Open Access

Sand flies (Diptera, Psychodidae, Phlebotominae), vectors of Leishmania protozoa, at an Atlantic Forest Conservation Unit in the municipality of Nísia Floresta, Rio Grande do Norte state, Brazil

  • Marcos Paulo Gomes Pinheiro1,
  • Marcel Miranda de Medeiros Silva1,
  • João Batista Silva Júnior1,
  • José Hilário Tavares da Silva1,
  • Maria de Lima Alves1 and
  • Maria de Fátima Freire de Melo Ximenes1Email author
Parasites & Vectors20169:83

https://doi.org/10.1186/s13071-016-1352-5

Received: 19 November 2015

Accepted: 29 January 2016

Published: 11 February 2016

Abstract

Background

Sand flies are insect vectors of protozoa from the genus Leishmania, causative parasites of visceral and American tegumentary leishmaniases. The present study discusses the bioecological aspects of sand fly species, transmitters of Leishmania protozoa, in different ecotopes of an Atlantic Forest Conservation Unit located in the metropolitan region of Natal, Rio Grande do Norte state, Brazil.

Methods

Two monthly captures were made in 1 year, using CDC light traps, in two anthropized and two preserved environments.

Results

A total of 2936 sand flies belonging to the following ten species were captured: Evandromyia walkeri, Evandromyia evandroi, Psychodopygus wellcomei, Sciopemyia sordellii, Psathyromyia brasiliensis, Lutzomyia longipalpis, Evandromyia lenti, Psathyromyia shannoni, Nyssomyia whitmani and Nyssomyia intermedia. The most common species was E. walkeri (77.6 %), followed by E. evandroi (17.5 %). Forest was the site with the greatest abundance (32.4 %), followed by bamboo grove (26.3 %).

Conclusions

Sand flies were generally more abundant in the rainy season and L. longipalpis, a vector species of Leishmania infantum, was adapted to anthropized environments. It was confirmed that P. wellcomei, a vector of Leishmania braziliensis in Amazônia, is a species associated with more preserved environments, and occurs only in the rainy season.

Keywords

Sand flies Lutzomyia Psychodopygus Nyssomyia Visceral leishmaniasis American tegumentary leishmaniasis Atlantic forest

Background

Sand flies are insects responsible for transmitting the causative parasites of American tegumentary (ATL) and visceral leishmaniases (VL), a serious health problem and among the major human diseases transmitted by insect vectors that can cause mutilation, incapacity and death [1, 2].

Although cutaneous and mucosal leishmaniasis are endemic to 18 countries in the Americas, with cases ranging from Mexico to Argentina, most cases are concentrated in Brazil and the Andean subregion [3].

VL is endemic to Latin America and most cases occur in Brazil, with risk factors also found in Argentina, Bolivia, Colombia, Costa Rica, El Salvador, Guatemala, Honduras, Mexico, Nicaragua and Venezuela [3].

In Brazil, the etiologic agent of VL is the protozoan Leishmania infantum and the vector is the sand fly Lutzomyia longipalpis [4]. ATL exhibits different causative agents and vectors, depending on the region of the country [512]. Among the sand flies considered vectors of ATL in Brazil, Nyssomyia whitmani, Nyssomyia intermedia, Nyssomyia umbratilis, Migonemyia migonei, Psychodopygus complexa and Psychodopygus wellcomei occur in the Northeast [6, 1215]. Effective measures to control the vectors are increasingly necessary.

Leishmaniasis transmission occurs in all regions of Brazil, with the largest number of VL cases recorded in the Northeast (53.6 % of confirmed cases), where the disease, formerly restricted to rural areas, has expanded to periurban and urban regions [4, 16]. In recent years, it has spread to urban areas throughout the country, and is continuously advancing in 21 states [17].

ATL occurs in all regions of Brazil, with outbreaks in the South, Southeast, Midwest, Northeast and North, primarily in the Amazon, where it is associated with colonization processes in areas deforested to construct roads, new urban centers and expand agricultural activities [18, 19].

In Rio Grande do Norte, cutaneous leishmaniasis is caused by Leishmania braziliensis [5] and occurs predominantly in the highland area of the state, primarily in municipalities at altitudes between 500 and 700 m. VL is more common in the Metropolitan region, where 37 % of the cases were recorded between 2007 and 2014, but can also be found in municipalities in the Western region of the state, which has reported a significant number of cases in recent years [5, 2022].

This study aimed to determine the composition of sand fly fauna in different ecotopes of an Atlantic Forest fragment, in order to broaden knowledge of the vector species, thereby contributing to epidemiological surveillance and control in the state.

Methods

Study area

The study was conducted in the National Forest (FLONA) of Nísia Floresta, an Atlantic Forest Conservation Unit located in the municipality of Nísia Floresta, Rio Grande do Norte state, Brazil. It is situated 30 km from the state capital, encompasses an area of 307,839 km2, with a population of 26,208 inhabitants in 2014, according to the Brazilian Institute of Geography and Statistics [23].

The Nísia Floresta FLONA is located in a region historically exploited for sugarcane monoculture. It is a conservation and research unit with 168.84 ha of different exotic and native Atlantic Forest plant cover [24].

Collections occurred at four specific points, denominated bamboo (1), trail (2), forest (3) and pinery (4), approximately 300 m apart (Fig. 1).
Fig. 1

Location of the municipality of Nísia Floresta and the Conservation Unit where collections took place

Bamboo (S06°05’13.9”/W035°11’09.1”) and trail (S06°05’09.2”/W035°11’06.5”), the closest points to the FLONA administration building, are more affected by anthropic activity.

The former (1) is significantly impacted and characterized by a number of bamboo plants (Poaceae: Bambusoideae) in a 900 m2 clearing containing litter and decomposing branches, in addition to discarded plant trimmings.

The latter (2) contains native trees such as Tabebuia sp. (ipê), Caesalphinia echinata (Brazilwood), Caesalpinia ferrea (Brazil ironwood), Bauhinia forficata (Brazilian orchard tree), among others, as well as exotic varieties such as Eucaliptus sp. (eucalyptus) and Pinus sp. (pine tree) [24] on a trail about 50 m from a soccer field located between the administration building and the forest.

The Atlantic Forest fragment (S06°04’57.7”/W035°10’58.7”) and the pinery (S06°04’50.2”/W035°10’57.8”) are the best preserved areas of the forest, with little anthropic activity.

The third area (3), denominated forest, consists of medium-sized and large native trees, between 10 and 25 m high, whose main species are Bowdichia vigilioides (sucupira), Lecythis pisonis (cream nut), Buchenavia sp. (mirindimba), Tapirira guianenis (cupiúba), Myrcia sp. (pau mulato), Coccoloba sp. (cauaçu), Tocoyena sp. (juruparana), Hymenaea sp. (jatobá), Cassia apoucovita, C. ferrea (pau ferro), Tabebuia sp. (ipê), C. echinata (Brazilwood), B. forficata (Brazilian orchard tree), among others. It is considered a fragment of the Semideciduous Seasonal Forest at an advanced stage of regeneration, covering around 80 ha, 45.22 % of FLONA’s total area [24].

The fourth area (4), the pinery, is located in the experimental area for Atlantic Forest regeneration, involving the planting of exotic pine trees (Pinus sp.) [24].

Sandfly captures and identification

Collections were carried out twice a month from May 2012 to April 2013, using a CDC (Center for Disease Control) light trap placed 1 m above the ground, activated at 5 pm and removed at 7 am the following morning.

The insects were sacrificed and screened in the Entomology Laboratory of Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Norte, at a temperature of −20 ° C.

The sand flies were then cleared in 10 % potassium hydroxide (KOH), mounted and observed under optical microscope for morphological identification, based on phylogenetic classification proposed by Galati [25, 26]. They were then cataloged and stored in the Professor Adalberto Antônio Varela-Freire Entomological Collection of Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Norte.

Statistical data analysis

Analysis to determine and compare diversity between environments was conducted using the Shannon-Wiener Diversity Index (H’) [27], calculated with Ecological Methodology 5.2 software [28].

The index of species abundance (ISA) and standardized index of species abundance (SISA) [29] were applied to analyze abundance data. The ISA values were determined and converted into SISA values between 0 and 1, using Microsoft Office Excel 2007.

The results were compared with rainfall, relative humidity and temperature data obtained from the National Meteorology Institute [30].

Results

A total of 2936 sand flies were collected from six genera belonging to the following ten species: Evandromyia walkeri, Evandromyia evandroi, P. wellcomei, Sciopemyia sordellii, Psathyromyia brasiliensis, L. longipalpis, Evandromyia lenti, Psathyromyia shannoni, N. whitmani and Nyssomyia intermedia (Table 1).
Table 1

Sand fly species collected in each ecotope, results of SISA and H’

Species

Ecotopes

Total

%

SISA

Ranking

Pinery

Forest

Trail

Bamboo

Evandromyia walkeri

456

779

473

589

2297

77.60 %

1.00

1

Evandromyia evandroi

138

118

80

159

495

17.50 %

0.87

2

Psychodopygus wellcomei

11

32

8

3

54

1.90 %

0.82

3

Sciopemyia sordellii

4

13

6

3

26

0.86 %

0.81

4

Lutzomyia longipalpis

1

3

6

9

19

0.64 %

0.80

5

Evandromyia lenti

2

3

4

1

10

0.34 %

0.79

6

Psathyromyia brasiliensis

10

6

6

0

22

0.73 %

0.56

7

Psathyromyia shannoni

0

1

1

7

9

0.30 %

0.54

8

Nyssomyia whitmani

0

3

0

0

3

0.10 %

0.04

9

Nyssomyia intermedia

0

1

0

0

1

0.03 %

0.04

10

Total

622

959

584

771

2936

100 %

-

-

%

21.5 %

32.4 %

19.8 %

26.3 %

100 %

-

-

-

H’

1.097

1.008

0.993

0.978

-

-

-

-

The environment containing the largest number of sand flies collected was the forest, accounting for 32.4 % of the specimens, followed by bamboo and pinery, with 26.3 % and 21.5 % respectively, and trail with 19.8 % (Table 1).

E. walkeri was the most abundant in each ecotope, corresponding to 77.6 % of all sand flies collected (SISA = 1.0), followed by E. evandroi with 17.5 % (SISA = 0.87) (Fig. 2). The least abundant species were N. whitmani (SISA = 0.04) and N. intermedia (SISA = 0.04) (Table 1).
Fig. 2

Standardized index of total species abundance (SISA), in anthropized (bamboo and trail) and forest environments (forest and pinery)

The collection site with the greatest diversity, according to the Shannon Diversity Index (H’), was the pinery (H’ = 1.097), followed by forest (H’ = 1.008) (Table 1).

P. wellcomei was the most abundant at points of less anthropic activity, while L. longipalpis was the most common in areas of significant human intervention (Table 1) (Fig. 3).
Fig. 3

Occurrence of L. longipalpis and P. wellcomei in anthropized (bamboo and trail) and forest environments (forest and pinery)

The largest number of sand flies were collected in May 2012 (33.7 % of the captures), and the lowest in April 2013, with only five specimens, four E. evandroi and one E. walkeri (Table 2).
Table 2

Sand fly species collected monthly at the Conservation Unit

Species

Month

Total

May

Jun

Jul

Aug

Sep

Oct

Nov

Dec

Jan

Feb

Mar

Apr

Evandromyia walkeri

863

156

299

86

80

90

142

68

92

300

120

1

2297

Evandromyia evandroi

87

29

63

19

36

32

34

35

40

80

36

4

495

Psychodopygus wellcomei

25

5

9

9

2

0

0

0

0

3

1

0

54

Sciopemyia sordellii

10

0

4

2

3

4

1

0

0

1

1

0

26

Psathyromyia brasiliensis

8

0

5

5

4

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

22

Lutzomyia longipalpis

7

2

1

0

6

0

1

0

0

2

0

0

19

Evandromyia lenti

5

0

0

1

0

1

0

2

1

0

0

0

10

Psathyromyia shannoni

1

0

1

7

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

9

Nyssomyia whitmani

0

0

2

0

1

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

3

Nyssomyia intermedia

1

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

1

Total

1007

192

384

129

132

127

178

105

133

386

158

5

2936

In all collection months, the species with the highest density were E. walkeri and E. evandroi (Table 2). P. wellcomei was the third most collected species in May, June, July, August and February (Table 2), months when considerable rainfall occurs (Fig. 4). There was a tendency for a larger number of sand flies of most species in the rainy months (Table 2).
Fig. 4

Annual distribution of P. wellcomei and L. longipalpis at the Conservation Unit and climatic variables (relative humidity, rainfall and mean temperature)

Discussion

The most abundant species collected were E. walkeri and E. evandroi, as yet not identified as vectors of Leishmania. However, the presence of vectors such as L. longipalpis, N. whitmani, N. intermedia and P. wellcomei is noteworthy.

Among sand fly vectors, there is an association between L. longipalpis, transmitter of L. infantum and modified environments, since most specimens were collected in this area. This is corroborated by numerous studies reporting the occurrence of these species in modified environments, evidencing their anthropophilic behavior [4, 31, 32].

N. whitmani and N. intermedia, species confirmed as vectors of L. braziliensis in forest environments in the Northeast [7, 13], and P. wellcomei, a vector species in Amazônia [3335], have demonstrated a preference for more preserved areas of the Conservation Unit. P. wellcomei and N. whitmani are predominantly forest dwellers in the study areas, given that most of the captures of both species occurred in such environments. However, it is important to underscore the easy adaptation of N. whitmani to anthropized environments [36].

The study area exhibited a difference between the habitats of vector species of causative agents of ATL and L. longipalpis, transmitter of L. infantum, likely due to phytogeographic and biological factors. This difference was also suggested in studies conducted by other authors in Bahia state, where L. longipalpis occurs in areas of the Caatinga or in those with anthropic activity, whereas N. whitmani and N. intermedia are found in tropical forests [32, 37, 38]. This shows that some regions exhibit a likely association between ATL-transmitting species and forest environments, whereas L. longipalpis, a VL transmitter, is associated with Caatinga environments or degraded areas with anthropic activity.

The fact that L. longipalpis is more common in anthropized environments confirms the anthropophilic behavior of the species and is undoubtedly related to cases of human VL in the metropolitan region of Natal. A total of 799 cases of VL were diagnosed in Rio Grande do Norte state between 2007 and 2014, 297 in the metropolitan region [21]. Thus, the greater frquency of L. longipalpis in anthropized environments confirms the invasive potential of this species, as well as its success as a vector in urban areas.

P. wellcomei, the third most abundant species in this study, was initially found in the Brazilian Amazon [39] and later in the Northeast, in forests in Ceará state [33], forest and peridomiciliary environments in Maranhão state [13, 40], and in forest environments of metropolitan regions in the states of Pernambuco [35] and Rio Grande do Norte [15].

Although studies on P. wellcomei in Northeastern Brazil are not sufficient to consider it as a vector in the region [3335], the occurrence of this species is extremely relevant, since it is a confirmed vector of L. braziliensis in Amazônia [39, 41] and exerts intense anthropofilia even in the daytime [42]. The endemic area of cutaneous leishmaniasis in Rio Grande do Norte is in the highland region of the state, the occurrence of this species in the metropolitan region, with greater abundance during some months of the year, reinforces the need for surveillance, given that residents, workers and researchers are in or near the forest on a daily basis.

In this study, P. wellcomei was associated with rainy months, corroborating the pattern described for the Amazon [8]. This leads us to suspect the possibility of diapause during the dry season, as reported in studies carried out in the Amazon [43]. Diapause seems to be a strategy adopted by sand flies to survive during adverse or extreme conditions [44].

Even though the study area is not endemic for ATL, it is important to register the occurrence of a small number of N. whitmani. This anthropophilic species is a vector of L. braziliensis in a number of areas in Brazil [9, 10, 45], including the Northeast [7], and its importance as a vector depends on its adaptation to the features of local ecotopes [46].

It is important to underscore the urban expansion at the edge of the Conservation Unit, where there has been an increase in residential condominiums. This interference may lead to the adaptation of vectors to new environments and alternative food sources, and at certain moments favor transmission cycles of the protozoan, as observed after colonization or deforestation [4750].

The presence of predominantly forest-dwelling sand flies reported in this study indicates a certain persistence in survival, and consequent transmission potential, despite the growing environmental degradation that has occurred surrounding the study area. It is important to highlight the increasing adaptation of vector species to environments modified by man [51], which may contribute to maintaining the vector potential of these species.

Even though E. walkeri and E. evandroi are dominant in areas of the Conservation Unit with significant anthropic activity (bamboo and trail), the concomitant presence of P. wellcomei, a species more adapted to forest environments, and L. longipalpis, an urbanized species, is relevant. In this respect, the possibility of sand flies’ seeking food in inhabited areas is important, as suggested in another study carried out in the metropolitan region of Natal, where these vectors may have adapted to feeding on exotic plants, whose monosaccharides coincided with those detected in plants such as Eucalyptus sp. (eucalyptus) and Pennisetum pupureum (elephant grass) [52].

P. shannoni was captured at three points: bamboo, trail and forest. In the United States, this species is considered a vector of Vesiculovirus, the cause of vesicular stomatitis [53], and a number of studies indicate that L. infantum develops well in this sand fly [54]. It is also hypothesized that the presence of infected dogs in occurrence areas of P. shannoni could give rise to epidemic cycles [55].

Given that expansion and urbanization of leishmaniases results from interactions between hosts and the protozoan parasite, as well as environmental degradation, studies aimed at analyzing the bioecology of vector species and their potential to adapt to new environments are sources of information that may contribute to the epidemiological surveillance of leishmaniases.

Conclusions

The rainiest period coincided with the highest occurrence of sand flies, and the greatest abundance and diversity was recorded in a preserved forest area.

There was a difference in species composition between the most anthropized and preserved areas.

It was confirmed that P. wellcomei is a species adapted to the rainiest period of the year and to forest environments, especially preserved areas. However, this species has been able to adapt to degraded environments, since in this study it also appears in environments with greater anthropic activity.

L. longipalpis seemed more adapted to areas with anthropic intervention; however, it can also be found in preserved environments.

Abbreviations

ATL: 

American tegumentary leishmaniasis

CDC: 

center for diseases control

FLONA: 

national forest

VL: 

visceral leishmaniasis

Declarations

Acknowledgments

To the Chico Mendes Biodiversity Conservation Unit (ICMBio), and the management and employees at the National Forest of Nísia Floresta for their authorization and support.

To the Coordination for the Improvement of Higher Education Personnel (CAPES) and the National Council for Scientific and Technological Development (CNPq) for financial support.

Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.

Authors’ Affiliations

(1)
Laboratório de Entomologia, Centro de Biociências, Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Norte

References

  1. Desjeux P. Leishmaniasis: current situation and new perspectives. Comp Immunol Microbiol Infect Dis. 2004;27:305–18.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. Rohousova I, Ozensoy S. Detection of species-specific antibody response of humans and mice bitten by sand flies. Parasitology. 2005;130:493–9.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. Organização Pan-Americana da Saúde (PAHO). Informe Leishmanioses N° 3 - Julho de 2015. http://www.paho.org/hq/index.php?option=com_topics&view=article&id=29&Itemid=40754. Accessed 08 Jan 2016.
  4. Lainson R, Rangel EF. Lutzomyia longipalpis and the eco-epidemiology of American visceral leishmaniasis, with particular reference to Brazil - a review. Mem Inst Oswaldo Cruz. 2005;100:811–27.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. Oliveira CC, Lacerda HG, Martins DR, Barbosa JD, Monteiro GR, Queiroz JW, et al. Changing epidemiology of American cutaneous leishmaniasis (ACL) in Brazil: a disease of the urban-rural interface. Acta Trop. 2004;90:155–62.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. Azevedo ACR, Rangel EF, Queiroz RG. L. migonei (França, 1920) naturally infected with peripylarian flagellates in Baturité, a focus of cutaneous leishmaniasis in Ceará State, Brazil. Mem Inst Oswaldo Cruz. 1990;85:479.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. Queiroz RG, Vasconcelos IA, Vasconcelos AW, Pessoa FA, Sousa RN, David JR. Cutaneous leishmaniasis in Ceará State in Northeastern Brazil: incrimination of Lutzomyia whitmani (Diptera: Psychodidae) as vector of Leishmania braziliensis in Baturité municipality. Am J Trop Med Hyg. 1994;50:693–8.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. Lainson R, Shaw JJ. New World Leishmaniasis. The neotropical Leishmania species. In: Collier L, Ballows A, Sussman M, editors. Topley & Wilson’s microbiology and microbial infectious diseases. 9th ed. London: Arnold; 1998. p. 241–66.Google Scholar
  9. Teodoro U, Alberton D, Kühl JB, Santos ES, Santos DR, Santos AR, et al. Ecologia de Lutzomyia (Nyssomyia) whitmani em área urbana do município de Maringá, Paraná. Rev Saude Publica. 2003;37:651–6.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. Alessi CAC, Galati EAB, Alves JR, Corbett CEP. American cutaneous leishmaniasis in the Pontal of Paranapanema - SP, Brazil: ecological and entomological aspects. Rev Inst Med Trop Sao Paulo. 2009;51:277–82.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. Diniz MMCSL, Ovallos FG, Gomes CMC, Lavitschka CO, Galati EAB. Host-biting rate and susceptibility of some suspected vectors to Leishmania braziliensis. Parasit Vectors. 2014. doi:https://doi.org/10.1186/1756-3305-7-139.PubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. Freitas MTS, Ríos-Velasquez CM, Costa-Junior CRL, Figueiredo-Junior CAS, Aragão NC, Silva LG, et al. Phenotypic and genotypic variations among three allopatric populations of Lutzomyia umbratilis, main vector of Leishmania guyanensis. Parasit Vectors. 2015. doi:https://doi.org/10.1186/s13071-015-1051-7.Google Scholar
  13. Rebêlo JMM, Araújo JAC, Carvalho ML, Barros VLL, Silva FS, Oliveira ST. Flebótomos (Diptera:Phlebotominae) da Ilha de São Luis, Zona do Golfão Maranhense, Brasil. Rev Soc Bras Med Trop. 1999;32:247–53.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. Balbino VQ, Andrade MS, Coutinho-Abreu I, Sonoda IV, Marcondes CB, Shaw JJ, et al. Sand flies (Diptera: Psychodidae) in Pernambuco State, northeastern Brazil: The presence of species incriminated as vectors of cutaneous leishmaniasis in the Amazon region. Zootaxa. 2005;1078:25–32.Google Scholar
  15. Pinheiro MPG, Silva JHT, Silva VPM, Andrade MJM, Ximenes MFFM. Lutzomya wellcomei Fraiha, Shaw & Lainson (Diptera, Psychodidae, Phlebotominae) em Fragmento de Mata Atlântica do Rio Grande do Norte, Nordeste do Brasil. EntomoBrasilis. 2013;6:232–8.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  16. Ximenes MFFM, Pinheiro MPG, Cavalcante KB, Silva VPM, Pontes NN, Queiroz PV, et al. Urbanization of visceral leishmaniasis in Rio Grande do Norte, Brazil: biotic and abiotic interactions. Rev Soc Bras Med Trop. 2009;42:138–40.Google Scholar
  17. Casos confirmados de Leishmaniose Visceral, Brasil, Grandes Regiões e Unidades Federadas.  Ministério da Saúde. Secretaria de Vigilância em Saúde, Brasil; 2015. http://portalsaude.saude.gov.br/images/pdf/2014/setembro/09/LV-Casos.pdf. Accessed 7 Feb 2016.
  18. Marzochi MCA. Leishmanioses no Brasil: as leishmanioses tegumentares. J Bras Med. 1992;63:82–104.Google Scholar
  19. Vale ECS, Furtado T. Leishmaniose tegumentar no Brasil: revisão histórica da origem, expansão e etiologia. An Bras Dermatol. 2005;80:421–8.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  20. Ximenes MFFM, Silva VPM, Queiroz PVS, Rego MM, Cortez AM, Batista LMM, et al. Flebotomíneos (Diptera: Psychodidae) e Leishmanioses no Rio Grande do Norte, Nordeste do Brasil - Reflexos do Ambiente Antrópico. Neotrop Entomol. 2007;36:128–37.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  21. Secretaria de Estado da Saúde Pública do Rio Grande do Norte (SESAP), Sistema de Informação de Agravos de Notificação (SINAN). Leishmaniose tegumentar e Leishmaniose Visceral por Município de Residência no Estado do Rio Grande do Norte, Brasil: 2007–2014; 2015. http://sinan.saude.gov.br/sinan. Accessed 7 Feb 2016.
  22. Leite AI, Araújo LB. Leishmaniose visceral: aspectos epidemiológicos relacionados aos óbitos em Mossoró-RN. Rev Patol Trop. 2013;42:301–8.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  23. Estimativa da População 2014, Nísia Floresta, Rio Grande do Norte, Brasil. Instituto Brasileiro de Geografia e Estatística (IBGE). 2015. http://www.cidades.ibge.gov.br/xtras/perfil.php?lang=&codmun=2408201. Accessed 15 Jul 2015.
  24. Plano de Manejo da Floresta Nacional de Nísia Floresta (Volume I). Ministério do Meio Ambiente, Brasília, Brasil. 2015. http://www.icmbio.gov.br/portal/images/stories/imgs-unidades-coservacao/Volume_I___Diagn%C3%B3stico_02ago12.pdf. Accessed 05 Aug 2015.
  25. Galati EAB. Classificação de Phlebotominae. In: Rangel EF, Lainson R, editors. Flebotomíneos do Brasil. Rio de Janeiro: Editora Fiocruz; 2003. p. 23–51.Google Scholar
  26. Galati EAB. Morfologia e Taxonomia: Morfologia, terminologia de adultos e identificação dos táxons da América. In: Rangel EF, Lainson R, editors. Flebotomíneos do Brasil. Rio de Janeiro: Editora Fiocruz; 2003. p. 53–175.Google Scholar
  27. Magurran AE. Ecological diversity and its measurement. London: Cambridge University Press; 1988. p. 179.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  28. Kenney AJ, Krebs CJ. Programs for Ecological Methodology. 2nd ed. Vancouver: University of British Columbia; 2000.Google Scholar
  29. Roberts DR, Hsi BP. An index of species abundance for use with mosquito surveillance data. Environ Entomol. 1979;8:1007–13.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  30. Instituto Nacional de Meteorologia (INMET). Banco de Dados Meteorológicos para Ensino e Pesquisa. 2015. http://www.inmet.gov.br/portal/index.php?r=bdmep/bdmep. Accessed 12 Jun 2015.
  31. Ximenes MFFM, Castellon EG, Souza MF, Freitas RA, Pearson RD, Wilson ME, et al. Distribuition of phlebotomine sandflies (Diptera: Psychodidae) in the state of Rio Grande do Norte, Brazil. J Med Entomol. 2000;37:162–9.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  32. Dias-Lima AG, Guedes MLS, Sherlock IA. Horizontal Stratification of the Sand Fly Fauna (Diptera: Psychodidae) in a Transitional Vegetation between Caatinga and Tropical Rain Forest, State of Bahia, Brazil. Mem Inst Oswaldo Cruz. 2003;98:733–7.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  33. Ready PD, Ribeiro AL, Lainson R, Alencar JE, Shaw JJ. Presence of Psychodopygus wellcomei (Diptera: Psychodidae), a proven vector of Leishmania braziliensis, in Ceará State. Mem Inst Oswaldo Cruz. 1983;78:235–6.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  34. Brandão-Filho SP, Brito MEF, Martins CAP, Sommer IB, Valença HF, Almeida FA, et al. Leishmaniose tegumentar americana em centro de treinamento militar localizado na Zona da Mata de Pernambuco, Brasil. Rev Soc Bras Med Trop. 1998;31:575–8.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  35. Silva DF, Vasconcelos SD. Flebotomíneos em fragmentos de Mata Atlântica na Região Metropolitana do Recife, PE. Rev Soc Bras Med Trop. 2005;38:264–6.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  36. Brandao-Filho SP, Donalisio MR, Silva FJ, Valenca HF, Costa PL, Shaw JJ, et al. Spatial and temporal patterns of occurrence of Lutzomyia sand fly species in an endemic area for cutaneous leishmaniasis in the Atlantic Forest region of Northeast Brazil. J Vector Ecol. 2011;36 Suppl 1:71–6.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  37. Vexenat JA, Barreto AC, Cuba CAC, Marsden PD. Características epidemiológicas da leishmaniose tegumentar americana em uma região endêmica do estado da Bahia. III. Fauna flebotomínica. Mem Inst Oswaldo Cruz. 1986;81:293–301.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  38. Azevedo ACR, Vilela ML, Souza NA, Coelho CAA, Barbosa AF, Firmo ALS, et al. The sand fly fauna (Diptera: Psychodidae: Phlebotominae) of a focus cutaneous of leishmaniases in Ilheus, state of Bahia, Brazil. Mem Inst Oswaldo Cruz. 1996;91:75–9.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  39. Lainson R, Shaw JJ, Ward RD, Fraiha H. Leishmaniasis in Brazil: IX Considerations on the Leishmania braziliensis complex: Importance of the genus Psychodopygus Mangabeira in the transmission of L. braziliensis brasiliensis in north Brazil. Trans R Soc Trop Med Hyg. 1973;67:184–96.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  40. Pereira-Filho AA, Bandeira MCA, Fonteles RS, Moraes JLP, Lopes CRG, Melo MN, et al. An ecological study of sand flies (Diptera: Psychodidae) in the vicinity of Lençóis Maranhenses National Park, Maranhão, Brazil. Parasit Vectors. 2015. doi:https://doi.org/10.1186/s13071-015-1045-5.PubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  41. Ryan L, Lainson R, Shaw JJ. Leishmaniasis in Brazil. XXIV. Natural flagellate infections of sandflies (Diptera: Psychodidae) in Pará State, with particular reference to the role of Psychodopygus wellcomei as the vector of Leishmania braziliensis in the Serra do Carajás. Trans R Soc Trop Med Hyg. 1987;81:353–9.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  42. Fraiha H, Shaw JJ, Phlebotominae LR, Brasileiros II. Psychodopygus wellcomei, nova espécie antropófila de flebótomo do grupo squamiventris, do sul do estado do Pará, Brasil (Diptera: Psychodidae). Mem Inst Oswaldo Cruz. 1971;69:489–500.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  43. Ryan L, Lainson R, Shaw JJ, Fraiha-Neto H. Ecologia de flebotomíneos (Diptera, Psychodidae, Phlebotominae) na Região Amazônica, vol. 1. Belém: Instituto Evandro Chagas “50 anos”; 1987. p. 307–20.Google Scholar
  44. Lawyer PG, Young DG. Diapause and quiescence in the neotropical sand fly Lutzomyia diabolica (Hall). Parassitologia. 1992;33:353–60.Google Scholar
  45. Costa SM, Cechinel M, Bandeira V, Zannuncio JC, Lainson R, Rangel EF. Lutzomyia (Nyssomyia) whitmani s.l. (Antunes & Coutinho, 1939) (Diptera: Psychodidae: Phlebotominae): geographical distribution and the epidemiology of American cutaneous leishmaniasis in Brazil – mini-review. Mem Inst Oswaldo Cruz. 2007;102:149–53.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  46. Rebêlo JMM, Rocha RV, Moraes JLP, Alves GA, Leonardo FS. Distribuição de Lutzomyia whitmani em fitorregiões do estado do Maranhão, Brasil. Rev Saude Publica. 2009;43(6):1070–4.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  47. Costa JML, Saldanha ACR, Mello-Silva AC, Serra-Neto A, Galvão CES, Pedroso-Silva CM, et al. Estado atual da leishmaniose cutânea difusa (LCD) no Estado do Maranhão. II. Aspectos epidemiológicos, clínicos e evolutivos. Rev Soc Bras Med Trop. 1992;25:115–23.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  48. Rebêlo JMM, Leonardo FS, Costa JML, Pereira YNO, Silva FS. Flebotomíneos (Diptera, Psychodidae) de área endêmica de leishmaniose na região dos cerrados, Estado do Maranhão, Brasil. Cad Saude Publica. 1999;15:623–30.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  49. Rebêlo JMM, Oliveira ST, Barros VLL, Silva FS, Costa JML, Ferreira LA, et al. Phlebotominae (Diptera:Psychodidae) de Lagoas, município de Buriticupu, Amazônia Maranhense. I – Riqueza e abundancia relativa das espécies em área de colonização recente. Rev Soc Bras Med Trop. 2000;33:11–9.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  50. Bern C, Maguire JH, Alvar J. Complexities of Assessing Disease Burden Attributable to Leishmaniasis. Negl Trop Dis. 2008;313:1–8.Google Scholar
  51. Lainson R, Shaw JJ, Ready PD, Miles MA, Póvoa M. Leishmaniasis in Brazil: XVI. Isolation and identification of Leishmania species from sandflies, wild mammals and man in north Para State, with particular reference to Leishmania braziliensis guayanensis, causative agent of “pian-bois”. Trans R Soc Trop Med Hyg. 1981;75:530–6.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  52. Pinheiro MPG, Silva JHT, Cavalcanti KB, Azevedo PRM, Ximenes MFFM. Ecological interactions among phlebotomines (Diptera: Psychodidae) in an Agroforestry environment of northeast Brazil. J Vector Ecol. 2013;38:307–16.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  53. Corn JL, Comer JA, Erickson GA, Nettles VF. Isolation of vesicular stomatitis virus New Jersey serotype from phlebotomine sand flies in Georgia. Am J Trop Med Hyg. 1990;42:476–82.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  54. Ferro C, Cardenas E, Corredor D, Morales A, Munstermann LE. Life cycle and fecundity analysis of Lutzomyia shannoni (Dyar) (Diptera: Psychodidae). Mem Inst Oswaldo Cruz. 1998;93:195–9.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  55. Travi BL, Ferro C, Cadena H, Montoya-Lerma J, Adler GH. Canine visceral leishmaniasis: dog infectivity to sand flies from non-endemic areas. Res Vet Sci. 2002;72:83–6.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright

© Pinheiro et al. 2016

Comments

By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.

Advertisement