Open Access

Susceptibility to deltamethrin of wild and domestic populations of Triatoma infestans of the Gran Chaco and the Inter-Andean Valleys of Bolivia

  • Marinely Bustamante Gomez1,
  • Grasielle Caldas Pessoa D'Avila1,
  • Ana Lineth Garcia Orellana2,
  • Mirko Rojas Cortez3,
  • Aline Cristine Luiz Rosa1,
  • François Noireau4 and
  • Liléia Gonçalves Diotaiuti1Email author
Parasites & Vectors20147:497

https://doi.org/10.1186/s13071-014-0497-3

Received: 9 June 2014

Accepted: 21 October 2014

Published: 14 November 2014

Abstract

Background

The persistence of Triatoma infestans and the continuous transmission of Trypanosoma cruzi in the Inter-Andean Valleys and in the Gran Chaco of Bolivia are of great significance. Coincidentally, it is in these regions the reach of the vector control strategies is limited, and reports of T. infestans resistance to insecticides, including in wild populations, have been issued. This study aims to characterize the susceptibility to deltamethrin of wild and domestic populations of T. infestans from Bolivia, in order to better understand the extent of this relevant problem.

Methods

Susceptibility to deltamethrin was assessed in nine, wild and domestic, populations of T. infestans from the Gran Chaco and the Inter-Andean Valleys of Bolivia. Serial dilutions of deltamethrin in acetone (0.2 μL) were topically applied in first instar nymphs (F1, five days old, fasting, weight 1.2 ± 0.2 mg). Dose response results were analyzed with PROBIT version 2, determining the lethal doses, slope and resistance ratios (RR). Qualitative tests were also performed.

Results

Three wild T. infestans dark morph samples of Chaco from the Santa Cruz Department were susceptible to deltamethrin with RR50 of <2, and 100% mortality to the diagnostic dose (DD); however, two domestic populations from the same region were less susceptible than the susceptibility reference lineage (RR50 of 4.21 and 5.04 respectively and 93% DD). The domestic population of Villa Montes from the Chaco of the Tarija Department presented high levels of resistance (RR50 of 129.12 and 0% DD). Moreover, the domestic populations from the Valleys of the Cochabamba Department presented resistance (RR50 of 8.49 and 62% DD), the wild populations were less susceptible than SRL and T. infestans dark morph populations (RR50 < 5).

Conclusion

The elimination of T. infestans with pyrethroid insecticides in Brazil, Uruguay, Chile, and its drastic reduction in large parts of Paraguay and Argentina, clearly indicates that pyrethroid resistance was very uncommon in non-Andean regions. The pyrethroid susceptibility of non-Andean T. infestans dark morph population, and the resistance towards it, of Andean T. infestans wild and domestic populations, indicates that the Andean populations from Bolivia are less susceptible.

Keywords

Triatoma infestansControlBoliviaInsecticide resistanceDeltamethrin

Background

Triatoma infestans (Hemiptera, Reduviidae) is the main vector of Trypanosoma cruzi (Trypanosomatidae), pathogenic agent of Chagas disease in the countries of the Southern Cone of Latin America [1],[2]. Traditionally, the vector control programs focus on the interruption of transmission cycles using insecticides with residual action, especially pyrethroids [2]. Triatominae control strategies were originally based on ecoepidemiological characteristics of the group, such as their slow reproduction and vulnerability to chemical control, and aimed to eliminate T. infestans, despite the fact that this species has restricted wild foci [3]. Thereby in the last decades, Uruguay, Chile and Brazil were certified as free of transmission of T. cruzi by T. infestans[4],[5].

However, in the Gran Chaco in Argentina, Bolivia and Paraguay and in some areas of the Inter-Andean Valleys of Bolivia, despite the constant efforts to control T. infestans the success of these actions was limited and thus the species still persists [6],[7]. In addition to this important problem, in the last few years, wild foci of T. infestans have been described, mainly in the Inter-Andean Valleys and in the Gran Chaco [8],[9]. This fact was also observed in Argentina, Paraguay and Chile, showing that wild T. infestans have dispersed more widely than expected [10]-[14]. In Bolivia, the epidemiological significance of wild foci of T. infestans has been stressed [10].

The process of reinfestation of houses treated with insecticides is a serious phenomenon, and it is occurring quickly in the Gran Chaco [6],[15]-[17]. It is considered that vector control failures, are due to high levels of insecticide resistance in this area [18]-[21]. In the last few years, more studies demonstrated that the phenomenon of resistance to insecticides in domestic T. infestans populations presents an extensive distribution in southern Bolivia and northern Argentina [21]-[23], with high resistance ratios, and different toxicological profiles [14],[18],[19],[24]-[26]. Recently, susceptibility and resistance to deltamethrin and fipronil were detected in wild populations of T. infestans from Bolivia [14],[27].

Coincidence or not, it is in those regions that the reach of the vector control strategies is limited, and insecticide resistance in T. infestans populations has been reported, including wild populations [14],[27]-[29]. Thus, this study proposes to characterize the susceptibility to deltamethrin of wild and domestic T. infestans from the Gran Chaco and Inter-Andean Valleys in Bolivia, in order to understand better the extent of this relevant problem.

Methods

Populations of T. infestans

Nine populations of T. infestans five wild (S) and four domestic (D) were collected in the period from 2010 to 2011, in the region of Gran Chaco and Inter-Andean Valleys in Bolivia.

Wild T. infestans were captured using traps described by Noireau et al.[30],[31]. In the Gran Chaco, they were captured in hollow tree trunks, whereas in the Inter-Andean Valleys in rock outcrops.

The collection of the domestic T. infestans, both in the Inter-Andean Valleys and in the Gran Chaco, was performed through active searches in intradomicile and peridomicile, with assistance of technicians from the National Chagas Disease Control Program of Bolivia (NCHDCP) (Table 1).
Table 1

Samples of wild (S) and domestic (D) populations of Triatoma infestans , geographical origin, capture site (ecotope), morphs and cytogenetic classification

Site of collection

Department/Province

Latitude/longitude

Altitude meters

Capture site Ecotope

Morphsa

Cytotypeb

CIPEIN [SRL]

Susceptible reference strain

-

-

-

-

-

San Silvestre - S

Santa Cruz de la Sierra/Cordillera

19°21'21"S/62°34'10"W

400

Tree trunk

Dark morph

Non-andean

Terra Plem -S

Santa Cruz de la Sierra/Cordillera

19° 09'27"S/62°38'8"W

400

Tree trunk

Dark morph

Non-andean

Tita Chaco - S

Santa Cruz de la Sierra/Cordillera

18°55'39"S/62°34'28"W

400

Tree trunk

Dark morph

Non-andean

Mataral - S

Cochabamba/Aiquile

18°36'06"S/65°07'20"W

1,700

Rock outcrop

Mataral morph

Andean

Cotapachi - S

Cochabamba/Quillacollo

17°25'29"S/66°15'56"W

2,556

Rock outcrop

Common morph

Andean

Mataral - D

Cochabamba/Aiquile

18°35'44"S/65°08'58"W

1,750

Domestic (intra and peridomicile)

Common morph

Andean

Tamachindi - D

Santa Cruz de la Sierra/Cordillera

19°28'41"S/19°28'41"W

410

Domestic (intra and peridomicile)

Common morph

Non-andean

Rancho Nuevo -D

Santa Cruz de la Sierra/Cordillera

19°26'22"S/62°34'05"W

410

Domestic (intra and peridomicile)

Common morph

Non-andean

Villa Montes - D

Tarija/Gran Chaco

21°09'02"S/63°21'56"W

463

Domestic (peridomicile)

Common morph

Intermediate

aMorphs classification according to Noireau et al. [32], Cortez et al. [33].

bCytotypes classification according to Panzera et al. [34].

All insects collected were identified using the taxonomic key of Lent and Wygodzinsky [35] and maintained under controlled conditions of temperature and humidity (25°C ±1°C; 60% ±10% RH). They were fed weekly with chicken blood (Gallus gallus), ethical approval Comissão de Ética no Uso de Animais (PROTOCOL No 41/14-2).

Insecticide

Deltamethrin (pyrethroid) technical grade (S) - cyano-3-pehoxybenzyl (1R) -cis-3- (2,2-dibromovinyl) -2,2-dimethylcyclopropane Carboxylate, (99.6% - Bayer®, Brazil) was used.

Bioassays

The susceptibility reference lineage (SRL) of T. infestans came from Centro de Investigaciones de Plagas e Insecticidas (CIPEIN) [36], preserved in the laboratory for more than 30 years, without contact with insecticide and inclusion of external material was used.

Serial dilutions of deltamethrin in acetone were prepared. For each concentration, three repetitions were carried out with ten first instar nymphs of F1 generation (five days old, fasting, weight of 1.2 ± 0.2 mg). The treatment consisted of the application of 0.2 μL of insecticide dilution on the dorsal abdomen, according to the World Health Organization- WHO [37] and Pessoa [38] procedures, with the aid of a Hamilton micro-syringe mounted on a repeating dispenser. For each population, a minimum of eight doses of insecticide active ingredient (a.i.) ranging from 0.42 to 300 ng and killing between >0% to <100% of the individuals, were applied per insect. Acetone was applied to the control group. The mortality was assessed 72 hours after application and it was determined by the inability or lack of coordination of the nymphs to move from the center to the edge of the filter paper (7 cm diameter). Signs of paralysis and lack of response to external stimuli was considered as well. During and after the experiment, the insects were kept under controlled conditions of temperature and humidity (25°C ±1°C; 60% ±10% RH).

Diagnostic dose

The diagnostic dose (DD) applied was twice the minimum concentration of the insecticide that causes 99% of mortality in the susceptible laboratory strain [21],[39]. According to the World Health Organization [39], when mortality is <80% the tested population is considered resistant, and if >98% it is considered as susceptible. The LD99 to deltamethrin of the SRL was determined (5.50 ng (a.i.) per insect) and with it the DD was estimated.

Data analysis

Data from dose - response tests from each population were analyzed using the PROBIT program version 2 [40]. The slope and the lethal doses required to kill 50% of treated individuals (LD50) were estimated, as well as the Resistance Ratio (RR50), which was calculated by dividing each field population LD50 by the SRL LD50 value.

Results

Wild populations

From the five wild populations studied, the ones collected at the San Silvestre, Terra Plem and Tita Chaco communities (Chaco region) were identified as T. infestans dark morph. These populations had a RR50 lower or equal to the SRL, and 100% mortality to DD (Table 2). In agreement with PAHO criteria, they were considered as susceptible to deltamethrin since all had a RR <5.
Table 2

Toxicological profile to deltamethrin in wild and domestic Triatoma infestans from Gran Chaco and the Inter-Andean Valleys of Bolivia

Population

Slope +/- SD

X 2 (df) P

LD50(95% CI)

RR50(95%)

DD% (N°)

CIPEIN (SRL)

240

2.83 +/-0.04

3.43 (4) 0.51

0.42 (0.35 - 0.49)

-

-

San Silvestre - S

300

1.97+/-0.05

0.51 (6) 0.00

0.26 (0.21 - 0.32)

0.62

100 (60)

Terra Plem - S

300

2.61 +/- 0.03

2.72 (6) 0.15

0.39 (0.33 - 0.46)

0.93

100 (60)

Tita Chaco - S

270

2.72+/-0.04

0.54 (5) 0.01

0.48 (0.41 - 0.58)

1.16

100 (60)

Mataral - S

390

4.36 +/- 0.02

1.75 (9) 5.16

1.78 (1.63 - 1.93)

4.24

96 (60)

Cotapachi - S

240

4.69+/-0.02

1.72 (6) 0.05

1.22 (1.11 -1.34)

2.90

100 (66)

Tamachindi - D

390

5.46 +/- 0.02

1.43 (9) 2.35

1.75 (1.62 - 1.87)

4.21

93(60)

Rancho Nuevo -D

390

4.43+/- 0.02

2.41 (10) 7.94

2.09 (1.93 - 2.27)

5.04

93 (45)

Mataral - D

480

2.92+/- 0.30

1.84 (2) 0.00

3.52 (3.15 - 4.02)

8.49

62 (60)

Villa Montes - D

360

2.25 +/- 0.04

3.05 (9) 0.04

54.23 (45.54 - 63.32)

129.12

0 (50)

SD: standard deviation; X2: chi-squared; df: degrees of freedom; P: probability value; LD50: Insecticide dose that killed 50% of the population (ng/insect); CI: confidence intervals; RR: resistance ratio; DD: % mortality of the discriminating dose; SRL: susceptible reference lineage; S: Sylvatic (wild); D: Domestic; N°: number of individuals used.

Regarding the populations from the Inter-Andean Valleys, T. infestans from the Cotapachi community were identified as common morph and presented a RR50 of 2.90 and 100% mortality to the DD. Furthermore, Mataral community T. infestans individuals were identified as Mataral morph and presented a RR50 of 4.24 and 96% mortality to the DD (Table 2).

Interestingly, we observed that T. infestans dark morph from the Chaco had lower slopes than the SRL (<2.83), whereas Mataral and Cotapachi populations had higher slopes (4.36 and 4.69, respectively).

Domestic populations

Out of the four domestic populations studied, all bugs were identified as T. infestans common morph. Domestic populations from Mataral had a RR50 of 8.49 and 62% mortality to the DD. In the Rancho Nuevo and Tamachindi populations the RR50 was 4.21 and 5.04 respectively with 93% mortality to the DD for both communities. The level of resistance estimated for the Villa Montes population (RR50 = 129.12) and the mortality % to the DD (0%) drew our attention (Table 2).

Regarding the estimated slopes, the Tamachindi and Rancho Nuevo populations presented higher values than the SRL (5.46 and 4.43 respectively). On the other hand, resistant individuals from Mataral and Villa Montes presented slopes similar to the SRL (2.92 and 2.25 respectively).

Discussion

This study shows the high susceptibility to deltamethrin determined for three wild populations of T. infestans dark morph from the Gran Chaco region of Bolivia, which in turn corresponds to the non-Andean region according to the cytogenetic classification of Panzera et al.[34]. These populations presented RR50 values equal to or less than the SRL. According to the criteria established by PAHO [41] they were considered susceptible to the tested insecticide (RR50 < 5). Notwithstanding, wild Andean populations from Mataral and Cotapachi were less susceptible than SRL and T. infestans dark morph populations.

Interestingly, wild T. infestans Mataral morph had a RR50 = 4.24 and thus they are less susceptible than the SRL, but less thanRR50 = 5 (PAHO criteria) and thus would be considered as susceptible. However, previous studies performed by Roca-Acevedo et al.[27] on the same region had reported individuals resistant to deltamethrin and fipronil (RR50 = 11.9 e 23.4 respectively). Additionally, in our study of domestic T. infestans in the same area we observed a deltamethrin RR50 of 8.49 whereas Roca-Acevedo et al.[27] reported a RR50 of 17.4. The differences between the values may be due to the fact that Roca-Acevedo et al.[27] used a different SRL to estimate the RR50.

Depickère et al.[14] reported 96% mortality to the deltamethrin DD in individuals from a wild Mataral population. Our results for individuals from the same population agree with this report. The same authors reported the susceptibility of eight wild populations of T. infestans, corresponding to the Andean region [34] from Bolivia. Among the populations they tested, the one from Cotapachi, presented a 100% mortality to the DD. Our study also evaluated a wild population from the same region, and similar qualitative test results were obtained (100% mortality to the DD). Nevertheless, the individuals we tested were less susceptible to deltamethirn than the SRL (RR50 = 2.90).

The DD is a qualitative method for rapid detection of resistant populations. Several T. infestans insecticide resistance studies have evaluated toxicological profiles using RR and DD criteria [14],[18]-[21],[27]. Nevertheless, the results obtained by both criteria are not always congruent. Thus, Picollo [42] proposed that the single dose killing 99% of the SRL (1X LD99) would be a more appropriate DD value. This dose permits detecting high mortality among susceptible individuals and low mortality among resistant. Increasing the DD value to twice the LD99, as proposed by Lardeux et al.[21], carries the risk of identifying resistant individuals as susceptible due to the high mortality % that would be estimated. This could occur mainly in populations that are in the process of selection for the resistance character, populations in which the toxicological profile would be masked. In contrast, populations with an established resistance character would not present this problem.

We consider that the sample number is an important limiting factor when assessing insecticide resistance. In addition, stochastic variability sources within the studied population must be taken into account. The study developed by Amelotti et al.[43] showed that females within an age range can produce individuals with different susceptibility profiles. Due to that, they recommended increasing the sample number to at least 60 individuals with no less than 10 females and with different ages represented per population. This approach would increase the reliability of the obtained results, avoiding false negatives and reducing incorrect interpretation.

During our study domestic populations of T. infestans from the Tamachindi and Rancho Nuevo communities, both from the Gran Chaco of the Santa Cruz Department (non-Andean region), were also evaluated. These populations were less susceptible than the SRL with a RR50 of 4.21 and 5.04 respectively. They both had 93% mortality to the DD. In several communities of the same region Depickère et al.[14] reported reduced susceptibility to deltamethrin in domestic T. infestans. It is possible that lower levels of insecticide susceptibility play an important role in the reinfestation process of domestic dwellings. Population genetics studies performed by Quisberth et al. [44] have confirmed that the reinfestation of houses in these communities happens due to residual populations and not due to invasion of wild bugs.

However, the resistance levels registered for populations collected in communities from the Gran Chaco of the Santa Cruz Department (non-Andean region) both in our study and by Depickère et al.[14], are not as high as the levels we registered for the Villa Montes population (RR >129.12 and 0% mortality to the DD). The latter, is considered as an Intermediate group, a result of the cross between Andean and non-Andean individuals [45]. Lardeux et al.[21] and Depickère et al.[14] emphasized that T. infestans populations from the Santa Cruz Department, where non-Andean populations occur, are more susceptible to deltamethrin. So Tarija populations (Intermediate), where high levels of resistance have been observed, also show low levels of mortality to the DD (<20%) [14],[19]-[21]. These observations are very important since they correspond to a border area between Argentina and Bolivia, where high resistance levels have been reported [18],[20].

Our study has also evaluated different T. infestans domestic and wild morph populations from different regions in Bolivia, both from the Inter-Andean Valleys (Andean region) and Gran Chaco (non-Andean region). For each population we obtained different susceptibility profiles. Recent studies indicate that most wild populations of T. infestans of the Andean regions in Bolivia are susceptible to deltamethrin [14],[21],[27]. However, resistance to deltamethrin and fipronil has also been reported in some wild populations from the Julo Grande and Kirus Mayu (Potosí Department) and Mataral (Cochabamba Department) in Bolivia [14],[27]. Thus, our data and the aforementioned reports, support the idea that populations of T. infestans from different geographic areas and morphs have different toxicological profiles [15],[21],[22],[27].

Population genetics studies consider Bolivia as a center of origin and dispersion of T. infestans[8],[45]-[48]. The existence of wild foci and different morphs of this species, added to its wide distribution in that country [8]-[10],[49], suggest a high genetic variability of this species in Bolivia. Therefore, Dias & Schofield [50] consider that the high genetic variability of T. infestans would explain why natural resistance and high levels of resistance to insecticides have developed in Bolivia.

Slope values have been used as indicators of population heterogeneity [27]. High slope values are related to low genetic variation, whereas populations in process of selection and thus showing genetic variation relate to less steep slopes (when compared to SRL slope) [51]. In this study 4 out of the 9 tested populations had values that suggest phenotypic variation. The three wild dark morph susceptible populations, and the domestic Villa Montes resistant population (Table 1).

The different toxicological profiles determined for domestic and wild populations of T. infestans could be the result of selective pressure from insecticide application plus the genetic variability of the highly structured populations present in this country [52]-[56]. Moreover, genetic studies through chromosomal markers performed by Panzera et al.[45] suggest that pyrethroid resistant populations from the Argentinean-Bolivian border are most likely the result of recent secondary contact between both chromosomal groups (Andean and non-Andean) suggesting a correlation between genomic variability and insecticide resistant populations.

The origin of resistance is unknown in wild Bolivian populations, because they have never had contact with insecticides and is probably due genetic variability. However, more genetic studies should be performed to characterize the resistance phenotype.

Conclusion

Wild and domestic T. infestans populations from the Inter-Andean Valleys (Andean region) and Gran Chaco (non-Andean region) from Bolivia, have different susceptibility profiles towards deltamethrin. Although most wild populations are susceptible, insecticide resistance was observed in one. The existence of wild foci and different morphs of T. infestans plus its wide distribution in Bolivia are indicative of genetic variability. This could explain the occurrence of resistance in wild populations and thus we suggest that more genetic studies are performed on these populations and the resistance phenotypes are tested under field conditions.

Authors' contributions

All the authors have contributed substantially to this study. Conceived and designed the experiments: MBG, GCDP, LGD. Performed the experiments: MBG, ACLR. Analyzed the data: MBG, GCDP. Contributed material biologic: ALGO, MRC, FN. Wrote the paper: MBG, GCDP, LGD. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Abbreviations

Ng: 

Nano grams

mg: 

Milligrams

a.i: 

Active ingredient

°C: 

Celsius degree

μL: 

Microliters

RH: 

Humidity relative

Declarations

Acknowledgements

This study was supported by the Project No. 9871 FAPEMIG/FIOCRUZ/CPQRR/DEMANDA UNIVERSAL; PEC-PG Capes/Brazil through granting of a doctoral scholarship of Marinely Bustamante Gomez.

We thank to the Escuela Técnica de Salud together with Roberto Rodriguez and Jorge Espinoza; IRD - Bolivia and to the National Chagas Desease Control Program of Bolivia for assistance in the collection of Triatominae on the field; to Bayer S.A. Brazil for providing the insecticide used; Luis Martinez Villegas for the correction of English and especially to François Noireau (1955 - 2011) for incentivizing this research, making this article as a tribute to his memory.

Authors’ Affiliations

(1)
Laboratório de Triatomíneos e Epidemiologia da Doença de Chagas, Centro de Pesquisas René Rachou - FIOCRUZ Minas
(2)
Instituto de Investigaciones Biomédicas - Facultad de Medicina, Universidad Mayor de San Simón
(3)
CEADES Salud y Medio Ambiente
(4)
Institute de Recherche pour le Developemente (IRD)

References

  1. Control of Chagas disease, WHO Technical Report Series 811. 1991, World Health Organization, GenevaGoogle Scholar
  2. Dias PJC: Southern Cone Initiative for the elimination of domestic populations of Triatoma infestans and the interruption of transfusional Chagas disease. Historical aspects, present situation, and perspectives. Mem Inst Oswaldo Cruz. 2007, 102 (1): 11-18. 10.1590/S0074-02762007005000092.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. Schofield CJ, Dias JCP: The Southern Cone Initiative against Chagas disease. Adv Parasitol. 1999, 42: 1-27. 10.1016/S0065-308X(08)60147-5.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. Dias JCP: O controle da doença de Chagas no Brazil. El Control de la Enfermedad de Chagas en los Países del Cono Sur de América. Historia de una Iniciativa Internacional. 1991/2001. Edited by: Silveira AC. 2002, Faculdade de Medicina do Triângulo Mineiro, Uberaba, 145-250.Google Scholar
  5. Schofield CJ, Jannin J, Salvatella R: The future of Chagas disease control. Trends Parasitol. 2006, 12: 583-588. 10.1016/j.pt.2006.09.011.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  6. Gürtler RE: Sustaintability of vector control strategies in the Gran Chaco Region: current challenges and possible approaches. Mem Inst Oswaldo Cruz. 2009, 104 (1): 52-59.PubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. Germano MD, Picollo MI, Mougabure-Cueto GA: Microgeographical study of insecticide resistance in Triatoma infestans from Argentina. Acta Trop. 2013, 28 (3): 561-565. 10.1016/j.actatropica.2013.08.007.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  8. Waleckx E, Salas R, Huamán N, Buitrago R, Bosseno MF, Aliaga C, Barnabé C, Rodriguez R, Zoveda F, Monje M, Baune M, Quisberth S, Villena E, Kengne P, Noireau F, Brenière SF: New insights on the Chagas disease main vector Triatoma infestans (Reduviidae, Triatominae) brought by the genetic analysis of Bolivian sylvatic populations. Infect Genet Evol. 2011, 11: 1045-1057. 10.1016/j.meegid.2011.03.020.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. Waleckx E, Depickère S, Salas R, Aliaga C, Monje M, Calle H, Buitrago R, Noireau F, Brenière SF: New discoveries of sylvatic Triatoma infestans (Hemiptera: Reduviidae) throughout the Bolivian Chaco. Am J Trop Med Hyg. 2012, 86: 455-458. 10.4269/ajtmh.2012.11-0205.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. Noireau F: Wild Triatoma infestans, a potential threat that needs to be monitored. I Mem inst Oswaldo Cruz. 2009, 104: 60-64. 10.1590/S0074-02762009000900010.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. Ceballos LA, Piccinali RV, Berkunsky I, Kitron U, Gürtler RE: First finding of melanic sylvatic Triatoma infestans (Hemiptera: Reduviidae) colonies in the Argentine Chaco. J Med Entomol. 2009, 46: 1195-1202. 10.1603/033.046.0530.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. Bacigalupo A, Torres-Perez F, Segovia V, Garcia A, Correa JP, Moreno L, Arroyo P, Cattan PE: Sylvatic foci of the Chagas disease vector Triatoma infestans in Chile: description of a new focus and challenges for control programs. Mem Inst Oswaldo Cruz. 2010, 105: 633-641. 10.1590/S0074-02762010000500006.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. Rolón M, Vega MC, Román F, Gámez A, Rojas de Arias A: First report of colonies of sylvatic Triatoma infestans(Hemiptera: Reduviidae) in the Paraguayan Chaco, using a trained dog. PLoS Negl Trop Dis. 2011, 5: e1026-10.1371/journal.pntd.0001026.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. Depickère S, Buitrago R, Siñani E, Baune M, Monje M, Lopez R, Waleckx E, Chavez T, Brenière SF: Susceptibility and resistance to deltamethrin of wild and domestic populations of Triatoma infestans (Reduviidae: Triatominae) in Bolivia: new discoveries. Mem Inst Oswaldo Cruz. 2012, 107 (8): 1042-1047. 10.1590/S0074-02762012000800013.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. Cecere MC, Vazquez-Prokopec GM, Gurtler RE, Kitron U: Spatio-temporal analysis of reinfestation by Triatoma infestans (Hemiptera: Reduviidae) following insecticides praying in a rural community in north western Argentina. Am J Trop Med Hyg. 2004, 71: 803-810.PubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. Marcet PL, Mora MS, Cutrera AP, Jones L, Gurtler RE, Kitron U, Dotson EM: Genetic structure of Triatoma infestans populations in rural communities of Santiago del Estero, northern Argentina. Infect Gene Evol. 2008, 8: 835-846. 10.1016/j.meegid.2008.08.002.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  17. Gürtler RE, Kitron U, Cecere MC, Segura EL, Cohen JE: Sustainable vector control and management of Chagas disease in the Gran Chaco, Argentina. Proc Natl Acad Sci. 2007, 104: 16194-16199. 10.1073/pnas.0700863104.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. Picollo MI, Vassena CV, Santo-Orihuela P, Barrios S, Zaidemberg M, Zerba EN: High resistance to pyrethroid insecticides associated with ineffective field treatments in Triatoma infestans (Hemiptera: Reduviidae) from Northern Argentina. J Med Entomol. 2005, 42: 637-642. 10.1603/0022-2585(2005)042[0637:HRTPIA]2.0.CO;2.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. Santo-Orihuela PL, Vassena CV, Zerba EN, Picollo MI: Relative contribution of monooxygenase and esterase to pyrethroid resistance in Triatoma infestans (Hemiptera: Reduviidae) from Argentina and Bolivia. J Med Entomol. 2008, 45: 298-306. 10.1603/0022-2585(2008)45[298:RCOMAE]2.0.CO;2.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  20. Germano MD, Roca-Acevedo G, Mougabure-Cueto GA, Toloza AC, Vassena CV, Picollo MI: New findings of insecticide resistance in Triatoma infestans (Heteroptera: Reduviidae) from the Gran Chaco. J Med Entomol. 2010, 47: 1077-1081. 10.1603/ME10069.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. Lardeux F, Depickere S, Duchon S, Chavez T: Insecticide resistance of Triatoma infestans (Hemiptera, Reduviidae) vector of Chagas disease in Bolivia. Trop Med Int Health. 2010, 15: 1037-1048.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. Vassena CV, Picollo MI, Santo-Orihuela P, Zerba EN: In Triatominos de Bolivia y la Enfermedad de Chagas. Edited by Cortez MR. Ministerio de Salud y Deportes de Bolivia - Programa Nacional de Chagas; 2007:229-255.Google Scholar
  23. Alarico AG, Romero N, Hernández L, Catalá S, Gorla D: Residual effect of a micro-encapsulated formulation of organophosphates and piriproxifen on the mortality of deltamethrin resistant Triatoma infestans populations in rural houses of the Bolivian Chaco region. Mem Inst Oswaldo Cruz. 2010, 105: 752-756. 10.1590/S0074-02762010000600004.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. Pedrini N, Mijailovsky SJ, Girotti JR, Stariolo R, Cardozo RM, Gentile A, Juárez MP: Control of pyrethroid-resistant Chagas disease vectors with ento-mopathogenic fungi. PLoS Negl Trop. 2009, 3: e434-10.1371/journal.pntd.0000434.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  25. Fabro J, Sterkel M, Capriotti N, Mougabure-Cueto G, Germano M, Rivera-Pomar R, Ons S: Identification of a point mutation associated with pyrethroid resistance in the paratype sodium channel of Triatoma infestans, a vector of Chagas disease. Infect Genet Evol. 2012, 12: 487-491. 10.1016/j.meegid.2011.12.006.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  26. Germano MD, Santo-Orihuela P, Roca-Acevedo G, Toloza AC, Vassena C, Picollo MI, Mougabure-Cueto G: Scientific evidence of three different insecticide-resistant profiles in Triatoma infestans (Hemiptera: Reduviidae) populations from Argentina and Bolivia. J Med Entomol. 2012, 49: 1355-1360. 10.1603/ME12070.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  27. Roca-Acevedo G, Germano M, Santo-Orihuela P, Mougabure Cueto G, Cortez MR, Noireau F, Picollo MI, Vassena C: Susceptibility of wild Triatoma infestans from Andean Valleys of Bolivia to Deltamethrin and Fipronil. J Med Entomol. 2011, 48: 828-835. 10.1603/ME10208.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  28. Noireau F, Rojas Cortéz MG, Monteiro FA, Jansen AM, Torrico F: Can wild Triatoma infestans foci in Bolivia jeopardize Chagas disease control efforts?. Trends Parasitol. 2005, 21: 7-10. 10.1016/j.pt.2004.10.007.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  29. Ceballos LA, Piccinali RV, Marcet PL, Vazques-Prokopec GM, Cardinal MV, Schachter-Broide J, Dujardin JP, Dotson EM, Kitrom U, Gürtler RE: Hidden sylvatic foci of the main vector of Chagas disease Triatoma infestans: threats to the vector elimination campaign?. PLoS Negl Trop Dis. 2011, 5 (10): 1365-10.1371/journal.pntd.0001365.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  30. Noireau F, Flores R, Vargas F: Trapping sylvatic Triatominae (Reduviidae) in 210 hollow trees. Trans R Soc Trop Med Hyg. 1999, 93: 13-14. 10.1016/S0035-9203(99)90161-X.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  31. Noireau F, Abad-Franch F, Valente SAS, Dias-Lima A, Lopes CM, Cunha V, Valente VC, Palomeque FS, de Carvalho-Pinto CJ, Sherlock I, Aguilar M, Steindel M, Grisard EC, Jurberg J: Trapping Triatominae in silvatic habitats. Mem Inst Oswaldo Cruz. 2002, 97: 61-63. 10.1590/S0074-02762002000100009.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  32. Noireau F, Flores R, Gutierrez T, Dujardin JP: Detection of sylvatic dark morphs of Triatoma infestans in the Bolivian Chaco. Mem Inst Oswaldo Cruz. 1997, 92: 583-584. 10.1590/S0074-02761997000500003.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  33. Cortez MR, Emperaire L, Piccinali RV, Gurtler RE, Torrico F, Jansen AM, Noireau F: Sylvatic Triatoma infestans (Reduviidae, Triatominae) in the Andean valleys of Bolivia. Acta Trop. 2007, 102: 47-54. 10.1016/j.actatropica.2007.02.014.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  34. Panzera F, Dujardin JP, Nicolini P, Caraccio MN, Rose V, Tellez T, Bermudez H, Bargues MD, Mas-Coma S, O’Connor JE, Perez R: Genomic changes of Chagas disease vector, South America. Emerg Infect Dis. 2004, 10: 438-446. 10.3201/eid1003.020812.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  35. Lent H, Wygodzinsky P: Revision of the Triatominae (Hemiptera, Reduviidae), and their significance as vectors of Chagas' disease.Bull Amer Mus Nat Hist 1979:163.,Google Scholar
  36. Picollo MI, Wood E, Zerba E, Licastro SA, Ruveda MA: Métodos de laboratorio para medir la actividad de insecticidas en Triatoma infestans. Acta Bioquim Clin Latinoam. 1976, 10: 67-71.Google Scholar
  37. Protocolo de evaluación de efecto insecticida sobre triatomineos. Acta Toxicol Argentina. 1994, 2: 29-32.Google Scholar
  38. Pessoa GCD: Monitoramento da Suscetibilidade ao Piretróide Deltametrina em Populações de Triatoma sórdida Stål, 1859 (Hemiptera: Reduviidae). Masters thesis. Centro de Pesquisa René Rachou FIOCRUZ/MG Pós-graduação em Ciências da Saúde. 2008, Doenças Infecciosas e Parasitárias, Área de concentração, 43-45.Google Scholar
  39. Guidelines for testing mosquito adulticides for indoor residual spraying and treatment of mosquito nets. WHO/CDS/NTD/WHOPES/GCDPP/. 2006, 3: 60-Google Scholar
  40. Raymond M, Prato G, Ratsira D: PROBIT Analysis of Mortality Assays Displaying Quantal Response, Version 3.3. 1993, Praxème Sarl, St. Georges d’Orques, FranceGoogle Scholar
  41. Organización Panamericana de Salud: II Reunión Técnica Latinoamericana de Monitoreo de Resistencia a Insecticidas en Triatomineos Vectores de Chagas Panamá. . 11 al 13 de Abril 2005.,Google Scholar
  42. Picollo MI: Métodos de Detección y Monitoreo de Resistencia en Triatominos. Acta Toxicol Argent. 1994, 2 (1-2): 29-58.Google Scholar
  43. Amelotti I, Romero N, Catalá SS, Gorla DE: Variability of the Susceptibility to Deltamethrin in Triatoma infestans: the Female Factor. J Med Entomol. 2011, 48 (6): 1167-1173. 10.1603/ME11065.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  44. Quisberth S, Waleckx E, Monje M, Chang B, Noireau F, Brenière SF: “Andean” and “non-Andean” ITS-2 and mtCytB haplotypes of Triatoma infestans are observed in the Gran Chaco (Bolivia): population genetics and the origin of reinfestation. Infect Genet Evol. 2011, 11: 1006-1014. 10.1016/j.meegid.2011.03.014.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  45. Panzera F, Ferreiro MJ, Pita S, Calleros L, Pérez R, Basmadjián Y, Guevara Y, Brenière SF, Panzera Y: Evolutionary and dispersal history of Triatoma infestans, main vector of Chagas disease, by chromosomal markers. Infect Genet Evol. 2014, 27: 105-113. 10.1016/j.meegid.2014.07.006.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  46. Bargues MD, Klisiowicz DR, Panzera F, Noireau F, Marcilla A, Perez R, Rojas MG, O’Connor JE, Gonzalez-Candelas F, Galvão C, Jurberg J, Carcavallo RU, Dujardin JP, Mas-Coma S: Origin and phylogeography of the Chagas disease main vector Triatoma infestans based on nuclear rDNA sequences and genome size. PLoS Negl Trop Dis. 2006, 6: 46-62.Google Scholar
  47. Cortez MR, Monteiro FA, Noireau F: New insights on the spread of Triatoma infestans from Bolivia implications for Chagas disease emergence in the southern cone. Infect Genet Evol. 2010, 10: 350-353. 10.1016/j.meegid.2009.12.006.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  48. Torres-Perez F, Acuna-Retamar M, Cook JA, Bacigalupo A, Garcia A, Cattan PE: Statistical phylogeography of Chagas disease vector Triatoma infestans: testing biogeographic hypotheses of dispersal. Infect Genet Evol. 2011, 11: 167-174. 10.1016/j.meegid.2010.09.005.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  49. Buitrago R, Waleckx E, Bosseno MF, Zoveda F, Vidaurre P, Salas R, Mamani E, Noireau F, Brenière SF: First report of widespread wild populations of Triatoma infestans (Reduviidae, Triatominae) in the valleys of La Paz, Bolivia. Am J Trop Med Hyg. 2010, 82: 574-579. 10.4269/ajtmh.2010.09-0325.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  50. Dias JP, Schofield CJ: Introducción. Triatominos de Bolivia y la enfermedad de Chagas. Edited by: Cortez MR. 2007, Ministerio de Salud y Deportes de Bolivia - Programa Nacional de Chagas, Bolivia, 229-255.Google Scholar
  51. Chilcutt CF, Tabashnik BE: Evolution of pesticide resistance and slope of the concentration-mortality line: are they related? J. Econ Entomol. 1995, 88: 11-20.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  52. de Rosas ARP, Segura EL, García BA: Microsatellite analysis of genetic structure in natural Triatoma infestans (Hemiptera: Reduviidae) populations from Argentina: its implication in assessing the effectiveness of Chagas' disease vector control programmes. Mol Ecol. 2007, 16: 1401-1412. 10.1111/j.1365-294X.2007.03251.x.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  53. de Rosas ARP, Segura EL, Fichera L, García BA: Macrogeographic and microgeographic genetic structure of the Chagas' disease vector Triatoma infestans (Hemiptera:Reduviidae) from Catamarca, Argentina. Genetica. 2008, 133: 247-260. 10.1007/s10709-007-9208-8.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  54. Abrahan L, Hernández L, Gorla D, Catalá S: Phenotypic Diversity of Triatoma infestans at the microgeographic level in the Gran Chaco of Argentina and the Andean valleys of Bolivia. J Med Entomol. 2008, 45: 660-666. 10.1603/0022-2585(2008)45[660:PDOTIA]2.0.CO;2.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  55. Pizarro JC, Gilligan LM, Stevens L: Microsatellites reveal a high population structure in Triatoma infestans from Chuquisaca. Bolivia. PLoS Negl Trop Dis. 2008, 2 (3): e202-10.1371/journal.pntd.0000202. doi:10.1371/journal.pntd.0000202View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  56. Segura EL, Torres AG, Fusco O, Garcia A: Mitochondrial 16S DNA variation in populations of Triatoma infestans from Argentina. Med Vet Entomol. 2009, 23: 34-40. 10.1111/j.1365-2915.2008.00749.x.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright

© Bustamante Gomez et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2014

This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly credited. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.

Comments

By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.

Advertisement