Open Access

Further spreading of canine oriental eyeworm in Europe: first report of Thelazia callipaeda in Romania

  • Andrei Daniel Mihalca1,
  • Gianluca D’Amico1Email author,
  • Iuliu Scurtu2,
  • Ramona Chirilă3,
  • Ioana Adriana Matei1 and
  • Angela Monica Ionică1
Parasites & Vectors20158:48

https://doi.org/10.1186/s13071-015-0663-2

Received: 13 November 2014

Accepted: 15 January 2015

Published: 27 January 2015

Abstract

Background

Despite the increasing number of reports of autochthonous cases of ocular thelaziosis in dogs in several European countries, and the evident emergence of human cases, the distribution and spreading potential of this parasite is far for being fully known. In Romania, despite intensive surveillance performed over recent years on the typical hosts of T. callipaeda, the parasite has not been found until now.

Methods

In October 2014 a German Shepherd was presented for consultation to a private veterinary practice from western Romania with a history of unilateral chronic conjunctivitis. Following a close examination of the affected eye, nematodes were noticed in the conjunctival sac. The specimens collected were used for morphological examination (light microscopy) and molecular analysis (amplification of the cytochrome c oxidase subunit 1 gene, followed by sequencing).

Results

Thirteen nematodes were collected, all identified morphologically as T. callipaeda. The history of the dog revealed no travel outside Romania, and during the last year, not even outside the home locality. The BLAST analysis of our sequence showed a 100% similarity T. callipaeda haplotype h1.

Conclusions

This is the first report of T. callipaeda in Romania, which we consider to be with autochthonous transmission. These findings confirm the spreading trend of T callipaeda and the increased risk of emerging vector-borne zoonoses.

Keywords

Thelazia callipaeda Emerging diseaseCanine vector-borne diseases

Background

Thelazia callipaeda is a vector-borne zoonotic eyeworm, parasitizing the conjunctival sac of domestic and wild carnivores (foxes, beech martens and wolves), rabbits and humans. Its presence is associated with mild to severe ocular disease [1,2]. The distribution includes vast territories in Asia (hence the name “oriental eye worm”) but also in former Soviet Union [3]. In Europe, the first report came from Italy [4] followed by various subsequent records in the same country [5-7]. However, during the last decade, the knowledge about its distribution in Europe has been greatly expanded (Table 1). The vector was demonstrated by Otranto et al. [8,9], when the nematodes were successfully transmitted by the drosophilid fly, Phortica variegata (Drosophilidae, Steganinae).
Table 1

Emergence of Thelazia callipaeda in Europe between 2007 and 2014

Year

First report of autochthonous cases

Reference

2007

France

[10]

2008

Switzerland

[11]

2010

Germany

[12]

2011

Spain

[13]

2012

Portugal

[14]

2014

Bosnia and Herzegovina

[2]

2014

Croatia

[2]

2014

Romania

Present study

All the T. callipaeda isolates in Europe for which sequences of partial cytochrome c oxidase subunit 1 (cox1) are available belong to the haplotype 1 (h1), suggesting a high degree of nematode-host affiliations for this haplotype [15].

Based on climatic analysis, a wider European distribution was suggested already in 2003 by Otranto et al. [7]. Despite our recent intensive surveillance on vector-borne diseases of wild (foxes, jackals, wolves, wild cats, lynxes) and domestic carnivores (dogs, cats) in Romania [16-24], until now we were not able to confirm the presence of this zoonotic helminth in Romania.

The aim of this study was to extend the knowledge on the geographical distribution of T. callipaeda in Europe and to identify the haplotype circulating in Romania.

Methods

In October 2014, a dog (German Shepherd x Siberian Husky cross breed, castrated male, 9 years old) was presented for consultation to a private veterinary practice from Oradea, Bihor County, in western Romania (47.06 N, 21.90E) with a history of unilateral chronic conjunctivitis (right eye). After one month of local intra-conjunctival treatment with antibiotics, as the animal’s condition was not improving, the owner brought the case to our attention (by author RC). Following a close examination of the affected eye, alive, white, medium-sized nematodes were noticed in the conjunctival sac. As part of the treatment, all nematodes were collected during superficial anaesthesia (Xylazine + Ketamine), using a fine blunt tweezers and preserved for further examination in absolute ethanol (3 specimens) and 5% formalin (10 specimens). We have obtained the verbal consent of the owner to use the collected material for a scientific publication and he kindly provided the travel history of the dog.

The specimens collected in formalin were used for morphological examination. The nematodes were mounted on a glass slide, cleared with lactophenol and examined using an Olympus BX61 microscope. Photographs and measurements for morphologic identification were taken using a DP72 camera and Cell^F software (Olympus Corporation, Japan).

The specimens collected in absolute ethanol were analysed using molecular techniques. Genomic DNA was extracted from a gravid female using a commercial kit (Isolate II Genomic DNA Kit, BIOLINE, UK) according to the manufacturer’s instructions. Amplification of a partial cytochrome c oxidase subunit 1 (cox1) gene of spirurid nematodes (670 bp) was performed using the NTF/NTR primer pair, following reaction procedures and protocols described in literature [25]. PCR products were visualized by electrophoresis in a 2% agarose gel stained with RedSafeTM 20000× Nucleic Acid Staining Solution (Chembio, UK) and their molecular weight was assessed by comparison to a molecular marker (O’GeneRulerTM 100 bp DNA Ladder, Thermo Fisher Scientific Inc., USA). Amplicons were purified using silica-membrane spin columns (QIAquick PCR Purification Kit, Quiagen) and then sequenced (performed at Macrogen Europe, Amsterdam). Sequences were compared to those available in GenBank™ dataset by Basic Local Alignment Search Tool (BLAST) analysis.

Results

From the conjunctival sac of the right eye, 12 nematodes were collected. Additionally, one nematode was also found in the conjunctival sac of the apparently non-affected left eye. A close examination of the affected right eye revealed the presence of proliferative lesions in the inferior conjunctival sac (Figure 1), epiphora and conjunctivitis. The history of the dog as recalled by the owner did not include any travel outside Romania, and in the last year, not even outside the city limits of Oradea.
Figure 1

Clinical aspect of the infection with the presence of nematodes.

Light microscopy (Figure 2) examination of the nematodes revealed typical specific features of T. callipaeda [26]. All 13 collected nematodes were females (no males were found).
Figure 2

Typical morphology of the anterior extremity of female T. callipaeda (x400).

The BLAST analysis of our sequence (GenBank™ accession number KP087796) showed a 100% similarity to a sequence (GenBank™ accession number AM042549) of T. callipaeda haplotype h1 [15].

Discussion

After the previous records in Europe (Italy, France, Switzerland, Germany, Spain, Portugal, Bosnia and Herzegovina, Croatia), the current study reports the presence of the zoonotic eyeworm T. callipaeda for the first time in Romania. Considering that the host dog has never travel to other known endemic areas, nor outside the city limits in the last year, we regard this as a sufficient proof for the existence of an autochthonous transmission cycle. So far, this is the most easternmost report in Europe (except previous records from the former USSR), confirming in our opinion the spread of this nematode.

Often, disease emergence and spreading, is only apparent due to lack of sufficient investigation, mainly in the case of non-clinical infections which require targeted laboratory diagnosis. However, in the case of canine ocular thelaziasis, we consider the disease new to Romania, as the infection is usually clinical and can be hardly overlooked by owners and clinicians. Moreover, in the past 5 years, the authors of the present paper had intensively focused on the surveillance of vector-borne pathogens in domestic and wild carnivores, with more than one thousand potential hosts individuals investigated and specifically examined for eye worms from various regions of the country (including western Romania). Additionally, to our knowledge, T. callipaeda was not found to date in any of the neighbouring countries (i.e. Hungary, Bulgaria, Serbia, Republic of Moldavia or Ukraine).

The only confirmed vector for T. callipaeda is Phortica variegata (Diptera, Drosophilidae, Steganinae) has been reported in Romania on various occasions [27]. Its presence is known from the following counties: Buzău, Giurgiu, Constanța, Caraș-Severin, Mehedinți, Timiș, Maramureș, Ialomița and Teleorman [27]. As Oradea (Bihor County) has similar climatic and ecologic conditions with the known area of P. variegata occurrence in Romania, the vector is also probably present here. However, further entomological surveys are required for its confirmation.

Genetic analysis of cox1 confirmed the existence in Europe of a single haplotype, as defined earlier [15], suggesting a west to east spread of the parasite in Europe. However, it is not clear which are the possible routes of disease spreading, but most probably this is related to host circulation rather that vector emergence or climate change.

Cats have been also implicated in clinical cases of ocular infections with T. callipaeda, with reports from Italy, France, Portugal and Switzerland [5,7,10,28-31]. Recent data suggest also the potential reservoir role of wildlife in natural transmission cycles of this spirurid [32-34].

Conclusion

As T. callipaeda is an emerging zoonotic infection [35], our findings bring new important epidemiological data highlighting the need for increased awareness among owners, veterinarians and ophthalmologists, even outside the known endemic areas.

Declarations

Acknowledgements

The work of ADM, GA, IAM and MAI was done under the frame of EurNegVec COST Action TD1303. The financial support for the research was provided by project IDEI PCE 236/2011 (CNCS, UEFISCDI).

Authors’ Affiliations

(1)
Department of Parasitology and Parasitic Diseases, University of Agricultural Sciences and Veterinary Medicine Cluj-Napoca, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine
(2)
Department of Internal Medicine, University of Agricultural Sciences and Veterinary Medicine Cluj-Napoca, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine
(3)
Faculty of Environmental Protection, University of Oradea

References

  1. Otranto D, Traversa D. Thelazia eyeworm: an original endo- and ecto-parasitic nematode. Trends Parasitol. 2005;21:1–4.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  2. Hodžić A, Latrofa MS, Annoscia G, Alić A, Beck R, Lia RP, et al. The spread of zoonotic Thelazia callipaeda in the Balkan area. Parasit Vectors. 2014;7:352.PubMed CentralPubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  3. Anderson RC. Nematode Parasites of Vertebrates: Their Development and Transmission. Guilford: CABI Publishing; 2000.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  4. Rossi L, Bertaglia PP. Presence of Thelazia callipaeda Railliet & Henry, 1910, in Piedmont, Italy. Parassitologia. 1989;31:167–72.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. Di Sacco B, Ciocca A, Sirtori G. Thelazia callipaeda (Railliet and Henry, 1910) nel sacco congiuntivale di un gatto di Milano. Veterinaria. 1995;4:81–4. in Italian, with abstract in English.Google Scholar
  6. Lia RP, Garaguso M, Otranto D, Puccini V. First report of Thelazia callipaeda in Southern Italy, Basilicata region. Acta Parasitol. 2000;45:178.Google Scholar
  7. Otranto D, Ferroglio E, Lia RP, Traversa D, Rossi L. Current status and epidemiological observation of Thelazia callipaeda (Spirurida, Thelaziidae) in dogs, cats and foxes in Italy: a “coincidence” or a parasitic disease of the Old Continent? Vet Parasitol. 2003;116:315–25.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  8. Otranto D, Lia RP, Cantacessi C, Testini G, Troccoli A, Shen JL, et al. Nematode biology and larval development of Thelazia callipaeda (Spirurida, Thelaziidae) in the drosophilid intermediate host in Europe and China. Parasitology. 2005;131:847–55.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  9. Otranto D, Cantacessi C, Testini G, Lia RP. Phortica variegata as an intermediate host of Thelazia callipaeda under natural conditions: evidence for pathogen transmission by a male arthropod vector. Int J Parasitol. 2006;36:1167–73.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  10. Dorchies P, Chaudieu G, Siméon LA, Cazalot G, Cantacessi C, Otranto D. First reports of autochthonous eyeworm infection by Thelazia callipaeda (Spirurida, Thelaziidae) in dogs and cat from France. Vet Parasitol. 2007;149:294–7.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  11. Malacrida F, Hegglin D, Bacciarini L, Otranto D, Nägeli F, Nägeli C, et al. Emergence of canine ocular thelaziosis caused by Thelazia callipaeda in southern Switzerland. Vet Parasitol. 2008;157:321–7.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  12. Magnis J, Naucke TJ, Mathis A, Deplazes P, Schnyder M. Local transmission of the eye worm Thelazia callipaeda in southern Germany. Parasitol Res. 2010;106:715–7.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  13. Miró G, Montoya A, Hernández L, Dado D, Vázquez MV, Benito M, et al. Thelazia callipaeda: infection in dogs: a new parasite for Spain. Parasit Vectors. 2011;4:148.PubMed CentralPubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  14. Vieira L, Rodrigues FT, Costa A, Diz-Lopes D, Machado J, Coutinho T, et al. First report of canine ocular thelaziosis by Thelazia callipaeda in Portugal. Parasit Vectors. 2012;5:124.PubMed CentralPubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  15. Otranto D, Testini G, De Luca F, Hu M, Shamsi S, Gasser RB. Analysis of genetic variability within Thelazia callipaeda (Nematoda: Thelazioidea) from Europe and Asia by sequencing and mutation scanning of the mitochondrial cytochrome c oxidase subunit 1 gene. Mol Cell Probes. 2005;19:306–13.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  16. Kiss T, Cadar D, Krupaci AF, Bordeanu A, Brudaşcă GF, Mihalca AD, et al. Serological reactivity to Borrelia burgdorferi sensu lato in dogs and horses from distinct areas in Romania. Vector Borne Zoonotic Dis. 2011;11:1259–62.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  17. Mircean V, Dumitrache MO, Györke A, Pantchev N, Jodies R, Mihalca AD, et al. Seroprevalence and geographic distribution of Dirofilaria immitis and tick-borne infections (Anaplasma phagocytophilum, Borrelia burgdorferi sensu lato, and Ehrlichia canis) in dogs from Romania. Vector Borne Zoonotic Dis. 2012;12:595–604.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  18. Dumitrache MO, Kiss B, Dantas-Torres F, Latrofa MS, D’Amico G, Sándor AD, et al. Seasonal dynamics of Rhipicephalus rossicus attacking domestic dogs from the steppic region of southeastern Romania. Parasit Vectors. 2014;7:97.PubMed CentralPubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  19. Dumitrache MO, D’Amico G, Matei IA, Ionică A, Gherman CM, Sikó Barabási S, et al. Ixodid ticks in red foxes (Vulpes vulpes) from Romania. Parasit Vectors. 2014;7 Suppl 1:1.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  20. Mircean V, Dumitrache MO, Mircean M, Bolfa P, Györke A, Mihalca AD. Autochthonous canine leishmaniasis in Romania: neglected or (re)emerging? Parasit Vectors. 2014;7:135.PubMed CentralPubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  21. Ionică AM, D’Amico G, Mitková B, Kalmár Z, Annoscia G, Otranto D, et al. First report of Cercopithifilaria spp. in dogs from Eastern Europe with an overview of their geographic distribution in Europe. Parasitol Res. 2014;113:2761–4.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  22. Ionică AM, Matei IA, Mircean V, Dumitrache MO, Annoscia G, Otranto D, Modrý D, Mihalca AD. Filarial infections in dogs from Romania: a broader view. In Proceedings of Fourth European Dirofilaria and Angiostrongylus Days: 2-4 July 2014; Budapest. 1996:42.Google Scholar
  23. Sándor AD, Dumitrache MO, D’Amico G, Kiss BJ, Mihalca AD. Rhipicephalus rossicus and not R. sanguineus is the dominant tick species of dogs in the wetlands of the Danube Delta, Romania. Vet Parasitol. 2014;204:430–2.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  24. Mitková B, Qablan MA, Mihalca AD, Modrý D. Questing for the identity of Hepatozoon in foxes. Parasit Vectors. 2014;7 Suppl 1:O23.PubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  25. Casiraghi M, Anderson TJC, Bandi C, Bazzocchi C, Genchi C. A phylogenetic analysis of filarial nematodes: comparison with the phylogeny of Wolbachia endosymbionts. Parasitology. 2001;122:93–103.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  26. Otranto D, Lia RP, Traversa D, Giannetto S. Thelazia callipaeda (Spirurida, Thelaziidae) of carnivores and humans: morphological study by light and scanning electron microscopy. Parassitologia. 2003;45:125–33.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  27. TaxoDros: The database on Taxonomy of Drosophilidae. http://taxodros.uzh.ch. Accessed 12.01.2015.
  28. Ruytoor P, Déan E, Pennant O, Dorchies P, Chermette R, Otranto D, et al. Ocular thelaziosis in dogs, France. Emerg Infect Dis. 2010;16:1943–5.PubMed CentralPubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  29. Rodrigues FT, Cardoso L, Coutinho T, Otranto D, Diz-Lopes D. Ocular thelaziosis due to Thelazia callipaeda in a cat from northeastern Portugal. J Feline Med Surg. 2012;14:952–4.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  30. Soares C, Sousa SR, Anastacio S, Matias MG, Marques I, Mascarenhas S, et al. Feline thelaziosis caused by Thelazia callipaeda in Portugal. Vet Parasitol. 2013;196:528–31.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  31. Motta B, Nägeli F, Nägeli C, Solari-Basano F, Schiessl B, Deplazes P, et al. Epidemiology of the eye worm Thelazia callipaeda in cats from southern Switzerland. Vet Parasitol. 2014;203:287–93.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  32. Otranto D, Dantas-Torres F, Mallia E, DiGeronimo PM, Brianti E, Testini G, et al. Thelazia callipaeda (Spirurida, Thelaziidae) in wild animals: report of new host species and ecological implications. Vet Parasitol. 2009;166:262–7.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  33. Calero-Bernal R, Otranto D, Pérez-Martín JE, Serrano FJ, Reina D. First report of Thelazia callipaeda in wildlife from Spain. J Wildl Dis. 2013;49:458–60.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  34. Sargo R, Loureiro F, Catarino AL, Valente J, Silva F, Cardoso L, et al. First report of Thelazia callipaeda in red foxes (Vulpes vulpes) from Portugal. J Zoo Wildl Med. 2014;45:458–60.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  35. Otranto D, Dantas-Torres F, Brianti E, Traversa D, Petrić D, Genchi C, et al. Vector-borne helminths of dogs and humans in Europe. Parasit Vectors. 2013;6:16.PubMed CentralPubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar

Copyright

© Mihalca et al.; licensee BioMed Central. 2015

This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly credited. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.

Comments

By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.

Advertisement