Skip to content

Advertisement

Open Access

Seasonal abundance, blood meal sources and insecticide susceptibility in major anopheline malaria vectors from southern Mauritania

  • Mohamed Aly Ould Lemrabott1, 2,
  • Mohamed Salem Ould Ahmedou Salem1,
  • Khyarhoum Ould Brahim1,
  • Cecile Brengues3,
  • Marie Rossignol3,
  • Hervé Bogreau4, 5,
  • Leonardo Basco4, 5,
  • Driss Belghyti2,
  • Frédéric Simard3 and
  • Ali Ould Mohamed Salem Boukhary1, 4Email author
Parasites & Vectors201811:232

https://doi.org/10.1186/s13071-018-2819-3

Received: 6 December 2017

Accepted: 26 March 2018

Published: 10 April 2018

Keywords

MalariaVectorMosquitoes Anopheles spp.Insecticide resistanceTransmissionSahelMauritania

Abstract

Background

Malaria is endemic in the southernmost Sahelian zone of Mauritania where the major known mosquito vector is Anopheles arabiensis. Understanding seasonal population dynamics, feeding preferences and insecticide resistance status of these vectors in the area is essential to improve vector control measures implemented at a local scale. Here, malaria vector populations’ bionomics is described in two sentinel sites located in the Sahelian zone of Mauritania.

Methods

Between September 2014 and December 2016, longitudinal entomological surveys were conducted in Kobeni (15°49'N, 09°24'W) and Rosso (16°30'N; 15°48'W), two localities in the southern Sahelian zone of Mauritania. Adult mosquitoes were collected using indoor pyrethrum spray catch (PSC). Morphological and PCR-based methods were used to identify the species, detect Plasmodium parasites and analyze blood meals in individual mosquitoes. WHO insecticide susceptibility tests were performed with malathion (5%), bendiocarb (0.1%), permethrin (0.75%) and deltamethrin (0.05%) using female An. gambiae (s.l.) reared from larval and pupal collections from natural breeding sites.

Results

A total of 2702 Anopheles mosquitoes were collected by PSC during the study period comprising 2291 Anopheles gambiae (s.l.), 376 Anopheles rufipes and 35 Anopheles pharoensis. In Rosso, all mosquitoes from the An. gambiae (s.l.) complex were molecularly identified as An. arabiensis (n = 455/455, 100%). Anopheles pharoensis represented 2.5% (n = 35/1420) of the specimens collected by PSC in Rosso. In Kobeni, An. arabiensis was dominant (n = 278/301, 92.3%) and occurred together with Anopheles coluzzii (n = 18/301, 6%) and An. gambiae (s.s.) (n = 3/301, 1%). Two An. coluzzii × An. arabiensis hybrids were also detected (0.7%) in Kobeni, and An. rufipes was the only other Anopheles species found resting indoors (n = 376/1277, 29.4%). There was an average of 5.6 and 3.6 indoor resting female An. gambiae (s.l.) per room in Kobeni and Rosso, respectively. Indoor resting female An. gambiae (s.l.) mosquitoes in both sites fed most frequently on bovine blood (35.5% in Rosso and 37% in Kobeni). The proportion of An. gambiae (s.l.) mosquitoes that took human blood was significantly higher in Kobeni (HBI = 37%) than in Rosso (HBI = 5.6%) and 32% of An. gambiae (s.l.) mosquitoes contained blood from more than one host species. None of the 1414 tested mosquitoes in both sites were found positive for Plasmodium spp. sporozoites. WHO insecticide resistance tests revealed resistance to permethrin in the An. arabiensis population from Rosso (mortality = 64%) as well as reduced mortality to deltamethrin (mortality = 97%).

Conclusion

This study provides updated information on the composition and dynamics of the malaria vector system in southern Mauritania where malaria is endemic. Such data are a necessary prerequisite to devise and implement tailored malaria elimination strategies in areas of low residual transmission.

Background

Although the number of countries with ongoing malaria transmission has decreased from 106 in 2000 to 95 by the end of 2015, malaria remains the most important human vector-borne disease worldwide [1]. In Mauritania, malaria is endemic with unstable seasonal transmission and 181,000 presumed and confirmed cases reported in 2015 [2]. Malaria infections are mainly due to Plasmodium falciparum which prevails in the southern Sahelian zone [35], whereas P. vivax is most widespread in the Northern Saharan zone, including Nouakchott, the capital city [3, 6]. Studies conducted in Mauritania indicate that seventeen Anopheles species have been recorded throughout the country out of which four are considered as primary vectors and four as secondary vectors of malaria in Africa [7]. The primary vectors include Anopheles arabiensis, An. gambiae, An. funestus and An. melas whereas An. pharoensis, An. coustani, An. ziemanni and An. wellcomei are considered as secondary vectors [7]. Nevertheless, among the primary vectors, only An. arabiensis has been incriminated as a malaria vector in Mauritania with reported infection rates of 0.25 and 1.6% in the central region of Assaba and Nouakchott, respectively [8, 9].

Data on malaria vector bionomics such as species diversity, local spatial and seasonal distribution and dynamics, feeding preference, vector capacity and resistance to insecticides are of paramount importance in the epidemiology and control of malaria [10, 11]. Data on seasonal abundance of malaria vectors in a given area are a prerequisite for understanding their role in malaria transmission and for predicting disease outbreaks [12]. For instance, high densities of mosquito vector population have been shown to be associated with many malaria epidemics that occurred in Iran [13]. Moreover, identification of the source of blood meals of malaria vectors is critical to a better understanding of the degree of human-vector interaction (i.e. anthropophily) [14] and estimation of the capacity to transmit the disease. Resting behavior is also another parameter that determines whether mosquito population prefers to rest indoors (endophilic) or outdoors (exophilic) after blood-feeding. Both kinds of resting behavior were observed in An. gambiae, An. arabiensis and An. funestus, the major malaria vectors in sub-Saharan Africa, with considerable variation between and within species [15]. For instance, An. gambiae (s.s.) and An. funestus are thought to be largely endophilic and spend considerable time indoors [16, 17] although exophilic behavior has also been reported [18, 19]. In contrast, An. arabiensis is generally exophilic [19] although endophily has also been reported [16, 20]. Nonetheless, mosquito resting behavior is a very important variable for planning mosquito control, especially when insecticides are to be used in indoor residual spraying (IRS). Moreover, the rapid development of insecticide-resistant malaria vectors seriously threatens the progress made in malaria control to date due to the limited number of insecticide classes recommended by the World Health Organization (WHO) for use against adult mosquitoes in public health programs [21].

Data on malaria vector bionomics in Mauritania are scarce, and in most cases date back to more than 50 years ago [22, 23] although few entomological studies were recently conducted [8, 9]. The aims of the present study were to investigate the species composition, seasonal variation and feeding preference of Anopheles mosquitoes in the Sahelian zone in Mauritania and to assess their susceptibility/resistance status against insecticides available to the National Malaria Control Programme for their control.

Methods

Study sites

Mosquitoes were sampled in the cities of Kobeni (15°49'N, 09°24'W, altitude 200 m above sea level) and Rosso (16°30'N, 15°48'W, altitude 8 m above sea level) in the provinces of Hodh Elgharbi and Trarza bordering Mali and Senegal, respectively (Fig. 1). Both localities belong to the Sahelian ecoclimatic zone characterized by a long dry season lasting from October to June and a short wet season extending from July to September. Rosso and Kobeni were selected for entomological studies because of their contrasting malaria epidemiological situation. Indeed, despite the presence of Anopheles gambiae (s.l.) as the main malaria vector and P. falciparum as the dominant causative parasite in the two study sites, malaria prevalence was shown to be low in Rosso [24], whereas a holoendemic malaria situation prevails in Kobeni [25].
Fig. 1

Map of Mauritania showing the study sites

Rosso, the major city of southwestern Mauritania and the regional capital of Trarza, is situated 204 km south of the capital city Nouakchott and has 57,000 inhabitants [26]. Its location along the Senegal River and the construction of numerous irrigation canals have contributed to the rapid propagation of irrigated agriculture, mainly consisting of rice cultivation. The city is bordered eastwards and westwards by large rice fields. Moors, Peulhs and Wolofs are the main ethnic groups of the city. The annual rainfall during the study period in Rosso was 77, 354 and 216 mm in 2014, 2015 and 2016, respectively. Mean relative humidity for the same period was 39, 65 and 62% and average temperature was 29 °C.

Kobeni, located around 20 km north of the Mali-Mauritania border, is the biggest district of the southeastern province of Hodh Elgharbi with 97,000 inhabitants according to the latest available population census data from 2013. During the rainy season of 2014, 2015 and 2016 the total rainfalls in Kobeni were 333, 409 and 250 mm, respectively. Data on the monthly rainfall during the study period were obtained from the national meteorological office (Fig. 2). Mean relative humidity throughout the study period was 47.5% (ranging from 19% in May-June to 76% in August-September) and the average temperature was 35 °C (ranging from 28 °C in January-February to 44 °C in April-May) [5]. Major human activities in Kobeni are livestock rearing (mainly cattle, sheep and goats) and rain-fed agriculture (mainly millet, sorghum and bean). A semi-permanent large pond is located near the city. Moors, Pulars, Soninkes and Bambara are living in Kobeni.
Fig. 2

Monthly resting density of female Anopheles spp. and rainfall for the period 2014–2016 in two Sahelian sites, southern Mauritania

Dwellings in Kobeni and Rosso include traditional huts with mud walls and thatched roofs and modern buildings with cement walls and corrugated iron roofs. Domestic animals in both study sites are generally kept in fences close to human habitations. There are no precise data on the relative abundance of each domestic animal species but cattle and small ruminants (goats and sheep) are more abundant than humans in Kobeni in comparison with Rosso.

Mosquito sampling and field processing

Indoor resting mosquitoes were collected by pyrethroid spray catches (PSC) [27]. PSCs were carried out for 28 months (September 2014 - December 2016) in seven randomly selected rooms per site, twice per month during the wet season (July-September) and monthly during the dry season (October-June). Mosquitoes were first visually sorted and grouped by genus (Anopheles, Culex or Aedes) and sex. Only female Anopheles specimens were then identified to species using standard taxonomic keys [28, 29]. Their gonotrophic status was determined as unfed, blood-fed, half-gravid or gravid. Specimens were stored individually in numbered microtubes containing silica gel and kept at -20 °C until further processed in the laboratory in Nouakchott.

DNA isolation and species identification

Genomic DNA was isolated from legs and wings of individual An. gambiae (s.l.) mosquitoes using 2% cetyltrimethylammonium bromide (CTAB) solution [20 mM Tris-HCl pH 8; 10 mM ethylenediamine tetraacetic acid (EDTA); 1.4 mM NaCl; 2% N-acetyl-N,N,N,-trimethyl ammonium bromide] according to the method described by Delatte et al. [30]. Anopheles gambiae sibling species were identified using the multiplex PCR protocol developed by Scott et al. [31]. Anopheles gambiae and An. coluzzii, formerly known as S and M forms of An. gambiae, respectively, were differentiated using the short interspersed elements (SINE 200) approach, according to Santolamazza et al. [32].

Blood meal source identification

The origin of the blood meal was assessed in fully blood-fed female mosquitoes using the protocol developed by Kent & Norris [33]. This multiplex PCR allows detection of human, bovine, goat, sheep, donkey and dog blood based on the amplification of a segment of the cytochrome oxydase b (cytb) gene, which varies in size.

Insecticide susceptibility test

Mosquito immature stages were collected in Rosso and Kobeni in September-October 2015 and 2016 corresponding to the rainy season, through dipping from natural breeding sites consisting of highly productive rainwater puddles. Once collected, the larvae and pupae were transported in plastic bottles to the laboratory where they were reared at 26 ± 2 °C and 70 ± 5% relative humidity. Pupae were transferred into plastic cups and placed in cages for emergence of adult mosquitoes. Emerged adults were provided with sterile 10% sugar solution and morphologically identified using a taxonomic key [29]. Test papers impregnated with four WHO-certified insecticides, namely permethrin (0.75%), deltamethrin (0.05%), bendiocarb (0.1%), and malathion (2%), were used to perform the standard WHO adult bioassay [34]. Two-day-old female An. gambiae (s.l.) mosquitoes were exposed to the insecticide-impregnated or to the control oil-impregnated papers per batch of 20–25 sugar-fed female adults (i.e. four treatment and two control replicates per test). Observation of the number of knocked-down mosquitoes was made during one hour-long exposure period at regular intervals, after 10, 20, 30, 40, 50 and 60 min. Mosquitoes were then transferred into recovery tubes and kept under laboratory conditions with access to water and 10% sugar solution. Total mortality was recorded after 24 h. When mortality in the control group was between 5–20%, Abbott’s formula [35] was used to correct mortality estimates in test groups.

Molecular detection of Plasmodium spp. in resting mosquitoes

DNA was extracted from dissected head and thorax of 1414 female mosquitoes and screened for P. falciparum, P. vivax, P. malariae and P. ovale DNA using the quantitative PCR assay with EvaGreen dye described in Mangold et al. [36]. Dissociation curves were used to estimate the specific melting temperature for each reaction. PCR amplifications were conducted in a LightCycler® 480 (Roche Applied Science, Mannheim, Germany).

Data analysis

Indoor resting densities (IRD) were calculated for each species and locality as the arithmetic mean of the number of resting female mosquitoes collected per sprayed room in that locality at a given sampling date.

The human blood index (HBI) of engorged mosquito was estimated as the proportion of freshly fed mosquitoes found to contain human blood [37]. Mixed blood meals that contain human blood were included in the HBI calculation.

The fed to gravid ratio (F/G ratio) was calculated by dividing the total number of freshly fed mosquitoes by the total number of gravid and semi-gravid mosquitoes [27]. A F/G ratio > 1 indicates that females mosquitoes likely exit rapidly after a blood meal, suggesting exophilic behavior. In contrast, if the ratio is constantly less than 1, it indicates indoor resting tendency of the species (endophily).

Resistance/susceptibility of the tested mosquito populations was determined for each insecticide according to WHO criteria [34]. Mortality rates below 80% after 24 h observation period are indicative of resistance, whereas mortality rates above 98% indicate full susceptibility to the insecticide under scrutiny. When mortality rates range from 80 to 98%, resistance is suspected and should be further confirmed. Average IRD, F/G ratios, and HBI proportions were compared using z-statistics or t-statistics depending on the sample size. The 95% confidence intervals of the mortality rates of insecticide-exposed mosquitoes were calculated using Excel. A log-probit analysis was performed according to the method of Finney [38] using the R script [39], to compute KDT50 and KDT95 defined as the time taken to knock down 50 and 90% of mosquitoes, respectively. Statistical analyses of IRD, F/G ratios and HBI were performed using SPSS version 20 (SPSS Inc., Chicago, IL, USA) [40]. A probability value (P) of < 0.05 was considered statistically significant.

Results

Distribution and abundance of malaria vectors

A total of 2702 Anopheles mosquitoes (1277 in Kobeni and 1425 in Rosso) were collected by spray catch in the two selected study sites from September 2014 to December 2016 (Table 1). Morphological identification showed that the indoor resting mosquito fauna was essentially composed of An. gambiae (s.l.) mosquitoes in both sites, representing 97.8% of the total collections in Rosso and 70.6% in Kobeni. Specimens of Anopheles pharoensis (n = 35, 2.2%) were also found in Rosso. In Kobeni, a large proportion of An. rufipes (n = 376, 29.4%) was also found resting indoors whereas no specimen of An. rufipes was collected in Rosso (Table 1).
Table 1

Diversity of indoor resting female Anopheles spp. collected using pyrethrum space-spray catches between 2014 and 2016 from two Sahelian sites in Mauritania

  

Rosso n (%)

Kobeni n (%)

Anopheles spp.

An. gambiae (s.l.)

1390 (97.5)

901 (70.6)

 

An. pharoensis

35 (2.5)

0

 

An. rufipes

0

376 (29.4)

 

Total

1425 (100)

1277 (100)

An. gambiae (s.l.) complex

An. arabiensis

455 (100)

278 (92.3)

 

An. gambiae

0

3 (1)

 

An. coluzzii

0

18 (6)

 

Hybrida

0

2 (0.7)

 

Total

455 (100)

301 (100)

aAn. arabiensis + An. coluzzii

Molecular identification of An. gambiae sibling species was carried out in 455 and 301 randomly selected mosquito specimens from Rosso and Kobeni, respectively. In Rosso, only An. arabiensis was detected, while in Kobeni, An. arabiensis (278/301; 92.3%) occurred together with An. coluzzii (18/301; 6%) and An. gambiae (3/301; 1%). Two specimens (0.7%) were also identified as An. arabiensis × An. coluzzii hybrids in this locality (Table 1).

In Rosso, indoor resting An. arabiensis mosquitoes were captured throughout the study period (2014–2016) while in Kobeni, little or no specimens were captured indoor during the dry season (Fig. 2). Indoor resting densities of An. gambiae (s.l.) peaked during the rainy season with highest values observed in August and September in both sites during the study period, rising up to 50 (in September 2016) and 31 (in September 2014) specimens/room in Rosso and Kobeni, respectively. Peaks in mosquito abundance were observed concomitantly with rainfall peaks in Rosso, or with a slight delay in time in Kobeni. The overall indoor resting density of An. gambiae (s.l.) during the study period was significantly higher (z = 2.96, P = 0.003) in Rosso (IRD = 5.6 mosquitoes/room; n = 245 rooms) than in Kobeni (IRD = 3.6 mosquitoes/room; n = 245 rooms). Anopheles pharoensis was observed throughout the year in Rosso, although at low IRD (< 1.5 mosquitoes/room). In Kobeni, Anopheles rufipes occurred together with An. gambiae (s.l.) with IRD ranging from 0 during the late dry season (May-July) to 3 mosquitoes/room during the late rainy season/early dry season (August-January).

Abdominal appearance and blood meal identification

Table 2 shows the results of abdominal inspections for all the indoor resting female mosquitoes collected in Kobeni and Rosso throughout the study. In Rosso, the fed to gravid (F/G) ratio of both An. arabiensis and An. pharoensis were below 1 suggesting mainly exophilic behavior. By contrast, in Kobeni, the F/G ratios of An. gambiae (s.l.), including mainly An. arabiensis, and An. rufipes were higher than 1, suggesting endophilic behavior of these malaria vectors in this locality. However, the F/G ratios of An. gambiae (s.l.) mosquitoes from Kobeni (F/G = 1.3) and Rosso (F/G = 0.76) were not statistically different (t(17) = 1.83, P = 0.09).
Table 2

Abdominal status of indoor resting female Anopheles collected using the pyrethrum space-spray sheet method in two Sahelian sites in Mauritania

Study site

Abdominal status

Anopheles spp. n (%)

 

An. gambiae (s.l.)

An. rufipes

An. pharoensis

Rosso

Total

1390

35

 

Unfed

249 (17.9)

11 (31.4)

 

Blood-fed

495 (35.6)

4 (11.4)

 

Gravid

117 (8.4)

10 (28.5)

 

Semi-gravid

529 (38.1)

10 (28.5)

 

F/G ratio

0.76

 

0.2

Kobeni

Total

901

376

 

Unfed

96 (10.6)

50 (13.3)

 

Blood-fed

456 (50.6)

207 (55)

 

Gravid

110 (12.2)

22 (5.8)

 

Half-gravid

239 (26.5)

97 (25.8)

 

F/G ratio

1.3

1.7

 

Abbreviations: F/G ratio, fed to gravid ratio

A total of 253 blood meals from resting female An. arabiensis collected in the two study sites (107 from Rosso and 146 from Kobeni) were tested by PCR to determine the source (Table 3). Resting female An. arabiensis in the two study sites had taken their blood meals from cattle (36%), donkey (14.6%), human (13%), goat (3.2%) and dog (0.8%). Overall, 81 (32%) An. arabiensis fed on multiple hosts among which 27 (33.3%) contained blood of human origin. HBI of An. arabiensis mosquitoes from Kobeni (HBI = 37%, n = 146) and Rosso (HBI = 5.6%, n = 107) were statistically different (z = 5.8, P < 0.001) and suggested low anthropophily.
Table 3

Source of blood meals of indoor resting female An. arabiensis in two Sahelian sites in Mauritania

Blood meal source

Study site

Total

Rosso n (%)

Kobeni n (%)

Single host

78 (72.9)

94 (64.4)

172 (68.0)

Human

4 (3.7)

29 (19.9)

33 (13.0)

Cattle

38 (35.3)

54 (37.0)

92 (36.3)

Donkey

31 (29.0)

6 (4.1)

37 (14.6)

Goat

3 (2.8)

5 (3.4)

8 (3.2)

Dog

2 (1.9)

0

2 (0.8)

Multiple hosts

29 (27.1)

52 (35.6)

81 (32.0)

Human × cattle

0

10 (6.8)

10 (3.9)

Human × donkey

0

1 (0.7)

1 (0.4)

Human × others

2 (1.9)

14 (9.6)

16 (6.3)

Other × other

27 (25.2)

27 (18.5)

54 (21.3)

Total

107 (100)

146 (100)

253 (100)

HBIa (%)

5.6

37

23.7

aHBI is the number of blood meals containing human blood (single and multiple hosts) over the total number of blood meals analyzed

Insecticide susceptibility

An. gambiae (s.l.) mosquitoes in Kobeni and Rosso were fully susceptible (100% mortality) to bendiocarb and malathion. They were also susceptible to deltamethrin (100% mortality) and permethrin (98.6% mortality) in Kobeni (Table 4). However, in Rosso, tested An. arabiensis mosquitoes were resistant to permethrin (64% mortality) and suspected to be resistant to deltamethrin (97% mortality).
Table 4

Mortality rates and knockdown times for An. gambiae (s.l.) populations exposed to different insecticides in two Sahelian sites in Mauritania

Insecticide

Rosso

Kobeni

n

% mortality

(95% CI)a

KDT50 (95% CI)

KDT95 (95% CI)

n

% mortality (95% CI)a

KDT50 (95% CI)

KDT95 (95% CI)

Deltamethrin 0.05%

100

97 (95–99)

17 (15–18)

63 (54–77)

80

100

14 (5–20)

91 (52–580)

Permethrin 0.75%

100

64 (60–68)

31 (26–38)

592 (297–2007)

75

98.6 (96–100)

17 (14–20)

141 (98–248)

Malathion 5%

100

100

  

100

100

  

Bendiocarb 0.1%

100

100

  

100

100

  

aMortality rate 24 hr post exposure to the insecticides with 95% confidence intervals in parentheses

Abbreviations: n, number of mosquitoes tested; KDT50 and KDT95, knockdown time in minutes for 50 and 95% mortality, respectively

Plasmodium infection

None of the 1414 Anopheles gambiae (s.l.) tested for P. vivax, P. falciparum, P. ovale and P. malariae sporozoite infections was found positive.

Discussion

The scarcity of data on malaria vector diversity, bionomics, insecticide susceptibility status and possible role in malaria transmission, particularly in the Sahelian malaria endemic zone, is a major hindrance for the implementation of an efficient malaria control programme in Mauritania. The present study documented the presence of An. arabiensis, An. gambiae, An. coluzzii, An. rufipes and An. pharoensis in the southern Sahelian zone of Mauritania. Within the An. gambiae complex, analyses also revealed the presence of two interspecific An. coluzzii × An. arabiensis hybrid females, accounting for 0.7% of the mosquitoes collected in Kobeni. Such frequency of hybrids is in agreement with the results of a recent meta-analysis of cross-species mating and hybridization within the An. gambiae complex in Africa [41]. Presence of these hybrids also highlights opportunities for gene flow between mosquito species within the An. gambiae complex, with possible introgression of insecticide resistance genes or other genetic traits of epidemiological or adaptive importance.

In Rosso, mosquitoes were present throughout the year in sampled dwellings, although with strong seasonal variation in abundance, whereas in Kobeni, no mosquito was collected during the driest and hottest months, at the end of the long dry season. The presence of An. pharoensis, a species known to breed in rice fields and generally associated to large swamps with vegetation, together with the year-round occurrence of An. arabiensis in Rosso, suggests permanent mosquito breeding is possible in the surrounding irrigation schemes or along the banks of River Senegal, as observed in other areas of Sahelian sub-Saharan Africa [4246]. However, these putative breeding sites contribute little to the local vector production and the overall vector population dynamics appears to be driven by rainfall dynamics. Nonetheless, irrigated areas around Rosso might still represent a refuge where these vector populations can develop at a low rate during the harsh dry season, allowing rapid population expansion as soon as the rains start again for the next wet season [45, 46]. Anopheles pharoensis is a known vector of human Plasmodium in Africa [28, 29] and sporozoite-positive specimens were found in the Senegal River Delta [47]. Therefore, this mosquito might play a role as a secondary malaria vector in Rosso, although none of the specimens collected within the frame of our study was found infected with Plasmodium. Further studies are required to specifically investigate the epidemiological importance of this mosquito in residual malaria transmission in this area.

On the other hand, An. rufipes, which was collected in great numbers in Kobeni (i.e. 30% of the anopheline mosquitoes collected indoor in this locality) is known to be predominantly zoophilic, feeding mainly on cattle and non-human vertebrates, while often found resting inside human dwellings [28]. It is therefore unlikely to contribute to malaria transmission in the area.

Results also confirmed the wide distribution of An. arabiensis in the country [4, 5, 79]. However, despite the number of An. arabiensis mosquitoes analyzed using a highly sensitive quantitative PCR protocol [36], none of them were found positive for malaria parasites. Analyses of the blood meal sources revealed a very high proportion of non-human hosts and, consecutively, a very low human blood index for An. arabiensis in both Rosso and, to a lower extent, in Kobeni (HBI = 5.6 and 37% for An. arabiensis in Rosso and Kobeni, respectively). Although indoor resting mosquitoes were collected in the present study, our findings suggest that An. arabiensis exhibits both exophagic and endophagic behaviors. These results may have an important repercussion on vector control interventions, as exophagic vectors are more difficult to control by insecticide-impregnated bednets and indoor spraying of insecticides but are more amenable to control by interventions directed against the breeding sites. Many environmental factors, including host availability, host accessibility and innate host preference of mosquito, influence the final host selection of An. arabiensis and other members of the An. gambiae complex in Africa, which in turn modifies their blood-feeding behavior [48]. For instance, Sharp & Lesieur [49] demonstrated that An. arabiensis shifts from feeding on humans to feeding on livestock in response to indoor residual spraying of insecticides for vector control. Apparent zoophilic feeding behavior of An. arabiensis was already noticed in the area [8, 9].

Moreover, a low fed to gravid ratio as observed in Rosso indicates that a high proportion of females complete part of their gonotrophic cycles outdoors, suggesting exophilic behavior of the species. Our sampling design targeted only the endophilic fraction of the resident mosquito population in both sites, and it is therefore highly recommended to extend sampling to the outdoor biting/resting mosquito population in order to explore the possibility of residual malaria transmission occurring primarily outdoors. Indeed, previous studies showed natural sporozoite infections in An. arabiensis in the area, suggesting the vector likely contributes to malaria transmission [8, 9].

This study also revealed the presence of resistance to permethrin and suspected resistance to deltamethrin in An. arabiensis mosquitoes in Rosso and their full susceptibility to malathion and bendiocarb. However, in Kobeni, An. arabiensis mosquitoes were susceptible to all four insecticides tested. Insecticide susceptibility/resistance status of malaria vector in the Sahelian zone of Mauritania has never been assessed, except in one study that found full susceptibility (100% mortality rate) of An. arabiensis to permethrin in Rosso, Boghé, Sélibaby and Aioun and full susceptibility of An. pharoensis to deltamethrin in Rosso and Boghé [Traoré SF, unpublished WHO mission report, 2002]. The results presented in this study therefore suggest spread and selection for resistant mosquito population in Rosso, where the use of insecticide-based vector control methods together with the use of insecticide in agriculture, might be more intensive than in Kobeni (Ould Mohamed Salem Boukhary, personal communication). Since the current vector control measures are essentially based on the widespread distribution and use of pyrethroid-impregnated bed nets, regular surveillance of insecticide susceptibility of An. arabiensis is of utmost importance for an effective national malaria control programme.

Conclusions

Sampling indoor resting mosquitoes in Rosso and Kobeni showed the predominance of An. gambiae (s.l.) (mostly or exclusively An. arabiensis), as well as smaller proportions of An. pharoensis (in Rosso) and An. rufipes (in Kobeni), and revealed highly zoophilic and putative exophilic preferences for the major malaria mosquito An. arabiensis in southern Mauritania where malaria is endemic and seasonal. Resistance to permethrin and, to a lesser extent deltamethrin, occurs in An. arabiensis captured in Rosso, but not in Kobeni. Further investigations on residual malaria transmission dynamics are required in this area for efficient disease and vector control strategies.

Abbreviations

HBI: 

Human blood index

IRD: 

Indoor resting density

IRS: 

Indoor residual spraying

KDT: 

Knockdown time

PSC: 

Pyrethrum space-spray catch

WHO: 

World Health Organization

Declarations

Acknowledgements

The authors are grateful to the residents of Rosso and Kobeni for their cooperation throughout the study.

Funding

This work was supported by Expertise France (Initiative 5% grant).

Availability of data and materials

All data generated or analyzed during this study are included in this published article.

Authors’ contributions

MAOL, MSOAS, KOB, CB and MR conceived and designed the study. MAOL and MSOAS carried out the field collections. MAOL, CB and MR performed the experiments. MAOL, CB, MR and AOMSB analyzed the data. HB, LB, DB, FS and AOMSB drafted the manuscript and read, critically revised and approved the final manuscript. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Ethics approval and consent to participate

Not applicable.

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.

Authors’ Affiliations

(1)
Unité de Recherche Génomes et Milieux, Université de Nouakchott Al-Aasriya, Faculté des Sciences et Techniques, Nouakchott, Mauritania
(2)
Laboratoire Biotechnologie et Environnement, Equipe de Parasitologie et Environnement, Département de Biologie, Faculté des Sciences, Université Ibn Tofail, Kénitra, Morocco
(3)
Maladies Infectieuses et Vecteurs: Ecologie, Génétique, Evolution et Contrôle (MIVEGEC), Institut de Recherche pour le Développement - Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique - Université de Montpellier, BP 64501, 34394 Montpellier, France
(4)
Aix-Marseille Université, Institut de Recherche pour le Développement, Assistance Publique - Hôpitaux de Marseille, Service de Santé des Armées, Unité Mixte de Recherche Vecteurs - Infections Tropicales et Méditerranéennes (VITROME), Institut Hospitalo-Universitaire - Méditerranée Infection, Marseille, France
(5)
Unité de Parasitologie et d’Entomologie, Institut de Recherche Biomédicale des Armées (IRBA), Marseille, France

References

  1. WHO. World malaria report 2015. Geneva: World Health Organization; 2015.Google Scholar
  2. WHO. World malaria report 2016. Geneva: World Health Organization; 2016.Google Scholar
  3. Ould Ahmedou Salem MS, Basco LK, Ouldabdellahi M, Mint Lekweiry K, Konate L, Faye O, et al. Malaria-associated morbidity during the rainy season in Saharan and Sahelian zones in Mauritania. Acta Trop. 2015;152:1–7.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. Ould Ahmedou Salem MS, Mint Lekweiry K, Bouchiba H, Pascual A, Pradines B, Ould Mohamed Salem Boukhary A, et al. Characterization of Plasmodium falciparum genes associated with drug resistance in Hodh Elgharbi, a malaria hotspot near Malian-Mauritanian border. Malar J. 2017;16:140.Google Scholar
  5. Ouldabdallahi Moukah M, Ba O, Ba H, Ould Khairy ML, Faye O, Bogreau H, et al. Malaria in three epidemiological strata in Mauritania. Malar J. 2016;15:204.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  6. Mint Lekweiry K, Basco LK, Ould Ahmedou Salem MS, Hafid JE, Marin-Jauffre A, Ould Weddih A, et al. Malaria prevalence and morbidity among children reporting at health facilities in Nouakchott, Mauritania. Trans R Soc Trop Med Hyg. 2011;105:727–33.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  7. Mint Mohamed Lemine A, Ould Lemrabott MA, Ebou MH, Mint Lekweiry K, Ould Ahmedou Salem MS, Ould Brahim K, et al. Mosquitoes (Diptera: Culicidae) in Mauritania: a review of their biodiversity, distribution and medical importance. Parasit Vectors. 2017;10:35.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  8. Dia I, Ba H, Ould Mohamed SA, Diallo D, Lo B, Diallo M. Distribution, host preference and infection rates of malaria vectors in Mauritania. Parasit Vectors. 2009;2:61.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  9. Mint Lekweiry K, Ould Ahmedou Salem MS, Cotteaux-Lautard C, Jarjaval F, Marin-Jauffre A, Bogreau H, et al. Circumsporozoite protein rates, blood-feeding pattern and frequency of knockdown resistance mutations in Anopheles spp. in two ecological zones of Mauritania. Parasit Vectors. 2016;9:268.View ArticlePubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  10. Service M, Voller A, Bidwell DE. The enzyme linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) test for the identification of bloodmeals of haematophagous insects. Bull Entomol Res. 1986;76:321–30.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  11. Service M. The importance of ecological studies on malaria vectors. Bull Soc Vector Ecol. 1989;14:26–38.Google Scholar
  12. Bashar K, Tuno N. Seasonal abundance of Anopheles mosquitoes and their association with meteorological factors and malaria incidence in Bangladesh. Parasit Vectors. 2014;7:442.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  13. Basseri H, Raeisi A, Khakha MR, Pakarai A, Abdolghafar H. Seasonal abundance and host-feeding patterns of anopheline vectors in malaria endemic area of Iran. J Parasitol Res. 2010;2010:671291.Google Scholar
  14. Garrett-Jones C, Boreham PFL, Pant CP. Feeding habits of anophelines (Diptera: Culicidae) in 1971–78, with reference to the human blood index: a review. Bull Entomol Res. 1980;70:165–85.Google Scholar
  15. Paaijmans KP, Thomas MB. The influence of mosquito resting behaviour and associated microclimate for malaria risk. Malaria J. 2011;10:183.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  16. Faye O, Konate L, Mouchet J, Fontenille D, Sy N, Hebrard G, et al. Indoor resting by outdoor biting females of Anopheles gambiae complex (Diptera: Culicidae) in the sahel of northern Senegal. J Med Entomol. 1997;34:285–9.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. Githeko AK, Service MW, Mbogo CM, Atieli FK. Resting behaviour, ecology and genetics of malaria vectors in large scale agricultural areas of western Kenya. Parassitologia. 1996;38:481–9.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. Fontenille D, Lepers JP, Campbell GH, Coluzzi M, Rakotoarivony I, Coulanges P. Malaria transmission and vector biology in Manarintsoa, high plateaux of Madagascar. Am J Trop Med Hyg. 1990;43:107–15.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. Mahande A, Mosha F, Mahande J, Kweka E. Feeding and resting behavior of malaria vector, Anopheles arabiensis with reference to zooprophylaxis. Malar J. 2007;6:100.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  20. Lemasson JJ, Fontenille D, Lochouarn L, Dia I, Simard F, Ba K, et al. Comparison of behavior and vector efficiency of Anopheles gambiae and An. arabiensis (Diptera: Culicidae) in Barkedji, a Sahelian area of Senegal. J Med Entomol. 1997;34:396–403.Google Scholar
  21. Hemingway J, Ranson H, Magill A, Kolaczinski J, Fornadel C, Gimnig J, et al. Averting a malaria disaster: will insecticide resistance derail malaria control? Lancet. 2016;387:1785–8.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. Hamon J, Maffi M, Grenier P, Ouedraogo CS, Djime D. Note sur les moustiques de la République Islamique de Mauritanie (1ère partie). Ann Soc Entomol France. 1964;69:233–53.Google Scholar
  23. Hamon J, Maffi M, Grenier P, Ouedraogo CS, Djime D. Note sur les moustiques de la République Islamique de Mauritanie (2ème partie). Ann Soc Entomol France. 1966;2:371–83.Google Scholar
  24. Ouldabdallahi M, Ouldbezeid M, Dieye M, Yacine B, Faye O. Etude de la part du paludisme chez les consultants fébriles et des indices plasmodiques chez des écoliers dans la région du Trarza, République Islamique de Mauritanie. Bull Soc Pathol Exot. 2011;104:288–90.Google Scholar
  25. Jelinek T, Aida AO, Peyerl-Hoffmann G, Jordan S, Mayor A, Heuschkel C, et al. Diagnostic value of molecular markers in chloroquine-resistant falciparum malaria in southern Mauritania. Am J Trop Med Hyg. 2002;67:449–53.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  26. Office National des statistiques. Annuaire statistique 2016. Ministère de l’Economie et des Finances, Mauritania. http://www.ons.mr/images/Archive/doc/publication/Annuaire_Statistique_2016.pdf. Accessed 23 Sept 2017.
  27. WHO. Manual on practical entomology in malaria, Part II: Methods and techniques. Geneva: World Health Organization; 1975.Google Scholar
  28. Gillies M, De Meillon B. The Anophelinae of Africa south of the Sahara. Johannesburg: South Africa Institute of Medical Research Johannesburg; 1968.Google Scholar
  29. Gillies M, Coetzee M. A supplement to the Anophelinae of Africa south of the Sahara (Afrotropical region). Johannesburg: South Africa Institute of Medical Research Johannesburg; 1987.Google Scholar
  30. Delatte H, Bagny L, Brengue C, Bouetard A, Paupy C, Fontenille D. The invaders: phylogeography of dengue and chikungunya viruses Aedes vectors, on the South West islands of the Indian Ocean. Infect Genet Evol. 2011;11(7):1769–81.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  31. Scott JA, Brogdon WG, Collins FH. Identification of single specimens of the Anopheles gambiae complex by the polymerase chain reaction. Am J Trop Med Hyg. 1993;49:520–9.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  32. Santolamazza F, Mancini E, Simard F, Qi YM, Tu ZJ, Della Torre A. Insertion polymorphisms of SINE200 retrotransposons within speciation islands of Anopheles gambiae molecular forms. Malaria J. 2008;7:163.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  33. Kent RJ, Norris DE. Identification of mammalian blood meals in mosquitoes by a multiplexed polymerase chaine reaction targeting cytochrome B. Am J Trop Med Hyg. 2005;73:336–42.PubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  34. WHO. Test procedures for insecticide resistance monitoring in malaria vector mosquitoes. Geneva: World Health Organization; 2013.Google Scholar
  35. Abbott WS. A method of computing the effectiveness of an insecticide. J Econ Entomol. 1925;18:265–7.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  36. Mangold KA, Manson RU, Koay ES, Stephens L, Regner M, Thomson RB Jr, et al. Real-time PCR for detection and identification of Plasmodium spp. J Clin Microbiol. 2005;43:2435–40.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  37. WHO. Terminology of malaria and of malaria eradication. Geneva: World Health Organization; 1963.Google Scholar
  38. Finney DJ. Probit analysis. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 1971. p. 350.Google Scholar
  39. Milesi P, Pocquet N, Labbé P. BioRssay: a R script for bioassay analyses. 2013. http://www.isem.univ-montp2.fr/recherche/equipes/evolution-vecteurs-adaptation-et-symbioses/personnel/labbe-pierrick//. Accessed 23 March 2018.Google Scholar
  40. IBM Corp. IBM SPSS Statistics for Windows, Version 20.0. IBM Corp: Armonk, NY; 2011.Google Scholar
  41. Pombi M, Kengne P, Gimonneau G, Tene-Fossog B, Ayala D, Kamdem C, et al. Dissecting functional components of reproductive isolation among closely related sympatric species of the Anopheles gambiae complex. Evol Appl. 2017;10(10):1102–20.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  42. Robert V, Van de Broek A, Stevens P, Slootweg R, Petrarca V, Coluzzi M, et al. Mosquitoes and malaria transmission in irrigated rice-fields in the Benoue Valley of northern Cameroon. Acta Trop. 1992;52:201–4.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  43. Mukiama TK, Mwangi RW. Seasonal population changes and malaria transmission potential of Anopheles pharoensis and the minor anophelines in Mwea Irrigation Scheme, Kenya. Acta Trop. 1989;46:181–9.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  44. Dia I, Konate L, Samb B, Sarr JB, Diop A, Rogerie F, et al. Bionomics of malaria vectors and relationship with malaria transmission and epidemiology in three physiographic zones in the Senegal River Basin. Acta Trop. 2008;105:145–53.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  45. Sogoba N, Doumbia S, Vounatsou P, Bagayoko MM, Dolo G, Traoré SF, et al. Malaria transmission dynamics in Niono, Mali: the effect of the irrigation systems. Acta Trop. 2007;101:232–40.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  46. Kerah-Hinzoumbé V, Péka M, Antonio-Nkondjio C, Donan-Gouni I, Awono-Ambene P, Samè-Ekobo A, et al. Malaria vectors and transmission dynamics in Goulmoun, a rural city in south-western Chad. BMC Infect Dis. 2009;9:71.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  47. Carrara GC, Petrarca V, Niang M, Coluzzi M. Anopheles pharoensis and transmission of Plasmodium falciparum in the Senegal River Delta. West Africa. Med Vet Entomol. 1990;4(4):421.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  48. Lefèvre T, Gouagna L-C, Dabiré KR, Elguero E, Fontenille D, Renaud F, et al. Beyond nature and nurture: phenotypic plasticity in blood-feeding behavior of Anopheles gambiae s.s. when humans are not readily accessible. Am J Trop Med Hyg. 2009;81:1023–9.Google Scholar
  49. Sharp LB, le Sueur LD. Behavioural variation of Anopheles arabiensis (Diptera: Culicidae) population in Natal, South Africa. Bull Entomol Res. 1991;81:107–10.View ArticleGoogle Scholar

Copyright

© The Author(s). 2018

Comments

By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.

Advertisement