Skip to content

Advertisement

Parasites & Vectors

Research
Open Access

Bayesian risk profiling of soil-transmitted helminth infections and estimates of preventive chemotherapy for school-aged children in Côte d'Ivoire

  • Richard B. Yapi†1, 2, 3, 4,
  • Frédérique Chammartin†3, 4,
  • Eveline Hürlimann2, 3, 4,
  • Clarisse A. Houngbedji2, 3, 4, 5,
  • Prisca B. N’Dri2, 3, 4,
  • Kigbafori D. Silué1, 2,
  • Jürg Utzinger3, 4,
  • Eliézer K. N’Goran1, 2,
  • Penelope Vounatsou3, 4 and
  • Giovanna Raso3, 4Email author
†Contributed equally
Parasites & Vectors20169:162

https://doi.org/10.1186/s13071-016-1446-0

©  Yapi et al. 2016

Received: 13 November 2015

Accepted: 11 March 2016

Published: 21 March 2016

Abstract

Background

Soil-transmitted helminthiasis affects more than a billion people in the world and accounts for a global burden of 5.1 million disability-adjusted life years. The objectives of this study were (i) to map and predict the risk of soil-transmitted helminth infections among school-aged children in Côte d’Ivoire; (ii) to estimate school-aged children population-adjusted risk; and (iii) to estimate annual needs for preventive chemotherapy.

Methods

In late 2011/early 2012, a cross-sectional survey was carried out among school-aged children in 92 localities of Côte d’Ivoire. Children provided a single stool sample that was subjected to duplicate Kato-Katz thick smears for the diagnosis of soil-transmitted helminths. A Bayesian geostatistical variable selection approach was employed to identify environmental and socioeconomic risk factors for soil-transmitted helminth infections. Bayesian kriging was used to predict soil-transmitted helminth infections on a grid of 1 × 1 km spatial resolution. The number of school-aged children infected with soil-transmitted helminths and the amount of doses needed for preventive chemotherapy according to World Health Organization guidelines were estimated.

Results

Parasitological data were available from 5246 children aged 5–16 years. Helminth infections with hookworm were predominant (17.2 %). Ascaris lumbricoides and Trichuris trichiura were rarely found; overall prevalences were 1.9 % and 1.2 %, respectively. Bayesian geostatistical variable selection identified rural setting for hookworm, soil acidity and soil moisture for A. lumbricoides, and rainfall coefficient of variation for T. trichiura as main predictors of infection. The estimated school-aged children population-adjusted risk of soil-transmitted helminth infection in Côte d’Ivoire is 15.5 % (95 % confidence interval: 14.2–17.0 %). We estimate that approximately 1.3 million doses of albendazole or mebendazole are required for school-based preventive chemotherapy, and we provide school-aged children-adjusted risk aggregated at health district level.

Conclusion

We provide the first soil-transmitted helminthiasis risk profile for entire Côte d’Ivoire, based on a robust Bayesian geostatistical framework. Our model-based estimates of treatment needs and risk maps on health district level may guide the national control program in spatial targeting of annual interventions.

Keywords

Bayesian modellingCôte d’IvoireHookwormRisk profilingSchool-aged childrenSoil-transmitted helminthiasis

Background

More than one billion people were estimated to be infected with soil-transmitted helminths (i.e. Ascaris lumbricoides, hookworm and Trichuris trichiura) in 2010 [1]. The majority of soil-transmitted helminth infections occur in Asia, sub-Saharan Africa and Latin America. Indeed, more than 90 % of the global burden due to soil-transmitted helminthiasis, which account for 5.1 million disability-adjusted life years (DALYs), are concentrated in this part of the world [2]. Infections primarily occur in remote rural and deprived urban settings among poorest communities in tropical and sub-tropical countries. Inappropriate hygiene practices, lack of access to clean water, improved sanitation, and health facilities are the main risk factors associated to the persistence of these infections [3–7]. Preventive chemotherapy with a strong focus on school-aged children is one of the main pillars of the global strategy against soil-transmitted helminthiasis [8]. However, this strategy alone does not prevent people from reinfection unless clean water, improved sanitation and adequate hygiene behaviour are available, used and practiced [9, 10].

Approaches, combining geographical information systems (GIS), remote sensing and Bayesian geostatistics, have been developed and applied in the last decade to model and predict the risk of helminth infections at high spatial resolution [11–14]. These efforts and resulting risk maps facilitate spatial targeting of control efforts in the context of resources scarcity [15]. Côte d’Ivoire is endemic to multiple helminth infections [16–19]. A particularly rich vein of investigation have been conducted in the mountainous western part of the country, including spatially explicit risk profiling [20–22]. In the Man area, elevation and land cover were identified as important predictors explaining the geographic variation of hookworm infections [11]. Yet, there is a paucity of studies investigating risk factors that explain the spatial distribution of soil-transmitted helminths at a national scale.

We present findings from a geostatistical analysis of soil-transmitted helminth infection data that were obtained from the first national school-based survey in Côte d’Ivoire. The aims of this study were (i) to map and predict the spatial distribution of soil-transmitted helminth infections in the school-aged population within a Bayesian geostatistical framework; (ii) to estimate school-aged children population-adjusted risk; and (iii) to calculate annual need for preventive chemotherapy according to guidelines put forward by the World Health Organization (WHO).

Methods

Ethics, consent and permissions

Ethical clearance was obtained from the ethics committees of Basel (EKBB, reference no. 30/11) and Côte d’Ivoire (reference no. 09-2011/MSHP/CNER-P). In addition, permission for the study and for the school survey was obtained from the Ministry of National Education. Heads of the health districts, education authorities, school directors and teachers of the selected schools were informed about the purpose and procedures of the study. Written informed consent was obtained from the parents/guardians of children, whereas children from consenting parents/guardians additionally assented orally. Children could withdraw from the study at any time without further obligation. Parasitological and questionnaire data were coded and treated confidentially. All study participants, regardless of soil-transmitted helminth infection status, were given a single dose of albendazole (400 mg single dose). Additionally, those children found with Schistosoma mansoni infection received praziquantel (40 mg/kg).

Study design and population

Details of the study area and population surveyed have been described elsewhere [23]. In brief, the study was carried out during the dry season, from November 2011 to February 2012, and enrolled children from 93 schools in Côte d’Ivoire. We designed a cross-sectional survey using a lattice plus close pairs design [24]. From each school, at least 60 children were selected to participate, which exceeds the minimum sample size recommended by WHO, for collection of baseline information on helminth prevalence and intensity in the school-aged population within large-scale surveys [25].

Field and laboratory procedures

The field and laboratory procedures have been detailed previously [23]. To summarise, children were invited to provide a sample of their fresh morning stool put in a 120 ml plastic container that was distributed in advance. A unique identification number was assigned to each child. Stool samples were transferred to health laboratories and processed the same day. Duplicate Kato-Katz thick smears were prepared from each stool, using standard 41.7 mg plastic templates [26, 27]. After a clearing time of 30–45 min, the thick smears were examined under a light microscope by experienced laboratory technicians. The number of helminth eggs was enumerated and recorded for each species separately. Ten percent of the Kato-Katz thick smears were randomly selected for quality control and re-examined by a senior microscopist [28]. Infection was defined as the presence of at least one helminth egg on one of the two Kato-Katz thick smears examined for each child.

Environmental and socioeconomic predictors

Various environmental and socioeconomic proxies, known to favour helminthiasis risk, were considered as potential explanatory variables for building predictive geostatistical risk models for the three major soil-transmitted helminth infections analysed in this study. A summary description of these variables is presented in Table 1. In brief, we considered 11 environmental proxies; namely, day and night mean land surface temperatures (LST day and LST night), mean difference of LST between day and night (LST diff), land cover, normalized difference vegetation index (NDVI), yearly rainfall estimates and their coefficient of variation (rainfall CV), altitude, soil acidity (pH), soil moisture and a variable accounting for the ecological zone. Moreover, we included variables that accounted for rural/urban setting, the human influence index (HII), the percentage of households with improved sanitation and households with improved access to drinking water.
Table 1

Data sources and properties of environmental and socioeconomic variables explored to model the soil-transmitted helminth infection risk in Côte d’Ivoire

Data type

Source

Temporal resolution

Temporal coverage

Spatial resolution

Environmental

    

 Day land surface temperature (LST)

MODIS/Terraa

8 days

2011

1 km

 Night land surface temperature (LST)

MODIS/Terraa

8 days

2011

1 km

 LST difference

Derived from LST

8 days

2011

1 km

 

(day LST - night LST)

   

 Land cover

MODIS/Terraa

Yearly

2011

1 km

 Normalized difference vegetation index

MODIS/Terraa

16 days

2011

1 km

 Rainfall

ADDSb

10 days

2011

8 km

 Rainfall coefficient of variation (CV)

Derived from rainfall

10 days

2011

1 km

 

(standard deviation/mean)

   

 Altitude

DEMc

  

1 km

 Soil acidity (pH)

WISE3d

  

10 km

 Soil moisture

WISE3d

  

10 km

 Ecological zone

ISODATAe

 

2000-2008

1 km

Socioeconomic

    

 Urban/rural

GRUMPf

 

1995

1 km

 Human influence index (HII)

LTWg

 

2005

1 km

 Improved sanitation/drinking water

Bayesian kriging of DHSh, MICSi, and WHSj sanitation data with urban/rural as covariate

 

1994-2011

1 km

aModerate Resolution Imaging Spectroradiometer (MODIS). Available at: https://lpdaac.usgs.gov/ (accessed: 1 March 2015)

bAfrica Data Dissemination Service (ADDS). Available at: http://earlywarning.usgs.gov/adds/ (accessed: 1 March 2015)

c Digital elevation model (DEM). Available at: http://eros.usgs.gov/ (accessed: 1 March 2015)

dISRIC-WISE database (WISE3). Available at: http://www.isric.org/ (accessed: 1 March 2015)

eCalculated with the Iterative Self-Organizing Data Analysis Technique [41]

fGlobal Rural–urban Mapping Project version 1 (GRUMPv1): Urban Extents Grid. Center for International Earth Science Information Network (CIESIN), International Food Policy Research Institute (IFPRI), The World Bank and Centro Internacional de Agricultura Tropical (CIAT). Available at: http://sedac.ciesin.columbia.edu/data/collection/grump-v1 (accessed: 1 March 2015)

gLast of the Wild Project version 2, 2005 (LWP-2): Global Human Influence Index (HII) dataset (geographic)

Wildlife Conservation Society International Earth (WCS) and Center for International Earth Science Information Network (CIESIN). Available at: http://sedac.ciesin.columbia.edu/data/set/wildareas-v2-human-influence-index-geographic (accessed: 1 March 2015)

hDemographic and Health Surveys. Available at: http://www.measuredhs.com (accessed: 1 March 2015)

iMultiple Indicator Cluster Surveys. Available at: http://www.childinfo.org/mics.html (accessed: 1 March 2015)

jWorld Health Surveys. Available at: http://www.who.int/healthinfo/survey/en/index.html (accessed: 1 March 2015)

Statistical analysis

We modelled soil-transmitted helminth infection risks within a standard Bayesian geostatistical framework and used Markov chain Monte Carlo (MCMC) simulations algorithms to estimate model parameters [29]. In short, the prevalence of each infection at a given location is modelled on the logit scale as a linear function of rigorously chosen explanatory variables and a Gaussian spatial process that accounts for residual spatial correlation not otherwise captured by the covariates. The spatial structure of this latent process is introduced through a variance-covariance matrix defined as an exponential function of the distances between pairs of survey locations.

The choice of explanatory variables that define the final model was carried out with a Bayesian geostatistical variable selection approach as preliminary analysis. Such a procedure allows to explore all possible models, while accounting for spatial correlation in the data based on variable posterior probability [30]. In brief, we performed a stochastic search variable selection [31] within a geostatistical framework that explores the inclusion of a predictor in the model by multiplying each regression coefficient by a binary indicator variable that indicates the presence or absence of the predictor in the model. In order to allow a rigorous selection of predictors that are categorised, we considered “normal mixture of inverse Gamma distributions with parameter expansion” priors [32] for the regression coefficients. Continuous potential predictors were either standardised or categorised. Non-spatial univariate associations were investigated and the best functional form was chosen according to the best goodness of fit measured by the Akaike information criterion (AIC).

Prediction of the risk was carried out via Bayesian kriging [33] for more than 350,000 pixels representing a fine grid laid over Côte d’Ivoire (at 1 × 1 km spatial resolution). Our final models were validated by assessing the predictive ability, including predictive uncertainty. Each model was fitted on a random sample representing 80 % of the full dataset (72 locations) and model-based predictions of the remaining 20 % of the dataset (20 locations) were compared with observed prevalences. Thus, the mean error (ME) was calculated to assess the predictive ability, while the sum of the standard deviation (SD) of the predictive distributions measured the predictive uncertainty. The goodness of fit measure was given by the deviance information criterion (DIC) [34]. Further details on model specification and implementation of variable selection and model fit are provided in the additional information (see Additional file 1).

Estimated needs for preventive chemotherapy

WHO recommends treatment of all school-aged children twice a year in high-risk communities (prevalence of any soil-transmitted helminth ≥ 50 %), and once every year in moderate-risk communities (prevalence of any soil-transmitted helminth infection between 20 and 50 %) [35]. To estimate the number of deworming tablets required for preventive chemotherapy on a yearly basis, we defined the soil-transmitted helminth risk level of each health district according to the school-aged children population-adjusted risk. To determine school-aged children population-adjusted risks, we first calculated the estimated soil-transmitted helminth prevalence for sample of the predictive distribution using a simple probabilistic model of combined infection divided by a factor of 1.06. In details, as the prevalences of the three species of soil-transmitted helminth are reported separately here, and given that they can occur simultaneously within a community, the number of preventive chemotherapy maybe somehow overestimated. To correct this overestimation, we applied the method described by de Silva and Hall in 2010 to accurately estimate the amount of treatments needed [36]. Then, we estimated the number of infected school-aged children with any soil-transmitted helminth infection at each prediction pixel by multiplying the predicted risk by the number of children aged 5–15 years sourced from the Afripop database (available upon request at: www.afripop.org). Finally, we obtained school-aged children adjusted risk by summing up the predicted number of infected children over the health districts, divided by the total population.

Results

In the 93 selected schools, we invited 5491 children to provide a fresh morning stool sample for the diagnosis of soil-transmitted helminth infection. Overall, 5246 children (95.5 %) in 92 schools met our inclusion criteria. Reasons for exclusion were either absence of written parental informed consent (2.5 %) or recent deworming within two weeks prior to our survey, as reported by one school director (1.1 %) (Fig. 1). Enrolled children had an age between 5 and 16 years with a mean of 9.8 years.
Fig. 1

Flow chart showing the cross-sectional study compliance considered in the analysis. The study was carried out in 93 schools in Côte d’Ivoire, late 2011/early 2012

Microscopic examination of stool samples revealed eggs of soil-transmitted helminths among 1 000 children (19.1 %). Table 2 summarises soil-transmitted helminth species-specific prevalences. In short, hookworm infections were predominant with an overall prevalence of 17.2 %. A. lumbricoides and T. trichiura were rarely found; overall prevalences were 1.9 % and 1.2 %, respectively. Figure 2 shows the distribution of the observed prevalence of soil-transmitted helminth infections in Côte d’Ivoire.
Table 2

Soil-transmitted helminth species-specific prevalences found among school-aged children in Côte d’Ivoire, late 2011/early 2012

Soil-transmitted helminth

Children examined

Infected (%)

95 % CIa

Overall

5,246

1,000 (19.1)

18.0, 20.1

Hookworm

5,246

903 (17.2)

16.2, 18,2

A. lumbricoides

5,246

97 (1.9)

1.5, 2.2

T. trichiura

5,246

64 (1.2)

0.9, 1.5

a CI confidence interval

Fig. 2

Observed soil-transmitted helminth prevalence in Côte d’Ivoire, late 2011/early 2012. a, hookworm; b, A. lumbricoides; c, T. trichiura

Results of the Bayesian geostatistical variable selection are summarised in Table 3. For hookworm infections, the model with the highest posterior probability (8.9 %) selected rural/urban setting. Soil acidity and soil moisture were selected with a model posterior probability of 3.2 % to model A. lumbricoides infection risk. For T. trichiura infection, the model including rainfall CV was selected with a posterior probability of 0.4 %. Furthermore, the covariates selected also presented the highest posterior inclusion probability, in excess of 50 %. The corresponding selected covariates were chosen to build predictive risk models specific to each of the three soil-transmitted helminth species.
Table 3

Results of the geostatistical variable selection. Models selected with the highest model posterior probability are presented, together with posterior inclusion probability of each explored predictor

 

Selected model with predictor posterior inclusion probability

Predictor

Hookworm

A. lumbricoides

T. trichiura

Day land surface temperature (LST)a,b,c

Not selected (27.6 %)

Not selected (33.0 %)

Not selected (40.6 %)

Night land surface temperature (LST)b,c

Not selected (12.9 %)

Not selected (23.1 %)

Not selected (23.9 %)

LST difference

Not selected (10.6 %)

Not selected (22.2 %)

Not selected (24.7 %)

Land covera,b,c

Not selected (18.2 %)

Not selected (16.3 %)

Not selected (31.3 %)

Normalized difference vegetation indexc

Not selected (8.1 %)

Not selected (10.8 %)

Not selected (34.2 %)

Rainfallc

Not selected (14.4 %)

Not selected (12.3 %)

Not selected (19.6 %)

Rainfall coefficient of variation (CV)

Not selected (7.1 %)

Not selected (17.1 %)

Selected (71.8 %)

Altitudeb,c

Not selected (23.6 %)

Not selected (42.5 %)

Not selected (39.4 %)

Soil acidity (pH)b

Not selected (7.4 %)

Selected (59.0 %)

Not selected (37.2 %)

Soil moisturea,c

Not selected (17.7 %)

Selected (90.8 %)

Not selected (22.5 %)

Ecological zonea,b,c

Not selected (17.4 %)

Not selected (30.3 %)

Not selected (24.7 %)

Rural/urban settinga

Selected (84.3 %)

Not selected (26.2 %)

Not selected (44.6 %)

Human influence index (HII)b,c

Not selected (25.3 %)

Not selected (36.1 %)

Not selected (32.7 %)

Improved sanitation

Not selected (23.5 %)

Not selected (23.1 %)

Not selected (19.1 %)

Improved drinking water

Not selected (7.1 %)

Not selected (21.9 %)

Not selected (29.6 %)

Model posterior probability

8.9 %

3.2 %

0.4 %

aCategorised for hookworm; bCategorised for A. lumbricoides; cCategorised for T. trichiura

Model parameter estimates and validation measures of fitted models are provided in Table 4. Parameter estimates show that hookworm infections are favoured in rural settings, as reflected by the negative effect of the variable urban on the logit of hookworm risk (odds ratio (OR) = 0.3; 95 % Bayesian credible interval (BCI): 0.2–0.5). Residual spatial correlation was non negligible and estimated to be 217.6 km (95 % BCI: 94.4–585.1 km). Predicted infection risks for A. lumbricoides and T. trichiura were low throughout Côte d’Ivoire. However, for A. lumbricoides infection, we observed a positive effect of soil pH and a positive association of soil moisture on the infection risk. Hence, distribution of A. lumbricoides is favoured by moist soils that are too acid with a pH below 5.2, and showed a residual spatial correlation of 75.8 km (95 % BCI: 6.3–429.2 km). We also estimated a positive effect of rainfall CV on T. trichiura infection risk (OR = 2.0; 95 %, 95 % BCI: 1.3–3.2), with 20.5 km (95 % BCI: 5.9–80.5 km) as residual spatial correlation estimated. The higher the rainfall variation, the higher the T. trichiura infection risk.
Table 4

Parameter estimates and validation measures of Bayesian geostatistical models for hookworm, A. lumbricoides and T. trichiura infection risks in Côte d’Ivoire, late 2011/early 2012

Hookworm

OR (95 % BCI)

Setting

 

 Rural

1.0

 Urban

0.3 (0.2, 0.5)a

 

Median (95 % BCI)

Variance

1.1 (0.5, 6.3)

Spatial range (km)

217.6 (94.4, 585.1)

 

Model validation measuresb

Mean error (ME) (%)

0.3

Sum standard deviation (SD) (%)

2.2

A. lumbricoides

OR (95 % BCI)

Soil acidity (pH)

 

 < 5.2

1.0

 5.2–5.4

0.3 (0.1, 0.9)a

 ≥ 5.4

0.1 (0.0, 0.4)a

Soil moisture

2.4 (1.4, 4.0)a

 

Median (95 % BCI)

Variance

1.5 (0.6, 3.8)

Spatial range (km)

75.8 (6.3, 429.2)

 

Model validation measuresb

Mean error (ME) (%)

−2.1

Sum standard deviation (SD) (%)

1.0

T. trichiura

OR (95 % BCI)

Rainfall coefficient of variation (CV)

2.0 (1.3, 3.2)a

 

Median (95 % BCI)

Variance

2.3 (1.0, 5.0)

Spatial range (km)

20.5 (5.9, 80.5)

 

Model validation measuresb

Mean error (ME) (%)

−0.2

Sum standard deviation (SD) (%)

0.6

aSignificant based on 95 % BCI

bAssessed by fitting the model on a subsample of the data (80 %)

Figure 3a depicts the overall soil-transmitted helminthiasis predictive risk map for Côte d’Ivoire. Low risk areas (prevalence < 20 %) were mostly concentrated around urban settings. The map of the SD of the model prediction shows that low prediction errors were typically observed around survey locations (Fig. 3b). We estimated an overall soil-transmitted helminth infection children population-adjusted risk of 15.5 % (95 % BCI: 14.2–17.0 %) for Côte d’Ivoire. In particular, the children population-adjusted risks were estimated at 14.1 % (95 % BCI: 12.9–15.4 %) for hookworm infections, 1.5 % (95 % BCI: 1.0–2.5 %) for A. lumbricoides infections and 1.1 % (95 % BCI: 0.7–2.1 %) for T. trichiura infections, respectively.
Fig. 3

Maps showing the predicted risk (a) and standard deviation (SD) of the predictive risk (b) of soil-transmitted helminth infections in Côte d’Ivoire, late 2011/early 2012

Additionally, we provide the school-aged children population-adjusted risk aggregated at health district level as additional information (see Additional file 2). The highest soil-transmitted helminthiasis risk was estimated at 36.1 % for the health district of Nassian, in the north-eastern part of Côte d’Ivoire. A map depicting health districts classified as low (predicted children population-adjusted risk < 20 %) and moderate (predicted children population-adjusted risk between 20 and 50 %) is presented in Fig. 4. According to WHO guidelines that consist to treat once a year all school-aged children living in communities at moderate risk [8], we estimated that a preventive measure implemented at health district level would target 1,290,594 school-aged children. Therefore, the same amount of deworming tablets would be required.
Fig. 4

Estimated overall soil-transmitted helminthiasis risk at health district level. Risk is adjusted to the school-aged children population and stratified according to WHO thresholds for intervention planning

Discussion

This study presents soil-transmitted helminth infection prevalence data from the first national school-based survey in Côte d’Ivoire and provides model-based estimates of the infection risk at high spatial resolution. Our results show that, in Côte d’Ivoire, hookworm are the predominant soil-transmitted helminths with an estimated school-aged children population-adjusted infection risk of 14.1 %. Only very low prevalence rates were found for A. lumbricoides infection (1.5 %) and T. trichiura infection (1.1 %). The negative association of urbanisation with hookworm infection risk is consistent with previous studies that highlight that hookworm infections are particularly rampant in rural settings [14, 37].

The prevalence of soil-transmitted helminth infections estimated by our study were lower than expected, especially with regard to A. lumbricoides and T. trichiura [14]. So far, soil-transmitted helminthiasis risk analyses have been based on historical data at broad scale [37], or with data restricted to well-known endemic areas [11, 38], collected from various sources that employ different methods and techniques [14]. A comparison of issues related to the use of historical data vs the use of recent national survey data is provided in the additional information (see Additional files 3 and 4). Thus, our results highlight the importance of a rigorous sampling design, such as the lattice plus close pair design for geostatistical modelling employed in this study [24]. In addition, it should be noted that after the armed conflict ended by the post-electoral crisis [39], the official health programme to control schistosomiasis, soil-transmitted helminthiasis and lymphatic filariasis and non-governmental health organisations restarted and intensified their activities through preventive chemotherapy campaigns targeting school pupils. Furthermore, in the last decades, many places of sub-Saharan Africa are undergoing rapid urbanisation and this development may have a positive impact on the helminth burden thus significantly reducing helminth infection prevalences [40].

We estimated that 1.3 million school-aged children should be dewormed yearly within the frame of preventive chemotherapy programmes implemented at the district level. This corresponds roughly to a third of the number of treatments estimated by Karagiannis-Voules et al. [14]. Indeed, these authors estimated the number of treatments required for school-aged children to amount to 3.6 million. The prior models were based on historical data, which do not necessarily reflect the actual situation, in particular when recent data are sparse [41, 42].

The risk of soil-transmitted helminth infection was estimated below 20 % for most health districts. According to WHO guidelines, school-aged children living in areas with a prevalence lower than 20 %, treatment on case-by-case basis should be undertaken whereas large scale administration of anthelminthic drugs should be advocated in health districts with an estimated moderate risk between 20 and 50 %. Emphasis should also be placed on water, sanitation and hygiene promotion (WASH) to sustain all efforts put in place to control the transmission of soil-transmitted helminthiasis [5, 7, 43].

Our study has several limitations that are offered for consideration. First, we have used the Kato-Katz technique and examined duplicate thick smears from a single stool sample for the presence of eggs of soil-transmitted helminths. Although this technique is recommended by WHO [44], it lacks sensitivity, particularly in low intensity settings. Hence, repeated sampling is required to account for day-to-day variation of egg output [45]. Thus, in our study, light infections were likely missed and the prevalence of soil-transmitted helminths observed may have been underestimated, given that most infections were of light intensity [46]. Secondly, the present study was carried out during the dry season, which could lead to underestimate the prevalence of soil-transmitted helminth infections that occur in Côte d’Ivoire as demonstrated by the effect of rainfall CV on the spread of T. trichiura. Thirdly, although the survey covered the entire Côte d’Ivoire, only 92 locations were visited. Increasing the number of schools to be investigated may give a more accurate estimation of soil-transmitted helminth infection prevalence in Côte d’Ivoire.

Conclusion

To conclude, this study provides smooth maps of the soil-transmitted helminth infection risk among school-aged children in Côte d’Ivoire that reflect well the observed prevalence. In addition, we offer a comprehensive map for the soil-transmitted helminth risk at health district level that can assist health officers controlling the infection according to WHO recommendations. Given that WHO does not recommend large-scale administration of anthelminthic drugs in areas of low soil-transmitted helminth infection, it is essential that monitoring of soil-transmitted helminth infection is regularly done so that treatment strategies can be readily adapted. Finally, although mass drug administration remains the cornerstone to fight against these diseases, we advocate integrated approaches that in addition to preventive chemotherapy aim at improving access to water and sanitation and at changing hygiene behaviour through health education campaigns for the sustainable control and future elimination of these diseases. The latter interventions become even more important when prevalences are very low and individuals with infections need to be treated on a case-by-case basis.

Declarations

Acknowledgements

We are grateful to the local district education and health authorities for their assistance in conducting this study. We also thank all the schoolchildren for their enthusiastic participation. Many thanks are addressed to the laboratory technicians (Jean K. Brou, Amani Lingué Norbert, Mahamadou Traoré and Sadikou Touré) and drivers from CSRS (Toukou Guillaume, Akoubé Jean, Kaboré Paul Emile, Djahi Marius and Tanon Mangoh). This project received financial support from the Swiss National Science Foundation (project no. SNF 32003b_132949) and from the Programme d’Appui Stratégique à la Recherche Scientifique (project no. PASRES 47_2009).

Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.

Authors’ Affiliations

(1)
Unité de Formation et de Recherches Biosciences, Université Félix Houphouët-Boigny, Abidjan, Côte d’Ivoire
(2)
Département Mode de Vie, Maladies Tropicales et Emergentes, Centre Suisse de Recherches Scientifiques en Côte d’Ivoire, Abidjan, Côte d’Ivoire
(3)
Department of Epidemiology and Public Health, Swiss Tropical and Public Health Institute, Basel, Switzerland
(4)
University of Basel, Basel, Switzerland
(5)
Unité de Formation et de Recherche Sciences de la Nature, Université Nangui Abrogoua, Abidjan, Côte d’Ivoire

References

  1. Pullan RL, Smith J, Jasrasaria R, Brooker SJ. Global numbers of infection and disease burden of soil transmitted helminth infections in 2010. Parasit Vectors. 2014;7:37.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  2. Murray CJL, Vos T, Lozano R, Naghavi M, Flaxman AD, Michaud C, et al. Disability-adjusted life years (DALYs) for 291 diseases and injuries in 21 regions, 1990–2010: a systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2010. Lancet. 2012;380:2197–223.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. Acka CA, Raso G, N’Goran EK, Tschannen AB, Bogoch II, Séraphin E, et al. Parasitic worms: knowledge, attitudes, and practices in western Côte d’Ivoire with implications for integrated control. PLoS Negl Trop Dis. 2010;4:e910.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  4. Belizario Jr VY, Totañes FIG, de Leon WU, Lumampao YF, Ciro RNT. Soil-transmitted helminth and other intestinal parasitic infections among school children in indigenous people communities in Davao del Norte, Philippines. Acta Trop. 2011;120 Suppl 1:12–8.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  5. Ziegelbauer K, Speich B, Mäusezahl D, Bos R, Keiser J, Utzinger J. Effect of sanitation on soil-transmitted helminth infection: systematic review and meta-analysis. PLoS Med. 2012;9:e1001162.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  6. Schmidlin T, Hürlimann E, Silué KD, Yapi RB, Houngbedji CA, Kouadio BA, et al. Effects of hygiene and defecation behavior on helminths and intestinal protozoa infections in Taabo, Côte d’Ivoire. PLoS one. 2013;8:e65722.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  7. Strunz EC, Addiss DG, Stocks ME, Ogden S, Utzinger J, Freeman MC. Water, sanitation, hygiene, and soil-transmitted helminth infection: a systematic review and meta-analysis. PLoS Med. 2014;11:e1001620.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  8. WHO. Preventive chemotherapy in human helminthiasis: coordinated use of anthelminthic drugs in control: a manual for health professionals and programme managers. Geneva: World Health Organization; 2006.Google Scholar
  9. Esrey SA, Potash JB, Roberts L, Shiff C. Effects of improved water supply and sanitation on ascariasis, diarrhoea, dracunculiasis, hookworm infection, schistosomiasis, and trachoma. Bull World Health Organization. 1991;69:609–21.Google Scholar
  10. Jia TW, Melville S, Utzinger J, King C, Zhou XN. Soil-transmitted helminth reinfection after drug treatment: a systematic review and meta-analysis. PLoS Negl Trop Dis. 2012;6:e1621.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  11. Raso G, Vounatsou P, Gosoniu L, Tanner M, N’Goran EK, Utzinger J. Risk factors and spatial patterns of hookworm infection among schoolchildren in a rural area of western Côte d’Ivoire. Int J Parasitol. 2006;36:201–10.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. Clements ACA, Lwambo NJS, Blair L, Nyandindi U, Kaatano G, Kinung’hi S, et al. Bayesian spatial analysis and disease mapping: tools to enhance planning and implementation of a schistosomiasis control programme in Tanzania. Trop Med Int Health. 2006;11:490–503.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  13. Chammartin F, Scholte RGC, Guimarães LH, Tanner M, Utzinger J, Vounatsou P. Soil-transmitted helminth infection in South America: a systematic review and geostatistical meta-analysis. Lancet Infect Dis. 2013;13:507–18.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. Karagiannis-Voules DA, Biedermann P, Ekpo UF, Garba A, Langer E, Mathieu E, et al. Spatial and temporal distribution of soil-transmitted helminth infection in sub-Saharan Africa: a systematic review and geostatistical meta-analysis. Lancet Infect Dis. 2015;15:74–84.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. Brooker SJ, Clements ACA, Bundy DAP. Global epidemiology, ecology and control of soil-transmitted helminth infections. Adv Parasitol. 2006;62:221–61.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  16. Keiser J, N’Goran EK, Traoré M, Lohourignon KL, Singer BH, Lengeler C, et al. Polyparasitism with Schistosoma mansoni, geohelminths, and intestinal protozoa in rural Côte d’Ivoire. J Parasitol. 2002;88:461–6.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. Raso G, Luginbühl A, Acka CA, Tian-Bi YNT, Silué KD, Matthys B, et al. Multiple parasite infections and their relationship to self-reported morbidity in a community of rural Côte d’Ivoire. Int J Epidemiol. 2004;33:1092–102.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. Coulibaly JT, Fürst T, Silué KD, Knopp S, Hauri D, Ouattara M, et al. Intestinal parasitic infections in schoolchildren in different settings of Côte d’Ivoire: effect of diagnostic approach and implications for control. Parasit Vectors. 2014;5:135.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  19. Lo NC, Bogoch II, Blackburn BG, Raso G, N’Goran EK, Coulibaly JT, et al. Comparison of community-wide, integrated mass drug administration strategies for schistosomiasis and soil-transmitted helminthiasis: a cost-effectiveness modelling study. Lancet Glob Health. 2015;3:e629–38.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. Utzinger J, N’Goran EK, Ossey YA, Booth M, Traoré M, Lohourignon KL, et al. Rapid screening for Schistosoma mansoni in western Côte d’Ivoire using a simple school questionnaire. Bull World Health Organ. 2000;78:389–98.PubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  21. Raso G, Matthys B, N’Goran EK, Tanner M, Vounatsou P, Utzinger J. Spatial risk prediction and mapping of Schistosoma mansoni infections among schoolchildren living in western Côte d’Ivoire. Parasitology. 2005;131:97–108.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. Assaré RK, Lai YS, Yapi A, Tian-Bi YNT, Ouattara M, Yao PK, et al. The spatial distribution of Schistosoma mansoni infection in four regions of western Côte d’Ivoire. Geospat Health. 2015;10:69–79.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  23. Yapi RB, Hürlimann E, Houngbedji CA, Ndri PB, Silué KD, Soro G, et al. Infection and co-infection with helminths and Plasmodium among school children in Côte d’Ivoire: results from a national cross-sectional survey. PLoS Negl Trop Dis. 2014;8:e2913.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  24. Diggle P, Lophaven S. Bayesian geostatistical design. Scand J Stat. 2006;33:53–64.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  25. Montresor A, Crompton DWT, Gyorkos TW, Savioli L. Helminth control in school-age children. A guide for managers of control programmes in planning. Geneva: World Health Organization; 2002.Google Scholar
  26. Katz N, Chaves A, Pellegrino J. A simple device for quantitative stool thick-smear technique in schistosomiasis mansoni. Rev Inst Med Trop São Paulo. 1972;14:397–400.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  27. Yap P, Fürst T, Müller I, Kriemler S, Utzinger J, Steinmann P. Determining soil-transmitted helminth infection status and physical fitness of school-aged children. J Vis Exp. 2012;66:e3966.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  28. Speich B, Ali SM, Ame SM, Albonico M, Utzinger J, Keiser J. Quality control in the diagnosis of Trichuris trichiura and Ascaris lumbricoides using the Kato-Katz technique: experience from three randomised controlled trials. Parasit Vectors. 2015;8:82.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  29. Gelfand AE, Smith AFM. Sampling-based approaches to calculating marginal densities. J Am Stat Assoc. 1990;85:398–409.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  30. Berger JO, Barbieri MM. Optimal predictive model selection. Ann Stat. 2004;32:870–97.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  31. George EI, McCulloch RE. Variable selection via Gibbs sampling. J Am Stat Assoc. 1993;88:881–9.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  32. Scheipl F, Fahrmeir L, Kneib T. Spike-and-slab priors for function selection in structured additive regression models. J Am Stat Assoc. 2012;107:1518–32.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  33. Cressie N. The origins of kriging. Math Geol. 1990;22:239–52.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  34. Spiegelhalter DJ, Best NG, Carlin BP, Van Der Linde A. Bayesian measures of model complexity and fit. J R Stat Soc Ser B (Stat Methodol). 2002;64:583–639.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  35. WHO. Soil-transmitted helminthiasis: eliminating soil-transmitted helminthiasis as a public health problem in children: progress report 2001–2010 and strategic plan 2011–2020. Geneva: World Health Organization; 2012.Google Scholar
  36. de Silva N, Hall A. Using the prevalence of individual species of intestinal nematode worms to estimate the combined prevalence of any species. PLoS Negl Trop Dis. 2010;4:e655.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  37. Pullan RL, Brooker SJ. The global limits and population at risk of soil-transmitted helminth infections in 2010. Parasit Vectors. 2012;5:81.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  38. Raso G, Vounatsou P, McManus DP, N’Goran EK, Utzinger J. A Bayesian approach to estimate the age-specific prevalence of Schistosoma mansoni and implications for schistosomiasis control. Int J Parasitol. 2007;37:1491–500.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  39. Bonfoh B, Raso G, Koné I, Dao D, Girardin O, Cissé G, et al. Research in a war zone. Nature. 2011;474:569–71.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  40. Hotez PJ. Hookworm and poverty. Ann N Y Acad Sci. 2008;1136:38–44.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  41. Schur N, Hürlimann E, Garba A, Traoré MS, Ndir O, Ratard RC, et al. Geostatistical model-based estimates of schistosomiasis prevalence among individuals aged ≤ 20 years in West Africa. PLoS Negl Trop Dis. 2011;5:e1194.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  42. Hürlimann E, Schur N, Boutsika K, Stensgaard AS, Laserna de Himpsl M, Ziegelbauer K, et al. Toward an open-access global database for mapping, control, and surveillance of neglected tropical diseases. PLoS Negl Trop Dis. 2011;5:e1404.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  43. Campbell SJ, Savage GB, Gray DJ, Atkinson JAM, Magalhães RJS, Nery SV, et al. Water, sanitation, and hygiene (WASH): a critical component for sustainable soil-transmitted helminth and schistosomiasis control. PLoS Negl Trop Dis. 2014;8:e2651.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  44. WHO. Prevention and control of schistosomiasis and soil-transmitted helminthiasis: report of a WHO expert committee. WHO Tech Rep Ser. 2002;912:1–57.Google Scholar
  45. Booth M, Vounatsou P, N’Goran EK, Tanner M, Utzinger J. The influence of sampling effort and the performance of the Kato-Katz technique in diagnosing Schistosoma mansoni and hookworm co-infections in rural Côte d’Ivoire. Parasitology. 2003;127:525–31.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  46. Knopp S, Mgeni AF, Khamis IS, Steinmann P, Stothard JR, Rollinson D, et al. Diagnosis of soil-transmitted helminths in the era of preventive chemotherapy: effect of multiple stool sampling and use of different diagnostic techniques. PLoS Negl Trop Dis. 2008;2:e331.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar

Copyright

© Yapi et al. 2016

Comments

By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.

Advertisement

Parasites & Vectors

ISSN: 1756-3305

Contact us