Skip to content


  • Short report
  • Open Access

Autochthonous Dirofilaria repens in Austria

  • 1Email author,
  • 1,
  • 1,
  • 1,
  • 2,
  • 3,
  • 3,
  • 3 and
  • 1
Parasites & Vectors20147:226

  • Received: 21 January 2014
  • Accepted: 7 May 2014
  • Published:



In Europe animal and human infections due to Dirofilaria repens are increasing.


In a nationwide screening for filarioid parasites in Austria, 7,632 mosquitoes were collected from June till October 2012 and divided into 437 pools according to same trapping date and sight and mosquito species. For the molecular detection, a real-time PCR approach was followed by conventional PCR. D. repens was detected in the villages Moerbisch and Rust, Burgenland in one Anopheles maculipennis group and one Anopheles algeriensis species pool, respectively.


The geographical distribution of the two positive pools points to the invasion of D. repens from Eastern neighboring countries. The finding of D. repens in mosquito vectors suggests the occurrence of the causative agent for cutaneous dirofilariosis in Austria.


  • Mosquito
  • Dirofilariosis
  • Anopheles maculipennis
  • Anopheles algeriensis


In the past few years a new emergence of filarioid diseases like dirofilariosis has been noted, particularly in Europe where the human infections due to Dirofilaria (D.) repens are increasing [1]. Although several Dirofilaria species are considered zoonotic, D. repens is the most common species causing human dirofilariosis in temperate areas [1, 2]. Therefore, infections with D. repens are of growing concern for veterinary and public health. In Germany, D. repens[3] and more recently D. immitis[4] has been detected inside their mosquito vectors. The higher the parasite prevalence in the mosquito host, the greater the risk of transmission to mammalian hosts [5]. High frequencies are reported in humans from regions with high prevalence of D. repens in animal hosts which are inhabited by zooanthropophilic (so-called bridge) vectors [6]. Of the 1,410 subcutaneous/ocular human dirofilariosis cases so far reported worldwide, 16 were described in Austria from 2000 – 2011 [1]. The first suspected autochthonous case of dirofilariosis in an Austrian patient without recent travel history was reported in 2008 [7]. In the following year D. repens positive blood samples were detected in dogs from the Eastern Austrian province Burgenland and the district of Gaenserndorf (Lower Austria). Simultaneous screening of mosquito pools from the same species and the same trapping area with real-time PCR (qPCR), however, did not detect D. repens in the vector [8]. Since humans are at risk of infection wherever canine dirofilariosis is present [5] a nationwide screening for mosquito-borne filarioid parasites was initiated. Until the year 2012, the autochthonous presence of this emerging filarioid disease in Austria was not confirmed since no D. repens was detected in their mosquito vectors. Here, the first autochthonous case of D. repens detected in Austrian mosquitoes is described, emphasizing the possible transmission to humans in areas by infected vectors.


Mosquitoes were collected using BG sentinel™ traps (Biogents AG, Regensburg, Germany) from June till October 2012 in a nationwide mosquito monitoring and surveillance program (Figure 1). After collection the mosquitoes were transported alive to the laboratory and stored at −80°C until species differentiation. Morphometric evaluation was performed microscopically and specimens from the same site, trapping date and species were pooled. The 7,632 collected mosquitoes were divided into 437 pools according to the species, trapping-site and trapping-date, with an average pool size of 17 individuals. One 3 mm Tungsten Carbide Bead (Qiagen, Hilden, Germany) was added to each mosquito pool; after homogenization in a TissueLyser II (Qiagen, Hilden, Germany), DNA extraction was performed with a DNA Isolation Kit for Cells and Tissues (Roche, Basel, Switzerland). For the molecular detection of Dirofilaria spp. a qPCR approach [9] was applied to screen the mosquito pools for filarioid DNA. The following primers and a fluorescent labelled probe were used. FILA-F (5’ TGG ATT AGT ACC CAG GTA ATC 3’) and FILA-R (5’ CCA AAG AAA AAT CTA AAG TCA GTC 3’) and probe FILA-P (5’ HEX AAC AAA ACT TTA CTC CCGA-BHQ1 3’). The qPCR positive pools were subsequently examined by conventional PCR [10] for sequencing and species discrimination. The PCR product was subjected to Illustra™ ExoStar™1-Step (GE Healthcare, Buckinghamshire, United Kingdom) for subsequent DNA-Sanger-Sequencing by Microsynth (Microsynth AG, Balgach, Switzerland). After alignment of the forward and reverse sequence, a consensus sequence was constructed and compared to GenBank® entries using BLAST (
Figure 1
Figure 1

Map of sampling locations and sites of D. repens detection. Trapping sites (◦) and site of D. repens positive pools () in Rust and Moerbisch.


Two pools tested positive in the qPCR assay and were subjected to conventional PCR for the amplification and subsequent sequencing of a 667-bp long fragment spanning the cytochrome oxidase subunit I (COI) gene. The first positive pool collected on September 13th, 2012 originated from the village of Moerbisch, Burgenland. All 18 individuals of the pool belonged to the Anopheles maculipennis (Meigen, 1880) group. The mosquitoes of the second positive pool were caught in the village of Rust, Burgenland on September 14th, 2012 and consisted of 14 individuals, all belonging to the Anopheles algeriensis (Theobald, 1903) species. Both samples revealed a 100% similarity to a D. repens entry in GenBank® (D. repens COI gene: JF461458.1).


The geographical distribution of the two positive pools points to the possible invasion of D. repens from Eastern neighboring countries (Figure 1). The locations of recent cases in humans [7] and dogs [8] overlap in districts close to Hungary [11]. The first Austrian patient – supposedly without any travel history – even worked as border patrol at the Austrian-Hungarian border, approximately 50 km from the positive trapping site at Rust. However, the presence of the nematode DNA does not provide full evidence of the autochthonous biological cycle in Austria and further investigations on the vectorial role of indigenous mosquitoes and their vector competence are needed. Up until now autochthonous occurrence of D. repens has never been shown for Austria. The finding of D. repens in mosquito vectors suggests the occurrence of the causative agent for cutaneous dirofilariosis in the Eastern region of Austria.

Authors’ information

Katja Silbermayr holds a PhD in veterinary medicine and currently works as postdoc at the Institute of Parasitology, Vetmeduni Vienna, Austria. She is a 3rd-year resident of the European Veterinary Parasitology College with a strong research focus on vector-borne- and parasitic-skin-diseases.



We wish to thank Mrs Walpurga Wille-Piazzai for technical support. This work was partly funded by a grant from Bayer Animal Health Austria and the Austrian Academia Jubilee Fund research grant (H-2611/2011).

Authors’ Affiliations

Institute of Parasitology, Department of Pathobiology, University of Veterinary Medicine Vienna, Veterinaerplatz 1, 1210 Vienna, Austria
Technical Office of Ecology and Landscape Assessment, Persenbeug, Austria
Austrian Agency for Health and Food Safety, Division of Public Health, Vienna, Austria


  1. Simón F, Siles-Lucas M, Morchón R, González-Miguel J, Mellado I, Carretón E, Montoya-Alonso JA: Human and animal dirofilariasis: the emergence of a zoonotic mosaic. Clin Microbiol Rev. 2012, 25: 507-544. 10.1128/CMR.00012-12.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. Bocková E, Rudolf I, Kočišová A, Betášová L, Venclíková K, Mendel J, Hubálek Z: Dirofilaria repens microfilariae in Aedes vexans mosquitoes in Slovakia. Parasitol Res. 2013, 112 (10): 3465-3470. 10.1007/s00436-013-3526-9.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. Czajka C, Becker N, Jöst H, Poppert S, Schmidt-Chanasit J, Krüger A, Tannich E: Stable transmission of Dirofilaria repens nematodes, Northern Germany. Emerg Infect Dis. 2014, in pressGoogle Scholar
  4. Kronefeld M, Kampen H, Sassnau R, Werner D: Molecular detection of Dirofilaria immitis. Dirofilaria repens and Setaria tundra in mosquitoes from Germany. Parasit Vectors. 2014, 7: 30-10.1186/1756-3305-7-30.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. Giangaspero A, Marangi M, Latrofa MS, Martinelli D, Traversa D, Otranto D, Genchi C: Evidences of increasing risk of dirofilarioses in Southern Italy. Parasitol Res. 2013, 112: 1357-1361. 10.1007/s00436-012-3206-1.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. Simón F, López-Belmonte J, Marcos-Atxutegi C, Morchón R, Martín-Pacho JR: What is happening outside North America regarding human dirofilariasis?. Vet Parasitol. 2005, 133: 181-189. 10.1016/j.vetpar.2005.03.033.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. Auer H, Susani M: The first autochthonous case of subcutaneous dirofilariosis in Austria. Wien Klin Wochenschr. 2008, 120: 104-106. 10.1007/s00508-008-1031-4.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. Duscher G, Feiler A, Wille-Piazzai W, Bakonyi T, Leschnik M, Miterpáková M, Kolodziejek J, Nowotny N, Joachim A: Detection of Dirofilaria in Austrian dogs. Berl Munch Tierarztl Wochenschr. 2009, 122: 199-203.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. Czajka C, Becker N, Poppert S, Jost H, Schmidt-Chanasit J, Kruger A: Molecular detection of Setaria tundra (nematoda: Filarioidea) and an unidentified filarial species in mosquitoes in Germany. Parasit Vectors. 2012, 5: 14-10.1186/1756-3305-5-14.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. Casiraghi M, Anderson TJ, Bandi C, Bazzocchi C, Genchi C: A phylogenetic analysis of filarial nematodes: comparison with the phylogeny of Wolbachia endosymbionts. Parasitology. 2001, 122 (1): 93-103. 10.1017/S0031182000007149.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. Szénási Z, Kovács AH, Pampiglione S, Fioravanti ML, Kucsera I, Tánczos B, Tiszlavicz L: Human dirofilariosis in Hungary: an emerging zoonosis in Central Europe. Wien Klin Wochenschr. 2008, 120: 96-102. 10.1007/s00508-008-0928-2.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar


© Silbermayr et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2014

This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly credited. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver ( applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.


By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate. Please note that comments may be removed without notice if they are flagged by another user or do not comply with our community guidelines.