Open Access

Newly discovered population of Aedes japonicus japonicus (Diptera: Culicidae) in Upper Bavaria, Germany, and Salzburg, Austria, is closely related to the Austrian/Slovenian bush mosquito population

Contributed equally
Parasites & Vectors20169:163

https://doi.org/10.1186/s13071-016-1447-z

Received: 16 December 2015

Accepted: 10 March 2016

Published: 21 March 2016

Abstract

Background

The German mosquito surveillance instrument ‘Mueckenatlas’ requests the general public to collect and submit mosquito specimens. Among these, increasing numbers of individuals of invasive species have been registered. Specimens of the Asian bush mosquito Aedes japonicus japonicus submitted from German Upper Bavaria, where this species had not previously been recorded, triggered regional monitoring in mid-2015.

Methods

The search for Ae. j. japonicus breeding sites and developmental stages concentrated on cemeteries in the municipality of origin of the submitted specimens and, subsequently, in the whole region. A virtual grid consisting of 10 × 10 km2 cells in which up to three cemeteries were checked, was laid over the region. A cell was considered positive as soon as Ae. j. japonicus larvae were detected, and regarded negative when no larvae could be found in any of the cemeteries inspected. All cells surrounding a positive cell were screened accordingly. A subset of collected Aedes j. japonicus specimens was subjected to microsatellite and nad4 sequence analyses, and obtained data were compared to individuals from previously discovered European populations.

Results

Based on the grid cells, an area of approximately 900 km2 was populated by Ae. j. japonicus in Upper Bavaria and neighbouring Austria. Genetic analyses of microsatellites and nad4 gene sequences generated one genotype out of two previously described for Europe and three haplotypes, one of which had previously been found in Europe only in Ae. j. japonicus samples from a population in East Austria and Slovenia. The genetic analysis suggests the new population is closely related to the Austrian/Slovenian population.

Conclusion

As Ae. j. japonicus is well adapted to temperate climates, it has a strong tendency to expand and to colonise new territories in Central Europe, which is facilitated by human-mediated, passive transportation. The new population in Upper Bavaria/Austria is the seventh separate population described in Europe. According to our data, it originated from a previously detected population in eastern Austria/Slovenia and not from an introduction event from abroad. The dispersal and population dynamics of Ae. j. japonicus should be thoroughly surveyed, as this species is a potential vector of disease agents.

Keywords

Aedes japonicus japonicus Asian bush mosquito Austria Germany Human-mediated displacement Microsatellites nad4 haplotypes Population genetics Spread

Background

The invasive Asian bush mosquito Aedes (Hulecoeteomyia) japonicus japonicus (Theobald, 1901) (taxonomic nomenclature according to [1]) was first reported from Europe in 2000 when it was detected in Normandy (Orne Department) in northern France [2]. While the species was later eliminated there [3], another population detected in 2002 in Belgium succeeded in establishing [4]. After more than a decade of remaining locally restricted, it was eventually controlled and is now also considered eliminated (pers. comm. Versteirt 2016). Several additional populated areas were discovered in Europe between 2008 and 2014 (Fig. 1): Switzerland/Southwest Germany/France [3, 5, 6], west Germany [7], north Germany [8], Austria/Slovenia/Croatia/Hungary [911] and The Netherlands [12].
Fig. 1

Geographical location of previously detected Ae. j. japonicus populations in Europe (red dots and circles) and of the newly discovered population (Fig. 2 inset)

Aedes j. japonicus is native to east Asia (Japan, Korea, southern China, southeastern Russia) where it colonises regions climatically similar to central Europe [13]. It has been transported intercontinentally by air and sea since the early 1990s and was demonstrated as invasive in the late 1990s in the US where it is now widely distributed [14].

Aedes j. japonicus is a potential vector of disease agents, able to transmit Getah, Japanese encephalitis, West Nile, dengue, chikungunya and Rift Valley fever viruses in the laboratory [1519]. In the field, it has been found infected with Japanese encephalitis, West Nile and La Crosse viruses [2022].

After decades of neglect, the occurrence and spatiotemporal distribution of culicid species, including invasive ones such as Ae. j. japonicus, have been thoroughly monitored in Germany since 2011. In addition to active data sampling by trapping, a passive approach was implemented in 2012 in the form of a citizen-science project. The ‘Mueckenatlas’ (mosquito atlas) calls upon private persons to collect mosquitoes and submit them for mapping spatiotemporal mosquito occurrence [23]. Since its launch, it has contributed thousands of distribution records and has been particularly valuable regarding invasive mosquito species. It enabled the detection of the west and north German populations of Ae. j. japonicus in 2012 and 2013 [7, 8], of a reproductive population of the Asian tiger mosquito Ae. albopictus in south Germany in 2014 [24] and of the introduction of Ae. koreicus in 2015 [25].

In early July 2015, three adult specimens of Ae. j. japonicus were submitted to the ‘Mueckenatlas’ team from Berchtesgaden, a town in Upper Bavaria, southeastern Germany, immediately on the border with Austria. Since this region was far from areas of previous Ae. j. japonicus documentation, the submissions prompted immediate local monitoring.

Methods

Mosquito collection

On the occasion of a visit to Upper Bavaria (inset in Fig. 1) in August 2015, water containers on the premises and surroundings of the submitter were checked for Ae. j. japonicus immature stages. Larvae were found in water accumulated in the inverted top of a rain-water barrel in the garden of the submitter and in a bucket filled with debris and water in the neighbour’s garden. An inspection of the municipality’s cemetery, the distance to which was 1.3 km (direct line), also revealed Ae. j. japonicus larvae in many of the numerous water containers.

To gain an impression of the size of the populated area, a virtual grid with 10 × 10 km cells was laid over the region (Fig. 2). Starting in Berchtesgaden, all cells surrounding Ae. j. japonicus-positive cells were checked by inspecting water containers in cemeteries, as suggested by Vezzani [26] and demonstrated to be efficient by various other authors (e.g. [3, 6]). In smaller cemeteries all natural and artificial water-holding containers identified were examined, while in larger cemeteries the inspection was limited in time to one hour. Cells were considered positive as soon as Ae. j. japonicus larvae were found, irrespective of the number of cemeteries screened. Cells were rated negative if no larvae could be found in the cemeteries of three villages (provided three villages were present in the cell), or in one or two cemeteries in some more alpine and little-populated cells when no further cemeteries could be located.
Fig. 2

Area coverage of the Upper Bavarian/Austrian Ae. j. japonicus population (red squares: grid cells positive; green squares: grid cells negative by cemetery inspection; blue cells: not sampled due to mountainous settings without human settlements; figures in green cells: number of cemeteries identified and examined; figures in red cells: number of cemeteries examined until finding of Ae. j. japonicus; black circle: grid cell with Ae. j. japonicus submissions to the ‘Mueckenatlas’)

Aedes j. japonicus larvae were identified on the spot by their habitus and behaviour (cf. [6]) but samples from each collection site were taken to the laboratory for further development until adult emergence and genetic analyses. Adults were identified morphologically according to the key by Schaffner et al. [27]. For confirmation, at least one specimen per site was identified genetically by CO1 DNA barcoding [12].

Genetic analysis

To unveil putative relationships to other populations of Ae. j. japonicus in Europe, and to identify possible source populations, population genetic analyses, using nad4 (NADH dehydrogenase subunit 4) gene polymorphisms, were carried out on 30 specimens from the colonised area, according to protocols presented by Fonseca et al. [28] and Zielke et al. [29]. The same 30 individuals were subjected to analysis of seven microsatellite loci, with the results interpreted with GeneMapper (Applied Biosystems/Thermo Fisher Scientific, Waltham, MA, USA), STRUCTURE [30], STRUCTURE HARVESTER [31] and GenAlEx [32]. This approach had been specifically adapted and optimized to Ae. j. japonicus population genetics in previous work and has been proven effective [28, 29, 33, 34].

For DNA extraction, legs of adult mosquitoes or three to four abdominal segments of larvae were processed using the QIAamp DNA Mini Kit (Qiagen, Hilden, Germany), according to the manufacturer’s instructions.

Results

Aedes j. japonicus immature specimens were found in nine grid cells, corresponding to an infested area of about 900 km2 stretching from Upper Bavaria to the Austrian federal state of Salzburg (Fig. 2). Of the nine grid cells positive, Ae. j. japonicus was found in the first cemetery checked in six cells, while in three cells the second cemetery checked was populated.

Among the analysed individuals (one individual was not analysable), three nad4 haplotypes were found: the ubiquitous H1 (5 individuals), as well as H9 (10 individuals) and H10 (14 individuals) (naming of haplotypes according to [34]), the latter previously described only in the population occurring in southeastern Austria and Slovenia [33].

To comparatively analyse the microsatellite data of the newly discovered Upper Bavarian/Austrian population, data of formerly examined specimens from populations found in Switzerland/southwest Germany, Belgium, west Germany, north Germany, The Netherlands and Austria/Slovenia [29, 33] were included (Table 1). A check for Hardy-Weinberg equilibrium showed significant deviations on locus OJ10 in the Upper Bavarian/Austrian population, due both to higher and to lower than expected heterozygosity.
Table 1

Number of specimens and determined genotypes of other European Ae. j. japonicus populations comparatively examined by microsatellite analyses

Population

Number of individuals

Principal microsatellite genotype

Reference

Austria/Slovenia

36/60

1

[2933]

Belgium

18

1

[29]

West Germany

197

2

[29]

North Germany

32

2

[33]

Switzerland/Southwest Germany

22/80

1, 2

[2933]

Netherlands

43

1, 2

[33]

The microsatellite data were further subjected to a Bayesian cluster analysis with the programme STRUCTURE [30], demonstrating genotype 1 for the Upper Bavarian/Austrian population out of two genotypes occurring in Europe (Fig. 3), as identified as the optimal number of genetic clusters for the complete dataset by STRUCTURE HARVESTER [31].
Fig. 3

Bar plot of a Bayesian cluster analysis done with STRUCTURE [30] (light blue = genotype 1, dark blue = genotype 2)

A principal coordinates analysis, based on a pairwise population matrix of Nei’s genetic distances (Additional file 1) and performed with GenAlEx [32] on the microsatellite data, shows a close genetic proximity of the newly discovered Upper Bavarian/Austrian population to the formerly analysed Austrian/Slovenian population (Fig. 4). The plot shows four groups of Ae. j. japonicus populations in Europe: The Belgian population is on top of a triangle with roughly the same genetic distance to the north and west German populations in one corner and to the Austrian/Slovenian and the Upper Bavarian/Austrian populations in the other corner. The Swiss/southwest German and Dutch populations, which are genetically more heterogeneous than the others (cf. [33]), are located between the north and west German populations on the one side and the Austrian/Slovenian and the Upper Bavarian/Austrian populations on the other side (Fig. 4).
Fig. 4

Principal coordinates analysis plot of pairwise population values of Nei’s genetic distance for the seven European Ae. j. japonicus populations

Discussion

A fourth German population of Ae. j. japonicus, representing the seventh European population of this species, was detected in southeastern Germany crossing the border to Austria. The distribution of this isolated population was roughly determined by a grid cell pattern with findings of immature stages of the species in some cells surrounded by cells without findings. This approach can serve merely as an indication of the extent of the population, as only cemeteries were inspected in the cells, and of these, only three per cell. Neither natural potential breeding sites, e.g. tree holes in forests, nor artificial breeding sites in gardens were checked.

No estimate is currently possible for the time of establishment of the Upper Bavarian/Austrian population. Its assumed distribution area is comparable in size to that of the north German population, which is supposed to be a relatively recent offshoot of the west German population [33] but has existed at least since 2012 [8]. Due to the area coverage, the Upper Bavarian/Austrian population might be of similar age, although a BG Sentinel trap operated in the affected area of Upper Bavaria from 2011 to 2013 (mid-April to late October each year once a week for 24 hours) never collected an Ae. j. japonicus specimen. The BG Sentinel is not particularly effective at collecting Ae. j. japonicus [35], but had already shown this species to occur in another German region previously not known to be populated (Werner & Kampen, unpubl.).

Climatic conditions are rather different in Upper Bavaria and northern Germany. German Upper Bavaria and the Austrian federal state of Salzburg are located at the northern boundaries of the Alps (minimum regional altitudes c. 400 m a.s.l.) and are characterised by a rather low annual average temperature (c. 7–8 °C) and monthly average temperatures exceeding 10 °C only from May to September. Snowfall typically occurs from early November to late April. Now that the distribution area of the Ae. j. japonicus population in Upper Bavaria/Austria has been determined, its future development and spread in this short-seasoned region should be directly compared with the north German population.

The nad4-haplotypes characterising the newly discovered Upper Bavarian/Austrian population suggest descent from the formerly detected Austrian/Slovenian population. Haplotype H9 is also known from the Belgian and the Dutch populations, but neither H9 nor H10 occur in any of the other German populations of Ae. j. japonicus. H10 had previously been demonstrated exclusively in the Austrian/Slovenian population in Europe. Outside of Europe, this haplotype has so far been described only from populations in New York and Connecticut in the USA [28], although it probably also exists in Asia where few studies have been made. With the available data, non-European source populations of the Upper Bavarian, Austrian and Slovenian individuals, therefore, cannot be narrowed down.

Microsatellite analyses show that the Upper Bavarian/Austrian population is assignable to genotype 1, the first Ae. j. japonicus genotype detected in Europe [29], although one individual suggests admixture with genotype 2. A close relationship with the Austrian/Slovenian population is shown, underlining the nad4 haplotype results. Conversely, the Upper Bavarian/Austrian population does not seem to be closely related to or to have the same origin as one of the other German populations.

Conclusions

As the distribution area of the newly detected Ae. j. japonicus population in Upper Bavaria/Austria is beyond the flight distance to the population in east Austria, human-mediated transport of founder individuals, such as by eggs attached to used tyres, must be postulated. The Austrian Tauern Autobahn (motorway A10), which, coming from Slovenia, passes the Upper Bavarian/Austrian distribution area of Ae. j. japonicus, might be a possible route for the displacement of mosquitoes from east Austria or Slovenia into the Austrian federal state of Salzburg.

Given the high ecological plasticity of Ae. j. japonicus, more populations should be expected to emerge in subsequent years, with spatial coverage of large parts of central Europe.

Abbreviations

CO1: 

cytochrome c oxidase subunit 1

nad4: 

NADH dehydrogenase subunit 4

Declarations

Acknowledgements

This work was financially supported by the German Federal Ministry of Food and Agriculture (BMEL) through the Federal Office for Agriculture and Food (BLE), grant numbers 2819104615 and 2819104115. We are grateful to Jutta Falland, Juliane Horenk and Oliver Tauchmann for excellent technical assistance in the laboratory and to Peter Adler, Clemson University, SC, USA, for language-editing of the manuscript.

Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.

Authors’ Affiliations

(1)
Leibniz-Centre for Agricultural Landscape Research
(2)
Friedrich-Loeffler-Institut, Federal Research Institute for Animal Health

References

  1. Wilkerson RC, Linton YM, Fonseca DM, Schultz TR, Price DC, Strickman DA. Making mosquito taxonomy useful: a stable classification of tribe Aedini that balances utility with current knowledge of evolutionary relationships. PLoS ONE. 2015;10:e0133602.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  2. Schaffner F, Chouin S, Guilloteau J. First record of Ochlerotatus (Finlaya) japonicus japonicus (Theobald, 1901) in metropolitan France. J Am Mosq Control Assoc. 2003;19:1–5.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. Schaffner F, Kaufmann C, Hegglin D, Mathis A. The invasive mosquito Aedes japonicus in Central Europe. Med Vet Entomol. 2009;23:448–51.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. Versteirt V, Schaffner F, Garros C, Dekoninck W, Coosemans M, van Bortel W. Introduction and establishment of the exotic mosquito species Aedes japonicus japonicus (Diptera: Culicidae) in Belgium. J Med Entomol. 2009;46:1464–7.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. Huber K, Pluskota B, Jöst A, Hoffmann K, Becker N. Status of the invasive species Aedes japonicus japonicus (Diptera: Culicidae) in southwest Germany in 2011. J Vector Ecol. 2012;37:462–5.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. Krebs T, Bindler P, L’Ambert G, Toti C, Perrin Y, Jourdain F. First establishment of Aedes japonicus japonicus (Theobald, 1901) (Diptera: Culicidae) in France in 2013 and its impact on public health. J Vector Ecol. 2014;39:437–40.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. Kampen H, Zielke D, Werner D. A new focus of Aedes japonicus japonicus (Diptera, Culicidae) distribution in western Germany: rapid spread or a further introduction event? Parasit Vectors. 2012;5:284.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  8. Werner D, Kampen H. The further spread of Aedes japonicus japonicus (Diptera, Culicidae) towards northern Germany. Parasitol Res. 2013;112:3665–8.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. Seidel B, Duh D, Nowotny N, Allerberger F. First record of the mosquitoes Aedes (Ochlerotatus) japonicus japonicus (Theobald, 1901) in Austria and Slovenia 2011 and for Aedes (Stegomyia) albopictus (Skuse, 1895) in Austria 2012. Entomol Zeitschr. 2012;122:223–6 [in German].Google Scholar
  10. Indra A. Stechmücken-Surveillance in der Steiermark. Report to the ‚Österreichische Agentur für Gesundheit und Ernährungssicherheit GmbH‘, Vienna, Austria. 2013.Google Scholar
  11. Kalan K, Buzan VE, Ivović V. Distribution of two invasive mosquito species in Slovenia. Parasit Vectors. 2014;7 Suppl 1:9.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  12. Ibáñez-Justicia A, Kampen H, Braks M, Schaffner F, Steeghs M, Werner D, et al. First report of established population of Aedes japonicus japonicus (Theobald, 1901) (Diptera, Culicidae) in the Netherlands. J Eur Mosquito Contr Assoc. 2014;32:9–13.Google Scholar
  13. Tanaka K, Mizusawa K, Saugstad ES. A revision of the adult and larval mosquitoes of Japan (including the Ryukyu Archipelago and the Ogasawara Islands) and Korea (Diptera: Culicidae). Contrib Amer Ent Inst. 1979;16:1–987.Google Scholar
  14. Kampen H, Werner D. Out of the bush: the Asian bush mosquito Aedes japonicus japonicus (Theobald, 1901) (Diptera, Culicidae) becomes invasive. Parasit Vectors. 2014;7:59.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  15. Takashima I, Hashimoto N. Getah virus in several species of mosquitoes. Trans R Soc Trop Med Hyg. 1985;79:546–50.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. Takashima I, Rosen L. Horizontal and vertical transmission of Japanese encephalitis virus by Aedes japonicus (Diptera: Culicidae). J Med Entomol. 1989;26:454–8.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. Sardelis MR, Turell MJ. Ochlerotatus j. japonicus in Frederick County, Maryland: discovery, distribution, and vector competence for West Nile virus. J Am Mosq Control Assoc. 2001;17:137–41.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. Schaffner F, Vazeille M, Kaufmann C, Failloux A-B, Mathis A. Vector competence of Aedes japonicus for chikungunya and dengue viruses. Eur Mosq Bull. 2011;29:141–2.Google Scholar
  19. Turell MJ, Byrd BD, Harrison BA. Potential for populations of Aedes j. japonicus to transmit Rift Valley fever virus in the USA. J Am Mosq Control Assoc. 2013;29:133–7.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. Chagin KP, Kondratiev PI. Vectors of autumnal (Japanese) encephalitis in Primor’ye region and measures for controlling them. Med Parazitol Parazit Bolezni. 1943;12:34–44 [In Russian].Google Scholar
  21. CDC (Centers for Disease Control and Prevention). Mosquito species in which West Nile virus has been detected, United States, 1999–2012. 2012. http://www.cdc.gov/westnile/resources/pdfs/mosquitospecies1999-2012.pdf (accessed 9 December 2015).Google Scholar
  22. Harris MC, Dotseth EJ, Jackson BT, Zink SD, Marek PE, Kramer LD, et al. La Crosse virus in Aedes japonicus japonicus mosquitoes in the Appalachian Region, United States. Emerg Infect Dis. 2015;21:646–9.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  23. Kampen H, Medlock JM, Vaux AG, Koenraadt CJ, van Vliet AJ, Bartumeus F, et al. Approaches to passive mosquito surveillance in the EU. Parasit Vectors. 2015;8:9.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  24. Werner D, Kampen H. Aedes albopictus breeding in southern Germany, 2014. Parasitol Res. 2015;114:831–4.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  25. Werner D, Zielke DE, Kampen H. First record of Aedes koreicus Diptera: Culicidae) in Germany. Parasitol Res. 2016;115:1331–4.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  26. Vezzani D. Artificial container-breeding mosquitoes and cemeteries: a perfect match. Trop Med Int Health. 2007;12:299–313.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  27. Schaffner F, Angel G, Geoffroy B, Hervy JP, Rhaiem A, Brunhes J. The mosquitoes of Europe (CD-Rom). Montpellier: IRD Éditions & EID Méditerrannée; 2001.Google Scholar
  28. Fonseca DM, Widdel AK, Hutchinson M, Spichiger SE, Kramer LD. Fine-scale spatial and temporal population genetics of Aedes j. japonicus, a new US mosquito, reveal multiple introductions. Mol Ecol. 2010;19:1559–72.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  29. Zielke DE, Werner D, Kampen H, Schaffner F, Fonseca D. Unexpected patterns of admixture in German populations of Aedes japonicus japonicus (Diptera: Culicidae) underscore the importance of human intervention. PLoS ONE. 2014;9:e99093.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  30. Pritchard JK, Stephens M, Donnelly P. Inference of population structure using multilocus genotype data. Genetics. 2000;155:945–59.PubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  31. Earl DA, von Holdt BM. STRUCTURE HARVESTER: a website and program for visualizing STRUCTURE output and implementing the Evanno method. Conserv Genet. 2012;4:359–61.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  32. Peakall R, Smouse PE. GenAlEx 6.5: genetic analysis in Excel. Population genetic software for teaching and research − an update. Bioinformatics. 2012;28:2537–9.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  33. Zielke DE, Ibáñez-Justicia A, Kalan K, Merdic E, Kampen H, Werner D. Recently discovered Aedes japonicus japonicus (Diptera: Culicidae) populations in The Netherlands and northern Germany resulted from a new introduction event and from a split from an existing population. Parasit Vectors. 2015;8:40.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  34. Fonseca DM, Campbell S, Crans WJ, Mogi M, Miyagi I, Toma T, Bullians M, Andreadis TG, Berry RL, Pagac B, Sardelis MR, Wilkerson RC. Aedes (Finlaya) japonicus (Diptera: Culicidae), a newly recognized mosquito in the United States: analyses of genetic variation in the United States and putative source populations. J Med Entomol. 2001;38:135–46.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  35. Rochlin I, Kawalkowski M, Ninivaggi DV. Comparison of Mosquito Magnet and Biogents Sentinel traps for operational surveillance of container-inhabiting Aedes (Diptera: Culicidae) species. J Med Entomol. 2016;53:454–9.Google Scholar

Copyright

© Zielke et al. 2016

Comments

By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.

Advertisement