Open Access

SjTat-TPI facilitates adaptive T-cell responses and reduces hepatic pathology during Schistosoma japonicum infection in BALB/c mice

  • Wenyue Zhang1,
  • Xiaofeng Luo1,
  • Fan Zhang1,
  • Yuxiao Zhu1,
  • Bingya Yang1, 2,
  • Min Hou1,
  • Zhipeng Xu1, 2,
  • Chuanxin Yu3,
  • Yingying Chen1,
  • Lin Chen1, 2 and
  • Minjun Ji1, 2Email author
Parasites & Vectors20158:664

https://doi.org/10.1186/s13071-015-1275-6

Received: 30 September 2015

Accepted: 18 December 2015

Published: 30 December 2015

Abstract

Background

Schistosomiasis is a kind of parasitic zoonoses which causes serious damage to public health and social development. China is one of the countries most affected by Schistosoma japonicum and an effective vaccine is still needed. In this study, we adopted Tat-mediated protein transduction technology to investigate the impact of different antigen presented approaches on host’s immune response and the potential protection against Schistosoma japonicum infection.

Results

We successfully constructed the recombinant S. japonicum triosephosphate isomerase, Tat-TPI, as a vaccine candidate. Whether injected with Tat-TPI in foot pad or vaccinated with Tat-TPI in the back subcutaneously for three times, the draining popliteal lymph nodes and spleen both developed a stronger CD8+T response (Tc1) in mice. Not only that, but it also helped CD4+T cells to produce more IFN-γ than TPI immunisation. In addition, it could boost IgG production, especially IgG1 subclass. Most importantly, Tat-TPI immunisation led to the significant smaller area of a single egg granuloma in the livers as compared with TPI-vaccinated or control groups. However, the anti-infection efficiency induced by Tat-TPI was still restricted.

Conclusion

This study indicated that immunisation with Tat-fused TPI could contribute to enhance CD4+T-cell response and decrease hepatic egg granulomatous area after S. japonicum infection though it did not achieve our expected protection against Schistosoma japonicum infection. The optimal vaccine strategy warrants further research.

Keywords

Schistosoma japonicum VaccineTh1Tc1Triosephosphate isomerasHIV Tat

Background

Schistosomiasis is still a significant public health problem in tropical and subtropical regions [1]. Although in the past six decades, a series of comprehensive measures have been adopted to control schistosomiasis japonica in China, there remain many challenges we need to face. According to conservative estimates, about 0.29 million people are infected and more than 240 million people living in 180 counties remain endemic for S. japonicum in China today [2]. Transmitted by Oncomelania hupensis, S. japonicum could cause serious pathology damage to the liver and intestine. Praziquantel is the effective drug for treatment, but it does not prevent post-treatment reinfection and long-term application might lead to increase the drug resistance [3, 4]. Some other measures including environmental and health-care management and snail control have achieved great success in controlling, but the factors of reinfection, such as many reservoir hosts, still exist [5]. Therefore, development of safe and effective vaccines, especially for veterinary use, is a high priority.

The radiation-attenuated (RA) vaccine can induce high protection against schistosome infection in many experimental animal models [6, 7]. However, the requirement of large amounts of cercariae, potential side effects and the risk of reinfection limited its application in the population. Our previous experiments showed that three vaccinations with RA cercariae could induce high levels of worm reduction rate (77.62 %) and hepatic egg reduction rate (88.8 %) in pigs [7]. In this case, antibody and CD4+T-cell-mediated, IFN-γ-dependent effector mechanisms are the important reason for high protection [810]. We also found that about one week after immunisation with RA cercariae, some gene expression of killer factors like granzymes and IFN-γ was enhanced in the skin draining lymph nodes. This implies that CD8+T-cells might be related to radiation-induced high protection. Similarly, Pancré et al. found that CTL response caused by CD8+T-cells could participate in the protection mechanism against S. mansoni infection [11, 12]. Thus, we expect that the cooperation between CD8+T cells, CD4+T cells and IgG responses would achieve an effective protection against schistosomiasis.

Triosephosphate isomerase (TPI) is one of the World Health Organisation (WHO) recommended schistosome vaccine candidate molecules. It is a kind of glycolytic enzyme, involved in the process of glucose metabolism [13]. TPI is distributed in all developmental stages of schistosome life-cycle. It was reported that SjTPI immunised mice together with Freund's adjuvant induce a 57.8 % liver egg reduction rate [14], while DNA vaccines containing the optimised SjTPI gene (SjTPI.opt) was able to induce 36–39 % reductions in worm burden [13, 15]. Protein transduction domain (PTDs), also known as cell-permeable peptides (CPPs), refers to a class of small (<20 amino acids), relatively nontoxic peptides, which are capable of not only crossing the cell membrane themselves but also carrying many various small molecules into cells, including siRNA, plasmid DNA, combinant proteins, viruses and other different nanoparticles [16]. Tat, the HIV transactivator of transcription protein, is the most widely used PTDs. Tat-fused protein could efficiently transduce dendritic cells (DCs) and was processed by proteasomes for MHC class I-dependent presentation to CD8+T lymphocytes [17]. In this study, we evaluated the immunogenicity and efficacy of the fusion protein containing the protein transduction domain of HIV-1 TAT and the Schistosoma japonicum antigen Sj-TPI in a mouse model. The approach we used was to express this fused antigen to facilitate the entry of protein into cells and enhance CD4+ and CD8+ T-cell response.

Methods

Ethics statement

The animal experiments were approved by the Nanjing Medical University Animal Ethics Committee. All the mice were subjected to minimum suffering.

Animals and parasites

Female BALB/c mice, 6–8 week-old, were obtained from Comparative Medicine Center of Yangzhou University (Yangzhou, China) and kept in specific pathogen-free environment for experimental use. Snails infected with Schistosoma japonicum (a Chinese strain of S. japonicum-infected Oncomelania hupensis) were purchased from the Jiangsu Institute of Parasitic Diseases (Wuxi, China). Cercariae were collected from infected snails.

Prokaryotic expression vector construction and expression of the fusion protein Tat-TPI and TPI

The plasmid, pcDNA3.1-SjTPI.opt [15, 18], containing the optimised triosephosphate isomerase gene of S. japonicum, was provided by the Jiangsu Institute of Parasitic Diseases (Wuxi, China). Then according to the nucleic acid sequences of Tat-TPI and TPI, the following primers were designed: (i) Tat-TPI: forward primer: 5’-CGC GGA TCC TAT GGC AGG AAG AAG CGG AGA CAG CGA CGA AGA AGC AGC AGC CGG AAG TT-3’; (ii) TPI, forward primer: 5’-CGC GGA TCC AGC AGC AGC CGG AAG TT-3’; (iii) reverse primers for Tat-TPI and TPI: 5’-CCC AAG CTT TCA CTG CCG GGC CTT G-3’. The gene fragments of Tat-TPI and TPI were amplified by PCR. These two genes were respectively cloned into the His-tagged protein downstream of expression vector pET-32a(+) and the recombinant plasmids pET-32a(+)-Tat-TPI and pET-32a(+)-TPI were obtained. The recombinant plasmids were transformed into E. coli strain BMRosetta (DE3) for protein expression. After induced expression by IPTG for 4 h at 25 °C and subsequent purification with Ni-NTA Sepharose FF, the purified fusion protein Tat-TPI and TPI were obtained.

Immune reaction of the draining lymph nodes

To ascertain the immune response induced by TAT-coupled protein in mice, mouse foot pads of each group were injected subcutaneously with 50 μg Tat-TPI, TPI in 20 μl PBS per side, respectively. Negative controls were injected with isometric PBS. The draining popliteal lymph nodes were aseptically removed 4 days after vaccination, then lymphocytes were prepared for flow cytometry detection. The experiments were duplicated twice.

Antibody-blocking assay

In order to understand the effect of CD8+T cells on CD4+T-cell response, we performed antibody blocking experiments in vitro. The single spleen cell suspensions were incubated in 24-well flat-bottom plates (1 ml/well, 2 × 106 cells/ml). For CD8+T cells blocking experiments, spleen T cells were treated with 5 mg/ml of anti-mouse CD8a antibody (BioLegend, 100735, Canada) or isotype control antibody IgG2a for 1 h at 37 °C. Then Tat-TPI, TPI (100 mg/ml) and PBS were added, respectively, and incubated at 37 °C, 5 % CO2. After 18 h incubation, T cells were restimulated for 6 h at 37 °C in 5 % CO2 with 2 μl Leukocyte Activation Cocktail (BD Biosciences). Finally, cells were collected for flow cytometry detection of Th1 expression. The experiments were repeated four times.

Animal immunisation and challenge experiment

Mice were randomly divided into four groups (20 mice/group). The antigens Tat-TPI and TPI were administered subcutaneously (100 μg/mice) emulsified in the same volume of incomplete Freund’s adjuvant (IFA) per mouse in corresponding groups on days 1, 14 and 28. The other two groups were injected isopyknic IFA and PBS with the same immune process. Two weeks after the third immunisation, eight mice in each group were sacrificed for flow cytometry assay and serum samples were collected for antibody analysis. The remaining mice were percutaneously challenged with 40 ± 1 S. japonicum cercariae. All animals were sacrificed at 6 weeks post-infection and parasite burden, T-cell responses were observed. Parasite burden was evaluated by adult worm recovery, egg burdens and area of single egg granuloma in the livers. Briefly, the adult worms were collected and counted after perfusion of the portal vein with PBS. Meanwhile, the liver was isolated, weighed and digested with 10 ml 5 % KOH at 37 °C for 24 h and eggs counted in 10 μl liver digest solution. Each liver sample was counted 3 times and the mean count was used as eggs per gram (EPG) in mice. The sectioned liver tissue (1–5 cm3) were fixed in 4 % paraformaldehyde, embedded in paraffin and stained with haematoxilin and eosin, according to standard protocols. Single-egg granulomas were examined and their sizes were calculated using AxioVision Rel 4.7 (Carl Zeiss GmbH, Jena, Germany). At least fifteen single egg granulomas per liver section were photographed. Additionally, the percentage of Th1 and Tc1 in the spleens was detected by flow cytometry.

Measurement of specific antibodies response

ELISA was applied to detect schistosome-specific antibody responses. Briefly, 96-well plates (Costar) were coated with TPI (10 μg/ml) at 4 °C overnight, then washed 5 times with PBS-0.05 % Tween-20 (PBST) and blocked in PBST-5 % skimmed milk at 37 °C for 2 h. After washing 5 times again, each well was incubated with 100 μl sera samples diluted 1:100 with PBS for 2 h at 37 °C. Next, plates were washed with PBST and incubated with 100 μl HRP-conjugated goat-anti-mouse IgG, IgG1 and IgG2a (diluted 1:5000, Biosharp) for 1 h at 37 °C. Lastly, after five washes with PBST, each well plate was developed with 100 μl tetramethylbenzidine (TMB, 10 mg/ml) for 20 min at 37 °C and the reaction was stopped by adding 50 μl H2SO4 (2 M). The optical density (OD) was read at 450 nm using an ELISA reader (Bio-TEK, USA).

Flow cytometry detection

Flow cytometry was used to analyse the percentages of Th1, Th2, Tc1, Tc2 in the draining popliteal lymph nodes or spleens after immunisation or infection ex vivo and in vitro CD8+T cell-blocking experiment. Single cell suspensions were prepared by collecting the cells after anti-CD8 antibody blocking, or grinding popliteal lymph nodes or spleens in incomplete RPMI 1 × 1640 medium (WISENT, Canada) followed by red blood cell (RBC) lysis, then 2 × 106 cells per ml were stimulated for 6 h at 37 °C in 5 % CO2 with 2 μl Leukocyte Activation Cocktail with BD GolgiPlug (BD Biosciences, USA) in 24-well plates (1 ml/well). Next, 1 × 106 cells were stained in 100 μl of Staining Buffer [PBS containing 1 % FBS (Gibco, USA)] with following fluorochrome-conjugated monoclonal antibodies specific for surface antigen: CD3e-APC (BD Biosciences), CD4-FITC (BD Biosciences), CD8a-FITC (BD Biosciences), APC-labelled Hamster IgG1 (BD Biosciences) and FITC-labeled Rat IgG2a isotype control antibodies (BD Biosciences) for 30 min at 4 °C in the dark. The cells were washed twice with Staining Buffer, then fixed and permeabilised with Cytofix/Cytoperm Fixation/Permeabilisation Solution Kit (BD Biosciences) following the manufacturer’s instructions. Subsequently, cells were incubated for 30 min at 4 °C in the dark with the following monoclonal antibodies: IFN-γ-PE (BD Biosciences), IL-4-PE (BD Biosciences) and PE-labeled Rat IgG1 isotype control antibody (BD Biosciences). Finally, cells were washed twice with 1 × Perm/Wash buffer (BD Biosciences) and resuspended in Staining Buffer prior to flow cytometry analysis.

Statistics

Differences between groups were analysed by one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) using GraphPad Prism version 5.01 for Windows. Significance was considered when P values ≤ 0.05 or 0.01.

Results

Production and characterisation of recombinant Tat-TPI and TPI proteins

After PCR amplification, we obtained the gene fragment of T-TPI (about 807 bp long), slightly longer than the TPI fragment. The recombinant plasmids were constructed successfully, and the recombinant proteins were purified to obtain fusion protein. By SDS-PAGE electrophoresis, the protein bands appeared at about 46 kDa. The fusion proteins of T-TPI and TPI were also recognised by His-Ab and S. japonicum infected-mice serum respectively in Western blotting (Fig. 1).
Fig. 1

Expression, purification and identification of the fusion proteins Tat-TPI and TPI. a. Purification of two fusion proteins detected by Protein Gel Electrophoresis. M: molecular weight marker, Lane 1: recombinant SjTat-TPI, Lane 2: recombinant SjTPI, Lane 3: the recombinant plasmid without purification. b. Fusion proteins recognised by His-Ab with Western blotting. Lane 1: recombinant SjTat-TPI, Lane 2: recombinant SjTPI. c. Fusion proteins recognised by S. japonicum infected-mice serum with Western blotting. Lane 1: recombinant SjTat-TPI, Lane 2: recombinant SjTPI

Immune response in the draining popliteal lymph nodes

To investigate the immune effect induced by Tat-TPI and TPI, we injected these two proteins to mice footpad respectively, and observed T-cell response in the draining popliteal lymph nodes. On day 4 post injection, Tat-TPI and TPI vaccination can both evoke host’s immune response. The results showed that Tat-TPI and TPI immunisation in foot pad of mice could induce higher levels Tc1 response in the draining popliteal lymph nodes compared to PBS controls (P < 0.01). More importantly, CD4+IFN-γ+ T-cell response could be quickly evoked by Tat-TPI instead of TPI. There was a significant difference in Tat-TPI- and TPI-vaccinated groups on CD4+IFN-γ+ T-cell percentages in the popliteal lymph nodes (P < 0.05) but not on CD8+IFN-γ+ T-cell percentages (Fig. 2a, and c).
Fig. 2

Immune responses in the draining popliteal lymph nodes of mice induced by Tat-TPI (T-TPI) and TPI proteins. a and c. Percentages of CD4+IFN-γ+ cells (Th1), CD8+IFN-γ+ cells (Tc1) analysed by FACS. b. The ratio of CD4+ T cells to CD8+ T cells (CD4/CD8) in the draining popliteal lymph nodes. Data are presented as the means ± SEM from six mice in each group. (*P < 0.05; **P < 0.01)

CD8+ T cells-blocking experiment

To ascertain if CD8+ T cells could help Th1 response, we used anti-mouse CD8a antibody to block CD8+ T cells. Flow cytometry showed Tat-TPI stimulated splenocytes produced higher CD3+CD4+IFN-γ+ cells than TPI stimulation. When CD8+ T cells were blocked (Fig. 3a), there was no significant influence on the percentages of CD4+IFN-γ+ T cells in splenocytes with TPI and PBS stimulation; however, T-TPI stimulated spleen cells expressed lower levels of CD4+ IFN-γ+ cells than those without CD8+ T-cell blockage (P < 0.05) (Fig. 3b, and c).
Fig. 3

Th1 immune response after CD8+T cells blockage in vitro. a. CD3+CD8+T cells were successfully blocked. The blocking efficiency was more than 99.6 %. b, c. Percentages of CD4+IFN-γ+ (Th1) in Tat-TPI (T-TPI), TPI stimulated splenocytes with or without CD8+T-cell blockage. Data are presented as the means ± SEM from four independent experiments. (*P < 0.05; **P < 0.01)

A high T-cell and antibody response induced by Tat-TPI before challenge

In the conventional vaccination-challenge experiment, three immunisations with antigen are usually adopted. To assess the impact of Tat-coupled TPI vaccination on the immune system in mice, we analysed the percentages of CD4+IFN-γ+(Th1), CD8+IFN-γ+(Tc1) T cells in the spleens by flow cytometry. Results showed that the percentages of CD4+IFN-γ+ and CD8+IFN-γ+ T cells from IFA-immunised mice were similar to those in PBS controls, while both of them were increased significantly in Tat-TPI-immunised and TPI-immunised mice (P < 0.01). Moreover, we found that CD4+IFN-γ+ T-cell percentages were even higher in Tat-TPI group compared to TPI group (P < 0.05) (Fig. 4a, and b). These findings suggested that Tat-TPI immunisation could elicit a higher level of Th1 and Tc1 response at the same time.
Fig. 4

T cell and antibodies responses after three immunisations with T-TPI + IFA, TPI + IFA, IFA and PBS. a and b: Percentages of CD3+CD4+IFN-γ+ (Th1) and CD3+CD8+IFN-γ+ (Tc1) gated from CD3+ cells analysed by FACS. c. IgG, IgG1 and IgG2a levels in mice sera were detected. Data are presented as the means ± SEM from eight mice in each group. (*P < 0.05; **P < 0.01)

Antibody responses including IgG, IgG1 and IgG2a antibody levels assayed by ELISA were also observed in addition to T-cell responses at two weeks after the third vaccination prior to challenge. High levels of IgG, IgG1 and IgG2a antibodies were detected in sera from mice vaccinated with Tat-TPI and TPI in comparison to IFA immunisation and PBS control (P < 0.01) (Fig. 4c). Both Tat-TPI and TPI immunisation elicited a strong IgG response in mice with little difference in IgG levels between them. However, there were apparent differences in IgG1 and IgG2a levels based on their OD values. Three immunisations with Tat-TPI produced more IgG1 than TPI immunisation (P < 0.05), while the opposite trend was seen in the IgG2a production (P < 0.01). The ratio of IgG2a/IgG1 in mice vaccinated with Tat-TPI and TPI were 0.63 and 1.59, respectively.

Immune protection associated with Tat-TPI and TPI vaccination

At six weeks after S. japonicum cercariae challenge, we calculated the numbers of adult worm recovered and eggs in the livers. Although the numbers of adult worms and eggs per gram (EPG) in the livers of mice vaccinated with TPI or Tat-TPI were slightly less than those in IFA immunisation and PBS control, there showed no significant differences among these four groups. Most importantly, these two antigens immunisation led to the smaller hepatic granuloma area with a single egg than IFA or PBS control groups with a significant difference. Especially, Tat-TPI-immunised mice showed the smallest granuloma area in the liver among the four groups (Fig. 5c, and d). The Th1 and Tc1 responses were detected by flow cytometry (Fig. 5e, and f). High levels of Th1 and Tc1 responses were detected in mice immunised with Tat-TPI and TPI in comparison to IFA immunisation and PBS control (P < 0.01). Results also showed that Th1 and Tc1 responses in mice immunised with TPI remained at high levels, which were still slightly lower than those of Tat-TPI-immunised mice, but there was no statistical significance in Tc1 reaction.
Fig. 5

Parasite burden and immune response were observed at 6 weeks after S. japonicum infection in mice vaccinated with T-TPI + IFA, TPI + IFA, IFA and PBS. a. Average number of worms recovered. b. Average number of eggs per gram (EPG) in the liver. c. Representative granulomas with a single egg from each group (100×). d. Average area of single egg granulomas from each group. e, f. Percentages of CD3+CD4+IFN-γ+(Th1) and CD3+CD8+IFN-γ+(Tc1) gated from CD3+ T cells analysed by FACS. Each bar represents the means ± SEM from twelve mice per group. (*P < 0.05; **P < 0.01)

Discussion

In this study, our initial conception was that the optimal cooperation among CD8+T cells, CD4+T cells and antibody responses would be required against schistosome infection. Thus, we adopted the protein transduction technology by using cell-permeable peptides to investigate the impact of different antigen-presented approaches on the host immune response and anti-infection protection.

The 11aa HIV-1 Tat was used to construct the fusion protein, Tat-TPI, in our study. HIV-Tat can activate CD8+T cells to produce high levels of IFN-γ. This concept is supported by some other results. Kronenberg et al. [19] reported that Tat-fusion proteins are superior in activating protective, CD8+T-cell response against Leishmania major when compared with antigen alone, and similar results were reported by Nicoli et al. [20] and Sforza et al. [21]. The increased CD8+T cells proliferation may be related to the improved expression of MHC-I complexes on the surface of DCs stimulated by Tat [22, 23]. Tat modulates the expression of T-box transcription factors T-bet [21] critical for stimulation of T-lymphocytes. In addition, it has been demonstrated that Tat could increase the secretion of IFN-α by macrophages [24] and IL-12 by DCs [25]. Our study showed that whether injected with Tat-TPI in foot pad or vaccinated with Tat-TPI in the back subcutaneously for three times, the draining lymph nodes and spleen both developed stronger CD8+T responses (Tc1) in the host.

It is the noteworthy finding that a higher Th1 level was observed in Tat-TPI vaccinated group in comparison to TPI immunisation. In order to better understand \whether the increased Th1 response was influenced by CD8+ T cells, we conducted anti-CD8a antibody-blocking assay in vitro. When CD8+T cells were blocked, Tat-TPI stimulated spleen cells expressed significantly lower levels of Th1 cells, indicating that CD8+T cells may assist CD4+T cells to produce more IFN-γ (Th1), which was in accordance with the study of Herath et al. [26]. CD8+T cells producing IFN-γ are important for regulating the CD4+T-cell response and Herath et al. [26] observed that the percentage of CD4+T cells producing IFN-γ was reduced with the depletion of CD8+T cells. In human leishmaniasis, da Silva Santos et al. [27] also found that CD8+T cells expressed activation markers at first and drove Th1 differentiation. On the other hand, CD8+T cells could also regulate IgG1 production [28]. We did realise that immunisation with Tat-TPI for three times was prone to produce IgG1 antibody subtype, while TPI vaccination was predominant to induce IgG2a production. In schistosome infection, IgG2a subclass is considered to be related to high protection [7, 29].

Generally, the studies of protective mechanisms against schistosomiasis are concentrated on CD4+T cells and antibody responses [6]. First, CD4+T-cell-produced IFN-γ is considered as the key factor [30, 31]. IFN-γ activates host macrophages to produce NO, which help eliminate parasites efficiently [10] . Secondly, the antibody response in attenuated vaccine-induced protection has been given much attention [9]. Yole et al. [32] reported that schistosome specific IgG antibody levels were positively correlated with the protection level against S. mansoni infection. However, the role of CD8+T cells played in schistosome infection, has been debated. In our study, we found that the increased CD8+T-cell response (Tc1) induced by Tat-TPI could not affect the development of adult worms, but helps to reduce significantly the hepatic granulomatous area with a single egg. Previous studies [33, 34] have shown that granulomatous reactions were gradually down-regulated due to the increase of CD8+T cells in the chronic phase of Schistosoma mansoni infection and the new granuloma formations were decreased significantly at 16–20 weeks after infection. When the spleen and lymph node cells of chronic phase were transferred to acute infection mice, newly formed granulomas in mice reduced significantly, and the inhibitory effect against granuloma response would disappear after depletion of CD8+T cells. Thus, in schistosome infection, CD8+T cells might regulate the immune pathological reaction via secreting some cytokines such as IFN-γ. Although high levels of Th1, Tc1 and IgG were induced by Tat-TPI immunisation, they did not achieve the ideal reduction rate of worm (11.9 %) and egg (12.4 %) burden in mice, being even lower than those in the TPI immunised group (21.9 % and 12.6 %, respectively). We have to admit that the protective mechanisms against schistosome infection are so complicated that we need to further explore the optimal vaccine strategy. Another possible cause is that mice model is not an ideal animal model to test vaccine efficacy, but is convenient to provide the relevant immunological observations.

In summary, this study suggests that immunisation with Tat-fused TPI may contribute to enhance CD4+ T-cell response and decrease hepatic egg granulomatous area after S. japonicum infection, but the anti-infection efficiency was limited. Thus, the optimal vaccine strategy is still the goal we are pursuing.

Conclusions

Tat-coupled TPI immunisation could activate CD8+T cells in mice, which assist CD4+T cells to produce more IFN-γ. Also, it could boost IgG production, especially IgG1 subclass. Although this vaccine strategy with Tat-TPI immunisation did not turn out to be effective in decreasing parasite burden, it did reduce the single egg granuloma area in the livers after Schistosoma japonicum infection.

Declarations

Acknowledgements

We thank Dr. Yang Dai from Jiangsu Institute of Parasitic Diseases for providing the plasmid, pcDNA3.1-SjTPI.opt, containing the optimised triosephosphate isomerase gene of S. japonicum. This work was supported by National Natural Science Foundation of China (NSFC) (Project No.81171593).

Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.

Authors’ Affiliations

(1)
Department of Pathogen Biology, Nanjing Medical University
(2)
Jiangsu Province Key Laboratory of Modern Pathogen Biology
(3)
Jiangsu Institute of Parasitic Diseases

References

  1. Pasma A, Schenk CV, Timman R, Busschbach JJ, van den Bemt BJ, Molenaar E, et al. Non-adherence to disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs is associated with higher disease activity in early arthritis patients in the first year of the disease. Arthritis Res Ther. 2015;17:281.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  2. Bian CR, Lu DB, Su J, Zhou X, Zhuge HX, Lamberton PH. Serological prevalence of Schistosoma japonicum in mobile populations in previously endemic but Now Non-endemic regions of china: a systematic review and meta-analysis. PLoS One. 2015;10(6):e0128896.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  3. Cioli D, Pica-Mattoccia L, Basso A, Guidi A. Schistosomiasis control: praziquantel forever? Mol Biochem Parasitol. 2014;195(1):23–9.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  4. Gong W, Huang F, Ma Y, Bai H, Yin L, Li J, et al. Protective immunity against Schistosoma japonicum infection can be provided by IgG antibodies towards periodate-sensitive or periodate-resistant glycans. Parasit Vectors. 2015;8:234.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  5. Li XH, Xu YX, Vance G, Wang Y, Lv LB, van Dam GJ, et al. Evidence that rhesus macaques self-cure from a Schistosoma japonicum infection by disrupting worm esophageal function: a New route to an effective vaccine? PLoS Negl Trop Dis. 2015;9(7):e0003925.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  6. Bickle QD. Radiation-attenuated schistosome vaccination--a brief historical perspective. Parasitology. 2009;136(12):1621–1632.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  7. Lin D, Tian F, Wu H, Gao Y, Wu J, Zhang D, et al. Multiple vaccinations with UV- attenuated cercariae in pig enhance protective immunity against Schistosoma japonicum infection as compared to single vaccination. Parasit Vectors. 2011;4:103.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  8. Tian F, Lin D, Wu J, Gao Y, Zhang D, Ji M, et al. Immune events associated with high level protection against Schistosoma japonicum infection in pigs immunized with UV-attenuated cercariae. PLoS One. 2010;5(10), e13408.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  9. Jankovic D, Wynn TA, Kullberg MC, Hieny S, Caspar P, James S, et al. Optimal vaccination against Schistosoma mansoni requires the induction of both B cell- and IFN-gamma-dependent effector mechanisms. J Immunol. 1999;162(1):345–51.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. Hewitson JP, Hamblin PA, Mountford AP. Immunity induced by the radiation-attenuated schistosome vaccine. Parasite Immunol. 2005;27(7–8):271–80.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  11. Pancre V, Gras-Masse H, Delanoye A, Herno J, Capron A, Auriault C. Induction of cytotoxic T-cell activity by the protective antigen of Schistosoma mansoni Sm28GST or its derived C-terminal lipopeptide. Scand J Immunol. 1996;44(5):485–92.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  12. Pancre V, Wolowczuk I, Guerret S, Copin MC, Delanoye A, Capron A, et al. Protective effect of rSm28GST-specific T cells in schistosomiasis: role of gamma interferon. Infect Immun. 1994;62(9):3723–30.PubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  13. Zhu Y, Si J, Harn DA, Yu C, Liang Y, Ren J, et al. The protective immunity of a DNA vaccine encoding Schistosoma japonicum Chinese strain triose-phosphate isomerase in infected BALB/C mice. Southeast Asian J Trop Med Public Health. 2004;35(3):518–22.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. Sun W, Liu S, Brindley PJ, McManus DP. Bacterial expression and characterization of functional recombinant triosephosphate isomerase from Schistosoma japonicum. Protein Expr Purif. 1999;17(3):410–3.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  15. Dai Y, Wang X, Zhao S, Tang J, Zhang L, Dai J, et al. Construction and evaluation of replication-defective recombinant optimized triosephosphate isomerase adenoviral vaccination in Schistosoma japonicum challenged mice. Vaccine. 2014;32(7):771–8.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  16. Ramsey JD, Flynn NH. Cell-penetrating peptides transport therapeutics into cells. Pharmacol Ther. 2015.Google Scholar
  17. Shibagaki N, Udey MC. Dendritic cells transduced with TAT protein transduction domain-containing tyrosinase-related protein 2 vaccinate against murine melanoma. Eur J Immunol. 2003;33(4):850–60.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  18. Zhu Y, Lu F, Dai Y, Wang X, Tang J, Zhao S, et al. Synergistic enhancement of immunogenicity and protection in mice against Schistosoma japonicum with codon optimization and electroporation delivery of SjTPI DNA vaccines. Vaccine. 2010;28(32):5347–55.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  19. Kronenberg K, Brosch S, Butsch F, Tada Y, Shibagaki N, Udey MC, et al. Vaccination with TAT-antigen fusion protein induces protective, CD8(+) T cell-mediated immunity against Leishmania major. J Invest Dermatol. 2010;130(11):2602–10.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  20. Nicoli F, Finessi V, Sicurella M, Rizzotto L, Gallerani E, Destro F, et al. The HIV-1 Tat protein induces the activation of CD8+ T cells and affects in vivo the magnitude and kinetics of antiviral responses. PLoS One. 2013;8(11):e77746.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  21. Sforza F, Nicoli F, Gallerani E, Finessi V, Reali E, Cafaro A, et al. HIV-1 Tat affects the programming and functionality of human CD8(+) T cells by modulating the expression of T-box transcription factors. Aids. 2014;28(12):1729–38.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  22. Gavioli R, Gallerani E, Fortini C, Fabris M, Bottoni A, Canella A, et al. HIV-1 tat protein modulates the generation of cytotoxic T cell epitopes by modifying proteasome composition and enzymatic activity. J Immunol. 2004;173(6):3838–43.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  23. Gavioli R, Cellini S, Castaldello A, Voltan R, Gallerani E, Gagliardoni F, et al. The Tat protein broadens T cell responses directed to the HIV-1 antigens Gag and Env: implications for the design of new vaccination strategies against AIDS. Vaccine. 2008;26(5):727–37.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  24. Zagury D, Lachgar A, Chams V, Fall LS, Bernard J, Zagury JF, et al. Interferon alpha and Tat involvement in the immunosuppression of uninfected T cells and C-C chemokine decline in AIDS. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1998;95(7):3851–6.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  25. Fanales-Belasio E, Moretti S, Fiorelli V, Tripiciano A, Pavone Cossut MR, Scoglio A, et al. HIV-1 Tat addresses dendritic cells to induce a predominant Th1-type adaptive immune response that appears prevalent in the asymptomatic stage of infection. J Immunol. 2009;182(5):2888–97.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  26. Herath S, Kropf P, Muller I. Cross-talk between CD8(+) and CD4(+) T cells in experimental cutaneous leishmaniasis: CD8(+) T cells are required for optimal IFN-gamma production by CD4(+) T cells. Parasite Immunol. 2003;25(11–12):559–67.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  27. da Silva Santos C, Brodskyn CI. The role of CD4 and CD8 T cells in human cutaneous leishmaniasis. Front Public Health. 2014;2:165.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  28. Zimmerer JM, Pham TA, Sanders VM, Bumgardner GL. CD8+ T cells negatively regulate IL-4-dependent, IgG1-dominant posttransplant alloantibody production. J Immunol. 2010;185(12):7285–92.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  29. Crawley A, Wilkie BN. Porcine Ig isotypes: function and molecular characteristics. Vaccine. 2003;21(21–22):2911–22.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  30. Mountford AP, Coulson PS, Pemberton RM, Smythies LE, Wilson RA. The generation of interferon-gamma-producing T lymphocytes in skin-draining lymph nodes, and their recruitment to the lungs, is associated with protective immunity to Schistosoma mansoni. Immunology. 1992;75(2):250–6.PubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  31. Wilson RA, Coulson PS, Mountford AP. Immune responses to the radiation-attenuated schistosome vaccine: what can we learn from knock-out mice? Immunol Lett. 1999;65(1–2):117–23.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  32. Yole DS, Reid GD, Wilson RA. Protection against Schistosoma mansoni and associated immune responses induced in the vervet monkey Cercopithecus aethiops by the irradiated cercaria vaccine. AmJTrop Med Hyg. 1996;54(3):265–70.Google Scholar
  33. Ragheb S, Boros DL. Characterization of granuloma T lymphocyte function from Schistosoma mansoni-infected mice. J Immunol. 1989;142(9):3239–46.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  34. Fidel Jr PL, Boros DL. Regulation of granulomatous inflammation in murine schistosomiasis. IV. Antigen-induced suppressor T cells down-regulate proliferation and IL-2 production. J Immunol. 1990;145(4):1257–64.PubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright

© Zhang et al. 2015

Comments

By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.

Advertisement