Skip to content

Advertisement

Parasites & Vectors

Open Access

Genotype and biotype of invasive Anopheles stephensi in Mannar Island of Sri Lanka

  • Sinnathamby N. Surendran1Email author,
  • Kokila Sivabalakrishnan1,
  • Kanapathy Gajapathy1,
  • Sivasingham Arthiyan1,
  • Tibutius T. P. Jayadas1,
  • Kalingarajah Karvannan1,
  • Selvarajah Raveendran2,
  • S. H. P. Parakrama Karunaratne3 and
  • Ranjan Ramasamy4
Parasites & Vectors201811:3

https://doi.org/10.1186/s13071-017-2601-y

Received: 28 September 2017

Accepted: 20 December 2017

Published: 3 January 2018

Abstract

Background

Anopheles stephensi, the major vector of urban malaria in India, was recently detected for the first time in Sri Lanka in Mannar Island on the northwestern coast. Since there are different biotypes of An. stephensi with different vector capacities in India, a study was undertaken to further characterise the genotype and biotype of An. stephensi in Mannar Island.

Methods

Mosquito larvae were collected in Pesalai village in Mannar and maintained in the insectary until adulthood. Adult An. stephensi were identified morphologically using published keys. Identified adult An. stephensi were molecularly characterized using two mitochondrial (cox1 and cytb) and one nuclear (ITS2) markers. Their PCR-amplified target fragments were sequenced and checked against available sequences in GenBank for phylogenetic analysis. The average spiracular and thoracic lengths and the spiracular index were determined to identify biotypes based on corresponding indices for Indian An. stephensi.

Results

All DNA sequences for the Mannar samples matched reported sequences for An. stephensi from the Middle East and India. However, a single nucleotide variation in the cox1 sequence suggested an amino acid change from valine to methionine in the cox1 protein in Sri Lankan An. stephensi. Morphological data was consistent with the presence of the Indian urban vector An. stephensi type-form in Sri Lanka.

Conclusions

The present study provides a more detailed molecular characterization of An. stephensi and suggests the presence of the type-form of the vector for the first time in Sri Lanka. The single mutation in the cox1 gene may be indicative of a founder effect causing the initial diversification of An. stephensi in Sri Lanka from the Indian form. The distribution of the potent urban vector An. stephensi type-form needs to be established by studies throughout the island as its spread adds to the challenge of maintaining the country’s malaria-free status.

Keywords

Anopheles stephensi Biotypecox1 cytb Malaria vectorMannar IslandSpiracular indexSri LankaITS2

Background

Malaria was eliminated from Sri Lanka in 2013 but has probably been endemic in the country since the thirteenth century [1]. However, 36–95 cases of imported malaria per year have been detected in returning residents and visitors to the country after 2013 [1]. Because high densities of many anopheline vectors are present on the island, continuing vigilance to prevent the re-initiation of indigenous malaria transmission from externally acquired infections is therefore necessary. Anopheles culicifacies species E is the established primary vector of malaria in Sri Lanka with An. subpictus, An. sundaicus and An. annularis as secondary vectors together with several other minor vectors [26]. Anopheles stephensi, never previously detected in Sri Lanka [7, 8], was recently identified on the island of Mannar off the northwestern coast of Sri Lanka [9].

Anopheles stephensi is a major malaria vector in the Indian subcontinent and is widely distributed in Asia, being present in India, Pakistan, Afghanistan, Iran, Iraq, Bahrain, Oman and Saudi Arabia in the West to Bangladesh, South China and Myanmar in the East [10, 11]. It is a major vector of urban malaria on the Indian subcontinent and the Middle East [1214].

Although An. stephensi is not considered to be a species complex, three different biotypes have been identified in India namely type, intermediate and mysorensis, based on morphological differences in the number of egg ridges [15, 16], spiracular index [17] cytogenetic characteristics [18, 19], cuticular hydrocarbon profiles [20], as well as through differences in ecological, behavioral and mating characteristics [11]. The type-form is considered to be a vector of urban malaria, while the mysorensis-form is considered to be a poor vector or non-vector due to its zoophagic nature [16]. The vector status of the intermediate form is not well-established.

After the detection of An. stephensi on Mannar Island [9], strict adult and preimaginal vector control measures have been implemented by the Antimalaria Campaign (AMC) to eliminate it and curtail its spread to the mainland. The initial identification of An. stephenisi in Mannar was based on larval and adult morphology and cytochrome oxidase or cox1 sequence [9]. The present study was undertaken to further molecular characterize An. stephensi on Mannar Island using an additional mitochondrial gene cytochrome b (cytb), and the nuclear internally transcribed spacer 2 of ribosomal RNA (ITS2), and also to morphologically characterize the biotypes.

Methods

Study site

Mannar Island lies in the Indian ocean off the Northwestern coast of Sri Lanka in close proximity (c.30 km) to Rameshwaram Island of the state of Tamil Nadu in India (Fig. 1). Mannar and Rameshwaram islands are separated by a shallow region of the Gulf of Mannar called the Palk Strait (Fig. 1) made up of chains of sandbanks and islets. Mannar Island is located within one of the two arid zones of Sri Lanka that receives average rainfall of < 800 mm rain annually (Fig. 1). This contrasts with the average annual rainfall in the wet zone of 2500 mm and the dry zone of <1900 mm and an intermediate zone with mixed characteristics [21]. Larval collections were performed in Pesalai, one of many rural villages of Mannar district where the presence of An. stephensi was first discovered [9]. Fishing is the main occupation in Pesalai.
Fig. 1

The map of a location of Sri Lanka in the Indian Ocean and its four rainfall zones; b location of Mannar Island relative to Tamil Nadu; and c location of the sample collection site Pesalai in Mannar Island

Sample collection and species identification

Anopheline larvae were collected from domestic wells and cement tanks identified as potential habitats for An. stephensi during the dry season months of June-August, 2017 using standard dippers (350 ml). Collected larvae were reared as described previously in the contained insectary conditions of the Department of Zoology, University of Jaffna to reach adulthood [22]. Larvae were maintained under laboratory conditions (28 ± 2 °C, 12 h photoperiodicity and RH ~70%) in the same water from the habitats in which they were collected, in 1.5 l plastic trays with powered fish meal given twice a day as additional food. The emergent adults were identified morphologically as An. stephensi using published keys [7, 23] and used for subsequent molecular characterization and biotype identification.

PCR amplification of target molecular markers

DNA from 25 individuals morphologically identified as An. stephensi was extracted using the DNeasy Blood & Tissue kit (Qiagen, California, USA). The ITS2 region of rDNA was amplified using the 5.8S forward and 28S reverse primers [24]. Regions of the cox1 and cytb genes of mitochondria were amplified by using primers C1-J-1718 and C1-N-2191 [25] and cytbF and cytbR [26], respectively. For each amplification, PCR reactions were performed in a 25 μl volume as described previously [27]. The PCR products were purified using QIAquick® PCR Purification Kit (Qiagen). Purified PCR products of ITS2, cox1, and cytb were sequenced in both directions at the sequencing facility of the University of Peradeniya, Peradeniya, Sri Lanka.

Sequence analysis and phylogenetic analysis

The sequences were edited in Finch TV (Geospiza Inc., Seattle, USA) and aligned with Clustal W in MEGA 5.0 software [28]. The aligned sequences for coding genes were translated into amino acid sequences using the invertebrate mitochondrial codon usage pattern. The amino acid sequences were used to find out the best matching protein in BLASTP of the NCBI. Neighbour-joining trees were created with the best substitution model selected from MEGA 5.0 [28]. For cox1 sequences based phylogenetic analysis the best model selected was Tamura Nei 92 with the rate parameters set at gamma distribution with invariant sites and the Jukes-Cantor model for ITS2 with uniform rate distribution. One thousand nonparametric bootstrap replicates were performed and a consensus tree was constructed. The DNA sequences were submitted in the GenBank database under the accession numbers MF975722–MF975748. The uncorrected Kimura 2-Parameter (K2P) genetic distance [28] was calculated using MEGA 5.0. DNA sequence polymorphism such as number of haplotypes was estimated using DnaSP 5.10 [29].

Biotype identification based on spiracular index

Morphologically identified adult An. stephensi from Pesalai were used for determining their biotype based on the spiracular index as described by Nagpal et al. [17] for Indian An. stephensi type-form and An. stephensi var. mysorensis. Essentially the adults were kept in 10% KOH overnight and the spiracles and thorax were dissected under a binocular dissecting microscope (Kyowa, Kanagawa, Japan) and mounted in Canada balsam. The length of spiracles and thorax were measured using a light microscope (Olympus - CX21, Tokyo, Japan) equipped with ocular and stage micrometers. The spiracular index was calculated (mean spiracular length divided by thoracic length × 100) as described previously [30]. The calculated spiracular index was compared with the reported indices for Indian type- and mysorensis-forms [17] and subjected to a two-tailed Student’s t-test to identify significant differences.

Results

Sample collection and species identification

During the study period, 24 potential habitats (cemented water storage tanks, open wells and domestic wells) were inspected and 11 were found to have mosquito larvae. Collections were limited to larvae from Pesalai due to strict control measures implemented by the regional AMC with the application of Temephos to many larval habitats. Out of the 11 sites with mosquito larvae, 7 sites were found to have a total of 158 anopheline larvae. Of the emergent adults 73 were identified as An. stephensi and the rest as Anopheles varuna. All the 7 preimaginal habitats that contained An. stephensi were domestic wells where the water was used for purposes other than drinking.

DNA sequence analysis

A fragment size of 590 bp sequence was obtained for cox1 and used for analysis with other sequences retrieved from GenBank. A total of nine cox1 sequences were retrieved from GenBank and aligned with ten sequences obtained from the present study. A fragment size of 347 bp sequence of cox1 gene which had maximum hits in the NCBI nucleotide BLASTn search was used for the analysis. The cox1 sequences were free of nuclear gene copies and checked with the reference genome of An. stephensi for consistency. No deletions, insertions or stop codons were observed. This indicates the absence of pseudogenes. All analyzed sequences were overlapping and covered the same region. During the alignment all the sequences available from GenBank, no variations were observed except that four samples (three from the present study GenBank accession numbers MF975729–31 and one from a previous submission MF124611) from Sri Lanka had a single nucleotide variation. The variation was a transition where a G is replaced by an A (Additional file 1: Figure S1). The variation causes a change in the amino acid sequence where valine is replaced by methionine (Additional file 2: Figure S2). The calculated K2P distance among the group was within 0.3 and 0.6%.

Three cox1 haplotypes were identified with the dominant form having fourteen samples (including seven sequences from the current study; GenBank: MF975722–28), another haplotype with four samples (three of the present study; GenBank: MF 975729–31), one from a previously reported sequence from Sri Lanka (GenBank: MF124611) and one with a single sequence of a sample collected from Pondicherry, India (GenBank: DQ310148).

A PCR-amplified 230 bp ITS2 region was analyzed with 15 sequences obtained from GenBank in addition to the 11 sequences from the present study. The ITS2 sequences confirmed the identity of the species with no variation observed among the identified samples from our study. The aligned sequence shows some degree of variation among other sequence reported from Iran, India, Saudi Arabia and Iraq. A total of five haplotypes were identified based on ITS2 sequence data. All the samples from the current study was categorized into one haplotype (MF975738–48), and identical to the Indian sample collected from Tamil Nadu state in India (GenBank: EU359681) [31] whereas the other four haplotypes had one sequence each from India (KT921409), Iran (DQ662409 and AY702485) and one without any location identifier (AY702485). The K2P distance calculated was 0.5 to 27.2% among the group with the sample with the accession number of HQ703001 from India showing greater variation from the others.

A fragment size of 232 bp was generated for cytb sequences and were deposited in GenBank (MF975732–37). The identity of the species was confirmed by the cytb sequence analysis with available sequences in GenBank (AF311254 and KT382827). There were no variations found in the cytb sequences within the Sri Lanka samples and the two sequences (AF311254 and KT382827) deposited in GenBank. The tree analysis for the cytb was not done as there were only two other sequences available in GenBank.

Maximum likelihood tree

The phylogeny trees created using cox1 and ITS2 sequence data are presented in Figs. 2 and 3, respectively. Only one base difference was present within the Sri Lankan group for cox1. The other cox1 sequences also did not vary enough to create separate clades with strong bootstrap values. Instead they are all grouped as a single clade. The phylogenetic analysis based on ITS2 sequence data resulted in 3 separate clades. All except two different sequences were found to be grouped as a single clade. Two from India representing Rajasthan (GenBank: KT921409) and an unknown locality (GenBank: HQ703001) were separated from each other and rest of the samples with strong bootstrap values.
Fig. 2

Phylogenetic tree based on cox1 sequence dataset (347 nt positions) constructed using the maximum likelihood method using Tamura-Nei 92 model with the rate parameters set at gamma distribution with invariant sites; bootstrap values > 63% are shown. The sequences used for analysis include samples from Pesalai (GenBank: MF975722–MF975731) and other GenBank entries. Anopheles culicifacies (GenBank: KF406660) was used as the outgroup

Fig. 3

Phylogenetic tree based on ITS2 sequence dataset (230 nt positions) constructed using the maximum likelihood method using the Jukes-Cantor model; bootstrap values > 50% are shown. The sequences used for analysis include the samples from Pesalai (GenBank: MF975738–MF975748) and other GenBank entries. Anopheles maculatus (GenBank: KJ462218) and An. greeni (GenBank: FJ526585) were used as the outgroup

Identification of biotype

Thirty-two adults emerging from larvae collected in Pesalai were used for determining biotype. The average spiracular length varied between 0.10–0.12 mm and the thoracic length varied between 1.04–1.25 mm. The spiracular index varied between 8.19–10.10. The mean values of spiracular length, thoracic length and spiracular index are shown in Table 1. The analysis based on spiracular index in comparison with the corresponding reported index for Indian samples [17] were consistent with all 32 Pesalai specimens analyzed belonging to type biological form. The Student’s t-test analysis revealed no significant (t(62) = 0.69, P = 0.491) difference between the Indian and Pesalai type-forms and a significant (t(62) = 15.78, P = 0.005) difference between the Indian mysorensis- and Pesalai type-form.
Table 1

Measurements of spiracular length, thoracic length and calculated spiracular index of adult An. stephensi

Country/location

Mean spiracular length (mm)

Mean thoracic length (mm)

Mean spiracular index

Biotype

Pesalai/Sri Lanka

0.11 ± 0.01

1.14 ± 0.06

9.32 ± 0.53a

type

Jodhpur/India [22]

0.12 ± 0.01

1.30 ± 0.08

9.23 ± 0.51a

type

Jodhpur/India [22]

0.10 ± 0.01

1.33 ± 0.05

7.52 ± 0.34

mysorensis

aDifference not statistically significant

Discussion

The recently identified An. stephensi on Mannar Island, Sri Lanka has been now characterized with three different genetic markers. The DNA sequence analysis of the three marker genes showed that An. stephensi collected from Pesalai are genetically identical to each other in the three markers, and that they are related to An. stephensi populations in the Middle East and Indian subcontinent. However, a single nucleotide variation that resulted in an amino acid variation (Val to Met) characteristic to Sri Lankan An. stephensi cox1 subunit is reported here for the first time. This may be indicative of a founder effect resulting from a limited invasion into Mannar. The specimens are unlikely to be derived from eggs from the same blood-fed female as the larvae were collected from seven different wells in Pesalai.

To our knowledge, this is also the first indication that the efficient urban vector biological form of An. stephensi, the type-form, is present in Mannar Island in Sri Lanka. The limitations of the present study were that the samples were collected from a single location and blood-fed adult An. stephensi were not available due to the vector control measures implemented by the AMC throughout Mannar Island. Additional studies on the biotype and genotype may become possible if self-mating colonies of An. stephensi originating in Sri Lanka can be established. Larval collections to determine the presence of An. stephensi in other locations in Sri Lanka also need to be pursued in this context.

Molecular characterization of all three biological forms of Iran using cox1 and cox2 markers revealed high homology in the sequences suggesting extensive gene flow [14]. Similarly in India, the type- and mysorensis-form exhibited sequence similarity in the ribosomal DNA ITS2 and domain-3 [31]. Presence of the three biological forms with sequence identity confirms their taxonomic status and the reported differences in vectorial capacities between biotypes can be attributed to epidemiological factors rather than morphological differences [32]. However, genetic studies based on microsatellite markers revealed the presence of genetic differences and a non-significant low level of gene flow between the three biological forms [33]. Therefore extensive DNA-based studies along with bio-ecological characterizations are needed to establish whether the three forms are genetically distinct populations with different vectorial capacities.

The type-form is reported to be an efficient urban vector responsible for urban malaria in the Indian subcontinent [11]. The type-form specimens were found to develop mainly in overhead tanks, cemented tanks, domestic wells, cisterns, fountains and water collections at construction sites [3436]. However, in contrary to the reports that the type-form is not prevalent in rural environments [11], the type-form found in Pesalai, Sri Lanka, has established its populations in a rural environment to lay eggs and undergo preimaginal development in domestic wells. This adaptation poses a challenge in Sri Lanka as this form of An. stephensi has the potential to transmit malaria in both rural and urban environments, especially in the mainland of North Sri Lanka where almost every household has a domestic well.

The spread of An. stephensi southward in India has been attributed to be the cause for recent outbreaks of malaria in the normally malaria-free Kerala state [37]. Continuing southward expansion of An. stephensi has resulted in the invasion of Lakshadweep islands in the Indian Ocean [37]. The spread was associated with the availability of larval habitats in the form of water storage cement tanks. It was postulated that, after having reached the southern-most areas of India, An. stephensi may spread across the narrow Palk Strait to Sri Lanka [37]. The present observations and an earlier report [9] confirm that this has indeed occurred. The spread of An. stephensi southward in India and into Sri Lanka, utilizing cemented wells as habitats, may provide an example of the postulated anthropogenically-induced adaptation to invade in mosquito vectors [38]. There has always been a regular movement of people between Mannar and Rameshwaram islands. It is likely that the vector could have arrived from India in water carried in boats to establish itself in the Mannar Island of Sri Lanka.

The identities in cox1, cytb and ITS2 sequences within the Mannar isolates and the single amino acid change in cox1 compared to Indian An. stephensi are consistent with a founder effect i.e. the Mannar mosquitoes being derived from a very small number of An. stephensi that arrived from India. The amino acid change in cox1, indicative of the diversification of Mannar An. stephensi from the Indian form, may result in the spread of the mutation in Sri Lanka if An. stephensi is not eradicated by the new vector control measures now in place. The movement of people between India and the Jaffna peninsula in North Sri Lanka has also been common, becoming particularly prominent during the civil war of 1983–2009. It remains possible that An. stephensi is also present elsewhere in coastal Sri Lanka, particularly the Jaffna peninsula, and has not been detected in the limited entomological surveys performed to date.

Conclusions

The presence of An. stephensi type-form in a rural environmental is of adaptive significance and an added challenge to prevent the re-introduction of malaria into Sri Lanka. Further molecular and bio-ecological studies are warranted to establish the origin, diversity and spread of An. stephensi in Sri Lanka.

Abbreviations

AMC: 

Antimalaria campaign

cox1: 

Cytochrome c oxidase subunit 1 gene

cytb: 

Cytochrome b gene

ITS2: 

Internal transcribed spacer 2

Declarations

Acknowledgements

The support of all heads of households who gave consent to inspect and collect mosquito larvae from their domestic wells/cemented tanks.

Funding

The study received partial financial support from URG/2016/D/01 of the University of Jaffna and RG/HS/2015/04 of the National Science Foundation Sri Lanka.

Availability of data and materials

Anopheles stephensi voucher specimens were deposited in the Zoology Museum of the Department of Zoology, University of Jaffna, country, under the accession numbers MF975722–MF975748. The sequences were deposited in the GenBank database under the accession numbers MF975722–MF975731 (cox1) and MF975738–MF975748 (ITS2).

Authors’ contributions

SNS, RR and SHPPK conceived and designed the study. SA, TTPJ and KS carried out the field studies. KS and SNS carried out the laboratory studies. KG, SNS and SR performed the analysis. SNS and RR wrote the manuscript. KG and SHPPK contributed to the content of the manuscript. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Ethics approval and consent to participate

This work has been carried out as a part of the ongoing mosquito survey with the approval of the Institutional Animal Ethics Committee of the University of Jaffna (AERC/2017/02). Verbal informed consent was obtained from private house owners to collect larvae from their domestic wells and water storage tanks.

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.

Authors’ Affiliations

(1)
Department of Zoology, University of Jaffna, Jaffna, Sri Lanka
(2)
Department of Geography, University of Jaffna, Jaffna, Sri Lanka
(3)
Department of Zoology, University of Peradeniya, Peradeniya, Sri Lanka
(4)
ID-FISH Technology Inc., Palo Alto, USA

References

  1. Wijesundere DA, Ramasamy R. Analysis of historical trends and recent elimination of malaria from Sri Lanka and its applicability for malaria control in other countries. Front Public Health. 2017;5:212.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  2. Amerasinghe PH, Amerasinghe FP, Wirtz RA, Indrajith NG, Somapala W, Pereira LR, Rathnayake AM. Malaria transmission by Anopheles subpictus (Diptera: Culicidae) in a new irrigation project in Sri Lanka. J Med Entomol. 1992;29(4):577–81.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. Amerasinghe PH, Amerasinghe FP, Konradsen F, Fonseka KT, Wirtz RA. Malaria vectors in a traditional dry zone village in Sri Lanka. Am J Trop Med Hyg. 1999;60(3):421–9.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. Ramasamy R, De Alwis R, Wijesundere A, Ramasamy MS. Malaria transmission at a new irrigation project in Sri Lanka: the emergence of Anopheles annularis as a major vector. Am J Trop Med Hyg. 1992;47(5):547–53.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. Surendran SN, Ramasamy R. The Anopheles culicifacies and An. subpictus species complexes in Sri Lanka and their implications for malaria control in the country. Trop Med Health. 2010;38:1–11.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  6. Surendran SN, Singh OP, Jude PJ, Ramasamy R. Genetic evidence for malaria vectors of the Anopheles sundaicus Complex in Sri Lanka with morphological characteristics attributed to Anopheles subpictus species B. Malar J. 2010;9:343.PubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  7. Amerasinghe FP. A guide to the identification of the anopheline mosquitoes (Diptera: Culicidae) of Sri Lanka -I adult females. Cey J Sci (Biological Science). 1990;21:1–16.Google Scholar
  8. Weeraratne TC, Surendran SN, Reimer LJ, Charles S, Wondji CS, et al. Molecular characterization of Anopheline (Diptera: Culicidae) mosquitoes from eight geographical locations of Sri Lanka. Malar J. 2017;16:234.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  9. Dharmasiri AGG, Perera AY, Harishchandra J, Herath H, Aravindan K, Jayasooriya HRT, et al. First record of Anopheles stephensi in Sri Lanka: a potential challenge for prevention of malaria reintroduction. Malar J. 2017;16:326.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  10. Gakhar SK, Sharma R, Sharma A. Population genetic structure of malaria vector Anopheles stephensi Liston (Diptera: Culicidae). Indian J Exp Biol. 2013;51:273–9.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. World Health Organization. Anopheline species complexes in south and South-East Asia. SEARO technical publication no. 57; 2007. p. 79–83.Google Scholar
  12. Sharma RS. Urban malaria and its vectors Anopheles stephensi and Anopheles culicifacies (Diptera: Culicidae) in Gurgaon, India. Southeast Asian J Trop Med Public Health. 1995;26:172–6.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. Nalin DR, Mahood F, Rathor H, Muttab A, Sakai R, Chowdhary MA, et al. A point survey of periurban and urban malaria in Karachi. J Trop Med Hyg. 1985;88:7–15.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. Oshaghi MA, Yaaghoobi F, Abaie MR. Pattern of mitochondrial DNA variation between and within Anopheles stephensi (Diptera: Culicidae) biological forms suggests extensive gene flow. Acta Trop. 2006;99:226–33.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. Sweet WC, Rao B. Races of Anopheles stephensi Liston. 1901. Ind Med Gaz. 1937;72:665–74.PubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  16. Subbarao SK, Vasantha K, Adak T, Sharma VP, Curtis CF. Egg-float ridge number in Anopheles stephensi: ecological variation and genetic analysis. Med Vet Entomol. 1987;1(3):265–71.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. Nagpal BN, Srivastava A, Kalra NL, Subbarao SK. Spiracular indices in Anopheles stephensi: a taxonomic tool to identify ecological variants. J Med Entomol. 2003;40(6):747–9.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. Coluzzi M, Di Deco M, Cancrini G. Chromosomal inversions in Anopheles stephensi. Parassitologia. 1973;15:129–36.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. Suguna SG. Y-chromosome dimorphisms in the malaria vector Anopheles stephensi from south India. Med Vet Entomol. 1992;6:84–6.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. Anyanwu GI, Davies DH, Molyneux DH, Phillips A, Milligan PJ. Cuticular hydrocarbon discrimination/variation among strains of the mosquito, Anopheles (Cellia) stephensi Liston. Ann Trop Med Parasitol. 1993;87:269–75.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. Ramasamy R, Surendran SN. Global climate change and its potential impact on disease transmission by salinity-tolerant mosquito vectors in coastal zones. Front Physiol. 2012;3:198.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  22. Jude PJ, Dharshini S, Vinobaba M, Surendran SN, Ramasamy R. Anopheles culicifacies breeding in brackish waters in Sri Lanka and implications for malaria control. Malar J. 2010;9:106.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  23. Nagpal BN, Srivastava A, Saxena R, Ansari MA, Dash AP, Das SC. Pictorial identification key for Indian anophelines. Delhi: Malaria Research Center; 2005. p. 8–10.Google Scholar
  24. Collins FH, Paskewitz SM. A review of the use of ribosomal DNA (rDNA) to differentiate among cryptic Anopheles species. Insect Mol Biol. 1996;5:1–9.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  25. Simon C, Frati F, Beckenbach A, Crepsi B, Liu H, Flook P. Evolution, weighting and phylogenetic utility of mitochondrial gene sequences and a compilation of conserved polymerase chain reaction primers. Ann Entomol Soc Am. 1994;87:651–701.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  26. Lyman DF, Monteiro FA, Escalante AA, Cordon-Rosales C, Wesson DM, Dujardin JP, Beard CB. Mitochondrial DNA sequence variation among triatomine vectors of Chagas' disease. Am J Trop Med Hyg. 1999;60:377–86.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  27. Surendran NS, Sarma DK, Jude PJ, Kemppainen P, Kanthakumaran N, Gajapathy K, et al. Molecular characterization and identification of members of the Anopheles subpictus Complex in Sri Lanka. Malar J. 2013;12:304.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  28. Tamura K, Peterson D, Peterson N, Stecher G, Nei M, Kumar S. MEGA5: molecular evolutionary genetics analysis using maximum likelihood, evolutionary distance, and maximum parsimony methods. Mol Biol Evol. 2011;28:2731–9.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  29. Librado P, Rozas J. DnaSP v5: a software for comprehensive analysis of DNA polymorphism data. Bioinformatics. 2009;25:1451–2.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  30. Vinogradaskaya ON. Geographic distribution of mosquitoes - vectors of infections (on the basis of their xerophilic and hygrophilly). Moscow: Izadatel'stvo Meditsina; 1969.Google Scholar
  31. Alam MT, Bora H, Das MK, Sharma YD. The type and mysorensis forms of the Anopheles stephensi (Diptera: Culicidae) in India exhibit identical ribosomal DNA ITS2 and domain-3 sequences. Parasitol Res. 2008;103(1):75–80.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  32. Chavshin AR, Oshaghi MA, Vatandoost H, Hanafi-Bojd AA, Raeisi A, Nikpoor F. Molecular characterization, biological forms and sporozoite rate of Anopheles stephensi in southern Iran. Asian Pac J Trop Biomed. 2014;4(1):47–51.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  33. Vipin S, Dube M, Gakhar SK. Genetic differentiation between three ecological variants (‘type’, ‘mysorensis’ and ‘intermediate’) of malaria vector Anopheles stephensi (Diptera: Culicidae). Insect Sci. 2010;17:335–43.Google Scholar
  34. Rao TR. The anophelines of India. Delhi: Malaria Research Centre (ICMR); 1984. p. 518.Google Scholar
  35. Mariappan T, Thenmozhi V, Udayakumar P, Bhavaniumadevi V, Tyagi BK. An observation on breeding behaviour of three different vector species (Aedes aegypti Linnaeus, 1762, Anopheles stephensi Liston, 1901 and Culex quinquefasciatus Say, 1823) in wells in the coastal region of Ramanathapuram district, Tamil Nadu, India. Int J Mosq Res. 2015;2(2):42–4.Google Scholar
  36. Thomas S, Ravishankaran S, Justin JA, Asokan A, Mathai MT, Valecha N, et al. Overhead tank is the potential breeding habitat of Anopheles stephensi in an urban transmission setting of Chennai, India. Malar J. 2016;15:274.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  37. Sharma SK, Hamzakoya KK. Geographical spread of Anopheles stephensi, vector of urban malaria, and Aedes aegypti, vector of dengue/DHF, in the Arabian Sea islands of Lakshadweep, India. Dengue Bulletin. 2001;25:88–91.Google Scholar
  38. Ramasamy R, Surendran SN. Mosquito vectors developing in atypical anthropogenic habitats - global overview of recent observations, mechanisms and impact on disease transmission. J Vector Borne Dis. 2016;53:91–8.PubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright

© The Author(s). 2018

Comments

By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.

Advertisement