Open Access

A new allele conferring resistance to Lysinibacillus sphaericus is detected in low frequency in Culex quinquefasciatus field populations

  • Heverly Suzany Gouveia Menezes1,
  • Karlos Diogo de Melo Chalegre1,
  • Tatiany Patrícia Romão1,
  • Cláudia Maria Fontes Oliveira1,
  • Osvaldo Pompílio de-Melo-Neto2 and
  • Maria Helena Neves Lobo Silva-Filha1Email author
Parasites & Vectors20169:70

https://doi.org/10.1186/s13071-016-1347-2

Received: 21 July 2015

Accepted: 28 January 2016

Published: 4 February 2016

Abstract

Background

The Cqm1 α-glucosidase of Culex quinquefasciatus larvae acts as the midgut receptor for the binary toxin of the biolarvicide Lysinibacillus sphaericus. Mutations within the cqm1 gene can code for aberrant polypeptides that can no longer be properly expressed or bind to the toxin, leading to insect resistance. The cqm1 REC and cqm1 REC-2 alleles were identified in a laboratory selected colony and both displayed mutations that lead to equivalent phenotypes of refractoriness to L. sphaericus. cqm1 REC was first identified as the major resistance allele in this colony but it was subsequently replaced by cqm1 REC-2 , suggesting the better adaptive features of the second allele. The major aim of this study was to evaluate the occurrence of cqm1 REC-2 and track its origin in field populations where cqm1 REC was previously identified.

Methods

The screening of the cqm1 REC-2 allele was based on more than 2000 C. quinquefasciatus larvae from five localities in the city of Recife, Brazil and used a multiplex PCR assay that is also able to identify cqm1 REC . Full-length sequencing of the cqm1 REC-2 and selected cqm1 samples was performed to identify further polymorphisms between these alleles.

Results

The cqm1 REC-2 allele was found in field samples, specifically in two heterozygous individuals from a single locality with an overall frequency and distribution much lower than that observed for cqm1 REC . The full-length sequences from these two cqm1 REC-2 copies were almost identical to the cqm1 REC-2 derived from the resistant colony but displayed more than 30 SNPs when compared with cqm1 and cqm1 REC . The cqm1 REC and cqm1 REC-2 resistant alleles were found to be associated with two distinct sets of wild-type cqm1 variants found in field populations.

Conclusions

The cqm1 REC-2 allele occurs in populations in Recife and was probably already present in the samples used to establish the laboratory resistant colony. The data generated indicates that cqm1 REC-2 can be selected in field populations, although its low frequency and distribution in Recife suggest that cqm1 REC-2 presents a lower risk of selection compared to cqm1 REC .

Keywords

Resistance cqm1 alleles Binary toxin PCR-screening

Background

Lysinibacillus sphaericus based biolarvicides have been used worldwide for mosquito control and in particular against larvae from the Culex pipiens complex and Anopheles spp, owing to the high susceptibility of these species to the bacterium and the prolonged persistence of L. sphaericus in mosquito breeding sites in urban environments [13]. Endemic lymphatic filariasis is still found within the Recife Metropolitan Area (RMA) and its causative agent, Wuchereria bancrofti, is transmitted by Culex quinquefasciatus in some districts [4, 5]. Successful trials for controlling this species have been carried out in the RMA using L. sphaericus applications in combination with other environmental management actions [68]. These biolarvicides have been shown to perform very well in controlling C. quinquefasciatus but their use should be monitored because of the risk of resistance selection in treated populations. The major insecticidal factor produced by L. sphaericus is the Binary (Bin) protoxin, synthesized inside crystalline inclusions within the bacterium [9]. L. sphaericus acts through the ingestion of crystals by the mosquito larvae and subsequent release of Bin protoxins that are processed within the insect’s midgut. The toxin’s active form binds to a C. quinquefasciatus receptor that has been identified as a 66-kDa α-glucosidase, named Cqm1. The receptor is attached to the midgut epithelium by a glycosylphosphatidylinositol (GPI) anchor and is essential for Bin toxin action [10, 11]. This mode of action, depending on the binding of one toxin to a single class of receptors, can be disrupted by alterations in the target site that results in high resistance levels [12].

Resistance to L. sphaericus has been recorded in laboratory-selected colonies [13, 14] and in exposed field populations [1518] and the lack of the Cqm1 receptor on the midgut epithelium was the major cause for the failure of the Bin toxin to bind to the midgut [1922]. Investigation of the molecular basis of resistance has led to the identification of eight resistance alleles for the cqm1 gene, found in colonies or populations from different geographical origins in the USA, Brazil, France, and China [19, 2327]. Seven of these have deletions or nonsense mutations that create premature stop codons, resulting in transcripts coding for truncated proteins without a GPI anchor. Four of these alleles have been described in C. quinquefasciatus from Recife and two in particular, named cqm1 REC and cqm1 REC-2 , were co-selected in the R2362 laboratory colony [24, 27]. This colony was selected after continuous exposure to L. sphaericus and attained a high level of resistance, which was associated with the lack of midgut-bound Cqm1 receptors [13, 22]. A 19-nucleotide deletion (nt1257 to 1275) is responsible for the cqm1 REC resistance phenotype [27], while a single nucleotide transition (G1324A) was found to characterize the cqm1 REC-2 allele [24]. Both events create premature stop codons that prevent the expression of the midgut bound Cqm1 receptors. These alleles are recessively inherited and homozygous larvae for them are highly resistant to L. sphaericus, owing to the failure of Bin toxin to bind to the midgut epithelium [24].

The R2362 colony has been kept under laboratory conditions for more than 200 generations and cqm1 REC was originally described as the single allele associated with resistance in this colony. Subsequently, cqm1 REC-2 was identified as a second resistance allele co-selected along with cqm1 REC . Both alleles lead to a similar phenotype and they confer high resistance levels, although cqm1 REC was preferentially selected and displayed a significantly higher frequency in the long term (≈F1-F160). cqm1 REC was later replaced by cqm1 REC-2 , which became the most frequent allele, considering the genotypes for the cqm1 locus found among larvae from this colony. The significant increase in cqm1 REC-2 frequency in individuals from this colony seemed to be related to the amelioration of traits other than resistance, since they confer a similar phenotype, although this remains to be elucidated [24]. These alleles showed a singular evolution as this colony was maintained in a restricted environment without gene flow. The trajectory of the cqm1 REC-2 allele within the R2362 colony raised questions concerning its presence in field populations and thus to its potential to be selected. After identification of cqm1 REC within the R2362 resistant colony, this allele was recorded in populations from the RMA [28]. The main aim of this study was to investigate, through DNA screening, the occurrence and frequency of cqm1 REC-2 in C. quinquefasciatus in the RMA, in order to assess its importance for monitoring resistance to L. sphaericus in these areas. In addition, sequencing of cqm1 genes was performed to identify polymorphisms within the field samples analyzed in this study which might shed light on the relation between the distinct resistance alleles.

Methods

Mosquito colonies

The Culex quinquefasciatus and Aedes aegypti colonies used in this study were maintained in the insectarium of the Aggeu Magalhães Research Center (CPqAM)-FIOCRUZ under controlled conditions (26 ± 1 °C, 70 % humidity, and 12:12 h L:D photoperiod). The larvae were reared in tap water and fed with cat food; adults were fed on a 10 % sucrose solution; females were also fed on chicken blood. The following C. quinquefasciatus colonies were used: 1) CqSF, here called S, a susceptible reference colony established from egg rafts collected in Recife, Brazil; 2) REC and 3) REC-2 colonies, composed of larvae homozygous for cqm1 REC and cqm1 REC-2 alleles respectively that display high levels of resistance (≈100,000-fold) to L. sphaericus [24]; 4) Ae. aegypti RecLab reference colony, to obtain the genomic DNA used as a negative control for the PCR reactions.

Mosquito populations

Five populations from the Recife Metropolitan Area (RMA) were investigated. Samples from one L. sphaericus-treated area (Água Fria-AFR) and four non-treated areas (Azeitona-AZE, Ipojuca-IPO, Jaboatão-JAB, Roda de Fogo-RFO) were screened. Eggs or larvae were collected as described by Chalegre et al. [23] and were maintained under insectarium conditions until the 4th instar, when the larvae were harvested and stored at −70 °C until use.

Multiplex PCR for cqm1 allele detection

The DNA genomic samples used here included those available from a previous study using the same populations [23] in addition to DNA samples obtained from larvae of those populations kept at −70 °C that were subsequently extracted using DNAzol® (Invitrogen, Carlsbad, CA, USA). The present study used a multiplex PCR to amplify fragments and produce a profile of the possible genotypes for cqm1, cqm1 REC and cqm1 REC−2 alleles [24]. The conditions of PCR reactions and primer sequences used are described in Chalegre et al. [24]. All samples that showed the amplification of fragments whose size was compatible with that of the diagnostic fragment (172 bp) from cqm1 REC−2 allele were tested in a second PCR to confirm the amplification. These amplified fragments were then submitted to automatic sequencing in an ABI PRISM® 3100 Genetic Analyzer (Applied Biosystems) to confirm their identity.

Cloning and cqm1 sequencing

To identify the polymorphisms within the cqm1 sequence, genomic DNA was extracted and PCR reactions were carried out with primers flanking the cqm1 full length coding sequence using Platinum® TaqDNA Polymerase High Fidelity® (Invitrogen), as described [28]. The PCR fragments were cloned in pGEM®-T Easy (Promega) and submitted to automatic sequencing as described above. The alignment and assembly of the resulting nucleotide and amino acid sequences was achieved using the DNASTAR software package and manual refinement was carried out when necessary. The sequences obtained were compared to the cqm1 reference sequence available in GenBank (DQ333335) and to other sequences described in the Results section.

Results

A previous study assessing the frequency of cqm1 REC in field populations from the Recife Metropolitan Area (RMA) found this allele in all populations investigated [23, 28], confirming that it was already present in larvae samples used to establish the R2362 laboratory colony. This implies that the establishment of resistance did not require the selection of a novel spontaneous mutation arising within the colony. However, the lower frequency of cqm1 REC-2 during the earlier phases of the selection process may indicate a novel resistance event, which appeared only after the colony was established. To evaluate this possibility, the presence of this allele was investigated in C. quinquefasciatus populations from the RMA that had previously tested positive for the occurrence of cqm1 REC . The screening of cqm1 REC-2 was performed using a multiplex PCR [24] whose association of primers can amplify fragments and define the various genotypes identified so far, as shown (Fig. 1), that are homozygous for the cqm1, cqm1 REC and cqm1 REC-2 alleles (lanes 2, 3 and 4, respectively), and heterozygous for cqm1/cqm1 REC  and cqm1/cqm1 REC-2 (lanes 5 and 6, respectively). In this assay, a control fragment (376–357 bp) can be amplified from the cqm1 gene of all larvae, a diagnostic fragment (257–238 bp) is derived from the cqm1 and cqm1 REC alleles alone and a third fragment (172 bp) is exclusively amplified in the presence of cqm1 REC-2 , whose forward primer was designed to match the nonsense mutation G1324A. Fragments amplified from cqm1 and cqm1 REC can be distinguished because the cqm1 REC 19-nt deletion lies within this region and their corresponding products are slightly smaller. Fragments whose sizes were not compatible with those amplified from the cqm1 REC and cqm1 REC-2 alleles were considered derived from the wild type cqm1 gene.
Fig. 1

Fragments of Culex quinquefasciatus cqm1 alleles amplified from larvae of susceptible (S) and Lysinibacillus sphaericus-resistant colonies (REC, REC-2). Profile of fragments in base pairs (bp): S (ab, 376-257 bp), REC (a’b’, 357-238 bp) and REC-2 homozygous (ac, 376-172 bp); S/REC (aa’bb’) and S/REC-2 (abc) heterozygous; sample without DNA (C-). Molecular markers (M) in base pairs

DNA samples of individual larvae from four non-treated and one L. sphaericus treated field populations were analyzed to investigate the presence of the cqm1 REC-2 allele. Between 223 and 600 larvae per population were analyzed, comprising a total of 2,049 individuals. According to the diagnostic profile of the multiplex PCR, two heterozygous individuals carrying the cqm1 REC-2 allele were found in the non-treated area of Jaboatão (Fig. 2). The identity of the corresponding diagnostic PCR fragments was assessed through sequencing and the G1324A transition was found in both samples. This allele was not detected in any other sample evaluated in this study (Table 1). The frequency of cqm1 REC-2 in Jaboatão was 2 x 10−3 while this falls to 4.9 x 10−4 if all populations are considered, since it was found in samples from one among five populations that were analyzed in this study (Table 1). This new screening also detected the presence of the cqm1 REC allele, as expected, given the results of the previous screening carried out in these areas. In contrast to cqm1 REC-2 , cqm1 REC was detected in all populations sampled as heterozygous larvae and its frequencies ranged from 2 to 6 x 10−3 (Table 1).
Fig. 2

Fragments of Culex quinquefasciatus cqm1 alleles amplified from Jaboatão field samples. cqm1 homozygotes (S), cqm1/cqm1 REC-2 heterozygote (S/REC-2), cqm1 REC (C REC ) and cqm1 REC-2 (C REC-2 ) internal positive controls for the respective alleles, samples without DNA (C-). Molecular markers (M) in base pairs

Table 1

Genotypes for cqm1, cqm1 REC and cqm1 REC-2 alleles detected in Culex quinquefasciatus

  

Genotypesb

Frequency

Samplea

No.

cqm1/cqm1

cqm1/cqm1 REC

cqm1/cqm1 REC-2

cqm1 REC

cqm1 REC-2

AZE

223

221

2

0

0.004

0

IPO

500

498

2

0

0.002

0

JAB

500

495

3

2

0.003

0.002

RFO

226

224

2

0

0.004

0

AFR

600

593

7

0

0.006

0

Total

2049

2031

16

2

3.9 × 10−3

4.9 × 10−4

aLarvae population samples from districts of Recife city (Brazil)

bDetermined by multiplex PCR for the alleles analyzed

To establish the relation of cqm1 REC-2 alleles found in Jaboatão with other cqm1 alleles investigated in this study, wild type or mutants, full-length sequences were obtained and, after amplification and sequencing, their polymorphisms were compared (Additional file 1: Table S1). The two sequences from the cqm1 REC-2 alleles found in Jaboatão were identical except for a single nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) found at position 39. These sequences were then compared to the cqm1 REC-2 allele cloned from larvae of the REC-2 resistant colony that are homozygous for cqm1 REC-2 and only three additional SNPs distinguish the two Jaboatão alleles from the one found in the laboratory resistant colony (Additional file 1: Table S1). This identity level indicates that the cqm1 REC-2 allele selected in the laboratory colony derived from field samples used to establish that colony. By contrast, a comparison between the Jaboatão (J1) cqm1 REC-2 sequence and the cqm1 reference sequence (Gene Bank DQ 333335) identified 37 SNPs between the two sequences and nine of those led to changes in amino acids, showing significant differences between these alleles, which seem to be unrelated to the resistance-causing mutation. When the Jaboatão (J1) cqm1 REC-2 was compared with other sequences analyzed here, including cqm1 REC , a similar number of 35 to 37 SNPs between these sequences were observed (Fig. 3). To understand these sequence differences and evaluate the range of polymorphisms seen within the coding sequence for this protein, an independent survey was conducted of the full-length cqm1 gene sequences from another sample of fifteen C. quinquefasciatus larvae from Água Fria. The various cqm1 alleles sequenced can be broadly assigned to two categories, defined as “variants” 1 and 2, based on nucleotide changes which lead to substitutions in a group of amino acid residues (Table 2). Sequences of these representative “variants” were then compared with those included in the present study and the data shown highlight the fact that Jaboatão (field) and laboratory cqm1 REC-2 copies show the same polymorphisms and that these are distinct from those seen in cqm1 REC . When compared with the “variant” cqm1 alleles, this data indicates that cqm1 REC is derived from an allele linked to “variant 1” of cqm1 alleles, while cqm1 REC-2 is associated with “variant 2” (Table 2).
Fig. 3

Number of single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) between Jaboatão cqm1 REC-2 sequence (cqm1 REC-2 J1) versus other cqm1 sequences. cqm1 reference (Ref) (GeneBank DQ333335), cqm1 from Jaboatão (J), cqm1 REC and cqm1 REC-2 , from the respective REC and REC-2 laboratory resistant colonies

Table 2

Polymorphisms found in protein sequences coded by cqm1 alleles

 

Amino acid position

Alellea

3

8

15

26

27

141

178

246

335

336

430

439

450

466

529

530

541

556

Ref

Pro

Ser

Met

Asp

Ser

Ala

Thr

Ser

Ser

Ser

Thr

Ala

Pro

His

Asn

Ser

Gly

Thr

AFR1

Pro

Gly

Met

b

b

Ala

Thr

Ser

b

b

Thr

Thr

Pro

His

Lys

b

Gly

Met

AFR2

Thr

Ser

Thr

b

b

Val

Gln

Pro

b

b

Ser

Ala

Ser

Tyr

Asn

b

Ser

Thr

JAB

Pro

Ser

Thr

Val

Ser

Val

Gln

Pro

Asn

Ser

Thr

Ala

Pro

His

Asn

Ser

Gly

Thr

REC

Pro

Ser

Met

Asp

Ser

Ala

Thr

Ser

Ser

Ser

Thr

Ala

Pro

His

Asn

Ser

Gly

Thr

REC2

Thr

Ser

Thr

Asp

Leu

Val

Gln

Pro

Ser

Pro

Ser

Ala

Ser

Tyr

Asn

Pro

Ser

Thr

REC2 J1

Thr

Ser

Thr

Asp

Ser

Val

Gln

Pro

Ser

Ser

Ser

Ala

Ser

Tyr

Asn

Ser

Ser

Thr

REC2 J2

Pro

Ser

Thr

Asp

Ser

Val

Gln

Pro

Ser

Ser

Ser

Ala

Ser

Tyr

Asn

Ser

Ser

Thr

a Ref: cqm1 sequence (GeneBank DQ333335); AFR1/AFR2: cqm1 types 1 and 2 from Agua Fria; JAB: cqm1 from Jaboatão; REC and REC-2: cqm1 REC and cqm1 REC-2 from the respective laboratory resistant colonies; REC2 J1/REC2 J2: cqm1 REC-2 from two Jaboatão individuals

b Not determined

Discussion

The cqm1 REC-2 allele that confers high resistance to L. sphaericus, originally identified in the C. quinquefasciatus R2362 laboratory selected colony, was found also to occur in the field populations of Recife. cqm1 REC-2 was co-selected with the cqm1 REC allele in a colony that has been maintained under laboratory conditions for a period corresponding to more than 200 generations [24]. The earliest detection of cqm1 REC-2 in R2362 larvae was in F35, when it was found with a frequency of 0.21, contrasting with the frequency of 0.79 for cqm1 REC . From F182 onwards, however, cqm1 REC-2 replaced cqm1 REC as the most frequent allele conferring resistance in the colony, with an average frequency of 0.69. The detection of cqm1 REC-2 in a population suggests that it was present in field larvae samples used to establish the R2362 laboratory colony, rather than being derived from a mutation that occurred during the selection process [13]. Its detection in the field also demonstrates that its frequency can be tracked in populations exposed to treatments, unlike some resistance alleles that were identified in colonies but were not detected in field populations and whose risk of selection could not be directly assessed [29]. Its frequency therefore can and should be monitored in areas exposed to L. sphaericus treatment.

cqm1 REC-2 is the fourth cqm1 allele associated with resistance that was found to occur in C. quinquefasciatus populations from the RMA, along with cqm1 REC, cqm1 REC-16 and cqm1 REC-25 [23, 28]. cqm1 REC-2 showed a limited distribution, being detected in one out of the five populations surveyed, in contrast to cqm1 REC, which was found in all eight populations investigated to date [23, 28]. Likewise, the cqm1 REC-16 and cqm1 REC-25 alleles, identified in field populations only, also showed a limited distribution and frequency, when compared to cqm1 REC [23, 28]. Neither was cqm1 REC-2 found in an L. sphaericus-treated population whose conditions could be considered propitious for the detection of resistance alleles. The data obtained from the screening of these resistance cqm1 alleles concur with previous studies of resistance alleles to Bacillus thuringiensis (Bt) Cry toxins, which are present in populations that have not been previously exposed to control agents [3032]. This scenario of pre-adaptation was also found for chemical insecticides and one illustrative case was the detection of esterase genes conferring organophosphate resistance found in Lucilia cuprina specimens collected before the introduction of synthetic insecticides on a global scale [33]. A recent study of Helicoverpa spp populations from Australia showed genes conferring resistance to the vegetative insecticidal toxins (Vips) also produced by Bt, at frequencies between 0.008 and 0.027. These mutation rates were higher than expected, given that the samples were analyzed before the deployment of Vip-expressing plants that were intended to manage the resistance to Cry toxins expressed in Bt-plants [34]. The presence of the resistance cqm1 alleles in the non-treated populations also demonstrates their potential to respond to selection pressure. This set of studies has shown that a database of susceptibility to available insecticides and pre-existing mutations may be a valuable tool in guiding the choice of larvicides to be introduced in control programs and for monitoring the rise of resistance [35].

The sequence analysis of the cqm1 REC-2 alleles found in Jaboatão provided evidence that can be used to track the possible origin of this allele. The results generated corroborate the hypothesis that the cqm1 REC-2 selected in the R2362 colony derived from field population samples used to establish this colony. The analysis of single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) showed that field and laboratory copies of cqm1 REC-2 are almost identical, while these are clearly less related to cqm1 and cqm1 REC sequences. All SNPs observed in the cqm1 REC sequence, for instance, were found in the cqm1 reference sequence, which suggests a common origin, different from that observed for cqm1 REC-2 . Likewise, the polymorphism analysis at the protein sequence level revealed that the resistance alleles, cqm1 REC and cqm1 REC-2 , are derived from different cqm1 variants found in field populations. During the evolution of the R2362 colony, the cqm1 REC-2 allele showed the capacity to replace cqm1 REC after its initial co-selection and a lower frequency in this colony. This finding suggested that cqm1 REC-2 may be associated with fitness advantages and could potentially be better established in field populations and more easily selected if these are subjected to selection pressure through L. sphaericus treatments. The data from the present study show that the cqm1 REC-2 allele does occur in field populations, but its limited distribution and lower frequency, compared to cqm1 REC in the RMA, make its selection less likely.

Conclusions

The results of the present study therefore show the origin and occurrence of both resistance alleles in field populations of the RMA with a limited representation for cqm1 REC-2 in terms of frequency and distribution, compared to cqm1 REC . This scenario suggests selection to be less likely when resistance management strategies deployed in exposed mosquito populations are considered. These resistant alleles were found to be associated with two distinct wild-type cqm1 variants found in field populations, suggesting distinct origins. Multiple resistance cqm1 alleles were found to occur in the RMA and these may play distinct roles for selection. These factors should be taken into account when designing resistance management strategies.

Declarations

Acknowledgements

We thank Rosineide Arruda de Barros (CPqAM-FIOCRUZ) for insectarium support, and the Program for Technological Development in Tools for Health PDTIS-FIOCRUZ for the use of its facilities.

Funding

This work was supported by Conselho Nacional de Pesquisa (CNPq Brazil, grant 472491/2012-1) and Fundação Oswaldo Cruz-FIOCRUZ.

Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.

Authors’ Affiliations

(1)
Department of Entomology, Centro de Pesquisas Aggeu Magalhães-FIOCRUZ
(2)
Department of Microbiology, Centro de Pesquisas Aggeu Magalhães-FIOCRUZ

References

  1. Lacey L. Bacillus thuringiensis serovariety israelensis and Bacillus sphaericus for mosquito control. J Am Mosq Control Assoc. 2007;23:133–63.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. Regis L, Silva-Filha MH, Nielsen-LeRoux C, Charles JF. Bacteriological larvicides of dipteran disease vectors. Trends Parasitol. 2001;17:377–80.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. Schlein Y, Muller GC. Decrease of larval and subsequent adult Anopheles sergentii populations following feeding of adult mosquitoes from Bacillus sphaericus-containing attractive sugar baits. Parasit Vectors. 2015;8:244.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. Brandão E, Bonfim C, Cabral D, Lima JL, Aguiar-Santos AM, Maciel A, et al. Mapping of Wuchereria bancrofti infection in children and adolescents in an endemic area of Brazil. Acta Trop. 2011;120:151–4.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. Fontes G, Leite AB, de Lima AR, Freitas H, Ehrenberg JP, da Rocha EM. Lymphatic filariasis in Brazil: epidemiological situation and outlook for elimination. Parasit Vectors. 2012;5:272.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. Regis L, Oliveira CM, Silva-Filha MH, Silva SB, Maciel A, Furtado AF. Efficacy of Bacillus sphaericus in control of the filariasis vector Culex quinquefasciatus in an urban area of Olinda, Brazil. Trans R Soc Trop Med Hyg. 2000;94:488–92.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. Regis L, Silva-Filha MH, de Oliveira CM, Rios EM, da Silva SB, Furtado AF. Integrated control measures against Culex quinquefasciatus, the vector of filariasis in Recife. Mem Inst Oswaldo Cruz. 1995;90:115–9.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. Silva-Filha MH, Regis L, Oliveira CM, Furtado AE. Impact of a 26-month Bacillus sphaericus trial on the preimaginal density of Culex quinquefasciatus in an urban area of Recife, Brazil. J Am Mosq Control Assoc. 2001;17:45–50.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. Charles JF, Nielsen-LeRoux C, Delecluse A. Bacillus sphaericus toxins: molecular biology and mode of action. Annual review of entomology. 1996;41:451–72.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. Nielsen-Leroux C, Charles JF. Binding of Bacillus sphaericus binary toxin to a specific receptor on midgut brush-border membranes from mosquito larvae. Eur J Biochem. 1992;210:585–90.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. Silva-Filha MH, Nielsen-LeRoux C, Charles JF. Identification of the receptor for Bacillus sphaericus crystal toxin in the brush border membrane of the mosquito Culex pipiens (Diptera: Culicidae). Insect Biochem Mol Biol. 1999;29:711–21.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. Ferreira LM, Silva-Filha MHNL. Bacterial larvicides for vector control: mode of action of toxins and implications for resistance. Biocontrol Sci Technol. 2013;23:1137–68.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  13. Pei G, Oliveira CM, Yuan Z, Nielsen-LeRoux C, Silva-Filha MH, Yan J, et al. A strain of Bacillus sphaericus causes slower development of resistance in Culex quinquefasciatus. Appl Environ Microbiol. 2002;68:3003–9.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. Wirth MC, Georghiou GP, Malik JI, Abro GH. Laboratory selection for resistance to Bacillus sphaericus in Culex quinquefasciatus (Diptera: Culicidae) from California, USA. J Med Entomol. 2000;37:534–40.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. Mulla MS, Thavara U, Tawatsin A, Chomposri J, Su T. Emergence of resistance and resistance management in field populations of tropical Culex quinquefasciatus to the microbial control agent Bacillus sphaericus. J Am Mosq Control Assoc. 2003;19:39–46.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. Rao DR, Mani TR, Rajendran R, Joseph AS, Gajanana A, Reuben R. Development of a high level of resistance to Bacillus sphaericus in a field population of Culex quinquefasciatus from Kochi, India. J Am Mosq Control Assoc. 1995;11:1–5.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. Sinègre G, Babinot M, Vigo G, Jullien JL. First occurrence of Culex pipiens resistance to Bacillus sphaericus in Southern France. In: VIII European Meeting of Society of Vector Ecology 5–8 September 1994. Faculty of Biologia, University of Barcelona Spain. 1994.Google Scholar
  18. Yuan ZM, Zhang YM, Liu EY. High-level field resistance to Bacillus sphaericus C3-41 in Culex quinquefasciatus from Southern China. Biocontrol Sci Technol. 2000;10:43–51.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  19. Guo QY, Cai QX, Yan JP, Hu XM, Zheng DS, Yuan ZM. Single nucleotide deletion of cqm1 gene results in the development of resistance to Bacillus sphaericus in Culex quinquefasciatus. J Insect Physiol. 2013;59:967–73.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. Nielsen-Leroux C, Charles JF, Thiery I, Georghiou GP. Resistance in a laboratory population of Culex quinquefasciatus (Diptera: Culicidae) to Bacillus sphaericus binary toxin is due to a change in the receptor on midgut brush-border membranes. Eur J Biochem. 1995;228:206–10.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. Nielsen-Leroux C, Pasteur N, Pretre J, Charles JF, Sheikh HB, Chevillon C. High resistance to Bacillus sphaericus binary toxin in Culex pipiens (Diptera: Culicidae): the complex situation of West Mediterranean countries. J Med Entomol. 2002;39:729–35.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. Oliveira CMF, Silva-Filha MH, Nielsen-Leroux C, Pei G, Yuan Z, Regis L. Inheritance and mechanism of resistance to Bacillus sphaericus in Culex quinquefasciatus (Diptera: Culicidae) from China and Brazil. J Med Entomol. 2004;41:58–64.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. Chalegre KD, Romão TP, Tavares DA, Santos EM, Ferreira LM, Oliveira CMF, et al. Novel mutations associated to Bacillus sphaericus resistance are identified in a polymorphic region of the Culex quinquefasciatus cqm1 gene. Appl Environ Microbiol. 2012;78:6321–6.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. Chalegre KD, Tavares DA, Romao TP, Menezes HSG, Nascimento AL, Oliveira CMF, et al. Co-selection and replacement of resistance alleles to Lysinibacillus sphaericus in a Culex quinquefasciatus colony. The FEBS J. 2015;282:3592–602.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  25. Darboux I, Charles JF, Pauchet Y, Warot S, Pauron D. Transposon-mediated resistance to Bacillus sphaericus in a field-evolved population of Culex pipiens (Diptera: Culicidae). Cell Microbiol. 2007;9:2022–9.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  26. Darboux I, Pauchet Y, Castella C, Silva-Filha MH, Nielsen-LeRoux C, Charles JF, et al. Loss of the membrane anchor of the target receptor is a mechanism of bioinsecticide resistance. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2002;99:5830–5.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  27. Romão TP, de Melo Chalegre KD, Key S, Ayres CF, de Oliveira CM F, de-Melo-Neto OP, et al. A second independent resistance mechanism to Bacillus sphaericus binary toxin targets its alpha-glucosidase receptor in Culex quinquefasciatus. The FEBS J. 2006;273:1556–68.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  28. Chalegre KD, Romão TP, Amorim LB, Anastacio DB, de Barros RA, de Oliveira CM, et al. Detection of an allele conferring resistance to Bacillus sphaericus binary toxin in Culex quinquefasciatus populations by molecular screening. Appl Environ Microbiol. 2009;75:1044–9.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  29. Gahan LJ, Gould F, Lopez Jr JD, Micinski S, Heckel DG. A polymerase chain reaction screen of field populations of Heliothis virescens for a retrotransposon insertion conferring resistance to Bacillus thuringiensis toxin. J Econ Entomol. 2007;100:187–94.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  30. Genissel A, Augustin S, Courtin C, Pilate G, Lorme P, Bourguet D. Initial frequency of alleles conferring resistance to Bacillus thuringiensis poplar in a field population of Chrysomela tremulae. Proc Biol Sci. 2003;270:791–7.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  31. Gould F, Anderson A, Jones A, Sumerford D, Heckel DG, Lopez J, et al. Initial frequency of alleles for resistance to Bacillus thuringiensis toxins in field populations of Heliothis virescens. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 1997;94:3519–23.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  32. Tabashnik BE, Patin AL, Dennehy TJ, Liu YB, Carriere Y, Sims MA, et al. Frequency of resistance to Bacillus thuringiensis in field populations of pink bollworm. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2000;97:12980–4.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  33. Hartley CJ, Newcomb RD, Russell RJ, Yong CG, Stevens JR, Yeates DK, et al. Amplification of DNA from preserved specimens shows blowflies were preadapted for the rapid evolution of insecticide resistance. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2006;103:8757–62.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  34. Mahon RJ, Downes SJ, James B. Vip3A resistance alleles exist at high levels in Australian targets before release of cotton expressing this toxin. PLoS One. 2012;7, e39192.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  35. Pocquet N, Darriet F, Zumbo B, Milesi P, Thiria J, Bernard V, et al. Insecticide resistance in disease vectors from Mayotte: an opportunity for integrated vector management. Parasit Vectors. 2014;7:299.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright

© Menezes et al. 2016

Comments

By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.

Advertisement