Histozoic myxosporeans infecting the stomach wall of elopiform fishes represent a novel lineage, the Gastromyxidae
© Freeman and Kristmundsson. 2015
Received: 4 May 2015
Accepted: 3 October 2015
Published: 9 October 2015
Traditional studies on myxosporeans have used myxospore morphology as the main criterion for identification and taxonomic classification, and it remains important as the fundamental diagnostic feature used to confirm myxosporean infections in fish and other vertebrate taxa. However, its use as the primary feature in systematics has led to numerous genera becoming polyphyletic in subsequent molecular phylogenetic analyses. It is now known that other features, such as the site and type of infection, can offer a higher degree of congruence with molecular data, albeit with its own inconsistencies, than basic myxospore morphology can reliably provide.
Histozoic gastrointestinal myxosporeans from two elopiform fish from Malaysia, the Pacific tarpon Megalops cyprinoides and the ten pounder Elops machnata were identified and described using morphological, histological and molecular methodologies.
The myxospore morphology of both species corresponds to the generally accepted Myxidium morphotype, but both had a single nucleus in the sporoplasm and lacked valvular striations. In phylogenetic analyses they were robustly grouped in a discrete clade basal to myxosporeans, with similar shaped myxospores, described from gill monogeneans, which are located at the base of the multivalvulid clade. New genera Gastromyxum and Monomyxum are erected to accommodate these myxosporean taxa from fish and gill monogeneans respectively. Each are placed in a new family, the Gastromyxidae with Gastromyxum as the type genus and Monomyxidae with Monomyxum as the type genus.
To improve modern systematics of the myxosporeans it is clear that a combination of biological, ecological, morphological and molecular data should be used in descriptive studies, and the naming and redistribution of taxa and genera is going to be necessary to achieve this. Here we demonstrate why some Myxidium-shaped myxospores should not be included in the family Myxidiidae, and create two new families to accommodate them based on their site of infection, host biology / ecology, DNA sequence data and morphological observations. Subsequent descriptive works need to follow a similar course if we are going to create a prevailing and workable systematic structure for the Myxosporea.
KeywordsGastromyxum Monomyxidae Monomyxum Elopiformes Monogenea Histozoic Hyperparasite
Myxosporeans are common parasites of fish and in recent molecular taxonomic studies they form two main groups, being mainly from hosts that inhabit either freshwater or marine environments [1, 2]. Known myxosporean life cycles involve two hosts, with infections in fish resulting in the production of myxospores, whilst morphologically dissimilar actinospores are produced in an annelid invertebrate host. Traditional studies on myxosporeans have used myxospore morphology as the main criterion for identification and taxonomic classification. This has led to numerous genera becoming polyphyletic in subsequent molecular phylogenetic analyses and it is now known that other features, such as the site of infection in fish, can, for some clades of myxosporeans, offer a far higher degree of congruence with molecular data, than basic myxospore morphology can provide [1, 3–5]. However, myxospore morphology remains important, as it is the fundamental diagnostic feature that veterinarians and scientists use for identification and it remains the distinguishing characteristic of myxosporean infections in fish and other vertebrate taxa.
Myxidium incomptavermi was described from Myxidium-shaped myxospores found infecting monogeneans from the gills of Megalops cyprinoides in Malaysia . However, monogeneans are not typical hosts for myxosporeans and myxospores are not normally found in the invertebrate host. In that study, no myxospores of M. incomptavermi were found in the fish that were host to the infected monogeneans and multiple fish were found to have monogeneans that were infected with myxospores. But, a specific PCR was able to detect the DNA of M. incomptavermi in numerous tissues of the fish host, in particular the stomach and intestine, suggesting that the fish might be involved in the life cycle or the transmission of M. incomptavermi to gill monogeneans .
The aim of the present study was to screen for the presence of gastrointestinal myxosporeans from two elopiform fishes (order: Elopiformes), from Malaysian mangrove systems, the Pacific tarpon M. cyprinoides and the ten pounder Elops machnata. Both fish species are found in shallow coastal marine and brackish water environments, entering the mangroves during the night. The ten pounders or ladyfish (Elopiformes: Elopidae), and tarpons (Elopiformes: Megalopidae) together with their sister group the eels (Anguilliformes) form the Elopomorpha which are one of the oldest major extant teleost lineages [7, 8].
Elops machnata were purchased from the main fish market in Kuah, Langkawi. Megalops cyprinoides, were bought from the same market and also captured whilst night fishing with gill nets in Kilim mangroves, northeast Langkawi, and kept alive prior to examination. In addition, M. cyprinoides were purchased from the fish market at Pangkor Island, Perak and captured live at the Bachok Marine Research Station, Kelantan. All fish were examined for the presence of histozoic myxosporeans in the gastrointestinal tract by scraping the stomach and intestine lining with a scalpel blade and viewing with an Olympus BX-41 compound microscope. Images of fresh myxospores were taken using a Leica DMLB digital camera using Cell imaging software. The dimensions of at least 20 myxospores from each host fish were calculated using Image J 1.42q  following the accepted guidelines of Lom & Arthur . Elops machnata were also examined for the presence of gill monogeneans, by removing each gill arch, placing it in seawater and observing between the primary filaments using a dissecting microscope.
Tissue samples that were shown to be positive for myxosporeans were fixed in 10 % buffered formalin for histological analysis. After fixation, tissues were prepared for standard wax histology and 4 μm sections were dewaxed, stained with Giemsa and examined using a compound microscope. Positive tissue samples were also fixed for transmission electron microscopy (TEM) as previously described . Fish that were found to have heavy infections were used to prepare samples for scanning electron microscopy (SEM). For the SEM examination, myxospores were removed from heavily infected stomach wall tissues by scraping with a scalpel and placing in a tube containing PBS. Tubes were then centrifuged at 1500g for 5 min, the supernatant removed and the pellet fixed in 2.5 % glutaraldehyde for 4h. After fixation, the spores were prepared for SEM and viewed following the methods described by Kristmundsson and Freeman . In brief, washed spores were syringed onto a polycarbonate membrane, fixed with 1 % osmium tetroxide and dehydrated through an ethanol series. Membranes were dried, mounted on stubs, sputter-coated with gold and viewed, between 5 and 10 kV, with a FEI Quanta 450 FEG FE-SEM.
Infected gastrointestinal tissue or myxospore-positive intestinal scrapings were fixed in 95 % ethanol or placed directly into DNA lysis buffer for molecular analyses. Total DNA was extracted using a GeneMATRIX DNA isolation kit (EURx Poland) following the tissue protocol and used as templates in subsequent PCR reactions. Parasite small subunit ribosomal DNA (SSU rDNA) was amplified using the general myxosporean primers and methodology described by Freeman et al.  and the Kudoa-specific primer Kud-80f actgcgaagcgctcagta  with the new reverse primer Kud-790r cgcctgctttgagcactgtg, utilising the same PCR conditions. PCRs were conducted on parasite DNA from 4 fish for each species. A specific PCR was designed and optimised for the new myxosporean from M. cyprinoides, in order to be able to differentiate it from Myxidium incomptavermi in fish with dual infections or those with both DNA present. The primers Mi2-470f taccggagttgaccttcacg and Mi2-1040r actgatcccgtggtggcat amplified a 570bp region of SSU rDNA of this novel myxosporean, using the same PCR conditions except utilising an annealing temperature of 65C. Two additional forward primers were designed to match the new myxosporeans described in this study but not to anneal to M. incomptavermi. Gastro-250f actgtgcatatcgaatgggct and Gastro-1100fagtacggtcgcaaggctga were used with the general reverse primers (1430r and 18gM respectively) and PCR conditions described by Freeman et al. . All DNA samples taken from M. cyprinoides were screened for M. incomptavermi using the specific PCR described by Freeman & Shinn  and spores measurements were only taken from PCR negative fish and those shown to be positive with the specific PCR (Mi2-470f / Mi2-1040r).
All PCRs were performed in triplicate and PCR products of the expected sizes were recovered using a GeneMATRIX PCR products extraction kit (EURx Poland). Sequencing reactions were performed using BigDyeTM Terminator cycle sequencing chemistry utilising the same oligonucleotide primers that were used for the original PCRs. DNA sequencing was performed in both forward and reverse directions for all PCR products and nucleotide BLAST searches performed for each sequence read to confirm a myxosporean origin . The contiguous sequences were obtained manually using CLUSTAL X and BioEdit [15, 16]. CLUSTAL X was used for the initial SSU rDNA sequence alignments of the novel sequences and 31 other histozoic marine myxosporeans. Percentage divergence matrices were constructed from selected aligned taxa in CLUSTAL X using the neighbour-joining method based on the Kimura 2-parameter model .
Phylogenetic analyses were performed using the maximum likelihood methodology in PhyML  with the general time-reversible substitution model selected and 1000 bootstrap repeats, and Bayesian inference (BI) analysis using MrBayes v. 3.2 . For the BI analysis, models of nucleotide substitution were first evaluated for the alignment using MrModeltest v. 2.2 . The most parameter-rich evolutionary model based on the AIC was the general time-reversible, GTR + I + G model of evolution. Therefore, the settings used for the analysis were nst = 6, with the gamma-distributed rate variation across sites and a proportion of invariable sites (rates = invgamma). The priors on state frequency were left at the default setting (Prsetstatefreqpr = dirichlet (1,1,1,1)). Posterior probability distributions were generated using the Markov Chain Monte Carlo (MCMC) method with four chains being run simultaneously for 1,000,000 generations. Burn in was set at 2500 and trees were sampled every 100 generations making a total of 7500 trees used to compile the majority rule consensus trees.
Results and discussion
Six Elops machnata ranging in size from 39–81 cm in fork length (FL) and a total of 38 Megalops cyprinoides, 26 from Langkawi (FL 19–32 cm), 9 from Pangkor (FL 17–30) and 3 from Bachok (FL 20–25) were dissected and checked for the presence on myxospores under the microscope. All six E. machnata (100 % prevalence) had a histozoic myxosporean infecting the stomach wall. A total of 17 M. cyprinoides (45 % prevalence) also had a myxosporean in the stomach wall, 10 from Langkawi (38 % prevalence), seven from Pangkor (78 % prevalence) and none from Bachok (0 % prevalence). No morphologically different myxosporeans were found lower in the intestinal tract in either fish species and spore density was highest from the stomach tissue. No monogeneans were found on the gills of E. machnata, the gills of M. cyprinoides were not examined in this study.
Almost complete SSU rDNA sequences were obtained for both myxosporeans using the aforementioned PCRs and assigned the GenBank accession numbers KT002405/6, with 1745 bp sequenced for the myxosporean from E. machnata and 1662 bp sequenced for the myxosporean from M. cyprinoides. BLAST searches of the contiguous sequences showed that the closest relative in the databases was Myxidium incomptavermi for both myxosporeans, with similarities of 91 %. The PCR using the primer pair Mi2-470f / Mi2-1040r only amplified the myxosporean from M. cyprinoides and did not amplify DNA from M. incomptavermi. Likewise, both new forward primers Gastro-250f and Gastro-1100f, when used with universal myxosporean reverse primers, only amplified the two novel myxosporeans and did not amplify M. incomptavermi. DNA samples from the stomach wall of some M. cyprinoides (5 fish) tested weakly positive for M. incomptavermi, therefore these fish were not used for myxospore evaluation; however, no morphologically dissimilar myxospores were observed from these five fish.
Due to the distinct nature of these two myxosporeans with respect to host, site of infection and DNA sequence data, new species descriptions are made and we propose to place the two novel myxosporeans from this study in a new genus Gastromyxum n. gen. (Gastromyxum bulani n. sp. from M. cyprinoides and Gastromyxum rafii n. sp. from E. machnata). In addition, we suggest transferring the two species that infect gill monogeneans, Myxidium incomptavermi  and the undescribed Myxidium sp. from Japan (GQ368245) to a new genus Monomyxum n. gen. (Monomyxum incomptavermi n. comb. and Monomyxum sp.).
Percentage identities of SSU rDNA sequences, above diagonal, and number of bases compared, below diagonal, for Gastromyxum spp. and phylogenetically related myxosporeans and the type species of Myxidium, M. lieberkuehni
(1) Gastromyxum elopsi
(2) Gastromyxum bulani
(3) Monomyxum incomptavermi
(4) Monomyxum sp.
(5) Kudoa thyrsites
(6) K. amamiensis
(7) Unicapsula sp.
(8) Enteromyxum leei
(9) Myxidium lieberkuehni
Although the morphology of Gastromyxum and Monomyxum myxospores share similarities to each other and to the generally accepted Myxidium morphotype, we propose to create two new families to accommodate these new genera. The Gastromyxidae n. fam., type genus Gastromyxum, and the Monomyxidae n. fam., type genus Monomyxum. These new families both represent distinct marine myxosporean lineages, each with unique features that differ from Myxidium sensu stricto in host type, spore morphology, tissue location and development and DNA sequence data. The type species of Myxidium, M. lieberkuehni is commonly found as coelozoic in the urinary system of the freshwater pike, Esox lucius, in the holarctic region of the northern hemisphere, it has elongated and striated myxospores with a sporoplasm containing two nuclei unlike those in the current description that have a single nucleus and smooth spore valves. In addition, M. lieberkuehni is robustly phylogenetically placed away from marine myxosporeans in a discrete clade with other coelozoic species infecting freshwater fishes [1, 12, 22].
Class Myxosporea Bütschli, 1881
Order Bivalvulida Shulman, 1959
Suborder Variisporina Lom et Noble, 1984
Gastromyxidae n. fam. Freeman et Kristmundsson, 2015
Spores are generally fusiform, being sigmoid to rhomboid in the sutural view and lemon to crescent-shaped and in valvular view, with no striations and an inconspicuous curved sutural line that bisects the spore but not through the pointed extremities associated with the polar capsule apex. Two large tear-shaped to pyriform polar capsules lie at opposite ends of the spore, with a single nucleus between them. Polar filaments are discharged, in opposing directions, through capsular foramina that are located at the rounded or pointed extremities of the spore valves. Histozoic in the gastrointestinal tract of marine fishes forming polysporous plasmodia.
Single genus: Gastromyxum n. gen. (type genus)
Gastromyxum n. gen.
With characteristics of the family. Spores are sigmoid to rhomboid in the sutural view and lemon-shaped in valvular view. Polar capsules are large and tear-shaped to pyriform. Histozoic in the stomach of marine fishes, forming polysporous plasmodia in the glandular part of the stomach wall. Not pathogenic to fish with little or no host tissue responses observed. Two species, possibly three see Myxidium elopsi.
Etymology : Gastro from the Greek gastros meaning stomach, refers to the tissue location.
Gastromyxum bulani n. sp. (type species)
Type locality: Coastal waters of Langkawi Island, Peninsular Malaysia
Type host: Megalops cyprinoides (Broussonet, 1782)
Site of infection: cardiac glands of stomach wall
Etymology : bulani refers to the Malay name for the fish host, ikan bulan
Type material: two Giemsa stained histological slides, a Diff Quik stained slide of fresh spores and frozen DNA sample have been deposited at the Institute for Experimental Pathology at Keldur, University of Iceland, with the following registration numbers (2015.110 -14).
Gastromyxum rafii n. sp.
Type locality: Coastal waters of Langkawi Island, Peninsular Malaysia
Type host: Elops machnata (Forsskål, 1775)
Site of infection: Cardiac glands of stomach wall
Etymology : rafii refers to the name of a friend from Langkawi that sadly recently passed away.
Type material: Two Giemsa stained histological slides, a DiffQuik stained slide of fresh spores and frozen DNA sample have been deposited at the Institute for Experimental Pathology at Keldur, University of Iceland, with the following registration numbers (2015.120 -24).
Monomyxidae n. fam. Freeman et Kristmundsson, 2015
Spores are fusiform, being sigmoid in the sutural view and lemon-shaped and in valvular view, with no striations and an inconspicuous curved sutural line that bisects the spore but not through the pointed extremities associated with the polar capsule apex. Two large tear-shaped to pyriform polar capsules lie at opposite ends of the spore, with a single nucleus between them. Polar filaments are discharged, in opposing directions, through capsular foramina that are located at the pointed ends of the spore valves. Histozoic in the parenchymal tissues of gill monogeneans probably forming disporous pseudoplasmodia (not confirmed).
Single genus: Monomyxum n. gen. (type genus)
Monomyxum n. gen.
Spores are fusiform and sigmoid in the sutural view and lemon-shaped in valvular view. Polar capsules are large and tear-shaped to pyriform. Histozoic in the parenchymal tissues of gill monogeneans from marine fish, may form disporous plasmodia (not confirmed). Infected monogeneans appear to be moribund or senescent indicating pathogenicity. Two species.
Etymology : mono refers to the monogenean host.
Monomyxum incomptavermi n. comb. (type species) (syn Myxidium incomptavermi) Freeman et Shinn, 2011
Site of infection: Parenchymal tissues of monogenean host. Described from myxospores infecting the gill monogenean Diplectanocotyla gracilis from M. cyprinoides caught from the coastal waters of Langkawi Island, Peninsular Malaysia.
Also detected by PCR in certain tissues (kidney, spleen, intestinal tract) from the fish host, M. cyprinoides, but no myxospores yet encountered in fish host. Myxospore morphology is very similar to that of Gastromyxum bulani, the latter being identified using diagnostic PCRs to identify hosts with no trace amplifications of M. incomptavermi.
Monomyxum sp. (see Freeman et al. )
Site of infection: Parenchymal tissues of monogenean host. Reported from gill monogenea, Haliotrema sp. from a Platycephals sp. collected from Lake Hamana, Japan. Resampling to complete a full species description has been unsuccessful.
Zoobank information: This manuscript has been registered with ZooBank under the following lsid.:zoobank.org:pub:A888924F-8EC6-48C3-BA0E-D9798963BF5E
Gastromyxidae n. fam.: lsid:zoobank.org:act:E6D87E29-74AC-4138-9355-B11D383C13E6
Gastromyxum n. g.: lsid:zoobank.org:act:BA1B4338-60C8-425F-8194-4EF024724F12
Gastromyxum bulani n. sp.: lsid:zoobank.org:act:994E49B5-AE7A-4A7C-B442-A00DA01EFD70
Gastromyxum rafii n. sp.: lsid:zoobank.org:act:96457F71-D0F3-4FE5-80AE-0BE2E76C9771
Monomyxidae n. fam. : lsid:zoobank.org:act:C1417121-3534-44E7-A69A-BC4AECC37269
Monomyxum n. g.: lsid:zoobank.org:act:783DAEA0-DE07-4270-918D-1ACF95049206
Monomyxum incomptavermi n. comb.: lsid:zoobank.org:act:7DD6B3CC-8124-41D1-99C8-C0A6248BFF02
It is not known whether M. incomptavermi infections develop to form myxospores in the fish host and no myxospores were detected from fish in earlier studies . However, the stomach wall was not thoroughly examined in that study, assuming it might potentially be the site of infection for M. incomptavermi in fish, as it is for G. bulani. In the present study, myxospores of G. bulani and G. rafii were deeply embedded in the glandular tissue of the stomach which had to be scraped sufficiently hard to release spores for identification in fresh preparations using a compound microscope. It is possible that other infections, in the glandular part of the stomach, have gone unnoticed due to this reason and that this tissue is a more common site for myxosporean infections in fish than is currently known. Spores of M. incomptavermi measured from gill monogeneans infecting M. cyprinoides  were very similar in shape to those of G. bulani but were more fusiform and slender in form, being slightly longer, 11.62 μm (11.27–11.75) and less broad 4.92 μm (4.19–5.56). In the present study, no myxospores conforming to the shape of M. incomptavermi were encountered; however, DNA from M. incomptavermi was detected using a specific PCR from 5 fish indicating its presence in some form. Therefore, it still remains unknown if M. incomptavermi infections develop in fish or whether they are just transient or dead-end infections, but the prevalence of G. bulani is much higher and readily detected as myxospores from the stomach wall. It is possible, even likely, that M. incomptavermi and G. bulani share an unknown common ancestor as they have very similar spore morphologies, are detected from the same fish host and have nearly 90 % similarity with respect to SSU rDNA sequences. However, more sequence data from additional taxa are required to fully clarify the inter-family relationships for this part of the myxosporean tree. Indeed, M. incomptavermi has a higher similarity in the SSU rDNA (93.1 %) to Monomyxum sp. from a monogenean from Japan found on an unrelated fish (Platycephalus sp.) and G. bulani and G. rafii also share a greater similarity in the SSU rDNA (94.8 %) despite being in different fish hosts and having more significant differences in myxospore morphology (Figs. 1, 2, 3). These generic relationships are confirmed in the phylogenetic analyses (Fig. 7) which support monogeneans as being true hosts for myxosporeans and demonstrates that the two Monomyxum spp. share a more recent common ancestor than they do to either Gastromyxum sp. from fish and vica versa. However, this allows us to speculate that myxospore morphology may be more conserved in certain host systems. Gastromyxum bulani and M. incomptavermi share very similar myxospore morphologies and are both found on the same species of fish, albeit one in a monogenean; however, they are less genetically related to each other than each is to another, different shaped, myxospore form in a different fish / monogenean host system. This might suggest that evolutionary changes in myxospore morphology could occur at a slower rate in one species of fish, even when becoming hyperparsitic in their gill monogeneans, than it does when a switching of fish host has occurred, even if the fish are found in the same environment, as is the case for M. cyprinoides and E. machnata. Put simply, if myxospore morphology evolved evenly in all host systems, we might expect the more closely related Gastromyxum spp. to look more similar, when in fact, G. bulani looks remarkably similar to M. incomptavermi, known from the same fish host, despite being more distantly related to it. It is also possible that it is a coincidence that these spores have near identical morphologies, however, we consider this unlikely as morphological variability among Myxidium-shaped spores is wide-ranging , and the similarities between these two species is very striking. It is also noteworthy that G. bulani and G. rafii both infect elopiform fishes (order: Elopiformes), from mangrove systems from the west coast of peninsular Malaysia, suggesting that elopiform fish may be a more common host to Gastromyxum spp.. Interestingly, the myxosporean, Myxidium elopsi, described from the intestine of Elops senegalensis from the Atlantic coast of West Africa  has a very similar spore morphology to G. rafii and is found as histozoic in the intestine of a closely related elopiform fish. It is highly likely that M. elopsi belongs in the genus Gastromyxum, and its similar shape to G. rafii and elopiform host further support the theories that myxospore morphology is potentially better conserved in a single species or closely related fish species (same genus), and that elopiform fishes may be a common host for Gatromyxum spp.
No monogeneans were found on the gills of E. machnata in this study and PCR testing of gill monogenean DNA from M. cyprinoides from a previous study , using specific PCRs designed in this study for Gastromyxum, did not amplify G. bulani. This suggests that Gastromyxum spp. do not infect gill monogeneans, but this will require further research effort to unambiguously demonstrate.
Traditional myxosporean taxonomy has been heavily dependent upon the morphology of myxospores to differentiate between the numerous different taxa. More recently, multiple molecular phylogenetic studies of the Myxosporea have repeatedly and robustly demonstrated that the generic assignment of taxa based on myxospore morphology has resulted in a polyphyletic distribution of many genera, which has led to some genera such as Myxidium and Zschokkella becoming misleadingly high in species number, many of which are incorrectly assigned. It is also clear that some myxospore morphotypes have formed or reformed on more than one occasion during myxosporean evolution, which is probably due to comparable biological and environmental constraints and pressures that needed to be satisfied during their evolution, but does not necessarily mean they belong in the same family or genus. Many older studies provide excellent descriptions, but assign primary weight to myxospore morphology (no DNA data available) which unknowingly led to incorrect taxonomic placements with respect to genus or family. However, surprisingly numerous recent descriptions, also provide good taxonomic data but still assign primary weight to myxospore morphology, leading to generic assignments that are inconsistent with known molecular data [6, 24].
As myxospores remain our definitive confirmation of myxosporean infections in vertebrates, we must find alternative ways in which to develop a more meaningful systematic approach for the nomenclature of myxosporean taxa. As myxospore presence and morphology is often our first point of reference it must remain part of the overall approach, but must be combined with, but come second, to other potentially more meaningful data. However, it is not clear how this can be easily achieved and readily applied across the whole group. The site of infection in the host (muscle, GB, urinary system etc.) and whether development is histozoic or coelozoic is useful and gives strong congruence with molecular data for some clades but it is not clear in all, for example the parvicapsulids. Histopathology can reveal different developmental stages and important interactions with host cells, but if cross-referenced to infections at a differing stage could be misleading and may vary with both parasite and host strains. Host species and environmental data (marine, freshwater, geographic location etc.) can show good compatibility to molecular phylogenies, but again numerous exceptions exist, such as the marine myxobolids.
In short, if we want a new taxonomic framework for the myxosporeans to reflect molecular phylogenies, it is imperative to provide good molecular data with every description. But, this must be augmented with as much other relevant data as possible.
During this study, it became clear that the discovery of myxosporean parasites, found as histozoic infections in the stomach of elopiform fishes from Malaysia, were novel and that they required taxonomic description. However, when we evaluated all the taxonomic information gathered herein, no family placement or generic assignment was suitable. Therefore, we have placed less emphasis on myxospore morphology and created a new family and genus, the Gastromyxidae: Gastromyxum, to accommodate them. During this process, it also became clear that myxosporean taxa infecting gill monogeneans were a distinct lineage, that have been incorrectly assigned to Myxidium due to the dogma of following myxospore morphology as the primary taxonomic criterion , and that a new generic and family assignment, the Monomyxidae: Monomyxum, was called for. In many cases, myxospore morphology will be able to provide useful characters within certain groups/clades, which may correspond to certain myxosporean genera, such as in the Gastromyxum; however, it must be used carefully and in combination with other important features for that particular group or clade of myxosporeans.
In order to resolve the perennial taxonomic issues surrounding this group, deeper taxonomic assignment and resolution is going to be required. Here we demonstrate and give sound reasons why some species with Myxidium-shaped myxospores should not be included in the family Myxidiidae, and subsequent descriptive works will hopefully follow a similar course so we can collectively create a modern and workable phylogenetic framework for the myxosporeans.
This project was financially supported by a University of Malaya Research Grant RP001L-13SUS. We would like to thank Hasbi from Kilim, Langkawi whose knowledge as a local fisherman was vital for the collection of the live fish needed for this study and for the memorable times on his boat. We would also like to thank the reviewers for their constructive and helpful suggestions that helped form the final version of this manuscript.
Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
- Fiala I. The phylogeny of Myxosporea (Myxozoa) based on small subunit ribosomal RNA gene analysis. Int J Parasitol. 2006;36:1521–34.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Holzer AS, Wootten R, Sommerville C. The secondary structure of the unusually long 18S ribosomal RNA of the myxozoan Sphaerospora truttae and structural evolutionary trends in the Myxozoa. Int J Parasitol. 2007;37:1281–95.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Holzer AS, Sommerville C, Wootten R. Molecular relationships and phylogeny in a community of myxosporeans and actinosporeans based on their 18S rDNA sequences. Int J Parasitol. 2004;34:1099–111.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Freeman MA, Yokoyama H, Ogawa K. Description and phylogeny of Ceratomyxa anko sp. n. and Zschokkella lophii sp. n. from the Japanese anglerfish, Lophius litulon (Jordan). J Fish Dis. 2008;31:921–30.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Bartošová P, Freeman MA, Yokoyama H, Caffara M, Fiala I. Phylogenetic position of Sphaerospora testicularis and Latyspora scomberomori n. gen.n. sp. (Myxozoa) within the marine urinary clade. Parasitology. 2011;138:381–93.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Freeman MA, Shinn AP. Myxosporean hyperparasites of gill monogeneans are basal to the Multivalvulida. Parasit Vectors. 2011;4:220.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
- Chen JN, López JA, Lavoué S, Miya M, Chen WJ. Phylogeny of the Elopomorpha (Teleostei): evidence from six nuclear and mitochondrial markers. Mol Phylogenet Evol. 2014;70:152–61.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Wiley EO, Johnson GD. A teleost classification based on monophyletic groups. In: Nelson JS, Schultze H-P, Wilson MVH, editors. Origin and Phylogenetic Interrelationships of Teleosts. 2010. Verlag Dr. Friedrich Pfeil, pp. 123–182.Google Scholar
- Schneider CA, Rasband WS, Eliceiri KW. NIH Image to ImageJ: 25 years of image analysis. Nat Methods. 2012;9:671–5.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Lom J, Arthur JR. A guideline for the preparation of species description on Myxosporea. J Fish Dis. 1989;12:151–6.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Freeman MA, Kristmundsson Á. Ultrastructure of Nucleospora cyclopteri, an intranuclear microsporidian infecting the Atlantic lumpfish (Cyclopterus lumpus L.). Bul Eur Ass Fish Pathol. 2013;33:194–8.Google Scholar
- Kristmundsson Á, Freeman MA. Sphaeromyxids form part of a diverse group of myxosporeans infecting the hepatic biliary systems of a wide range of host organisms. Parasit Vectors. 2013;6:51.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
- Kristmundsson Á, Freeman MA. Negative effects of Kudoa islandica n. sp. (Myxosporea: Kudoidae) on aquaculture and wild fisheries in Iceland. Int J Parasitol Parasites Wildl. 2014;3:135–46.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
- Zhang Z, Schwartz S, Wagner L, Miller W. A greedy algorithm for aligning DNA sequences. J Comput Biol. 2000;7:203–14.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Thompson JD, Gibson TJ, Plewniak F, Jeanmougin F, Higgins DG. The CLUSTAL-X windows interface: flexible strategies for multiple sequence alignment aided by quality analysis tools. Nucl Acids Res. 1997;24:4876–82.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Hall TA. BioEdit: a user-friendly biological sequence alignment editor and analysis program for Windows 95/98/ NT. Nucleic Acids Symp Ser. 1999;41:95–8.Google Scholar
- Saitou N, Nei M. The neighbour-joining method: a new method for reconstructing phylogenetic trees. Mol Biol Evol. 1987;4:406–25.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Guindon S, Dufayard JF, Lefort V, Anisimov M, Hordijk W, Gascuel O. New algorithms and methods to estimate maximum-likelihood phylogenies:assessing the performance of PhyML 3.0. Syst Biol. 2010;59:307–21.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Ronquist F, Huelsenbeck JP. MrBayes 3: Bayesian phylogenetic inference under mixed models. Bioinformatics. 2003;19:1572–4.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Nylander JAA, Ronquist F, Huelsenbeck JP, Nieves-Aldrey JL. Bayesian phylogenetic analysis of combined data. Syst Biol. 2004;53:47–67.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Palenzuela O, Redondo MJ, Alvarez-Pellitero P. Description of Enteromyxum scophthalmi gen. nov., sp. nov. (Myxozoa), an intestinal parasite of turbot (Scophthalmus maximus L.) using morphological and ribosomal RNA sequence data. Parasitology. 2002;124:369–79.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Lom J, Dyková I, Feist S. Myxosporea induced xenoma formation in pike Esox lucius L. renal corpuscles associated with Myxidium lieberkhuehni infection. Eur J Protistol. 1989;24:271–80.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Fiala I, Hlavničková M, Kodádková A, Freeman MA, Bartošová-Sojková P, Atkinson SD. Evolutionary origin of Ceratonova shasta and phylogeny of the marine myxosporean lineage. Mol Phylogenet Evol. 2015;86:75–89.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Atkinson SD, Foott JS, Bartholomew JL. Erection of Ceratonova n. gen. (Myxosporea: Ceratomyxidae) to encompass freshwater species C. gasterostea n. sp. from threespine stickleback (Gasterosteus aculeatus) and C. shasta n. comb. from salmonid fishes. J Parasitol. 2014;100:640–5.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Freeman MA, Yoshinaga T, Ogawa K, Lim LHS. Myxidium-like myxosporean hyperparasites of gill monogeneans are basal multivalvulidans. Proc 14th EAFP Meeting, Prague, September 14–19, 2009. http://myxozoa.org/files/posters/freeman_etal_EAFP2009-hyperparasitism.pdf
- Eiras JC, Saraiva A, Cruz CF, Santos MJ, Fiala I. Synopsis of the species of Myxidium Bütschli, 1882 (Myxozoa: Myxosporea: Bivalvulida). Syst Parasitol. 2011;80:81–116.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Kpatcha TK, Diebakate C, Toguebaye BS. Myxosporidies (Myxozoa, Myxosporea) des genres Sphaeromyxa Thélohan, 1892, Myxidium Butschli, 1882, Zschokkella Auerbach, 1910, Bipteria Kolvaljova, Zubtchenko et Krasin, 1983 et Leptotheca Thélohan, 1895 parasites des poissons des côtes sénégalaises Afrique de l’Ouest. J Afr Zool. 1996;110:309–17.Google Scholar