Open Access

Toward the formation of a Companion Animal Parasite Council for the Tropics (CAPCT)

  • Rebecca J. Traub1,
  • Peter Irwin2,
  • Filipe Dantas-Torres3, 4Email author,
  • Gabriela Pérez Tort5,
  • Norma Vollmer Labarthe6,
  • Tawin Inpankaew7,
  • Mukulesh Gatne8,
  • Bui Khanh Linh9,
  • Volker Schwan10,
  • Malaika Watanabe11,
  • Susanne Siebert12,
  • Norbert Mencke12 and
  • Roland Schaper12
Parasites & Vectors20158:271

https://doi.org/10.1186/s13071-015-0884-4

Received: 29 April 2015

Accepted: 1 May 2015

Published: 13 May 2015

Abstract

This letter advises the imminent formation of the Companion Animal Parasites Council for the Tropics (CAPCT). The CAPCT consists of region-specific (e.g., Asia-Pacific, Latin America and Caribbean, Africa) experts comprising academics, veterinarians, parasitologists, physicians and allied industry partners that will work together to inform, guide and develop best-practice recommendations for the optimal diagnosis, treatment and control of companion animal parasites in the tropics, with the aim of protecting the health of pets and that of the public.

Keywords

Dogs Cats Parasites Tropics Anthelmintic Deworming Recommendations Council Heartworm

Letter to the editor

The role of companion animal parasite councils

Both the European Scientific Council of Companion Animal Parasites (ESCCAP) and the Companion Animal Parasite Council (CAPC) in the United States are independent, non-profit making organisations consisting of experts in the field of parasitology and public health from across Europe and the United States, respectively. Initially convened in 2002 (CAPC) and 2005 (ESCCAP), the role of these organisations is to develop recommendations for the optimal treatment and control of companion animal parasites with the aim of protecting the health of pets and the health of the public by reducing the risk of zoonotic parasite transmission. The websites comprehensively present the life cycles, diseases, diagnosis, control, prevalence and distribution maps of a wide variety of endoparasites and ectoparasites of dogs and cats. In so doing, the guidelines aim to increase awareness and educate practicing veterinarians and public health professionals of the most relevant parasites within each region and provide guidance for specific best-practice procedures to protect pets and the public from parasitic infections. For the majority of globally distributed parasites that the recommendations for the geographic regions CAPC and ESCCAP represent, there is overlap, owing to commonalities in mode of transmission and risks of exposure of the respective parasites to pets and humans. For others that are restricted geographically, for example the trematode Nanophyetus salmincola in the Pacific Northwest of the United States and Canada and Heterobilharzia americana, the cause of canine schistosomiasis in south-eastern United States, information and guidelines are highly region-specific. Whenever possible to do so, the guidelines put forward by experts of CAPC and ESCCAP are evidence-based, extracted from comprehensive well-resourced epidemiological and clinical-based studies and updated frequently to cover the latest research.

The “tropics” are unique

A plethora of arguments stand in favour of developing companion animal parasite prevention and best-practice guidelines for the regions spanning Southeast Asia, the Pacific Islands, Northern Australia, South Asia (including India), Latin America and Africa, otherwise known as the ‘tropics’, the geographical area between the Equator and the Tropics of Cancer and Capricorn. The region is predominantly characterised by hot, humid weather, but also includes other climatic zones, namely the seasonally dry tropics, mountainous and less commonly, arid zones. These climatic conditions support a diverse range of pathogens and vectors of medical and veterinary importance, whose transmission and geographical distribution are closely linked to regional temperature, rainfall, humidity and soil type. The wet tropics in particular, favour an unrivalled animal and plant biodiversity. The high burden of disease transmission is exacerbated by the fact that despite varied economic, political and social histories, almost all of the tropical countries remain underdeveloped with the majority being classified as low to middle income countries by The World Bank (http://data.worldbank.org/about/country-and-lending-groups). Transmission of parasites is therefore particularly high in these less-industrialized nations. In addition, the demographics of dog and cat populations in these respective regions and countries are far from being comparable to Europe or North America. The co-existence of true companion animals with semi-domesticated and stray animals alike, contribute to the challenge of parasite control programmes. Veterinary awareness and treatment of animals may be lacking and environmental and sanitary conditions conducive for their transmission [1, 2]. Many canine and feline parasites are also important zoonoses including species of Toxocara, Ancylostoma and Echinococcus. The diseases caused by these parasites are recognised by the WHO/FAO/OIE as ‘neglected zoonotic diseases’ that form under the umbrella of ‘neglected tropical diseases’ (WHO, http://www.who.int/neglected_diseases/en). Their strategic control requires the application of integrated, multidisciplinary input involving both veterinarians as well as public health practitioners. The term “neglected” highlights diseases that affect mainly poor and marginalised populations in low-resource settings that receive little attention in terms of investment in research towards their surveillance, treatment and control [3].

For example, the higher infection pressure of parasites within the tropics, as distinct from cooler climes, can be demonstrated using Toxocara spp. (a globally prevalent parasite). Toxocariasis is an important zoonosis that may manifest as visceral larva migrans, ocular larva migrans, or as non-specific, mild symptoms referred to as ‘covert’ or ‘common’ toxocariasis. Toxocariasis has been shown through seroprevalence studies to be especially prevalent among children from socio-economically disadvantaged populations [4], especially those within the tropics [5]. Seroprevalence of toxocariasis among children has been reported at 33 % in Kashmir, India [6]; 49 % in the Philippines [7]; between 15.5 and 17.8 % in Brazil [8, 9] and as high as 47.5 % among populations in Colombia [10]. This is in contrast to seroprevalence rates of 2.4 % in Denmark [11], 6.6 % in Austria [12], 0–4.2 % in children in Spain [13] and 8.6 to 13.9 % in the United States [14]. Toxocara eggs are capable of surviving for several years in optimal environments [15] and therefore high concentrations of infective stages are likely to build up in any area frequented by patent-parasitized dogs. Uncontrolled and untreated dog and cat populations coupled with poor sanitation can lead to heavily contaminated environments. Warm climatic conditions provide ideal transmission opportunities, not only to the occasionally-walked apartment-dwelling dog, but more importantly to the child that shares the animals’ environment.

Region-specific parasites begets region-specific knowledge

For other parasites, that are more restricted in distribution, knowledge about their impact as an agent of veterinary or human disease relies largely on local research and knowledge. The prevalence of these parasites may depend solely on the distribution of region-specific intermediate hosts (vectors) or be strongly influenced by sylvatic factors or anthroponotic behaviours and therefore necessitate more specific guidelines for their diagnosis and control. For example, in areas where Dioctophyme renale, the giant kidney worm of dogs is endemic (including South America, China and parts of Southeast Asia), patients may not be appropriately diagnosed or treated if veterinarians fail to consider the parasite as a differential cause of chronic dysuria and haematuria and occasionally, peritonitis. In Southeast Asia, control of Clonorchis sinensis and Opsithorchis viverrine relies on educating owners not to provide their animal access to raw fish. For others, differences in pre-patent period may also have important implications on timing of anthelmintic administration. Ancylostoma ceylanicum for example, has emerged as the dominant species of hookworm infecting dogs and cats in the Asia Pacific region with a reported prevalence of between 35 and 72 % in India [16, 17], 92 % in Thailand [18], 52 % in Malaysia [19], 69–77 % in Laos [20, 21], and over 90 % in dogs in Cambodia [22]. In addition to causing anaemia in dogs, this hookworm species is recognised as an important emerging zoonosis [22]. A specific feature of the biology of A. ceylanicum in dogs and cats is its relatively short pre-patent period of only 14 days compared with other major helminths [23]. In heavily contaminated environments, anthelmintics with pure adulticidal activity administered at frequencies of any greater than once every three months, as currently recommended on most such products in Asia, will ultimately fail to have a significant effect on environmental hookworm burdens, the frequency of re-infection and therefore the level of morbidity in the animal (as well as in humans).

The importance of distinguishing Dirofilaria immitis from the relatively benign subcutaneous nodule worm, Dirofilaria repens in areas where these filarial worms are co-endemic is critical for companion animal veterinarians. For example, in Vietnam, northern India and Thailand, veterinarians must be vigilant in their choice of antigen test kit for detecting heartworm infection and with correctly identifying microfilaria in blood films; and combining these with the individual’s clinical presentation and ancillary test results, prior to making a definitive diagnosis of heartworm disease. Furthermore, in many of these heartworm-endemic countries (e.g., Malaysia, Brazil and Vietnam), the compound melarsomine (registered as an adulticide), is either unavailable or rarely utilised as part of the heartworm treatment regime. Instead, ‘slow kill’, using macrocyclic lactones only, a method strongly discouraged by the American Heartworm Society (https://heartwormsociety.org), is routinely practiced throughout the tropics. “Slow kill” is not only ineffective, but leads to the selection of macrocyclic lactone resistant sub-populations of heartworms [24].

Changing trend of companion animal ownership

Companion animal populations can be divided into two major categories - pets (owned and supervised) and strays. Strays may be further classified according to their dependence on humans, namely unowned free-roaming (abandoned and feral), and owned free-roaming (community dogs) [25]. In the United States and the majority of Europe, legislation promoting responsible pet ownership assures that the majority of companion animals are indeed ‘pets’. In Europe and the United States there is one dog or cat to every 3 to 4 households (https://www.avma.org, 2012; http://www.fediaf.org, 2010). In contrast, three quarters of the dog population in developing regions of the tropics may be classified as stray or free-roaming community dogs. These may equate to as high as 1 dog to 5 people in Kathmandu, Nepal and Bali, Indonesia; 1 dog to 4 people in the Philippines and Bolivia and 1 dog to 3 people in rural Mexico [26]. These animals contaminate the environment with excreta that are a source of parasite eggs and larvae capable of infecting pet dogs and humans. In recent years however, dog ownership rates in these now developing economies are on the rise, as are rapid changes in the nature of companion animal ownership [27]. For example, India has one of the world’s lowest rates of dog ownership: 4 dogs per 1,000 people, however, in the last 5 years, dog ownership rates have more than doubled (+58 %) with an estimated pet dog population of 10 million, the fastest growth rate of the 53 countries surveyed (http://www.euromonitor.com/pet-care, 2014). Similar trends were recorded for the Philippines (+38 %), Venezuela (+30 %), Argentina (+20 %) and Brazil (+14.3 %). In these regions, the rapidly urbanising middle class appear to be working more, earning more and living in city apartments sharing close relationships with pet dogs. The close human-animal bond has undoubted mental and physical benefits [2], however, these come at a potential cost of acquiring parasitic zoonoses.

The role and knowledge of veterinarians on the importance of parasite prevention

The benefits of economic growth and affluence also place an increasingly higher expectation and demand on veterinary practitioners by animal owners for improved standards of service in healthcare for their pets, and protection of their family from acquiring zoonoses. In developing nations, veterinarians are deemed at the forefront when managing the risk of zoonotic diseases [28]. The profession has an ethical and legal professional duty of care to diagnose and prevent zoonotic diseases in animals as well as to refer a pet owner to a physician if potential risk of zoonotic disease transmission exists [29], and this responsibility extends to the provision of advice about parasite prevention.

Recently, region-specific guidelines for immunization of dogs and cats were published by the World Small Animal Veterinary Association Vaccination Guideline Group [30]. The report highlighted unique challenges faced by companion animal practitioners in Asia, which included insufficient resources for research, training and diagnosis into small animal infectious diseases and limited awareness of veterinarians on global trends on small animal vaccinology. Practicing veterinarians in the tropics are likely to face similar challenges with regard to their ability to accurately diagnose, treat and control companion animal parasites. For example, in the United States, Europe and Australia, veterinarians follow guidelines outlined by CAPC and ESCCAP, for the control of hookworm and Toxocara spp. in puppies, which consists of de-worming with appropriate anthelmintics at 2 weekly intervals until 8 weeks of age, and monthly thereafter. These recommended ‘intervals’ vary according to country. For instance, in Vietnam, Philippines and Malaysia veterinarians often de-worm puppies at 4, 8 and 12 weeks of age, followed by 2 to 4 times annually. Recommended de-worming intervals also vary according to local manufacturers’ guidelines, the perceived ‘risk’ of parasite infection by the veterinarian, their knowledge of the parasite’s life cycle and its clinical and zoonotic significance. In much of the tropics, resources to fund studies to address these issues are limited. Nevertheless, the past decade has seen a moderate increase in the published literature of research associated with companion animal parasites in tropical countries. Much of this has been focused on the surveillance and control of diseases that are zoonotic (e.g., echinococcosis, rabies, toxocariasis), rather than aiming to improve health standards of the animals themselves. There is, therefore, a significant gap in our knowledge about the significance and distribution of clinically important parasitic diseases of dogs and cats in much of the tropics. Furthermore, the average veterinarian’s ability to access relevant and up-to-date information about these diseases for their region is also a major factor that limits their ability to translate the research into everyday practice.

The combination of warmer climate, enhanced parasite life cycles, poor environmental sanitation and higher environmental contamination rates lead to significantly increased infection pressure for all animals and potentially pose a serious risk to the public. This risk extends to pets that are inadequately treated as puppies and adults, even if ‘occasionally’ walked outdoors. It is the opinion of the authors that there needs to be questions raised about the appropriateness of ‘standard’ parasite prevention protocols currently advocated by most companion animal clinicians in the tropics and a paradigm shift in the thinking of veterinarians with regard to treating dogs and cats.

Towards a solution

We propose formation of the Companion Animal Parasites Council for the Tropics (CAPCT). The CAPCT will consist of regional (e.g. Asia-Pacific, Latin America and Caribbean, Africa) experts comprising academic veterinarians, parasitologists, physicians and allied industry partners that will work together to inform, guide and make best-practice recommendations for the diagnosis, treatment and control of companion animal parasites in the tropics, with the aim of protecting animal and human health. The organization will seek input through close collaboration with the practicing veterinarians, medical and public health professions, regional government and non-for-profit bodies. In addition to biannual meetings, the Council will organize veterinary and public outreach events in each region to facilitate transfer of knowledge through local lectures, workshops, symposia within local conferences and webinars to primary stakeholders such as veterinarians and breeders. General and region-specific recommendations for the treatment and control of companion animal parasites will be developed and made available through a dedicated, freely accessible website.

Abbreviations

CAPCT: 

Companion Animal parasites Council for the Tropics

CAPC: 

Companion Animal Parasite Council

ESCCAP: 

European Scientific Council of Companion Animal Parasites

OIE: 

World Organisation for Animal Health

FAO: 

Food Agricultural Organisation

WHO: 

World Health Organisation

Declarations

Acknowledgements

We thank Bayer Animal Health for supporting the CAPCT initiative and this publication.

Authors’ Affiliations

(1)
The Faculty of Veterinary and Agricultural Sciences, The University of Melbourne
(2)
College of Veterinary Medicine, School of Veterinary and Life Sciences, Murdoch University
(3)
Department of Immunology, Centro de Pesquisas Aggeu Magalhães, Fundação Oswaldo Cruz
(4)
Department of Veterinary Medicine, University of Bari
(5)
Hospital Veterinario de Virreyes and Enfermedades Parasitarias, Universidad de Buenos Aires
(6)
Programa Institucional Biodiversidade e Saúde, Fundação Oswaldo Cruz
(7)
Department of Parasitology, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Kasetsart University
(8)
Department Veterinary Parasitology, Bombay Veterinary College, Maharashtra Animal and Fishery Sciences University
(9)
Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Vietnam National University of Agriculture
(10)
Department of Veterinary Tropical Diseases, Faculty of Veterinary Science, University of Pretoria
(11)
Department of Companion Animal Medicine and Surgery, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Universiti Putra Malaysia
(12)
Bayer Animal Health GmbH

References

  1. Traub RJ, Robertson ID, Irwin PJ, Mencke N, Thompson RC. Canine gastrointestinal parasitic zoonoses in India. Trends Parasitol. 2005;21:42–8.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. Beetz A, Julius H, Turner D, Kotrschal K. Effects of social support by a dog on stress modulation in male children with insecure attachment. Front Psychol. 2012;3:352.PubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. Mueller-Langer F. Neglected infectious diseases: are push and pull incentive mechanisms suitable for promoting drug development research? Health Econ Policy Law. 2013;8:185–208.View ArticlePubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. Lee RM, Moore LB, Bottazzi ME, Hotez PJ. Toxocariasis in North America: a systematic review. PLoS Negl Trop Dis. 2014;8:e3116.View ArticlePubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. Bolivar-Mejia A, Alarcón-Olave C, C-B LS, P-M A, Delgado O, Rodriguez-Morales A. Toxocariasis in the Americas: burden and disease control. Curr Trop Med Rep. 2014;1:62–8.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  6. Dar ZA, Tanveer S, Yattoo GN, Sofi BA, Dar PA, Wani SA. Presence of anti-Toxocara antibodies in children population of district Anantnag and Pulwama of Kashmir valley. IIndian J Med Microbiol. 2008;26:400–2.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  7. Fajutag AJM, Paller VGV. Toxocara egg soil contamination and its seroprevalence among public school children in Los Baños, Laguna, Philippines. Southeast Asian J Trop Med Public Health. 2013;44:551–60.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. Cassenote AJ, Lima AR, Pinto Neto JM, Rubinsky-Elefant G. Seroprevalence and modifiable risk factors for Toxocara spp. in Brazilian schoolchildren. PLoS Negl Trop Dis. 2014;8:e2830.View ArticlePubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. Manini MP, Marchioro AA, Colli CM, Nishi L, Falavigna-Guilherme AL. Association between contamination of public squares and seropositivity for Toxocara spp. in children. Vet Parasitol. 2012;188:48–52.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. Agudelo C, Villareal E, Caceres E, Lopez C, Eljach J, Ramirez N, et al. Human and dogs Toxocara canis infection in a poor neighborhood in Bogota. Mem Inst Oswaldo Cruz. 1990;85:75–8.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. Stensvold CR, Skov J, Moller LN, Jensen PM, Kapel CM, Petersen E, et al. Seroprevalence of human toxocariasis in Denmark. Clin Vaccine Immunol. 2009;16:1372–3.View ArticlePubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. Zacharasiewicz A, Auer H, Brath H, Stohlhofer B, Frank W, Aspock H, et al. [Toxocara and bronchial hyperreactivity–results of a seroprevalence study]. Wiener klinische Wochenschrift. 2000;112:922–6.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. Fenoy S, Cuellar C, Guillen JL. Seroprevalence of toxocariasis in children and adults in Madrid and Tenerife, Spain. J Helminthol. 1996;70:109–13.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. Won KY, Kruszon-Moran D, Schantz PM, Jones JL. National seroprevalence and risk factors for Zoonotic Toxocara spp. infection. Am J Trop Med Hyg. 2008;79:552–7.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. Fisher MA, Deplazes P. Special issue: ESCCAP - Toxocara 2012. Introduction. Vet Parasitol. 2013;193:325–6.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. Traub RJ, Pednekar RP, Cuttell L, Porter RB, Abd Megat Rani PA, Gatne ML. The prevalence and distribution of gastrointestinal parasites of stray and refuge dogs in four locations in India. Vet Parasitol. 2014;205:233–8.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. Traub RJ, Robertson ID, Irwin P, Mencke N, Thompson RC. Application of a species-specific PCR-RFLP to identify Ancylostoma eggs directly from canine faeces. Vet Parasitol. 2004;123:245–55.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. Traub RJ, Inpankaew T, Sutthikornchai C, Sukthana Y, Thompson RC. PCR-based coprodiagnostic tools reveal dogs as reservoirs of zoonotic ancylostomiasis caused by Ancylostoma ceylanicum in temple communities in Bangkok. Vet Parasitol. 2008;155:67–73.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. Ngui R, Lim YA, Traub R, Mahmud R, Mistam MS. Epidemiological and genetic data supporting the transmission of Ancylostoma ceylanicum among human and domestic animals. PLoS Negl Trop Dis. 2012;6:e1522.View ArticlePubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. Conlan JV, Khamlome B, Vongxay K, Elliot A, Pallant L, Sripa B, et al. Soil-transmitted helminthiasis in Laos: a community-wide cross-sectional study of humans and dogs in a mass drug administration environment. Am J Trop Med Hyg. 2012;86:624–34.View ArticlePubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. Scholz T, Uhlirova M, Ditrich O. Helminth parasites of cats from the Vientiane province, Laos, as indicators of the occurrence of causative agents of human parasitoses. Parasite. 2003;10:343–50.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. Inpankaew T, Schar F, Dalsgaard A, Khieu V, Chimnoi W, Chhoun C, et al. High prevalence of Ancylostoma ceylanicum hookworm infections in humans, Cambodia, 2012. Emerg Infect Dis. 2014;20:976–82.View ArticlePubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. Yoshida Y, Kondo K, Kurimoto H, Fukutome S, Shirasaka S. Comparative studies on Ancylostoma braziliense and Ancylostoma ceylanicum. 3. Life history in the definitive host. J Parasitol. 1974;60:636–41.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. Bowman DD, Mannella C. Macrocyclic lactones and Dirofilaria immitis microfilariae. Top Companion Anim Med. 2011;26(4):160–72.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  25. OIE Working Group on Animal Welfare. CHAPTER 7.7. Guidelines on Stray Dog Population Control: Report of the eighth meeting of the OIE Working Group on Animal Welfare. France: World Organisation for Animal Health (OIE); 2009.Google Scholar
  26. Jackman J, Rowan A. Free-Roaming Dogs in Developing Countries: The Benefits of Capture, Neuter, and Return Programs. In: Salem DJ, Rowan A, editors. The state of the animals. Washington, DC: Humane Society Press; 2007. p. 55–78.Google Scholar
  27. Dantas-Torres F, Otranto D. Dogs, cats, parasites, and humans in Brazil: opening the black box. Parasit Vectors. 2014;7:22.View ArticlePubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  28. Irwin PJ. It shouldn’t happen to a dog - or a veterinarian: clinical paradigms for canine vector-borne diseases. Trends Parasitol. 2014;30:104–12.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  29. Marsh AE, Babcock S. Legal implications of zoonotic disease transmission for veterinary practices. Vet Clin North Am Small Anim Pract. 2015;45:393–408.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  30. Day MJ, Karkare U, Schultz RD, Squires R, Tsujimoto H. Recommendations on vaccination for Asian small animal practitioners: a report of the WSAVA Vaccination Guidelines Group. J Small Anim Pract. 2015;56:77–95.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright

© Traub et al.; licensee BioMed Central. 2015

This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0) which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly credited. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.

Comments

By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.

Advertisement