Open Access

Host-feeding behaviour of Dermacentor reticulatus and Dermacentor marginatus in mono-specific and inter-specific infestations

  • Alicja Buczek1Email author,
  • Katarzyna Bartosik1,
  • Zbigniew Zając1 and
  • Michał Stanko2, 3
Parasites & Vectors20158:470

https://doi.org/10.1186/s13071-015-1078-9

Received: 14 July 2015

Accepted: 9 September 2015

Published: 17 September 2015

Abstract

Background

Given the sympatric occurrence in some regions of Europe and the great epidemiological significance of D. reticulatus and D. marginatus species, we investigated the behaviour of these ticks during inter-specific and mono-specific host infestations.

Findings

The investigations were conducted on rabbits at 20 ± 3 °C and humidity of 38 ± 1 %. The inter-specific infestations groups consisted of 20 females and ten males of D. marginatus and 20 females and ten males of D. reticulatus on each host, whereas mono-specific infestations involved 40 females and 20 males of each species.

The investigations have demonstrated competition between the two tick species resulting in modification of the behaviour on the host and the feeding course in D. marginatus females by the presence of D. reticulatus. In the inter-specific group, D. marginatus females attached for a longer time (mean 2.74 ± 1.12 h) than in the mono-specific group (mean 1.24 ± 0.97 h) (p < 0.0001). The feeding period of these females was shorter (9.45 ± 1.30 days) than in the mono-specific group (13.15 ± 2.53 days) (p < 0.0001), but they exhibited a statistically significantly higher body weight in comparison with the females from the mono-specific infestation (p = 0.0155). In D. reticulatus females, no significant difference was found in the host attachment and feeding rates between the mono-specific and inter-specific groups.

Conclusions

The differences in the behaviour of the females from both species during co-feeding reflect physiological adaptation to environmental conditions, which enables them to ingest blood and reproduce. During co-feeding of D. reticulatus and D. marginatus on the same host, two inter-specific systems with different physiological features are formed, which may influence the transmission of tick-borne pathogens.

Keywords

Dermacentor reticulatus Dermacentor marginatus Host-feeding behaviour Co-feeding ticks

Background

Among the representatives of the genus Dermacentor recognized worldwide, two species, i.e. Dermacentor reticulatus (Fabricius, 1794) and Dermacentor marginatus (Sulzer, 1776), have a great epidemiological significance in Europe. The geographical ranges of these tick species are different, although in some regions of the southern and central part of the continent they may inhabit the same hygrophilic or xerophilic vegetation habitats depending on geographical location ([1, 2], Stanko, personal communications). Anthropopressure-induced environmental changes as well as climate changes may contribute to expansion of their occurrence range. Additionally, representatives of both tick species may be carried by migrating animals to areas inhabited by another species, where under favourable conditions, ticks can develop and attack a variety of animals.

D. reticulatus and D. marginatus ticks transmit numerous pathogens, e.g. Tick-Borne Encephalitis Virus, Omsk Hemorrhagic Fever Virus, Crimmean Congo Hemorrhagic Fever Virus, Rickettsia slovaca, Rickettsia raoultii, Rickettsia sibirica as well as Coxiella burnetii, Francisella spp., Bartonella spp., Anaplasma phagocytophilum, Anaplasma marginale and Babesia spp. thereby contributing to maintenance of foci of human and animal tick-borne diseases [1, 35]. Since both species parasitize the same domestic and wild-living animals ([1], Stanko, personal communications) and may infest humans [3, 6], pathogen transmission may proceed in various inter- and intra-specific systems. Hence, knowledge of the course of D. reticulatus and D. marginatus feeding on the same host has great epidemiological importance. Therefore, we investigated if, and in what ways, co-feeding may influence the parasitic phase of these species.

Findings

Methods

Tick hosts

The experiments were conducted on five tick-naive albino New Zealand rabbits (Oryctolagus cuniculus) with an average weight of 3–3.5 kg kept under standard laboratory conditions in accordance with the requirements specified by the ethics committee. Three animals were used for the study on D. reticulatus and D. marginatus ticks during a simultaneous infestation by inter-specific groups, and the other two rabbits were hosts in the examinations of a simultaneous mono-specific infestation of each of the tick species studied (control groups). The whole study was carried out in 2010.

Tick collection and rearing

Unengorged adult specimens of D. reticulatus were collected near Lublin in Poland and D. marginatus were found near Zádel in Slovakia during the spring activity peak. The common flagging method used consisted in sweeping the vegetation with a 1 m2 flannel cloth. In the laboratory, the sampled ticks were identified to species and gender using the keys of Siuda [1], and next transferred from glass transport containers to rearing chambers, in which 80 % humidity and temperature of 25 °C were maintained for D reticulatus, and 80 % humidity and 28 °C for D. marginatus. Such conditions had proved favourable for maintaining adult forms of the aforementioned ticks in previous investigations ([5], unpublished observations). Constant humidity values of 80 % were maintained using a saturated KNO3 solution in accordance with the method developed by Winston and Bates [7]. The experiments involved 100 females and 50 males of D. reticulatus, and 100 females and 50 males of D. marginatus.

In order to investigate the course of the parasitic phase, tick specimens were placed on rabbits’ back in a cloth bag attached to shaved skin, which prevented the parasites from spreading and ensured control over the experiment. Investigations of the rate of tick attachment and feeding were carried out at 20 ± 3 °C room temperature and 38 ± 1 % humidity.

Experimental groups

The dependencies between the tick species in the parasitic phase of the life cycle were investigated simultaneously in the following experimental groups:
  • infestations of two tick species (inter-specific infestations) - 20 females and 10 males of D. marginatus and 20 females and 10 males of D. reticulatus on each host,

  • infestations of one tick species (mono-specific infestations)- 40 females and 20 males of D. marginatus or D. reticulatus on each host.

Investigations of the rate of tick attachment and feeding

Prior to feeding, unfed D. marginatus and D. reticulatus ticks were weighed using an analytical balance with an accuracy of 0.0001 g. To distinguish between the species and gender of specimens, ticks were marked with different colours of oil markers. The behaviour of the ticks during the questing and attachment period was observed every 0.5 h until the time of strong attachment of their hypostomes to the host skin; after the beginning of feeding, the observations were held throughout the parasitic phase period at 24-h intervals at the same time of day. Immediately after the ticks detached from the host, engorged females were carefully collected from the host skin, weighed, and placed in rearing chambers.

Based on the results, the following parameters and indices of the parasitic phase were determined: attachment dynamics- percentage of specimens attached to host skin in a specified time, attachment period (AP), feeding period (FP), and female engorgement weight (FEW) defined in a previous paper by Buczek et al. [8].

Statistics

The Mann–Whitney U test was used in order to check whether there were significant differences in the parameter values between the species mono-specific and inter-specific groups. The calculations were completed in Statistica 5 PL and Microsoft Excel XP programmes.

Ethical approval

The study was performed with the full approval of Commission for Animal Experiments (ethical approval no 41/2006).

Results

In the experimental conditions of temperature and humidity, D. reticulatus females attached to the skin within 0.5- 5 h after being placed on the rabbits (Table 1). No significant (p = 0.9898) difference was found in the length of the skin attachment period between D. reticulatus females in the mono-specific and inter-specific species groups.
Table 1

Parameters of the parasitic phase in Dermacentor reticulatus and Dermacentor marginatus females feeding on rabbits in mono-specific and inter-specific groups at 20 ± 3 °C and 38 ± 1 % RH

Species

Variable

Group

M

SD

Min.

Max.

Mann–Whitney U test

Dermacentor reticulatus

AP

mono-specific

2.60

1.43

0.50

5.00

0.9808

inter-specific

2.66

0.98

0.50

4.50

FP

mono-specific

10.05

0.88

8.00

11.00

0.1202

inter-specific

9.63

1.55

8.00

12.00

FEW

mono-specific

0.41

0.06

0.31

0.53

0.8361

inter-specific

0.42

0.06

0.32

0.55

Dermacentor marginatus

AP

mono-specific

1.21

0.97

0.50

5.00

<0.0001

inter-specific

2.74

1.12

0.50

4.50

FP

mono-specific

13.15

2.53

10.00

17.00

<0.0001

inter-specific

9.45

1.30

8.00

12.00

FEW

mono-specific

0.57

0.13

0.38

0.87

0.0155

inter-specific

0.65

0.14

0.40

0.89

M mean, SD standard deviation, AP attachment period (h), FP feeding period (days), FEW female engorged weight (g)

The number of females that began feeding increased with the duration of the experiments; the largest numbers attached to rabbit skin within 1 – 3.5 h after being transferred on the host (Fig. 1a, b). The feeding dynamics differed between the mono-specific and inter-specific groups of D. reticulatus females (Fig. 1a). D. reticulatus females ingested blood longer exclusively in the presence of specimens from this species. When D. marginatus females were co-feeding with them, the mean length of the feeding period was shorter by 8.28 %. However, the length of the feeding period in both female groups, 10.5 ± 0.88 and 9.63 ± 1.55 days on average (Table 1), was not statistically significant (p = 0.1202). Similarly, the female engorgement weight did not differ significantly (p = 0.8361) between the homogenous and inter-specific groups of D. reticulatus ticks.
Fig. 1

Dynamics of tick attachment to rabbit skin in the mono-specific and inter-specific species group; a Dermacentor reticulatus and b Dermacentor marginatus, at 20 ± 3 °C and 38 ± 1 % RH

In turn, the feeding parameters in D. marginatus varied when adult stages of D. reticulatus parasitized the same host. In the inter-specific group, D. marginatus females attached within a longer time (mean 2.74 ± 1.12 h) than in the mono-specific group (mean 1.24 ± 0.97 h) (Fig. 1b). These differences were statistically significant (p < 0.0001). Similarly, the length of the feeding period exhibited statistically significant differences (p < 0.0001) between the groups. The feeding period in the case of D. marginatus females was longer in the homogenous (13.15 ± 2.53 days) than the inter-specific group (9.45 ± 1.30 days). D. marginatus females co-feeding in the inter-specific group with D. reticulatus specimens displayed higher body weight than in the mono-specific group (Table 1). The difference was statistically significant (p = 0.0155) in both groups.

Discussion

Multiple environmental factors, primarily temperature [9] and photoperiod [10] as well as the physiological features of the host exert an effect on the course of tick attachment and feeding [11, 12]. Our studies have demonstrated that the presence of specimens of one species on the same host may affect the behaviour of representatives of another species. In D. marginatus females, competition with the other species led to a decreased rate of attachment to host skin and a shortened period of blood ingestion. However, feeding exhibited by the females from this species was more intensive than that displayed by the co-feeding D. reticulatus females. This type of behaviour reflects physiological adaptation of D. marginatus to conditions of limited access to the food source. Co-parasitism of various tick species on the same animals [13] and humans [14] has been reported in natural conditions. In Spain, 9 % of 3685 patients infested by ticks were attacked by two or a greater number of species [14].

Mating of Metastriata representatives takes place on the host; therefore, the prolonged period of attachment and the shortened feeding period in females of one species may constitute a biological barrier, efficiently preventing inter-specific crosses between ticks feeding on the same host. In the case of D. marginatus and D. reticulatus, the negative attempts at crossing the two species as well as results of molecular analysis have revealed their reproductive isolation [15]. Nevertheless, D. marginatus specimens with phenotypic traits of D. reticulatus have been found [16]. Furthermore, crosses between tick species from the genera Dermacentor yielded hybrids that were either unable to reproduce or were characterized by reduced survival [17].

Tick attachment is modified by aggregation-attachment pheromones (APP) released by other specimens feeding on the same host [18]. No investigations have been carried out on pheromones in D. reticulatus and D. marginatus, but differences in the response to the substances contained therein have been reported in other tick species [18]. In our experiments, we observed attachment of females and males from both D. reticulatus and D. marginatus species at a close distance to each other.

The differences in the feeding course in the tick species observed both in the mono-specific and inter-specific groups might be associated with the polymorphism of the proteins secreted by tick salivary glands [19]. Quantitative and qualitative differences in the composition of saliva of the particular tick species may stimulate different immune mechanisms in the host during the different phases of tick feeding.

Tick saliva contains many protein and lipid substances with a broad spectrum of pharmacological activity, which play an important role not only in the process of tick feeding, but also in the process of pathogen transmission by affecting the host immune system [20, 21].

The course of the parasitic phase in the ticks observed in our experiments was affected by the fact that the adult stages were feeding in aggregations, thus causing macroscopically visible lesions in the host skin. Severe cytological lesions and accumulation of inflammatory cells appeared in the histopathological image of skin sampled from the D. reticulatus feeding site [22], which, consequently, altered the composition of tick meal. Studies on the feeding course of Rhipicephalus appendiculatus species showed that the attachment and feeding rates were increased and the period of searching for a mate decreased during infestation with many specimens, compared with experiments with single tick pairs on the host [23]. Modification of feeding in one species induced by the presence of another species may lead to an increased rate of pathogen transmission, including saliva-activated transmission (SAT) [24], both in the inter-specific (tick-host) and intra-specific (tick-tick) systems. According to Richter et al. [25], the risk of infection with Borrelia spirochetes is six-fold greater when ticks co-feed with other infected specimens.

Declarations

Acknowledgments

We are grateful to Anna Zon for the language editing of the manuscript.

Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.

Authors’ Affiliations

(1)
Chair and Department of Biology and Parasitology, Medical University of Lublin
(2)
Institute of Parasitology, Slovak Academy of Sciences
(3)
Institute of Zoology, Slovak Academy of Sciences

References

  1. Siuda K. Ticks of Poland. Part II, Systematics and Distribution. Warsaw: PTP; 1993 (in Polish).Google Scholar
  2. Bursali A, Keskin A, Tekin S. Ticks (Acari: Ixodida) infesting humans in the provinces of Kelkit Valley, a Crimean-Congo Hemorrhagic Fever endemic region in Turkey. Exp Appl Acarol. 2013;59:507–15.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. Földvári G, Rigó K, Lakos A. Transmission of Rickettsia slovaca and Rickettsia raoultii by male Dermacentor marginatus and Dermacentor reticulatus ticks to humans. Diagn Microbiol Infect Dis. 2013;76:387–9.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. Bonnet S, de la Fuente J, Nicollet P, Liu X, Madani N, Blanchard B, et al. Prevalence of tick-borne pathogens in adult Dermacentor spp. ticks from nine collection sites in France. Vector Borne Zoonotic Dis. 2013;13:226–36.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. Šimo L, Kocáková P, Sláviková M, Kubeš M, Hajnická V, Vančová I, et al. Dermacentor reticulatus (Acari, Ixodidae) female feeding in laboratory. Biologia, Bratislava. 2004;59:655–60.Google Scholar
  6. Bursali A, Tekin S, Orhan M, Keskin A, Ozkan M. Ixodid ticks (Acari: Ixodidae) infesting humans in Tokat Province of Turkey: species diversity and seasonal activity. J Vector Ecol. 2010;35:180–6.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. Winston PH, Bates DH. Saturated solutions for control of humidity in biological research. Ecology. 1960;41:232–7.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  8. Buczek A, Lachowska-Kotowska P, Bartosik K. The effect of synthetic pyrethroids on the attachment and host-feeding behaviour in Dermacentor reticulatus females (Ixodida: Amblyommidae). Parasit Vectors. 2015;8:366.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. Lees AD. The behaviour and physiology of ticks. Acarologia. 1969;11:397–406.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. Belozerov VN. Diapause and biological rhythms in ticks. In: Obenchain F, Galun R, editors. Physiology of ticks. Oxford: Pergamon Press; 1982. p. 469–500.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  11. Carroll JF. How specific are host-produced kairomones to host-seeking ixodid ticks? Exp Appl Acarol. 2002;28:155–61.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. Bartosik K, Buczek A. The impact of intensity of invasion of Ixodes ricinus and Dermacentor reticulatus on the course of the parasitic phase. Ann Agric Environ Med. 2012;19:651–5.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. Paulauskas A, Radzijevskaja J, Rosef O, Turcinaviciene J, Ambrasiene D. Infestation of mice and voles with Ixodes ricinus ticks in Lithuania and Norway. Est J Ecol. 2009;58:112–25.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  14. Fernández-Soto P, Pérez-Sánchez R, Encinas-Grandes A, Alamo SR. Rickettsia slovaca in Dermacentor ticks found on humans in Spain. Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis. 2006;25:129–31.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. Zahler M, Gothe R. Evidence for the reproductive isolation of Dermacentor marginatus and Dermacentor reticulatus (Acari: Ixodidae) ticks based on cross-breeding, morphology and molecular studies. Exp Appl Acarol. 1997;21:685–96.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. Estrada-Peña A, Estrada-Peña R. Notes on Dermacentor (Acari: Ixodidae) ticks (IV): morphological covariation of D. marginatus (Sulzer). Acarologia. 1992;33:245–59.Google Scholar
  17. Oliver JH, Wilkinson PR, Kohls GM. Observations on hybridization of three species of North American Dermacentor ticks. J Parasitol. 1972;58:380–4.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. Sonenshine DE. Biology of ticks, vol. 1. UK: Oxford Univ. Press; 1991.Google Scholar
  19. Kazimírová M, Štibrániová I. Tick salivary compounds: their role in modulation of host defences and pathogen transmission. Front Cell Infect Microbiol. 2013;3:43.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. Hajnicka V, Kocakova P, Slovak M, Labuda M, Fuchsberger N, Nuttall P. Inhibition of the antiviral action of interferon by tick salivary gland extract. Parasite Immunol. 2000;22:201–6.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. Poole NM, Mamidanna G, Smith RA, Coons LB, Cole JA. Prostaglandin E2 in tick saliva regulates macrophage cell migration and cytokine profile. Parasit Vectors. 2013;6:261.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. Buczek A, Kuśmierz A, Olszewski K, Buczek L, Czerny K, Lańcut M. Comparison of rabbit skin changes after feeding of Ixodes ricinus (L.) and Dermacentor reticulatus (Fabr.). In: Bernini F, Nannelli R, Nuzzaci G, de Lillo E, editors. Acarid phylogeny and evolution, adaptation in mites and ticks. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers; 2002. p. 419–24.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  23. Wang H, Hails RS, Cui WW, Nuttall PA. Feeding aggregation of the tick Rhipicephalus appendiculatus (Ixodidae): benefits and cost in the contest with host responses. Parasitology. 2001;123:447–53.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. Jones LD, Matthewson M, Nuttall PA. Saliva-activated transmission (SAT) of Thogoto virus: dynamics of SAT factor activity in the salivary glands of Rhipicephalus appendiculatus, Amblyomma variegatum, and Boophilus microplus ticks. Exp Appl Acarol. 1992;13:241–8.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  25. Richter D, Allgöwer R, Matuschka FR. Co-feeding transmission and its contribution to the perpetuation of the Lyme disease spirochete Borrelia afzelii. Emerg Infect Dis. 2002;8:1421–5.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright

© Buczek et al. 2015

Comments

By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.

Advertisement