Open Access

The level of embryonation influences detection of Ostertagia ostertagi eggs by semi-quantitative PCR

Parasites & Vectors20169:368

https://doi.org/10.1186/s13071-016-1657-4

Received: 9 March 2016

Accepted: 20 June 2016

Published: 29 June 2016

Abstract

Background

The Internal Transcribed Spacer 2 (ITS2) is a candidate diagnostic marker of the pathogenic cattle nematode Ostertagia ostertagi. The aims of this study were: (i) to document and quantify how the development of O. ostertagi eggs affects ITS2 copies under different storage conditions, and (ii) to suggest optimal storage conditions for faecal samples in a diagnostic pipeline that involves detection and semi-quantification by real-time semi-quantitative polymerase chain reaction (qPCR).

Findings

Eggs of Ostertagia ostertagi were obtained from fresh faeces and stored at 4 °C or 25 °C under aerobic or anaerobic (vacuum packing) conditions. Development was monitored by microscopy for up to 336 h, and the ITS2 copies were determined by qPCR from a fixed number of parasites. Under aerobic conditions at 25 °C, embryonation and a significant increase of ITS2 copies (P < 0.0001) were observed after 12 h. At 4 °C, embryonation occurred after 168 h with a trend towards increased ITS2 copies. Anaerobic conditions inhibited egg development at both temperatures and no significant increase in ITS2 copies was noticed (P = 0.90). ITS2 copies were analysed for each parasite stage: first-stage larvae (L1) exhibited significantly higher copy numbers (20,353 ± 1,950) than unembryonated eggs (568 ± 168; P < 0.0001) with lower coefficient of variation (33 vs 266 %).

Conclusions

Aerobic storage of O. ostertagi eggs at 25 °C led to a significant increase in ITS2 copies after 12 h due to embryonation and subsequent hatching. In contrast, anaerobic storage (vacuum packing) at 25 °C completely inhibited egg development and any undesirable semi-quantification bias for up to 336 h. Hence, vacuum packing is an optimal storage strategy prior to molecular diagnostic analyses. Alternatively, aerobic storage at 4 °C for up to 72 h can be used. Due to high copy numbers and lower genetic variation, the L1 stage may be considered for diagnostics and further molecular research.

Keywords

Ostertagia ostertagi Egg development First-stage larvae Real-time semi-quantitative PCR ITS2

Background

Diagnosis of economically important strongylids [1] has traditionally relied on coproculture and differentiation of third-stage larvae (L3) which is laborious [24] and prone to low specificity and sensitivity [5, 6]. Furthermore, early diagnosis of anthelmintic resistance (AR) and monitoring of the species surviving anthelmintic treatment requires increasingly efficient methods [7]. In order to overcome these limitations and improve the diagnostic options, molecular methodologies have been developed for sensitive species identification of a number of important gastrointestinal nematodes of small ruminants [811] and cattle [1214]. Recently, a real-time semi-quantitative polymerase chain reaction (qPCR) targeting the Internal Transcribed Spacer 2 (ITS2) of the ribosomal DNA (rDNA) was described for species-specific semi-quantification of two important strongylids of cattle, Cooperia oncophora and Ostertagia ostertagi [15]. As promising diagnostic tools, molecular methodologies must have all sources of bias documented throughout the complete diagnostic pipeline and in this context, storage of the samples can introduce bias due to rapid development of nematode eggs. Previous research has studied the effect of chemical preservation of strongylid eggs on qPCR results [16] but systematic and rigorous testing of the impact of anaerobic/aerobic storage and varying temperatures throughout time are lacking.

The aims of this study were: (i) to document and quantify how the development of O. ostertagi eggs affects ITS2 copies under a multitude of storage conditions, and (ii) to suggest optimal storage conditions for faecal samples/bovine nematode eggs in a diagnostic pipeline that involves detection and semi-quantification by molecular methodologies.

Methods

Experimental design

Eggs of Ostertagia ostertagi were stored under anaerobic or aerobic conditions at 4 °C or 25 °C for durations of 0, 12, 24, 48, 60, 72, 168 and 336 h. Biological triplicate samples were analysed by qPCR (Fig. 1) and correlation between the stage of development (Fig. 2) and ITS2 copies was analysed.
Fig. 1

Schematic overview of the study design. Anaerobic samples (n = 9 × 2) contained 10 g of freshly recovered faeces with Ostertagia ostertagi eggs and stored in vacuum bags under anaerobic conditions. Samples were subjected to either 4 °C or 25 °C for duration of 0 to 336 h. To stop egg development the samples were frozen at -20 °C. Subsequently, O. ostertagi were isolated and differentiated to developmental stage. Finally, 25× O. ostertagi eggs or L1 were counted and transferred to a clean petri dish. This was done in triplicates of each sample and ITS2 copies were quantified by qPCR. Aerobic samples (n = 9 × 2) were produced identically to anaerobic samples but eggs were isolated from faeces before storage and differentiated immediately at each time point. A total of 108 biological replicates were subjected to qPCR semi-quantification. Abbreviations: EPG, eggs per gram; ITS2, Internal Transcribed Spacer 2; qPCR, real-time semi-quantitative polymerase chain reaction

Fig. 2

Ostertagia ostertagi in various stages of development. a Unembryonated egg. b Early embryonated egg. c Embryonated egg. d First-stage larvae, L1

Setup of aerobic samples

Ostertagia ostertagi eggs were isolated from fresh faeces recovered from monospecies-infected calves by adding 26 ml water to 4 g of faeces which were mixed and sieved through gauze (type 28, BSN Medical, Hamburg, Germany) into two 15 ml Falcon tubes and centrifuged at 172 g for 10 min at 4 °C. The pellet was added 8 ml flotation fluid (saturated NaCl with 50 g glucose per 100 ml; density = 1.27 g/ml, [17]) and sieved again (20 μm, Buch & Holm A/S, Herlev, Denmark). The eggs were deposited in 9 × 2 Petri dishes containing 1–5 × 103 eggs each. At each time point, eggs and/or L1 (n = 15) were differentiated (Fig. 2) and photographed at a magnification of 400× (DMR Type 020–525.024, Leica Microsystems, Wetzlar, Germany). Subsequently, to stop egg/larvae development, the Petri dishes were frozen at -20 °C for two weeks. After thawing, 25 O. ostertagi eggs or larvae were counted under a stereo microscope (Type M125, Leica Microsystems, Wetzlar, Germany) and transferred to a clean Petri dish. Three biological triplicates were produced for each time point.

Setup of anaerobic samples

From the same faeces used for aerobic samples, aliquots of 10 g were immediately transferred to 9 × 2 individual plastic bags (ORVED, Musile di Piave, Italy). Anaerobic conditions were produced by a vacuum-sealer (Freshield Touch, CSE Co, Gyeonggi-do, Korea). Following storage for the specified periods, the bags were frozen at -20 °C for two weeks. Subsequently, the eggs were isolated, differentiated, photographed, and quantified to produce triplicate samples for qPCR as described for the aerobic samples.

DNA extraction and semi-quantitative real-time PCR analysis

Biological triplicates of eggs and/or L1 were added 1,000 μl lysis buffer (Buffer ATL, QIAGEN, Hilden, Germany) and 20 μl of Proteinase K (20 mg/ml, QIAGEN), re-sealed with Parafilm® M (Bemis NA, Oshkosh, USA) and incubated at 56 °C for 2 h. After incubation, each sample was mixed by gentle shaking and DNA was extracted from 1/5 of the total lysis buffer (200 μl) and processed by QIAamp® DNA Mini Kit (QIAGEN) following the manufacturer’s instructions. Primers and probe targeted a 91 bp stretch in the O. ostertagi ITS2 sequence (GenBank® accession no. AB245021.2) from position 1036 according to Höglund et al. [15]. Duplicate amplifications were performed with a Rotor-gene Q RG-6000® (QIAGEN) in total volumes of 25 μl using 0.65 U Taq2000® polymerase (Agilent Technologies, Santa Clara, CA, USA), 0.3 μM of forward and reverse primer, 0.2 μM probe, 200 μM dNTP and 5.5 mM MgCl2 using 2 μl DNA as template. The cycling conditions were 95 °C for 10 min and amplification for 50 cycles (95 °C for 15 s, 62 °C for 60 s). Semi-quantifications were performed by extrapolating cycle threshold (Ct) values to a standard curve with 2 × 107, 2 × 106, 105, 104 and 103 molecules μl−1 of a plasmid construct comprising the O. ostertagia ITS2 sequence according to Höglund et al. [15]. Positive and negative DNA controls and a water template control were included for each run.

Statistical analysis

Statistical analyses were performed using GraphPad Prism® version 5.02 for Windows (GraphPad Software, La Jolla, CA, USA) and R Commander version 2.0–4 [18]. The temporal effect on ITS2 copies was analysed by one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) on the log transformed ITS2 copies with Dunnett’s post-hoc test with 0 h as the baseline. ITS2 copies were grouped, either uncorrected or corrected for DNA extraction partitioning and compared with the Kruskal-Wallis non-parametric test followed by Dunn’s multiple comparison post-hoc test.

Results

Storage conditions and ITS2 copies

Under aerobic conditions at 4 °C, there was no significant temporal effect on ITS2 copies (ANOVA, F (7,16) = 2.365, P = 0.07) which ranged from a mean (± SEM) of 2,381 ± 196 ITS2 copies at 0 h to 16,191 ± 12,663 at 336 h. Microscopic examination revealed that 67 % of the eggs were embryonated after 168 h and 100 % after 336 h (Fig. 3a). At the 48 h time point, the eggs were lost prior to qPCR due to a human error. At 25 °C, there was a significant temporal effect due to embryonation and subsequent hatching on ITS2 copies (F (6,14) = 66.84, P < 0.0001) which increased from 482 ± 184 ITS2 copies at 0 h to 106,707 ± 29,396 at 72 h. Post-hoc testing revealed significant differences from 12 h of storage and onwards, compared to the 0 h group (all P < 0.0001). Microscopic examination showed 87 % L1 after 24 h and 100 % L1 after 36 h (Fig. 3b). At 168 and 336 h, all L1 were decomposed and unsuitable for exact counting.
Fig. 3

Log-transformed ITS2 copies plotted against developmental stages of Ostertagia ostertagi throughout the four sub-experiments. a 4 °C under aerobic conditions. b 25 °C under aerobic conditions. c 4 °C under anaerobic conditions. d 25 °C under anaerobic conditions. The X-axis indicates storage time. Distributions (%) of developmental stages are plotted on left Y-axis (white bar: unembryonated eggs; brown bar: early embryonated eggs; green bar: embryonated eggs; yellow dotted bar: L1 larvae; shaded bar: decomposed parasites). Developmental stage was determined from photographs of 15 randomly selected eggs from each of nine time points. Log-transformed ITS2 copies are plotted on right Y-axis and are indicated by a black line. ITS2 copies were obtained from qPCR analysis of biological triplicate samples containing DNA from 25 parasites (eggs or larvae). Error bars indicate standard error of the mean (SEM) of log-transformed ITS2 copies

Under anaerobic conditions, there was a significant temporal effect on ITS2 copies at 4 °C (F(8,18) = 17.31, P < 0.0001) ranging from 3,802 ± 508 ITS2 copies at 0 h to 496 ± 121 at 336 h. However, ITS2 copies at 24, 48, 72 and 168 h were not significantly different from 0 h in the post-hoc tests (P > 0.05), and no morphological changes were observed (Fig. 3c).

No significant temporal effect was observed at 25 °C under anaerobic conditions (F(8,18) = 0.41, P = 0.90), and the ITS2 copies ranged from 576 ± 244 ITS2 copies at 0 h to 603 ± 187 at 336 h. Correspondingly, no morphological changes were observed throughout the 336 h of storage at 25 °C under anaerobic conditions (Fig. 3d). The full collection of photographs demonstrating the morphological development in detail is presented in Additional file 1: Figures S1-S34.

Level of development and ITS2 copies

Analysis of developmental stages (Table 1) revealed that the number of ITS2 copies of L1 was significantly different from those of the other three developmental stages (H = 39.99, P < 0.0001), ranging from 2,841 ± 840 ITS2 copies for unembryonated eggs to 101,767 ± 9,753 for L1 (Fig. 4). Comparison of mean ITS2 copies corrected for genomic DNA partitioning revealed that a single unembryonated egg contained 568 ± 168 ITS2 copies compared to 20,353 ± 1,950 ITS2 copies detected in one L1 larva. The coefficient of variation ranged from 266 % for the unembryonated eggs to 33 % for hatched L1 (Table 1). The groups “early embryonated eggs” and “embryonated eggs” comprised 54 % and 84 % of the designated stages, whereas “unembryonated eggs” and “L1” comprised 100 %.
Table 1

ITS2 copies obtained from four stages of development of Ostertagia ostertagi

 

Unembryonated eggs

Early embryonated eggs

Embryonated eggs

First-stage larvae (L1)

 

(n = 81)

(n = 3)

(n = 6)

(n = 12)

Mean sample ± SEM (molecules μl-1)a

2,841 ± 840

4,285 ± 1,818

19,970 ± 9,090

101,767 ± 9,753

Mean parasite ± SEM (molecules)b

114 ± 34

171 ± 73

799 ± 364

4,070 ± 390

Mean parasite corr. ± SEM (molecules)c

568 ± 168

857 ± 363

3,994 ± 1,818

20,353 ± 1,950

Coefficient of variation (%)

266

73

111

33

a Mean sample = total number of ITS2 copies for a given stage divided by the number of samples

b Mean parasite = mean sample divided by 25× parasites

c Mean parasite corr. = theoretical value of the mean parasite multiplied by five to correct for genomic DNA partitioning. Each sample contained 25× parasites

Abbreviations: n number of samples analyzed for each developmental stage, SEM standard error of the mean

Fig. 4

ITS2 copies of four developmental stages of Ostertagia ostertagi. Sample mean of ITS2 copies (molecules μl-1) illustrated on the Y-axis plotted against each developmental stage (X-axis). Error bars indicate standard error of the mean (SEM). Asterisks denote statistical significance: *** = P < 0.0001

Discussion

This study showed that anaerobic storage of O. ostertagia eggs at room temperature for up to 336 h completely inhibited any effects on morphology and qPCR semi-quantifications. The inhibited development is in agreement with previous investigations on the closely related ruminant trichostrongylid Cooperia oncophora [19] and horse strongylids [20, 21], but to our knowledge we are the first to document the efficiency of anaerobic storage in the context of an extremely sensitive molecular diagnostic pipeline. Refrigeration at aerobic conditions suppressed egg development for up to 72 h, which is also in agreement with previous findings [2224], but at room temperature a significant increase in ITS2 copies was observed already from 12 h. Our findings warrant consideration whenever faecal samples are stored prior to qPCR for quantification of species-specific parasite loads such as evaluation of drug efficiency, epidemiological research and diagnosis of parasitic infections in both animals and humans.

A substantial variation in ITS2 copies was observed in our study, even under anaerobic conditions. Some of this variation in the qPCR outcome could relate to genetic variation in the target sequence of the forward primer, which may provide suboptimal conditions for the qPCR. Indeed, a BLAST® search on the targeted ITS2 sequence (GenBank accession no: AB245021.2, query range 1,036–1,126 bp) revealed a genetic variability of 1–2 single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) in the forward primer region among 31 % of the available O. ostertagi ITS2 sequences (Additional file 2). The variation is observed in isolates of diverse geographical origin but a population genetic analysis of the ITS2 is beyond the scope of this paper.

Another possible source of variation includes inconsistent extraction efficiency of genomic DNA from eggs compared to L1. In order to ensure consistent extraction efficiency the protocol was validated prior to the study using known numbers of eggs and L1 that were subjected to various concentrations of proteinase K and incubation times. Following homogenisation, the samples were evaluated microscopically for the presence of parasite fragments, which could not be detected in any of the samples thus indicating adequate homogenisation. Finally, 2-fold variations in ribosomal copy numbers have been found in Caenorhabditis elegans propagated by repeated population bottlenecking [25]; a similar situation may have arisen in the O. ostertagi populations over time.

Ideally, more biological replicates should have been included to avoid statistical noise caused by genetic variability. Yet, addition of more replicates may have introduced another source of variation due to egg development during sample preparation. The current study design comprised 36 unique trials, distributed on four storage conditions and analysed in biological triplicates at nine time points. This resulted in a total of 108 biological samples, which were quantified in technical duplicates. Supplementary samples would have necessitated additional manpower, which would have added further variation. Moreover, it would be relevant to repeat the study with other species or genera of gastrointestinal nematodes e.g. C. oncophora to confirm the consistency of the findings. Despite the limitations of our study, the conclusions can be clearly inferred from the genetic and morphological data.

Under aerobic conditions, morphological development and a trend towards increased ITS2 copies were observed after 168 h and 336 h thus stressing the importance of quick sample turnover time even at cold storage. At 25 °C, the optimal developmental temperature of O. ostertagi (23–25 °C) [26] and other ruminant [19, 27] and equine nematodes [21], a clear and significant increase in ITS2 copies was observed already from 12–72 h. These findings justify re-evaluation of diagnostic procedures in parasitological laboratories where samples are stored under ambient aerobic conditions as part of a molecular diagnostic pipeline. Surprisingly, anaerobic storage at 4 °C was found to have a significant temporal effect on ITS2 copies (drop at 336 h), but considering the lack of morphological changes these results were probably due to intrinsic variations caused by the mentioned ITS2 variability. No significant temporal effects on ITS2 copies or morphology were observed following anaerobic storage at 25 °C. Furthermore, less molecular variation was observed at 25 °C regardless of storage period. We hypothesise that this finding is related to the microenvironment in the faeces. Warm conditions support microbial activity which in turn might reduce the presence of faecal PCR inhibitors resulting in less variation in ITS2 copies at higher temperatures. This result may have important practical consequences as transport of faecal samples from farm to laboratory is far more practical at room temperature than cold transport.

In order to create anaerobic conditions, faeces containing O. ostertagi eggs were vacuum-packed using an easily available kitchen machine. While purified O. ostertagi eggs will quickly disrupt due to pressure if they are vacuum-packed (data not shown), storage of eggs in faeces was essential to secure the integrity of the parasites and maintain a realistic evaluation of the vacuum packing strategy. Thus, faeces were only present during storage of the anaerobic samples but not during storage of aerobic samples, and therefore the outcome may potentially have been influenced by other factors such as e.g. pH and humidity rather than oxygen tension. Incorporation of an inhibition control by spiking a non-related target to the samples could confirm any presence of potential inhibitors.

In summary, we found that oxygen clearly outranks temperature in the hierarchy of bionomic requirements of O. ostertagi. This is of less importance if the aim of the analysis is purely qualitative, or if the samples to be compared have been stored identically under controlled laboratory conditions. However, field samples may be subject to a wide range of storage times and temperatures, and in such cases our results strongly advocate the use of vacuum packing as sole storage strategy for faecal samples intended for semi-quantitative molecular analysis. This is in accordance with the recommendations in the World Association for the Advancement of Veterinary Parasitology (WAAVP) guidelines [28], which now have robust evidence of the superiority of vacuum packing prior to molecular diagnostics. A disadvantage of effective vacuum packing is the requirement of electricity, which is not always at hand in field settings. In such cases, chemical preservation may be an alternative strategy [16] but validation of other common preservatives such as ethanol is still lacking. Ultimately, the strategy for creating anaerobic conditions should be as easy as possible to allow consistent and adequate routine sampling.

The first-stage larvae (L1) of O. ostertagi exhibited ~ 36 times higher copy numbers (20,353 ± 1,950) than unembryonated eggs (568 ± 168; P < 0.0001) with lower coefficient of variation (33 vs 266 %). Consequently, this parasitic stage may offer an attractive alternative for sensitive, semi-quantitative diagnostics, which is particularly relevant in cattle due to frequent low level infections [29]. The L1 larval stage can be cultivated within 24 h, with developmental efficacies of over 80 % and similar hatching rates regardless of strongylid species [3, 11].

Conclusions

Aerobic storage of O. ostertagi eggs at 25 °C led to a significant increase in ITS2 copies from 12 h due to embryonation and subsequent hatching. In contrast, anaerobic storage (vacuum packing) at 25 °C completely inhibited egg development and any undesirable semi-quantification bias for up to 336 h. Hence, vacuum packing is an optimal storage strategy prior to molecular diagnostic analyses. Alternatively, aerobic storage at 4 °C for up to 72 h can be used. Due to high copy numbers and less genetic variation, the L1 stage may be considered for diagnostics and further molecular research.

Abbreviations

ANOVA, one-way analysis of variance; AR, anthelmintic resistance; Ct, cycle threshold; DNA, deoxyribonucleic acid; dNTP, deoxyribonucleoside triphosphate; ITS2, Internal Transcribed Spacer 2; kb, Kilobases; L1, first-stage larvae; L3, third-stage larvae; MgCl2, magnesium chloride; NaCl, sodium chloride; PCR, polymerase chain reaction; qPCR, real-time semi-quantitative polymerase chain reaction; rDNA, ribosomal DNA; SEM, standard error of the mean; SNP, single nucleotide polymorphisms; U, units; WAAVP, World Association for the Advancement of Veterinary Parasitology

Declarations

Acknowledgements

Boi-Thien Thi Pham is acknowledged for skilled, technical assistance and Miguel Péna-Espinoza for assistance during calf management and worm collection.

Funding

The study was funded by the EMIDA ERA-NET program: Coping with Anthelmintic RESistance in ruminants (3405–11–0430/32).

Availability of data and material

The datasets supporting the conclusions of this article are included within the article and its additional files. Ostertagia ostertagi ITS2 sequence: GenBank accession number AB245021.2|:1,036–1,126 bp.

Authors’ contributions

MD carried out practical work, performed molecular analyses and drafted the manuscript. JH participated in molecular validation and in the design of the study. PN participated in microscopy and molecular analysis. SMT participated in the design of the study. HLE conceived the study, participated in coordination and helped to draft the manuscript. All authors contributed to the writing, read and approved the final manuscript.

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Ethics approval and consent to participate

The experiments were performed under Animal ethics permission, Journal no. 2013–15–2934–00763, issued and approved by the Danish Animal Experiments Inspectorate.

Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.

Authors’ Affiliations

(1)
Section for Parasitology and Aquatic Diseases, Department of Veterinary Disease Biology, Faculty of Health and Medical Sciences, University of Copenhagen
(2)
Section for Bacteriology, Pathology and Parasitology, National Veterinary Institute, Technical University of Denmark
(3)
Department of Biomedical Sciences and Veterinary Public Health, Section for Parasitology, Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences
(4)
Norwegian Veterinary Institute

References

  1. Charlier J, van der Voort M, Kenyon F, Skuce P, Vercruysse J. Chasing helminths and their economic impact on farmed ruminants. Trends Parasitol. 2014;30:361–7.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. Lichtenfels JR, Hoberg EP, Zarlenga DS. Systematics of gastrointestinal nematodes of domestic ruminants: advances between 1992 and 1995 and proposals for future research. Vet Parasitol. 1997;72:225–45.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. Berrie DA, East IJ, Bourne AS, Bremner KC. Differential recoveries from faecal cultures of larvae of some gastro-intestinal nematodes of cattle. J Helminthol. 1988;62:110–4.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. Hubert J, Kerboeuf D. A new method for culture of larvae used in diagnosis of ruminant gastrointestinal strongylosis: comparison with fecal cultures. Can J Comp Med. 1984;48:63.PubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  5. Dobson RJ, Barnes EH, Birclijin SD, Gill JH. The survival of Ostertagia circumcincta and Trichostrongylus colubriformis in faecal culture as a source of bias in apportioning egg counts to worm species. Int J Parasitol. 1992;22:1005–8.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. Roeber F, Kahn L. The specific diagnosis of gastrointestinal nematode infections in livestock: Larval culture technique, its limitations and alternative DNA-based approaches. Vet Parasitol. 2014;205:619–28.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. Kaplan RM, Vidyashankar AN. An inconvenient truth: global worming and anthelmintic resistance. Vet Parasitol. 2012;186:70–8.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. Harmon AF, Williams ZB, Zarlenga DS, Hildreth MB. Real-time PCR for quantifying Haemonchus contortus eggs and potential limiting factors. Parasitol Res. 2007;101:71–6.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. Learmount J, Conyers C, Hird H, Morgan C, Craig BH, von Samson-Himmelstjerna G, et al. Development and validation of real-time PCR methods for diagnosis of Teladorsagia circumcincta and Haemonchus contortus in sheep. Vet Parasitol. 2009;166:268–74.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. Siedek EM, Burden D, von Samson-Himmelstjerna G. Feasibility of genus-specific real-time PCR for the differentiation of larvae from gastrointestinal nematodes of naturally infected sheep. Berl Munch Tierarztl Wochenschr. 2005;119:303–7.Google Scholar
  11. von Samson-Himmelstjerna G, Harder A, Schnieder T. Quantitative analysis of ITS2 sequences in trichostrongyle parasites. Int J Parasitol. 2002;32:1529–35.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  12. Zarlenga DS, Chute MB, Gasbarre LC, Boyd PC. A multiplex PCR assay for differentiating economically important gastrointestinal nematodes of cattle. Vet Parasitol. 2001;97:201–11.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  13. Zarlenga DS, Hoberg EP, Stringfellow F, Lichtenfels JR. Comparisons of two polymorphic species of Ostertagia and phylogenetic relationships within the Ostertagiinae (Nematoda: Trichostrongyloidea) inferred from ribosomal DNA repeat and mitochondrial DNA sequences. J Parasitol. 1998;84:806–12.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. Zarlenga DS, Gasbarre LC, Boyd P, Leighton E, Lichtenfels JR. Identification and semi-quantitation of Ostertagia ostertagi eggs by enzymatic amplification of ITS-1 sequences. Vet Parasitol. 1998;77:245–57.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. Höglund J, Engström A, von Samson-Himmelstjerna G, Demeler J, Tydén E. Real-time PCR detection for quantification of infection levels with Ostertagia ostertagi and Cooperia oncophora in cattle faeces. Vet Parasitol. 2013;197:251–7.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. Harmon AF, Williams ZB, Holler LD, Hildreth MB. Comparison of three different preservatives for morphological and real-time PCR analyses of Haemonchus contortus eggs. Vet Parasitol. 2007;145:361–5.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. Henriksen SA, Aagaard K. A simple flotation and McMaster method. Nord Vet Med. 1975;28:392–7.Google Scholar
  18. Fox J. Getting started with the R commander: A basic-statistics graphical user interface to R. J Stat Softw. 2005;14:1–42.Google Scholar
  19. Sengupta ME, Thapa S, Thamsborg SM, Mejer H. Effect of vacuum packing and temperature on survival and hatching of strongyle eggs in faecal samples. Vet Parasitol. 2016;217:21–4.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. Craven J, Bjørn H, Barnes EH, Henriksen SA, Nansen P. A comparison of in vitro tests and a faecal egg count reduction test in detecting anthelmintic resistance in horse strongyles. Vet Parasitol. 1999;85:49–59.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. Nielsen MK, Vidyashankar AN, Andersen UV, DeLisi K, Pilegaard K, Kaplan RM. Effects of fecal collection and storage factors on strongylid egg counts in horses. Vet Parasitol. 2010;167:55–61.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. Ogbourne CP. Observations on the free-living stages of strongylid nematodes of the horse. Parasitology. 1972;64:461–77.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. Mfitilodze MW, Hutchinson GW. Development and survival of free-living stages of equine strongyles under laboratory conditions. Vet Parasitol. 1987;23:121–33.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. Rupasinghe D, Ogbourne CP. Laboratory studies on the effect of temperature on the development of the free-living stages of some strongylid nematodes of the horse. Parasitol Res. 1978;55:249–53.Google Scholar
  25. Bik HM, Fournier D, Sung W, Bergeron RD, Thomas WK. Intra-genomic variation in the ribosomal repeats of nematodes. PLoS One. 2013;8:e78230.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  26. Pandey VS. Effect of temperature on development of the free-living stages of Ostertagia ostertagi. J Parasitol. 1972;58:1037–41.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  27. Rossanigo CE, Gruner L. Moisture and temperature requirements in faeces for the development of free-living stages of gastrointestinal nematodes of sheep, cattle and deer. J Helminthol. 1995;69:357–62.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  28. Coles GC, Bauer C, Borgsteede FHM, Geerts S, Klei TR, Taylor MA, et al. World Association for the Advancement of Veterinary Parasitology (WAAVP) methods for the detection of anthelmintic resistance in nematodes of veterinary importance. Vet Parasitol. 1992;44:35–44.Google Scholar
  29. Agneessens J, Dorny P, Hollanders W, Claerebout E, Vercruysse J. Epidemiological observations on gastrointestinal nematode infections in grazing cow-calf pairs in Belgium. Vet Parasitol. 1997;69:65–75.Google Scholar

Copyright

© The Author(s). 2016

Comments

By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.

Advertisement