Skip to content

Advertisement

  • Research
  • Open Access

Diversity and phylogenetic relationships of European species of Crepidostomum Braun, 1900 (Trematoda: Allocreadiidae) based on rDNA, with special reference to Crepidostomum oschmarini Zhokhov & Pugacheva, 1998

  • 1Email author,
  • 1,
  • 2,
  • 2 and
  • 1
Parasites & Vectors201811:530

https://doi.org/10.1186/s13071-018-3095-y

  • Received: 13 April 2018
  • Accepted: 3 September 2018
  • Published:

Abstract

Background

Within the genus Crepidostomum Braun, 1900, identification of species and taxonomic decisions made only on the basis of adult morphology have resulted in great problems associated with evaluating actual diversity and validity of species. Life-cycle data, while equal in importance to adult characters, are scarce, controversial or incomplete for most Crepidostomum spp. In this study, rDNA sequences generated from adult and larval Crepidostomum spp. and some other allocreadiid species were analysed to reveal the diversity and phylogenetic relationships of the species and their host range. Detailed morphological description based on light microscopy, SEM tegumental surface topography and genetic data are provided for the poorly known trematode C. oschmarini Zhokhov & Pugacheva, 1998 found in the intestine of two teleost fish species, Barbatula barbatula (L.) and Cottus gobio L.

Results

We characterized 27 isolates of adult and larval parasites. Based on newly obtained 28S and ITS1-5.8S-ITS2 rDNA sequences, new intermediate and final hosts were ascertained, and life-cycles clarified for some allocreadiids. New knowledge on the diversity and phylogenetic relationships of European Crepidostomum spp. was gained. The validity of C. oschmarini was verified based on comparative sequence analysis. Ophthalmoxiphidiocercariae of C. oschmarini were recorded in sphaeriid bivalves Pisidium (Euglesa) casertanum (Poli). Additionally, morphological differences between gravid specimens of C. oschmarini and other related species were observed.

Conclusions

Species of the Allocreadiidae parasitizing fishes in Europe are distributed among two monophyletic genera, Allocreadium and Bunodera, and two paraphyletic Crepidostomum clades. A complex of Crepidostomum metoecus (syn. C. nemachilus), C. oschmarini and Crepidostomum sp. 2 clustered in one clade, and a complex of C. farionis, Crepidostomum sp. 1 and, probably, C. wikgreni in the other. Molecular data indicated that C. oschmarini and Crepidostomum sp. 2 presumably have a wide geographical distribution in Europe. The new data provided evidence that Crepidostomum is a more diverse genus than can be judged from morphological data and host switching in this genus may occur independently of fish-host phylogeny.

Keywords

  • Crepidostomum oschmarini
  • ITS2 rDNA
  • 28S
  • Molecular phylogeny
  • Life-cycles
  • Tegumental topography
  • Morphology
  • Stone loach Barbatula barbatula
  • European bullhead Cottus gobio

Background

Trematodes of the genus Crepidostomum Braun, 1900 are common parasites in the intestine of freshwater teleosts in the Holarctic [1, 2]. Including many nominal species, the taxonomy of this genus still lacks clarity and the actual diversity and validity of some species is still questioned. Although most taxonomic decisions have been made based on adult morphology, it should be noted that a number of species are morphologically very similar and there exist only a few morphological features useful for distinguishing species [3, 4]. Crepidostomum farionis (Müller, 1784) and C. metoecus Braun, 1900 are among the most common and widely distributed freshwater parasites of salmonid fishes in Europe. Occasionally they are also found in Cottus spp. (Cottidae), Barbatula barbatula (L.) (Nemacheilidae) and some other fishes [57]. Reliable features for differentiating these two species were obtained only in the second half of the 20th century (see [7]) and formerly C. metoecus was frequently mistaken for C. farionis. Additionally, both species have been known by numerous synonyms (see [1, 8]). Prior to the present study, C. farionis and C. metoecus were the only representatives of the genus to have been recorded in Lithuania and neighboring regions [6, 9].

Crepidostomum oschmarini Zhokhov & Pugacheva, 1998 was described from the stone loach Barbatula barbatula (as Nemacheilus barbatulus) (Nemacheilidae) from the small Sutki River in the upper Volga River basin, Russia [10]. Later, the validity of this species was questioned based on a comparative study of the morphological variability of Crepidostomum spp., and C. oschmarini was synonymized with C. metoecus [11]. However, the definitive hosts of C. metoecus (salmonid fishes), have never been found in the Sutki River and the exact taxonomic status of C. oschmarini remained unresolved. Here, we re-visit the taxonomic status of C. oshmarini based on material from a new host, the European bullhead Cottus gobio (Cottidae, Scorpaeniformes), collected in the Il’d River, Russia. The main purpose of this study was to gain new knowledge on the diversity and phylogenetic relationships of European Crepidostomum spp. and to determine whether C. oschmarini and C. metoecus are distinct or synonymous by comparing the 5.8S-ITS2 rDNA cluster and partial 28S rDNA gene sequences, as well as to investigate the phylogenetic relationships of C. oschmarini within the Allocreadiidae. In addition to the molecular evidence provided, a detailed morphological study of C. oschmarini based on light and scanning electron microscopy (SEM) was accomplished. Despite the small number of studies on SEM morphology of Crepidostomum spp. it has been demonstrated that some surface features, such as the distribution of sensory endings, may provide additional specific characters for their identification [1, 7, 12, 13].

Life-cycle data and larval characters are equal in importance to adult characters for resolving some difficulties in taxonomy [1, 14]. Unfortunately, data for cercariae are lacking or incomplete for most ‘recognized’ Crepidostomum species [1]. Bivalves rather than gastropods are utilized as first intermediate hosts [2]. Known allocreadiid cercariae belong to the ophthalmoxiphidiocercariae type (i.e. with eye-spots and stylet) and develop in rediae [2]. The development of Crepidostomum farionis was elucidated by Brown [15]. Larval stages of C. metoecus were studied and described by Stenko [16] in Crimea (River Burulcha). The sphaeriid clam Pisidium (Euglesa) casertanum (Poli) was recorded as the first intermediate host, while larvae of the ephemeropteran Ameletus sp. served as the second intermediate host in experimental infection. Meanwhile, Awachie [17] found that the gastropod Radix peregra (O. F. Müller) (as Lymnaea peregra) serves as the first intermediate host for C. metoecus in North Wales and cercariae encysted in the amphipod Gammarus pulex (L.) as the second intermediate host (cercariae of allocreadiids encyst in aquatic arthropods). Due to this discrepancy between the two studies, it is likely that the authors were in fact dealing with different species.

The identification of intramolluscan stages of trematodes using morphological characters alone is difficult given their overall body plasticity and small size in relation to their complexity. The descriptions of cercariae of many related species render them morphologically indistinguishable. With molecular genetic methods having become standard practice for parasite identification, molecular data have become essential for matching different stages of digenean life-cycles. However, not a single life-cycle of a Crepidostomum species has been proven by molecular methods and only recently has a molecular study on trematodes in a sub-Arctic lake provided some molecular data on the diversity of developmental stages of some Crepidostomum spp. and their hosts in Europe [18].

During a parasite study of sphaeriid bivalves collected from different populations in Lithuania, Crimea and Norway, we found clams naturally infected with rediae and ophthalmoxiphidiocercariae consistent with the diagnosis and descriptions for allocreadiid cercariae. In the present study, rDNA markers of larval and adult allocreadiid stages were obtained and compared to known rDNA markers available for allocreadiid trematodes with the aim to clarify life-cycles, host specificity and phylogenetic relationships.

Methods

Adult specimens of C. oschmarini were recovered from the intestine of B. barbatula and C. gobio. The fish hosts were caught in the Il’d River in the upper Volga River basin, Russia. Specimens of a few other adult allocreadiids, i.e. Allocreadium isoporum (Looss, 1894), Bunodera luciopercae (Müller, 1776) and Crepidostomum sp. 1 sensu Soldánová et al. (2017) [18], were recovered from fish hosts in Lithuania and Norway. Naturally infected sphaeriid clams were collected from different freshwater bodies in Lithuania, Norway and Crimea using hand-nets. The developmental stages of the allocreadiid species used in this study, their hosts, their sampling locality, and the GenBank accession numbers for the corresponding sequences, are presented in the Table 1.
Table 1

Species subjected to molecular phylogenetic analysis with information for hosts, localities and GenBank accession numbers

Species

Host

Locality

GenBank IDb [Reference]

28S

ITS2

Allocreadium sp.a (= Crepidostomum sp.)

Sphaerium corneum

Ukraine: River Belka, Dnieper River basin

GU462121 [44]

FJ874919 [44]

Allocreadium sp.a

Pisidium amnicum

Russia: River Tvertsa, upper Volga River basin

 

FJ874923 [44]

Allocreadium gotoi

Misgurnus anguillicaudatus

Japan: Nagano, Iiyama, Midori

LC215274 [61]

 

Allocreadium isoporum

Alburnus alburnus

Russia: Lake Oster, Karelia

GU462125, GU462126 [44]

FJ874921 [44]

Allocreadium isoporum

Barbatula barbatula

Russia: River Il’d, upper Volga River basin

MH143102

MH143096

Allocreadium lobatum

Semotilus corporalis

USA: Moosehead Lake, Maine

EF032693 [62]

 

Allocreadium neotenicum

Hydroporus rufifrons

United Kingdom: Lake District, Cumbria

JX977132 [43]

 

Allocreadium neotenicum

Oreodytes sanmarkii

Norway: Lake Takvatn

KY513133 [18]

 

Allocreadium neotenicum a

Pisidium casertanum

Ukraine: River Burulcha, Crimea

MH143103

MH143075

Allocreadium neotenicum a

P. casertanum

Norway: Lake Takvatn

MH143104

MH143076

Allocreadium neotenicum a

Pisidium sp.

Norway: Lake Nordersjoen

MH143105

MH143077

Auriculostoma sp.

Astyanax mexicanus

Mexico: Filipinas, Veracruz

 

KF631425, KF631426 [63]

Auriculostoma astyanace

Astyanax aeneus

Costa Rica: Tempisquito River, Guanacaste

HQ833707 [64]

 

Auriculostoma lobata

Brycon guatemalensis

Mexico: Mangal Lagoon, Tabasco

KX954172 [51]

 

Bunodera sp.

Perca flavescens

USA: Steamboat Lake

HQ833704 [64]

 

Bunodera acerinae

Gymnocephalus cernuus

Russia: Lake Segozero, Karelia

GU462114 [44]

FJ874914 [44]

Bunodera acerinae a

P. amnicum

Russia: River Tvertsa, upper Volga River basin

GU462112, GU462113, GU462122 [44]

FJ874911 [44]

Bunodera luciopercae

Perca fluviatilis

Lithuania: Curonian Lagoon

MH143101

MH143097

Bunodera luciopercae

P. fluviatilis

Russia: Lake Segozero, Karelia

GU462115 [44]

FJ874917 [44]

Bunodera luciopercae

P. fluviatilis

Russia: River Tvertsa, upper Volga River basin

GU462123 [44]

FJ874918 [44]

Bunodera luciopercae a

Sphaerium rivicola

Lithuania: dammed up River Nemunas near Kaunas

GU462116 [44]

FJ874916 [44]

Bunodera luciopercae a

S. rivicola

Ukraine: River Teterev

GU462111 [44]

FJ874915 [44]

Cercariaeum crassum a

P. amnicum

Lithuania: River Ūla

GU462120 [65]

JF261148 [65]

Crepidostomum sp. 1a

Sphaerium sp.

Norway: Lake Takvatn

KY513149 [18]

 

Crepidostomum sp. 1a

Siphlonurus lacustris

Norway: Lake Takvatn

KY513150 [18]

 

Crepidostomum sp. 1

Salmo trutta

Norway: Lake Sagelvvatn

MH143111, MH143112

MH143080, MH143082

Crepidostomum sp. 1a

P. casertanum

Norway: Lake Sagelvvatn

MH143113, MH143114

MH143078, MH143081, MH143086

Crepidostomum sp. 1a

Pisidium sp.

Norway: Lake Sagelvvatn

MH143107, MH143108

MH143084, MH143085

Crepidostomum sp. 1a

Sphaerium nitidum

Norway: Lake Kykkelvatn

MH143106, MH143109, MH143110

MH143079, MH143083

Crepidostomum sp. 2a

P. casertanum

Ukraine: River Burulcha, Crimea

MH143117, MH143118, MH143119

MH143098, MH143099, MH143100

Crepidostomum sp. 2a

P. casertanum

Norway: Lake Sagelvvatn

MH143115, MH143116

MH143087, MH143088, MH143089

Crepidostomum sp. 2

S. trutta

Norway: Lake Takvatn

KY513154 [18]

 

Crepidostomum sp. 2

S. lacustris

Norway: Lake Takvatn

KY513151 [18]

 

Crepidostomum sp. 2

Diura bicaudata

Norway: Lake Takvatn

KY513152 [18]

 

Crepidostomum affine

Hiodon tergisus

USA: Pearl River, Mississippi

KF250358 [4]

 

Crepidostomum affine

Aplodinotus grunniens

USA: Pearl River, Mississippi

 

KF356363 [4]

Acrolichanus (= Crepidostomum) auriculatum

Acipenser schrenkii

Russian Far East

FR821371 [30]

 

Crepidostomum auritum

Aplodinotus grunniens

USA: Pearl River, Mississippi

KF250357 [4]

KF356373 [4]

Crepidostomum cornutum

Lepomis gulosus

USA: Pascagoula River, Mississippi

EF032695 [62]

KF356374 [4]

Crepidostomum farionis a

P. casertanum

Norway: Lake Takvatn

KY513139 [18]

 

Crepidostomum farionis

Pisidium sp.

Norway: Lake Takvatn

KY513136 [18]

 

Crepidostomum farionis

Oncorhynchus masou

Russian Far East

FR821399, FR821402 [30]

 

Crepidostomum illinoiense

Hiodon alosoides

USA: Red Lake River,Minnesota

KF356372 [4]

KF356364 [4]

Crepidostomum metoecus

Salvelinus leucomaensis

Russian Far East

FR821405, FR821406 [30]

 

Crepidostomum metoecus (= Crepidostomum nemachilus)

Barbatula toni

Russian Far East

FR821408, FR821409 [30]

 

Crepidostomum metoecus

S. trutta

Norway: Lake Takvatn

KY513148 [18]

 

Crepidostomum metoecus

P. casertanum

Norway: Lake Takvatn

KY513140 [18]

 

Crepidostomum metoecus

Gammarus lacustris

Norway: Lake Takvatn

KY513141 [18]

 

Crepidostomum oshmarini

B. barbatula

Russia: River Il’d, upper Volga River basin

MH159990, MH159992

MH143094, MH143095

Crepidostomum oshmarini

Cottus gobio

Russia: River Il’d, upper Volga River basin

MH159989, MH159991

MH143090, MH143091

Crepidostomum oshmarini a

P. casertanum

Lithuania: River Nedzingė

MH159993, MH159994

MH143092, MH143093

Creptotrema funduli

Fundulus notatus

USA: Mississippi, Biloxi River, Harrison County

JQ425256 [66]

 

Creptotrematina aguirrepequenoi

A. aeneus

Costa Rica: Rio Tempisquito, Guanacaste

HQ833708 [64]

 

Phyllodistomum folium

Gymnocephalus cernuus

Lithuania: Curonian Lagoon

KX957729 [46]

KY307885 [46]

Phyllodistomum angulatum

Sander lucioperca

Russia: Rybinsk water reservoir on the Volga river

KX957735 [46]

KJ740511 [46]

Phyllodistomum macrocotyle a

Dreissena polymorpha

Belarus: Lake Lepelskoe

AY288828 [67]

AY288831 [67]

aSequences from larval stages

bSequences generated in the present study are indicated in bold

Adult trematodes were collected live from freshly killed fish. For molecular studies, the worms were rinsed in saline before being stored at 4 °C in 96% ethanol. Subsamples of the material for the morphological studies were fixed live in hot 10% buffered formalin. A total of 25 adult and gravid specimens of C. oschmarini (15 specimens from B. barbatula and 10 from C. gobio) were used for light microscopy examination. All measurements are in micrometres and are given as the range followed by the mean in parentheses.

For scanning electron microscopy, 19 live specimens of C. oschmarini from B. barbatula were fixed in 2.5% glutaraldehyde in 0.1 M phosphate buffer (pH 7.3) for 15 days at 4 °C. After washing in phosphate buffer, fixed worms were dehydrated though a graded ethanol series and acetone. They were then critical-point dried with liquid CO2 and mounted on stubs, sputter-coated with gold-palladium and examined using a JEOL JSM 6510LV scanning electron microscope (SEM) operating at 30 kV.

Genomic DNA was extracted from individual ethanol-fixed specimens following the protocol of Stunžėnas et al. [19] with a slight modification described in Petkevičiūtė et al. [20]. DNA fragments spanning the 3' end of the 5.8S rRNA gene, the complete internal transcribed spacer 2 region (ITS2) and a small section at the 5' end of the 28S gene were amplified using universal primers for flatworms, the forward primer 3S (5'-CGG TGG ATC ACT CGG CTC GTG-3') [21] and the reverse primer ITS2.2 (5'-CCT GGT TAG TTT CTT TTC CTC CGC-3') [22]. Using a new primer pair designed for species of the Allocreadiidae, the end of the internal transcribed spacer 1 (ITS1), the complete 5.8S rDNA and ITS2, also a small section at the 5' end of the 28S gene were amplified using the forward primer AlJe-F (5'-GTC TGG CTT GGC AGT TCT A-3') and the reverse primer AlJe-R (5'-CTG CCC AAT TTG ACC AAG C-3'). A fragment at the 5' end of the 28S rRNA gene was amplified using the forward primers Digl2 (5'-AAG CAT ATC ACT AAG CGG-3') or ZX-1 (5'-ACC CGC TGA ATT TAA GCA TAT-3') [23] and the reverse primers L0 (5'-GCT ATC CTG AG (AG) GAA ACT TCG-3') [24] or 1500R (5'-GCT ATC CTG AGG GAA ACT TCG-3') [25, 26]. Amplification protocols are as described in Petkevičiūtė et al. [20]. The amplification protocol for the newly designed primers AlJe-F and AlJe-R is identical as for the primer pair Digl2-L0. PCR products were purified and sequenced in both directions at BaseClear B.V. (Leiden, Netherlands) using the PCR primers. Contiguous sequences were assembled using Sequencher 4.7 software (Gene Codes Corporation, Ann Arbor, USA). Sequences generated in this study have been deposited in the GenBank database (see accession numbers in Table 1).

Additional rDNA sequences for species of the Allocreadiidae and outgroup taxa (Table 1) were downloaded from GenBank and included in pairwise sequence comparisons and phylogenetic analyses. For phylogenetic analyses, the sequences were aligned using multiple sequence alignment software MAFFT version 7 [27] with iterative refinement method of G-INS-i. The best-fit model of sequence evolution for phylogenetic analysis was estimated using jModeltest v.0.1.1 software [28]. Maximum likelihood (ML) phylogenetic trees were obtained and analyzed using MEGA v.6 [29]. Branch support was estimated by bootstrap analyses with 1000 pseudoreplicates. The ML trees were obtained using the general time reversible model with a gamma distribution rate and a proportion of invariant sites (GTR + G + I) for both the ITS2 and the 28S gene datasets. Gamma shape and the number of invariant sites were estimated from the data. Parsimony analysis based on subtree pruning and regrafting (SPR) was used with default parsimony settings. If two or more sequences belonged to one species, they were collapsed into one branch, except those newly obtained in this study. Estimates of mean evolutionary divergence over sequence pairs within and between groups were calculated using MEGA v.6.

Results

Family Allocreadiidae Looss, 1902

Genus Crepidostomum Braun, 1900

Crepidostomum oschmarini Zhokhov & Pugacheva, 1998

Type-host: Barbatula barbatula (L.) (Cypriniformes: Nemacheilidae).

Other host: Cottus gobio L. (Scorpaeniformes: Cottidae).

Type-locality: River Sutki, Il’d River (the upper Volga River basin), Russia.

Site in host: Intestine.

First intermediate host: Pisidium (Euglesa) casertanum (Poli) (Veneroida: Sphaeriidae).

Voucher material: Four voucher specimens ex C. gobio on 2 slides [No. 1/9(6–7)] and 6 voucher specimens ex B. barbatula on 2 slides [(No. 1/9(10–11)] were deposited in the Parasite Collection of the Institute for Biology of Inland Waters RAS, Russia.

Representative DNA sequences: ITS2 rDNA (MH143090-MH143095); 28S rDNA (MH159989-MH159994) (see also Table 1).

Description

[Based on 25 ovigerous worms; Fig. 1, Table 2.] Body elongate-oval, spindle-shaped, only slightly dorsoventrally flattened, with bluntly rounded extremities, 1332–1872 (1561) long, with maximum width at level of ventral sucker, 225–396 (284) (Fig. 1a, b). Body width to body length ratio 1:4.4–8.2 (5.8); forebody 270–369 (320) long; hindbody 909–1458 (1229) long, forebody to hindbody length ratio 1:3–4.5 (1:3.9). Tegument smooth. Eye-spot pigment present in all specimens, usually solid, rarely dispersed. Oral sucker ventro-terminal, 136–222 × 143–210 (180 × 168), provided with 6 muscular lobes arranged in ventro-lateral, dorso-median and dorso-lateral pairs; lobes approximately equal in size and well-separated at their bases. Pre-oral lobe very short, 22–44 (29). Ventral sucker round, scyphoid, semi-embedded, almost equal in size to oral sucker, 163–234 × 156–288 (191 × 197); sucker width ratio 1–1.6 (1.3). Prepharynx short; pharynx muscular, elongate-oval, 55–101 × 68–92 (77 × 76); oesophagus short, 15–44 (26); intestinal bifurcation immediately posterior to pharynx, at approximately mid-way between suckers; caeca long, terminating blindly near posterior extremity of body.
Fig. 1
Fig. 1

Crepidostomum oschmarini. a Whole-mount ventral view, ex Barbatula barbatula. b Whole-mount ventral view, ex Cottus gobio. c Terminal genitalia. Scale-bars: a, b, 200 μm; c, 100 μm

Table 2

Measurements (in μm) of Crepidostomum oschmarini from Barbatula barbatula (n = 15) and Cottus gobio (n = 10)

Host species

Barbatula barbatula

Cottus gobio

Variable

Range

Mean

Range

Mean

Body length

1332–1800

1432

1476–1872

1652

Maximum body width

264–396

309

225–300

263

Body width/length

4.4–8.2

5.1

4.9–8

6.4

Forebody length

270–342

305

297–369

334

Hindbody length

909–1300

1150

1170–1458

1307

Hindbody/forebody length

3–4.3

3.8

3.6–4.5

4

Pre-oral lobe length

22–66

44

22–44

29

Oral sucker length

136–189

156

180–222

201

Oral sucker width

143–185

154

144–210

180

Muscular lobes length

40–46

43

46–68

57

Muscular lobes width

22–24

23

22–35

29

Pharynx length

55–90

71

68–101

83

Pharynx width

68–77

73

68–92

79

Oesophagus length

26–44

33

15–26

20

Ventral sucker length

163–222

184

165–234

197

Ventral sucker width

156–288

203

165–228

192

Ovary length

92–136

113

128–176

155

Ovary width

99–139

112

121–163

138

Seminal receptacle length

55–59

57

46–82

57

Seminal receptacle width

44–73

59

55–99

74

Vitelline reservoir length

59–92

72

55–82

70

Vitelline reservoir width

79–99

87

57–110

76

Anterior testis length

158–233

183

216–246

235

Anterior testis width

121–209

156

130–198

170

Posterior testis length

176–242

200

222–330

262

Posterior testis width

132–220

163

132–210

178

Seminal vesicle length

66–209

146

66–143

109

Seminal vesicle width

44–88

70

30–66

47

Cirrus-sac length

244–420

332

242–450

322

Cirrus-sac width

48–82

71

48–77

60

Egg length

48–68

58

33–70

60

Egg width

26–35

32

29–37

34

Ventral sucker/oral sucker width

1–1.6

1.3

0.9–1.4

1.1

Oral sucker/pharynx length

1.9–2.6

2.2

2.2–2.8

2.5

No. of eggs

4–26

11

4–14

9

Testes 2, oval or globular, tandem, entire, contiguous or slightly separated; near middle of hindbody. Anterior testis 158–246 × 121–209 (210 × 164), smaller than posterior testis, latter 176–330 × 132–220 (233 × 171). Cirrus-sac elongate, well developed, 242–450 × 48–82 (327 × 66), with anterior end curved ventrally posterior to ventral sucker (Fig. 1c), extends posteriorly from level of intestinal bifurcation to ovarian region (up to posterior margin of ovary); contains coiled seminal vesicle, pars prostatica and ejaculatory duct. Seminal vesicle elongated, variable in size. Pars prostatica rectilinear, near middle of cirrus-sac; prostatic cells sparse, surround pars prostatica and extend throughout anterior half of cirrus-sac. Cirrus tubular, unarmed, 183–198 in length (n = 2). Genital atrium absent. Common genital pore median, between pharynx and ventral sucker, typically at level of intestinal bifurcation.

Ovary subspherical, entire, usually about equidistant between ventral sucker and anterior testis, dextrally or sinistrally submedian or in some specimens median, 92–176 × 99–163 (135 × 126). Proximal female genitalia not clearly observed. Seminal receptacle discerned in some specimens, 46–82 × 44–99 (57 × 66), rounded or somewhat transversely-elongate, immediately posterior to ovary. Uterus short, coiled between anterior testis and ventral sucker, overlapping ovary ventrally, only rarely extending slightly into testicular region; runs ventral to male duct; opens through common genital pore ventrally to male duct. Eggs not numerous, 4–26 (10 on average), operculate, thin-shelled, elongate-oval, 33–70 × 26–37 (59 × 33).

Vitellarium follicular, follicles in 2 lateral fields from level of posterior margin of pharynx to almost posterior extremity of body; fields sparsely confluent dorsally and ventrally in anterior caecal field, confluent dorsally and ventrally in post-testicular region, slightly overlapping testes, but not encroaching laterally between testes; no follicles present dorsal to ovary. Vitelline reservoir large, 55–92 × 57–110 (71 × 82), between ovary and anterior testis. Excretory vesicle tubular, elongate, I-shaped, reaches anterior margin of anterior testis. Excretory pore subterminal.

Remarks

The specimens of C. oschmarini from B. barbatula are similar to those from C. gobio except in some morphological details that we do not consider to be of taxonomic importance. The worms from C. gobio have larger values for body length, body width to length ratio, oral sucker, muscular lobes on the oral sucker, pharynx, ovary, testes and eggs than the worms from B. barbatula. Crepidostomum oschmarini from B. barbatula also differs from the worms from C. gobio in the more rounded shape of testes.

Four species of the genus Crepidostomum (C. metoecus, C. farionis, C. latum, C. wikgreni) have been recorded from freshwater fishes in Europe. Here we do not consider C. auriculatum as this species is a specific parasite of sturgeons [1, 5] and appears to be much closer to Bunodera spp. than to its congeners in 28S rDNA based molecular phylogenies ([18, 30], present study). The following species can be readily distinguished from C. oschmarini.

Crepidostomum metoecus differs in the larger size of the body and cirrus-sac, smaller hindbody to forebody length ratio of 1:2.2, longer oesophagus, larger number of eggs in uterus, 8–79 (mean 30) [1], and in the position of the genital pore (posterior to intestinal bifurcation) [1, 31]. The ovigerous worms from central Europe lack eye-spot pigment [3134], the worms from Britain, Japan and USA have small scattered eye-spot pigment [1, 8, 35].

Crepidostomum farionis differs in the much larger size of the body, suckers, pharynx and eggs, and in having a much longer oesophagus and cirrus-sac, smaller forebody to hindbody length ratio of 1:2.5, as well as in the possession of separate genital pores which open anterior to the intestinal bifurcation [1, 36]. The ovigerous worms lack eye-spot pigment in the forebody [33, 34, 3739], or eye-spot pigment is small and scattered [1, 8, 35, 40]. The uterus in C. farionis often extends into the testicular region (up to middle of anterior testes), the excretory vesicle is Y-shaped and eggs are numerous, up to 230 [34, 37, 38].

Crepidostomum latum Pigulewsky, 1931 has a wider body with a much shorter forebody and much larger size of eggs [41]. It differs from C. oschmarini by its shorter S-shaped cirrus-sac not reaching the posterior margin of the ventral sucker; shorter lateral fields of the vitellarium reaching anterior to the posterior margin of the ventral sucker; uterus extending into testicular region and lateral fields around the ventral sucker; testes which are almost equal in size.

Crepidostomum wikgreni is closest to C. oschmarini from which can be distinguished by its larger size of the body, pharynx, ventral sucker, ovary, testes, eggs, and in having a much longer oesophagus and shorter cirrus-sac and a specific microhabitat in the host (gall-bladder). Additionally, the ovigerous worms lack eye-spot pigment, the common genital pore is pre-bifurcal and the number of eggs in uterus is larger than in C. oschmarini (< 50 [42]).

The main morphological difference distinguishing C oschmarini from the species listed above is the eye-spot pigment in the forebody; this character was clearly present in all specimens. Furthermore, the very short oesophagus differentiates C. oschmarini from its congeners parasitizing salmonid fish hosts.

Tegumental topography of Crepidostomum oschmarini

Under SEM, the ventral and dorsal tegumental surface of C. oschmarini is unarmed and possesses transverse ridges (Figs. 2a and 3c, f). The presence of cobblestone-like protrusions on the body surface was apparent at a higher magnification (Fig. 3g). The anterior extremity of the body bears a ventro-terminal oral sucker provided with six protruding, muscular lobes (Fig. 2a, c, d). These lobes are arranged in three symmetrical pairs, ventro-lateral, dorso-lateral and dorso-median (Fig. 2c, d). The dorso-median and dorso-lateral lobes are approximately equal in size, whereas the ventro-lateral lobes are slightly wider. As they are continuous with the margin of the oral sucker, the anterior region of the ventro-lateral lobes form the anterior part of the oral sucker rim (Fig. 2b-c). There are numerous sensory endings in the form of so-called “papillae and minute sensory receptors” [1, 7, 12] on the oral sucker rim, around the oral sucker rim and along the interlobular field dorsally to the oral sucker (Fig. 2b-d). Five papillate sensory endings (c.6.5 μm in diameter) occur evenly spaced, about 40 μm apart from each other, and consistently associated with the posterior portion of the oral sucker rim (Fig. 2b, c). Underneath the ventro-lateral papilla of the oral sucker, groups of 8 papillae are visible on either side of the rim (Fig. 2c, f). In all of the specimens studied, there is a constant pattern of 3 pairs of symmetrical papillae, which vary in size, located at the middle of the anterior rim of the oral sucker (Fig. 2b-d, e). On each side of this symmetrical arrangement, the posteriormost papilla (c.7 μm in diameter) is situated about 5 μm from the middle papilla (c.4.5 μm in diameter), which, in turn, is situated about 4 μm from anteriormost papilla (c.3.5 μm in diameter) (Fig. 2e). The distance between posteriormost papillae on each side is 21 μm, between the middle papillae 32 μm and between anteriormost papillae 17 μm (Fig. 2e). An additional papilla (c.4.5 μm in diameter) is situated on the surface of each vento-lateral lobe (Fig. 2d, g). Two kinds of sensory endings, papillate and non-papillate, are scattered irregularly on the interlobular field of the body (Fig. 2c, d). A group of non-papillate sensory endings occurs close to the 3 pairs of symmetrical papillae (Fig. 2d). Variability exists in the numbers and arrangement of additional papillae in this region (Fig. 2c, d). Not far from the margins of the dorso-lateral lobes, groups of 3–5 papillae are present (Fig. 2d, h); furthermore, between the ventro-lateral and dorso-lateral lobes, 6 papillae and 3–5 non-papillate sensory endings are apparent (Fig. 2d). Non-papillate sensory endings are also present close to the margins of the dorso-median lobes. All of the sensory endings (papillate and non-papillate) on the anterior body surface are ciliate receptors (Fig. 2i, j).
Fig. 2
Fig. 2

SEM micrographs of the surface topography of the anterior region of the body of Crepidostomum oschmarini. a Ventral view of mature worm. b The constant pattern of 5 papillae on the posterior rim of the oral sucker, 3 symmetrical pairs of papillae in the middle of the anterior rim (white circle) and a group of 8 papillae underneath the sucker rim (black circle). c 3 paired symmetrical papillae (white circle) and the distribution of irregular papillae on the anterior rim. d Interlobular field with marked (white circle) of 6 symmetrical papillae, irregular papillate and non-papillate sensory endings and single papilla on each ventro-lateral lobe (black circles). e Regular pattern of different sizes of the posteriormost, middle and anteriormost pairs of 6 symmetrical papillae on anterior rim. f Regular arrangement of 8 papillae ventro-lateral to the posterior sucker rim (black circle). g Single papilla (black circle) on the surface of a ventro-lateral lobe. h Papillae close to the base of a dorso-lateral lobe. i Ciliated papillate and non-papillate sensory endings on interlobular field. j Ciliated papilla. Abbreviations: ap, anteriormost papilla; c, cilium; cr, cirrus; dll, dorso-lateral lobe; dml, dorso-median lobe; fp, forebody papillae; hb, hindbody; ep, excretory pore; l, lobe; mp, middle papilla; np, non-papillate sensory ending; oa, oral aperture; os, oral sucker; p, ciliated papilla; pp, posteriormost papilla; pr, posterior rim of oral sucker; tr, transverse tegumental ridges; vll, ventro-lateral lobe; vs, ventral sucker

Fig. 3
Fig. 3

SEM micrographs of the surface topography of the forebody and hindbody of Crepidostomum oschmarini. a Two symmetrical longitudinal fields of papillae (white circles), the protruded cirrus and the ventral sucker on the forebody. b Ciliated and dome-shaped sensory endings in the two longitudinal fields of papillae. c Ventral sucker with 6 dome-shaped papillae on its rim (white circles). d Radially arranged surface corrugations on the rim of the ventral sucker and the dome-shaped papillae. e Dome-shaped papilla (white circle) on the ventral sucker rim. f Posterior extremity of the body with the terminal excretory pore. g Cobblestone-like protrusions of the body surface. Abbreviations: cp, cobblestone-like protrusion; cr, cirrus; dp, dome-shaped papilla; ep, excretory pore; lp, lateral papilla; p, ciliated papilla; pe, elevation around genital pore; tr, transverse tegumental ridges; vs, ventral sucker

The ventral sucker is protruded ventrally. Its rim exhibits surface corrugations arranged radially (Fig. 3d) and bears six large dome-shaped papillae (c.5.5 μm in diameter) regularly distributed around the rim (Fig. 3c-e).

The common genital pore is median between the two suckers (Fig. 5a, c); no tegumental papillae were observed around the genital pore (Fig. 3b-d). The tegument around the genital pore may form a weak elevation at the base of the everted cirrus (Fig. 3b, c). The surface of the cirrus is smooth (Fig. 3d). Everted cirrus was observed, measuring between 65–160 μm in length at different degrees of evagination (Fig. 3a, c, d).

Papillae are present on the forebody surface but are more abundant ventrally; they exhibit a tendency for bilateral symmetry (Fig. 3a, b). A gathering of ciliated and dome-shaped papillate sensory endings, arranged in two longitudinal, symmetrical rows, occurs on the ventral surface between the oral and ventral suckers (Fig. 3b). There are also a few papillae present in ventro-lateral and dorso-lateral areas of the forebody (Fig. 3a). The hindbody lacks papillae (Figs. 2a, 3f). Situated at the posterior extremity of the body is the excretory pore (Fig. 3f).

Molecular differentiation and phylogenetic analysis

Two genetically different Crepidostomum cercariae were collected from P. casertanum in Lake Sagelvvatn in Norway, corresponding to Crepidostomum sp. 1 and Crepidostomum sp. 2 sensu Soldánová et al. (2017) [18] recorded in Lake Takvatn, Norway. One of these isolates was genetically identical to the metacercariae of Crepidostomum sp. 2 ex mayfly Siphlonurus lacustris and to adult ex Salmo trutta [18]. In Crimea, Crepidostomum sp. cercariae were found in P. casertanum collected in the River Burulcha. This cercaria has been described previously as the larva of C. metoecus [16], although the divergence between these two species ranged between 0.6–0.7% (7–8 bp) in the alignment of the 28S gene. The divergence between the Crimean Crepidostomum sp. and the sub-Artic Crepidostomum sp. 2 can be regarded as intraspecific, with 2–3 bp (0.2–0.3%) difference in the 28S and only 1 bp (0.16%) in the 5.8S-ITS2.

Adult Crepidostomum specimens obtained from S. trutta in Lake Sagelvvatn were genetically identical to samples of cercariae from P. casertanum and Pisidium sp. collected in this lake and from Sphaerium nitidum in Lake Kykkelvatn. The sequences of the 28S rRNA gene obtained from all of these samples were identical to Crepidostomum sp. 1 samples collected from Sphaerium sp. and S. lacustris in Lake Takvatn [18]. Intraspecific variation was detected in Lake Sagelvvatn, but only a single nucleotide in the ITS2 was different in one specimen from S. trutta and in one isolate from Pisidium sp.; also this site was heterozygotic in one sample from P. casertanum, obviously as a result of hybridization of two genetically different lineages.

The newly generated rDNA sequences of C. oschmarini sampled from B. barbatula and C. gobio in Russia, and from P. casertanum in Lithuania were identical. The 28S sequences were aligned with those of closely related species in an alignment of 1150 bp. The divergence between C. oschmarini and C. metoecus was 8 and 9 bp (0.7–0.8%), the divergence between C. oschmarini and the sub-Arctic Crepidostomum sp. 2 was 11 and 12 bp (0.96–1%). However, C. oschmarini was less different from the Crimean Crepidostomum sp. 2 (9 bp, 0.8%).

Some specimens of P. casertanum, collected in the River Burulcha and in Lake Takvatn, Norway, as well as Pisidium sp. from Lake Nordersjoen, were infected with Allocreadium neotenicum. All samples were genetically identical. In a 28S alignment of 1150 bp, no nucleotide differences were detected between our samples and A. neotenicum collected from the dytiscid beetles Oreodytes sanmarkii and Hydroporus rufifrons in the sub-Arctic Lake Takvatn and the Lake District in Cumbria, UK, respectively [18, 43].

New rDNA sequences were obtained for A. isoporum, collected from B. barbatula in the upper Volga River basin, Russia. These sequences were identical to rDNA of A. isoporum collected from Alburnus alburnus in Lake Oster, Karelia, Russia [44], with one difference in a single nucleotide of the ITS2.

New rDNA sequences were obtained for B. luciopercae, collected from Perca fluviatilis in the Curonian Lagoon, Lithuania. The divergence between sequences from this specimen and sequences of B. luciopercae specimens from a previous study [44] was 2 and 3 bp in a 28S alignment of 1067 bp and only 1 bp in the ITS2 alignment of 394 bp.

The newly obtained sequences and relevant allocreadiid sequences of ITS2 rDNA and partial 28S rDNA from the GenBank database were used for phylogenetic analysis. Alignment of the ITS2 and partial 28S data yielded 394 and 1050 characters for analysis, respectively.

Phylogenetic analyses of the ITS2 and 28S datasets produced several strongly supported clades and some weakly or not supported clades in both phylogenetic trees (Figs. 4, 5). Adult C. oschmarini from two fish species, B. barbatula and C. gobio, and allocreadiid cercariae from the sphaeriid bivalve P. casertanum, formed a strongly supported monophyletic subclade (Figs. 4, 5). Sub-Arctic Crepidostomum sp. 2 together with Crimean Crepidostomum sp. formed the other subclade. These two subclades nested in to a well-supported monophyletic clade; in the 28S tree C. metoecus is included into this clade. Crepidostomum sp. 1 formed the other monophyletic clade (Fig. 5); in the 28S tree, together with C. farionis (Fig. 4). This clade was nested as sister to the clade formed by C. oschmarini + Crepidostomum sp. 2 + C. metoecus but the relationship was not supported (Fig. 4). Unfortunately, ITS2 data for C. metoecus and for C. farionis are not yet available. Nearctic Crepidostomum species nested into a separate monophyletic clade together with species from the allocreadiid genera Auriculostoma and Creptotrematina in the two trees and, additionally, with Creptotrema and Paracreptotrematoides in the 28S tree. Species of Allocreadium, as well as species of Bunodera, nested into two separate monophyletic clades (Figs. 4, 5). However, the relationships among all these clades showed some differences in the different trees. In the 28S rDNA tree, all these clades and the branch of Acrolichanus auriculatum were united into one strongly supported main clade, but did not form supported higher-level clades inside the main clade. The main difference between the ITS2 and 28S rDNA trees was in the relationships of Crepidostomum species. In the ITS2 tree, the strongly supported clade of Nearctic Crepidostomum spp. and the clade of C. oschmarini-Crepidostomum sp. 2 nested into a well-supported higher-level clade (Fig. 5), while in the 28S tree (Fig. 4), the clade of Nearctic Crepidostomum spp. was not strongly supported and its relationships with other clades of Crepidostomum was not supported.
Fig 4
Fig 4

Phylogenetic tree based on Maximum Likelihood analysis of partial sequences of the 28S nuclear rRNA gene. Bootstrap support values lower than 70% are not shown. GenBank accession numbers of sequences in collapsed clades are provided in Table 1. The species sequenced in this study are indicated in bold

Fig. 5
Fig. 5

Phylogenetic tree based on maximum likelihood analysis of the ITS2 nuclear rDNA region. Bootstrap support values lower than 70% are not shown. GenBank accession numbers of sequences in collapsed clades are provided in Table 1. The species sequenced in this study are indicated in bold

Discussion

The results of this study shed new light on the diversity of trematodes of the genus Crepidostomum in Europe. The existing genetic data was based on analysis of partial sequences of the 28S rRNA gene of Crepidostomum species that use salmonid fishes as final hosts [18]. Crepidostomum oschmarini was found from two sympatric but phylogenetically distant fish host species, B. barbatula (Cypriniformes) and C. gobio (Scorpaeniformes). Although host switching is probably easier among related host species [45], host switches between unrelated hosts can also take place [4648]. While B. barbatula and C. gobio are phylogenetically distant, their feeding habitats and food preferences are similar. Predominant preys are small benthic arthropods (insect larvae, i.e. ephemeropterans, plecopterans, trichopterans and crustaceans [49, 50]). It is likely that a feeding overlap produced by food items that are involved in the life-cycle of the parasite, resulted in the infection of both fish with the same Crepidostomum species.

Comparative sequence analysis in this study confirmed the link between the redial and cercarial isolates ex P. casertanum from the River Nedzingė, Lithuania, and the adult stages of C. oschmarini parasitizing B. barbatula and C. gobio from the River Il’d, Russia. No intraspecific variation was detected between these isolates, despite the considerable geographical distance (~ 1000 km) between the Lithuanian and Russian populations.

The level of differences found between the partial 28S rDNA sequences of C. oschmarini and C. metoecus (0.6–0.7%) clearly demonstrates that these two forms are different species. The observed level of differences is similar to the levels of interspecific variability reported for allocreadiid digeneans [4, 18, 30, 44]. It is notable that occasionally relatively low interspecific genetic divergence can be discovered in related allocreadiid species; for instance, only 0.29% divergence was found between Auriculostoma lobata Hernández-Mena, Lynggaard, Mendoza-Garfias & Pérez-Ponce de León, 2016 and its sister species A. astyanace Scholz, Aguirre-Macedo & Choudhury, 2004 (Allocreadiidae) [51]. Despite the conservative nature of the 28S rDNA gene region, it segregates well-supported subclades of C. metoecus, Crepidostomum sp. 2 and C. oschmarini, within a single clade (Fig. 4).

Recently, the existence of cryptic species was uncovered among Crepidostomum spp. infecting salmonid fishes and different first and second intermediate hosts in the sub-Arctic Lake Takvatn [18]. Hence, molecular results evidenced that species diversity in Crepidostomum is underestimated. Molecular data obtained from analysis of 28S rDNA partial sequences disclosed two pairs of genetically closely related species, i.e. C. farionis - Crepidostomum sp. 1, and C. metoecus-Crepidostomum sp. 2. Considering that there are only five nominal European Crepidostomum species included into the Fauna Europaea database [52], i.e. C. auriculatum Wedl, 1858, C. farionis, C. latum, C. metoecus and C. wikgreni Gibson & Valtonen, 1988, the finding was surprising and shows that diversity in this genus and in this otherwise depauperate freshwater ecosystem is higher than was presumed. Crepidostomum farionis and C. metoecus were known as the only two species of this genus parasitizing salmonids in Europe [5, 34]. Crepidostomum wikgreni described from the gall-bladder and intestine of the whitefish Coregonus acronicus (Salmonidae) in Lake Yli-Kitka, northeast Finland, has never been recorded elsewhere and is regarded as an endemic form [42]. No sequence data are available for this species and it could not be included in molecular phylogenies. The gross morphology of C. wikgreni appeared very similar to C. farionis and it was suggested that C. wikgreni has probably evolved from C. farionis after deglaciation and since c.8400 BP when the waters of the Kitka Lake system were isolated [42]. These two species presumably represent closely related sister taxa.

Crepidostomum nemachilus was originally described from Nemachilus barbatulus toni (Nemacheilidae) on Sakhalin Island in the Russian Far East [53]. The genetic identity of C. nemachilus and C. metoecus was revealed in comparative analysis of 28S sequences, but distinctions observed in morphology of the two species were regarded as an argument to refrain from deciding upon synonymy of the two taxa [30]. However, recent morphological reexamination of C. nemachilus from the type-host Barbatula toni (Dybowski) (syn. Nemachilus toni) showed that it is consistent with the specimens of C. metoecus including those found in B. toni in every essential feature [8]. Thus, both molecular and morphological findings demonstrated that C. nemachilus is a synonym of C. metoecus.

Acrolichanus auriculatum (syn. Crepidostomum auriculatum), a parasite of sturgeons, comprise a separate branch in the molecular 28S rDNA phylogenetic tree, distantly related to other Crepidostomum spp. [18, 30]. Wedl [54] described this species as Distoma auriculatum. Since then, it has undergone many taxonomic revisions (see [1, 55]). Skwortzoff [56] conducted a comprehensive morphological analysis of the species based on a large amount of material collected from Acipenser ruthenus from the Volga River and Oka River, concluding that they should be assigned to the genus Acrolichanus Ward, 1917. Thus, there have been opposing opinions on the validity of Acrolichanus. Some authors, along with Hopkins [57], are of the opinion that this taxon is insufficiently distinct from Crepidostomum and must be placed within the latter genus. However, molecular data support the opinion of Skryabin & Koval [55] and Bykhovskaya-Pavlovskaya & Kulakova [5] that A. auriculatum is distinct enough from samples of the other Palaearctic and Nearctic Crepidostomum spp. to be assigned to another genus. In 28S rDNA based phylogenies A. auriculatum appears to be much closer to Bunodera spp. than to Crepidostomum spp.

Crepidostomum latum is a little-known species described by Pigulewsky [41] based on only two specimens from the intestine of the rudd, Scardinius erythrophthalmus (L.) (Cyprinidae), in the River Sozh (in the upper course of the River Dnepr, Ukraine). The species has not been encountered since and its validity is questionable [5].

The 28S rDNA based phylogenetic tree generated here agrees in general topology with recently published estimates of phylogeny for the Allocreadiidae [18, 58]. In these studies, the species of the genera Allocreadium and Bunodera formed two monophyletic clades. The different situation concerns the genus Crepidostomum. In the present analyses C. oschmarini, C. metoecus (syn. C. nemachilus Krotov, 1959) and Crepidostomum sp. 2 represented closely related sister taxa in the 28S rDNA-based phylogeny. We refer to this clade as the C. metoecus complex. The second clade, including European Crepidostomum isolates was comprised of C. farionis and Crepidostomum sp. 1. Our sequences for isolates sampled from Sphaerium nitidum, Pisidium sp., P. casertanum and S. trutta from Norway matched the sequences of Crepidostomum sp. 1 of Soldánová et al. [18]. However, a monophyletic origin of the two Crepidostomum clades is not supported in the 28S rDNA-based phylogeny. DNA sequences, unconstrained by function, as the internal transcribed spacer 2 (ITS2), usually experience higher rates of genetic change than encoding regions, as the 28S. In the ITS2-based phylogeny, the Crepidostomum sp. 1 clade was distant from all other allocreadiid clades, but the C. metoecus complex and Nearctic Crepidostomum clade formed well-supported higher-level clade (Fig. 5). It is interesting that the Nearctic Crepidostomum clade combines some species of the other allocreadiid genera, i.e. Auriculostoma and Creptotrematina in the ITS2 tree, and even more genera comprise this clade in the 28S tree. The results of the phylogenetic analyses led us to a presumption that at least two groups of Crepidostomum species are paraphyletic. There are more cases known when molecular analysis using the 28S rDNA gene revealed paraphyly in a group of allocreadiid trematodes, conventionally regarded as a monophyletic assemblage. Hence, recently the genus Paracreptotrema Choudhury, Pérez-Ponce de León, Brooks & Daverdin, 2006 was shown to be a paraphyletic and two new genera were erected to accommodate the taxonomy with the results of molecular phylogeny [58].

The sequences of isolates of the intramolluscan stages from P. casertanum collected in the River Burulcha, Crimea, formed a robustly supported subclade with metacercarial and adult isolates of Crepidostomum sp. 2 sensu Soldánová et al. (2017) [18] from a sub-Arctic lake in Norway. This finding did not match our expectations, as the upper stream of the River Burulcha, Crimea, is the type-locality for the cercarial material used by Stenko [16] for experimental life-cycle studies on C. metoecus. Notably, the second intermediate hosts recorded in the study of Stenko [16] were nymphs of the mayfly (Ephemeroptera) and stonefly (Plecoptera). Nymphs of these insects were found infected with metacercariae of Crepidostomum sp. 2 in the molecular study of Soldánová et al. [18]. On the other hand, amphipods Gammarus lacustris were found to be the second intermediate host of C. metoecus in Lake Takvatn in Norway [18]. Based on these facts, we can assume that Stenko [16] was dealing with Crepidostomum sp. 2. Adult specimens of Crepidostomum sp. 2 were recorded in brown trout, S. trutta, in the molecular study of Soldánová et al. [18], and Stenko [16] noted that S. trutta fario was naturally infected with “C. metoecus” in the River Burulcha. Speciation patterns of parasites may be directly associated with their hosts, though in the case of parasites with complex life-cycles it is often less clear which host may have the most influence on parasite speciation. The life-cycle peculiarities of two closely related species, C. metoecus and Crepidostomum sp. 2, would suggest that the speciation was driven by factors associated with the second intermediate hosts, phylogenetically distant arthropods, while the first intermediate and definitive hosts are shared between these two trematode species. However, a more accurate knowledge of life-cycles is necessary to explain the pattern of cryptic diversity observed in Crepidostomum spp.

The molecular segregation of C. oschmarini and C. metoecus prompted us to compare these worms using SEM and to try to identify diagnostic morphological features for the species. The present SEM study of the surface morphology of C. oschmarini revealed both common and specific patterns in the number and arrangement of tegumental papillae as compared with other similarly studied species of Crepidostomum [1, 7, 12, 13].

The five large papillae detected on the posterior rim of the oral sucker of C. oschmarini are common to all of the Crepidostomum species examined to date and can be seen in SEM photos of C. metoecus, C. farionis, C. illinoiense Faust, 1918, C. ictaluri (Surber, 1928) and C. cooperi Hopkins, 1931, published by Caira [1], as well as in C. farionis and C. metoecus examined by Moravec [7] and Žd'árská & Nebesářová [13] and also in C. opeongoensis Caira, 1985 studied by Choudhury & Nelson [12]. Five characteristic larger papillae are also visible on the posterior rim of the oral sucker in other allocreadiid species, e.g. Bunodera sacculata Van Cleave & Mueller, 1932 and B. mediovitellata Tsimbaliuk & Roitman, 1966 studied by Caira [1].

The presence of six dome-shaped papillae on the rim of the ventral sucker revealed in C. oschmarini has also been observed in C. metoecus by Moravec [7] and in C. opeongoensis by Choudhury & Nelson [12]. However, no papillae were observed on the ventral sucker in C. farionis [7].

A consistent pattern in the sensory papillae arrangement was found to occur in the anterior body region and ventral forebody surface of all specimens of C. oschmarini. First, there are three paired, symmetrically distributed, differently-sized papillae situated in the centre of the anterior rim of the oral sucker. Such a pattern has not been reported for any of the other Crepidostomum species studied to date by SEM [1, 7, 12, 13]. In С. metoecus, a species most closely related to C. oschmarini, only two pairs of symmetrically arranged papillae are visible in the illustrations of Moravec [7] and Žd'árská & Nebesářová [13].

Secondly, a local concentration of eight papillae located ventro-laterally underneath the rim of the oral sucker is characteristic for C. oschmarini. It is worth noting, however, that the presence of a similar but smaller group of papillae can be seen in published SEM photos of some previously studied species, i.e. three papillae in C. metoecus and five papillae in C. cooperi [1].

Thirdly, a single large papilla is associated with each ventro-lateral lobe in C. oschmarini. In contrast, the presence of two papillae on the surface of each ventro-lateral lobe is apparent in the SEM photos of C. metoecus presented by Moravec [7].

Fourthly, the arrangement of ciliated and non-ciliated sensory endings in two longitudinal symmetrical rows on the ventro-median surface of the forebody was revealed in C. oschmarini. Judging from the available SEM data on the papillae distribution in Crepidostomum spp., two fields of “tegumental bosses” (non-ciliated sensory endings) are situated laterally along the forebody in C. metoecus [7] and, there are four pairs of papillae on the ventral forebody in C. opeongoensis [12].

The present SEM study clearly demonstrates the distinction between two sister taxa, C. oschmarini and C. metoecus, which have been shown, using our molecular data, to be closely related. This and previous SEM studies on the surface topography of species of Crepidostomum suggest that the arrangement of the sensory endings of adult specimens exhibit interspecific differences which represent useful additional taxonomic criteria for understanding this genus.

Conclusions

According to available data, we suggest that two complexes of Crepidostomum species parasitize freshwater fishes in Europe. The Crepidostomum metoecus complex consists of C. metoecus (syn. C. nemachilus), C. oschmarini and Crepidostomum sp. 2, while the C. farionis complex includes C. farionis, Crepidostomum sp. 1 and, probably, C. wikgreni. Morphological and molecular evidence together indicated the validity of C. oshmarini and provided clear criteria for its separation from C. metoecus and other congeneric species. The phylogenetic study supported that some Crepidostomum species are euryxenous, so host switching in this genus may occur independently of fish-host phylogeny. Our phylogenetic analyses confirm the prediction that there are large numbers of cryptic parasite species to be discovered [59] and reinforce the idea that trematodes are a much more diverse group than as is judged from morphological data and once again confirm the observation that studies based on comparison of nuclear DNA markers are more likely to uncover cryptic species among trematodes than other groups of helminths [60]. This study demonstrates the value of steadily adding relevant parasitological and sequence data to a growing database for allocreadiids as well as for any other group of trematodes. No matter which life-cycle stage has been obtained or from what hosts and geographical localities, from such specimens we will gain the framework needed to connect and clarify life-cycles and gain a more complete understanding of the existing diversity, host specificity and ecology of trematodes under consideration.

Abbreviations

GTR + G + I: 

Gamma distribution of rates and a proportion of invariant sites

ITS2: 

Internal transcribed spacer 2

ML: 

Maximum likelihood

SEM: 

Scanning electron microscopy

SPR: 

Subtree pruning and regrafting

Declarations

Acknowledgments

Part of this research was performed in the framework of programme (no. АААА-А18-118012690100-5) of I. D. Papanin Institute for Biology of Inland Waters, RAS, to L. Poddubnaya and A. Zhokhov. The authors are grateful to the staff of the Centre of Electron Microscopy, I. D. Papanin Institute for the Biology of Inland Waters, for technical assistance. We would like to thank to Dr Eleonora Korol (National Museum of Natural History, NAS of Ukraine) for helping in the collection of clams in the Burulcha River. We are also thankful to postgraduate students of Vilnius University (supervisor V. Stunžėnas): Jelena Beliajeva for her contribution in the creation of the new primers, AlJe-F and AlJe-R; and Aurelija Miliūtė for her contribution in the molecular analysis of some samples.

Funding

This research was funded by a grant (no. MIP-43/2015) from the Research Council of Lithuania.

Availability of data and materials

Nucleotide sequences obtained in the present study have been deposited into the GenBank database under the accession numbers MH143101-MH143119, MH159989-MH159994 (28S) and MH143075-MH143100 (ITS2).

Authors’ contributions

RP designed the study. RP, VS and GS performed the field and laboratory research and analyzed data. AEZ conducted field collections and carried out morphological research. LGP performed micromorphological research. VS and GS extracted DNR for PGR and sequencing. Molecular analyses were carried out by VS. All authors actively contributed to the interpretation of the findings and development of the final manuscript. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Ethics approval and consent to participate

Not applicable.

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.

Authors’ Affiliations

(1)
Institute of Ecology of Nature Research Centre, Akademijos str. 2, LT-08412 Vilnius, Lithuania
(2)
Papanin Institute for Biology of Inland Waters, Russian Academy of Sciences, Borok, Russia

References

  1. Caira JN. A revision of the North American papillose Allocreadiidae (Digenea) with independent cladistics analyses of larval and adult forms. Bull Univ Nebr State Mus. 1989;11:1–58.Google Scholar
  2. Caira JN, Bogea T. Family Allocreadiidae Looss, 1902. In: Jones A, Gibson DI, Bray RA, editors. Keys to the Trematoda, Volume 2. Wallingford: CABI Publishing and the Natural History Museum; 2005. p. 417–36.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  3. Gibson DI. Trematoda. In: Margolis L, Kabata Z, editors. Guide to the Parasites of Fishes of Canada, part IV. Canadian Special Publication of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences, Vol. 124. Ottawa: NRC Research Press; 1996.Google Scholar
  4. Tkach VV, Curran SS, Bell JA, Overstreet RM. A new species of Crepidostomum (Digenea: Allocreadiidae) from Hiodon tergisus in Mississippi and molecular comparison with three congeners. J Parasitol. 2013;99:1114–21.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  5. Bykhovskaya-Pavlovskaya IE, Kulakova AP. Trematoda. In: Bauer ON, editor. Key to Parasites of Freshwater Fishes of USSR, Volume 3. Leningrad: Nauka; 1987. p. 77–198 (In Russian).Google Scholar
  6. Rauckis E. Fish Parasites in Lithuanian Waters. Vilnius: Mokslas; 1988 (In Russian).Google Scholar
  7. Moravec F. External morphological differences between Crepidostomum farionis and Crepidostomum metoecus (Trematoda: Allocreadiidae), parasites of salmonids, as revealed by SEM. Folia Parasitol. 2002;49:211–317.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  8. Shimazu T. Digeneans parasitic in freshwater fishes (Osteichthyes) of Japan VIII. Allocreadiidae, Crepidostomum. Bull Natl Mus Nat Sci Ser A. 2016;42:107–22.Google Scholar
  9. Niewiadomska K. Fish Parasites in Poland (Keys for identification). Digenea. Warszawa: Polskie Towarzystwo Parazytologiczne; 2003 (In Polish).Google Scholar
  10. Zhokhov AE, Pugacheva MN. Crepidostomum oschmarini sp. n. (Trematoda, Bunoderidae) of Nemacheilus barbatulus (Cobitidae) from the upper Volga River basin. Zool Zh. 1998;77:1329–31 (In Russian).Google Scholar
  11. Sokolov SG. Fish parasites of the Upper Volga basin (taxonomic and ecological diversity and zoogeography). Extended abstract of Cand Sci (Biol) dissertation. Moscow: INPA RAN; 2000.Google Scholar
  12. Choudhury A, Nelson PA. Redescription of Crepidostomum opeongoensis Caira, 1985 (Trematoda, Allocreadiidae) from fish hosts Hiodon alosoides and Hiodon tergisus (Osteichthyes: Hiodontidae). J Parasitol. 2000;86:1305–12.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  13. Žd'árská Z, Nebesářová J. Transmission electron microsopy of presumed sensory receptors of the forebody papillae of Crepidostomum metoecus (Digenea: Allocreadiidae). Folia Parasitol. 2004;51:27–32.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  14. Cannon LRG. The life cycles of Bunodera sacculata and B. luciopercae (Trematoda: Allocreadiidae) in Algonquin Park, Ontario. Can J Zool. 1971;49:1417–29.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  15. Brown FJ. On Crepidostomum farionis O.F. Müll. (= Stephanophiala laureata Zeder), a distome parasite of the trout and grayling. I. The life history. Parasitology. 1927;19:86–99.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  16. Stenko RP. On the life cycle of Crepidostomum metoecus (Trematoda: Bunoderidae). In: Polyansky JI, editor. Parasites and Parasitosis of Man and Animals. Kiev: Naukova Dumka; 1982. p. 198–204 (In Russian).Google Scholar
  17. Awachie JBE. On the bionomics of Crepidostomum metoecus (Braun, 1900) and Crepidostomum farionis (Müller, 1784) (Trematoda: Allocreadiidae). Parasitology. 1968;55:307–24.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  18. Soldánová M, Georgieva S, Roháčová J, Knudsen R, Kuhn JA, Henriksen EH, et al. Molecular analyses reveal high species diversity of trematodes in a sub-Arctic lake. Int J Parasitol. 2017;47:327–45.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  19. Stunžėnas V, Petkevičiūtė R, Stanevičiūtė G. Phylogeny of Sphaerium solidum (Bivalvia) based on karyotype and sequences of 16S and ITS1 rDNA. Cent Eur J Biol. 2011;6:105–17.Google Scholar
  20. Petkevičiūtė R, Stunžėnas V, Stanevičiūtė G. Differentiation of European freshwater bucephalids (Digenea: Bucephalidae) based on karyotypes and DNA sequences. Syst Parasitol. 2014;87:199–212.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  21. Bowles J, Blair D, McManus DP. A molecular phylogeny of the human schistosomes. Mol Phylogenet Evol. 1995;4:103–9.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  22. Cribb TH, Anderson GR, Adlard RD, Bray RA. A DNA-based demonstration of a three-host life-cycle for the Bivesiculidae (Platyhelminthes: Digenea). Int J Parasitol. 1998;28:1791–5.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  23. Scholz T, De Chambrier A, Kuchta R, Littlewood DTJ, Waeschenbach A. Macrobothriotaenia ficta (Cestoda: Proteocephalidea), a parasite of sunbeam snake (Xenopeltis unicolor): example of convergent evolution. Zootaxa. 2013;3640:485–99.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  24. Tkach V, Grabda-Kazubska B, Pawlowski J, Swiderski Z. Molecular and morphological evidences for close phylogenetic affinities of the genera Macrodera, Leptophallus, Metaleptophallus, and Paralepoderma (Digenea, Plagiorchioidea). Acta Parasitol. 1999;44:170–9.Google Scholar
  25. Olson PD, Cribb TH, Tkach VV, Bray RA, Littlewood DTJ. Phylogeny and classification of the Digenea (Platyhelminthes: Trematoda). Int J Parasitol. 2003;33:733–55.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  26. Tkach VV, Littlewood DTJ, Olson PD, Kinsella MJ, Swiderski Z. Molecular phylogenetic analysis of the Microphalloidea Morozov, 1955 (Trematoda: Digenea): a bigger data set resolves fewer genera. Syst Parasitol. 2003;56:1–15.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  27. Katoh K, Standley DM. MAFFT Multiple Sequence Alignment Software Version 7: Improvements in performance and usability. Mol Biol Evol. 2013;30:772–80.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  28. Posada D. jModelTest: phylogenetic modelling averaging. Mol Biol Evol. 2008;25:1253–6.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  29. Tamura K, Peterson D, Peterson N, Stecher G, Nei M, Kumar S. MEGA5: Molecular Evolutionary Genetics Analysis using maximum likelihood, evolutionary distance, and maximum parsimony methods. Mol Biol Evol. 2011;24:2731–9.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  30. Atopkin DM, Shedko MB. Genetic characterization of far eastern species of the genus Crepidostomum (Trematoda: Allocreadiidae) by means of 28S ribosomal DNA sequences. Adv Biosci Biotechnol. 2014;5:209–15.Google Scholar
  31. Nybelin O. Crepidostomum suecicum n. sp. - ein Trematode mit ungewöhnlich morphologischer variationsbreite. Ark Zool. 1932;25:1–6.Google Scholar
  32. Braun M. Einige bemerkungen über die Fascioliden der Chiroptera. Zool Anz. 1900;23:387–91.Google Scholar
  33. Dinulescu G. Bemerkungen über das helminthen-schmarotzertum bei den Salmoniden aus den bergflüssen Rumäniens. Neue arten von Trematoden und Nematoden. An Ins Cercet Pisc României. 1942;1:7–25.Google Scholar
  34. Ślusarski W. The adult Digenea from Salmonidae of the basin of the Vistula and of the South Baltic. Acta Parasitol Pol. 1958;6:247–58 (In Polish).Google Scholar
  35. Thomas JD. Studies on Crepidostomum metoecus (Braun) and C. farionis (Muller), parasitic in Salmo trutta L. and S. salar L. in Britain. Parasitology. 1958;48:336–52.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  36. Linton E. Trematodes from fishes mainly from the Woods Hole region, Massachusetts. Proc US Nat Mus. 1940;88:1–72.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  37. Nikol W. Studies on the structure and classification of the digenetic trematodes. Quart J Microscop Sci. 1909;53:391–487.Google Scholar
  38. Faust EC. Studies on American Stephanophialinae. Trans Amer Microscop Soc. 1918;37:183–98.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  39. Layman EM. Parasitic worms of fish of Baikal Lake. Proc Baikal Limnol Station. 1933;4:5–98 (In Russian).Google Scholar
  40. Markewich OP. Parasitofauna of Freshwater Fishes of Ukraine. Kiev: Izdatel’stvo Akademii Nauk SSSR; 1951 (In Russian).Google Scholar
  41. Pigulewsky SW. Neue arten von Trematoden aus fischen des Dnjeprbassins. Zool Anz. 1931;96:9–18.Google Scholar
  42. Gibson DI, Valtonen ET. A new species of Crepidostomum (Allocreadiidae: Digenea) from north-eastern Finland, with comments on its possible origin. Syst Parasitol. 1988;12:31–40.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  43. Bray RA, Foster GN, Waeschenbach A, Littlewood DTJ. The discovery of progenetic Allocreadium neotenicum Peters, 1957 (Digenea: Allocreadiidae) in water beetles (Coleoptera: Dytiscidae) in Great Britain. Zootaxa. 2012;3577:58–70.Google Scholar
  44. Petkevičiūtė R, Stunžėnas V, Stanevičiūtė G, Sokolov SG. Comparison of the developmental stages of some European allocreadiid trematode species and a clarification of their life-cycles based on ITS2 and 28S sequences. Syst Parasitol. 2010;76:169–78.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  45. Poulin R. Evolutionary Ecology of Parasites. 2nd ed. Princeton: Princeton University Press; 2007.Google Scholar
  46. Stunžėnas V, Petkevičiūtė R, Poddubnaya LG, Stanevičiūtė G, Zhokhov AE. Host specificity, molecular phylogeny and morphological differences of Phyllodistomum pseudofolium Nybelin, 1926 and Phyllodistomum angulatum Linstow, 1907 (Trematoda: Gorgoderidae) with notes on Eurasian ruffe as final host for Phyllodistomum spp. Parasit Vectors. 2017;10:286.Google Scholar
  47. Brabec J, Waeschenbach A, Scholz T, Littlewood DTJ, Kuchta R. Molecular phylogeny of the Bothriocephalidea (Cestoda): molecular data challenge morphological classification. Int J Parasitol. 2015;45:761–71.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  48. Binkienė R, Miliūtė A, Stunžėnas V. Molecular data confirm the taxonomic position of Hymenolepis erinacei (Cyclophyllidea: Hymenolepididae) and host switching, with notes on cestodes of Palaearctic hedgehogs (Erinaceidae). J Helminthol. 2018; https://doi.org/10.1017/S0022149X18000056.
  49. Virbickas J. Fishes of Lithuania. Vilnius: Mokslas; 1986 (In Lithuanian).Google Scholar
  50. Tomlinson ML, Perrow MR. Ecology of the Bullhead. Conserving Natura 2000 Rivers Ecology Series No. 4. Peterborough: English Nature; 2003.Google Scholar
  51. Hernández-Mena DI, Lynggaard C, Mendoza-Garfias B, Pérez-Ponce de León G. A new species of Auriculostoma (Trematoda: Allocreadiidae) from the intestine of Brycon guatemalensis (Characiformes: Bryconidae) from the Usumacinta River basin, Mexico, based on morphology and 28S rDNA sequences, with a key to species of the genus. Zootaxa. 2016;4196:261–77.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  52. Gibson DI. Fauna Europaea: Allocreadiidae, Crepidostomum. Fauna Europaea version. 2018;03. https://fauna-eu.org/cdm_dataportal/taxon/d6f4dc06-5291-4df3-978d-3fad9f0d1dfd. Accessed 3 Mar 2018.
  53. Krotov AI. Two new species of helminth parasites in vertebrates of Sakhalin Island (Crepidostomum nemachilus sp. n., Heligmosomum petrovi sp. n.). Acta Vet Hungarica. 1959;9:7–12.Google Scholar
  54. Wedl C. Anatomische beobachtungen über Trematoden. Sitzungsber. Akad Wiss Math-Naturwiss. 1858;26:241–78.Google Scholar
  55. Skryabin KI, Koval VP. The superfamily Allocreadioidea Nicoll, 1934. In: Skryabin KI, editor. Trematodes of animals and man and the diseases caused by them, Vol. XXII. Moscow: Nauka; 1966. p. 175–517 (In Russian).Google Scholar
  56. Skwortzoff AA. To the anatomy of the trematode Acrolichanus auriculatus (Wedl, 1856) in the sterlet of Volga River basin. Proc Helminthol. 1927;1:276–86.Google Scholar
  57. Hopkins SH. The morphology, life histories and relationships of the papillose Allocreadiidae (Trematoda). Preliminary Report. Zool Anz. 1933;103:65–74.Google Scholar
  58. Pérez-Ponce de León G, Pinacho-Pinacho CD, Mendoza-Garfias B, Choudhury A, García-Varela M. Phylogenetic analysis using the 28S rRNA gene reveals that the genus Paracreptotrema (Digenea: Allocreadiidae) is not monophyletic; description of two new genera and one new species. J Parasitol. 2016;102:131–42.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  59. Pérez-Ponce de León G, Nadler SA. What we don’t recognize can hurt us: a plea for awareness about cryptic species. J Parasitol. 2010;96:453–64.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  60. Pérez-Ponce de León G, Poulin R. An updated look at the uneven distribution of cryptic diversity among parasitic helminths. J Helminthol. 2017;92:197–202.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  61. Shimazu T. Digeneans parasitic in freshwater fishes (Osteichthyes) of Japan. XII. A list of the papers of the series, a key to the families in Japan, a parasite-host list, a host-parasite list, Addenda, and Errata. Bull Natl Mus Nat Sci Ser A. 2017;43:129–43.Google Scholar
  62. Curran SS, Tkach VV, Overstreet RM. A review of Polylekithum Arnold, 1934 and its familial affinities using morphological and molecular data, with description of Polylekithum catahoulensis sp. nov. Acta Parasitol. 2006;51:238–48.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  63. Razo-Mendivil U, Mendoza-Garfias B, Pérez-Ponce de León G, Rubio-Godoy M. A new species of Auriculostoma (Digenea: Allocreadiidae) in the Mexican Tetra Astyanax mexicanus (Actinopterygii: Characidae) from Central Veracruz, Mexico, described with the use of morphological and molecular data. J Parasitol. 2014;100:331–7.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  64. Curran SS, Tkach VV, Overstreet RM. Phylogenetic affinities of Auriculostoma (Digenea: Allocreadiidae), with descriptions of two new species from Peru. J. Parasitol. 2011;97:661–70.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  65. Petkevičiūtė R, Stunžėnas V, Stanevičiūtė G. Clarification of the systematic position of Cercariaeum crassum Wesenberg-Lund, 1934 (Digenea), based on karyological analysis and DNA sequences. J Helminthol. 2012;86:293–301.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  66. Curran SS, Pulis EE, Hugg DO, Brown JP, Manuel LC, Overstreet RM. Phylogenetic position of Creptotrema funduli in the Allocreadiidae based on partial 28S rDNA sequences. J. Parasitol. 2012;98:873–5.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  67. Stunžėnas V, Cryan JR, Molloy DP. Comparison of rDNA sequences from colchicine treated and untreated tissues. Parasitol Int. 2004;53:223–8.View ArticleGoogle Scholar

Copyright

© The Author(s). 2018

Comments

By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate. Please note that comments may be removed without notice if they are flagged by another user or do not comply with our community guidelines.

Advertisement