unpublished data)] and 25°C [a temperature that occurs intermittently in ponds during hot summers (A. Laurila, 2010, unpublished data; U. Tobler, 2010, unpublished data)] were used. As only long-term (one week or longer) maintenance at high temperature is known to impair immune function of snails [23] the effects of both short- (3 days) and long-term (7 days) heat waves were tested. We predict overall parasite infection success to increase (experiment 1) and host resistance to infection to decrease (experiment 2) after long-term maintenance of snails at high temperatures. If temperature affects parasite transmission stages and/or other host traits than immune defence we expect host resistance to be a poor predictor for parasite infection success.

Methods

Experimental animals

Experimental snails came from a laboratory stock population (F2 generation) originating from a pond in Zürich, Switzerland (47°22′N, 8°34′E). The population was maintained in water tanks (temperature ranging from 12°C to 20°C, but being close to 15°C for most of the year) for one year before the experiment. Five days prior to the experiment (see below), experimental snails (shell length: 27.6 - 42.6 mm) were randomly chosen from the population and placed individually in plastic cups filled with 200 ml of aged tap water at 15°C to acclimatize them to the experimental conditions. Snails were fed with spinach ad libitum, and water in the cups was changed every second day during this period and throughout the following experiments.

Snails releasing E. aconiatum cercariae for the experiment originated from ponds in Biengarten, Germany (49°39′N, 10°49′E). With using an allopatric parasite a coevolutionary history between the host and the parasite could be avoided. Snails collected from the field were brought to the laboratory and placed individually in plastic cups filled with 40 ml of water. Snails infected with E. aconiatum were identified by observing the morphology of released cercariae (see [25]). Infected snails were maintained in boxes, with 10 to 15 snails in each, filled with 6 l of aged tap water at 20°C (a typical temperature at the collection site at the time of sampling; own obs.) and fed with spinach ad libitum between collecting and use in the experiment.

Experimental design

The study was conducted in two experiments that ran simultaneously. The first experiment examined the overall effect of high temperature on the infection success of E. aconiatum in L. stagnalis. Experimental snails were maintained as described above and randomly assigned into one of the two temperature (15°C, 25°C) and maintenance time (3 days, 7 days) treatments (20 snails per treatment combination). Water in the cups was changed once more after the maintenance period and snails were exposed to parasite cercariae (see below) at their respective maintenance temperatures.

The second experiment examined the effect of high temperature on the resistance of snails to infection when controlling for the potential direct effects of temperature on parasite cercariae and partly also for host physiological changes that take place rapidly compared to alterations in immune function and could affect the outcome of interaction (see the Discussion for potential mechanisms). Experimental snails were maintained as in experiment 1. After the maintenance period, snails were removed from their cups and transferred into new cups filled with aged tap water at 20°C (temperature at which the snails producing cercariae were maintained). Immediately after the transfer, snails were exposed to E. aconiatum cercariae (see below).

After the maintenance period in experimental treatments (see above), snails were exposed to freshly emerged (5–30 min old) parasite cercariae. To gain cercariae, a total of 60 infected snails were transferred into cups filled with fresh water (i.e. no previously released cercariae) and emerged cercariae were collected under a microscope. In the parasite exposures, four to five different host snails were used to gain a total of 20 cercariae that were introduced into the cup of each experimental snail. Which experimental snail received parasites from which infected snails was determined by chance. Thus, each infected snail contributed equally to the mix of cercariae used for infections, and the genetic (i.e. clonal) composition of parasites varied among exposed snail individuals. The exposure dose of 20 cercariae per snail was used as it allows examining infection success as a quantitative trait [29, 30], and as parasite intensities in the wild commonly vary between 10 and 30 metacercariae per snail (own obs.). Snails were exposed to the parasites for 24 h. This exposure time is sufficient for the parasites to invade the snails and form metacercariae as they are only infective for approximately 24 h after emergence [31]. After that, snails were removed from the cups and their shell length was measured to the nearest 0.1 mm. Then, snails were removed from their shells and parasites that successfully infected the snails (i.e. encysted as metacercariae into snail tissues) were counted under a microscope.

Statistical analyses

Variation in parasite infection success was analysed using generalized linear models for both experiments. In these models, the proportion of parasites successfully infecting the snails (x/20) was used as a binomial response variable (logit link function), and maintenance temperature (15°C, 25°C) and maintenance time (3 days, 7 days) were used as fixed factors. Because of a significant interaction between the factors in the second experiment (see Results), the data were further analysed separately for different maintenance times to estimate the effect of maintenance temperature in detail. In these analyses, generalized linear models as above with maintenance temperature as a fixed factor were used. Size of snails is known to partly determine the infection success of E. aconiatum[29]. In this study, however, the shell length of the snails did not differ among treatment groups at the end of the experiment (Additional file 1). Furthermore, using shell length as a covariate in the above models led to significant interactions between factors and the covariate. Therefore, shell length was not included into the final models. All statistical analyses were performed using IBM SPSS Statistics Version 19.0 software (Armonk, NY: IBM Corp.).

Results

In the first experiment, the proportion of cercariae that successfully infected the snails was higher in individuals maintained and exposed to parasites at 25°C than in snails maintained and exposed at 15°C (Table 1, Figure 1). This effect was independent of maintenance time (Table 1, Figure 1).
Table 1

GLM for the proportion of E. aconiatum cercariae infecting L. stagnalis in the first experiment

 

Wald chi-square

df

p

Temperature (T)

16.921

1

<0.001

Maintenance time (D)

0.223

1

0.637

T × D

0.715

1

0.398

Figure 1

Infection success of E. aconiatum cercariae in the first experiment. Proportion of encysted metacercariae in snails maintained at different temperature treatments for three or seven days before parasite exposure (20 cercariae per snail, 11 to 20 snails per treatment group) when the snails were exposed to parasite cercariae at their respective maintenance temperature. Data are shown as box plot with median, 25th (lower box) and 75th (upper box) quartiles; whiskers represent the values within the 1.5 interquartile range (outliers are shown as ).

In the second experiment where the snails were exposed to parasites at 20°C, maintenance temperature of snails before parasite exposure did not have a significant main effect on parasite infection success (Table 2, Figure 2). Its effect, however, depended on maintenance time indicated by a significant interaction between the factors (Table 2). Therefore, the effect of maintenance temperature was analysed separately for different maintenance time treatments. In the long-term treatment, higher parasite infection success was found in snails maintained at 25°C than at 15°C (generalized linear model: Wald Chi-Square = 6.736, p = 0.009, Figure 2). In the short-term treatment, maintenance at 25°C before parasite exposure led to fewer infections than maintenance at 15°C (generalized linear model: Wald Chi-Square = 11.182, p = 0.001, Figure 2).
Table 2

GLM for the proportion of E. aconiatum cercariae infecting L. stagnalis in the second experiment

 

Wald chi-square

df

p

Maintenance temperature (T)

0.466

1

0.495

Maintenance time (D)

16.379

1

<0.001

T × D

17.778

1

<0.001

Figure 2

Infection success of E. aconiatum cercariae in the second experiment. Proportion of encysted metacercariae in snails maintained at different temperature treatments for three or seven days before parasite exposure (20 cercariae per snail, 11 to 20 snails per treatment group) when the snails were exposed to parasite cercariae at 20°C. Data are shown as box plot with median, 25th (lower box) and 75th (upper box) quartiles; whiskers represent the values within the 1.5 interquartile range (outliers are shown as ).

Discussion

In this paper, we show that exposure of L. stagnalis snails to high temperature increased the infection success of E. aconiatum cercariae. This, however, was not only due to decreased host resistance. In the first experiment where the snails were exposed to cercariae at their respective maintenance temperature, the proportion of parasites that successfully infected the snails was higher at 25°C compared to 15°C both in short- and long-term treatments. This indicates that other factors than the altered immune function (see [22, 23]) are important in determining infection success as immune function of L. stagnalis is known to be reduced only after seven days of exposure to high temperature (see [23]). In the second experiment where the resistance of snails against the infection was examined by controlling for the possible direct effects of temperature on parasite infective stages and partly for temperature-dependent changes in host metabolic and physiologic rate (i.e. exposure at 20°C), infection success was higher only when the snails were maintained at 25°C for seven days before parasite exposure. This indicates that the resistance of snails against E. aconiatum is affected by temperature, and confirms that other factors need to override its effect in determining the infection success of the parasite.

The observed effect of temperature on overall parasite infection success could take place via at least two different mechanisms that may override the effect of altered host resistance. First, temperature could directly affect parasite cercariae by altering their mobility, survival, and infectivity [10, 13, 31, 32]. For instance, an effect on the activity of cercariae can alter the contact probability between the parasite and the host leading to changed transmission efficiency [10, 13, 32]. Similarly, altered efficiency in the use of energy reserves can change infectivity of cercariae [10, 12]. Thus, an increase in the performance of parasites at high temperature may enable cercariae to overcome host defences more easily. Second, ambient temperature may also affect other host traits than immune function, which could alter the outcome of the interaction. For instance, echinostome cercariae are able to find snails from the environment using chemo-orientation by responding to the micromolecules excreted by the snails [15, 18, 28]. These responses depend on the total amount of such host cues and also on their chemical composition [15, 18, 28]. Thus, environmental factors that alter the metabolism and physiology of snails could modify the excretion of such molecules altering exposure to parasite transmission stages. For example, physiological effects of food processing are known to predispose snails to E. aconiatum cercariae [29]. Similarly, ambient temperature could change the amount and composition of such chemical cues in the environment by altering snail metabolism. The relative importance of changes in host cues in the environment compared to direct temperature effects on parasite larvae might be large as chemo-orientation allows direct movement towards the host [18]. However, the actual role of these potential mechanisms remains to be investigated.

Interestingly, in the first experiment, the combined effect of reduced resistance due to long-term maintenance at high temperature and possible direct effects of temperature on parasite transmission stages and/or differences in host physiology apart from immune defence did not lead to higher infection success compared to short-term exposures. It is possible that the maximum infection success of cercariae was already reached in both treatments as not all parasites may be able to infect the snails (e.g. due to intrinsic factors of the parasite such as mortality or infectivity). The highest observed infection success of approximately 60% is lower than what has been reported for this species earlier [29, 33]. The use of an allopatric host may have reduced the maximum infection success in this study (see [34] for review, [35]). Moreover, in the second experiment, the proportion of encysted parasites when the snails were maintained at high temperature for three days before parasite exposure was lower than when the snails were maintained at 15°C. This was unexpected as in our earlier study [23], none of the examined immune parameters (i.e. haemocyte concentration, phenoloxidase-like activity, and antibacterial activity of snail haemolymph) was altered by short-term maintenance at high temperature. It is important to note, however, that immune responses of snails to E. aconiatum are currently not well understood. Thus, it could be that some other immune traits that were not examined in our earlier study [23] determine the resistance of snails to this parasite species. Such parameters could respond differently to high temperature compared to the ones examined earlier [8], which could alter snail resistance already after short-term maintenance at high temperature. Potential candidates for such mechanisms are, for example, reactive oxygen species such as hydrogen peroxide [36] and lectins such as fibrinogen-related proteins (see [37] for review), which have been reported to be important in snail defences against trematodes in other species.

Conclusions

Exposure of snails to high temperature increased the infection success of E. aconiatum cercariae independently of the length of the experimental heat wave snails had experienced. However, when controlling for the effects of temperature on parasite transmission stages and potential temperature-dependent changes in host metabolism and physiology that may take place rapidly compared to changes in immune defence (e.g. excretion of chemical cues), only long-term maintenance at high temperature led to increased infection success. This suggests that such factors overrode the effects of temperature on host resistance in determining the infection success under high temperature. Our results suggest that heat waves can lead to higher parasite infection success and thus increase the probability of epidemics. However, environmental conditions can also influence at other stages of parasite life cycles. For example, the production and release of cercariae in the snail hosts is known to depend on environmental conditions in several parasite species [3840]. Additionally, environmental stress can cause high mortality among infected hosts [4143]. Since parasite population dynamics are determined by a balance between parasites within-host growth and reproduction, host and parasite mortality, and parasite transmission rate [44, 45], all of which may vary across host and parasite species, more studies focusing on different steps of parasite life cycles are needed to assess the overall effect of climate change on disease dynamics.

Declarations

Acknowledgements

We thank K. Liljeroos for practical help during the experiment, and B. Sadd and J. Jokela for commenting on the manuscript. We would also like to thank Prof. W. Haas for his help with collecting snails and identifying E. aconiatum infections. The study was funded by the Biological Interactions Doctoral Program (BIOINT) to KL, and the Emil Aaltonen Foundation and Swiss National Science Foundation (grant 31003A 140876) to OS.

Authors’ Affiliations

(1)
Eawag, Swiss Federal Institute of Aquatic Science and Technology
(2)
Department of Biological and Environmental Science, University of Jyväskylä
(3)
ETH Zürich, Institute of Integrative Biology (IBZ)

References

  1. Altizer S, Dobson A, Hosseini P, Hudson P, Pascual M, Rohani P: Seasonality and the dynamics of infectious diseases. Ecol Lett. 2006, 9: 467-484. 10.1111/j.1461-0248.2005.00879.x.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. Harvell CD, Mitchell CE, Ward JR, Altizer S, Dobson AP, Ostfeld RS, Samuel MD: Climate warming and disease risks for terrestrial and marine biota. Science. 2002, 296: 2158-2162. 10.1126/science.1063699.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. Poulin R, Mouritsen KN: Climate change, parasitism and the structure of intertidal ecosystems. J Helminthol. 2006, 80: 183-191. 10.1079/JOH2006341.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. Macnab V, Barber I: Some (worms) like it hot: fish parasites grow faster in warmer water, and alter host thermal preferences. Global Change Biol. 2012, 18: 1540-1548. 10.1111/j.1365-2486.2011.02595.x.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  5. Meehl GA, Tebaldi C: More intense, more frequent, and longer lasting heat waves in the 21st century. Science. 2004, 305: 994-997. 10.1126/science.1098704.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. Diffenbaugh NS, Pal JS, Trapp RJ, Giorgi F: Fine-scale processes regulate the response of extreme events to global climate change. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2005, 102: 15774-15778. 10.1073/pnas.0506042102.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. Roth O, Kurtz J, Reusch TBH: A summer heat wave decreases the immunocompetence of the mesograzer, Idotea baltica. Mar Biol. 2010, 157: 1605-1611. 10.1007/s00227-010-1433-5.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  8. Murdock CC, Paaijmans KP, Bell AS, King JG, Hillyer JF, Read AF, Thomas MB: Complex effects of temperature on mosquito immune function. Proc R Soc Lond Ser B Biol Sci. 2012, 279: 3357-3366. 10.1098/rspb.2012.0638.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  9. Janeway CA, Travers P, Walport M, Shlomchik MJ: Immunobiology: The Immune System in Health and Disease. 2005, New York: Garland Science PublishingGoogle Scholar
  10. Evans NA: The influence of environmental temperature upon transmission of the cercariae of Echinostoma liei (Digenea: Echinostomatidae). Parasitology. 1985, 90: 269-275. 10.1017/S0031182000050976.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  11. Fried B, Ponder EL: Effects of temperature on survival, infectivity and in vitro encystments of the cercariae of Echinostoma caproni. J Helminthol. 2003, 77: 235-238. 10.1079/JOH2003178.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. Morley NJ: Thermodynamics of cercarial survival and metabolism in a changing climate. Parasitology. 2011, 138: 1442-1452. 10.1017/S0031182011001272.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. Meyrowitsch D, Christensen NØ, Hindsbo O: Effects of temperature and host density on the snail-finding capacity of cercariae of Echinostoma caproni (Digenea: Echinostomatidae). Parasitology. 1991, 102: 391-395. 10.1017/S0031182000064350.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. Hofmann GE, Todgham AE: Living in the now: physiological mechanisms to tolerate a rapidly changing environment. Annu Rev Physiol. 2010, 72: 127-145. 10.1146/annurev-physiol-021909-135900.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. Haas W, Haberl B, Kalbe M, Körner M: Snail-host-finding by miracidia and cercariae: chemical host cues. Parasitol Today. 1995, 11: 468-472. 10.1016/0169-4758(95)80066-2.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  16. De Bruyn C, De Ridder C, Rigaud T, David B: Chemical host detection and differential attraction in a parasitic pea crab infecting two echinoids. J Exp Mar Biol Ecol. 2011, 397: 173-178. 10.1016/j.jembe.2010.12.005.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  17. Hallem EA, Dillman AR, Hong AV, Zhang Y, Yano JM, DeMarco SF, Sternberg PW: A sensory code for host seeking in parasitic nematodes. Curr Biol. 2011, 21: 377-383. 10.1016/j.cub.2011.01.048.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. Haas W, Körner M, Hutterer E, Wegner M, Haberl B: Finding and recognition of the snail intermediate hosts by 3 species of echinostome cercariae. Parasitology. 1995, 110: 133-142. 10.1017/S0031182000063897.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. Thomas JD, Eaton P: Amino acid medleys of snail origin as possible sources of information for conspecifics, schistosome miracidia and predators. Comp Biochem Physiol C Toxicol Pharmacol. 1993, 106: 781-796.Google Scholar
  20. Haas W, Stiegeler P, Keating A, Kullmann B, Rabenau H, Schönamsgruber E, Haberl B: Diplostomum spathaceum cercariae respond to a unique profile of cues during recognition of their fish host. Int J Parasitol. 2002, 32: 1145-1154. 10.1016/S0020-7519(02)00089-9.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. Harvell CD, Altizer S, Cattadori IM, Harrington L, Weil E: Climate change and wildlife diseases: when does the host matter the most?. Ecology. 2009, 90: 912-920. 10.1890/08-0616.1.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. Seppälä O, Jokela J: Immune defence under extreme ambient temperature. Biol Lett. 2011, 7: 119-122. 10.1098/rsbl.2010.0459.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. Leicht K, Jokela J, Seppälä O: An experimental heat wave changes immune defense and life history traits in a freshwater snail. Ecol Evol. 2013, 3: 4861-4871. 10.1002/ece3.874.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. Loy C, Haas W: Prevalence of cercariae from Lymnaea stagnalis snails in a pond system in Southern Germany. Parasitol Res. 2001, 87: 878-882. 10.1007/s004360100462.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  25. Faltýnková A, Našincová V, Kablásková L: Larval trematodes (Digenea) of the great pond snail, Lymnaea stagnalis (L.) (Gastropoda, Pulmonata), in Central Europe: A survey of species and key to their identification. Parasite. 2007, 14: 39-51. 10.1051/parasite/2007141039.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  26. Yurlova NI, Vodyanitskaya SN, Serbina EA, Biserkov VY, Georgiev BB, Chipev NH: Temporal variation in prevalence and abundance of metacercariae in the pulmonate snail Lymnaea stagnalis in Chany Lake, West Siberia, Russia: Long-term patterns and environmental covariates. J Parasitol. 2006, 92: 249-259. 10.1645/GE-544R2.1.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  27. Kanev I: Comparative studies on the morphology and biology of Echinostoma nudicaudatum Nasir, 1960, Cercaria deficipinnatum Khan, 1960 and Echinoparyphium aconiatum Dietz, 1909 Trematoda Echinostomatidae. Khelmintologiia. 1982, 4: 29-43.Google Scholar
  28. Körner M, Haas W: Chemo-orientation of echinostome cercariae towards their snail hosts: Amino acids signal a low host-specificity. Int J Parasitol. 1998, 28: 511-516. 10.1016/S0020-7519(97)00196-3.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  29. Seppälä O, Karvonen A, Haataja M, Kuosa M, Jokela J: Food makes you a target: disentangling genetic, physiological, and behavioral effects determining susceptibilty to infection. Evolution. 2011, 65: 1367-1375. 10.1111/j.1558-5646.2010.01205.x.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  30. Wiehn J, Kopp K, Rezzonico S, Karttunen S, Jokela J, Jarne P: Family-level covariation between parasite resistance and mating system in a hermaphroditic freshwater snail. Evolution. 2002, 56: 1454-1461. 10.1111/j.0014-3820.2002.tb01457.x.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  31. McCarthy AM: The influence of temperature on the survival and infectivity of the cercariae of Echinoparyphium recurvatum (Digenea: Echinostomatidae). Parasitology. 1999, 118: 383-388. 10.1017/S003118209900400X.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  32. Haas W: Physiological analyses of host-finding behaviour in trematode cercariae: adaptations for transmission success. Parasitology. 1994, 109: 15-29. 10.1017/S003118200008505X.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  33. McCarthy AM, Kanev I: Pseudechinoparyphium echinatum (Digenea: Echinostomatidae): experimental observations on cercarial specificity toward second intermediate hosts. Parasitology. 1990, 100: 423-428. 10.1017/S0031182000078719.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  34. Kaltz O, Shykoff JA: Local adaptation in host-parasite systems. Heredity. 1998, 81: 361-370. 10.1046/j.1365-2540.1998.00435.x.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  35. Landis SH, Kalbe M, Reusch TBH, Roth O: Consistent pattern of local adaptation during an experimental heat wave in a pipefish-trematode host-parasite system. PLoS One. 2012, 7: e30658-10.1371/journal.pone.0030658.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  36. Bayne CJ: Successful parasitism of vector snail Biomphalaria glabrata by the human blood fluke (trematode) Schistosoma mansoni: A 2009 assessment. Mol Biochem Parasitol. 2009, 165: 8-18. 10.1016/j.molbiopara.2009.01.005.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  37. Loker ES: Gastropod Immunobiology. Invertebrate Immunity. Volume 708. Edited by: Söderhäll K. 2010, Berlin, Germany: Landes Bioscience and Springer Science + Business Media, 17-43. Advances in Experimental Medicine and BiologyView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  38. Ataev GL: Temperature influence on the development and biology of rediae and cercariae of Philophthalmus rhionica (Trematoda). Parazitologiya. 1991, 25: 349-359.Google Scholar
  39. Morley NJ, Lewis JW: Thermodynamics of cercarial development and emergence in trematodes. Parasitology. 2013, 140: 1211-1224. 10.1017/S0031182012001783.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  40. Seppälä O, Liljeroos K, Karvonen A, Jokela J: Host condition as a constraint for parasite reproduction. Oikos. 2008, 117: 749-753. 10.1111/j.0030-1299.2008.16396.x.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  41. Wegner KM, Kalbe M, Milinski M, Reusch T: Mortality selection during the 2003 European heat wave in three-spined sticklebacks: Effects of parasites and MHC genotype. BMC Evol Biol. 2008, 8: 124-10.1186/1471-2148-8-124.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  42. Krist AC, Jokela J, Wiehn J, Lively CM: Effects of host condition on susceptibility to infection, parasite developmental rate, and parasite transmission in a snail–trematode interaction. J Evol Biol. 2004, 17: 33-40.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  43. Jokela J, Lively CM, Taskinen J, Peters AD: Effect of starvation on parasite-induced mortality in a freshwater snail (Potamopyrgus antipodarum). Oecologia. 1999, 119: 320-325. 10.1007/s004420050792.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  44. Anderson RM: The regulation of host population growth by parasitic species. Parasitology. 1978, 76: 119-157. 10.1017/S0031182000047739.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  45. Anderson RM, May RM: Regulation and stability of host-parasite population interactions: I. Regulatory processes. J Anim Ecol. 1978, 47: 219-247. 10.2307/3933.View ArticleGoogle Scholar

Copyright

© Leicht and Seppälä; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2014

This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly credited. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.

Comments

By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.

Advertisement