Open Access

Seroprevalence of bovine theileriosis in northern China

Contributed equally
Parasites & Vectors20169:591

https://doi.org/10.1186/s13071-016-1882-x

Received: 22 February 2016

Accepted: 9 November 2016

Published: 18 November 2016

Abstract

Background

Bovine theileriosis is a common disease transmitted by ticks, and can cause loss of beef and dairy cattle worldwide. Here, an indirect enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (iELISA) based on Theileria luwenshuni surface protein (TlSP) was developed and used to carry out a seroepidemiological survey of bovine theileriosis in northern China.

Methods

We used the BugBuster Ni-NTA His•Bind Purification Kit to purify recombinant TlSP (rTlSP), which was subsequently analyzed by Western Blotting to evaluate cross-reactivity with other pathogen-positive sera. The iELISA method based on rTlSP was successfully developed. Sera from 2005 blood samples were tested with the rTlSP-iELISA method, and blood smears from these samples were observed by microscopy.

Results

The specificity of iELISA was 98.9%, the sensitivity was 98.5%, and the cut-off was selected as 24.6%. Western Blot analysis of rTlSP confirmed that there were cross-reactions with Theileria luwenshuni, Theileria uilenbergi, Theileria ovis, Theileria annulata, Theileria orientalis and Theileria sinensis. The epidemiological survey showed that the highest positive rate of bovine theileriosis was 98.3%, the lowest rate was 84.1%, and the average positive rate was 95.4% by iELISA. With microscopy, the highest positive rate was 38.9%, the lowest rate was 5.1%, and the relative average positive rate was 13.7%.

Conclusions

An rTlSP-iELISA was developed to detect circulating antibodies against bovine Theileria in northern China. This is the first report on the seroprevalence of bovine theileriosis in northern China, and it also provides seroepidemiological data on bovine theileriosis in China.

Keywords

ELISA Microscopy Prevalence Theileriosis

Background

Bovine theileriosis is a constraint to the cattle industry in many developing countries because it causes morbidity and mortality in calves and exotic cattle [13]. Generally, indigenous cattle have developed resistance to ticks and tick-borne pathogens in endemic areas. However, the susceptibility of exotic breeds presents a major obstacle to the improvement of cattle production and breeding [4]. The causative agents of bovine theileriosis reported in China are Theileria annulata, Theileria orientalis and Theileria sinensis [3, 57]. Five kinds of ticks, namely, Hyalomma detritum, Hyalomma anatolicum anatolicum, Haemaphysalis longicornis, Haemaphysalis qinghaiensis and Haemaphysalis japonica, can transmit ovine and bovine Theileria infection in China [8]. Of them, Hya. detritum and Hya. anatolicum anatolicum can transmit T. annulata [9], and Hya. anatolicum anatolicum can also transmit Theileria ovis [10]; Haem. longicornis and Haem. qinghaiensis can transmit Theileria luwenshuni and Theileria uilenbergi; Haem. longicornis can also transmit T. orientalis; and T. sinensis can be transmitted by Haem. qinghaiensis and Haem. japonica [6, 11, 12]. The geographical distribution of tick species linked to ovine and bovine Theileria spp. in China is listed in Fig. 1.
Fig. 1

Geographical distribution of various kinds of ticks related to bovine and ovine Theileria spp. in China

In the early phase, bovine theileriosis can be diagnosed based on observing ticks feeding on cattle, superficial lymph node enlargement, Theileria schizonts in lymphocytes with microscopic examination, and other clinical symptoms [3, 9]. Subsequently, Theileria parasites can be detected and identified in animals and ticks by polymerase chain reaction (PCR) [13, 14], reverse line blot (RLB) hybridization assay [15, 16], and loop-mediated isothermal amplification (LAMP) [17, 18]. Serodiagnosis of bovine theileriosis is performed by an indirect fluorescent antibody test (IFAT) [1921]. Some enzyme-linked immunosorbent assays (ELISAs) to detect circulating antibodies against T. annulata were developed based on recombinant protein T. annulata surface protein (TaSP) or Tams1 [2224]. At present, the ELISA method is widely applied as a cheap, fast and high-throughput method to screen and diagnose large numbers of clinical and field specimens.

T. luwenshuni surface protein (TlSP) is a transmembrane protein that contains eight antigen peptides [2123]. It shows that TlSP owns some candidate epitopes. TlSP shares a high similarity with TaSP [2527]. TaSP is identified as an immunodominant antigen, and it successfully used to develop and to validate a recombinant-protein-based ELISA for detecting the circulating antibodies of T. annulata-infected animals [22, 23, 28]. So, we concluded that we could use recombinant TlSP (rTlSP) as a diagnostic antigen in the ELISA. At present, serological epidemiological data about bovine theileriosis are deficient because of a lack of commercial or mature ELISA kits in China. Therefore, the objectives of this study were to develop an iELISA based on rTlSP, and to perform a prevalence study of bovine theileriosis with the iELISA and microscopic examination in northern China.

Methods

Preparation of recombinant TlSP

The functional fragment gene of TlSP was obtained from the merozoites cDNA library of T. luwenshuni using primers TlSP-F (5′-GGA ATT CGA TCG ACA ACG GAA TCC T-3′) and TlSP-R (5′-CCA AGC TTT AAC CCG TCA GAG TCA T-3′) [25]. The TlSP gene was inserted and expressed in the pET30a vector. The expression of rTlSP was verified by Western Blotting using anti-histidine antibody, and rTlSP was purified using the BugBuster Ni-NTA His•Bind Purification Kit (Invitrogen, Carlsbad, CA, USA).

Western blotting

rTlSP was separated using 12% SDS-PAGE under reducing conditions and transferred to nitrocellulose membranes of 0.45 mm pore size (Amersham, Piscataway, USA). The nitrocellulose membranes were cut into 0.25 cm wide strips and blocked with 0.1 M phosphate-buffered saline (pH 7.6) containing 5% skimmed milk powder and 0.1% Tween 20 (PBST) at 37 °C for 1 h. A total of 12 different pathogen-positive sera (T. luwenshuni, T. uilenbergi, T. ovis, T. annulata, T. orientalis, T. sinensis, Babesia bovis, B. major, B. bigemina, Anaplasma marginale, Brucella abortus, and Bovine epizootic fever virus) were used to check the antigenicity of rTlSP. Antisera were diluted 1:100 and the secondary antibody (Anti-Bovine IgG; Sigma, St Louis, MO, USA) was diluted 1:20,000 in PBST. After three washes with PBST, positive signals were revealed by 5-bromo-4-chloro-3-indolyl phosphate/nitro blue tetrazolium (BCIP/NBT) liquid substrate system (KPL, Gaithersburg, MD, USA) for 2 min.

Sera

Ninety-two negative sera (negative control) were collected from Chinese Holstein cattle at Lanzhou Dairy Farm, which is located in Lanzhou City, and neither ticks nor bovine theileriosis have been detected in the region for many years. Meanwhile, the whole blood samples with anticoagulant were collected and their smears were prepared. Ninety-two blood smears were negative by microscopic examination (ME); their relative sera were also negative by IFAT; and genomic DNA from 92 blood samples was negative by PCR [29]. As the 736 positive sera by IFAT (including 90 positive sera only by IFAT, and 646 positive sera by IFAT, PCR and ME), they were randomly picked from samples which were collected from local cattle in Xinjiang, an epidemic area of bovine theileriosis. Positive (n = 736) and negative (n = 92) sera were used in the next methods. The mixture of all positive sera was used as the positive control and the mixture of all negative sera was used as the negative control in the ELISA.

There are an estimated 30 million cattle in the study region [30]. The number of samples was calculated and collected according to twenty percent of the cattle population in selected sites, where the blood samples were permitted to be collected. A total of 2005 blood samples (including sera and whole blood with anticoagulant) were collected in 2011, 2012 and 2013 from 11 different provinces of northern China (Fig. 2): Xinjiang, Tibet, Qinghai, Gansu, Inner Mongolia, Shaanxi, Hebei, Henan, Shandong, Jilin, and Liaoning, most of which are epidemic areas for bovine theileriosis. The blood smears were prepared from peripheral blood and examined by microscopy. All of the serum samples were prepared and detected with iELISA, and the genomic DNA of all whole blood samples was extracted and detected by molecular methods. All sera were divided into five equal parts. These sera and their relative genomic DNA were preserved at −20 °C until utilizing them at Lanzhou Veterinary Research Institute.
Fig. 2

Western blotting of rTlSP. Lane M: prestained markers; Lane 1: T. luwenshuni; Lane 2: T. uilenbergi; Lane 3: T. ovis; Lane 4: T. annulata; Lane 5: T. orientalis; Lane 6: T. sinensis; Lane 7: B. bovis; Lane 8: B. major; Lane 9: B. bigemina; Lane 10: A. marginale; Lane 11: Br. abortus; Lane 12: Bovine epizootic fever virus; Lane 13: PBS

Development of ELISA and detection of samples

A previously described ELISA protocol [31] was performed with some modifications. Briefly, 96-well microplates (Nunc, Roskilde, Denmark) were coated with 100 μl/well rTlSP (5 μg/ml) in a coating buffer (0.1 M carbonate–bicarbonate buffer, pH 9.6) at 4 °C overnight. After incubation with a blocking solution (2% gelatin in PBST), the samples, blanks (PBST), standard positive and negative controls (diluted 1:100 in PBST) were distributed in duplicate. The plate was incubated with a peroxidase conjugate of monoclonal anti-bovine horseradish peroxidase IgG (Sigma, St Louis, MO, USA) (diluted 1:20,000 in PBST) at 37 °C for 1 h. After a washing step, 50 μl of O-Phenylenediamine (OPD) (Sigma Aldrich, St Louis, MO, USA) was added to each well and incubated at room temperature for 10 min. The reaction was stopped by adding 50 μl/well of 2 M H2SO4. The optical density (OD) was measured with an ELISA reader (Microplate reader Model 680, Bio-Rad, Hercules, USA) at a wavelength of 490 nm. The results are expressed as the percentage of the specific mean antibody rate (AbR%), determined using the formula: AbR% = (Sample mean OD - Negative control mean OD)/(Positive control mean OD - Negative control mean OD) × 100%. All sera samples were measured by ELISA.

Detection of samples by microscopic examination

Thin blood smears were prepared from peripheral blood of cattle. The smears were air-dried, fixed in methanol, stained with a 10% solution of Giemsa in PBS (pH 7.2), and then subjected to microscopic analysis. One hundred fields per slide were searched for the presence of Theileria piroplasms.

Results

Cross-reactivity with hemoparasite sera

The weight of recombinant TlSP was ~38 kDa. Western blotting of rTlSP confirmed that there was specific recognition of the recombinant antigen rTlSP by the positive sera of T. luwenshuni, T. uilenbergi, T. ovis, T. annulata, T. orientalis and T. sinensis; but there was no specific recognition of rTlSP with the positive sera of B. bovis, B. bigemina, B. major, A. marginale, Br. abortus and Bovine epizootic fever virus (Fig. 2).

Cut-off, sensitivity and specificity of iELISA

The cut-off, sensitivity and specificity were determined by 736 positive sera and 92 negative sera. The AbR% was calculated for each serum sample, then the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) plots (including area under the curve; AUC), cut-off and Youden’s index were evaluated with MedCalc statistical software (www.medcalc.org). Finally, the cut-off was determined to be 24.6%, corresponding to 98.9% specificity (95% confidence interval [CI]: 94.1–100%) and 98.5% sensitivity (95% CI: 97.3–99.3%) (Fig. 3); AUC 0.996, and the Youden index J 0.9742 (Table 1).
Fig. 3

Evaluation of the positive threshold value using mean AbR of negative and positive sera (0 = negative sera; 1 = positive sera)

Table 1

Area under the ROC curve (AUC) and Youden index of negative sera and positive sera

Parameter

Value

Area under the ROC curve (AUC)

0.996

Standard Error

0.00214

95% Confidence Interval

0.989–0.999

Z statistic

232.120

Significance level P (Area = 0.5)

< 0.0001

Youden index J

0.9742

Associated criterion

> 0.2460

Serological epidemiology

The prevalence of bovine theileriosis in 11 provinces is listed in Table 2 with ELISA and microscopic examination. The epidemiology results showed that the average sera-positive rate of bovine theileriosis was 95.4% by ELISA, the highest rate was 98.3% in Xinjiang Province, and the lowest rate was 84.1% in Qinhai Province. The highest prevalence was 38.9% in Shannxi Province by microscopic examination, the lowest was 5.1% in Tibet Province, and the average was 13.7%.
Table 2

Prevalence of bovine theileriosis in cattle in northern China determined by iELISA and microscopic examination

Province

No. of samples

No. of positive sera by ELISA

Percentage of positive sera (%)

Percentage of positive blood smears (%)

Xinjiang

180

177

98.3

30.0

Gansu

584

527

90.2

7.0

Liaoning

111

109

98.2

27.0

Jilin

25

24

96.0

12.0

Shaanxi

54

53

98.1

38.9

Qinghai

270

227

84.1

18.1

Inner Mongolia

316

301

98.1

10.0

Hebei

30

29

96.6

13.3

Henan

60

57

95.0

30.0

Tibet

315

309

98.1

5.1

Shandong

60

58

96.6

10.0

Total

2005

1871

  

Average

  

95.4

13.7

Discussion

Serological surveillance of bovine theileriosis has been conducted in many countries [19, 20, 2224, 3235]. However, there is no previous report from China because of the lack of domestic commercial or mature ELISA kits that can detect bovine Theileria antibodies. In addition, the foreign ELISA kits are more expensive. Compared to other methods, the advantages of ELISA are that they are less laborious and easier to perform, and a large number of samples can be detected and screened in a short time. In addition, compared to ELISA using crude antigens (such as whole parasite antigens), recombinant-protein-based ELISAs reduce false results. Serological assays are more suitable for diagnosis in the mid and late phase of theileriosis and in carrier animals (e.g. cattle, buffalo and yaks) in which the antibody titers against Theileria parasites are usually higher but the piroplasm parasitemia maybe drop to undetectable levels with microscopic examination [22].

The ELISA based on rTlSP has proven to be a highly specific and sensitive assay for detecting the circulating antibodies against Theileria spp. in China. Three bovine Theileria spp. have been reported in China [3, 5, 6, 12], and their specific positive sera against each pathogen were analyzed with Western Blotting and ELISA in this study; all of them cross-reacted with rTlSP. As a comparison, there was no cross-reactivity between rTlSP and positive sera of B. bovis, B. major, B. bigemina, A. marginale, Br. abortus and Bovine epizootic fever virus in Western Blotting.

We chose 736 positive samples to calculate the sensitivity and specificity accurately. They included the strong positive samples (646 positive sera by IFAT, PCR and ME) and the faint positives samples (90 positive sera only by IFAT). The employ of weak positive specimen makes the cut-off value to be reasonable and can avoid false negative results.

The cut-off value resulting in both maximal sensitivity and specificity was determined by two-graph ROC analysis, ROC plots efficiency, Youden’s index and likelihood ratios [36]. The data showed that the AUC was 0.996 in ROC plots, which demonstrated the accuracy of the index. The test was reliable, and the indexes are the best performance because the area is closer to 1 [37]. Moreover, AUC is a quantitative, descriptive expression of how close the ROC curve is to the perfect one (AUC = 1.0) [38]. Youden index J was 0.9742, which indicated that, unusually, there were neither false-positive nor false-negative results from the test [39]. Compared with the positive rate with microscopy, which was <40% at the highest, iELISA based on rTlSP is suitable for detecting antibodies against bovine Theileria spp. Therefore, the method can estimate whether the local cattle had been infected by Theileria spp. before the cattle were detected. It remains to be detected by blood smears and molecular methods, such as PCR, RLB and LAMP, to diagnose whether the cattle are infected by Theileria spp. After the cattle infected with Theileria parasites recovered, most remained in a state of low parasitemia or carrier state for 3–6 months (data unpublished). Investigation of bovine theileriosis is of veterinary significance.

The epidemiological survey indicated that all the provinces investigated had a high positive rate from 84.1 to 98.3% with iELISA. In comparison, the positive rate was 5.1–38.9% by microscopic examination. Microscopic examination can diagnose Theileria parasites in the early and middle phase of theileriosis, whereas, in the later phase and carrier state, parasitemia tends to a low level so that Theileria can not be detected by microscopic examination. For example, in Tibet, the positive rate was 5.1% by microscopic examination, but up to 98.1% by ELISA.

Conclusions

The epidemiological data showed that bovine theileriosis was widespread in northern China. Therefore, some efficient measures should be implemented for calves and exotic cattle in northern China.

Abbreviations

BCIP/NBT: 

5-bromo-4-chloro-3-indolyl phosphate/nitro blue tetrazolium

CI: 

Confidence interval

iELISA: 

Indirect enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay

IFAT: 

Indirect fluorescent antibody test

OD: 

Optical density

OPD: 

O-Phenylenediamine

PBST: 

Phosphate-buffered saline (PBS) containing 0.1 % Tween 20

ROC: 

Receiver operating characteristic

rTlSP: 

Recombinant TlSP

TlSP: 

Theileria luwenshuni surface protein

Declarations

Acknowledgments

We thank International Science Editing for help with modifying the paper.

Funding

This study was financially supported by the NSFC (Nos. 31272556, 31372432, 31101621, 31201899), NBCIS (CARS-38), ASTIP, FRIP (2014ZL010), CAAS, Creative Research Groups of Gansu Province (No. 1210RJIA006), ‘948’(2014-S05), Special Fund for Agro-scientific Research in the Public Research (Nos. 201303035, 201303037), MOA; 973 Program (2010CB530206), Basic Research program (CRP No. 16198/R0), Supporting Program (2013BAD12B03, 2013BAD12B05), Specific Fund for Sino-Europe Cooperation, MOST, China, State Key Laboratory of Veterinary Etiological Biology Project. The research was also facilitated by CRP No. 16198/R0 IAEA, and PIROVAC (KBBE-3-245145) of the European Commission.

Availability of data and material

The dataset supporting the conclusions of this article is included within the article.

Authors’ contributions

LYa and LYo conceived the study and all authors participated in its design and coordinated the experiments. LYa, LQ and YJ performed the Western Blotting. LYa and LQ developed the protocol for the iELISA. YJ, GP and LJ collected the serum samples. LG and GG processed the serum samples. LYo, LZ and YH performed the microscopic examination. All authors have read and approved the final manuscript.

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Ethics approval and consent to participate

This study was approved by the Animal Ethics Committee, Lanzhou Veterinary Research Institute, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences. All cattle were handled in accordance with good animal practices required by the Animal Ethics Procedures and Guidelines of the People’s Republic of China.

Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.

Authors’ Affiliations

(1)
State Key Laboratory of Veterinary Etiological Biology, Key Laboratory of Veterinary Parasitology of Gansu Province, Lanzhou Veterinary Research Institute, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Science
(2)
Jiangsu Co-innovation Center for Prevention and Control of Important Animal Infectious Diseases and Zoonoses

References

  1. Simuunza M, Weir W, Courcier E, Tait A, Shiels B. Epidemiological analysis of tick-borne diseases in Zambia. Vet Parasitol. 2011;175:331–42.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. Aktas M, Dumanli N, Angin M. Cattle infestation by Hyalomma ticks and prevalence of Theileria in Hyalomma species in the east of Turkey. Vet Parasitol. 2004;119(1):1–8.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. Luo J, Lu W. Cattle theileriosis in China. Trop Anim Health Prod. 1997;29(4 Suppl):4S–7S.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. Marcelino I, de Almeida AM, Ventosa M, Pruneau L, Meyer DF, Martinez D, et al. Tick-borne diseases in cattle: applications of proteomics to develop new generation vaccines. J Proteomics. 2012;75:4232–50.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. Bai Q, Liu G, Hen G. An unidentified species of Theileria infective for cattle discovered in China. Trop Anim Health Prod. 1997;29:43S–7S.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. Bai Q, Liu GY, Yin H, Zhao QZ, Liu DK, Ren JX, et al. Theileria sinensis sp nov: a new species of Bovine Theileria—classical taxonomic studies. Acta Veterinaria et Zootechnica Sinica. 2002;33:73–7 (in Chinese).Google Scholar
  7. Yin H, Guan GQ, Ma ML, Luo JX, Lu BY, Yuan GL, et al. Haemaphysalis qinghaiensis ticks transmit at least two different Theileria species: one is infective to yaks, one is infective to sheep. Vet Parasitol. 2002;107:29–35.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. Teng KF, Jiang ZJ. Economic insect fauna of China. Fasc 39, Acari: Ixodidae. Bejing: Science Press; 1991. p. 158–81.Google Scholar
  9. Yin H, Luo JX, Lu WS. Control of tropical theileriosis with attenuated schizont vaccine in China. Vaccine. 2008;26 Suppl 6:G11–3.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. Li Y, Guan G, Liu A, Peng Y, Luo J, Yin H. Experimental transmission of Theileria ovis by Hyalomma anatolicum anatolicum. Parasitol Res. 2010;106(4):991–4.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. Li Y, Luo J, Guan G, Ma M, Liu A, Liu J, et al. Experimental transmission of Theileria uilenbergi infective for small ruminants by Haemaphysalis longicornis and Haemaphysalis qinghaiensis. Parasitol Res. 2009;104(5):1227–31.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. Yin H, Luo J, Schnittger L, Lu B, Beyer D, Ma M, et al. Phylogenetic analysis of Theileria species transmitted by Haemaphysalis qinghaiensis. Parasitol Res. 2004;92(1):36–42.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. d’Oliveira C, van der Weide M, Habela MA, Jacquiet P, Jongejan F. Detection of Theileria annulata in blood samples of carrier cattle by PCR. J Clin Microbiol. 1995;33:2665–9.PubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  14. Aktas M, Dumanli N, Cetinkaya B, Cakmak A. Field evaluation of PCR in detecting Theileria annulata infection in cattle in eastern Turkey. Vet Rec. 2002;150(17):548–9.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. Schnittger L, Yin H, Bai Q, Gubbels MJ, Beyer D, Niemann S, et al. Simultaneous detection and differentiation of Theileria and Babesia parasites infecting small ruminants by reverse line blotting. Parasitol Res. 2004;2:189–96.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  16. Altay K, Aydin MF, Dumanli N, Aktas M. Molecular detection of Theileria and Babesia infections in cattle. Vet Parasitol. 2008;158(4):295–301.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. Liu AH, Guan GQ, Du PF, Liu ZJ, Gou HT, Liu JL, et al. Loop-mediated isothermal amplification (LAMP) assays for the detection of Theileria annulata infection in China targeting the 18S rRNA and ITS sequences. Exp Parasitol. 2012;131:125–9.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. Liu AH, Guan GQ, Du PF, Gou HT, Liu ZJ, Liu JL, et al. Rapid identification and differentiation of Theileria sergenti and Theileria sinensis using a loop-mediated isothermal amplification (LAMP) assay. Vet Parasitol. 2013;191:15–22.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. Burridge MJ, Kimber CD. The indirect fluorescent antibody test for experimental East Coast fever (Theileria parva infection of cattle). Evaluation of a cell culture schizont antigen. Res Vet Sci. 1972;13(5):451–5.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. Kimber CD, Burridge MJ. The indirect fluorescent antibody test for experimental East Coast fever (Theileria parva infection of cattle). Evaluation of dried blood samples as a source of antibody. Res Vet Sci. 1972;13(2):133–5.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. OIE. Manual of diagnostic tests and vaccines for terrestrial animals, vol. 1–2. 7th ed. Paris: Office International Des Epizooties; 2014.Google Scholar
  22. Bakheit MA, Schnittger L, Salih DA, Boguslawski K, Beyer D, Fadl M, et al. Application of the recombinant Theileria annulata surface protein in an in indirect ELISA for the diagnosis of tropical theileriosis. Parasitol Res. 2004;92:299–302.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. Seitzer U, Bakheit MA, Salih DE, Ali A, Haller D, Yin H, et al. From molecule to diagnostic tool: Theileria annulata surface protein TaSP. Parasitol Res. 2007;101:S217–23.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. Rajendran C, Ray DD. Diagnosis of tropical bovine theileriosis by ELISA with recombinant merozoite surface protein of Theileria annulata (Tams1). J Parasit Dis. 2014;38:41–5.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  25. He H, Li Y, Liu Z, Yang J, Chen Z, Luo J, et al. Cloning and Prokaryotic expression of TlSP gene of Theileria luwenshuni. Chin Vet Sci. 2012;42:1139–43 (in Chinese).Google Scholar
  26. Li Y, Liu Z, Chen Z, Liu J, Yang J, He H, et al. An ELISA method for detection of ovine and caprine theileriosis. Patent. 2015. Patent Number: ZL20121012339.8Google Scholar
  27. He H, Li Y, Liu J, Liu Z, Yang J, Liu A, et al. An indirect ELISA for detection of Theileria spp. antibodies using a recombinant protein (rTlSP) from Theileria luwenshuni. Exp Parasitol. 2016;166:89–93.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  28. Renneker S, Kullmann B, Gerber S, Dobschanski J, Bakheit MA, Geysen D, et al. Development of a competitive ELISA for detection of Theileria annulata infection. Transbound Emerg Dis. 2008;55:249–56.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  29. Allsopp BA, Baylis HA, Allsopp MT, Cavalier-Smith T, Bishop RP, Carrington DM, et al. Discrimination between six species of Theileria using oligonucleotide probes which detect small subunit ribosomal RNA sequences. Parasitology. 1993;107:157–65.Google Scholar
  30. Cao BH. China bull map (the Second Edition). Yak beef cattle industry technology research and development center. 2011; Censor code: GS (2008,1361)Google Scholar
  31. Guan GQ, Chauvin A, Rogniaux H, Luo JX, Yin H, Moreau E. Merozoite proteins from Babesia sp. BQ1 (Lintan) as potential antigens for serodiagnosis by ELISA. Parasitol. 2010;137:927–38.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  32. Gubbels MJ, d’Oliveira C, Jongejan F. Development of an indirect Tams1 enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay for diagnosis of Theileria annulata infection in cattle. Clin Diagn Lab Immunol. 2000;7:404–11.PubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  33. Renneker S, Abdo J, Ahmed JS, Seitzer U. Field validation of a competitive ELISA for detection of Theileria annulata infection. Parasitol Res. 2009;106(1):47–53.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  34. Billiouw M, Brandt J, Vercruysse J, Speybroeck N, Marcotty T, Mulumba M, et al. Evaluation of the indirect fluorescent antibody test as a diagnostic tool for East Coast fever in eastern Zambia. Vet Parasitol. 2005;127(3–4):189–98.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  35. Yin H, Lu W, Luo J. Babesiosis in China. Trop Anim Health Prod. 1997;29:11S–5S.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  36. Greiner M, Sohr D, Goble P. A modified ROC analysis for the selection of cut-off values and the definition of intermediate results of serodiagnostic test. J Immunol Methods. 1995;185:123–32.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  37. Mboloi MM, Bekker CP, Kruitwagen C, Greiner M, Jongejan F. Validation of the indirect MAP1-B enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay for diagnosis of experimental Cowdria ruminantium infection in small ruminants. Clin Diagn Lab Immunol. 1999;6:66–72.PubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  38. Greiner M. Two-graph receiver operating characteristic (TG-ROC): a Microsoft-EXCLE template for the selection of cut-off values in diagnostic test. J Immunol Methods. 1995;185:145–6.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  39. Youden WJ. Index for rating diagnostic tests. Cancer. 1950;3:32–5.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright

© The Author(s). 2016

Comments

By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.

Advertisement