Open Access

High prevalence of trypanosomes in European badgers detected using ITS-PCR

  • Eze J. Ideozu1,
  • Andrew M. Whiteoak1,
  • Alexandra J. Tomlinson2,
  • Andrew Robertson2, 3,
  • Richard J. Delahay2 and
  • Geoff Hide1, 4Email author
Parasites & Vectors20158:480

https://doi.org/10.1186/s13071-015-1088-7

Received: 16 June 2015

Accepted: 11 September 2015

Published: 22 September 2015

Abstract

Background

Wildlife can be important sources and reservoirs for pathogens. Trypanosome infections are common in many mammalian species, and are pathogenic in some. Molecular detection tools were used to measure trypanosome prevalence in a well-studied population of wild European badgers (Meles meles).

Findings

A nested ITS-PCR system, that targeted the ribosomal RNA gene locus, has been widely used to detect pathogenic human and animal trypanosomes in domestic animals in Africa and some wildlife hosts. Samples from a long-term DEFRA funded capture-mark-recapture study of wild badgers at Woodchester Park (Gloucestershire, SW England) were investigated for trypanosome prevalence. A total of 82 badger blood samples were examined by nested ITS-PCR. Twenty-nine of the samples were found to be positive for trypanosomes giving a prevalence of 35.4 % (25.9 % - 46.2 %; 95 % CI). Infection was not found to be linked to badger condition, sex or age. Analysis of DNA sequence data showed the badgers to be infected with Trypanosoma (Megatrypanum) pestanai and phylogenetic analysis showed the Woodchester badger trypanosomes and T. pestanai to cluster in the Megatrypanum clade.

Conclusions

The results show that the ITS Nested PCR is an effective tool for diagnosing trypanosome infection in badgers and suggests that it could be widely used in wildlife species with unknown trypanosomes or mixed infections. The relatively high prevalence observed in these badgers raises the possibility that a significant proportion of UK badgers are naturally infected with trypanosomes.

Keywords

Trypanosoma Badger Meles meles PCR Ribosomal RNA genes ITS-PCR

Findings

Background

Trypanosomes are blood parasites of vertebrates with several species being agents of disease in humans and/or animal populations [1]. They are found globally, including the UK, and infect a wide range of species. To date, a variety of trypanosome species have been detected in British fauna, with most being from the subgenera Herpetosoma and Megatrypanum [2].

The European badger (Meles meles) is a widespread and common wild mammal in the UK. Studies conducted on British badgers in Cornwall [3] and Wytham Woods, Oxfordshire [2, 4] have shown them to be infected with Trypanosoma (Megatrypanum) pestanai but knowledge about infection of badgers with trypanosomes in other geographical areas is sparse. To date, the only study using molecular tools for the determination of prevalence of infection has been the Wytham Woods study that used an 18S gene PCR to determine the prevalence of T. pestanai as 31 % in the badger population [2]. Although, there are many molecular methods useful for the detection of trypanosomes [5] in humans and domestic animals, one method that can be used on a wide range of trypanosome species is the Internal Transcribed Spacer (ITS) Nested PCR based on generic trypanosome primers [68]. The technique is capable of distinguishing between various species of trypanosomes by amplification of the variable length Internal Transcribed Spacer region of ribosomal RNA and producing unique band sizes for each species/subspecies of trypanosome. The absence of DNA sequence data for the full ITS-rRNA in the databases for many trypanosome species of wildlife limits in silico approaches to determining ITS-Spacer size for many trypanosome species. 18S rRNA sequence data and concatenation of 18S and GAPDH sequences have been widely used for phylogenetic analysis [1, 911], but little is known about the phylogenies of trypanosomes generated using 28S rRNA genes. This is partly due to the lack of availability of many trypanosome 28S rRNA sequences including that of Trypanosoma pestanai.

The primary objective of this study was to investigate the prevalence of trypanosome infections using the ITS Nested-PCR on blood samples from badgers in the well-studied population at Woodchester Park in Gloucestershire. A secondary objective was to derive the 28S rRNA sequence from T. pestanai and apply molecular phylogenetic analyses using this marker to compare with the 18S phylogenies.

Methods

Blood samples were obtained from 82 badgers at Woodchester Park, Gloucestershire, UK as part of an ongoing long term capture-mark-recapture study [12, 13]. Badgers were live-trapped in steel mesh box traps baited with peanuts, and subsequently examined under anaesthesia before being released at the point of capture. At each capture event, data was collected on the age, gender, location of capture of the animal and biometric measurements were taken. A blood sample was taken from each captured animal and stored at −20 °C before being processed in the laboratory. All badgers in the present study were captured during a single summer season from May to June 2012 inclusive and hence there are no seasonal effects such as variation in body condition. For each badger, the scaled mass index (SMI) - a modification of the condition index [14, 15] - was calculated. The SMI values were calculated using scaling coefficients and mean body length derived from 5059 adult female, 2157 adult male and 2303 cub capture events taken from the Woodchester Park historic database. As the SMIs for the adult males, adult females and cubs differed, each value was standardised by subtracting the mean and dividing by the standard deviation. Badgers with an SMI of <1 indicated a poorer condition while SMI of >1 indicated a better condition.

DNA was extracted using a modification of a phenol-chloroform protocol as described previously with appropriate measures to prevent contamination [16]. Extracted DNA was tested for its ability to amplify by PCR using a set of mammalian tubulin PCR primers, as previously described [16]. Extracted DNA from badger blood was tested for trypanosome infection using the ITS-Specific (nested) PCR method following standard protocols [7]. PCR Primers and reaction conditions used to amplify the 18S region of T. pestanai are described in Additional file 1: Table S1. The 28S ribosomal RNA of T. pestanai was a target region for PCR amplification however the appropriate 28S sequence was not available in the databases. Suitable primers for novel amplification of the 28S rRNA gene from T. pestanai were designed using genes from closely related trypanosomes (see Additional file 2: Table S2). PCR products and their associated primers were outsourced to a sequencing company (Source Bioscience) for purification and sequencing.

The Fisher’s Exact Test and Chi-Square tests were used to assess the association between categorical variables, the Odds ratio (OR) and 95 % Confidence Intervals (CI). For investigating the relationship between the Standardised Scaled Mass Index (SSMI) and trypanosome infection, badgers were allocated to one of four body condition categories (Very Poor, SSMI < −0.75; Poor, SSMI −0.749 to 0.0; Fair, SSMI 0.01 to 0.75; Good, SSMI >0.751) and associations tested as above.

Molecular phylogenetic trees were constructed using parameters described in Additional file 3: Table S3.

For ethical approval, all animal procedures on the badgers were covered by licences issued by the Home Office and the Veterinary Medicines Directorate, following approval by ethics panels at The Food and Environment Research Agency and Animal Health and Veterinary Laboratories Agency. The study was conducted according to the principles of Good Clinical Practice.

Results and Discussion

A total of 82 badger blood samples were tested for trypanosome infection using the ITS-Nested PCR method [7]. Twenty-nine out of the 82 DNA samples amplified using ITS-Nested PCR producing band sizes of approximately 1271 bp indicating the badgers were positive for trypanosomes. This gives a prevalence of 35.4 % (25.9 %–46.2 %; 95 % CI). The 18S PCR was carried out on badger DNA samples that were positive for trypanosome DNA, to identify the species detected and confirm that the ITS-PCR technique was indeed detecting the target species (T. pestanai). The novel 28S region was successfully amplified, producing a band size of 2460 bp, and sequenced [Accession Number KR527480]. No variation was seen between badger trypanosome samples using this marker.

In order to investigate whether the distribution of infected animals (35.4 % prevalence) was evenly spread throughout the Woodchester Park study area, the prevalence of trypanosome infection was examined by gender, body condition and social group. Although, more females (55.2 %) were infected than males (44.8 %), there was no significant association between trypanosome infection and sex (p = 0.771)). Using the Standardised Scale Mass Index (SSMI), badgers were categorised into groups based on relative body condition status (very poor, poor, fair, good–see Methods). There was no relationship between body condition and prevalence of T. pestanai infection in the badgers (p = 0.80). Furthermore, there was no significant difference in the prevalence of infection between adults and cubs (p = 0.98). Badgers used in this study were captured from 26 different social groups (Table 1) and T. pestanai was detected in 15 of those (58 %, Table 1). However, there was no significant association between badger social group and trypanosome infection prevalence (p = 0.464). As the sample size for each social group was small, they were pooled into different regions (East and West; North and South) to investigate any broader geographical differences. Fifty-two (63.4 %) of the badgers were captured in the north, of these, 18 were infected resulting in 34.6 % prevalence while the remaining 30 (36.6 %) were captured in the south and 11 were infected resulting in 36.7 % prevalence. The odds of being a prevalent case was slightly higher for badgers captured in the south (OR = 1.094; 95 %; CI: 0.428–2.791) although there was no significant difference (p = 1.0). Additional analysis carried out in the remaining two quadrants (East and West) of the study area showed that of the 29 (35.4 %) badgers captured in the east, 12 were infected (41.4 % prevalence) while from the remaining 53 (64.6 %) captured in the west 17 were infected (32.1 % prevalence). Although, the odds of infection with trypanosomes was reduced for badgers captured in the East (OR = 0.669; CI: 0.262–1.708) than those in the West the reduction was statistically not significant (p = 0.472). To investigate the phylogenetic relationship of T. pestanai with other trypanosome species, two sets of trees were generated. Firstly, a tree based on existing 18S (SSU-rRNA) sequences was constructed (data not shown) for comparison with a concatenated tree (Fig. 1) with the new 28S sequence (i.e. 18S _ 28S; SSU-rRNA + LSU-rRNA). Trypanoplasma borreli was used to form an out-group and its clade can easily be distinguished from the genus Trypanosoma in both the SSU-rRNA (data not shown) and concatenated tree (Fig. 1). The trypanosomes were divided into two major clades, one representing the salivarian trypanosomes while the other represented the stercorarian trypanosomes with the division being obvious in both the SSU-rRNA and concatenated trees. The Megatrypanum subgenus, appear to cluster together with a high bootstrap support values of 80 % on the SSU-rRNA tree and 70 % on the concatenated tree. Analysis from both trees showed that the badger trypanosome sequences determined from the Woodchester badgers, were positioned in the Megatrypanum clade and clustered together with the published T. pestanai sequences with a high bootstrap value of 100 % on both trees. This confirmed their identity as T. pestanai rather than any other closely related species.
Table 1

Social group of badgers and infection with trypanosomes

Social group at time of capture

Badger population frequency

Trypanosome infection status

Total

  

Frequency

Percent

Not infected

Infected

 

Arthurs

 

2

2.4

2

0

2

Beech

 

7

8.5

4

3

7

Breakheart

 

1

1.2

1

0

1

Boxwood

 

1

1.2

1

0

1

Cedar

 

5

6.1

2

3

5

Colepark

 

1

1.2

1

0

1

Colliers wood

 

1

1.2

1

0

1

Honeywell

 

11

13.4

8

3

11

Inchbrook

 

5

6.1

4

1

5

Jacks

 

4

4.9

2

2

4

Junction

 

4

4.9

2

2

4

Kennel

 

3

3.7

1

2

3

Larch

 

6

7.3

5

1

6

Mead

 

1

1.2

0

1

1

Old oak

 

4

4.9

2

2

4

Parkmill

 

5

6.1

2

3

5

Scotland bank

 

2

2.4

0

2

2

West

 

5

6.1

5

0

5

Windsor edge

 

5

6.1

3

2

5

Woodfarm

 

1

1.2

1

0

1

Woodrush

 

1

1.2

0

1

1

Wychelm

 

2

2.4

2

0

2

Yew

 

2

2.4

2

0

2

Septic

 

1

1.2

1

0

1

Top

 

1

1.2

1

0

1

Nettle

 

1

1.2

0

1

1

Total

26

82

100

53

29

82

Fig. 1

Phylogenetic tree of concatenated SSU-rRNA and LSU-rRNA sequences of badger trypanosomes and comparator species. The phylogenetic analysis was implemented using the Maximum Likelihood method based on the Kimura 2-parameter model. The tree with the highest log likelihood (−4361) is shown. Initial trees for the heuristic search were obtained automatically by applying Neighbor-Join and BioNJ algorithms to a matrix of pairwise distances estimated using the Maximum Composite Likelihood (MCL) approach, and then selecting the topology with the superior log likelihood value. A discrete Gamma distribution was used to model evolutionary rate differences among sites (5 categories (+G, parameter = 0.1323)). The analysis involved 26 nucleotide sequences, 11 of which, used the concatenated datasets (T. grosi, T. otospermophili, T. kuseli, T. rangeli, T.pestanai, T. rotatorium, T. simiae, T. congolense (riverine forest), T. congolense (kilifi), T. congolense (savannah), Trypanoplasma borreli and badger trypanosome). There were a total of 1560 positions in the final dataset. The numbers after species name on branch are the GenInfo Identifier number (GI) while annotated colours indicate different groups of kinetoplastids. Evolutionary analyses were conducted in MEGA6. Herpetosoma Schizotrypanum Megatrypanum Fish trypanosomes Amphibian trypanosomes Salivarian trypanosomes Bodonid

This study reported a 35.4 % prevalence of T. pestanai infection in badgers. This compares with previous studies on trypanosome prevalence in British badgers from Cornwall [3] and Wytham Woods, Oxfordshire [2, 4], with at 10 %, 7.7 % and 31 % respectively. Estimating an absolute prevalence rate may depend on the sensitivity of the diagnostic measure applied to detect trypanosomes in a sample population. For example, the studies that were based on detecting trypanosomes in blood smears from British badgers [3, 4] recorded the lower prevalence estimates (10 % and 7.7 % respectively) and this may be attributed to the difficulty in detecting trypanosomes in blood smears especially when the level of parasitaemia is very low. While a direct comparison cannot be made, the two studies using PCR based methods [2, this study] showed a higher prevalence than those using microscopical analysis [3, 4] which is consistent with (although not indicative of) a higher degree of sensitivity using the molecular approaches. The PCR based study [2], from the Wytham Woods population estimated prevalence to be 31 % (25.6 to 37.1; 95 % CI) which was not significantly different to that derived from the present study at Woodchester Park of 35.4 % (25.9 %–46.2 %; 95 % CI). The ITS-Nested PCR shows a comparable prevalence to the 18S PCR study [2] possibly suggesting that both methods have similar levels of sensitivity. However, the ITS-PCR method has the added advantage of the potential to be used in any mammalian wildlife species and potentially to detect any trypanosome species or species mixtures, thus, offering a more broadly useful tool for surveys of infection in wildlife.

However, despite the potential of the ITS Nested PCR [7] for generic use in wildlife species, sequencing of the 18S rRNA gene, available on databases, needs to be used initially to confirm the trypanosome species or identify possible new species. On the SSU-rRNA phylogenetic tree, the badger trypanosomes detected in this study clustered with T. pestanai (100 % bootstrap value), confirming their identity, and were associated with the Megatrypanum clade. However, the addition of a 28S rRNA sequence of the badger trypanosome did not improve the strength of the Megatrypanum clade association and neither did we observe improvement on any of the other major clades despite previous studies indicating that concatenation of multiple sequences improves phylogenetic inference [17].

Conclusions

In conclusion, the use of nested ITS-PCR for the detection of T. pestanai in badgers shows that it has potential to be an effective tool for molecular detection and identification of trypanosomes in wildlife species such as badgers. Although mixed species infections were not detected in these samples, in the generic case of trypanosome detection in wild animals, unlike the 18S PCR, this approach offers the potential to identify such mixtures if present. Such mixtures have been identified in African cattle, pigs and wild animals [8, 1820]. The observed prevalence of 35.4 % in this study and comparable figures from related studies [2] suggest that a significant proportion of UK badgers could be infected with trypanosomes. As a wide range of wildlife hosts potentially may carry trypanosome infections, perhaps of a variety of different species, the ITS nested PCR method offers a good initial approach to investigating these infections in previously unstudied wildlife hosts.

Declarations

Acknowledgements

We would like to thank the OSAPND (Nigeria) for providing funding for training in detection methods for trypanosomes. Thanks to MARG Education for support with sponsorship application. Thanks go to the British Society for Immunology, Wellcome Trust, University of Salford, British Society for Parasitology and American Society of Parasitology for funding, training and conference support. We thank DEFRA for funding the Woodchester study; all field and laboratory staff involved in sample collection and all landowners for ongoing co-operation with the study.

Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.

Authors’ Affiliations

(1)
Ecosystems and Environment Research Centre, School of Environment and Life Sciences, University of Salford
(2)
National Wildlife Management Centre, Animal and Plant Health Agency
(3)
Environment and Sustainability Institute, University of Exeter
(4)
Biomedical Research Centre, School of Environment and Life Sciences, University of Salford

References

  1. Hamilton PB, Stevens JR, Gaunt MW, Gidley J, Gibson WC. Trypanosomes are monophyletic: evidence from genes for glyceraldehyde phosphate dehydrogenase and small subunit ribosomal RNA. Int J Parasitol. 2004;34:1393–404.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. Lizundia R, Newman C, Buesching CD, Ngugi D, Blake D, Sin WY, et al. Evidence for a role of the host-specific flea (Paraceras melis) in the transmission of Trypanosoma (Megatrypanum) pestanai to the Europian Badger. PLoS One. 2011;6:e16977.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. Pearce MA, Neal C. Trypanosoma (Megatrypanum) pestanai in British badgers (Meles meles). Int J Parasitol. 1973;4:439–40.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  4. Macdonald DW, Anwar M, Newman C, Woodroffe R, Johnson PJ. Inter-annual differences in the age-related prevalences of Babesia and Trypanosoma parasites of European badgers (Meles meles). J Zool. 1999;247:65–70.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  5. Hide G, Tait A. Molecular epidemiology of African sleeping sickness. Parasitology. 2009;136:1491–500.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. Ahmed HA, MacLeod ET, Hide G, Welburn SC, Picozzi K. The best practice for preparation of samples from FTAcards for diagnosis of blood borne infections using African trypanosomes as a model system. Parasit Vectors. 2011;4:68.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. Cox A, Tilley A, McOdimba F, Fyfe J, Hide G, Welburn SC. A PCR based assay for detection and differentiation of African trypanosome species in blood. Exp Parasitol. 2005;111:24–9.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. Cox AP, Tosas O, Tilley A, Picozzi K, Coleman P, Hide G, et al. Constraints to estimating the prevalence of trypanosome infections in East African zebu cattle. Parasit Vectors. 2010;3:82.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. Haag J, O’hUigin C, Overath P. The molecular phylogeny of trypanosomes: evidence for an early divergence of the Salivaria. Mol Biochem Parasitol. 1998;91:37–49.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. Maslov DA, Lukes J, Jirku M, Simpson L. Phylogeny of trypanosomes as inferred from the small and large subunit rRNAs: implications for the evolution of parasitism in the trypanosomatid protozoa. Mol Biochem Parasitol. 1996;75:197–205.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. Viola LB, Almeida RS, Ferreira RC, Campaner M, Takata CS, Rodrigues AC, et al. Evolutionary history of trypanosomes from South American caiman (Caiman yacare) and African crocodiles inferred by phylogenetic analyses using SSU rDNA and gGAPDH genes. Parasitology. 2009;136:55–65.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. Delahay R, Frolich K. Absence of antibodies against canine distemper virus in free-ranging populations of the Eurasian badger in Great Britain. J Wildl Dis. 2000;36:576–9.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. Rogers LM, Delahay R, Cheeseman CL, Langton S, Smith GC, Clifton-Hadley RS. Movement of badgers (Meles meles) in a high-density population: individual, population and disease effects. Proc Biol Sci. 1998;265:1269–76.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. Peig J, Green AJ. New perspectives for estimating body condition from mass/length data: the scaled mass index as an alternative method. Oikos. 2009;118:1883–91.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  15. Peig J, Green AJ. The paradigm of body condition: a critical reappraisal of current methods based on mass and length. Funct Ecol. 2010;24:1323–32.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  16. Bajnok J, Boyce K, Rogan MT, Craig PS, Lun ZR, Hide G. Prevalence of Toxoplasma gondii in localized populations of Apodemus sylvaticus is linked to population genotype not to population location. Parasitology. 2015;142:680–90.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. Gadagkar SR, Rosenberg MS, Kumar S. Inferring species phylogenies from multiple genes: concatenated sequence tree versus consensus gene tree. J Exp Zool B Mol Dev Evol. 2005;304:64–74.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. Ahmed HA, Picozzi K, Welburn SC, Macleod ET. A comparative evaluation of PCR-based methods for species-specific determination of African animal trypanosomes in Ugandan cattle. Parasit Vectors. 2013;6:316.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. Hamill LC, Kaare MT, Welburn SC, Picozzi K. Domestic pigs as potential reservoirs of human and animal trypanosomiasis in Northern Tanzania. Parasit Vectors. 2013;6:322.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. Simo G, Mbida Mbida JA, Ebo’o Evenga V, Asonganyi T, Njiokou F, Grebaut P. Challenges towards the elimination of Human African Trypanosomiasis in the sleeping sickness focus of Campo in southern Cameroon. Parasit Vectors. 2014;7:374.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright

© Ideozu et al. 2015

Comments

By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.

Advertisement