Skip to content

Advertisement

Parasites & Vectors

What do you think about BMC? Take part in

Open Access

Identification of immunogenic proteins of the cysticercoid of Hymenolepis diminuta

  • Anna Sulima1,
  • Justyna Bień2,
  • Kirsi Savijoki3,
  • Anu Näreaho4,
  • Rusłan Sałamatin1, 5,
  • David Bruce Conn6, 7 and
  • Daniel Młocicki1, 2Email author
Parasites & Vectors201710:577

https://doi.org/10.1186/s13071-017-2519-4

Received: 17 July 2017

Accepted: 1 November 2017

Published: 21 November 2017

Abstract

Background

A wide range of molecules are used by tapeworm metacestodes to establish successful infection in the hostile environment of the host. Reports indicating the proteins in the cestode-host interactions are limited predominantly to taeniids, with no previous data available for non-taeniid species. A non-taeniid, Hymenolepis diminuta, represents one of the most important model species in cestode biology and exhibits an exceptional developmental plasticity in its life-cycle, which involves two phylogenetically distant hosts, arthropod and vertebrate.

Results

We identified H. diminuta cysticercoid proteins that were recognized by sera of H. diminuta-infected rats using two-dimensional gel electrophoresis (2DE), 2D-immunoblotting, and LC-MS/MS mass spectrometry. Proteomic analysis of 42 antigenic spots revealed 70 proteins. The largest number belonged to structural proteins and to the heat-shock protein (HSP) family. These results show a number of the antigenic proteins of the cysticercoid stage, which were present already in the insect host prior to contact with the mammal host. These are the first parasite antigens that the mammal host encounters after the infection, therefore they may represent some of the molecules important in host-parasite interactions at the early stage of infection.

Conclusions

These results could help in understanding how H. diminuta and other cestodes adapt to their diverse and complex parasitic life-cycles and show universal molecules used among diverse groups of cestodes to escape the host response to infection.

Keywords

Hymenolepis diminuta Immunogenic proteinsMass spectrometryTwo-dimensional electrophoresis

Background

Diseases caused by tapeworms are widespread globally, may influence human and animal health, and have a strong economic impact. In South America, Asia, and sub-Saharan Africa, human infections with Echinococcus spp. are common [1], whereas infections by Taenia spp., Diphyllobothrium latum and some of the other cestode species that infect humans are endemic in other regions of world as well [2, 3]. In addition to these highly pathogenic species, there are also cases of human infection with low-pathogenic tapeworms such as Hymenolepis diminuta. Human H. diminuta hymenolepiasis is a globally widespread zoonotic infection known to be endemic in Asia, southern and eastern Europe, Central and South America, and Africa [4]. Typically, H. diminuta parasitizes the small intestine of rodents (mostly mice and rats) but occasionally it infects humans [5, 6]. Most of the reported cases have been documented from children [79]. Intermediate hosts for this parasite are beetles, Tribolium spp. and Tenebrio spp. [6], in which the cysticercoid stage develops. The cysticercoid, as an invasive stage of the tapeworm, enters the rat or human body through the consumption of infected insects, either directly or via contaminated water or food. When it reaches small intestine, it undergoes maturation into the adult stage. As either rat or human may serve as a definitive host for H. diminuta, this species represents an interesting model in studies focused on the mechanisms of infection.

Better understanding of a parasite’s adaptations to its way of life and the complexity of interactions between the parasite and the host is possible by introduction of modern techniques of proteomic and genomic research [1013]. Proteomic studies of helminths have shown new aspects in the parasite-host interrelations involving selected species of tapeworms Echinococcus granulosus [1419], Echinococcus multilocularis [20, 21] and Taenia solium [22, 23].

To the best of our knowledge, proteomic studies of cestodes have been conducted exclusively on species developing in mammal host tissues (rats, sheep, humans) under the influence of the host immune system during the period of their differentiation from the hexacanth to metacestode. Metacestodes developing in mammalian hosts (e.g. the taeniids mentioned above) evolved immune-evading strategies when exposed to the presence of host molecules in all of their life-cycle stages, both in the intermediate and definitive host. It is unknown whether similar mechanisms are also present in those cestode species that have invertebrates in their life-cycle. Hymenolepis diminuta seems to be a perfect model to explore whether a tapeworm needs to cope with an invertebrate intermediate and the mammalian definitive hosts in different ways [6, 24, 25]. This will help in understanding how H. diminuta and other cestodes adapt to their diverse and complex parasitic life-cycles.

In this study, we identified H. diminuta cysticercoid proteins that were recognized by the sera of H. diminuta-infected rats. These results show a number of the antigenic proteins of the cysticercoid stage, which were present already in the invertebrate host, without the influence of the mammal host. This study reports on the potential parasite somatic antigens that are encountered by the mammalian host upon infection.

Methods

Collection of Hymenolepis diminuta cysticercoids

Cysticercoids of H. diminuta were isolated from dissected intermediate hosts, Tenebrio molitor beetles, 6 weeks after infection, under a dissecting microscope. Cysticercoids were washed 5 times with 100 mM PBS (phosphate buffered saline) to remove debris. Before protein extraction and proteomic analysis cysticercoids were stored at -80 °C.

Isolation of proteins

After thawing, H. diminuta cysticercoids were again extensively washed three times in PBS (100 mM) and then mixed with lysis buffer (8 M Urea, 4% CHAPS, 40 mM Tris-base, supplemented with protease inhibitor cocktail; Roche, Berlin, Germany) to solubilize protein components. Then the protein mixture was homogenized in a glass Potter-homogenizer and disintegrated by sonication. The lysis solution was clarified by centrifugation at 14,000× rpm for 15 min in an Eppendorf microcentrifuge. Concentration of proteins was measured using the Spectrometer ND-1000 UV/Vis (NanoDrop Technologies, Wilmington, USA). Proteins were kept at -80 °C for further analysis.

Two-dimensional gel electrophoresis (2DE) and 2DE-immunoblotting

To optimize the conditions for 2DE separation, the first-dimension protein separation was first conducted in the pH range of 3–10 using IPG strips (Bio-Rad, Hercules, USA). We observed that cysticercoid proteins were located in pH 4–7 (results not shown), therefore further separations were performed using IPG strips with pH 4–7 (Bio-Rad, Hercules, USA). The mixture of proteins (approximately 150 μg) were rehydrated overnight in 250 μl of rehydration solution (ReadyPrep™ 2-D Rehydration Buffer, BioRad) and loaded onto a pH 3–10 and pH 4–7 IPG strip for the first-dimension separation. Isoelectric focusing (IEF) was performed using a Protean IEF Cell (Bio-Rad) at 20 °C as follows: 15 min at 250 V, then rapid ramping to 4000 V for 2 h, and 4000 V for 16,000 Vh (using a limit of 50 μA/strip). After IEF, the strips were first equilibrated for 25 min in equilibration buffer (ReadyPrep™ 2-D Starter Kit Equilibration Buffer I, Bio-Rad), followed by a 25 min equilibration in the same buffer supplemented with 2.5% iodoacetamide (ReadyPrep™ 2-D Starter Kit Equilibration Buffer II). The second dimension, SDS-PAGE, was run on 12% polyacrylamide gel in the Midi-Protean Tera Cell (Bio-Rad, USA) with 200 V, for approximately 45 min. All gels were run in the same conditions.

Sera samples were collected four weeks after infection from male Lewis rats, infected with H. diminuta at age of about 3 months. Sera samples taken before the infection at day 0 were used as a negative control.

After 2DE, the gels were silver-stained using the Silver Staining Kit according to the manufacturer’s protocol (Krzysztof Kucharczyk Techniki Elektroforetyczne, Warsaw, Poland) or used without staining for 2DE immunoblotting. Further analyses were done using repetitive silver stained gels (> 90% of coverage). Gels were scanned with a GS-800 densitometer (Bio-Rad) and analyzed using Quantity One and PDQuest Analysis Software (Bio-Rad).

For immunoblotting, proteins were transferred by a wet transfer system (Bio-Rad) to a nitrocellulose membrane (Bio-Rad) that was then treated with antisera diluted 1:500 (from experimentally H. diminuta-infected rats) and then with anti-rat IgG-conjugated to horseradish peroxidase (1:8000, Sigma-Aldrich, Louis, USA). The blots were developed using the SuperSignal West Pico Chemiluminescent Substrate (ThermoFisher Scientific, Waltham, USA) according to the manual, and visualized using GS-800 Densitometer (Bio-Rad) combined with 1-D Analysis Software Quantity 1 (Bio-Rad). The experiment was performed using four biological replicate samples. The imaging of the membrane revealed antigenic spots, of which 42 were selected for mass spectrometry identification.

LC-MS/MS identification and bioinformatics

Spots excised manually from the silver-stained gels were subjected to standard ‘in-gel digestion’ procedure, in which they were first dried with acetonitrile (ACN) and then subjected to reduction, alkylation, and trypsin digestion (for details see Kordan et al. [26]). Briefly, reduction was done with 10 mM DTT in 100 mM NH4HCO3 for 30 min at 57 °C. Cysteines were then alkylated with 0.5 M iodoacetamide in 100 mM NH4HCO3 (45 min in dark at room temperature) and proteins were digested overnight with 10 ng/μl trypsin in 25 mM NH4HCO3, pH 8.5 (Promega, Madison, WI, USA) at 37 °C. Resulting peptides were extracted in a solution containing 0.1% formic acid and 2% ACN (for details see Kordan et al. [26]).

The tryptic peptides were subjected to liquid chromatography and tandem mass spectrometry (LC-MS/MS) in the Laboratory of Mass Spectrometry, Institute of Biochemistry and Biophysics, Polish Academy of Sciences (Warsaw, Poland). Samples were concentrated and desalted on a RP-C18 pre-column (Waters, Milford, USA), and further peptide separation was achieved on a nano-ultra performance liquid chromatography (UPLC) RP-C18 column (Waters, BEH130 C18 column, 75 μm i.d., 250 mm long) of a nanoACQUITY UPLC system, using a 45-min linear acetonitrile gradient. Column outlet was directly coupled to the Electrospray ionization (ESI) ion source of the Orbitrap Velos type mass spectrometer (Thermo Scientific, Waltham, USA), working in the regime of data dependent MS to MS/MS switch with HCD type peptide fragmentation. An electrospray voltage of 1.5 kV was used. Raw data files were pre-processed with Mascot Distiller software (version 2.5, MatrixScience). The obtained peptide masses and fragmentation spectra were matched with the National Center for Biotechnology Information (NCBI) non-redundant database NCBInr 20160525 (88,005,140 sequences; 32,294,985,422 residues), with a Cestoda filter using the Mascot search engine (Mascot Server v. 2.4.1, MatrixScience). The following search parameters were applied: enzyme specificity was set to trypsin, peptide mass tolerance to ± 20 ppm, and fragment mass tolerance to ± 0.1 Da. The search criteria for the Mascot searches were trypsin digestion with one missed cleavage allowed, carbamidomethyl modification of cysteine as a fixed modification, and oxidation of methionine as a variable modification.

Multidimensional protein Identification Technology - type (MudPIT-type) and/or the highest number of peptide sequences, were selected. The expected value threshold of 0.05 was used for analysis, which means that all peptide identifications had a less than 1 in 20 chance of being a random match. Spectra derived from silver-stained gel pieces usually do not contain enough MS/MS fragmentations to calculate a meaningful FDR, therefore a Mascot score threshold of 30 or above (depending on the value given by Mascot) was used. Classification of the identified proteins was based on Gene Ontology molecular function, biological process, and cellular component information available from the UniProtKB database (http://www.uniprot.org/) and QuickGO (http://www.ebi.ac.uk/QuickGO/).

We used SignalP 4.1 server to predict the presence and location of signal peptide cleavage sites in amino acid sequences in identified proteins of H. diminuta. The method incorporates a prediction of cleavage sites and a signal peptide/non-signal peptide prediction based on a combination of several artificial neural networks as described by Nielsen [27].

Results

2DE (two-dimensional gel electophoresis) analysis of cysticercoid proteins of H. diminuta

We detected more than 540 protein spots in the proteome of the H. diminuta cysticercoids, with a pH range of 4–7 and Mw (molecular weight) of 10–250 kDa. Figure 1 represents one of the four replicate silver-stained proteome gels used in further analyses.
Fig. 1

Silver-stained 2-DE protein maps of Hymenolepis diminuta cysticercoid protein spots. Cysticercoid proteins were separated on a linear pH range of 4–7 by using IEF in the first dimension and 12% SDS-PAGE in the second dimension. Antigenic protein spots are indicated by red colour

2DE-immunoblot (two-dimensional immunoblotting) revealed that 42 spots were positively recognized by the H. diminuta-infected rat sera (Fig. 2). All of these spots were successfully identified using LC-MS/MS. As shown in Fig. 2, potentially immunogenic proteins migrated predominantly with a Mw between 55 and 250 kDa. However, a limited number of spots containing antigenic proteins were also observed in the area between 25 and 55 kDa. The proteins were organized in six groups of horizontally adjacent immunorective spots. The first group includes spots labelled 2 to 9 in Fig. 2. The second group of spots is from 10 to 15. Spots 16–20 belong to the third group, whereas 25–28 belong to the fourth. Spots 32 and 33 the fifth group, and 34 to 36 is the sixth.
Fig. 2

Recognition pattern of H. diminuta cysticercoid antigens by antibodies of H. diminuta-infected rats. The nitrocellulose membrane shows cysticercoid immunogenic protein spots visualized using SuperSignal West Pico Chemiluminescent Substrate (ThermoFisher Scientific, USA) combined with Quantity One 1-D Analysis Software (Bio-Rad, USA)

LC-MS/MS identification of cysticercoid antigenic proteins H. diminuta

The 42 protein spots were subjected to in-gel tryptic digestion and an equal amount of peptides was subjected to LC-MS/MS analysis. We identified 70 potentially antigenic proteins (Table 1). As no whole-genome/proteome database is yet available for H. diminuta, protein identification in the present study was conducted against protein sequences available for other cestode species. Several proteins were identified from multiple spots (Additional file 1: Table S1) with differing pI and MW values, suggesting that the proteins in question have undergone post-translational modification (proteolysis or charged modification). Most of the analyzed spots contained more than one protein, e.g. a relatively high number of proteins were identified from spots number 30 and 32 (10 proteins), 35 (11 proteins), 38 (17 proteins), 39 (16 proteins) and 41 (13 proteins). However, most spots taken into consideration contained less than 3–4 proteins. Proteins that appeared to be most frequently identified from multiple spots are: actin cytoplasmic 2 (14 spots), hypothetical transcript (12 spots), procollagen-lysine 2-oxoglutarate 5-dioxygenase (8 spots), and type II collagen B (16 spots) (Table 1). We also noticed the presence of individual proteins identified only in selected spots (Table 1). Most identified proteins are structural and heat-shock family proteins, and selected potentially antigenic proteins are enzymes e.g. belonging to the cysteine proteases family (Table 1, Additional file 1: Table S1). The highly cross-reactive protein spots matched type II collagen B, hypothetical transcript and collagen alpha-1 (XXVII) chain, actin, myosin heavy chain, procollagen-lysine 2-oxoglutarate 5-dioxygenase, HSP3 family member, and tubulin alpha-1C chain (Table 1, Additional file 1: Table S1). The molecular weight of the aforementioned protein spots ranged between 55 and 250 kDa. The spots 37–42 (Fig. 2) with MWs ranging from 25 to 55 kDa and pH from 5 to 6, we found to contain 5 proteins, such as tubulin beta-2C chain, HSP 70, small HSP, actin, and major egg antigen.
Table 1

Alphabetical list of identified cysticercoid antigenic proteins with spot numbers and recognition of potentially signaling/secretory proteins

Protein name

Spot number (Number of spots)

Signal proteina

26S protease regulatory subunit 6A (Echinococcus granulosus)

38, 39 (2)

NO

26S protease regulatory subunit 7 (Echinococcus granulosus)

38 (1)

NO

78 kDa glucose-regulated protein

32, 38 (2)

YES

Actin, cytoplasmic 2 (Echinococcus granulosus)

8, 10, 11, 20, 24, 27, 29, 30, 31, 35, 38, 39, 40, 41 (14)

NO

Actin, partial (Diphyllobothrium dendriticum)

2, 11, 37, 42 (4)

NO

Actin-1

40, 41 (2)

NO

Actin-2

10, 39, 40, 41 (4)

NO

Actin-5

40, 41 (2)

NO

Actin-6

2, 10, 26, 31 (4)

NO

Annexin A7 (Echinococcus granulosus)

42 (1)

NO

Apolipoprotein A I binding protein (Hymenolepis microstoma)

36 (1)

NO

ATP dependent RNA helicase Ddx1 (Hymenolepis microstoma)

22 (1)

NO

ATP dependent RNA helicase DDX31 (Hymenolepis microstoma)

38, 41 (2)

NO

Beta tubulin (Hymenolepis microstoma)

37, 38, 41, 37 (4)

NO

Beta-tubulin isoform 2, partial (Echinococcus granulosus)

37 (1)

NO

Calpain A (Hymenolepis microstoma)

30, 34, 35, 36, 37 (5)

NO

Chaperonin containing TCP1 subunit 2 (beta) (Hymenolepis microstoma)

39 (1)

NO

Chaperonin containing TCP1 subunit 5 (epsilon) (Hymenolepis microstoma)

39 (1)

NO

Collagen alpha 1(V) chain (Hymenolepis microstoma)

9, 17, 15 (3)

NO

Collagen alpha 2(I) chain (Hymenolepis microstoma)

15 (1)

YES

Collagen alpha-1(XXVII) chain (Echinococcus granulosus)

1, 6, 7, 23 (4)

YES

Collagen type i ii iii v xi alpha (Echinococcus granulosus)

10, 12, 13, 15 (4)

NO

Dihydrolipoyllysine residue succinyltransferase (Hymenolepis microstoma)

38 (1)

NO

Dihydropyrimidinase 2 (Hymenolepis microstoma)

35 (1)

NO

Elongation factor 1-a, partial (Hymenolepis diminuta)

38 (1)

NO

Filamin (Hymenolepis microstoma)

30, 32, 33, 39, 39 (5)

NO

Glucose regulated protein GRP78 (Spirometra erinaceieuropaei)

32, 33, 42 (3)

YES

Gynecophoral canal protein (Hymenolepis microstoma)

26, 27 (2)

YES

Heat shock 70 kDa protein, partial (Mesocestoides corti)

29, 30, 38, 41 (4)

NO

Heat shock cognate 70 kDa protein

42 (1)

NO

Heat shock cognate protein (Echinococcus granulosus)

41 (1)

NO

Heat shock protein 60 (Echinococcus multilocularis)

34 (1)

NO

Heat shock protein 70 (Hymenolepis microstoma)

29, 30 (2)

NO

Heat Shock protein family member (hsp 3) (Hymenolepis microstoma)

32, 33(2)

YES

Hypothetical transcript (Hymenolepis microstoma)

3, 4, 5, 30, 31, 34, 35, 38, 39, 40, 41, 42 (12)

NO

Lamin dm0 (Hymenolepis microstoma)

38 (1)

NO

Lysosomal alpha glucosidase (Hymenolepis microstoma)

25 (1)

YES

Major egg antigen (p40) (Hymenolepis microstoma)

39 (1)

NO

Mitochondrial ATP synthase (Spirometra erinaceieuropaei)

41 (1)

NO

Mitochondrial processing peptidase beta subunit (Hymenolepis microstoma)

38 (1)

NO

Myosin heavy chain (Hymenolepis microstoma)

12, 32, 33, 34, 35 (5)

NO

Myosin heavy chain non muscle (Hymenolepis microstoma)

14, 32, 33, 34 (4)

NO

Myosin heavy chain, striated muscle (Echinococcus granulosus)

12, 32, 35 (3)

NO

Myosin-11 (Echinococcus granulosus)

32, 33, 34, 35 (4)

NO

NADP dependent malic enzyme (Hymenolepis microstoma)

38 (1)

NO

Nuclear pore complex protein Nup205 (Hymenolepis microstoma)

29 (1)

NO

Paramyosin (Hymenolepis microstoma)

32 (1)

NO

Phosphoenolpyruvate carboxykinase (Hymenolepis microstoma)

29, 30, 36 (3)

NO

Procollagen lysine 2-oxoglutarate 5-dioxygenase (Hymenolepis microstoma)

24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31 (8)

YES

Putative cyclin-H (Echinococcus granulosus)

42 (1)

NO

Putative HSP20 related protein (Echinococcus multilocularis)

39 (1)

NO

Radixin (Hymenolepis microstoma)

36 (1)

NO

Retinoblastoma binding protein 4 (Hymenolepis microstoma)

37 (1)

NO

Small heat-shock protein (Taenia solium)

39 (1)

NO

Spectrin alpha actinin (Hymenolepis microstoma)

34, 35 (2)

NO

Spectrin alpha chain (Echinococcus granulosus)

32, 33, 41 (3)

NO

Spectrin beta chain (Hymenolepis microstoma)

27 (1)

NO

Stomatin protein 2 (Hymenolepis microstoma)

39 (1)

NO

Stress-70 protein (Echinococcus granulosus)

29, 30 (2)

NO

Succinate coenzyme A ligase, GDP forming, beta subunit (Hymenolepis microstoma)

38 (1)

NO

Succinyl-CoA ligase (GDP-forming) subunit beta (Echinococcus granulosus)

38 (1)

NO

Talin-1 (Echinococcus granulosus)

36 (1)

NO

Transforming growth factor-beta-induced protein ig-h3 (Echinococcus granulosus)

25, 26, 27 (3)

YES

Tubulin (Spirometra erinaceieuropaei)

35 (1)

NO

Tubulin alpha-1C chain (Echinococcus granulosus)

34, 35 (2)

NO

Tubulin beta 1 chain (Hymenolepis microstoma)

37, 39, 40, 41 (4)

NO

Tubulin beta 2C chain (Hymenolepis microstoma)

37, 38, 39 (3)

NO

Tubulin beta-2 chain

38, 40, 42 (3)

NO

Tubulin beta-3 chain

39 (1)

NO

Type II collagen B (Echinococcus multilocularis)

1, 2, 4, 6, 8, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 33, 35 (16)

NO

aThe presence of secretory/signal proteins predicted with the use of SignalP 4.1 Server software; YES, potentially secretory protein; NO, negative search result

Gene ontology (GO) of the potentially antigenic proteins of H. diminuta cysticercoid

Antigenic proteins identified were grouped according to molecular function (60 proteins), cellular component (41 proteins), and biological process (33 proteins) (Figs. 34 and 5).
Fig. 3

Identified cysticercoid antigenic proteins categorized by their molecular functions according to gene ontology (GO) information obtained from UniProtKB and QuickGO databases

Fig. 4

Identified cysticercoid antigenic proteins categorized by their biological processes according to gene ontology (GO) information obtained from UniProtKB and QuickGO databases

Fig. 5

Identified cysticercoid antigenic proteins categorized by their cellular component category according to gene ontology (GO) information obtained from UniProtKB and QuickGO databases

Eighteen subcategories were assigned to molecular functions (Additional file 1: Table S2). Most of the assigned molecular functions were associated with: small molecule binding (GO:0036094; 40), organic cyclic compound binding (GO:0097159; 39), carbohydrate derivative binding (GO:0097367; 38), and heterocyclic compound binding (GO:1901363; 39). Altogether 10 cysticercoid proteins have unknown molecular functions.

Biological processes were associated with thirteen subcategories. A large number of potentially antigenic proteins were related to primary metabolic processes (GO:0044238; 12), organic substance metabolic processes (GO:0071704; 13), cellular processes (GO:0009987; 24), single-organism processes (GO:0044699; 16), and cellular component organization or biogenesis (GO:0071840; 12). Among 70 identified proteins, 37 had no established/described biological process (Additional file 1: Table S2).

Cellular components were classified into twelve subcategories (Additional file 1: Table S2). Most of the proteins were classified to cell (GO:0005623; 35), cell parts (GO:0044464; 35), and organelles (GO:0043226; 26). For 29 of the 70 cysticercoid proteins, we were unable to establish an associated cellular component.

With the use of SignalP 4.1 server we were able to predict which of the identified H. diminuta proteins are potentially secretory/signal molecules. We predicted the presence of nine potentially secretory/signal proteins. The results of this analysis are shown in Table 1.

Discussion

Altogether 70 potentially antigenic proteins were identified in this study via a combination of classical 2DE and immunoblot techniques. Our results show that among cysticercoid proteins of H. diminuta, there are also proteins previously noticed as antigens or proteins being involved in mechanisms of host immune evasion and/or immune modulation in other helminths such as: actin, calpain, HSP70 and HSP60, major egg antigen, myosin, paramyosin [14, 19, 21, 28, 29]; however, we also pointed out some molecules with roles in parasite-host crosstalk that have never been considered in cestodes (e.g. procollagen, collagens, RBBP). Recent data proved that adult H. diminuta tapeworms effectively modulate the host immune system [3032]; however, nothing is known about immunomodulatory and antigenic properties of its metacestodes.

Since our study focuses on the somatic proteins of the cysticercoid taken directly from the intermediate host, future experiments will include experimental infection of rats and proteome and secretome analysis of the juvenile H. diminuta tapeworms taken directly form rat intestines soon after establishment. This would provide us with the whole view on the mechanisms involved during the early infection.

Among the proteins identified by us, most are components of the cytoskeleton or muscle system, including extracellular matrices; however, we also noticed molecules involved in metabolic processes, e.g. detoxification. These categories include the majority of proteins already described as modulators of the host-parasite relationships in helminths, as those are preferentially ‘seen’ by the host during infection. Several proteins classified as structural or metabolic are known to play key roles during the process of invasion [22]. Cytoskeleton proteins were highly expressed in cysticercoids of H. diminuta. The presence of actin, tubulin, myosin, and paramyosin has been described in the metacestodes of E. granulosus causing hydatid disease, and in adult tapeworms as exhibiting antigenic properties [14, 33]. Upregulation of cytoskeleton proteins may be characteristic for the metacestode juvenile worms [34]. Based on our data, we suggest that the higher expression of cytoskeleton proteins in juvenile worms may indicate their role in the active motility of cestodes and in the morphological change from metacestodes and pre-strobilated juveniles to adults, especially in the formation of proglottids. It is possible that upregulation in the expression of cytoskeletal proteins occurs as a consequence of intensive cell proliferation during the differentiation of the H. diminuta cysticercoid into the adult parasite and as a response to host immunity. The increased expression levels and the rapid growth of the parasite may expose cytoskeletal proteins to the host immune system and therefore structural proteins of H. diminuta were found to be immunogenic [35]. The same could be true for alpha- and beta-tubulins, which are components of microtubules involved in cell division, motility, and polarity. Beta-tubulin is also a target for commonly used benzimidazole anthelmintics [36]. Simultaneous presence of both structural and stress-related proteins in H. diminuta may be associated with complex and constant influence of the host immune system and damage repair. The balanced interplay between structural and stress molecules is probably one of the survival factors adapted by parasites during coevolution with their hosts. Damage repair might explain the high number of structural and stress-related proteins observed in cestode immature stages, including cysticercoids of H. diminuta.

Paramyosin is one of the interesting proteins identified in cysticercoids of H. diminuta. It is very immunogenic and has been proposed to protect invading helminths from immune attack by ‘decoy’ binding proteins of the complement pathway [22]. Paramyosin was identified at the helminths’ surface or in their secretome, and is believed to represent multifunctional modulators of the host immune response [15].

Cytoskeletal and heat-shock proteins (HSPs) were identified as immunodominant among the identified antigens in protoscoleces of E. multilocularis [21]. Immunoblotting has demonstrated that cytoskeletal and HSP proteins are also present in the secretome of adult H. diminuta [35]. Indeed, our results show that in H. diminuta cysticercoids, heat-shock proteins (HSP60, HSP70, HSP20, HSP3, sHSP) are represented as one of the dominant protein families. The HSP family has been previously studied as a potential vaccine candidate [37] similar to calpain, another important protein considered as a vaccine candidate [33, 38], which was also present in several immunoreactive spots of H. diminuta cysticercoids.

In Schistosoma japonicum, HSP70 was shown to induce an early humoral immune response and may be a good target for immunodiagnosis [39], whereas in adult Trichinella spiralis HSP70 underscores its potential as a vaccine candidate [40]. As HSP70 is believed to play an important role in infection, its presence in the H. diminuta cysticercoid stage may be associated with immunomodulatory activity resulting in successful invasion and survival. Another protein belonging to the HSP family, which was identified from one of the immunoreactive spots of H. diminuta cysticercoids, is HSP60. The most recent study on S. japonicum [41] identified egg-derived HSP60 as a major parasite contributor of regulatory T-cell (Treg) induction among egg antigens [42]. Ben Nouir et al. [43] used monoclonal IgM antibody specific for Strongyloides ratti HSP60 and revealed that vaccination with HSP60 conferred protection to infection in a murine model. In relation to our results, the presence of HSP60 among identified proteins may suggest that H. diminuta promotes molecular mechanisms that induce Treg cells.

Small-HSPs (sHSPs) are considered to be a crucial research focus in the fight against parasitic diseases [44]. sHSPs can induce an immune response in the host, thereby generating potential protection against the disease [44]. However, the information available about their role is still insufficient. The presence of sHSPs in H. diminuta cysticercoids makes this parasite a possible model to be used in future studies on the role of sHSPs in host-parasite systems.

A group of proteins recognized in H. diminuta cysticercoids belongs to collagens. In general, collagens have been classified as proteins carrying antigenic and immunogenic properties [45, 46]. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first study to show potential immunogenicity of collagens forming the metacestode cyst (collagen alpha, procollagen lysine, and collagen B type II). Most probably the collagens detected in metacestodes of H. diminuta constitute the cyst wall of cysticercoids. Lee et al. [47] have described the presence of collagen in the wall of cysts formed by Cysticercus fasciolaris (metacestode of Taenia taeniaeformis) in different organs of wild rats. These authors showed that various types of collagen are engaged in constructing the cysts at different stages. Similarly, collagen was observed in a layer surrounding Taenia solium cysticerci in swine [48]. Mixed types of collagens have also been observed to be moderately distributed within the inflammatory infiltration surrounding cysticerci of the parasite Taenia crassiceps [49]. Taken together, these studies suggest that high immunogenicity of collagens may help to establish the infection.

Apart from structural proteins, molecules engaged in metabolic processes such as phosphoenolpyruvate carboxykinase (PEPCK) were also identified in this study. Protein identification of hydatid cysts and adults of E. granulosus revealed the dominance of paramyosin, actin, and PEPCK in the adult tapeworms. PEPCK proteins are directly involved in a variety of pathways, including the excretory, endocrine, and carbohydrate-metabolism pathways [33].

Other metabolic proteins of the cysticercoid include 78 kDa glucose-regulated protein (GRP-78) and apolipoprotein A-I (ApoA-I). GRP78 is an immunoglobulin member of the HSP70 protein family [50]. It has been found that this protein is an immunodominant antigen in echinococcal disease [51]. The results of research by Yun et al. [52] suggest that GRP78 functions as a molecular chaperone in adapting parasites to the new host environment. Whereas apolipoprotein A-I is the major apolipoprotein of high density lipoproteins (HDL) and has an important role in the regulation of the lipid transport, stability, structure, and metabolism of HDL particles [53]. In addition, ApoA-I was identified as a biomarker of T. solium cysticercosis [54]. Our research shows that ApoAI is a potential antigenic protein recognized by antibodies of infected animals; however, Bernthaler et al. [55] found that EmABP (E. multilocularis apolipoprotein) does not work as a parasite antigen during active infection.

Interestingly, one of the immunogenic proteins characteristic for H. diminuta cyticercoids is the major egg antigen p40 (mp40). In S. mansoni, the major egg antigen p40 (Smp40) is well characterized as an immunogenic protein [56, 57], not only in animal models, as Smp40 has been described as immunogenic in humans [58]. In addition, Abouel-Nour et al. [57] indicated the usefulness of Smp40 as an anti-pathology schistosomal vaccine candidate by decreasing fibrosis and inhibiting granuloma formation. On the other hand, S. japonicum egg antigen p40 (Smj40) can be used as a marker for early diagnosis of schistosomiasis [59]. As such, the potential of mp40 in prevention of diseases caused by tapeworms requires more research.

It has been demonstrated that chronic invasion caused by parasites may become a significant carcinogenesis factor and induce cancer development in host tissues [60]. Recent evidence from one human case indicates that infection with the low-pathogenic tapeworm H. nana, a close relative of H. diminuta, may cause a life-threating situation due to invasion of human tissue by genetically altered tapeworm cells [61]. H. diminuta is a common laboratory model of H. nana infections, therefore information clarifying its interactions with the host may also provide useful details concerning development of parasite-originated malignancies in humans.

We found the presence of retinoblastoma binding protein (RBBP) in the cysticercoid of H. diminuta. Gene pRBBP is one of the most extensively studied tumour-suppressor genes [62]. Since RBBP represents an important tumor suppressor protein, its dysfunction is a key in several human tumors. Moreover, molecular and biological functions of proteins belonging to the RBBP family, such as RBBP6, are associated with carcinogenesis in humans [63]. Therefore, mutations in RBBP genes may result in malignant transformations in metacestode cells. Interestingly, malignant transformations have never been observed in adult cestodes. The efficacy of anthelminthic drugs (e.g. albendazole) against clonal proliferations of tapeworm stem cells is questionable or even ineffective as observed in H. nana [61]. Thus, other tumor proteins noted in cysticercoids and other metacestodes may be considered as potential candidates for anti-invasive helminth cellular proliferation therapies, and diseases caused by metacestodes in general. This may include cysticerci and hydatid cysts of taeniids. However, additional data on the presence and expression level of RBBP genes is essential to assess the potential use of anti-RBP therapies in cestode-malignant transformations in human host tissues.

Conclusions

To our knowledge, the present study represents the first identification of the antigenic proteins of the metacestode form of a non-taeniid cestode H. diminuta. Many of the immunogenic proteins recognized, are known to be associated with the immunomodulation of the host in response to infection. Cysticercoids of H. diminuta are armed with mechanisms known from other parasitic helminths invading tissues of mammals, and the identified proteins are known to play crucial roles in host-parasite interactions. The results suggest that the similarities observed in the morphology and composition of the neodermatan tegument (myosins, actins, radixin, spectrin, tubulins, filamins) provoke an immune response of the host. In response to the host’s reaction, H. diminuta cysticercoids evolved immunomodulatory molecules (paramyosin, HSPs, sHSPs, GRP78), which are considered to be engaged in preventing parasite expulsion from the host and guaranteeing successful invasion and long-term survival. However, to clarify the roles of the individual proteins in host-parasite interactions, mechanisms of invasion, and survival strategies, additional experiments and experimental infections should be performed. These should involve detailed and multidisciplinary approaches in analysis of proteomes, secretomes and cestode exosomes in cysticercoid and other juvenile stages of the parasite.

Abbreviations

2DE: 

Two-dimensional electrophoresis

Apo-AI: 

Apolipoprotein AI

DTT: 

1,4-Dithiothreitol

GO: 

Gene ontology

GRP78: 

78 kDa glucose-regulated protein

HDL: 

High density lipoproteins

HSP: 

Heat shock protein

IEF: 

Isoelectric focusing

IPG: 

Immobilized pH gradient

LC-MS/MS: 

Liquid chromatography-mass spectrometry/mass spectrometry

MW: 

Molecular weight

PEPCK: 

Phosphoenolpyruvate carboxykinase

RBBP: 

Retinoblastoma binding protein

SDS-PAGE: 

Sodium dodecyl sulfate polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis

UPLC: 

Ultra performance liquid chromatography.

Declarations

Acknowledgements

The equipment used for protein identification by LC-MS/MS analysis was sponsored in part by the Centre for Preclinical Research and Technology (CePT), a project co-sponsored by the European Regional Development Fund and Innovative Economy, The National Cohesion Strategy of Poland.

Funding

Financial support for this study was provided by the National Science Centre Poland (grant 2012/05/B/NZ6/00769).

Availability of data and materials

The datasets supporting the conclusions of this article are included within the article and its additional files.

Authors’ contributions

DM supervised the work and all the proteomic features and helped to draft the manuscript. AN, AS, DM, JB and KS conceived and designed the experiments. DM and AS carried out the acquisition of the material, analyzed the data and drafted the manuscript. AS, JB and DM conceived and carried out the immunological study with rats. DM and JB has supported AS in all the laboratory analysis. KS has supported AS and DM in all mass spectrometry data analyses. AN, DBC, JB, KS and RS participated the writing and final editing of the manuscript. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Ethics approval and consent to participate

All experimental procedures used in the present study had been pre-approved by the 3rd Local Ethical Committee for Scientific Experiments on Animals in Warsaw, Poland (resolution No. 51/2012, 30th of May 2012).

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.

Authors’ Affiliations

(1)
Department of General Biology and Parasitology, Medical University of Warsaw
(2)
Witold Stefański Institute of Parasitology, Polish Academy of Sciences
(3)
Department of Food and Environmental Sciences, University of Helsinki
(4)
Department of Veterinary Biosciences, University of Helsinki
(5)
Department of Medical Parasitology, National Institute of Public Health - National Institute of Hygiene
(6)
One Health Center, Berry College
(7)
Department of Invertebrate Zoology, Museum of Comparative Zoology, Harvard University

References

  1. Moro P, Schantz PM. Echinococcosis: a review. Int J Infect Dis. 2009;13:125–33.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. Cabello FC. Aquaculture and public health. The emergence of diphyllobothriasis in Chile and the world. Rev Med Chil. 2007;135:1064–71.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. Barton Behravesh C, Mayberry LF, Bristol JR, Cardenas VM, Mena KD, Martínez-Ocaña J, et al. Population-based survey of taeniasis along the United States-Mexico border. Ann Trop Med Parasitol. 2008;102:325–33.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. Thompson RC. Neglected zoonotic helminthes Hymenolepis nana, Echinococcus canadensis and Ancylostoma ceylanicum. Clin Microbol Infect. 2015;21:426–32.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  5. McKay DM, Halton DW, Johnston CF, Shaw C, Fairweather I, Buchanan KD. Hymenolepis diminuta: changes in the levels of certain intestinal regulatory peptides in infected C57 mice. Exp Parasitol. 1991;73:15–26.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. Tua WC, Lai SC. Induction of cysteine proteinase in the encapsulation of Hymenolepis diminuta eggs in the American cockroach, Periplaneta americana. J Invertebr Pathol. 2006;92:73–8.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. Mowlavi GH, Mobedi I, Mamishi S, Rezaeian M, Haghi Ashtiani MT, Kashi M. Hymenolepis diminuta (Rodolphi, 1819) infection in a child from Iran. Iran J Public Health. 2008;37:120–2.Google Scholar
  8. Tiwari S, Karuna T, Rautaraya B. Hymenolepis diminuta infection in a child from a rural area a rare case report. J Lab Physicians. 2014;6:58–9.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  9. Watwe S, Dardi CK. Hymenolepis diminuta in a child from rural area Indian. J Pathol Microbiol. 2008;51:149–51.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  10. Tsai IJ, Zarowiecki M, Holroyd N, Garciarrubio A, Sánchez-Flores A, Brooks KL, et al. The genomes of four tapeworm species reveal adaptations to parasitism. Nature. 2013;496(7443):57–63.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  11. Zarowiecki M, Berriman M. What helminth genomes have taught us about parasite evolution. Parasitology. 2015;142(Suppl 1):85–97.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  12. Mutapi F. Helminth parasite proteomics: from experimental models to human infections. Parasitology. 2012;139:1195–204.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  13. van der Ree AM, Mutapi F. The helminth parasite proteome at the host-parasite interface - informing diagnosis and control. Exp Parasitol. 2015;157:48–58.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. Chemale G, van Rossum AJ, Jefferies JR, Barrett J, Brophy PM, Ferreira HB, et al. Proteomic analysis of the larval stage of the parasite Echinococcus granulosus: causative agent of cystic hydatid disease. Proteomics. 2003;3:1633–6.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. Monteneiro KM, de Carvalho MO, Zaha A, Ferreira HB. Proteomic analysis of the Echinococcus granulosus metacestode during infection of its intermediate host. Proteomics. 2010;10:1985–99.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  16. Aziz A, Zhang W, Li J, Loukas A, McManus DP, Mulvenna J. Proteomic analysis of Echinococcus granulosus hydatid cyst fluid from sheep, cattle and humans. J Proteome. 2011;74:1560–72.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  17. Virginio VG, Monteiro KM, Drumond F, de Carvalho MO, Vargas DM, Zaha A, et al. Excretory/secretory products from in vitro-cultured Echinococcus granulosus protoscoleces. Mol Biochem Parasitol. 2012;183:15–22.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. Debarba JA, Monteiro KM, Moura H, Barr JR, Ferreira HB, Zaha A. Identification of newly synthesized proteins by Echinococcus granulosus protoscoleces upon induction of strobilation. PLoS Negl Trop Dis. 2015;9(9):e0004085.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  19. Wang Y, Xiao D, Shen Y, Han X, Zhao F, Li X, et al. Proteomic analysis of the excretory/secretory products and antigenic proteins of Echinococcus granulosus adult worms from infected dogs. BMC Vet Res. 2015;11:119.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  20. Wang Y, Cheng Z, Lu X, Tang C. Echinococcus multilocularis: proteomic analysis of the protoscoleces by two-dimensional electrophoresis and mass spectrometry. Exp Parasitol. 2009;123:162–7.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. Kouguchi H, Matsumoto J, Katoh Y, Suzuki T, Oku Y, Yagi K. Echinococcus multilocularis: two-dimensional western blotting method for the identification and expression analysis of immunogenic proteins in infected dogs. Exp Parasitol. 2010;124:238–43.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. Santivanez SJ, Hernández-González A, Chile N, Oleaga A, Arana Y, Palma S, et al. Proteomic study of activated Taenia solium oncospheres. Mol Biochem Parasitol. 2010;171:32–9.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  23. Nguyen HA, Bae YA, Lee EG, Kim SH, Diaz-Camacho SP, Nawa Y, et al. A novel sigma-like glutathione transferaze of Taenia solium metacestode. Int J Parasitol. 2010;40:1097–105.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. Zhong D, Wang MH, Pai A, Yan G. Transcription profiling of immune genes during parasite infection in susceptible and resistant strains of the flour beetles (Tribolium castaneum). Exp Parasitol. 2013;134:61–7.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  25. Kosik-Bogacka DI, Wojtkowiak-Giera A, Kolasa A, Czernomysy-Furowicz D, Lanocha N, Wandurska-Nowak E, et al. Hymenolepis diminuta: analysis of the expression of toll-like receptor genes (TLR2 and TLR4) in the small and large intestines of rats. Part II Exp Parasitol. 2013;135:437–45.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  26. Kordan W, Malinowska A, Lecewicz M, Wysocki P, Fraser L, Strzeżek J. The structure of platelet-activating factor acetylhydrolase (PAF-AH) isolated from boar seminal plasma and examined using mass spectrometry. Anim Sci Pap Rep. 2007;25:289–95.Google Scholar
  27. Nielsen H. Methods in Molecular Biology. In: Kihara D, editor. Protein Function Prediction: Methods and Protocols. New York: Springer; 2017. p. 59–73.Google Scholar
  28. Näreaho A, Ravanko K, Hölttä E, Sukura A. Comparative analysis of Trichinella spiralis and Trichinella nativa proteins by two-dimensional gel electrophoresis. Parasitol Res. 2006;98:349–54.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  29. Bień J, Näreaho A, Varmanen P, Gozdzik K, Moskwa B, Cabaj W, et al. Comparative analysis of excretory-secretory antigens of Trichinella spiralis and Trichinella britovi muscle larvae by two-dimensional difference gel electrophoresis and immunoblotting. Proteome Sci. 2012;10:10.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  30. Matis CE, Leung G, Reyes JL, Wang A, Sharkey KA, McKay DM. Adoptive transfer of helminth antigen-pulsed dendritic cells protects against the development of experimental colitis in mice. Eur J Immunol. 2015;45:3126–39.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  31. Reyes JL, Lopes F, Leung G, Mancini NL, Matisz CE, Wang A, et al. Treatment with cestode parasite antigens results in recruitment of CCR2+ myeloid cells, the adoptive transfer of which ameliorates colitis. Infect Immun. 2016;84:3471–83.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  32. Zawistowska-Deniziak A, Basałaj K, Strojny B, Młocicki D. New data on human macrophages polarization by Hymenolepis diminuta tapeworm - an in vitro study. Front Immunol. 2017;8:148.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  33. Cui SJ, Xu LL, Zhang T, Xu M, Yao J, Fang CY, et al. Proteomic characterization of larval and adult developmental stages in Echinococcus granulosus reveals novel insight into host-parasite interactions. J Proteome. 2013;84:158–75.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  34. Johnston MJ, Wang A, Catarino ME, Ball L, Phan VC, MacDonald JA, et al. Extracts of the rat tapeworm, Hymenolepis diminuta, suppress macrophage activation in vitro and alleviate chemically induced colitis in mice. Infect Immun. 2010;78:1364–75.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  35. Bień J, Sałamatin R, Sulima A, Savijoki K, Conn DB, Näreaho A, et al. Mass spectrometry analysis of the excretory-secretory (E-S) products of the model cestode Hymenolepis diminuta reveals their immunogenic properties and the presence of new E-S proteins in cestodes. Acta Parasitol. 2016;61:429–42.Google Scholar
  36. Robinson MW, McFerran N, Trudgett A, Hoey L, Fairweather I. A possible model of benzimidazole binding to beta-tubulin disclosed by invoking an inter-domain movement. J Mol Graph Model. 2004;23:275–84.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  37. Colaco CA, Bailey CR, Walker KB, Keeble J. Heat-shock proteins: stimulators of innate and acquired immunity. Biomed Res Int. 2013;2013:461230.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  38. Zhang Y, Taylor MG, Johansen MV, Bickle QD. Vaccination of mice with a cocktail DNA vaccine induces a Th1-type immune response and partial protection against Schistosoma japonicum infection. Vaccine. 2001;20:724–30.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  39. Liu F, Cui SJ, Hu W, Feng Z, Wang ZQ, Han ZG. Excretory/secretory proteome of the adult developmental stage of human blood fluke, Schistosoma japonicum. Mol Cell Proteomics. 2009;8:1236–51.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  40. Yang J, Pan W, Sun X, Zhao X, Yuan G, Sun Q, et al. Immunoproteomic profile of Trichinella spiralis adult worm proteins recognized by early infection sera. Parasit Vectors. 2015;8:20.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  41. Sutkowski N, Sun W, Fernandes D. Antibody immunotherapy targeting the self-tumor antigen nucleolin (VAC5P.1129). J Immunol. 2015;194 Suppl 1:73.Google Scholar
  42. Zhou S, Jin X, Chen X, Zhu J, Xu Z, Wang X, et al. Heat shock protein 60 in eggs specifically induces tregs and reduces liver immunopathology in mice with schistosomiasis japonica. PLoS One. 2015;10:e0139133.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  43. Ben Nouir N, Piédavent M, Osterloh A, Breloer M. Passive immunization with a monoclonal IgM antibody specific for Strongyloides ratti HSP60 protects mice against challenge infection. Vaccine. 2012;30:4971–6.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  44. Pérez-Morales D, Espinoza B. The role of small heat shock proteins in parasites. Cell Stress Chaperones. 2015;20:767–80.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  45. Lynn AK, Yannas IV, Bonfield W. Antigenicity and immunogenicity of collagen. J Biomed Mater Res B Appl Biomater. 2004;71:343–54.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  46. Thomas AH, Edelman ER, Stultz CM. Collagen fragments modulate innate immunity. Exp Biol Med. 2007;232:406–11.Google Scholar
  47. Lee BW, Jeon BS, Kim HS, Kim HC, Yoon BI. Cysticercus fasciolaris infection in wild rats (Rattus norvegicus) in Korea and formation of cysts by remodeling of collagen fibers. J Vet Diagn Investig. 2016;28:263–70.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  48. Alvarez JI, Londoño DP, Alvarez AL, Trujillo J, Jaramillo MM, Restrepo BI. Granuloma formation and parasite disintegration in porcine cysticercosis: comparison with human neurocysticercosis. J Comp Pathol. 2002;127:186–93.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  49. Freitas AA, Moura VB, Irusta VR, Vinaud MC, Oliveira MA, Lino-Júnior RS. IFN-gamma role in granuloma formation in experimental subcutaneous cysticercosis. Exp Parasitol. 2016;168:1–8.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  50. Munro S, Pelham HR. An hsp70-like protein in the ER: identity with the 78 kd glucose-regulated protein and immunoglobulin heavy chain binding protein. Cell. 1986;46:291–300.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  51. Mühlschlegel F, Frosch P, Castro A, Apfel H, Müller A, Frosch M. Molecular cloning and characterization of an Echinococcus multilocularis and Echinococcus granulosus stress protein homologous to the mammalian 78 kDa glucose regulated protein. Mol Biochem Parasitol. 1995;74:245–50.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  52. Yun DH, Bae YA, Chung JY, Kang SY, Kang I, Sohn WM, et al. A 78 kDa glucose-regulated protein gene of Spirometra erinacei plerocercoid induced by chemical and physiological stresses. Parasitology. 2004;129:713–21.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  53. Zannis VI, Kardassis D, Zanni EE. Genetic mutations affecting human lipoproteins, their receptors, and their enzymes. Adv Hum Genet. 1993;21:145–319.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  54. Deckers N, Dorny P, Kanobana K, Vercruysse J, Gonzalez AE, Ward B, et al. Use of ProteinChip technology for identifying biomarkers of parasitic diseases: the example of porcine cysticercosis (Taenia solium). Exp Parasitol. 2008;120:320–9.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  55. Bernthaler P, Epping K, Schmitz G, Deplazes P, Brehm K. Molecular characterization of EmABP, an apolipoprotein A-I binding protein secreted by the Echinococcus multilocularis metacestode. Infect Immun. 2009;77:5564–71.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  56. Stadecker MJ, Hernandez HJ. The immune response and immunopathology in infection with Schistosoma mansoni: a key role of major egg antigen Sm-p40. Parasite Immunol. 1998;20:217–21.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  57. Abouel-Nour MF, Lotfy M, Attallah AM, Doughty BL. Schistosoma mansoni major egg antigen Smp40: molecular modeling and potential immunoreactivity for anti-pathology vaccine development. Mem Inst Oswaldo Cruz. 2006;101:365–372.Google Scholar
  58. Cao M, Chao H, Doughty BL. Cloning of a cDNA encoding an egg antigen homologue from Schistosoma mansoni. Mol Biochem Parasitol. 1993;58:169–71.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  59. Zhou XH, Wu JY, Huang XQ, Kunnon SP, Zhu XQ, Chen XG. Identification and characterization of Schistosoma japonicum Sjp40, a potential antigen candidate for the early diagnosis of schistosomiasis. Diagn Microbiol Infect Dis. 2010;67:337–45.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  60. Herrera LA, Ostrosky-Wegman P. Do helminths play a role in carcinogenesis? Trends Parasitol. 2001;17:172–5.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  61. Muehlenbachs A, Mathison BA, Olson PD. Malignant transformation of Hymenolepis nana in a human host. N Engl J Med. 2016;374:1293–4.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  62. Woitach JT, Zhang M, Niu CH, Thorgeirsson SS. A retinoblastoma-binding protein that affects cell-cycle control and confers transforming ability. Nat Genet. 1998;19:371–4.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  63. Ntwasa M. Retinoblastoma binding protein 6, another p53 monitor. Trends Cancer. 2016;2:635–7.Google Scholar

Copyright

© The Author(s). 2017

Comments

By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.

Advertisement