Open Access

Vaccination with recombinant Brugia malayi cystatin proteins alters worm migration, homing and final niche selection following a subcutaneous challenge of Mongolian gerbils (Meriones unguiculatus) with B. malayi infective larvae

  • Sridhar Arumugam1,
  • Bin Zhan2,
  • David Abraham3,
  • Danielle Ward1,
  • Sara Lustigman4 and
  • Thomas R Klei1Email author
Parasites & Vectors20147:43

https://doi.org/10.1186/1756-3305-7-43

Received: 20 November 2013

Accepted: 8 January 2014

Published: 22 January 2014

Abstract

Background

Cysteine protease inhibitors of Brugia malayi have been ascribed to be involved in parasite development as well as to immunomodulate the host’s immune response. In Onchocerca volvulus, Onchocystatin has been shown to induce partial protection in the mouse diffusion chamber vaccination model. In the present study we investigated the impact of vaccination with recombinant Bm-CPI-1 and Bm-CPI-2 proteins on protection against a subcutaneous challenge of B. malayi third stage larvae in gerbils.

Findings

Vaccination with E. coli derived recombinant B. malayi cysteine protease inhibitors (Bm-CPI-1 or -2) did not confer protection against B. malayi L3 challenge infection in gerbils but altered the homing of a significant number of adult worms from the lymphatics to the heart and lungs.

Conclusion

Bm-CPI vaccination-induced alteration in worm migration is consistent with our previous observations in gerbils vaccinated with B. pahangi excretory-secretory (ES) proteins, which resulted in delayed migration of the L3s and altered the final location of adult worms. Similar observations have also been made in dogs vaccinated with Ancylostoma caninum proteins; an increased number of worms were recovered in the colon and not the expected small intestine. A change in the final niche was also reported in immune versus non-immune hosts of two other gut dwelling nematodes. Vaccination induced alteration of the parasite’s final homing might be a rare or a common phenomenon, which unfortunately is rarely recorded. The reason for the alteration in the final niche selection by adult nematode worms following vaccination is unknown and necessitates further investigation.

Keywords

Brugia malayiCysteine protease inhibitorsFilariasisVaccinationWorm migrationImmunomodulation

Findings

Background

An array of filarial vaccine candidates have been tested in various rodent models including the Brugia malayi Mongolian gerbil system. These have been reviewed recently by Morris et al. [1]. Vaccination with B. malayi irradiated L3 larvae conferred the highest level of protection (56 to 91%) against subcutaneous (SC) or intraperitoneal (IP) L3 challenge [1]. Apart from irradiated L3 larvae, soluble extracts of microfilariae (MF) and adult worms and some recombinant protein antigens conferred significant protection against L3 challenged rodent animal models. The B. malayi abundant larval transcript I (Bm-ALTI) showed the highest levels of protection of 76% [1]. However, so far no vaccine based strategy has demonstrated complete protection against a challenge infection in any permissive animal model. This is likely due to the complexity of filarial infections and the ability of filarial parasites to modulate the immune system to increase their longevity in the mammalian host [2, 3]. B. malayi, filarial infection in humans is characterized by an antigen-specific unresponsiveness in the peripheral T cell populations of chronically infected patients [4, 5]. Filarial parasite secreted proteins can dampen the host immune response and immunopathology may occur from a dysregulated response to infection [3]. Excretory-secretory (ES) proteins of filarial nematodes play a major role in pathogenesis, immunodiagnosis of helminth infections and host immune regulation [6, 7]. The major set of proteins secreted by filarial nematodes includes proteases, protease inhibitors, venom allergen homologues, glycolytic enzymes and lectins [8, 9].

Cystatins or cysteine protease inhibitors (CPIs) have been described across the animal and plant kingdoms. The role of CPIs in parasitic nematodes has been attributed to essential developmental processes and to specific interactions with the parasite’s vector and/or mammalian hosts [10, 11]. In B. malayi, three cysteine protease inhibitors have been characterized; these are Bm-CPI-1, Bm-CPI-2 and Bm-CPI-3 [10, 12, 13]. Bm-CPI-2 has been found in ES products and is expressed in all life stages of B. malayi. Bm-CPI-2 acts as an immunomodulator by blocking the activity of mammalian proteases including the antigen-processing enzyme asparaginyl endopeptidase, whereas Bm-CPI-1 and -3 are expressed in L2 and L3 stages and have been described to have functions in the mosquito vector necessary for transmission of the parasite [10, 13]. The amino acid sequences identified between Bm-CPI-1 and Bm-CPI-2 is 28% and the sequence alignment is shown in Additional file 1: Figure S1.

In O. volvulus, a cysteine protease inhibitor, onchocystatin (Ov7; Ov-CPI-2) was described by Lustigman et al. [14]. The recombinant onchocystatin administered with alum as an adjuvant was able to induce 49% reduction in worms in an L3 challenge within diffusion chambers [15, 16]. Moreover, the levels of anti-Ov-CPI-IgG3 cytophilic antibodies were elevated in the putatively immune (PI) and significantly increased with age in infected individuals implicating a potential role of Ov-CPI-2 in the protective immunity in humans [17]. In the Litomosoides sigmodontis-mouse model, L. sigmodontis cysteine protease inhibitor-2 (Ls-CPI-2) acts as an immunomodulator and DNA vaccination with mutated Ls-CPI-2 along with mutated L. sigmodontis abundant larval transcript-1 (Ls-ALT-1) conferred significant protection against an L3 challenge leading to reduced adult worm burden and a reduction in peripheral microfilaremia [18, 19]. In the current study, we measured the effect of vaccination with recombinant Bm-CPI-1 or Bm-CPI-2 on protective immunity to B. malayi infection in gerbils following a SC challenge of L3. Our results showed that vaccination with Bm-CPI-1 and Bm-CPI-2 when formulated in alum did not confer protection against B. malayi infection in Mongolian gerbils. However, it affected the final niche where the adult worms resided. Significantly more worms were found in the heart and lungs and fewer worms were found in the lymphatics of both Bm-CPI-1 and Bm-CPI-2 vaccinated animals in comparison to the adjuvant controls. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first report to demonstrate that vaccination with recombinant filarial proteins affects filarial parasite adult worm migration and selection of their final niche.

Methods

Expression of recombinant Bm-CPI-1 and Bm-CPI-2

DNAs encoding for the Bm-CPI-1 (GenBank accession # AF177192) and Bm-CPI-2 (GenBank accession #AF015263) plus a 6-histidine-tag at C-terminus were synthesized by GenScript (Piscataway, NJ) and subsequently subcloned in-frame into the E. coli expression vector pET41a (Novagen). The recombinant plasmids were transformed into BL21 (DE3) (Novagen) and recombinant proteins were induced with 0.5 mM IPTG and purified with Ni-column as described [20]. Putative endotoxin, LPS, was removed from the recombinant proteins using ToxinEraser endotoxin removal kit following the manufacturer’s protocol (GenScript, Piscataway, NJ).

Animals, vaccination and challenge with L3s

Eight week old male Mongolian gerbils (Meriones unguiculatus) purchased from Charles River Laboratories (Wilmington, MA) were maintained on standard rodent chow and water ad libitum. The Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee (IACUC) at Louisiana State University (LSU) approved the animal experimental protocols. B. malayi L3s were recovered from infected Aedes aegypti mosquitoes using the previously described Baermann technique [21]. For vaccine challenge experiments, 100 B. malayi L3s in 0.5 ml of RPMI were injected subcutaneously into the inguinal region of the left leg.

For proper formulation with alum, the complete binding of Bm-CPI-1 and Bm-CPI-2 to alum (Rehydragel LV, General Chemical, NJ) was tested. Briefly, 2.5 μg of either recombinant Bm-CPI-1 or Bm-CPI-2 was mixed with 32 μg of alum for 30 min at room temperature with shaking, centrifuged at 2000 rpm for 5 min and then the supernatant was run on a 12% SDS-PAGE gel. There were no bands observed (Additional file 2: Figure S2), suggesting that both recombinant proteins efficiently bind to alum using this protein:adjuvant ratio.

Recombinant Bm-CPI-1 or Bm-CPI-2 was formulated with alum using the same ratio for vaccination of gerbils undergoing the intramuscular (IM) route of immunization. The following groups of male gerbils (N = 10; 8 week old) were vaccinated with: 1) 25 μg of Bm-CPI-1 absorbed to 320 μg of alum in TBS; 2) 25 μg of Bm-CPI-2 absorbed to 320 μg of alum in TBS; 3) 320 μg of alum in TBS. The first vaccination (V1) was followed by two boosters at two week intervals (V2, V3). Pre-immune serum was collected 1 week before the start of each experiment and designated as PI and 1 week after V3; designated Post-V3. Two weeks after the third vaccination, each gerbil was challenged with 100 L3s of B. malayi subcutaneously (SC) in the medial surface of the left leg.

Necropsy of all gerbils was performed 43 days post-challenge. Right and left popliteal lymph nodes, right and left renal lymph nodes, ilio-lumbar vessels, right and left spermatic cord lymphatics, right and left sub-inguinal and iliac lymph nodes, and right and left testes were gently teased in PBS under a stereomicroscope. In addition, the peritoneal cavity was washed with 1× PBS. The viscera and the carcass were soaked for 1 hour in 1× PBS. Later the heart and lungs were gently teased in 1× PBS. Following teasing, all tissues were left to soak for 1 hour to allow worms to emerge. The worms were recovered, counted, and then stored in 70% ethanol and 30% glycerin for observation if needed. For the purposes of discussion, we refer to worms collected from all lymphatic organs, testis and spermatic cords, as worms in the lymphatics, and worms collected from the heart and lungs as worms in heart & lungs.

Measuring IgG response against Bm-CPI-1 and Bm-CPI-2 by ELISA

To detect gerbil-specific IgG responses we raised polyclonal anti-gerbil IgG antibodies in rabbits. Briefly, total gerbil serum proteins were extracted by ammonium sulfate precipitation followed by the purification of the total IgG using the Pierce protein G IgG plus orientation kit and the manufacturer’s instructions (Thermo Scientific, IL). Polyclonal anti-sera against gerbil IgG in rabbits was raised under a contract with Pacific Immunology, CA. The gerbil IgG specific antibody response induced by vaccination with recombinant Bm-CPI-1 or Bm-CPI-2 was measured using the Rabbit Serum Antibody detection ELISA kit (Alpha Diagnostic, San Antonio, TX). Briefly, each well of a 96 well microplate was coated at 4°C overnight with 100 μl of 1 μg/ml of the antigen (recombinant Bm-CPI-1 or Bm-CPI-2) in coating buffer. The plates were washed 3 times with 200 μl of 1× wash buffer, blocked with 200 μl of blocking solution at room temperature for 4 hrs, then after an additional 3 washes incubated for 2 hrs at room temperature with serial dilutions of the gerbil sera collected during the course of vaccination with either Bm-CPI-1, Bm-CPI-2 or alum alone. Following incubation of sera, the plates were washed 3 times with wash buffer and incubated with 100 μl of 1:5000 dilution of the rabbit anti-gerbil IgG for 1 hr. The plates were then washed 3 times with wash buffer and incubated with 100 μl of 1:5000 dilution of HRP-conjugated anti-rabbit IgG for 30 minutes followed by an additional 4 washes and the addition of 100 μl of TMB substrate for 15 minutes at room temperature. The reaction was stopped by adding 100 μl of stop solution (H2SO4) and the microplate was read at 450 nm using an ELISA reader (Molecular Devices, Sunnyvale, CA).

To check if sera from the Bm-CPI-1 vaccinated gerbils cross-reacted with the Bm-CPI-2 protein, we analysed Bm-CPI-2 coated plates with sera from Bm-CPI-1 vaccinated gerbils. Likewise Bm-CPI-1 coated plates were tested with sera from Bm-CPI-2 vaccinated gerbils.

Statistics

Differences in worm recovery were analysed by the unpaired t test using GraphPad Prism version 4.03 for Windows (GraphPad Software, San Diego, California). Significance was when P ≤ 0.05.

Results

Vaccination with recombinant Bm-CPI-1 and Bm-CPI-2 did not confer protection against B. malayi infection but altered the final niche selection by the adult worms.

Mongolian gerbils were vaccinated IM three times with recombinant Bm-CPI-1 or Bm-CPI-2 in alum before they were challenged with 100 B. malayi L3s SC. Forty-three days post-infection, the gerbils were euthanized and necropsy was performed; adult B. malayi worms were recovered from different tissues of gerbils and counted. Neither vaccination with recombinant Bm-CPI-1 nor Bm-CPI-2 resulted in significant protection against B. malayi infection compared to the adjuvant control group (Figure 1A). However, there was a difference in the tissue distribution of adult worms between the antigen vaccinated groups and the adjuvant control group. More worms were found in the heart and lungs and fewer worms were found in the lymphatic organs of gerbils vaccinated with recombinant Bm-CPI-1 and Bm-CPI-2 (Figure 1B and C). The percentages of worms in the heart and lungs of Bm-CPI-1 and Bm-CPI-2 vaccinated groups were 66% and 69% respectively, and the percentage of worms in the lymphatics of Bm-CPI-1 and Bm-CPI-2 vaccinated groups was 34% and 31%, respectively. The percentage of worms in the heart and lungs or the lymphatics in the alum control gerbils was 29% and 71%, respectively.
Figure 1

Vaccination with recombinant Bm-CPI-1 and Bm-CPI-2 does not confer protection against B . malayi infection in Mongolian gerbils but affects migration of worms and habitat selection. A) Total worm count. B) Distribution of worms in heart and lungs. C) Distribution of worms in lymphatic organs. Statistical significance was determined by unpaired t test using GraphPad Prism version 4.03, * denotes a significant difference between vaccinated group and alum adjuvant control, P ≤ 0.05. The line represents the median value.

Gerbil IgG response to Bm-CPI-1 and Bm-CPI-2 vaccination

The end point dilution of antigen specific IgG responses induced after three vaccinations were measured by ELISA. High end point dilution of antigen specific IgG responses (up to 1:2,048,000) were detected in serum from gerbils vaccinated with Bm-CPI-1, whereas no Bm-CPI-1 specific IgG was observed in pre-immune and alum control serum. Antigen specific IgG end point dilution of up to 1:512,000 was detected in serum from gerbils vaccinated with Bm-CPI-2. When the cross-reactivity between the antibody responses was analysed, an end point dilution of 1:512, 000 was detected when Bm-CPI-1 was tested with serum from gerbils vaccinated with Bm-CPI-2. Similarly, an end point dilution of 1:2,048, 000 was found when Bm-CPI-2 coated plates were tested with serum from gerbils vaccinated with Bm-CPI-1. The Bm-CPI-1 antibody end point dilution was slightly higher than the Bm-CPI-2.

Discussion

Many investigators have reported protection in rodent-Brugia models against L3 infection with a large number of different recombinant B. malayi proteins [1]. However, there are no previous vaccination experiments reported that tested the efficacy of Bm-CPI-1 or Bm-CPI-2 in this model. Many studies also implicated the potential role of antibody-mediated killing of L3 as an effector mechanism [1]. While in our present study vaccination induced a significant antigen-specific IgG antibody response against Bm-CPI-1 and Bm-CPI-2, no protection against SC L3 infection was observed. It is important to note that unlike most other reported B. malayi-gerbil vaccination experiments, the challenge of L3s was administered SC, which is a more similar and natural route of infection in the human host. It also necessitates significant tissue migration by L3s and L4s in the host and final niche selection by the adult worms [22]. Migration and homing does not happen following an IP challenge or by using L3s implanted in diffusion chambers. These have been the most common routes of challenges used in the majority of the B. malayi-gerbil vaccination experiments reported. The current observations suggest that using our particular immunization regimens with both Bm-CPIs were not sufficient to block the establishment and development of B. malayi L3s in this model. It is possible that the appropriate protective immune responses were not generated by this vaccination.

Notably, although vaccination with Bm-CPI-1 and Bm-CPI-2 was not protective against B. malayi infection, it resulted in alteration of B. malayi larval migration and the final selection of the habitat where the adult worms resided. In the current experiment, the distribution of worms in the heart and lungs and in the lymphatics was shifted in such a way that more worms were recovered in the heart and lungs than in the lymphatics in comparison to alum control gerbils. The percentages of worms in the heart and lungs of Bm-CPI-1 and Bm-CPI-2 vaccinated groups was 66% and 69% respectively, and the percentage of worms in the lymphatics of Bm-CPI-1 and Bm-CPI-2 vaccinated groups was 34% and 31% respectively. The percentage of worms in the heart and lungs and in the lymphatics of alum control gerbils was 29% and 71% respectively. This is the first time out of 20 other experiments performed in our laboratory using 10 other recombinant proteins that such an outcome was observed. Over 20 experiments, the average percentage of worms recovered from the heart and lungs of alum control groups and the antigen-vaccinated groups was 42 and 44%, respectively. In comparison, the average percentage of worms recovered from the lymphatics and lymph nodes of alum control groups and antigen-vaccinated groups was 58 and 56%, respectively (Unpublished data). The recombinant B. malayi proteins used in these experiments are homologs of O. volvulus proteins reviewed elsewhere [23]. These proteins are E. coli expressed Bm-ALT-1 (B. malayi abundant larval transcript-1), Pichia expressed Bm-ALT-1, E. coli expressed Bm-ALT-2, E. coli expressed Bm-FAR-1 (B. malayi fatty acid retinol binding protein), Pichia expressed Bm-FAR-1, E. coli expressed Bm-FAR-2, E. coli expressed Bm-103 (B. malayi cDNA clone 103), Pichia expressed Bm-103, E. coli expressed Bm-RAL-2 (B. malayi novel protein reactive against larvae antiserum-2) and Pichia expressed Bm-RAL-2. The efficacy of these proteins in inducing a protective immunity will be discussed in subsequent publications.

The reasons for this altered migration and final location of the developed adult worms are not clear. Nor is the reason that this is only seen following vaccination with Bm-CPIs and not other recombinant proteins. Interestingly, in previous studies using the B. pahangi-gerbil model, we found that L3s induce an early acute inflammatory response that is modulated once the parasites are established in the lymphatics [24]. Bm-CPI-2 is a secreted protein and was shown to be immunomodulatory [13]. It is possible that the native Bm-CPI-2 secreted by L3s could reduce this initial acute inflammatory response against L3s and thus support the final residence of the worms in the lymphatics of control animals. However, as the vaccination with Bm-CPI-1 and/or CPI-2 induced a strong antibody-mediated response, it is possible that these strong responses have blocked the function of the native Bm-CPI-2 in the immunized gerbils. Moreover, as antibodies to Bm-CPI-1 and -2 proteins cross-react with each other it is possible that vaccinations with Bm-CPI-1 have resulted in similar outcomes. As a result, a non-modulated inflammatory response in this instance may not have been able to kill L3s, but rather created an unfavourable environment for the larvae in the lymphatics which altered their behaviour shunting them and subsequent stages away from the lymphatics to the heart and lungs. Our current findings are closely related to those of a recently reported study in the B. pahangi-gerbil model where vaccination of gerbils with B. pahangi ES secreted during the first 24 hours of culture slowed the early migration of the L3 challenge and subsequently also affected the worm’s migration from the lymphatics on the right side of the host to those on the left side [25]. Altered homing of adult parasites following vaccination has also been reported in dogs after vaccination with recombinant Ancylostoma caninum tissue inhibitor of metalloprotease (Ac-TMP) compared to dogs vaccinated with alum alone. The vaccination with recombinant proteins resulted in the reduction of the number of adult hookworms recovered from the small intestine and a concomitant increase in the number of adult hookworms recovered from the colon [26]. The effects of host immunity on parasite behavior have been reviewed by Damian RT [27]. The migration of Schistosoma mansoni and Nippostrongylus brasiliensis in mice like that of B. pahangi in gerbils was much reduced in the immune hosts. Similar to the report on A. caninum, the migration of larvae and adult worms of N. dubius and the adult worms of Trichostrongylus colubriformis in guinea pigs were significantly altered in the immune hosts.

Notably, the literature of vaccination experiments using filarial parasite-rodent models have so far and understandably focused on analyzing the reduction in worm burden in vaccinated groups. Many if not most of these experiments utilized IP or diffusion chamber L3 challenges. Following an IP challenge, most worms do not leave the peritoneal cavity and have no need to migrate to find an appropriate habitat for development. Most of the other experiments using the SC route of challenge did not report on adult worm location at necropsy. We present data here which demonstrates the effect of vaccination with recombinant protein and presumably the resulting immune response on the filarial worm’s migration and their final selection of habitat. Alterations of a parasite’s final niche after vaccination may be a rare phenomenon or a common phenomenon that is rarely reported. However, this can only be demonstrated in animal models using permissive hosts and challenge systems that allow for more natural migratory patterns. The reason for alteration in the migratory pattern of Brugia adult worms following vaccination is unclear. While speculative, Damian [27] suggested several possible explanations as to why this may occur which include: immune or inflammatory factors present in immune animals blocking normal chemoreceptors, the disruption of chemotactic gradients, or the modification of the local environment. All of these may explain in part our observations, however, why we observed this only following vaccination with Bm-CPIs and not with other filarial vaccine candidates is perplexing. Clearly the understanding of this phenomenon necessitates further investigation.

Conclusion

Vaccination with recombinant Bm-CPI-1 and Bm-CPI-2 in alum induced a significant antibody response to both proteins and antibodies to these proteins cross-reacted with each other. However, vaccination did not protect gerbils against B. malayi infection in terms of worm reduction. Vaccination did alter the worm distribution resulting in a decrease of adult worms in lymphatic tissues and a significant increase in worm migration to the heart and lungs. The reasons for the alteration in migration and establishment of worms in Bm-CPI-1 and Bm-CPI-2 vaccinated gerbils are unknown. Beside the main focus on reduction in worm burden in vaccination experiments in the filarial parasites-animal model described so far in literature, we have recognized a unique and rarely reported phenomenon on the effect of vaccination on filarial worm migration and habitat selection.

Abbreviations

Bm-CPIs: 

Brugia malayi cysteine protease inhibitors

ES: 

Excretory-secretory products

SC: 

Subcutaneous

IP: 

Intraperitoneal

IM: 

Intramuscular

MF: 

Microfilariae.

Declarations

Acknowledgements

This study received financial support from the US National Institutes of Health (NIH), AI078314-01. We thank Ms. Julie Woody for help in the insectary and Ms. Sharon Coleman for help with gerbil necropsy.

Authors’ Affiliations

(1)
Department of Pathobiological Sciences, LSU School of Veterinary Medicine, Louisiana State University
(2)
Department of Pediatrics and Tropical Medicine, Baylor College of Medicine, Texas Children Hospital
(3)
Department of Microbiology and Immunology, Kimmel Cancer Center, Thomas Jefferson University
(4)
Laboratory of Molecular Parasitology, Lindsley F. Kimball Research Institute, New York Blood Center

References

  1. Morris CP, Evans H, Larsen S, Mitre E: A comprehensive, model-based review of vaccine and repeat infection trials for filariasis. Clin Microbiol Rev. 2013, 26 (3): 381-421. 10.1128/CMR.00002-13.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. Maizels RM, Yazdanbakhsh M: Regulation of the immune response by helminth parasites: cellular and molecular mechanisms. Nat Rev Immunol. 2003, 3: 733-743. 10.1038/nri1183.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. Maizels RM, Balic A, Gomez-Escobar N, Nair M, Taylor M, Allen JE: Helminth parasites: masters of regulation. Immunol Rev. 2004, 201: 89-116. 10.1111/j.0105-2896.2004.00191.x.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. Sartono E, Kruize YCM, Kurniawan-Atmadja A, Maizels RM, Yazdanbakhsh M: Depression of antigen-specific interleukin-5 and interferon-g responses in human lymphatic filariasis as a function of clinical status and age. J Infect Dis. 1997, 175: 1276-1280. 10.1086/593701.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. Babu S, Blauvelt CP, Kumaraswami V, Nutman TB: Regulatory networks induced by live parasites impair both Th1 and Th2 pathways in patent lymphatic filariasis: implications for parasite persistence. J Immunol. 2006, 176: 3248-3256.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. Kaushal NA, Hussain R, Nash TE, Ottesen E: Identification and characterization of excretory-secretory products of Brugia malayi, adult filarial parasites. J Immunol. 1982, 129: 338-343.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. Hewitson JP, Grainger JR, Maizels RM: Helminth immunoregulation: the role of parasite secreted proteins in modulating host immunity. Mol Biochem Parasitol. 2009, 167 (1): 1-11. 10.1016/j.molbiopara.2009.04.008.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. Hewitson JP, Harcus YM, Curwen RS, Dowle AA, Atmadja AK, Ashton PD, Wilson A, Maizels RM: The secretome of the filarial parasite, Brugia malayi: proteomic profile of adult excretory-secretory products. Mol Biochem Parasitol. 2008, 160 (1): 8-21. 10.1016/j.molbiopara.2008.02.007.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. Bennuru S, Semnani R, Meng Z, Ribeiro JM, Veenstra TD, Nutman TB: Brugia malayi excreted/secreted proteins at the host/parasite interface: stage- and gender-specific proteomic profiling. PLoS Negl Trop Dis. 2009, 3 (4): e410-10.1371/journal.pntd.0000410.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. Gregory WF, Maizels RM: Cystatins from filarial parasites: evolution, adaptation and function in the host-parasite relationship. Int J Biochem Cell Biol. 2008, 40 (6–7): 1389-1398.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. de Macedo Soares MF, de Macedo MS: Modulation of anaphylaxis by helminth-derived products in animal models. Curr Allergy Asthma Rep. 2007, 7 (1): 56-61. 10.1007/s11882-007-0031-1.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. Murray J, Manoury B, Balic A, Watts C, Maizels RM: Bm-CPI-2, a cystatin from Brugia malayi nematode parasites, differs from Caenorhabditis elegans cystatins in a specific site mediating inhibition of the antigen-processing enzyme AEP. Mol Biochem Parasitol. 2005, 139 (2): 197-203. 10.1016/j.molbiopara.2004.11.008.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. Manoury B, Gregory WF, Maizels RM, Watts C: Bm-CPI-2, a cystatin homolog secreted by the filarial parasite Brugia malayi, inhibits class II MHC-restricted antigen processing. Curr Biol. 2001, 11 (6): 447-451. 10.1016/S0960-9822(01)00118-X.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. Lustigman S, Brotman B, Huima T, Prince AM, McKerrow JH: Molecular cloning and characterization of onchocystatin, a cysteine proteinase inhibitor of Onchocerca volvulus. J Biol Chem. 1992, 267 (24): 17339-17346.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. Abraham D, Leon O, Leon S, Lustigman S: Development of a recombinant antigen vaccine against infection with the filarial worm Onchocerca volvulus. Infect Immun. 2001, 69 (1): 262-270. 10.1128/IAI.69.1.262-270.2001.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. Lustigman S, James ER, Tawe W, Abraham D: Towards a recombinant antigen vaccine against Onchocerca volvulus. Trends Parasitol. 2002, 18 (3): 135-141. 10.1016/S1471-4922(01)02211-5.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. Cho-Ngwa F, Liu J, Lustigman S: The Onchocerca volvulus cysteine proteinase inhibitor, Ov-CPI-2, is a target of protective antibody response that increases with age. PLoS Negl Trop Dis. 2010, 4 (8): e800-10.1371/journal.pntd.0000800.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. Pfaff AW, Schulz-Key H, Soboslay PT, Taylor DW, MacLennan K, Hoffmann WH: Litomosoides sigmodontis cystatin acts as an immunomodulator during experimental filariasis. Int J Parasitol. 2002, 32 (2): 171-178. 10.1016/S0020-7519(01)00350-2.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. Babayan SA, Luo H, Gray N, Taylor DW, Allen JE: Deletion of parasite immune modulatory sequences combined with immune activating signals enhances vaccine mediated protection against filarial nematodes. PLoS Negl Trop Dis. 2012, 6 (12): e1968-10.1371/journal.pntd.0001968.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. Zhan B, Hotez JP, Wang Y, Hawdon MJ: A developmentally regulated metalloprotease secreted by host-stimulated Ancylostoma caninum third-stage infective larvae is a member of the astacin family of protease. Mol Biochem Parasitol. 2002, 120: 291-296. 10.1016/S0166-6851(01)00453-4.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. Klei TR, McVay CS, Dennis VA, Coleman SU, Enright FM, Casey HW: Brugia pahangi: Effects of duration of infection and parasite burden on lymphatic lesion severity, granulomatous hypersensitivity, and immune responses in jirds (Meriones unguiculatus). Exp Parasitol. 1990, 71: 393-405. 10.1016/0014-4894(90)90065-K.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. Chirgwin SR, Coleman S, Porthouse KH, Klei TR: Tissue migration capability of larval and adult Brugia pahangi. J Parasitol. 2006, 92 (1): 46-51. 10.1645/GE-599R.1.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. Lustigman S: Current approaches to the development of a vaccine against filarial nematodes, in immunity to parasitic infection. Edited by: Lamb TJ. 2012, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd: Chichester, UK, 459-470. Chapter 28: doi: 10.1002/9781118393321.ch28View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  24. Porthouse KH, Chirgwin SR, Coleman S, Taylor HW, Klei T: Inflammatory responses to migrating Brugia pahangi third-stage larvae. Infect Immun. 2006, 74: 2366-2372. 10.1128/IAI.74.4.2366-2372.2006.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  25. Zipperer GR, Arumugam S, Chirgwin SR, Coleman SU, Shakya KP, Klei TR: Brugia pahangi: Immunization with early L3 ES alters parasite migration, fecundity and lymphatic lesion formation in gerbils (Meriones unguiculatus). Exp Parasitol. 2013, 135 (2): 446-455. 10.1016/j.exppara.2013.08.007.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  26. Hotez PJ, Ashcom J, Bin Z, Bethony J, Williamson A, Hawdon JM, Jianjun F, Dobardzic A, Rizo I, Bolden J, Jin Q, Yan W, Dobardzic R, Chung-Debose S, Crowell M, Datu B, Delaney A, Dragonovski D, Jiang Y, Yueyuan L, Ghosh K, Loukas A, Brandt W, Russell PK, Zook BC: Effect of vaccinations with recombinant fusion proteins on Ancylostoma caninum habitat selection in the canine intestine. J Parasitol. 2002, 88 (4): 684-690.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  27. Damian RT: The influence of host immune responses on parasite behavior. Cues that influence behavior of internal parasites. Edited by: Bailey WS. 1982, Agricultural Research Service (Southern Region), U.S: Department of Agriculture, 149-165.Google Scholar

Copyright

© Arumugam et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2014

This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.

Comments

By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.

Advertisement