Open Access

Sero-diagnostic evaluation of Toxoplasma gondii recombinant Rhoptry antigen 8 expressed in E. coli

  • Parthasarathy Sonaimuthu1,
  • Mun Yik Fong1,
  • Ramaswamy Kalyanasundaram2,
  • Rohela Mahmud1 and
  • Yee Ling Lau1Email author
Parasites & Vectors20147:297

https://doi.org/10.1186/1756-3305-7-297

Received: 23 March 2014

Accepted: 14 June 2014

Published: 1 July 2014

Abstract

Background

Toxoplasma gondii infects all warm-blooded animals, including humans. Early diagnosis and determining the infective stage are critical for effectively treating immunosuppressed individuals and pregnant women with toxoplasmosis. Among the rhoptry proteins of the parasite, Rhoptry protein 8 (ROP8), is known to be expressed during the early stages of T. gondii infection and is involved in parasitophorous vacuole formation. In this study, we have investigated the diagnostic efficacy of recombinant ROP8 (rROP8).

Methods

The ROP8 gene was cloned into pCOLD I DNA vector and expressed as a soluble recombinant antigen in Escherichia coli. Expressed ROP8 protein was evaluated using western blot method.

Results

Western blot analysis of purified rROP8 antigen using 200 T. gondii-infected human serum samples, as well as non-infected serum controls, allowed for the successful identification of toxoplasmosis-positives, yielding a 90% sensitivity and 94% specificity.

Conclusion

Our findings indicated that rROP8 antigen expressed in E. coli was able to detect toxoplasmosis in infected human serum with specificity and sensitivity suggesting that rROP8 antigen represents a valid diagnostic marker for toxoplasmosis.

Keywords

Toxoplasma gondii ROP8 Western blot Expression

Background

Toxoplasma gondii is an obligate intracellular parasite that infects about one third of the human population [13]. The incidence of T. gondii infection varies based on geographical location due to environmental conditions, cultural habits, and hygiene standards [2, 4, 5]. Although acute toxoplasmosis is typically asymptomatic in HIV/AIDS patients, chronic infection in immunocompromised individuals can lead to life threatening encephalitis [6, 7]. In addition, toxoplasmosis is known to cause severe complications in pregnant women, including miscarriage.

Commercially available serological kits for the diagnosis of toxoplasmosis are usually based on total antigens isolated from in vivo or in vitro cultured T. gondii. Notably, production of these antigens is expensive, and they commonly contain host cell-derived contaminants [810]. In addition, the use of live parasites during antigen preparation can lead to health risks. In order to overcome these limitations, recombinant DNA technology has been employed for the production of antigens [11, 12]. In fact, the use of this cost effective method allows for the purification of stage-specific T. gondii antigens, which can be used to differentiate acute and chronic infections [13]. In this regard, many antigenic genes from T. gondii have recently been cloned and expressed using various systems. Also, several reports have described the successful use of recombinant antigenic proteins to detect antibodies against T. gondii[8, 11, 1419]. These previous studies analyzed recombinant antigens both individually and in combination to increase diagnostic sensitivity.

Among the rhoptry antigens, rhoptry protein 2 (ROP2) family proteins have been extensively studied. Rhoptry protein 8 (ROP8), which is a member of the ROP2 family, is expressed in both tachyzoites and bradyzoites of T. gondii[20]. Rhoptry antigens are involved in host cell invasion as well as parasitophorous vacuole membrane (PVM) formation [21]. Therefore, several rhoptry antigens (ROP1, 2, 8, 16, and 18) have been tested as potential vaccine candidates. While ROP1 and ROP2 were evaluated with regard to serological detection of T. gondii-infected serum samples, ROP8 has not been assessed as a diagnostic candidate. Therefore, in the present study, we have expressed recombinant ROP8 (rROP8) and investigated its efficacy as a diagnostic marker for toxoplasmosis in humans.

Methods

Parasite

The tachyzoites of T. gondii were propagated using HFF cells that were cultured and maintained in complete DMEM medium (2 mM glutamine supplemented with 10% (v/v) FBS, 5 μg/ml streptomycin and 5 U/ml penicillin) at 37°C with 5% CO2. The parasites were egressed out of the host cells by passing through a 25 G needle and purified using a 3 μm pore size polycarbonate membrane filter. The tachyzoites were harvested by centrifuging at 300 g for 15 min and suspended in appropriate buffer prior to use.

Recombinant plasmid constructions

The genomic DNA of tachyzoites (RH strain) was isolated using TriZol reagents (Invitrogen, USA). The ROP8 gene (Genbank ID: AF011377) was amplified from the genomic DNA using gene specific primers (forward primer 5CCCAAGCTT AGCATGGAATTTTCTGTGTTACG 3’ and reverse primer 5 CGGAATTC TCATGCCGGTTCTCCATCAG 3’containing the Hind III and EcoR 1 restriction sites as italicized). The PCR product was purified and cloned into the pCOLD I DNA vector plasmid at the specified restriction site. The resulting recombinant construct was transformed into BL21 (DE3) E. coli expression host cells. Recombinant clones were screened and verified by DNA sequencing.

Expression of recombinant protein

A single colony of fresh transformant of the recombinant construct was inoculated in 5 ml of Luria Bertani (LB) broth with Ampicillin (100 mg/ml) and Chloramphenicol (34 mg/ml) and grown overnight at 37°C, with 250 rpm shaking. From the overnight culture, 0.1% of the inoculum was inoculated in 10 ml of LB and grown until an OD600 of 0.5 to 0.6 was reached. At this point the culture was maintained at 15°C for 30 min and IPTG was added to a final concentration of 1 mM. The culture was grown overnight at 15°C. The cells were harvested by centrifugation at 10,000 rpm for 10 min and subjected to protein purification.

Purification of recombinant protein ROP8

The histidine tagged recombinant protein was purified through native purification system (Invitrogen, USA) using nickel nitrilotriacetic acid (Ni-NTA) (Qiagen, USA). Briefly, the cell pellet was suspended in binding buffer and solubilized by sonication on ice using a high intensity pulse for 15 mins. The lysate was then separated by centrifugation at 10,000 rpm for 30 min and incubated with Ni-NTA resin for 3 h at room temperature. The resin was washed with binding buffer containing increasing concentrations of Immidazole (5, 10 and 15 mM) to remove all contaminating proteins. The recombinant protein was eluted at 200 mM immidazole concentration. The purity of the proteins was analysed by running a 12% SDS-PAGE. The concentration of the purified recombinant proteins was estimated by the Bradford method (Bio-Rad, USA) and stored at −80°C in aliquots till further use.

Western blot analysis of ROP8 recombinant protein

Proteins were separated according to their molecular weight using a 12% SDS-PAGE gel. The proteins on the gel were transferred to a polyvinylidene difluoride (PVDF) membrane (Bio-Rad, USA). The membrane was blocked with blocking agent (5% non-fat milk powder in TBS) and washed three times with TBS and TBS-T for 5 min. This was followed by incubation with primary antibody (1:250) in 2.5% blocking agent in TBS for 2 h at room temperature and subjected to washing. The membrane was then incubated with anti-Human IgG (1:2500) for 1 h with shaking, washed and incubated with SAAP (1:2500) for 1 h. Finally, the membrane was washed and the protein was detected using nitro blue tetrazolium/bromochloroindolyl phosphate (NBT/BCIP) as the substrate.

Analysis of ROP8 protein sensitivity and specificity

Purified rROP8 were evaluated in Western blot assays using serum samples from three groups of human toxoplasmosis cases. Group 1 consisted of patients with early acute toxoplasmosis (IgM positive, IgG negative; n = 25); Group 2, consisted of patients with acute toxoplasmosis (IgM positive, IgG positive; n = 30); Group 3, consisted of patients with chronic toxoplasmosis (IgM negative, IgG positive; n = 50) and Group 4, consisted of toxoplasmosis negative control healthy human serum samples (IgM negative, IgG negative; n = 100). These samples were obtained from the Diagnostic Laboratory at the Department of Parasitology, University of Malaya, and grouped based on Captia™ Toxoplasma gondii IgG and Toxoplasma gondii IgM kits (Trinity Biotech, Ireland). Specificity of the recombinant protein was also tested with sera of patients diagnosed as having different infections, namely, amoebiasis (2 samples), cysticercosis (4 samples), filariasis (3 samples), and toxocariasis (2 samples). After the western blot analysis, sensitivity and specificity of rROP8 protein was calculated and tabulated in Table 1. Sensitivity was calculated as (number of true positive results)/(number of true positive results + number of false-negative results), and specificity was calculated as (number of true negative results)/(number of true negative results + number of false-positive results).
Table 1

Summary of western blot results obtained from recombinant rhoptry protein 8 detected with human serum samples

Sample group

Number of human serum samples

Western blot

Positive

Negative

  

No.

%

No.

%

1 (early acute: IgG−, IgM+)

25

23

90

2

10

2 (acute: IgG+, IgM+)

30

23

92

3

8

3 (chronic: IgG+, IgM−)

50

41

82

9

18

4 (toxoplasmosis negative: IgG−, IgM−)

100

6

6

94

94

Other infections

     

Amoebiasis

2

0

0

2

100

Cysticercosis

4

0

0

4

100

Filariasis

3

0

0

3

100

Toxocariasis

2

0

0

2

100

Results

Cloning of the ROP8 gene into the pCOLD I DNA vector

The ROP8 gene (1728 bp) was amplified from tachyzoite genomic DNA and successfully cloned into the pCOLD I DNA vector. Positive colonies were confirmed by polymerase chain reaction (PCR) and sequencing using gene-specific primers. Sequencing results revealed 100% similarity with the previously published ROP8 gene sequence. Finally, the verified recombinant plasmid was transformed into the BL21 (DE3) expression host.

Expression and purification of rROP8

Expression of rROP8 protein was induced with 1 mM IPTG for 24 h. SDS-PAGE was subsequently performed to analyze the expressed rROP8, which appeared as an intense 67 kDa band that was absent from the negative control (vector only) (Figure 1A and 1B). The rROP8 protein was successfully purified under native conditions using Ni-NTA resin (Figure 2A). Purification of rROP8 was verified by western blot with both His tag-specific antibody (anti-His) and human serum from a Toxoplasma-infected patient (Figure 2B). In each case a 67 kDa band was observed, while nothing was detected in the vector control lane.
Figure 1

SDS-PAGE analysis of expression of rROP8 in pCOLD I DNA vector. (A) Coomassie brilliant blue stained, (B) Western blot probed with Toxoplasmosis -infected patient serum. Lane 1 is rROP8 protein, Lane 2 is vector control (pCOLD I DNA vector protein only). Arrow indicates the expression of rROP8 protein at approximately 67 kDa.

Figure 2

SDS analysis of purified rROP8 . (A) Coomassie brilliant blue stained, (B) Western blot probed with Toxoplasmosis patient serum. Lane 1 and 2 are rROP8 protein. Lane 3 is vector control (pCOLD I DNA vector protein). Arrow indicates the purified rROP8 protein at approximately 67 kDa.

Reactivity of human serum samples against rROP8 protein

Toxoplasma-infected human serum samples were used to evaluate the sensitivity and specificity of rROP8 as a diagnostic marker by western blot. For this analysis, recombinant protein was tested against three different infected serum groups: early acute (IgG, IgM+), acute (IgM+, IgG+), and chronic (IgG+, IgM). Non-infected human serum samples were employed as a negative control. In addition, rROP8 was tested against human sera corresponding to other non-Toxo parasitic infections, such as toxocariasis, filariasis, amoebiasis, and cysticercosis. We observed that rROP8 protein yielded the following sensitivities with regard to serological detection of T. gondii: 90% (23 of 25) for early acute, 92% (23 of 30) for acute, and 82% (41 of 50) for chronic infections (Table 1). Four positive results for each group are shown in (Figure 3). Considering the 100 toxoplasmosis-negative human serum samples, six samples were found to react with rROP8, yielding a specificity of 94% (6 of 100) (Table 1). None of the non-Toxo parasitic infection sera reacted with rROP8 protein.
Figure 3

Detection of rROP8 with patient sera infected by Toxoplasmosis. Each Western Blot strip of the purified rROP8 was tested with serum from each category. Four samples from each category are shown here. Lanes 1 to 4 represents results of group 1 serum samples (early acute IgG−, IgM+), lane 5 to 8 represents results of group 2 serum samples (acute: IgG+, IgM+), lane 9 to 12 represents results of group 3 serum samples (chronic: IgG+, IgM−), lanes 13 to 16 represents results of group 4 serum samples(toxoplasmosis negative: IgG−, IgM−) as a control group.

Discussion

In the present study, the ROP8 gene was successfully cloned into a bacterial expression vector (pCOLD I DNA), and rROP8 protein was expressed in BL21 (DE3) host cells. One-step metal affinity chromatography was subsequently performed to purify rROP8, producing a low amount of pure recombinant protein per liter of bacterial culture. Notably, rROP8 production was found to be less efficient than other antigens that we have previously expressed and purified in our laboratory. Nevertheless, we retrieved sufficient quantities of rROP8 for testing its value as a diagnostic marker.

We tested the reactivity of three distinct groups of toxoplasmosis-infected human sera (i.e., early acute, acute, and chronic phase samples) against rROP8 by western blot (Table 1). Importantly, we observed no rROP8 cross reactivity when analyzing sera from other parasitic infections (i.e., amoebiasis, cysticercosis, filariasis and toxocariasis). We found that purified rROP8 antigen showed high sensitivity and specificity for the diagnosis of toxoplasmosis. In fact, our western blot analysis revealed a specificity of 96% and sensitivity for detecting IgG of 90%. This sensitivity was slightly higher when compared to ROP1 antigen, which was recently investigated with regard to the detection and differentiation of acute and chronic phase toxoplasmosis [22]. In addition, Van Gelder (along with other groups) evaluated recombinant ROP2 expressed in E. coli, as a marker for detection of T. gondii-specific antibodies in sera and found that recombinant ROP2 antigen detected IgG in 89 out of 98 toxoplasmosis-positive samples. A similar study was performed by Martin, who observed a sensitivity of 91% when using E. coli-expressed ROP2 to detect toxoplasmosis-specific IgG in human serum samples [23].

The major finding of this study is that rROP8 antigen represents a valid diagnostic marker for detecting toxoplasmosis via western blot assay. Notably, the western blot method is thought to be better than enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA), especially considering that the likelihood of obtaining false positive results by western blot is much lower as compared to ELISA [24]. The superiority of the western blot assay over ELISA for screening human serum samples has also been confirmed in other studies. In fact, immunoblot was found to be more informative and less affected by sample degradation than ELISA, producing high confidence results that could be directly visualized [25]. Thus, given its high specificity and sensitivity, we have selected to use the western blot technique to evaluate the efficacy of rROP8 as a diagnostic marker for toxoplasmosis.

Our rROP8-related findings might be valuable for future development of diagnostic kits based on the immmunochromatographic test (ICT). The ICT represents the best serological assay for diagnosing infections, including toxoplasmosis compared to ELISA, although ELISA is more commonly used and considered to be simpler than other tests. Nevertheless, the ICT is more rapid, efficient, accurate, and low cost than ELISA [26]. In addition, ICT is advantageous because it can be used in the field (e.g., diagnosis of farm animals) [26].

One of the limitations of this study is failure to follow up with a repeat serology test on a second sample from the same patient to confirm the acute infection. By standard practice, early acute infection is confirmed by repeat sampling between 7–15 days and observing the IgG conversion [1]. Repeated sampling was not feasible in this study as patients were discharged immediately after treatment.

Conclusion

Our findings demonstrate that rROP8 produced in E. coli can be used as an antigen for the detection of toxoplasmosis-specific antibodies (IgG and IgM) by western blot assay. Thus, rROP8 represents a valid diagnostic marker for differentiating between the distinct stages of toxoplasmosis infection. In fact, the rROP8 based detection method yielded a 90% sensitivity and 94% specificity. Thus, rROP8 may represent a useful candidate antigen for the development of a novel ICT assay to detect toxoplasmosis. Furthermore, the ROP8 gene could be considered for future toxoplasmosis vaccine development.

Declarations

Acknowledgments

We thank the Diagnostic Laboratory (Para: SEAD), Department of Parasitology, University of Malaya and University Malaya Medical Centre (UMMC) for providing human serum samples.

Financial support: This work was supported by the University of Malaya IPPP grant (PS194/2009C) and UM High Impact Research Grand UM-MOHE (UM.C/625/1/HIR/MOHE/MED/16 and UM.C/625/1/HIR/MOHE/MED/18) from the Ministry of Higher Education, Malaysia.

Authors’ Affiliations

(1)
Department of Parasitology, Faculty of Medicine, University of Malaya
(2)
Department of Biomedical Sciences, College of Medicine, University of Illinois

References

  1. Singh S: Mother-to-child transmission and diagnosis of Toxoplasma gondii infection during pregnancy. Indian J Med Microbiol. 2003, 21: 69-76.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. Hill D, Dubey JP: Toxoplasma gondii: transmission, diagnosis and prevention. Clin Microbiol Infec. 2002, 8: 634-640.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  3. Montoya JG, Liesenfeld O: Toxoplasmosis. Lancet. 2004, 363: 1965-1976.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. Rorman E, Zamir CS, Rilkis I, Ben-David H: Congenital toxoplasmosis–prenatal aspects of Toxoplasma gondii infection. Reprod Toxicol. 2006, 21: 458-472.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. Pinard JA, Leslie NS, Irvine PJ: Maternal serologic screening for toxoplasmosis. J Midwifery Womens Health. 2003, 48: 308-316.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. Cingolani A, De Luca A, Ammassari A, Murri R, Linzalone A, Grillo R, Giancola ML, Antinori A: Detection of T.gondii-DNA by PCR in AIDS-related toxoplasmic encephalitis. J Euk Microbiol. 1996, 43: 118S-119S.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. Wong SY, Remington JS: Biology of Toxoplasma gondii. Aids. 1993, 7: 299-316.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. Aubert D, Maine GT, Villena I, Hunt JC, Howard L, Sheu M, Brojanac S, Chovan LE, Nowlan SF, Pinon JM: Recombinant antigens to detect Toxoplasma gondii-specific immunoglobulin G and immunoglobulin M in human sera by enzyme immunoassay. J Clin Microbiol. 2000, 38: 1144-1150.PubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. Beghetto E, Spadoni A, Bruno L, Buffolano W, Gargano N: Chimeric antigens of Toxoplasma gondii: toward standardization of toxoplasmosis serodiagnosis using recombinant products. J Clin Microbiol. 2006, 44: 2133-2140.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. Golkar M, Azadmanesh K, Khalili G, Khoshkholgh-Sima B, Babaie J, Mercier C, Brenier-Pinchart MP, Fricker-Hidalgo H, Pelloux H, Cesbron-Delauw MF: Serodiagnosis of recently acquired Toxoplasma gondii infection in pregnant women using enzyme-linked immunosorbent assays with a recombinant dense granule GRA6 protein. Diagn Micr Infec Dis. 2008, 61: 31-39.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  11. Pfrepper KI, Enders G, Gohl M, Krczal D, Hlobil H, Wassenberg D, Soutschek E: Seroreactivity to and avidity for recombinant antigens in toxoplasmosis. Clin Diagn Lab Immunol. 2005, 12: 977-982.PubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. Fisher HG, Stachelhaus S, Sahm M, Meyer HE, Reichman G: GRA7, an excretory 29 kDa Toxoplasma gondii dense granule antigen released by infected host cells. Mol Biochem Parasit. 1998, 91: 251-261.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  13. Jacobs D, Vercammen M, Saman E: Evaluation of recombinant dense granule antigen 7 (GRA7) of Toxoplasma gondii for detection of immunoglobulin G antibodies and analysis of a major antigenic domain. Clin Diagn Lab Immunol. 1999, 6: 24-29.PubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. Altcheh J, Diaz NS, Pepe CM, Martin V, Nigro M, Freilij H, Angel SO: Kinetic analysis of the humoral immune response against 3 Toxoplasma gondii-recombinant proteins in infants with suspected congenital toxoplasmosis. Diagn Micr Infec Dis. 2006, 56: 161-165.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  15. Beghetto E, Buffolano W, Spadoni A, Del Pezzo M, Di Cristina M, Minenkova O, Petersen E, Felici F, Gargano N: Use of an immunoglobulin G avidity assay based on recombinant antigens for diagnosis of primary Toxoplasma gondii infection during pregnancy. J Clin Microbiol. 2003, 41: 5414-5418.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. Li S, Maine G, Suzuki Y, Araujo FG, Galvan G, Remington JS, Parmley S: Serodiagnosis of recently acquired Toxoplasma gondii infection with a recombinant antigen. J Clin Microbiol. 2000, 38: 179-184.PubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. Marcolino PT, Silva DA, Leser PG, Camargo ME, Mineo JR: Molecular markers in acute and chronic phases of human toxoplasmosis: determination of immunoglobulin G avidity by Western blotting. Clin Diagn Lab Immunol. 2000, 7: 384-389.PubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. Nigro M, Gutierrez A, Hoffer AM, Clemente M, Kaufer F, Carral L, Martin V, Guarnera EA, Angel SO: Evaluation of Toxoplasma gondii recombinant proteins for the diagnosis of recently acquired toxoplasmosis by an immunoglobulin G analysis. Diagn Micr Infec Dis. 2003, 47: 609-613.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  19. Pietkiewicz H, Hiszczynska-Sawicka E, Kur J, Petersen E, Nielsen HV, Stankiewicz M, Andrzejewska I, Myjak P: Usefulness of Toxoplasma gondii-specific recombinant antigens in serodiagnosis of human toxoplasmosis. J Clin Microbiol. 2004, 42: 1779-1781.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. Bhopale GM: Development of a vaccine for toxoplasmosis: current status. Microb Infect. 2003, 5: 457-462.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  21. Beckers CJ, Dubremetz JF, Mercereau-Puijalon O, Joiner KA: The Toxoplasma gondii rhoptry protein ROP 2 is inserted into the parasitophorous vacuole membrane, surrounding the intracellular parasite, and is exposed to the host cell cytoplasm. J Cell Biol. 1994, 127: 947-961.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. Holec-Gasior L, Kur J, Hiszczynska-Sawicka E: GRA2 and ROP1 recombinant antigens as potential markers for detection of Toxoplasma gondii-specific immunoglobulin G in humans with acute toxoplasmosis. Clin Vaccine Immunol. 2009, 16: 510-514.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. Martin V, Arcavi M, Santillan G, Amendoeira MR, De Souza Neves E, Griemberg G, Guarnera E, Garberi JC, Angel SO: Detection of human Toxoplasma-specific immunoglobulins A, M, and G with a recombinant Toxoplasma gondii rop2 protein. Clin Diagn Lab Immunol. 1998, 5: 627-631.PubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. Nockler K, Reckinger S, Broglia A, Mayer-Scholl A, Bahn P: Evaluation of a Western Blot and ELISA for the detection of anti-Trichinella-IgG in pig sera. Vet Parasitol. 2009, 163: 341-347.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  25. Anderson T, DeJardin A, Howe DK, Dubey JP, Michalski ML: Neospora caninum antibodies detected in Midwestern white-tailed deer (Odocoileus virginianus) by Western blot and ELISA. Vet Parasitol. 2007, 145: 152-155.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  26. Huang X, Xuan X, Hirata H, Yokoyama N, Xu L, Suzuki N, Igarashi I: Rapid immunochromatographic test using recombinant SAG2 for detection of antibodies against Toxoplasma gondii in cats. J Clin Microbiol. 2004, 42: 351-353.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright

© Sonaimuthu et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2014

This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly credited. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.

Comments

By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.

Advertisement