Skip to content


  • Research
  • Open Access

Fasciola hepatica-Pseudosuccinea columella interaction: effect of increasing parasite doses, successive exposures and geographical origin on the infection outcome of susceptible and naturally-resistant snails from Cuba

Parasites & Vectors201811:559

  • Received: 19 June 2018
  • Accepted: 17 October 2018
  • Published:



Pseudosuccinea columella is one of the most widespread vectors of Fasciola hepatica, a globally distributed trematode that affects humans, livestock and wildlife. The exclusive occurrence in Cuba of susceptible and naturally-resistant populations to F. hepatica within this snail species, offers a fascinating model for evolutionary biology, health sciences and vector control strategies. In particular, resistance in P. columella is characterized by the encapsulation of the parasite by host’s immune cells and has been experimentally tested using different Cuban F. hepatica isolates with no records of successful infection. Here, we aimed to explore for the first time, the effect of different parasite doses, successive exposures and different parasite origins on the infection outcomes of the two phenotypes of P. columella occurring in Cuba.


To increase the chances for F. hepatica to establish, we challenged Cuban P. columella with increasing single parasite doses of 5, 15 or 30 miracidia and serial exposures (three-times) of 5 miracidia using a sympatric F. hepatica isolate from Cuba, previously characterized by microsatellite markers. Additionally, we exposed the snails to F. hepatica from different geographical origins (i.e. Dominican Republic and France). Parasite prevalence, redial burden and survival of snails were recorded at 25 days post-exposure.


No parasite development was noted in snails from the resistant populations independent of the experimental approach. Contrastingly, an overall increase in prevalence and redial burden was observed in susceptible snails when infected with high miracidia doses and after serial exposures. Significant differences in redial burden between single 15 miracidia and serial 3 × 5 miracidia infected snails suggest that immune priming potentially occurs in susceptible P. columella. Compatibility differences of allopatric (Caribbean vs European) F. hepatica with susceptible snails were related to the geographical scale of the combinations.


Here, the effectiveness of P. columella resistance to F. hepatica does not decline with increasing parasite doses, successive infection or different geographical origins of parasite isolates, while presenting new evidence for specificity for infection in susceptible P. columella snails. Understanding the peculiarities of the P. columella-F. hepatica interaction and the extent of the resistant phenotype is crucial for an effective parasite control and for developing alternatives to tackle fasciolosis transmission.


  • Snail-trematode interaction
  • Lymnaeidae
  • Liver fluke
  • Experimental infection
  • Immune priming
  • Compatibility
  • Allopatric parasites


The liver fluke Fasciola hepatica Linnaeus, 1758 is the main causative agent of fasciolosis, a snail-borne parasitic disease that affects humans, livestock and wildlife [1]. The occurrence of this trematode in all continents except in Antarctica has been largely explained by the introduction of infected livestock and susceptible snails into new areas, with F. hepatica being able to parasitize a wide range of host species [1, 2]. The arrival of the liver fluke to the Americas presumably occurred during the early events of colonization of the New World by Europeans, with several native freshwater lymnaeid snails transmitting the parasite today [1].

Pseudosuccinea columella (Say, 1817), considered native from North America [3], can be also cited among the intermediate host species of F. hepatica in South America and the Caribbean [46]. In addition, it is a globally invasive freshwater snail that has been largely introduced out of its native range [3] with reports of established populations from Europe [7], Africa [8], Australia [9] and the Pacific islands [10, 11]. The global spread of some invasive genotypes of P. columella might complicate the epidemiological scenario of fasciolosis transmission [3].

Interestingly, in Cuba, P. columella displays two different phenotypes regarding F. hepatica infection with natural populations being either susceptible [5] or resistant to the liver fluke [12]. Notably, the resistant phenotype in field-occurring P. columella is characterized by the encapsulation of the parasite by the host’s immune cells [12]. These populations have been extensively tested for infection using different Cuban isolates of F. hepatica but no successful parasite development has ever been recorded (see [1214] for details). From a genetic perspective, studies exploring the existence of polymorphism in P. columella have shown that resistant snails cluster separately from susceptible populations in Cuba [13] and other regions of the world [3].

The challenging of resistant individuals of P. columella has been always carried out using a constant standard dose of five miracidia (infective larva for the snails). Therefore, we wanted to explore the effect of higher infective doses of the parasite, either by single or serial exposure trials on both susceptible and resistant P. columella using a known polymorphic F. hepatica isolate from Cuba (La Palma; [15]). With these approaches we aimed at tipping the scales in favour of the infection success by (i) increasing the probability of encounter of compatible host-parasite genotypes, and (ii) by circumventing or hijacking the effectiveness of host immune defences with large miracidia numbers and/or enhanced genetic diversity of the parasite at which each snail is confronted [16, 17].

In another experiment, given that resistant individuals had always been challenged with Cuban isolates of F. hepatica, we exposed for the first time, susceptible and resistant P. columella from Cuba to two allopatric liver fluke isolates from the Caribbean (short distance) and Europe (large distance), and compared their infection outcomes with those of the sympatric Cuban isolate. The theory of local adaptation predicts that parasites perform better on their local (sympatric) hosts rather than foreign (allopatric) hosts [18]. However, exceptions exist (e.g. [14, 19]), thus a differential exposure of a host population to an “unknown” entity (i.e. allopatric parasites) might result in differential outcomes and can test for different patterns of susceptibility or even resistance. Given the geographical isolation between the parasite isolates used, genetic differences are expected and should account for variations in compatibility with the snail host, particularly between the Cuban and the European isolates. With this experimental approach, it is likely that a higher infection success from exposing susceptible P. columella to sympatric F. hepatica would be observed, while the resulting outcome with resistant populations could give clues concerning the specificity of their resistance. If no infection occurs in resistant P. columella then we might hypothesize that this phenotypic response is not restricted only to local (Cuban) parasites but it has a broader or even global scale.

Here, we gain new insights on the susceptible P. columella-F. hepatica interaction, presenting evidence related to differences in compatibility and immune priming as factors affecting the infection outcomes (e.g. prevalence, redial burden, host survival) in this model. Moreover, we demonstrate that resistant populations described from Cuba remain resistant to a high F. hepatica miracidial dose, after serial exposures or challenged with allopatric F. hepatica isolates. This highly resistant phenotype opened new perspectives of applications for fasciolosis control.


Fasciola hepatica isolates and laboratory-reared susceptible and resistant P. columella

We collected adults of F. hepatica in local abattoirs from eastern Cuba (sympatric isolate: La Palma, Pinar del Río Province), north-western Dominican Republic (allopatric isolate, narrow scale: Dajabón Province) and southern France (allopatric isolate, large scale: Camargue region). The genetic structure of eight F. hepatica isolates from Cuba (including parasites from La Palma and other regions within its vicinity) had been previously characterized [15]; this study demonstrated the existence of high polymorphism and genetic diversity within Cuban F. hepatica with no clear genetic differentiation among isolates due to a high genetic flow within the island and a preferential out-crossing as reproduction strategy. In particular, the La Palma isolate (local isolate used in the present study) showed over 75% prevalence in sacrificed bovines and a mean of five alleles per analysed microsatellite locus with an observed heterozygosity of 0.511 [15]. Unfortunately, no previous data on genetic diversity is available for the Dominican and French isolates used, but we can expect differences with Cuban flukes given the geographical isolation.

Flukes were collected from the liver of infected cattle and kept alive for 6 h in a solution of 0.85% NaCl (saline solution) and 5% glucose (Sigma-Aldrich, St. Quentin Fallavier, France) for egg laying. Eggs were preserved at 4 °C in the dark and in saline solution supplemented with gentamicin (Sigma-Aldrich, 40 mg/ml) until use.

We used two susceptible P. columella populations, Negrines (Havana Province) and Aurora (Mayabeque Province), and two resistant populations, La Coca (Havana Province) and La Palma (Pinar del Río Province). Snails were reared in the Laboratory of Malacology of the Institute of Tropical Medicine “Pedro Kourí”, Cuba, for two to three generations and derived from field-collected populations of P. columella. Snails were cultured in Petri dishes with growing algae, in 26 °C de-chlorinated water complemented with crushed shells as a carbonate supplement as previously described [20]. The snails were fed on the algae ad libitum and routinely changed to other Petri dishes with growing algae to avoid starvation.

Experimental exposure of P. columella snails to F. hepatica

Experimental exposure of 2-weeks-old laboratory-reared P. columella from the four populations (two resistant and two susceptible) were carried out using freshly hatched miracidia, according to the methodology described by Vázquez et al. [14]. Briefly, eggs of F. hepatica were incubated in distilled water in total darkness at 28 °C for 15 days to complete maturation. Miracidia hatching was induced by direct exposure of eggs to light. For each assay, we always used 30 individuals of P. columella at varying conditions (see Fig. 1) as described below.
Fig. 1
Fig. 1

Work flow diagram of the experimental exposures performed on P. columella resistant/susceptible-Fasciola hepatica model. The influence of different parasite doses (a) and serial parasite exposures (b) on P. columella phenotypes were assayed using sympatric (Cuban) F. hepatica. c Allopatric F. hepatica exposures

A. Exposure to different doses of F. hepatica miracidia

We exposed each P. columella population separately to single doses of 5, 15 and 30 miracidia (M) from the sympatric isolate of La Palma (Cuba) to increase the probability of exposing host populations to different parasite genotypes.

B. Serial exposure to F. hepatica miracidia

We explored the effect of serial infections with F. hepatica by exposing each P. columella population three times to the standard dose of 5 M [14] of the sympatric F. hepatica isolate of La Palma (Cuba; 3 × 5 M). Each exposure was performed at a three-day interval, after which each snail received a serially-delivered 15 M dose. The selection of the re-infection interval was based on the timing at which the immune response occurs (0 to 3–4 days post-exposure with patent parasite encapsulation as early as 24 h post-exposure; see Gutiérrez et al. [12]), which is also accompanied by possible “consumption” of defence related resources in the snail.

C. Exposure to sympatric and allopatric F. hepatica

We exposed each P. columella population separately to the standard dose of 5 M [14] of each allopatric F. hepatica isolate (Camargue, France and Dajabón, Dominican Republic). In order to save biological material, we used the results of the 5 M dose (see A above), for comparison against sympatric interactions.

In all trials and control groups, snails were individually allocated in 96-well plates and individually exposed overnight to F. hepatica miracidia. Each well was checked to record the penetration of all miracidia into the snails used for each experiment. Snails were maintained at 28 °C and monitored daily. Day-to-day mortality was recorded and exposed snails found dead were carefully dissected [21] to assess infection. Between days 7–10 post-exposure, infection was clearly patent by the presence of rediae in dissected individuals. The number of rediae per infected snail was counted to estimate the intensity of F. hepatica infection (redial burden) [14] per experimental group, always 25 days post-exposure or post-first-exposure in the case of serial exposure trials. Non-exposed snails from the same breeding batch were reared in the laboratory and subjected to the same conditions to serve as control of survival for the infection assays.

Data analysis

The prevalence of F. hepatica in each experimental group was expressed as the percentage of infected snails of all those initially exposed (n = 30); confidence limits were calculated at the 95% confidence level by the Wilson score interval. Differences in prevalence between groups were checked by Fisher’s exact test. Survival curves of exposed snails [from 0–25 days post-(first-)exposure] were constructed based on the number of live snails at each time point divided by the number of exposed individuals and expressed as a percentage. We performed log-rank tests of Kaplan-Meier curves to assess the statistical differences on survivorship data. Data of F. hepatica redial counting per experimental group was checked for normality and variance homogeneity using Shapiro-Wilk and Levene tests, respectively. Factorial ANOVAs followed by a post-hoc multiple comparison Tukey test were carried out to assess statistical significance of the effect of (i) different miracidial doses and serial exposures within host populations, and (ii) allopatric and sympatric (data of experimental infection with Cuban F. hepatica at a 5 M dose) in redial burden. All calculations were performed in Statistica v.12 (StatSoft. Inc., Tulsa, OK, USA) and differences were always considered significant at values of P < 0.05.


Results of host survival in the exposed groups are shown in Fig. 2. Overall, we observed a mortality peak on exposed snails occurring at 24–48 h post-exposure and a significant decrease of snail survival with increasing miracidia dose (Fig. 2a-d; log-rank tests: P < 0.05; Aurora, 5 M vs 30 M, P = 0.24; Negrines, 5 M vs 15 M, P = 1). No mortality was observed within the studied time frame in the control group (non-exposed snails; data not shown).
Fig. 2
Fig. 2

Survival curves of experimentally-exposed resistant (R) and susceptible (S) Pseudosuccinea columella to Fasciola hepatica. Snails were challenged following different approaches: a-c increasing miracidial doses, d serial exposures (SE) and e-f exposure to allopatric F. hepatica isolates. Pairwise comparisons of snail survival between populations at each experimental trial were performed by log-rank tests and are shown. Abbreviation: M, miracidia

Infection outcome in resistant P. columella

As expected, while susceptible P. columella became infected after exposure to F. hepatica, resistant snails from La Palma and La Coca failed to develop larval stages and no sign of infection was observed following each of the experimental approaches tested (Table 1). Notably, resistant populations showed higher overall survival than susceptible P. columella (Fig. 2).
Table 1

Prevalence (95% confidence interval) of Fasciola hepatica in resistant and susceptible Pseudosuccinea columella using different experimental exposure approaches

Experimental infections

Experimental groups

Pseudosuccinea columella populations (%)

La Coca

La Palma



(n = 30)a

(n = 30)a

(n = 30)b

(n = 30)b

Increasing infective dose: sympatric F. hepatica

5 M



66.7 (48.1–85.2)

63.3 (44.4–82.2)

15 M



83.0 (66.4–92.6)

90.0 (74.4–96.5)

30 M



93.3 (78.7–98.2)

80.0 (62.7–90.5)

Serial exposure: sympatric F. hepatica

3 × 5 M



90.0 (74.4–96.5)

100 (88.7–100)

Exposure to allopatric F. hepatica

Dominican Republic 5 M



50.0 (33.1–66.9)

66.7 (48.8–80.8)

France 5 M



13.3 (4.2–29.9)

60.0 (40.7–76.6)

Abbreviation: M miracidia

aResistant populations

bSusceptible populations

Infection outcome in susceptible P. columella, increasing miracidial dose and serial exposures

An overall increase of both prevalence (Fisher’s exact test: Aurora, 5 M vs 30 M, P = 0.021; Negrines, 5 M vs 15 M / 3 × 5 M, P < 0.03; Table 1) and redial burden (Fig. 3a) was noted in susceptible individuals with the increase of the miracidial dose, either by single or serial exposure events. However, no significant differences in prevalence and redial burden were observed when snails were infected with 15 M or 30 M (Fisher’s exact test: Aurora, 15 M vs 30 M, P = 0.423; Negrines, 15 M vs 30, P = 0.472; Fig. 3a).
Fig. 3
Fig. 3

Redial burden of Fasciola hepatica in two susceptible Pseudosuccinea columella populations using different experimental exposures (factorial ANOVA results). a Exposure to different doses of 5, 15 and 30 miracidia (M) and a serial (three times) exposure to 5 miracidia of Cuban F. hepatica (SE: 3 × 5 M) b Exposure to a dose of five miracidia of sympatric (Cuban) and allopatric F. hepatica isolates. Vertical bars denote 95% confidence interval and different letters show differences between means after a post-hoc Tukey test

An interesting result regarding redial burden was observed when comparing infection outcomes after exposures to 15 miracidia, either singly (15 M) or serially-delivered (3 × 5 M; Fig. 3a): it was significantly lower in serially-exposed susceptible snails (Aurora, P = 0.0145; Negrines, P = 0.0326; Fig. 3a). Contrastingly, a similar parasite prevalence was attained with both conditions (Fisher’s exact test: Aurora, P = 0.7065; Negrines, P = 0.2372).

Infection outcome in susceptible P. columella, comparing exposure to sympatric and allopatric F. hepatica isolates

Infection with a 5 M dose of either Cuban and Dominican isolates produced similar prevalence and redial burden in the two susceptible P. columella populations (Table 1, Fig. 3b). However, compared to the Dominican isolate, a significant decrease on snail survivorship was observed with the Cuban parasite (Fig. 2a, e; log-rank tests: P < 0.01).

On the other hand, we found significant differences in compatibility between susceptible P. columella and the French F. hepatica isolate and this variability depended upon the snail-parasite combination (Table 1, Fig. 3b). A poor performance of French F. hepatica, in terms of prevalence and redial burden, was recorded when infecting Aurora snails but it appears as compatible as the Cuban isolate with Negrines (Table 1, Fig. 3b). It is noteworthy that an overall impairment of snail survival on susceptible populations was observed with the French parasite isolate when compared with the sympatric F. hepatica (Fig. 2f; log-rank tests: P < 0.001).


P. columella resistance to F. hepatica remains after high parasite doses, serial exposures and parasites from different geographical origins

Fasciola hepatica infection of its snail host is a dynamic and complex process in which several stages (i.e. snail-finding, penetration, migration, establishment and larval development) and requirements (e.g. biochemical, physiological and immunological), accounting for host-parasite compatibility, must be met to ensure parasite success [22]. In the present study, the experimental exposure of P. columella snails to F. hepatica was followed by the successful penetration of all miracidia into the snails in every trial. After this initial interaction, the first 24–48 h are crucial to the final outcome of the infection. In this time frame, a serial of fundamental events occurs inside the host: (i) complete transformation of miracidia into sporocysts [22]; (ii) migration within the digestive tract and first colonization attempts [23]; and (iii) orchestration of snail defence response, whether protective or not [12]. Either compatible F. hepatica larva survive and become established (the host becomes infected), or no further parasite development occurs and exposed snails are free from infection. Given the complexity of the initial interaction, it is not surprising that a peak of mortality in P. columella occurred during the first 24–48 h post-exposure, even in individuals from resistant populations (see Fig. 2).

As mentioned before, exposure to a large number of miracidia and/or to serial infections could differentially modify the parasite/host possibilities to infect or to be infected, most likely in favour of the parasite [17]. Our results on susceptible P. columella coincide with other investigations that have also rendered higher infection rates, mainly in sympatric snail-trematode combinations, after experimental infections with large numbers of parasite or serial miracidial exposures [17, 24, 25]. This strongly points at the pertinence of the first two experimental schemes used for tipping the scales in favour of parasite success. However, in this sense, the effectiveness of the resistant phenotype was not affected even after being challenged with a large number of miracidia and an enhanced genetic diversity of the parasite (either singly or serially delivered) with which each snail was confronted (F. hepatica isolate from La Palma isolate is known to be polymorphic [15]). Thus, host involvement in defence contributing to parasite elimination in resistant P. columella appears to be enough to protect the snails even from high infective doses without reversion of the resistant phenotype.

In addition, we investigated if resistant P. columella snails could resist other parasite isolates beyond the local (Cuban) isolates, challenging them with geographically distant F. hepatica, in an attempt to increase the chances of exposing the snails to parasites with different genetic diversity. Although there are no data on the genetic population structure of the allopatric F. hepatica isolates used, this species is known to be highly polymorphic with a preferential out-crossing reproduction [26]. Moreover, we should expect genetic differences among the isolates used given the geographical isolation, particularly between the Cuban and the European flukes. In this sense, the differences in F. hepatica performance between allopatric and sympatric isolates when infecting susceptible P. columella suggest significant differences in compatibility depending on host-parasite combination (as seen elsewhere [14]). These differences, most likely related with the assumed genetic differences, were highly marked between F. hepatica from Cuba and France. However, no infection developed in resistant snails exposed to either allopatric F. hepatica used, suggesting that the defence mechanisms involved in the resistant phenotype (protective immune response towards the parasite) might not be tightly restricted to a local genotype-genotype type interaction.

The underlying mechanism mediating the encapsulation of F. hepatica observed in resistant P. columella 24 h post-exposure [12] remains to be fully elucidated. However, mounting an efficient immune response against F. hepatica, or any other parasites, is expected to be costly [27] and would certainly results in trade-off against significant energy and resources of the host. However, host investment in defence might result all-too-costly for some individuals, particularly when parasites are highly pathogenic or virulent (as seen for the French F. hepatica-Aurora snails interaction), if the infective dose is high, or even if the regulatory mechanisms of the host response are not entirely effective. This may explain the decreased survival of resistant snails when exposed to a high miracidia dose, an effect that was also observed by Gutierrez et al. [12]. In any case, and considering both the individual and population levels, resistant P. columella populations failed to develop the infection.

Redial production in relation to high miracidial doses and successive exposure approaches

As for parasite prevalence, redial burden had an overall increase in susceptible snails when infected with doses higher than 5 M. However, the method of delivering the infective parasite dose influenced the parasite count (more rediae in a single 15 M dose compared to serially-exposed snails). This result could be linked to an increased ability to control parasite development on serially-exposed snails driven by boosting defences with the first exposure, a phenomenon commonly known as immune priming. Immune priming is acknowledged to occur in invertebrates and has been previously reported in the system Biomphalaria glabrata-Schistosoma mansoni, where enhanced protection of the host (ranging from decreased prevalence and parasite intensity to complete protection) may appear after subsequent parasite encounters [2830]. According to these authors, the extent of such acquired protection increases towards genetically similar challenges and when re-exposure occurs 10 days after the primary infection. The demonstration of an immunological memory process in susceptible P. columella-F. hepatica deserves further investigations.

On the other hand, no significant variation was observed in infected snails exposed to 15 or 30 M which could be related to intraspecific competition of parasite larvae for host resources. Rondelaud et al. [31] referred that multiple miracidial infections could impact F. hepatica productivity in its intermediate host by limiting redial numbers on second and third generations.

Performance of allopatric F. hepatica with susceptible P. columella snails

In a previous study involving experimental infections with several Cuban F. hepatica-lymnaeid snail combination, Vázquez et al. [14] proposed the existence of a polymorphism of compatibility in this interaction when presented with a variety of outcomes in terms of snail survival and the parasite’s prevalence and redial burden in susceptible snails. From our results, we also observed differences in compatibility between the local and allopatric F. hepatica-P. columella systems that varied depending on the host-parasite combinations.

In this sense, the significantly lower performance of French F. hepatica in susceptible P. columella from Cuba contrasted with what was observed with the Dominican allopatric isolate. The latter displayed a similar prevalence and redial burden to the local Cuban isolate. These results could be related with the peculiarities of the epidemiological scenario from each geographical area (Caribbean and Europe), especially concerning the differences on intermediate host species and environmental conditions. In fact, lymnaeid vectors of fasciolosis in Cuba (Galba cubensis and P. columella) are the same occurring in the Dominican Republic and in most of the Caribbean region [32, 33]. Thus, even when local adaptation of Dominican parasites to Cuban snail populations is improbable due to geographical isolation (both are separated islands), lower differences can be expected between allopatric parasites evolving under similar conditions (e.g. the same host species) and could explain the similar performances recorded between Cuban and Dominican F. hepatica. Conversely, F. hepatica transmission in France is mainly related to other snails (e.g. Galba truncatula and Omphiscola glabra) [34] which could lead to a divergent evolution of the European parasite and may explain its lower compatibility with Cuban P. columella. Rondelaud et al. [35] also observed differential redial development and cercarial production when parasites from Argentina and France were tested against a European G. truncatula. Thus, different vector species from different geographical regions could be particularly important when analysing compatibility of allopatric and sympatric F. hepatica isolates and might bring a deeper understanding on parasite evolution.


We found that resistance in P. columella to F. hepatica infection remains independent of the parasite dose, serial parasite exposures or the geographical origin of the parasite. Conversely, the F. hepatica-susceptible P. columella interaction seems specific for infection and is favoured by high parasite doses. Finally, our results endorse the potential use of resistant P. columella snails as an alternative for the control of parasite transmission.










The authors would like to thank Mercedes Vargas for kindly donating the F. hepatica isolate from the Dominican Republic. We would also like to thank two anonymous reviewers for making insightful comments and useful suggestions which greatly helped in improving the manuscript.


Partial financial support for this investigation was provided by the subventions granted to AA by the French Embassy in Cuba. BG was supported by ANR JCJC INVIMORY (number ANR 13-JSV7-0009) from the French National Research Agency (ANR). ES has been supported by the Tour du Valat and Labex CeMeb.

Availability of data and materials

All data and materials presenting in this research paper are available upon request by contacting AA or BG.

Authors’ contributions

AA designed, performed and analysed the experiments and drafted the manuscript. AV, DD, SH and BG participated in design of the experiments, analysis and the reviewing process. JS, ML and ES participated in the experiments and reviewing process. HH participated in the reviewing process. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Ethics approval and consent to participate

French laboratory holds permit #A66040 for experiments on animals, which was obtained from the French Ministry of Agriculture and Fisheries and the French Ministry of National Education, Research and Technology. The housing, breeding and care of the utilized animals followed the ethical requirements of France. The experimenter possesses an official certificate for animal experimentation from both of the above-listed French ministries (Decree #87–848, October 19, 1987). The various protocols used in this study have been approved by the French Veterinary Agency of the DRAAF Languedoc-Roussillon (Direction Régionale de l’Alimentation, de l’Agriculture et de la Forêt), Montpellier, France (authorization # 007083). The Cuban laboratory of Malacology holds permit for experiments on animals obtained from the Cuban government. The housing, breeding and care of the utilized animals followed the ethical requirements of Cuba. The experimenter possesses an official certificate for animal experimentation from the Cuban government.

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver ( applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.

Authors’ Affiliations

Centro de Investigaciones, Diagnóstico y Referencia, Instituto de Medicina Tropical “Pedro Kourí”, La Habana, Cuba
University of Perpignan Via Domitia, Interactions Hosts Pathogens Environments UMR 5244, CNRS, IFREMER, Univ. Montpellier, F-66860 Perpignan, France
Centre de recherche de la Tour du Valat, Arles, France
MIVEGEC, IRD, CNRS, Univ. Montpellier, Montpellier, France


  1. Mas-Coma S, Bargues MD, Valero MA. Fasciola, lymnaeids and human fascioliasis, with a global overview on disease transmission, epidemiology, evolutionary genetics, molecular epidemiology and control. Adv Parasitol. 2009;69:41–146.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  2. Mas-Coma S. Epidemiology of fascioliasis in human endemic areas. J Helminthol. 2005;79:207–16.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  3. Lounnas M, Correa AC, Vázquez AA, Dia A, Escobar JS, Nicot A, et al. Self-fertilization, long-distance flash invasion and biogeography shape the population structure of Pseudosuccinea columella at the worldwide scale. Mol Ecol. 2017;26:887–903.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  4. Cruz-Reyes A, Malek E. Suitability of six limneaid snails for infection with Fasciola hepatica. Vet Parasitol. 1987;24:203–10.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  5. Gutiérrez A, Vázquez AA, Hevia Y, Sánchez J, Correa AC, Hurtrez-Bouseès S, et al. First report of larval stages of Fasciola hepatica in a wild population of Pseudosuccinea columella from Cuba and the Caribbean. J Helminthol. 2011;85:109–11.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  6. Cucher M, Carnevale S, Prepelitchi L, Labbé J, Wisnivesky-Colli C. PCR diagnosis of Fasciola hepatica in field-collected Lymnaea columella and Lymnaea viatrix snails. Vet Parasitol. 2006;137:74–82.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  7. Pointier JP, Coustau C, Rondelaud D, Theron A. Pseudosuccinea columella (Say 1817) (Gastropoda, Lymnaeidae), snail host of Fasciola hepatica: first record for France in the wild. Parasitol Res. 2007;101:1389–92.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  8. Dar Y, Vignoles P, Rondelaud D, Dreyfuss G. Role of the lymnaeid snail Pseudosuccinea columella in the transmission of the liver fluke Fasciola hepatica in Egypt. J Helminthol. 2015;89:699–706.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  9. Molloy JB, Anderson GR. The distribution of Fasciola hepatica in Queensland, Australia, and the potential impact of introduced snail intermediate hosts. Vet Parasitol. 2006;137:62–6.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  10. Cowie R. Invertebrate invasions on Pacific Islands and the replacement of unique native faunas: a synthesis of the land and freshwater snails. Biol Invasions. 2001;3:119–36.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  11. Pointier JP, Marquet G. Taxonomy and distribution of freshwater mollusks of French Polynesia. Jap J Malacol. 1990;48:147–60.Google Scholar
  12. Gutiérrez A, Pointier JP, Yong M, Sánchez J, Théron A. Evidence of phenotypic differences between resistant and susceptible isolates of Pseudosuccinea columella (Gastropoda: Lymnaeidae) to Fasciola hepatica (Trematoda: Digenea) in Cuba. Parasitol Res. 2003;90:129–34.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  13. Calienes AF, Fraga J, Pointier JP, Yong M, Sánchez J, Coustau C, et al. Detection and genetic distance of resistant populations of Pseudosuccinea columella (Mollusca: Lymnaeidae) to Fasciola hepatica (Trematoda: Digenea) using RAPD markers. Acta Trop. 2004;92:83–7.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  14. Vázquez AA, Sánchez J, Pointier JP, Théron A, Hurtrez-Boussès S. Fasciola hepatica in Cuba: compatibility of different isolates with two intermediate intermediate hosts, Galba cubensis and Pseudosuccinea columella. J Helminthol. 2014;88:434–40.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  15. Vázquez AA, Lounnas M, Sánchez J, Alba A, Milesi A, Hurtrez-Boussés S. Genetic and infective diversity of the common liver fluke Fasciola hepatica (Trematoda: Digenea) from Cuba. J Helminthol. 2016;90:719–25.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  16. Jokela J, Schmid-Hempel P, Rigby MC. Dr. Pangloss restrained by the Red Queen - steps towards a unified defence theory. Oikos. 2000;89:267–74.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  17. Osnas EE, Lively CM. Immune response to sympatric and allopatric parasites in a snail-trematode interaction. Front Zool. 2005;2:8.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  18. Kawecki T, Ebert D. Conceptual issues in local adaptation. Ecol Lett. 2004;7:1225–41.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  19. Gasnier N, Rondelaud D, Abrous M, Carreras F, Boulard C, Diez-Baños P, et al. Allopatric combination of Fasciola hepatica and Lymnaea truncatula is more efficient than sympatric ones. Int J Parasitol. 2000;30:573–8.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  20. Sánchez R, Perera G, Sánchez J. Cultivo de Fossaria cubensis (Pfeiffer) (Pulmonata: Lymnaeidae) hospedero intermediario de Fasciola hepatica (Linnaeus) en Cuba. Rev Cubana Med Trop. 1995;47:71–3.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. Caron Y, Rondelaud D, Rosson B. The detection and quantification of a digenean infection in the snail host with emphasis in Fasciola sp. Parasitol Res. 2008;103:735–44.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  22. Andrews SJ. The life cycle of Fasciola hepatica. In: Dalton JP, editor. Fasciolosis. Wallingford, UK: CAB International; 1999. p. 1–30.Google Scholar
  23. Magalhães KC, Jannotti-Passos LK, Caldeira RL, Aires ME, Muller G, Carvalho OS, et al. Isolation and detection of Fasciola hepatica DNA in Lymnaea viatrix from formalin-fixed and paraffin-embedded tissues through multiplex-PCR. Vet Parasitol. 2008;152:333–8.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  24. Théron A, Rognon A, Gourbal B, Mitta G. Multi-parasite host susceptibility and multi-host parasite infectivity: a new approach of the Biomphalaria glabrata/Schistosoma mansoni compatibility polymorphism. Infect Genet Evol. 2014;26:80–8.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  25. Dar Y, Lounnas M, Djuikwo F, Teukeng FF, Mouzet R, Courtioux B, et al. Variations in local adaptation of allopatric Fasciola hepatica to French Galba truncatula in relation to parasite origin. Parasitol Res. 2013;112:2543–9.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  26. Cwiklinsky K, Dalton JP, Dufresne PJ, La Course J, Williams DJL, Hodgkinson J, et al. The Fasciola hepatica genome: gene duplication and polymorphism reveals adaptation to the host environment and the capacity for rapid evolution. Genome Biol. 2015;16:71.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  27. Carton Y, Nappi AJ, Poirie M. Genetics of anti-parasite resistance in invertebrates. Dev Comp Immunol. 2005;29:9–32.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  28. Sire C, Rognon A, Theron A. Failure of Schistosoma mansoni to reinfect Biomphalaria glabrata snails: acquired humoral resistance or intra-specific larval antagonism? Parasitology. 1998;117:117–22.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  29. Portela J, Duval D, Rognon A, Galinier R, Boissier J, Coustau C, et al. Evidence for specific genotype-dependent immune priming in the lophotrochozoan Biomphalaria glabrata snail. J Innate Immunol. 2013;5:261–76.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  30. Pinaud S, Portela J, Duval D, Nowacki FC, Olive MA, Allienne JF, et al. A shift from cellular to humoral responses contributes to innate immune memory in the vector snail Biomphalaria glabrata. PLoS Pathog. 2016;12:e1005361.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  31. Rondelaud D, Belfaiza M, Vignoles P, Moncef M, Dreyfuss G. Redial generations of Fasciola hepatica: a review. J Helminthol. 2009;83:245–54.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  32. Gomez JD, Vargas M, Malek EA. Freshwater mollusks of the Dominican Republic. Nautilus. 1986;100:130–4.Google Scholar
  33. Vázquez AA, Hevia Y, Sánchez J. Distribución y preferencia de hábitats de moluscos hospederos intermediarios de Fasciola hepatica en Cuba. Rev Cubana Med Trop. 2009;61:248–53.Google Scholar
  34. Correa AC, De Meeûs T, Dreyfuss G, Rondelaud D, Hurtrez-Boussès S. Galba truncatula and Fasciola hepatica: Genetic costructures and interactions with intermediate host dispersal. Infect Genet Evol. 2017;55:186–94.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  35. Rondelaud D, Sanabria R, Vignoles P, Dreyfuss G, Romero J. Fasciola hepatica: variations in redial development and cercarial production in relation to the geographic origin of the parasite. Parasite. 2013;20:33.View ArticleGoogle Scholar


© The Author(s). 2018


By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate. Please note that comments may be removed without notice if they are flagged by another user or do not comply with our community guidelines.