Open Access

Current distribution of the invasive mosquito species, Aedes koreicus [Hulecoeteomyia koreica] in northern Italy

  • Fabrizio Montarsi1Email author,
  • Andrea Drago2,
  • Simone Martini2,
  • Mattia Calzolari3,
  • Francesco De Filippo3,
  • Alessandro Bianchi3,
  • Matteo Mazzucato1,
  • Silvia Ciocchetta4, 5,
  • Daniele Arnoldi6,
  • Frédéric Baldacchino6,
  • Annapaola Rizzoli6 and
  • Gioia Capelli1
Parasites & Vectors20158:614

https://doi.org/10.1186/s13071-015-1208-4

Received: 12 August 2015

Accepted: 11 November 2015

Published: 1 December 2015

Abstract

Background

The invasive species Aedes (Finlaya) koreicus was first identified in north-eastern Italy in 2011, during the ongoing surveillance activity of Aedes albopictus. Following this finding, a more intensive monitoring was carried out to assess the distribution of the species and to collect biological data. Herein, we report the new records obtained by four years of surveillance.

Findings

The presence of Ae. koreicus was checked using ovitraps, adults traps and by larval collections in all possible breeding sites from May 2011 to July 2015. The monitoring started in the site of the first detection (Province of Belluno) and was then extended in the neighbouring Provinces belonging to four Regions. Aedes koreicus was found in 73 municipalities out of 155 monitored (47.1 %), including 23 municipalities (14.8 %) previously not infested. The area of first detection of Ae. koreicus (Province of Belluno) was also the most infested (68 %). However the mosquito has also been found to the west (Province of Trento) and to the south and south-west (Provinces of Vicenza and Treviso) of the initially infested area.

Conclusions

The spread of Ae. koreicus is directed towards south and west from the original infested area, likely due to the dense road connections and the habitat suitability of the new areas. According to these records, northern Italy has a high probability to be invaded by Ae. koreicus in the next decade. These data can be useful to validate predictive models of potential distribution and dispersal of this species in Italy or in Europe.

Keywords

Aedes koreicus Invasive mosquito speciesEntomological surveillanceItaly

Findings

Since the discovery of the invasive mosquito species (IMS) Aedes albopictus (Skuse) or Asian tiger mosquito in north-eastern Italy in 1991 [1], many local surveillance and control programs were started. The entomological survey is primarily based on the use of ovitraps in areas where the tiger mosquito is present, while in non-colonized areas, collection of larvae/pupae and adult trapping are the best methods for its early detection. In 2011, during the surveillance activity in a tiger mosquito-free area of the Veneto Region, an unexpected mosquito was caught with different features from Ae. albopictus. Larvae and adults were then morphologically and molecularly identified as Aedes (Finlaya) koreicus (Edwards) [2]. The finding of Ae. koreicus in Italy represents the second incursion in Europe [2], after a previous report in Belgium in 2008 [3]. After the first Italian record, a more intensive monitoring was carried out to follow the distribution of Ae. koreicus and to collect biological data on its life cycle.

In this work we update the results of four years of surveillance on the presence and spread of Ae. koreicus in Italy. The survey started in 2011 from Valbelluna (Province of Belluno, northern Italy), where the first Ae. koreicus mosquitoes were found. A previous study reported that this species was well established in an area of 2600 km2 [4]. Since 2012, the monitoring has been extended in the whole Province of Belluno and in the neighbouring Provinces (Vicenza, Treviso, Trento, Pordenone and Verona). An additional monitoring was carried out in north-western Italy (Lombardia Region) in 2014, due to its proximity to another infested area in Switzerland [5]. All possible breeding sites, such as catch basins, man-made containers, tires and natural mosquito larval habitats were checked and the larvae collected. The places visited included private and public places (private gardens, garden centres and florists, tire markets, cemeteries, farms and houses). In addition, standard ovitraps and adults traps (BG-Sentinel™ traps baited with CO2 and lure) were used in some Provinces (Trento, Belluno, Vicenza and Sondrio). The collection sites were georeferenced. Mosquitoes were sampled from public areas according to the official guidelines of the Regional Health Authorities. Mosquitoes sampled from private areas were collected after verbal consensus of the owners.

The specimens were morphologically identified [6, 7]. In case of doubtful morphological identification or findings in new areas, a molecular confirmation was carried out using a PCR [8].

The current distribution (July 2015) of Ae. koreicus in northern Italy is reported in Fig. 1.
Fig. 1

Map of the municipalities monitored and positive sampling sites for the presence of Aedes koreicus in northern Italy, 2011–2015

Aedes koreicus was found in 73 municipalities out of 155 monitored (47.1 %) located in four Regions (Table 1). The mosquito was found in 23 municipalities (14.8 %) that were negative in 2011. Larvae were found mainly in artificial containers close to houses, in gardens and in places with stored materials. Compared to Ae. albopictus, Ae. koreicus was less present in catch basins and in areas totally urbanized (city/town centre). Aedes koreicus was found mainly in hilly and mountainous areas in a range of altitude between 42 m.a.s.l. (Polcenigo, Province of Pordenone, Lat 45°43′30.5″N; Long 11°54′37.7″E) and 1250 m.a.s.l. (Pedavena, Province of Belluno: Lat 46°04′12''; Long 11°50′31'').
Table 1

Municipalities monitored and positive for Aedes koreicus in northern Italy, 2011–2015

Region

Province

Municipalities monitored/present (%)

Municipalities positive/monitored for Ae. koreicus (%)

Veneto

Belluno

50/67 (75.4 %)

34/50 (68.0 %)

 

Treviso

26/95 (23.2 %)

14/26 (53.8 %)

 

Vicenza

15/121 (12.4 %)

8/15 (53.3 %)

 

Verona

4/98 (4.1 %)

1/4 (25.0 %)

Trentino Alto Adige

Trento

42/217 (19.3 %)

11/42 (26.2 %)

Friuli Venezia Giulia

Pordenone

8/50 (16.0 %)

3/8 (37.5 %)

Lombardia

Sondrio

1/78 (1.3 %)

1/1 (100.0 %)

 

Brescia

4/206 (1.9 %)

0/4 (0.0 %)

 

Bergamo

2/242 (0.8 %)

0/2 (0.0 %)

 

Lecco

1/88 (1.1 %)

0/1 (0.0 %)

 

Como

2/154 (0.6 %)

1/2 (50.0 %)

Total

 

155/1416 (10.9 %)

73/155 (47.1 %)

The location of the first detection in Italy (Province of Belluno) was also the most infested.

Several areas where Ae.koreicus is now present were not infested before 2012, such as seven municipalities in province of Belluno, three in province of Trento (west of initially infested part of Belluno) and six both in province of Vicenza and Treviso (south-west and south of initially infested part of Belluno). Moreover, unexpected new records scattered in a wide area of northern Italy were found in the last two years (Tavernerio and Sondrio, Lombardia Region; Cerro Veronese, Veneto Region, Caneva and Polcenigo, Friuli Venezia Giulia Region). The spread of Ae. koreicus seems to be faster towards south and west from its original and more infested area (Province of Belluno), likely due to the dense road connections and the habitat suitability of new areas. On the contrary, the distribution of Ae. koreicus in Belgium is still limited in a small area of 6 km2 [3].

It is not possible to track back the route of entry and the time of arrival of Ae. koreicus in this part of Italy. This species probably arrived in the province of Belluno where it was found for the first time and where the current density of population is the highest in the country. During the last years, the new records of Ae. koreicus in Italy could originate either from new introductions from its native range or dispersion from colonized areas, supported by human activities through private vehicles, public transport and/or freight. Previous introductions of IMS in USA and Europe suggest that the trade of used tires and plants is the main cause of invasion in a new area [9]. Through this way, new introductions of invasive Aedes species can be frequent as reported in The Netherlands [10].

There is little information on the factors that are driving the dispersal of Ae. koreicus. The probability of establishment and spread of IMS depends on environmental parameters, host availability and suitable climatic conditions [11]. The knowledge of these features is of particular importance to predict its future spread. Probably, the climate is not the only factor limiting the distribution in Europe since Korea, Belgium and northern Italy have similar climates [12].

Aedes koreicus is native to Korea, Japan, China and eastern Russia. Little information is available on this species, but recent studies are clarifying some aspect of its biology and ecology in the new-colonized areas [3, 4, 13]. Aedes koreicus is reported to feed on humans and domestic animals, and it seems to be well adapted to urban environment [13, 14]. Like other species belonging to genus Aedes, Ae. koreicus females lay eggs that can survive during the winter and hatch in the spring [15, 16]. In comparison with the Asian tiger mosquito, this species seems to be better adapted to colder temperature [16], a feature that likely favoured its establishment and survival in hilly and pre-alpine areas of Italy.

The results of our monitoring shows a large area of Ae. koreicus and Ae. albopictus co-habitation (Fig. 2; Additional file 1). Interspecific competition between Ae. koreicus and Ae. albopictus might occur in many areas with mild climate conditions as reported in other countries among invasive and native container-breeding mosquitoes [17]. Preliminary results of larval competition experiments in laboratory suggested that the development of Ae. koreicus might be negatively affected by the presence of Ae. albopictus (Frédéric Baldacchino, personal communication). In nature in our study, Ae. albopictus let a spatio-temporal gap to Ae. koreicus, avoiding larval competition as observed for Ae. japonicus [18]. Indeed, Ae. koreicus larvae are found early in the spring (approximately one month before Ae. albopictus larvae) and in areas too cold for Ae. albopictus where Ae. koreicus can occupy an empty niche.
Fig. 2

Map of municipalities positive for the presence of Aedes koreicus, Aedes albopictus and their overlapping areas in northern Italy, 2011–2015. The names of municipalities are available in the Additional file 1

The establishment of Ae. koreicus in an area where Ae. albopictus is already present has complicated the current entomological monitoring system, because larvae and adults are difficult to recognize and their eggs are practically indistinguishable.

Aedes koreicus has been suggested as a potential vector of arboviruses [19]. The species is reported to be involved in the transmission of the Japanese encephalitis virus, however without laboratory confirmation of its vector competence [20]. More evidences show that Ae. koreicus can transmit the dog heartworm, Dirofilaria immitis [21, 22].

According to these records, northern Italy has a high probability to be invaded by Ae. koreicus in the next decade. These data can be useful to validate predictive models of potential distribution and dispersal of this IMS in Italy or in other parts of Europe.

Therefore, early detection of IMS distribution is needed to prevent new establishments and to plan control actions. Unfortunately the eradication of an establish species is very unlikely [23].

Declarations

Acknowledgements

This work was funded by the Autonomous Province of Trento (Italy), research funds for Grandi Progetti, Project LExEM (Laboratory of Excellence for Epidemiology and Modelling, http//www.lexem.eu) and by the Veneto Region (project approved by DGRV 1519, 31/07/2012, BUR n.71 28/08/2010). The Authors would like to thank Stefania Cazzin and Silvia Ravagnan (IZSVe) for molecular identification of mosquitoes, Marco Dal Pont (ULSS1, Public Health Department), Nicola Delai (ULSS2, Public Health Department), and Nicola Ferro Milone (IZSVe) for their help in samplings.

Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.

Authors’ Affiliations

(1)
Istituto Zooprofilattico Sperimentale delle Venezie
(2)
Entostudio s.r.l
(3)
Istituto Zooprofilattico Sperimentale della Lombardia e dell’Emilia Romagna
(4)
Mosquito Control Laboratory, QIMR Berghofer Medical Research Institute
(5)
Queensland University of Technology
(6)
Department of Biodiversity and Molecular Ecology, Research and Innovation Centre, Fondazione Edmund Mach (FEM)

References

  1. Dalla Pozza G, Majori G. First record of Aedes albopictus establishment in Italy. J Am Mosq Control Assoc. 1992;8(3):318–20.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. Capelli G, Drago A, Martini S, Montarsi F, Soppelsa M, Delai N, et al. First report in Italy of the exotic mosquito species Aedes (Finlaya) koreicus, a potential vector of arboviruses and filariae. Parasit Vectors. 2011;4:188.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. Versteirt V, De Clercq EM, Fonseca DM, Pecor J, Schaffner F, Coosemans M, et al. Bionomics of the established exotic mosquito species Aedes koreicus in Belgium, Europe. J Med Entomol. 2012;49(6):1226–32.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. Montarsi F, Martini S, Dal Pont M, Delai N, Ferro Milone N, Mazzucato M, et al. Distribution and habitat characterization of the recently introduced invasive mosquito Aedes koreicus [Hulecoeteomyia koreica], a new potential vector and pest in north-eastern Italy. Parasit Vectors. 2013;6:292.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. Suter T, Flacio E, Fariña BF, Engeler L, Tonolla M, Müller P. First report of the invasive mosquito species Aedes koreicus in the Swiss-Italian border region. Parasit Vectors. 2015;8:402.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. Edwards FW. Notes on Culicidae with descriptions of new species. Bull Entomol Research. 1917;7:201–229.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  7. Schaffner F, Bellini R, Petrić D, Scholte EJ. European centre for disease prevention and control. Guidelines for the surveillance of invasive mosquitoes in Europe. Stockholm: ECDC; 2012. http://ecdc.europa.eu/en/publications/Publications/TER-Mosquito-surveillance-guidelines.pdf.Google Scholar
  8. Cameron EC, Wilkerson RC, Mogi M, Miyagi I, Toma T, Kim HC, et al. Molecular phylogenetics of Aedes japonicus, a disease vector that recently invaded Western Europe, North America, and the Hawaiian islands. J Med Entomol. 2010;47(4):527–35.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. Schaffner F, Kaufmann C, Hegglin D, Mathis A. The invasive mosquito Aedes japonicus in Central Europe. Med Vet Entomol. 2009;23(4):448–51.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. Scholte EJ, Den Hartog W, Dik M, Schoelitsz B, Brooks M, Schaffner F, Foussadier R, Braks M, Beeuwkes J. Introduction and control of three invasive mosquito species in the Netherlands, July-October 2010. Euro Surveill. 2010;15(45).Google Scholar
  11. Petrić D, Bellini R, Scholte EJ, Rakotoarivony LM, Schaffner F. Monitoring population and environmental parameters of invasive mosquito species in Europe. Parasit Vectors. 2014;7:187.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. Medlock JM, Hansford KM, Versteirt V, Cull B, Kampen H, Fontenille D, et al. An entomological review of invasive mosquitoes in Europe. Bull Entomol Res. 2015;25:1–27.Google Scholar
  13. Montarsi F, Drago A, Dal Pont M, Delai N, Carlin S, Cazzin S, Ciocchetta S, Arnoldi D, Baldacchino F, Rizzoli A, Russo F, Capelli G. Current knowledge on the distribution and biology of the recently introduced invasive mosquito Aedes koreicus (Diptera: Culicidae). Firenze (Italy): Atti Accademia Nazionale Italiana di Entomologia; 2014. Anno LXII:169–174.Google Scholar
  14. Tanaka K, Mizusawa K, Saugstad ES. A revision of the adult and larval mosquitoes of Japan (including the Ryukyu Archipelago and the Ogasawara islands) and Korea (Diptera: Culicidae). Contrib Am Entomol Inst (ann Arbor). 1979;16:1–987.Google Scholar
  15. Knight KL. The Aedes (Finlaya) chrysolineatus group of mosquitoes (Diptera: Culicidae). Ithaca, New York: Annals of the Entomological Society of America; 1947. Vol XL (4):624–649.Google Scholar
  16. Miyagi I. Notes on the Aedes (Finlaya) chrysolineatus Subgroup in Japan and Korea (Diptera: Culicidae). Tropical Medicine. 1971;13(3):141–51.Google Scholar
  17. Rochlin I, Ninivaggi DV, Hutchinson ML, Farajollahi A. Climate change and range expansion of the Asian tiger mosquito (Aedes Albopictus) in northeastern USA: implications for public health practitioners. PLoS One. 2013;8(4), e60874.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. Kaufman MG, Fonseca DM. Invasion biology of Aedes japonicus japonicus (Diptera: Culicidae). Annu Rev Entomol. 2015;59:31–49.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  19. Schaffner F, Medlock JM, Van Bortel W. Public health significance of invasive mosquitoes in Europe. Clin Microbiol Infect. 2013;19(8):685–92.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. Takashima I, Rosen L. Horizontal and vertical transmission of Japanese encephalitis virus by Aedes japonicus (Diptera: Culicidae). J Med Entomol. 1989;26(5):454–8.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. Feng LC.  Experiments with Dirofilaria immitis and local species of mosquitoes in Peiping, North China. Ann Trop Med Parasit 1930, 24:347–366.Google Scholar
  22. Montarsi F, Ciocchetta S, Devine G, Ravagnan S, Mutinelli F, Frangipane Di Regalbono A, et al. Development of Dirofilaria immitis within the mosquito Aedes (Finlaya) koreicus, a new invasive species for Europe. Parasit Vectors. 2015;8:177.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. Dunn AM, Hatcher MJ. Parasites and biological invasions: parallels, interactions, and control. Trends Parasitol. 2015;31(5):189–99.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright

© Montarsi et al. 2015

Comments

By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.

Advertisement