Open Access

Genome scaffolding and annotation for the pathogen vector Ixodes ricinus by ultra-long single molecule sequencing

  • Wibke J. Cramaro1,
  • Oliver E. Hunewald1,
  • Lesley Bell-Sakyi2 and
  • Claude P. Muller1Email author
Parasites & Vectors201710:71

https://doi.org/10.1186/s13071-017-2008-9

Received: 9 August 2016

Accepted: 1 February 2017

Published: 8 February 2017

Abstract

Background

Global warming and other ecological changes have facilitated the expansion of Ixodes ricinus tick populations. Ixodes ricinus is the most important carrier of vector-borne pathogens in Europe, transmitting viruses, protozoa and bacteria, in particular Borrelia burgdorferi (sensu lato), the causative agent of Lyme borreliosis, the most prevalent vector-borne disease in humans in the Northern hemisphere. To faster control this disease vector, a better understanding of the I. ricinus tick is necessary. To facilitate such studies, we recently published the first reference genome of this highly prevalent pathogen vector. Here, we further extend these studies by scaffolding and annotating the first reference genome by using ultra-long sequencing reads from third generation single molecule sequencing. In addition, we present the first genome size estimation for I. ricinus ticks and the embryo-derived cell line IRE/CTVM19.

Results

235,953 contigs were integrated into 204,904 scaffolds, extending the currently known genome lengths by more than 30% from 393 to 516 Mb and the N50 contig value by 87% from 1643 bp to a N50 scaffold value of 3067 bp. In addition, 25,263 sequences were annotated by comparison to the tick’s North American relative Ixodes scapularis. After (conserved) hypothetical proteins, zinc finger proteins, secreted proteins and P450 coding proteins were the most prevalent protein categories annotated. Interestingly, more than 50% of the amino acid sequences matching the homology threshold had 95–100% identity to the corresponding I. scapularis gene models. The sequence information was complemented by the first genome size estimation for this species. Flow cytometry-based genome size analysis revealed a haploid genome size of 2.65Gb for I. ricinus ticks and 3.80 Gb for the cell line.

Conclusions

We present a first draft sequence map of the I. ricinus genome based on a PacBio-Illumina assembly. The I. ricinus genome was shown to be 26% (500 Mb) larger than the genome of its American relative I. scapularis. Based on the genome size of 2.65 Gb we estimated that we covered about 67% of the non-repetitive sequences. Genome annotation will facilitate screening for specific molecular pathways in I. ricinus cells and provides an overview of characteristics and functions.

Keywords

Ixodes ricinus GenomeAnnotationHaploid genome size estimationSingle molecule real time sequencingFlow cytometryTickTick cell line

Background

Ixodes ricinus is the most important European arthropod vector of human and animal pathogens and the most common tick species in Europe [1, 2]. It transmits a wide range of pathogens including bacteria, e.g. Borrelia burgdorferi (sensu lato), Anaplasma spp., Rickettsia spp.; viruses, e.g. tick-borne encephalitis virus; and protozoans, e.g. Babesia spp. The prevalence of ticks is on the rise throughout Europe due to environmental changes including climate [3, 4], forestry and wildlife management (e.g. increasing deer populations) [57]. Today, I. ricinus is found at higher latitudes and altitudes than just a few decades ago [810]. Moreover, longer questing activity periods have been reported [11]. In addition to deciduous and mixed forests and meadows, I. ricinus is also increasingly found in urban parks, recreational areas, private gardens and cemeteries [12, 13]. Epidemiological studies revealed that these urban tick populations are infected with tick-borne pathogens, such as B.burgdorferi (s.l.) (up to 18%), Babesia spp. (up to 3%), Rickettsia spp. (up to 8%), Anaplasma spp. (up to 16%) and Ehrlichia spp. (up to 16%) [1418]. Therefore, I. ricinus ticks represent a considerable hazard not only for specific risk groups such as foresters, agricultural workers and livestock, but also for the general population and companion animals. To develop mitigation strategies against expanding tick populations and to reduce the risk of tick-borne infections, a better understanding of the I. ricinus tick and its genome is crucial. Genome coding sequences pave the way for comprehensive proteomic and transcriptomic studies. Publicly available reference genomes facilitate research in many ways including tick-host and tick-pathogen interactions and tick phylogenetics. Ticks may even be a resource for new pharmaceuticals such as e.g. anti-hemostatic agents [19] or complement inhibitors [20]. Homology analyses and genome annotation warrant functional analyses, potentially revealing new pharmaceutical targets for acaricide development and putative vaccine candidates. Despite the high prevalence of the I. ricinus tick in Europe and the scientific potential of a fully annotated genome, the first reference genome for this species was only recently published [21]. Here we further extend these studies by presenting a scaffold of the genome of the most important pathogen vector in Europe. The sequence information is complemented by the first genome size estimation for this tick species obtained by flow cytometry.

Results

Genome size estimation

The genome size of I. ricinus was estimated from tick cells of different origins including adult males and females of two laboratory colonies from Germany and Ireland as well as field ticks collected in Luxembourg. In addition, cells from the embryo-derived I. ricinus cell line IRE/CTVM19 were included. Cellular DNA was stained with propidium iodide (PI) and analyzed by flow cytometry. Chicken red blood cells (CRBCs) and the human tetraploid T cell line 1301 were used as internal standards (Fig. 1).
Fig. 1

Genome size estimation for I. ricinus tick cells by flow cytometry. Cellular DNA was quantitatively stained with propidium iodide (PI). Chicken red blood cells (CRBCs) were stained with CFSE and 1301 tetraploid T cells (1301) with BV421 coupled CD45-antibody. Fluorescence was analyzed for Ixodes ricinus nuclei (blue; a) and IRE/CTVM19 cells (blue; b) as well as CRBCs (green; a, b) and 1301 cells (red; a, b). Abbreviation: AFU, artificial fluorescence units. Graphs are representative of 3 independent biological replicates per sample

The genome size was calculated for each sample in direct comparison with the diploid CRBC standard and the tetraploid 1301 cell line standard and results were merged. The average size of the haploid genome of the I. ricinus strains analyzed was 2.72 Gb for females and 2.57 Gb for males. The overall average haploid genome size of both genders was 2.65 Gb. The genome size of the males was in all cases approximately 95% of the genome size of their female counterparts. Among the different strains analyzed, the laboratory colony from Germany had the largest genomes with 2.79 Gb for females and 2.64 Gb for males, while the laboratory colony from Ireland (2.67 Gb for females, 2.53 Gb for males) had the smallest genomes. The genome sizes of the ticks collected in Luxembourg were intermediate (2.69 Gb for females, 2.55 Gb for males). The genome of the IRE/CTVM19 cell line was, at 3.80 Gb, about 1.4 fold larger than the size of the average tick genome (Fig. 2). The genomes of the various ticks were not significantly different from each other, but the genome of the IRE/CTVM19 cells line was significantly larger (P < 0.001).
Fig. 2

Genome size estimates for Ixodes ricinus tick cells from different origins by flow cytometry. The genome sizes of laboratory colony ticks from Insect Services (Germany) and Charles River (Ireland), field-collected ticks from Luxembourg as well as the I. ricinus embryo-derived cell line IRE/CTVM19 were analyzed by propidium iodide staining and flow cytometry. Error bars correspond to the standard deviation from 3 independent biological replicates

Genome scaffolding

Genomic DNA from male I. ricinus ticks was sequenced with the PacBio RS system. This third generation SMRT sequencing technique generated 5,624,511 ultra-long genomic reads containing 11,843,540,746 bp. This corresponds to a 4.5-fold sequencing coverage of the I. ricinus genome with an average size of 2.65 Gb as described above. These sequences were combined with the sequences from the first I. ricinus reference genome based on an Illumina shotgun sequencing approach and described recently by our group [21].

The PacBio reads were mapped against the assembled contigs as a reference. PacBio reads spanning several contigs as well as reads spanning gaps or aligning into gaps, were identified and further analyzed. Thus, 5,584,233 PacBio reads (99%) were mapped to extend and scaffold the reference contigs and fill the gaps. As a result, 235,953 contigs were integrated into 204,904 scaffolds. The total genome lengths spanned was extended from 393 to 516 Mb, which represents 19.4% of the I. ricinus 2.65 Gbp haploid genome. A comparison of the new scaffolds with the original reference contigs is shown in Table 1.
Table 1

Comparison of the created scaffolds to the original reference contigs

 

Contigs

Scaffolds

Number of sequences

235,953

204,904

N50 (bp)

1643

3067

Longest sequence (bp)

32,538

38,109

Total lengths spanned (bp)

392,924,918

515,788,051

A gap was defined as a stretch of at least 25 unknown nucleotides. Six hundred and forty-eightof the 204,904 scaffolds (0.3%) contain gaps resulting from low quality base calling in these positions. The longest gap is 141 bp in length, the mean gap length is 57 bp. In total, 37,176 nucleotides of the 515,788,501 bp (0.007%) are unknown.

This Whole Genome Shotgun project has been deposited at DDBJ/ENA/GenBank under the accession JXMZ00000000. The version described in this paper is version JXMZ02000000.

Genome annotation

Genomics scaffolds were blasted against the annotated proteins of the closest related species, I. scapularis [22]. A total of 25,263 blast results matched the significance criteria of at least 80% amino acid identity and a maximum e-value of 1.0e-5. A detailed table of the results including query, hit description, e-value and identity is shown in Additional file 1: Dataset S1. More than 50% of sequences, matching the significance criteria in the blast search described above, reached 95–100% identity with I. scapularis sequences (Additional file 2: Figure S1). The annotations of the matching blast hits were reassigned to the I. ricinus scaffolds. The frequency of the annotations was counted and is presented in Additional file 3: Dataset S2. Figure 3 shows the most frequently annotated proteins by categories. Hypothetical and conserved hypothetical proteins were the largest groups of annotated proteins. The largest annotated category was zinc finger proteins, followed by secreted proteins and cytochrome P450 coding proteins. No significant shift in the distribution of the most abundant annotations was observed compared to the previous genome version JXMZ01000000.
Fig. 3

Most prevalent protein categories annotated in the Ixodes ricinus genome. Annotations were based on homology to annotated I. scapularis proteins. Annotative categories with at least 50 assigned sequences are shown. The number of assigned sequences is given in brackets. The most abundant hits were hypothetical protein (21% of total) and conserved hypothetical protein (13% of total), which were not included into the graph as they do not contain annotative information. A table detailing all annotations and their frequency is provided as Additional file 3

Discussion

By flow cytometry of PI-stained nuclei, we estimated that the haploid genome size of I. ricinus was on average 2.65 Gb. There were no significant differences in genome sizes observed between the laboratory ticks and the field ticks. Also, the genomes of I. ricinus ticks from different geographic origins in Europe were the same size. The genomes of the male I. ricinus ticks were in all cases only 95% of the size of their female counterparts (average male genome: 2.57 Gb; average female genome 2.72 Gb). As I. ricinus ticks were shown to have an XY sex determination system, this difference likely reflects the amount of DNA distributed on the X and Y chromosomes [2325]. Despite a diploid set of the same number of chromosomes [2325], the genome of I. ricinus is 0.5 Gb, or 26%, larger than that of its North American relative I. scapularis, which is estimated at 2.1 Gb based both on reassociation kinetics and genome sequencing [26]. Similarly, the I. ricinus genome is 0.6 Gb, or 33%, larger than the I. pacificus genome size estimated by flow cytometry [27]. This is compatible with previous observations of large differences in genome size between species of arthropods in general and ticks in particular.

The genome of the embryo-derived I. ricinus cell line IRE/CTVM19 (3.80 Gb) was about 1.4 times the size of the genome of the I. ricinus ticks. Multiplication of repeats or insertion of transposable elements across the genome may be more efficient in a rapidly replicating cell in culture than during natural evolution, as has been shown e.g. for Drosophila cell lines [28]. Karyotyping of the cell line at passage 179, 6 years prior to the present study, revealed almost similar proportions of cells with 28 (18%),42 (14%), and 56 (16%) chromosomes, corresponding to diploid, triploid and tetraploid sets; the remaining cells were aneuploid (data not shown). By flow cytometry we did not observe this heterogeneity in genome size and our genome size estimate of 3.80 Gb by flow cytometry corresponds best to a predominantly triploid set of chromosomes. Thus, 67 additional passages seem to have favored the selection of cells in the present study with a predominant genome size of 3.80 Gb corresponding either to a triploid set of chromosomes or to the amplification of coding or non-coding regions.

Scaffolding and gap filling is an essential step towards the generation of a high-quality draft genome assembly. New technologies, such as SMRT sequencing, allow the scaffolding of large genomes even without creation of bacterial or yeast artificial chromosomes. To the best of our knowledge (at least at the time of manuscript submission), this is the first application of third generation sequencing, gap filling and scaffolding algorithms in chelicerates. The limitation of high fragmentation due to the shotgun approach with short reads in the published reference genome was overcome by their integration with ultra-long PacBio reads albeit of an inherent lower quality. Thus, the shorter high quality contigs were assembled into long high quality scaffolds: 235,953 contigs were integrated into 204,904 scaffolds. At the same time, the total length spanned was extended by more than 30% from 392,924,918 bp to 515,788,051 bp. The elongation of the assembly is based on the general extension of a high number of contigs rather than an excessive extension of a few contigs. This is reflected by a marked increase of the N50 value by 87% from a contig N50 of 1643 bp to a scaffold N50 of 3067 bp. Due to the combination of the scaffolding with the gap filling approach, only 0.007% of scaffolds contain gaps of more than 25 unknown nucleotides, the longest gap being only 141 bp. By increasing the N50 by 87% and reducing the number of scaffolds containing gaps with unknown nucleotides to 0.007%, we obtained a framework of high quality sequences, facilitating blast searches and alignment approaches against the generated scaffolds. Assuming a similar genome composition for the two closely related species I. scapularis and I. ricinus, only 30% of the genome consists of coding or unique sequences. Thus, our scaffolds potentially cover 67% of the coding sequences. Estimations of the genome assembly completeness by BUSCO retrieved 55.5% completeness for unique orthologs. Thus, the ratio of unique-repetitive sequences might slightly differ between I. scapularis and I. ricinus and/or there may be genes unique to I. ricinus which do not match any orthology comparison. Because of the high error rate of SMRT sequencing, a very high coverage is required for de novo assembly of repetitive regions. This is beyond the scope of this study, which focuses on the coding regions only.

As a first application of the improved genome information, these I. ricinus scaffolds of high sequencing quality were blast-searched against proteins annotated in I. scapularis in order to match annotations to the I. ricinus sequences. In total, 25,263 hits matched the significance criteria of at least 80% identity and a maximum e value of 1.0e-5. More than 50% of I. ricinus sequences complying with the significance criteria displayed 95–100% identity with I. scapularis protein sequences, with similar identity distributions in the different protein categories. This may demonstrate a high level of protein coding sequences conserved between the two species. Besides hypothetical or conserved hypothetical proteins, the most abundant groups comprised zinc finger proteins, secreted proteins and cytochrome P450 coding proteins. Proteins containing zinc fingers are a large and functionally diverse family of structural proteins. The majority of the tick proteins in this category were predicted to bind DNA, RNA or protein and to be involved in gene transcription, DNA replication, translational regulation, protein folding etc. [29]. The secretion of proteins during feeding and digestion is critical for the parasitic lifestyle of the tick. Salivary proteins and secreted salivary peptides, which are also among the largest annotated categories, inhibit the host’s immune system and thus facilitate prolonged feeding of the tick. Cytochrome P450 proteins play, among others, an important role in metabolic resistance, i.e. detoxification of acaricides [30].

Conclusions

After the publication of the first reference genome of the tick I. ricinus [21], the most important pathogen vector in Europe, we have now further extended and annotated the genome sequencing information by third generation sequencing. We propose a first hybrid PacBio-Illumina sequence assembly by scaffolding of the contigs. The assembly was extended by more than 30% and the utility of the scaffolds for genetic research was highly improved by almost doubling the N50 value. We estimated the I. ricinus genome size to be 2.65 Gb for laboratory-reared and field ticks from different European countries. The I. ricinus genome is 0.5 Gb or 26% larger than the genome of I. scapularis, the corresponding North American pathogen vector. Among the 25,000 sequences that we annotated, (conserved) hypothetical proteins, zinc finger proteins, secreted proteins and P450 coding proteins were among the largest protein categories. These categories correlate with important functions of the tick’s lifestyle like e.g. secretion. The annotated sequences pave the way to investigation of the different development stages of the most important European pathogen vector.

Methods

Genome size determination by flow cytometry

Labeling and fixation of cells

Primary chicken red blood cells (CRBCs; Innovative Research Inc., Novi, MI, USA), cells from the human tetraploid T cell line 1301 (Sigma-Aldrich, St. Louis, MO, USA) and cells from the embryo-derived I. ricinus cell line IRE/CTVM19 [31] at passage 246, maintained as described previously [32], were pelleted by centrifugation at 300× g for 3 min and washed twice in ice cold Staining Buffer [phosphate buffered saline (PBS; Lonza Walkersville Inc., Walkersville, MD, USA)] containing 2% fetal bovine serum (FBS; Thermo Fisher Scientific, Waltham, MA, USA) and 0.1% NaN3 (Sigma-Aldrich).

Adult male and female I. ricinus ticks were collected from the vegetation in Luxembourg by the cloth flagging method. Adult male and female I. ricinus ticks from laboratory strains from Ireland (Charles River Laboratories, Elphinstone, UK) and Germany (Insect Services, Berlin, Germany) were purchased. The nuclei preparation was adapted from Geraci et al. [27]. Three ticks per gender/origin/biological replicate were snapfrozen in liquid nitrogen, placed in ice-cold PBS containing 50% FBS and ground twice in a 2 cm3 dounce homogenizer on ice. The suspension was filtered through a 40 μm cell strainer (VWR International, Radnor, PA, USA) and centrifuged at 80× g for 3 min at 4 °C to remove particulate matter. Supernatant was collected and centrifuged at 300× g for 3 min at 4 °C. The extracted nuclei were washed twice in ice cold staining buffer and counted in a Neubauer counting chamber.

CRBCs were labeled with the CFSE Cell Division Tracker Kit (BioLegend, San Diego, CA, USA), according to the manufacturer’s protocol. Then, 1 × 106 nuclei from tick samples or cells of the IRE/CTVM19 cell line, CRBCs and the 1301 cell line were each resuspended in 100 μl ice cold Staining Buffer. Five microliters of BV421 Mouse Anti-Human CD45 antibody (Becton, Dickinson and Company (BD), Franklin Lakes, NJ, USA) were added and the nuclei/cells were incubated on ice for 20 min, protected from light. The nuclei/cells were washed twice in 1 ml Staining Buffer. Gentle ethanol fixation was done adapted from Telford et al. [33] as follows. The pellets were resuspended in 0.3 ml PBS with 50% FBS. While gently mixing, 0.9 ml ice cold 70% ethanol (VWR) was added dropwise and the nuclei/cells were incubated overnight at 4 °C.

The fixed nuclei/cells were pelleted at 1000× g for 3 min and washed in ice cold Staining Buffer. The nuclei/cells were counted and 500 μl propidium iodide (PI) staining solution (20 μg propidium iodide (Sigma-Aldrich), 200 μg DNase-free RNase A (Thermo Fisher Scientific) in 1 ml PBS) were added per 1× 106 cells. The nuclei/cells were incubated at room temperature for minimum 30 min.

Flow cytometry measurement

Samples were analyzed on an LSRFortessa (Becton, Dickinson and Company), using 405 nm and 488 nm and 561 nm lasers with 50 mW output for the detection of BV421 labeling, CFSE and PI staining, respectively. Photomultiplier settings were kept consistent throughout measurements. The results were further analyzed with the FACSDiva software (Becton, Dickinson and Company). Debris and doublets were removed by PI height over width gating. CRBCs were gated by CFSE staining, tetraploid cells by BV421 labeling. A histogram was generated based on the PI fluorescence of gated events. Mean fluorescence was analyzed by separately gating the respective signals. For each sample, three biological replicates were performed and at least 200 I. ricinus nuclei or IRE/CTVM19 cells counted per replicate.

Calculation of genome size

The mean genome sizes of multiple individual ticks of both sexes for each laboratory tick population, the collected ticks and the cell line were calculated as fold multiples of the CRBC and 1301 standards. Diploid genome size was calculated based on the following conversion formula from Bennett et al. [34]:
$$ \mathrm{Genome}\ \mathrm{size}\ \left(\mathrm{bp}\right)=\left(0.987\times {10}^9\right)\times \mathrm{D}\mathrm{N}\mathrm{A}\ \mathrm{content}\ \left(\mathrm{pg}\right). $$

A total of 2.5 pg of DNA was used as the DNA weight of a diploid CRBC (2C value) as described previously [35]. The coefficient of variation (CV) was calculated by dividing the standard deviation by the average of the distribution of measurements per group. Results with CV < 5% were considered reliable. Differences in genome size between the tick samples and the cell line were analyzed with unpaired Student’s t test (df = 4) with P < 0.05 as significance threshold using SigmaPlot (Systat Software Inc., San Jose, CA, USA).

Sequencing

High molecular weight DNA extraction

DNA was extracted from 50 I. ricinus males (Charles River Laboratories) with the Genomic-tip 20/G kit (Qiagen, Hilden, Germany) with only minimal adaptations of the manufacturer’s protocol. Ticks were ground in a precooled mortar with liquid nitrogen to a fine powder. 2 ml buffer G2 were added to the sample and incubated for 30 min at 37 °C before addition of 0.1 ml Qiagen Protease. Instead of vortexing, the sample was mixed by inversion and incubated at 50 °C for 2 h with gentle agitation. The sample was then centrifuged for 20 min at 13,500× g to remove particulate matter. The supernatant was mixed by inversion (instead of vortexing) and applied to an equilibrated Qiagen Genomic-tip. The number of washing steps with buffer QC was increased to four. Final precipitation of the DNA was done by adding 1.4 ml isopropanol to the eluted DNA and immediate centrifugation at 15,000× g for 20 min at 4 °C. The DNA pellet was dissolved overnight on a shaker at 4 °C in 10 mM Tris-Cl buffer, pH 8.5. Finally, DNA of smaller size, accidentally fragmented during processing, was removed by size selection using SPRIselect beads (Beckman Coulter, Brea, CA, USA), according to the manufacturer’s protocol, with a bead-to-sample ratio of 0.5. DNA was quantified using the Quant-iTPicoGreen dsDNA Assay Kit (Thermo Fisher Scientific) following the manufacturer’s instructions and sample quality was checked with aNanoDrop (Thermo Fisher Scientific).

PacBio and Illumina sequences

High molecular weight I. ricinus DNA was sequenced by single molecule real time (SMRT) sequencing with the PacBio RS system (Pacific Biosciences, Menlo Park, CA, USA) at Yale Center for Genome Analysis (West Haven, CT, USA). A 10 kb library was prepared (including DNA fragmentation, DNA repair, adapter ligation, sequencing primer annealing and polymerase binding), according to the manufacturer’s instructions (Pacific Biosciences). A total of 5,624,511 reads with an average read length of 2105 encompassing 11,843,540,746 nucleotides were retrieved.

DNA sequences retrieved from the same laboratory strain of I. ricinus ticks by Illumina HiSeq 2500 sequencing were described recently [21] and are publicly available at the DDBJ/EMBL/GenBank Sequence Read Archive under the accession SRP051465. Assembled contigs are accessible within the Whole Genome Shotgun project under the accession JXMZ01000000.

Bioinformatic analysis

Scaffolding, extension and gap filling

Illumina contigs (DDBJ/EMBL/GenBankWGS project JXMZ01000000) were extended, scaffolded and gaps filled based on the PacBio reads by PBJelly [36]. The procedure follows several steps. First, gaps (stretch of minimum 25 nucleotides) were identified in the contigs. Secondly, the PacBio reads were mapped against the assembled Illumina contigs as a reference using BLASR (Basic Local Alignment and Serial Refinement) [37]. Since this algorithm was designed according to the PacBio error model, no further error correction was required for the PacBio raw reads. As a result of the alignment, reads spanning into gaps were identified. The criteria for including reads into the gap filling process were defined as a minimum of 200 bp aligning to the contig ends and at least 25 bp reaching into the gap. Gaps that were too large to be spanned by a single read were closed by the flank-extension approach. This allowed reads extending beyond the flanking contigs to be assembled with overlapping reads matching within 25 bp of the start of the gap and reaching at least 25 bp further into the gap. As a result of this, many gaps were completely filled, others only partially. Therefore, the reads for each gap including 1 Kb of reference sequence from the flanking contigs were assembled with ALLORA (Pacific Biosciences Menlo Park, CA, USA) which is based on the AMOS suite [38]. In order to verify the accuracy of the assembly, we analyzed whether or not the assembly supported the gap in the same way as the read alignments had initially done, i.e. whether flanking sequences and linking sequences in the consensus sequence corresponded to the read alignment. Besides the consensus sequence, the length of the assembled sequence was analyzed for its compliance with the predicted size of the gap. The procedure was applied three times to reach the maximum number of gaps filled, as well as contigs extended and scaffolded with the existing datasets.

Genome annotation

Scaffolds obtained by integrating reference Illumina contigs (DDBJ/EMBL/GenBankWGS project JXMZ01000000) with PacBio ultralong reads were annotated based on their homology with the recently published annotated I. scapularis genome [22]. This was the only annotated tick genome available at the time of analysis and was thus used as a reference. I. ricinus scaffolds were blasted (tblastx) against annotated I. scapularis proteins (VectorBase, release IscaW1.4, February 2016) using the default parameters (Word size 3, Expect 10.0, Matrix BLOSUM62). The top hit sequences were extracted in a list format and filtered by an identity threshold of 80% and an e-value of 1.0e-5. The results were sorted and grouped according to their annotative description.

Abbreviations

CRBCs: 

Chicken red blood cells

CV: 

Coefficient of variation

SMRT: 

Single molecule real time

Declarations

Acknowledgements

We thank the Flow Cytometry Specialist Coralie Guerin (Department of Infection and Immunity, Luxembourg Institute of Health) for her support in flow cytometry. The tick cell line IRE/CTVM19 was provided by the Tick Cell Biobank at The Pirbright Institute.

Funding

This work was funded by the Luxembourgish Ministry of Research (project Marlybor, REC-LNSI-20110308). Wibke J. Cramaro was supported by a fellowship from Aides à la Formation Recherche (grant n° 4660265) of the Fonds National de la Recherche Luxembourg. Lesley Bell-Sakyi was supported by the United Kingdom Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council [grant BBS/E/1/00001741].

Availability of data and materials

The datasets supporting the conclusions of this article are included within the article (and its additional files) or are available in the NCBI repository JXMZ02000000 (https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/nuccore/JXMZ02000000).

Authors’ contributions

WJC conceived and designed the study, performed and analyzed the genome size estimation experiments, extracted high molecular weight DNA from ticks for PacBio sequencing, conceived the scaffolding and gap filling analysis and wrote the manuscript. OEH performed the genome annotation by homology analysis. LBS established and provided the IRE/CTVM19 cell line and its karyotype information and contributed to revision of the manuscript. CPM designed and supervised the study, revised the manuscript and provided critical feedback throughout the study. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Ethics approval and consent to participate

Not applicable.

Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.

Authors’ Affiliations

(1)
Luxembourg Institute of Health
(2)
The Pirbright Institute

References

  1. Hubalek Z. Epidemiology of lyme borreliosis. Curr Probl Dermatol. 2009;37:31–50.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. Stanek G, Wormser GP, Gray J, Strle F. Lyme borreliosis. Lancet. 2012;379(9814):461–73.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. Gray JS, Dautel H, Estrada-Pena A, Kahl O, Lindgren E. Effects of climate change on ticks and tick-borne diseases in europe. Interdiscip Perspect Infect Dis. 2009;2009:593232.PubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  4. Stark K, Niedrig M, Biederbick W, Merkert H, Hacker J. Climate changes and emerging diseases. What new infectious diseases and health problem can be expected?. Bundesgesundheitsbl. Gesundheitsforsch. Gesundheitsschutz. 2009;52(7):699-714.Google Scholar
  5. Estrada-Pena A, de la Fuente J. The ecology of ticks and epidemiology of tick-borne viral diseases. Antiviral Res. 2014;108:104–28.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. Randolph SE. Tick-borne disease systems emerge from the shadows: the beauty lies in molecular detail, the message in epidemiology. Parasitology. 2009;136(12):1403–13.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. Walsh MG. The relevance of forest fragmentation on the incidence of human babesiosis: investigating the landscape epidemiology of an emerging tick-borne disease. Vector Borne Zoonotic Dis. 2013;13(4):250–5.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. Daniel M, Materna J, Honig V, Metelka L, Danielova V, Harcarik J, et al. Vertical distribution of the tick Ixodes ricinus and tick-borne pathogens in the northern Moravian mountains correlated with climate warming (Jeseniky Mts., Czech Republic). Cent Eur J Public Health. 2009;17(3):139–45.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. Jaenson TG, Jaenson DG, Eisen L, Petersson E, Lindgren E. Changes in the geographical distribution and abundance of the tick Ixodes ricinus during the past 30 years in Sweden. Parasit Vectors. 2012;5:8.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  10. Jore S, Viljugrein H, Hofshagen M, Brun-Hansen H, Kristoffersen AB, Nygard K, et al. Multi-source analysis reveals latitudinal and altitudinal shifts in range of Ixodes ricinus at its northern distribution limit. Parasit Vectors. 2011;4:84.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  11. Medlock JM, Hansford KM, Bormane A, Derdakova M, Estrada-Pena A, George JC, et al. Driving forces for changes in geographical distribution of Ixodes ricinus ticks in Europe. Parasit Vectors. 2013;6:1.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  12. Ginsberg HS, Faulde MK. Ticks. In: Bonnefoy X, Kampen H&Sweeney K, editors. Public Health Significance of Urban Pests. Copenhagen: World Health Organization (WHO) Regional Office for Europe; 2008. p. 303–45.Google Scholar
  13. Zakovska A, Nejezchlebova H, Bartonkova N, Rasovska T, Kucerova H, Norek A, Ovesna P. Activity of the tick Ixodes ricinus monitored in a suburban park in Brno, Czech Republic, in association with the evaluation of selected repellents. J Vector Ecol. 2013;38(2):295–300.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. Maetzel D, Maier WA, Kampen H. Borrelia burgdorferi infection prevalences in questing Ixodes ricinus ticks (Acari: Ixodidae) in urban and suburban Bonn, western Germany. Parasitol Res. 2005;95(1):5–12.Google Scholar
  15. Pangracova L, Derdakova M, Pekarik L, Hviscova I, Vichova B, Stanko M, et al. Ixodes ricinus abundance and its infection with the tick-borne pathogens in urban and suburban areas of Eastern Slovakia. Parasit Vectors. 2013;6(1):238.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  16. Schorn S, Pfister K, Reulen H, Mahling M, Silaghi C. Occurrence of Babesia spp., Rickettsia spp. and Bartonella spp. in Ixodes ricinus in Bavarian public parks, Germany. Parasit Vectors. 2011;4:135.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  17. Wielinga PR, Gaasenbeek C, Fonville M, de Boer A, de Vries A, Dimmers W, et al. Longitudinal analysis of tick densities and Borrelia, Anaplasma, and Ehrlichia infections of Ixodes ricinus ticks in different habitat areas in The Netherlands. Appl Environ Microbiol. 2006;72(12):7594–601.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  18. Reye AL, Hubschen JM, Sausy A, Muller CP. Prevalence and seasonality of tick-borne pathogens in questing Ixodes ricinus ticks from Luxembourg. Appl Environ Microbiol. 2010;76(9):2923–31.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  19. Maritz-Olivier C, Stutzer C, Jongejan F, Neitz AW, Gaspar AR. Tick anti-hemostatics: targets for future vaccines and therapeutics. Trends Parasitol. 2007;23(9):397–407.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. Hepburn NJ, Williams AS, Nunn MA, Chamberlain-Banoub JC, Hamer J, Morgan BP, Harris CL. In vivo characterization and therapeutic efficacy of a C5-specific inhibitor from the soft tick Ornithodoros moubata. J Biol Chem. 2007;282(11):8292–9.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. Cramaro WJ, Revets D, Hunewald OE, Sinner R, Reye AL, Muller CP. Integration of Ixodes ricinus genome sequencing with transcriptome and proteome annotation of the naive midgut. BMC Genomics. 2015;16(1):871.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  22. Gulia-Nuss M, Nuss AB, Meyer JM, Sonenshine DE, Roe RM, Waterhouse RM, et al. Genomic insights into the Ixodes scapularis tick vector of Lyme disease. Nat Commun. 2016;7:10507.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  23. Chen C. Comparative studies on the karyotypes and C-Banding chromosomes of Ixodes dammini Spielman, Clifford, Piesman& Corwin, I. scapularis Say and I. pacificus Cooley & Kohls (Acari: Ixodidae). Legay ETDs: Georgia Southern University; 1991. Paper 400.Google Scholar
  24. Kahn J. Cytotaxonomy of Ticks. J Cell Sci.1964;s3-105:123-137.Google Scholar
  25. Meyer JM, Kurtti TJ, Van Zee JP, Hill CA. Genome organization of major tandem repeats in the hard tick, Ixodes scapularis. Chromosome Res. 2010;18(3):357–70.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  26. Ullmann AJ, Lima CM, Guerrero FD, Piesman J, Black WC. Genome size and organization in the blacklegged tick, Ixodes scapularis and the Southern cattle tick, Boophilus microplus. Insect Mol Biol. 2005;14(2):217–22.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  27. Geraci NS, Spencer Johnston J, Paul Robinson J, Wikel SK, Hill CA. Variation in genome size of argasid and ixodid ticks. Insect Biochem Mol Biol. 2007;37(5):399–408.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  28. Lee H, McManus CJ, Cho DY, Eaton M, Renda F, Somma MP, et al. DNA copy number evolution in Drosophila cell lines. Genome Biol. 2014;15(8):R70.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  29. Krishna SS, Majumdar I, Grishin NV. Structural classification of zinc fingers: survey and summary. Nucleic Acids Res. 2003;31(2):532–50.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  30. Sonenshine DE, Roe RM. Biology of Ticks, vol. 1, 2nd edn. United Kingdom: Oxford University Press; 2013.Google Scholar
  31. Bell-Sakyi L, Zweygarth E, Blouin EF, Gould EA, Jongejan F. Tick cell lines: tools for tick and tick-borne disease research. Trends Parasitol. 2007;23(9):450–7.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  32. Weisheit S, Villar M, Tykalova H, Popara M, Loecherbach J, Watson M, et al. Ixodes scapularis and Ixodes ricinus tick cell lines respond to infection with tick-borne encephalitis virus: transcriptomic and proteomic analysis. Parasit Vectors. 2015;8:599.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  33. Telford WG, King LE, Fraker PJ. Evaluation of glucocorticoid-induced DNA fragmentation in mouse thymocytes by flow cytometry. Cell Prolif. 1991;24(5):447–59.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  34. Dolezel J, Bartos J, Voglmayr H, Greilhuber J. Nuclear DNA content and genome size of trout and human. Cytometry A. 2003;51(2):127–8. author reply 129.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  35. Bennett MD, Leitch IJ, Price HJ, Johnston JS. Comparisons with Caenorhabditis (approximately 100 Mb) and Drosophila (approximately 175 Mb) using flow cytometry show genome size in Arabidopsis to be approximately 157 Mb and thus approximately 25% larger than the Arabidopsis genome initiative estimate of approximately 125 Mb. Ann Bot. 2003;91(5):547–57.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  36. English AC, Richards S, Han Y, Wang M, Vee V, Qu J, et al. Mind the gap: upgrading genomes with Pacific Biosciences RS long-read sequencing technology. PLoS One. 2012;7(11):e47768.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  37. Chaisson MJ, Tesler G. Mapping single molecule sequencing reads using basic local alignment with successive refinement (BLASR): application and theory. BMC Bioinformatics. 2012;13:238.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  38. Treangen TJ, Sommer DD, Angly FE, Koren S, Pop M. Next generation sequence assembly with AMOS. Curr Protoc Bioinformatics.2011;Chapter 11:Unit 11 18.Google Scholar

Copyright

© The Author(s). 2017

Comments

By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.

Advertisement