Open Access

Subtyping of Blastocystis sp. isolated from symptomatic and asymptomatic individuals in Makkah, Saudi Arabia

  • Raafat T. Mohamed1, 2Email author,
  • Mohammed A. El-Bali1,
  • Anhar A. Mohamed1, 3,
  • Mona A. Abdel-Fatah3, 4,
  • Mohamed A. EL-Malky1, 5,
  • Nawras M. Mowafy1, 2,
  • Dina A. Zaghlool6, 7,
  • Rowaida A. Bakri1 and
  • Saeed A. Al-Harthi1
Parasites & Vectors201710:174

https://doi.org/10.1186/s13071-017-2114-8

Received: 28 July 2016

Accepted: 27 March 2017

Published: 7 April 2017

Abstract

Background

Blastocystis is a group of cosmopolitan gastrointestinal parasite of humans and a wide variety of animals. These anaerobic protozoans include more than 17 specific small-subunit ribosomal RNA subtypes, of which nine are found in humans with a variable geographical distribution. Until now, no study has described the Blastocystis subtypes present in Saudi Arabia.

Methods

In total, 1,262 faecal samples were collected from patients with gastrointestinal complaints and asymptomatic individuals visiting two major hospitals. All samples were analysed by F1/R1 diagnostic PCR, microscopy and culture methods. The subtypes of Blastocystis sp. isolates were determined by the sequenced-tagged site (STS)-based method.

Results

One-hundred-thirty-three positive cases were detected by F1/R1 diagnostic PCR, of which 122 were also positive by the culture method and 83 by direct microscopy. The sensitivities of direct microscopy and the culture method were 62% and 92%, respectively. Subtype (ST3) was the most prevalent (80.5%), followed by ST1 (14.5%) and ST2 (5%). ST4, ST5, ST6 and ST7 were not detected in this study. ST3 infections were significantly predominant (P < 0.05) among symptomatic patients.

Conclusions

To our knowledge, this study provides the first run-through information on Blastocystis sp. epidemiology in Makkah city, revealing a rather moderate prevalence of 10.5% and the presence of three subtypes, ST1, ST2, and ST3. ST3 was the most predominant, particularly among symptomatic patients.

Keywords

Blastocystis spSequence-Tagged Sites (STS) PCRSubtypingMakkah city

Background

Blastocystis is a group of cosmopolitan gastrointestinal anaerobic protozoan parasites. The group is known to infect humans and a wide variety of animal hosts, including mammals, birds, amphibians, and reptiles [1]. The life-cycle comprises numerous ‘forms’, including granular cysts and multivacuolar, avacuolar, vacuolar, and amoeboid structures. The mode of infection has not been completely understood until now, but involves faecal-oral ingestion of a cyst, with animal handlers showing significantly high rates of infection [2, 3]. Blastocystis has a worldwide distribution with a marked prevalence in many countries. According to most epidemiological studies, nearly all countries of the world have been classified into well-developed, with a moderate prevalence (10-15%), or under-developed, with a high prevalence (55–70%), attributed to the levels of hygiene and the presence or absence of contact with animals and/or contaminated water and food [4, 5].

Blastocystis may exist in the gut for years; however, the recognition of a high prevalence of Blastocystis in healthy populations using sensitive molecular diagnostic tools has led to a standard shift in clinical Blastocystis research. Studies of the gut microbiota in individuals with and without Blastocystis can provide important information to help determine the role of Blastocystis in human health and disease [6]. Additionally, the Blastocystis parasite appears to be more common in healthy individuals than in patients with inflammatory bowel disease and is associated with certain gut microbiota and health indicators. Although the parasite may elicit disease under certain conditions, the focus on Blastocystis may be shifting from a clinical to a public health viewpoint [7]. SSU rRNA-based phylogeny and host origins do not associate with each other for the classification of different Blastocystis isolates that are derived from humans to insects. The Blastocystis sp. subtype (ST) classification is applied for Blastocystis isolates from homoeothermic animals because their origin is from humans, and they are classified into nine genetically different STs. However, the situation in poikilothermic animals, such as reptiles and amphibians, suggests difficulties; therefore, determining the complete sequence of SSU rDNA is essential to establish novel ST in the phylogenetic analysis [8].

In Blastocystis sp. infection, the symptoms are mostly nonspecific and include weight loss, nausea, vomiting, flatulence, abdominal pain, and diarrhoea [9, 10]. However, the pathogenicity of this parasite is still argumentative and non-conclusive; Blastocystis sp. infections have been reported in several countries in many asymptomatic and apparently healthy individuals as well as in symptomatic cases without any obvious causal organisms [2]. Several studies have deduced that only a few subtypes of Blastocystis sp. can cause symptoms. It was concluded that the proteases of Blastocystis sp. subtype 3 (ST3) were responsible for protein degradation with host immune evasion and are an important virulence factor [11, 12]. Another study correlated Blastocystis sp. subtype 3 infections with idiopathic urticaria [12].

In last few years, several molecular tools have been used to classify the Blastocystis sp. subtypes isolated from humans and animals in different regions worldwide. These techniques include random amplified polymorphic DNA (RAPD) using four different arbitrary polymerase chain reaction (PCR) primers [13] and PCR assays followed by restriction fragment length polymorphism (RFLP) to study the sequence variation in the small-subunit ribosomal RNA genes of isolates [14]. More recently, new PCR-based methods have been developed for subtype classification using known sequenced-tagged site (STS) primer sets [15] in combination with single-strand conformational polymorphism (SSCP) analysis [1] or post-PCR pyrosequencing techniques based on the detection of subtype-specific nucleotide polymorphism in the SSU rRNA gene [16, 17], fingerprinting with AP-PCR [18], and multilocus sequence typing [19]. The latest epidemiological studies have shown the great diversity of Blastocystis sp. subtypes; ten subtypes (ST1 to ST10) have been found according to SSU rRNA gene sequences [20]. Seven other subtypes (ST11–ST17) have been identified in isolates from livestock and zoo animals [21]. Among all identified subtypes, only ST1 to ST9 are considered to be human Blastocystis sp. subtypes [10, 22]. Some authors recommend a standardization of Blastocystis terminology to simplify statements and show the relationships of the research results. This primarily depends on the already published data on small-subunit ribosomal RNA gene analyses and suggests that all mammalian and avian isolates should be nominated as Blastocystis sp. [23]. Using Blastocystis genetic markers, the barcode region is the best region to use in publicly available sequence databases at GenBank, while the STS primers represent a suitable approach in situations where sequencing is not an option, and the disadvantages of using STS primers are that some subtypes will go undetected, includes ST8 and ST9 and also the majority of ST4 strains [24].

To our knowledge, no previous study has explored the prevalence and subtype distribution of Blastocystis sp. in Saudi Arabia. The aim of the present study was to explore the Blastocystis sp. relative prevalence and subtypes present in one of the major cities in Saudi Arabia. This survey was performed on faecal samples collected from symptomatic and asymptomatic individuals who visited, over a 10-month period, two major hospitals of Makkah city, Saudi Arabia.

Methods

Sample collection

This study was carried out from March 2014 to January 2015 at two major health care centres of Makkah city, King Abdellah medical city and Al-Noor Specialist Hospital. Of all faecal specimens received during this period by Parasitology Laboratory units, in both hospitals, 1,262 specimens were included in this investigation. Approximately 50% of the collected samples were from patients with gastro-intestinal complaints, including severe abdominal pain and diarrhoea, and the other 50% were from apparently healthy individuals who underwent a regular check-up or mandatory health check.

Microscopic examination and in vitro culture

The referred faecal specimens are routinely examined by microscopy for parasitic infections using the direct smear method with saline and iodine. Samples from suspected patients, if negative by direct microscopy, are further examined after trichrome permanent staining and according to the formalin ethyl acetate concentration. For this study, each collected sample was split into two parts; one part was kept at -20 °C, and the other part was inoculated in culture media and transferred to the medical parasitology laboratory of the Faculty of Medicine at Umm Al Qura University for sub-culturing and molecular analysis. The culture medium consisted of Dulbecco's modified Eagle medium (DMEM) (Gibco, Thermo Fisher Scientific, MA, USA) containing 12 mg/ml ampicillin and 4 mg/ml streptomycin supplemented with 20% inactivated horse serum (Gibco) sterilized by filtration [25]. The samples were cultured in 11 × 100 mm sterile screw-capped tubes containing 3 ml of media and were incubated at 37 °C in an anaerobic gas pack (BD gas pack-Becton, Dickinson, USA). A drop of culture was examined after 72 h by direct microscopy.

DNA extraction

Genomic DNA was extracted directly from stool samples using the ZR faecal DNA miniprep kit (Zymo Research, Tustin, CA, USA) and from cell pellets of positive cultures using the QIAmp DNA extraction kit (QIAmp, QIAGEN, Inc., Hilden, Germany), according to manufacturers’ protocols. The concentration and purity of isolated DNA were measured by a spectrophotometer (SpectraDrop; SpectroMax, Life Technology, Carlsbad City, CA, USA).

F1/R1 diagnostic PCR

Diagnostic PCR was applied to genomic DNA extracted from stool specimens using the F1 (5'-GGA GGT AGT GAC AAT AAA TC-3') and R1 (5'-CGT TCA TGA TGA ACA ATT AC-3') primers [26]. Briefly, 2 μl of genomic DNA was used in PCR reactions of a 25 μl final volume using the AmpliTaq Gold 360 master mix (Applied Biosystems, CA, USA). The PCR conditions consisted of one cycle of initial denaturation at 94 °C for 4 min, followed by 35 cycles of denaturation at 94 °C for 30 s, annealing at 54 °C for 30 s, extension at 72 °C for 30 s, and a final elongation cycle for 5 min at 72 °C.

Blastocystis sp. subtyping using Sequence-Tagged Site (STS) primers

PCR reactions were carried out using sequence-tagged site primer sets derived from the RAPD product sequence to identify the subtypes as follows: ST1 variant (SB82: 5'-TCT TGC TTC ATC GGA GTC / CCT TCT CGC AGT TCT TTA TC-3'), ST1 (SB83: 5'-GAA GGA CTC TCT GAC GAT GA / GTC CAA ATG AAA GGC AGC-3'), ST7 (SB155: 5'-ATC AGC CTA CAA TCT CCT C / ATC GCC ACT TCT CCA AT-3'), ST3 by multiplex PCR including (SB227: 5'-AGG ATT TGG TGT TTG GAG A / TTA GAA GTG AAG GAG ATG GAA G-3', SB228: 5'-GAC TCC AGA AAC TCG CAG AC / TCT TGT TTC CCC AGT TAT CC-3' and SB229: 5'-CAC TGT GTC GTC ATT GTT TTG / AGG GCT GCA TAA TAG AGT GG-3'), ST6 (SB332: 5'-GCA TCC AGA CTA CTA TCA ACA TT / CCA TTT TCA GAC AAC CAC TTA-3'), ST5 (SB336: 5'-GTG GGT AGA GGA AGG AAA ACA / AGA ACA AGT CGA TGA AGT GAG AT-3'), ST4 (SB337: 5'-GTC TTT CCC TGT CTA TTC TTG CA / AAT TCG GTC TGC TTC TTC TG-3'), and ST2 (SB340: 5'-TGT TCT TGT GTC TTC TCA GCT C / TTC TTT CAC ACT CCC GTC AT-3') [15]. Two microlitres of DNA extract were used in PCR reactions of a 25 μl final volume using the AmpliTaq Gold 360 master mix (Applied Biosystems, Carlsbad City, CA, USA). The PCR conditions consisted of one cycle of initial denaturation at 94 °C for 5 min, followed by 40 cycles that included denaturation at 94 °C for 30 s, annealing at 57 °C for 30 s, extension at 72 °C for 1 min, and a final elongation cycle for 5 min at 72 °C. All PCR amplifications were carried out in duplicate for each sample and each primer set. The PCR products were separated in 1.5% agarose gels and were photographed.

Statistical analysis

The data were analysed using the Chi-square test to compare the frequency of the Blastocystis sp. subtypes from symptomatic and asymptomatic individuals. A P-value < 0.05 was statistically significant. Statistical analysis was performed using SPSS version 21.

Results

Relative prevalence of Blastocystis sp. based on microscopy and in vitro culture

Of 1,262 examined faecal samples, 133 specimens were found to be positive for Blastocystis by the F1/R1 diagnostic PCR technique used in this study. Among positive cases, 85 (64%) were patients with gastrointestinal symptoms and 48 (36%) were asymptomatic individuals. The general symptoms consisted of abdominal pain in approximately 76%, diarrhoea in approximately 27% and other gastrointestinal complaints in approximately 16% of the symptomatic patients. All 133 positive cases were detected by F1/R1 diagnostic PCR, of which 122 were also positive by the culture method and 83 by direct microscopy. The sensitivities of direct microscopy and the culture methods compared with that of F1/R1 PCR and are shown in Table 1.
Table 1

Sensitivity of F1/R1 PCR, direct microscopy, and the culture method for the diagnosis of Blastocystis sp. infections in the stool samples of patients with GI symptoms and asymptomatic individuals

Diagnostic technique

Symptomatic (n = 85)

Asymptomatic (n = 48)

Total (n = 133)

Sensitivity

Direct microscopy

65

18

83

62%

In vitro culture

79

43

122

92%

F1/R1 PCR

85

48

133

100%

STS subtyping analysis of Blastocystis sp. isolates

Three Blastocystis sp. subtypes (ST1, ST2 and ST3) were detected by STS primer-based PCR analysis of positive samples. ST3 was the most prevalent (80.5%), followed by ST1 (14.5%) and ST2 (5%). ST4, ST5, ST6 and ST7 were not detected in this study. ST3 infections were significantly predominant (χ 2 = 6.54, df = 2, P = 0.038) among symptomatic patients (Fig. 1). The Blastocystis sp. subtype distribution did not show a predisposition in relation to the age or gender of infected individuals.
Fig. 1

Subtype distribution of Blastocystis sp. among gastrointestinal patients and asymptomatic individuals. Subtype 3 was 69% in symptomatic patients and 31% in asymptomatic individuals (χ 2 = 6.54, df = 2, P < 0.05)

Discussion

In this study, the relative prevalence of Blastocystis sp. infection among individuals with or without gastrointestinal symptoms who visited two major hospitals in Makkah city was determined to be 10.5%. Since the prevalence data are usually derived from general surveys of intestinal parasites using the formol acetate concentration technique with microscopic examination, such numbers should be interpreted with extreme caution because the sensitivities of this method are lower than those of nucleic acid-based methods, including conventional and real-time PCR [7]. Epidemiological studies in several countries with different sanitation standards revealed wide ranges of Blastocystis sp. prevalence: 0.54% in Turkey [27], 2.5% in Japan [15], 3.3% in Singapore [28], 19% in Lebanon [29], 22.1% in Libya [30], 33.3% in Egypt [31], 40.7% in the Philippines [32] and 46.9% in Venezuela [33]. Thus, the prevalence found herein is relatively moderate compared with the worldwide general infection situation.

Numerous conflicting reports on the pathogenic capability of Blastocystis sp. infection have been published, and it is still under debate whether Blastocystis sp. is a pathogenic or a commensal life form [2]. In our study, Blastocystis infections were detected both in patients with patent gastrointestinal symptoms (85 cases) and in apparently healthy individuals (48) who underwent mandatory health check-ups. Additionally, 78.5% of symptomatic patients and 21.5% of asymptomatic individuals with PCR-positive infections were positive by microscopy; accordingly, it has been reported that the Blastocystis cell density is usually significantly higher in symptomatic patients [34]. Comparative studies of human immunity against Blastocystis infection have revealed a significant difference in antibody responses between symptomatic and asymptomatic individuals [35, 36]. However, antigenic heterogeneity has been detected between Blastocystis sp. isolated from symptomatic patients and asymptomatic individuals in axenic culture; however, these studies did not explore any possible correlations between this heterogeneity and genetic subtypes [37].

Nine subtypes of Blastocystis sp. (ST1 to ST9) were identified in humans [10]. To our knowledge, this is the first report exploring the subtypes of Blastocystis in Makkah city, Saudi Arabia. Using sequence-tagged site (STS) primer-based PCR, we found three Blastocystis sp. subtypes (ST1, ST2 and ST3) among the 133 positive cases. The high predominance of ST3 (80.5%) in our study population agrees with different reports in the literature; ST3 was found to be the most dominant subtype, varying from 41% to 92%, in a comparative study between Japan, Bangladesh, Pakistan and Germany [15] and at 78%, 75.9%, 54.5%, 53.5% and 33.3% in Singapore, Turkey, Egypt, France and Lebanon, respectively [28, 29, 3840]. However, the ST1 (50%) subtype was found to be more predominant than ST3 (39.5%) in the Libyan population [41], as confirmed by a more recent study reporting the predominance of ST1 (51.1%) over ST3 (17.8%) in Libya [30]. Although ST2 is commonly reported to be the second most prevalent subtype [4245], in our study, only 5% of cases carried the ST2 subtype, while 14.5% carried ST1.

Subtypes ST4, ST5, ST6 and ST7, as reported in previous studies [39, 46, 47], were not detected in our investigation. ST4 was remarkably common in Danish patients with acute diarrhoea [48], symptomatic patients in Spain [43], and rural communities in Nepal [49]. ST6 and ST7 were reported in the Middle East both in irritable bowel syndrome patients and healthy persons [39, 47]. However, ST5 was mostly reported in animals and humans living near to farms [16, 50].

In many previous studies, no association was reported between the specific subtype of Blastocystis sp. and explicit gastrointestinal symptoms [40, 46, 51]. However, other studies reported a specific association between subtypes of the parasite and apparent symptoms: it was demonstrated that Blastocystis cysteine proteinase can degrade human IgA [52]. Additionally, patients with chronic gastrointestinal illness with reported antibiotic failure for over four years were diagnosed with ST3 and ST1 infections [53]. More recently, irritable bowel syndrome in several Mexican patients was associated with Blastocystis sp. ST1 and ST3 infections [54]. Consistently, ST3 infections were significantly predominant among symptomatic patients (69%) in our study. Blastocystis sp. ST2 infection was linked to gastrointestinal illness and chronic urticaria [55].

In our findings, this subtype did not show an apparent predominance in distribution between symptomatic and asymptomatic infected individuals. However, it appears that the Blastocystis sp. infection clinical outcome is multifactorial, complicating the evaluation of its pathogenicity, even during case-controlled studies [5].

Conclusions

The outcome of this study provides the first run-through information on Blastocystis sp. epidemiology in Makkah city, revealing a relatively moderate prevalence (10.5%), as well as the presence of three subtypes: ST3, the most predominant particularly among symptomatic patients; ST1; and ST2. Further screenings are needed to clarify the epidemiology of this gastrointestinal parasite in local and emigrant populations of the entire country. Likewise, the present study underlines the advantage of STS-PCR as a significant technique for Blastocystis sp. subtyping in epidemiological studies.

Abbreviations

AP-PCR: 

Arbitrary primer polymerase chain reaction

DMEM: 

Dulbecco's modified Eagle medium

RAPD: 

Random amplified polymorphic DNA

RFLP: 

Restriction fragment length polymorphism

SSCP: 

Single strand conformational polymorphisms

SSU rRNA: 

Small-subunit of the ribosomal RNA

STS: 

Sequence-tagged site

STs: 

Subtypes

Declarations

Acknowledgements

We would like to thank the Faculty of Medicine at Umm Al Qura University for providing research facilities for this work. This publication was made possible by the support of the ISR program of UQU, Makkah, Saudi Arabia (Grant No. 43409049).

Funding

This research was funded by the ISR program of Umm Al-Qura University, Makkah (Grant No. 43409049). The funding body played no role in designing the research study or collection, analysis and interpretation or even in writing the manuscript.

Availability of data and materials

The dataset supporting the conclusions of this article is included within the article.

Authors’ contributions

RTM, MAE and AAM conceived the study, carried out in vitro culture, performed subtyping PCR, and wrote the manuscript. MAA and DAZ collected the patient data and stool samples. MAA, MAE, NMM and DAZ processed the stool specimens and performed microscopic examination. SAA and RAB analysed the data and participated in the writing of the manuscript. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Ethics approval and consent to participate

Ethical approval for this project was obtained from the Medical Research Centre and Research Committee at the Faculty of Medicine, Umm Al-Qura University, Saudi Arabia (Research protocol# 43409049). All participants who joined this research had signed an informed consent.

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.

Authors’ Affiliations

(1)
Department of Medical Parasitology, Faculty of Medicine, Umm Al-Qura University
(2)
Department of Medical Parasitology, Faculty of Medicine, El-Minia University
(3)
Department of Medical Parasitology, Faculty of Medicine, Ain Shams University
(4)
Microbiology Laboratory, King Abdellah Medical City
(5)
Department of Medical Parasitology, Faculty of Medicine, Mansoura University
(6)
Laboratory and Blood Bank Department, Al-Noor Specialist Hospital
(7)
Department of Medical Parasitology, Faculty of Medicine, Assiut University

References

  1. Menounos PG, Spanakos G, Tegos N, Vassalos CM, Papadopoulou C, Vakalis NC. Direct detection of Blastocystis sp. in human faecal samples and subtype assignment using single strand conformational polymorphism and sequencing. Mol Cell Probes. 2008;22(1):24–9.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. Stenzel DJ, Boreham PF. Blastocystis hominis revisited. Clin Microbiol Rev. 1996;9(4):563–84.PubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  3. Yoshikawa H, Abe N, Iwasawa M, Kitano S, Nagano I, Wu Z, Takahashi Y. Genomic analysis of Blastocystis hominis strains isolated from two long-term health care facilities. J Clin Microbiol. 2000;38(4):1324–30.PubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  4. Forsell J, Granlund M, Stensvold CR, Clark CG, Evengard B. Subtype analysis of Blastocystis isolates in Swedish patients. Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis. 2012;31(7):1689–96.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. Tan KS. New insights on classification, identification, and clinical relevance of Blastocystis spp. Clin Microbiol Rev. 2008;21(4):639–65.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  6. Stensvold CR, Clark CG. Current status of Blastocystis: A personal view. Parasitol Int. 2016;65(6 Pt B):763–71.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. Andersen LO, Stensvold CR. Blastocystis in Health and Disease. Are we moving from a clinical to a public health perspective? J Clin Microbiol. 2016;54(3):524–8.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  8. Yoshikawa H, Koyama Y, Tsuchiya E, Takami K. Blastocystis phylogeny among various isolates from humans to insects. Parasitol Int. 2016;65(6 Pt B):750–9.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. Tasova Y, Sahin B, Koltas S, Paydas S. Clinical significance and frequency of Blastocystis hominis in Turkish patients with hematological malignancy. Acta Med Okayama. 2000;54(3):133–6.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. Rene BA, Stensvold CR, Badsberg JH, Nielsen HV. Subtype analysis of Blastocystis isolates from Blastocystis cyst excreting patients. Am J Trop Med Hyg. 2009;80(4):588–92.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. Abdel-Hameed DM, Hassanin OM. Proteaese activity of Blastocystis hominis subtype3 in symptomatic and asymptomatic patients. Parasitol Res. 2011;109(2):321–7.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. Hameed DM, Hassanin OM, Zuel-Fakkar NM. Association of Blastocystis hominis genetic subtypes with urticaria. Parasitol Res. 2011;108(3):553–60.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. Yoshikawa H, Nagano I, Wu Z, Yap EH, Singh M, Takahashi Y. Genomic polymorphism among Blastocystis hominis strains and development of subtype-specific diagnostic primers. Mol Cell Probes. 1998;12(3):153–9.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. Clark CG. Extensive genetic diversity in Blastocystis hominis. Mol Biochem Parasitol. 1997;87(1):79–83.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. Yoshikawa H, Wu Z, Kimata I, Iseki M, Ali IK, Hossain MB, et al. Polymerase chain reaction-based genotype classification among human Blastocystis hominis populations isolated from different countries. Parasitol Res. 2004;92(1):22–9.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. Yan Y, Su S, Ye J, Lai X, Lai R, Liao H, et al. Blastocystis sp. subtype 5: a possibly zoonotic genotype. Parasitol Res. 2007;101(6):1527–32.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. Stensvold CR, Traub RJ, von Samson-Himmelstjerna G, Jespersgaard C, Nielsen HV, Thompson RC. Blastocystis: subtyping isolates using pyrosequencing technology. Exp Parasitol. 2007;116(2):111–9.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. Tan TC, Suresh KG, Thong KL, Smith HV. PCR fingerprinting of Blastocystis isolated from symptomatic and asymptomatic human hosts. Parasitol Res. 2006;99(4):459–65.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. Arisue N, Hashimoto T, Yoshikawa H, Nakamura Y, Nakamura G, Nakamura F, et al. Phylogenetic position of Blastocystis hominis and of stramenopiles inferred from multiple molecular sequence data. J Eukaryot Microbiol. 2002;49(1):42–53.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. Stensvold CR, Alfellani MA, Norskov-Lauritsen S, Prip K, Victory EL, Maddox C, et al. Subtype distribution of Blastocystis isolates from synanthropic and zoo animals and identification of a new subtype. Int J Parasitol. 2009;39(4):473–9.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. Alfellani MA, Taner-Mulla D, Jacob AS, Imeede CA, Yoshikawa H, Stensvold CR, Clark CG. Genetic diversity of blastocystis in livestock and zoo animals. Protist. 2013;164(4):497–509.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. Parkar U, Traub RJ, Vitali S, Elliot A, Levecke B, Robertson I, et al. Molecular characterization of Blastocystis isolates from zoo animals and their animal-keepers. Vet Parasitol. 2010;169(1-2):8–17.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. Stensvold CR, Suresh GK, Tan KS, Thompson RC, Traub RJ, Viscogliosi E, et al. Terminology for Blastocystis subtypes--a consensus. Trends Parasitol. 2007;23(3):93–6.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. Stensvold CR. Comparison of sequencing (barcode region) and sequence-tagged-site PCR for Blastocystis subtyping. J Clin Microbiol. 2013;51(1):190–4.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  25. Zhang X, Qiao JY, Da R, Li YQ, Yao FR. In vitro culture of Blastocystis hominis in medium DMEM. Wei Sheng Yan Jiu. 2006;35(6):743–6 (In Chinese).PubMedGoogle Scholar
  26. Bohm-Gloning B, Knobloch J, Walderich B. Five subgroups of Blastocystis hominis from symptomatic and asymptomatic patients revealed by restriction site analysis of PCR-amplified 16S-like rDNA. Trop Med Int Health. 1997;2(8):771–8.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  27. Beyhan YE, Yilmaz H, Cengiz ZT, Ekici A. Clinical significance and prevalence of Blastocystis hominis in Van, Turkey. Saudi Med J. 2015;36(9):1118–21.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  28. Wong KH, Ng GC, Lin RT, Yoshikawa H, Taylor MB, Tan KS. Predominance of subtype 3 among Blastocystis isolates from a major hospital in Singapore. Parasitol Res. 2008;102(4):663–70.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  29. El Safadi D, Meloni D, Poirier P, Osman M, Cian A, Gaayeb L, et al. Molecular epidemiology of Blastocystis in Lebanon and correlation between subtype 1 and gastrointestinal symptoms. Am J Trop Med Hyg. 2013;88(6):1203–6.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  30. Abdulsalam AM, Ithoi I, Al-Mekhlafi HM, Al-Mekhlafi AM, Ahmed A, Surin J. Subtype distribution of Blastocystis isolates in Sebha. Libya PloS one. 2013;8(12):e84372.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  31. Rayan HZ, Ismail OA, El Gayar EK. Prevalence and clinical features of Dientamoeba fragilis infections in patients suspected to have intestinal parasitic infection. J Egypt Soc Parasitol. 2007;37(2):599–608.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  32. Baldo ET, Belizario VY, De Leon WU, Kong HH, Chung DI. Infection status of intestinal parasites in children living in residential institutions in Metro Manila, the Philippines. Korean J Parasitol. 2004;42(2):67–70.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  33. Velasquez V, Caldera R, Wong W, Cermeno G, Fuentes M, Blanco Y, et al. Blastocystosis: a high prevalence of cases found in patients from Health Center of Soledad, Anzoategui State, Venezuela. Rev Soc Bras Med Trop. 2005;38(4):356–7 (In Spanish).View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  34. Al-Fellani MA, Khan AH, Al-Gazoui RM, Zaid MK, Al-Ferjani MA. Prevalence and clinical features of Blastocystis hominis infection among patients in Sebha, Libya. Sultan Qaboos Univ Med J. 2007;7(1):35–40.PubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  35. Zierdt CH, Zierdt WS, Nagy B. Enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay for detection of serum antibody to Blastocystis hominis in symptomatic infections. J Parasitol. 1995;81(1):127–9.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  36. Hussain R, Jaferi W, Zuberi S, Baqai R, Abrar N, Ahmed A, Zaman V. Significantly increased IgG2 subclass antibody levels to Blastocystis hominis in patients with irritable bowel syndrome. Am J Trop Med Hyg. 1997;56(3):301–6.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  37. Lanuza MD, Carbajal JA, Villar J, Mir A, Borras R. Soluble-protein and antigenic heterogeneity in axenic Blastocystis hominis isolates: pathogenic implications. Parasitol Res. 1999;85(2):93–7.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  38. Ozyurt M, Kurt O, Molbak K, Nielsen HV, Haznedaroglu T, Stensvold CR. Molecular epidemiology of Blastocystis infections in Turkey. Parasitol Int. 2008;57(3):300–6.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  39. Hussein EM, Hussein AM, Eida MM, Atwa MM. Pathophysiological variability of different genotypes of human Blastocystis hominis Egyptian isolates in experimentally infected rats. Parasitol Res. 2008;102(5):853–60.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  40. Souppart L, Sanciu G, Cian A, Wawrzyniak I, Delbac F, Capron M, et al. Molecular epidemiology of human Blastocystis isolates in France. Parasitol Res. 2009;105(2):413–21.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  41. Alfellani MA, Stensvold CR, Vidal-Lapiedra A, Onuoha ES, Fagbenro-Beyioku AF, Clark CG. Variable geographic distribution of Blastocystis subtypes and its potential implications. Acta Trop. 2013;126(1):11–8.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  42. Dogruman-Al F, Dagci H, Yoshikawa H, Kurt O, Demirel M. A possible link between subtype 2 and asymptomatic infections of Blastocystis hominis. Parasitol Res. 2008;103(3):685–9.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  43. Dominguez-Marquez MV, Guna R, Munoz C, Gomez-Munoz MT, Borras R. High prevalence of subtype 4 among isolates of Blastocystis hominis from symptomatic patients of a health district of Valencia (Spain). Parasitol Res. 2009;105(4):949–55.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  44. Yoshikawa H, Wu Z, Pandey K, Pandey BD, Sherchand JB, Yanagi T, Kanbara H. Molecular characterization of Blastocystis isolates from children and rhesus monkeys in Kathmandu, Nepal. Vet Parasitol. 2009;160(3-4):295–300.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  45. Meloni D, Sanciu G, Poirier P, El Alaoui H, Chabe M, Delhaes L, et al. Molecular subtyping of Blastocystis sp. isolates from symptomatic patients in Italy. Parasitol Res. 2011;109(3):613–9.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  46. Yakoob J, Jafri W, Jafri N, Khan R, Islam M, Beg MA, Zaman V. Irritable bowel syndrome: in search of an etiology: role of Blastocystis hominis. Am J Trop Med Hyg. 2004;70(4):383–5.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  47. Yakoob J, Jafri W, Beg MA, Abbas Z, Naz S, Islam M, Khan R. Irritable bowel syndrome: is it associated with genotypes of Blastocystis hominis. Parasitol Res. 2010;106(5):1033–8.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  48. Stensvold CR, Christiansen DB, Olsen KE, Nielsen HV. Blastocystis sp. subtype 4 is common in Danish Blastocystis-positive patients presenting with acute diarrhea. Am J Trop Med Hyg. 2011;84(6):883–5.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  49. Lee IL, Tan TC, Tan PC, Nanthiney DR, Biraj MK, Surendra KM, Suresh KG. Predominance of Blastocystis sp. subtype 4 in rural communities, Nepal. Parasitol Res. 2012;110(4):1553–62.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  50. Petrasova J, Uzlikova M, Kostka M, Petrzelkova KJ, Huffman MA, Modry D. Diversity and host specificity of Blastocystis in syntopic primates on Rubondo Island, Tanzania. Int J Parasitol. 2011;41(11):1113–20.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  51. Motazedian H, Ghasemi H, Sadjjadi SM. Genomic diversity of Blastocystis hominis from patients in southern Iran. Ann Trop Med Parasitol. 2008;102(1):85–8.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  52. Puthia MK, Vaithilingam A, Lu J, Tan KS. Degradation of human secretory immunoglobulin A by Blastocystis. Parasitol Res. 2005;97(5):386–9.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  53. Jones MS, Whipps CM, Ganac RD, Hudson NR, Boorom K. Association of Blastocystis subtype 3 and 1 with patients from an Oregon community presenting with chronic gastrointestinal illness. Parasitol Res. 2009;104(2):341–5.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  54. Jimenez-Gonzalez DE, Martinez-Flores WA, Reyes-Gordillo J, Ramirez-Miranda ME, Arroyo-Escalante S, Romero-Valdovinos M, et al. Blastocystis infection is associated with irritable bowel syndrome in a Mexican patient population. Parasitol Res. 2012;110(3):1269–75.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  55. Vogelberg C, Stensvold CR, Monecke S, Ditzen A, Stopsack K, Heinrich-Grafe U, Pohlmann C. Blastocystis sp. subtype 2 detection during recurrence of gastrointestinal and urticarial symptoms. Parasitol Int. 2010;59(3):469–71.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright

© The Author(s). 2017

Comments

By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.

Advertisement