Open Access

The characterization and manipulation of the bacterial microbiome of the Rocky Mountain wood tick, Dermacentor andersoni

Contributed equally
Parasites & Vectors20158:632

https://doi.org/10.1186/s13071-015-1245-z

Received: 9 October 2015

Accepted: 3 December 2015

Published: 10 December 2015

Abstract

Background

In North America, ticks are the most economically impactful vectors of human and animal pathogens. The Rocky Mountain wood tick, Dermacentor andersoni (Acari: Ixodidae), transmits Rickettsia rickettsii and Anaplasma marginale to humans and cattle, respectively. In recent years, studies have shown that symbiotic organisms are involved in a number of biochemical and physiological functions. Characterizing the bacterial microbiome of D. andersoni is a pivotal step towards understanding symbiont-host interactions.

Findings

In this study, we have shown by high-throughput sequence analysis that the composition of endosymbionts in the midgut and salivary glands in adult ticks is dynamic over three generations. Four Proteobacteria genera, Rickettsia, Francisella, Arsenophonus, and Acinetobacter, were identified as predominant symbionts in these two tissues. Exposure to therapeutic doses of the broad-spectrum antibiotic, oxytetracycline, affected both proportions of predominant genera and significantly reduced reproductive fitness. Additionally, Acinetobacter, a free-living ubiquitous microbe, invaded the bacterial microbiome at different proportions based on antibiotic treatment status suggesting that microbiome composition may have a role in susceptibility to environmental contaminants.

Conclusions

This study characterized the bacterial microbiome in D. andersoni and determined the generational variability within this tick. Furthermore, this study confirmed that microbiome manipulation is associated with tick fitness and may be a potential method for biocontrol.

Keywords

Ticks Microbiome Endosymbiont

Findings

Background

The presence of diverse microbial communities within multicellular organisms has been well documented, consisting of bacteria, protozoans, filarial nematodes, fungi, and viruses [1, 2]. These microbes have formed symbiotic relationships with their hosts, which can be commensal, mutualistic, or parasitic [3]. Symbiont literature defines primary endosymbionts as having an obligate relationship essential for the fitness of the host, whereas secondary symbionts are microbes that have likely become associated via horizontal transmission through environmental exposure [46]. Although secondary symbionts are less likely to provide an essential benefit to the host, their function within the microbiome and benefit to the host is not fully understood [7, 8]. On an ecological level, the microbiome is an active community that involves symbiont-symbiont interactions as well as symbiont-host communication. Primary and secondary endosymbiont theory is well documented for insect hosts, however it is unknown if these relationships hold for ticks.

Hard ticks (Acari: Ixodidae) are among the world’s leading vectors of diseases in humans and livestock and are second only to mosquitos in overall impact on global health [9, 10]. The Rocky Mountain wood tick, Dermacentor andersoni, transmits a number of pathogens including the etiological agents of Rocky Mountain spotted fever and bovine anaplasmosis. The three genera of bacterial endosymbionts that have been associated with D. andersoni ticks include: Arsenophonus, Francisella, and Rickettsia [7, 1114]. While forays into high throughput characterization of the bacterial microbiome in ticks have been undertaken in recent years, the composition of the microbiome in D. andersoni, including the microbial associations within the midgut and salivary glands (the relevant organs for acquisition and transmission of pathogens) remains unknown [1, 15].

Treatment with antibiotics has previously been shown to be a useful approach to study the roles of endosymbionts within their hosts [4, 16]. A recent study showed that direct injection of tetracycline or rifampicin into Amblyomma americanum, reduced the bacterial load of a Coxiella species, an endosymbiont known to be trans-stadially transmitted, and led to reduced reproductive fitness [4]. While this study did not involve a generational analysis, a reduction in the number of larvae that survived in the treated groups resulted in fewer ticks that survived to reproductive maturity.

The stability in the composition of both core and minor endosymbionts varies between systems; though there have been a growing number of tick microbiome studies [17, 18], little is known about the microbiome of D. andersoni, and specifically if it is possible to manipulate the microbiome of this species. Is the composition of the endosymbiont population of D. andersoni stable over time? Is it possible to manipulate the bacterial microbiome of D. andersoni through antibiotic treatment and will this affect the fitness of the tick? To address these questions, we employed a high-throughput sequencing approach to characterize the bacterial microbiome of two D. andersoni tissues, the midgut (MG) and salivary glands (SG) over three generations (T1, T2, and T3) as well as studying the effects of antibiotic treatment on the microbiome.

Methods

Ethical approval

Tick rearing and animal experiments were carried out under guidelines approved by the Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee (Washington State University IACUC #04440-004 and University of Idaho IACUC #2013-66).

Experimental design

The USDA, ARS Animal Disease Research Unit located at the Holm Research Center at the University of Idaho in Moscow, Idaho maintains a colony of D. andersoni ticks that originated from Reynolds Creek, Idaho (RC). Larvae were fed using Sprague–Dawley rats and nymphs and adults were fed on Holstein cattle. The bacterial microbiome of adult male ticks, which are the principle vector of Anaplasma marginale, was characterized over three generations (T1-T3 cohorts, Fig. 1). One male cohort from the T2 generation was fed on an untreated (normal) calf, while the second cohort was exposed to oxytetracycline by allowing them to feed on an antibiotic-treated calf. The antibiotic-treated calf was subcutaneously dosed with 11 mg/ kg body weight of Liquamycin (LA-200, Zoetis, Florham Park, NJ) on days −4, −1, 3, and 7-days post-infestation, which was a therapeutic dosing regime that might be used to treat an infection. Male ticks from this group were fed for 7 days and then MG and SG were dissected. A colony of ticks was established from the treated cohort to follow the microbiome for two generations (T2TX and T3TX).
Fig. 1

Experimental design. A cohort of ticks was sampled from the laboratory colony (designated T1). The colony was reared for 1 generation and then split into 2 cohorts; one cohort was exposed to oxytetracycline during feeding (designated T2TX) and the other was fed on an untreated calf (designated T2). Following exposure, each group of ticks were reared one generation and fed as adults on untreated calves prior to dissection (designated T3 and T3TX)

For characterization of the microbiome, 90 fed male ticks from each treatment group were surface sterilized by rinsing in 5 % EtOH and 5 % bleach water solution, followed by a double rinse in H20. The MG and SG were then dissected and pooled in groups of 30 ticks with three biological replicates, with each biological replicate analyzed in triplicate. Genomic DNA was isolated using the PureGene Extraction Kit (Qiagen, Germantown, MD). PCR amplification was performed using barcoded sample-specific primers [19] targeting variable region 4 of the 16S ribosomal DNA gene (primers E517F and E806Rm) and the PCR products submitted for Roche 454 GS FLX Titanium pyrosequencing [1]. The resulting reads were processed in CLC Genomics Workbench, Black Box Chimera Check (B2C2), and RDP Classifier [20, 21]. Sequence reads below a Phred score threshold of 20 and shorter than 100 bases were discarded. Sequence data was deposited in the sequence read archive at NCBI (SRP063991). PCR assays were employed for the major endosymbionts to discriminate at the species level: rOmpA for Rickettsia (primers Rr190.70p and Rr190.602n) [22] and 16S rDNAfor Francisella (primers 61 F and 1227 F) [23].

In order to determine if microbiome manipulation through antibiotic exposure influenced the fitness of ticks, we measured several fitness parameters of the T3 and T3TX colonies (Table 1). The colonies were subsampled and the parameters that were analyzed included: larval survival, fed larval weight, larva-nymph molt, nymphal feeding success, fed nymphal weight, and nymph-adult molt. Pair-wise comparisons were used to determine fitness differences between groups using SPSS (IBM V. 20).
Table 1

Reproductive fitness of offspring of D. andersoni ticks from T3 and T3TX colonies

 

Untreated Ticks (T3)

Treated Ticks (T3TX)

Total larvae at start

3000

3000

Larval survival

40 %

15 %**

Mean fed larval weight

0.521 mg

0.487 mg*

Larva-nymph molt

83.7 %

77.8 %*

Total nymphs

908

271

Nymphal feeding success

50.7 % (460/908)

42.4 % (116/271)

Mean fed nymphal weight

11.7 mg

11.4 mg

Nymph-adult molt

97.4 %

98.3 %

Total adults

448

114

*p <0.05;**p < 0.001

Results and discussion

This study presents an in-depth characterization of the bacterial microbiome of D. andersoni. Sequencing of 16S rDNA allowed us to elucidate the composition of the bacterial microbiome of MG and SG in male ticks over three generations, as well as how antibiotic exposure alters the microflora (Fig. 1). Using high-throughput pyrosequencing, we obtained a mean of 47,554 reads/sample with an average length of 288 bp/read. Our results showed that the predominant taxa of bacteria in MG were Arsenophonus, Francisella, and Rickettsia in T1 and T2 populations, with Acinetobacter, an environmental contaminant, becoming a predominant taxon in T3 (Fig. 2). In SG, the predominant taxa included Arsenophonus and Rickettsia in T1 and T2 cohorts with Acinetobacter and Francisella becoming established in T3 (Fig. 2). Proportions of Arsenophonus and Francisella were relatively stable from T1 to T2 in both MG and SGs, whereas the Rickettsia proportion varied between T1 and T2 in both MGs and SGs.
Fig. 2

Microbiome composition of the midgut and salivary glands of adult male ticks over time and in response to antibiotics. a The microbiome of the midgut (MG) and b the microbiome of the salivary glands (SG). Predominant genera include Acinetobacter (light blue), Arsenophonus (red), Francisella (green), and Rickettsia (purple). Minor genera are represented by Other (yellow) and Unclassified reads are represented in orange. T1, T2, and T3 refer to the generation of the ticks after sampling the colony. T2TX refers to the cohort of T2 ticks that were exposed to oxytetracycline while T3TX are the progeny of these ticks

We exposed a cohort of T2 ticks to antibiotics and evaluated the response of the bacterial microbiome as well as tick fitness. Our results showed that the proportions and diversity of bacteria within the microbiome changed when exposed to Oxytetracycline (Fig. 2). Antibiotic exposure caused a 30 % decrease in the relative proportion of Arsenophonus in the SGs and resulted in a nearly fourfold increase of Rickettsia when compared to the untreated microbiome. In the MGs of treated ticks (T2TX), the proportions of the predominant genera, Arsenophonus, Francisella, and Rickettsia, appear to have only been moderately affected (Fig. 2). Furthermore, Acinetobacter proportion expanded in both the MG and SG of both T3 and T3TX. Acinetobacter accounted for less than 0.01 % of the microbiome of T2TX, but in the T3 generation, Acinetobacter accounted for more than one third of the sequences in T3 SGs and nearly one hundred percent of reads in treated (T3TX) SGs. Acinetobacter was also identified in T3 and T3TX MGs but was much less predominant (<6 % of total reads). Acinetobacter is a known environmental contaminate and commonly found in soil; thus, a possible source of exposure was the time on the cattle. Although it has been demonstrated that the host does not influence the bacterial microbiome of ticks [17, 24], there has yet to be a study analyzing the impact of the host’s microbial community at the feeding site.

Interestingly, the response to Acinetobacter invasion was different in treated ticks when compared to untreated ticks, with T3TX ticks having about twice as much Acinetobacter as T3 ticks, regardless of tissue. This suggests that vulnerability to invading endosymbionts varies, perhaps by limiting factors within the microbiome that affect bacterial interaction. These limiting factors may be physical space, nutrient availability, or a more direct cause, such as a bacterium producing a deterrent. Disrupting the microbiome appears to have resulted in an increased susceptibility to Acinetobacter.

Because species level discrimination was not possible with 454 pyrosequencing we employed PCR assays for Rickettsia and Francisella classification. Using rOmpA primers identified R. peacockii and R. rhipicephali in all MG samples, with the exception of T3TX. R. rhipicephali was found in all SG samples except T3TX. Furthermore, R. rhipicephali, R. philipii, R. peacockii, and R. marmionii were found in both treated and untreated MG and SG samples, with R. bellii identified only in T2TX-MG. In both MG and SG samples, the Francisella-like endosymbiont (FLE) previously detected in both D. andersoni and D. occidentalis (GenBank accession no. AY375397.1 and AY375402.1, respectively) was identified. These findings are consistent with previous studies that have shown that D. andersoni ticks are colonized by rickettsial endosymbionts [13, 25] in addition to FLE [7, 12] and Arsenophonus [11]. These genera of bacteria are known to be transmitted transovarially and thus fit the definition of primary endosymbionts.

The second aspect of the antibiotic exposure study was to examine reproductive fitness of D. andersoni to see if there was an association between the changes in the microbiome and fitness. We saw significant reductions of fitness in the treated tick colony (T3TX) at several life stages (Table 1). There was a 25 % lower larval survival after feeding in T3TX ticks as compared to the untreated (T3) group (p < 0.01). Mean larval weight after feeding was significantly reduced in T3TX ticks (p < 0.05) as was the survival after the larva-nymphal molt (p < 0.05). While there was no significant decrease in mean nymphal weight or nymph to adult molt, the total number of treated ticks surviving to adulthood was 25 % that of untreated ticks (Table 1). Antibiotic-exposed ticks were less competent at survival, feeding, and molting. Our results support findings in A. americanum ticks where there was significant reduction in fitness post-antibiotic exposure [4]. Although it is unclear how the observed changes in the microbiome could impact fitness, the sequence data indicates that antibiotic exposure had a measurable impact on the microbiome.

Conclusions

This study has identified the major endosymbionts found in D. andersoni ticks and demonstrates microbiome volatility over time. Additionally, we have shown that the microbiome can be influenced by antibiotic exposure, and that these changes vary by tissue. Our findings suggest that disturbance to the microbiome may result in an increased vulnerability to microbial invasion by environmental microbes. These conclusions are the first steps in understanding the relationships between endosymbionts and D. andersoni and these data suggest that further investigation into the function of the microbiome is warranted [46].

Notes

Abbreviations

T1-T3: 

generation 1, 2, and 3

T2TX: 

generation 2 and exposed to antibiotics

T3TX: 

generation 3, progeny of antibiotic-exposed ticks

MG: 

midgut

SG: 

salivary glands

Declarations

Acknowledgements

We would like to thank Ralph Horn, James Allison, Xiaoya Cheng, and Sara Davis for technical assistance. This work was supported by NIH AI4405,USDA-ARS-CRIS5348-32000-033-00D, NIH/NIGMS-funded predoctoral fellowship (T32 GM008336), an NSF ADVANCE transitions grant, and CVM intramural funds.

Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.

Authors’ Affiliations

(1)
School of Molecular Biosciences, Washington State University
(2)
Department of Veterinary Microbiology and Pathology, Paul G. Allen School for Global Animal Health, Washington State University
(3)
Animal Disease Research Unit, U.S. Department of Agriculture, Agricultural Research Service, Washington State University

References

  1. Andreotti R, de León AAP, Dowd SE, Guerrero FD, Bendele KG, Scoles GA. Assessment of bacterial diversity in the cattle tick Rhipicephalus (Boophilus) microplus through tag-encoded pyrosequencing. BMC Microbiology. 2011;11:6–6.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. Wang Y, Gilbreath 3rd TM, Kukutla P, Yan G, Xu J. Dynamic gut microbiome across life history of the malaria mosquito Anopheles gambiae in Kenya. PloS one. 2011;6:e24767.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. Telford III SR. Status of the “East Side Hypothesis” (Transovarial Interference) 25 Years Later. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences. 2009;1166:144–50.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. Zhong J, Jasinskas A, Barbour AG. Antibiotic Treatment of the Tick Vector Amblyomma americanum Reduced Reproductive Fitness. PLoS ONE. 2007;2:e405.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. Brouqui P. Arthropod-borne diseases associated with political and social disorder. Annual review of entomology. 2011;56:357–74.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. Ahantarig A, Trinachartvanit W, Baimai V, Grubhoffer L. Hard ticks and their bacterial endosymbionts (or would be pathogens). Folia Microbiol. 2013;58(5):419–28.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  7. Niebylski ML, Peacock MG, Fischer ER, Porcella SF, Schwan TG. Characterization of an endosymbiont infecting wood ticks, Dermacentor andersoni, as a member of the genus Francisella. Applied and Environmental Microbiology. 1997;63:3933–40.PubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. Perlman SJ, Hunter MS, Zchori-Fein E. The emerging diversity of Rickettsia. Proc Biol Sci. 2006;273:2097–106.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. Klyachko O, Stein BD, Grindle N, Clay K, Fuqua C. Localization and visualization of a coxiella-type symbiont within the lone star tick, Amblyomma americanum. Applied and environmental microbiology. 2007;73:6584–94.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. Parola P, Raoult D. Ticks and tickborne bacterial diseases in humans: an emerging infectious threat. Clinical infectious diseases : an official publication of the Infectious Diseases Society of America. 2001;32:897–928.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  11. Dergousoff SJ, Chilton NB. Detection of a new Arsenophonus-type bacterium in Canadian populations of the Rocky Mountain wood tick, Dermacentor andersoni. Experimental & applied acarology. 2010;52:85–91.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  12. Scoles GA. Phylogenetic analysis of the Francisella-like endosymbionts of Dermacentor ticks. Journal of Medical Entomology. 2004;41:277–86.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. Niebylski ML, Schrumpf ME, Burgdorfer W, Fischer ER, Gage KL, Schwan TG. Rickettsia peacockii sp. nov., a new species infecting wood ticks, Dermacentor andersoni, in western Montana. Int J SystBacteriol. 1997;47:446–52.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  14. Dergousoff SJ, Chilton NB. Association of different genetic types of Francisella-like organisms with the rocky mountain wood tick (Dermacentor andersoni) and the American dog tick (Dermacentor variabilis) in localities near their northern distributional limits. Applied and environmental microbiology. 2012;78:965–71.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. Menchaca AC, Visi DK, Strey OF, Teel PD, Kalinowski K, Allen MS, et al. Preliminary assessment of microbiome changes following blood-feeding and survivorship in the Amblyomma americanum nymph-to-adult transition using semiconductor sequencing. PLoS ONE. 2013;8:e67129–9.Google Scholar
  16. Bandi C, McCall JW, Genchi C, Corona S, Venco L, Sacchi L. Effects of tetracycline on the filarial worms Brugia pahangi and Dirofilaria immitis and their bacterial endosymbionts Wolbachia. International journal for parasitology. 1999;29:357–64.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. Rynkiewicz EC, Hemmerich C, Rusch DB, Fuqua C, Clay K. Concordance of bacterial communities of two tick species and blood of their shared rodent host. Journal of Molecular Ecology. 2015;24:2566–79.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. Van Treuren W, Ponnusamy L, Brinkerhoff RJ, Gonzalez A, Parobek CM, Juliano JJ, et al. Variation in the microbiota of Ixodes ticks with regard to geography, species, and sex. Applied Environmental Microbiology. 2015;81:6200–9.Google Scholar
  19. Wang Y, Qian PY. Conservative fragments in bacterial 16S rRNA genes and primer design for 16S ribosomal DNA amplicons in metagenomic studies. PloS one. 2009;4:e7401.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. Gontcharova V, Youn E, Wolcott RD, Hollister EB, Gentry TJ, Dowd SE. Black Box Chimera Check (B2C2): a Windows-Based Software for Batch Depletion of Chimeras from Bacterial 16S rRNA Gene Datasets. The open microbiology journal. 2010;4:47–52.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. Cole JR, Wang Q, Cardenas E, Fish J, Chai B, Farris RJ, et al. The Ribosomal Database Project: improved alignments and new tools for rRNA analysis. Nucleic Acids Research. 2009;37(Database):D141–5.Google Scholar
  22. Regnery RL, Spruill CL, Plikaytis BD. Genotypic identification of rickettsiae and estimation of intraspecies sequence divergence for portions of two rickettsial genes. Journal of Bacteriology. 1991;173:1576–89.PubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. Sun LV, Scoles GA, Fish D, O'Neill SL. Francisella-like endosymbionts of ticks. J Invertebr Pathol. 2000;76:301–3.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. Hawlena H, Rynkiewicz E, Toh E, Alfred A, Durden LA, Hastriter MW, et al. The arthropod, but not the vertebrate host or its environment, dictates bacterial community composition of fleas and ticks. The ISME Journal. 2013;7:221–3.Google Scholar
  25. Philip RN, Casper EA. Serotypes of spotted fever group rickettsiae isolated from Dermacentor andersoni (Stiles) ticks in western Montana. The American journal of tropical medicine and hygiene. 1981;30:230–8.PubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright

© Clayton et al. 2015

Comments

By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.

Advertisement