Skip to content

Advertisement

  • Research
  • Open Access

Distribution of Anopheles vectors and potential malaria transmission stability in Europe and the Mediterranean area under future climate change

Parasites & Vectors201912:18

https://doi.org/10.1186/s13071-018-3278-6

©  The Author(s). 2019

  • Received: 12 October 2018
  • Accepted: 21 December 2018
  • Published:

Abstract

Background

In the scope of climate change the possible recurrence and/or expansion of vector-borne diseases poses a major concern. The occurrence of vector competent Anopheles species as well as favorable climatic conditions may lead to the re-emergence of autochthonous malaria in Europe and the Mediterranean area. However, high-resolution assessments of possible changes of Anopheles vector distributions and of potential malaria transmission stability in the European-Mediterranean area under changing climatic conditions during the course of the 21st century are not available yet.

Methods

Boosted Regression Trees are applied to relate climate variables and land cover classes to vector occurrences. Changes in future vector distributions and potential malaria transmission stability due to climate change are assessed using state-of-the art regional climate model simulations.

Results

Distinct changes in the distributions of the dominant vectors of human malaria are to be expected under climate change. In general, temperature and precipitation changes will lead to a northward spread of the occurrences of Anopheles vectors. Yet, for some Mediterranean areas, occurrence probabilities may decline.

Conclusions

Potential malaria transmission stability is increased in areas where the climatic changes favor vector occurrences as well as significantly impact the vectorial capacity. As a result, vector stability shows the highest increases between historical and future periods for the southern and south-eastern European areas. Anopheles atroparvus, the dominant vector in large parts of Europe, might play an important role with respect to changes of the potential transmission stability.

Keywords

  • Vector distributions
  • Malaria epidemiology
  • Malaria reemergence
  • Regional Climate Models

Background

In Europe and the Mediterranean area widespread elimination of malaria could be achieved during the 20th century [1]. The decline of malaria is strongly related to socio-economic improvements such as wealth, life expectancy and urbanization [2]. However, in recent years an increasing number of imported malaria cases occurs due to international travel and immigrants from malaria-endemic countries [3]. Together with the occurrence of vector competent Anopheles species and favorable climatic conditions autochthonous malaria cases may re-emerge in countries where malaria was previously eradicated. Since the late 1990s locally transmitted cases have been reported in Germany, the Netherlands, Spain, France, Italy, Greece and Turkey [4]. In general, malaria transmission in Europe is highly seasonal owing to temperate climatic conditions. The Mediterranean area, with mild and wet winters and hot and dry summers, has been and still is suitable for malaria transmission. The dominant Anopheles vector species in Europe and the Mediterranean are currently Anopheles atroparvus, An. labranchiae, An. messeae, An. sacharovi, An. sergentii and An. superpictus [5]. Autochthonous malaria in Europe is mainly caused by the human malaria parasite Plasmodium vivax [6].

Projections of future climate change show that there will be significant warming rates until the end of the 21st century, strongest over north-eastern Europe in winter and over Central Europe and the Mediterranean area in summer. Precipitation is projected to increase mainly over North Europe in winter, whereas South Europe and the Mediterranean will likely see decreases the whole year round [7]. An assessment of possible future changes of the length of the malaria transmission season using climate output from General Circulation Models (GCMs) and different malaria impact models shows that until the 2080s a northward shift of the malaria epidemic belt over central-northern Europe might occur [6]. Medlock & Leach [8] concluded in a review study for the UK that under climate change more than two months of P. vivax transmission by 2030, and four months by 2080 could arise. For Lower Saxony in Germany Schröder & Schmidt [9] showed that in the second half of the 20th century the temperature-dependent malaria transmission rate of An. atroparvus from May to October was two months and might take values up to five or six months until the end of the 21st century.

In the context of global climate change GCMs are typically used to obtain large-scale climate information for future periods. However, GCMs do not provide reliable information on regional to local scales. Thus, different downscaling approaches have been developed. In general, they can be divided into statistical downscaling (establishing a statistical link between large-scale atmospheric predictors and regional to local climate) and dynamical downscaling, i.e. nesting a regional climate model (RCM) into a GCM with higher grid box resolution [10]. Current RCMs can reproduce the most important climatic features such as temperature and precipitation at regional scales, but some important biases still remain. These refer for instance to local heavy precipitation events and are related to the convective parameterizations, grid resolution and other aspects of the model formulation [10]. Therefore, a correction method such as quantile mapping (QM) is usually applied to the RCM output [11]. QM adjusts the cumulative distribution function of a simulated variable to match the cumulative distribution function of observed values. Gutiérrez et al. [11] found in an intercomparison of different downscaling techniques for temperature and precipitation in the European area that empirical QM including a seasonal component performs with very small biases.

The present study investigates distribution changes of dominant Anopheles vectors of human malaria in the greater European area for the 21st century under climate change. It builds on previous work of Sinka et al. [5] and Kuhn et al. [12] who modelled the current distribution of dominant Anopheles vectors in Europe using environmental and climatic variables. Variables in these studies included i.a. monthly temperature and precipitation values, elevation, and land cover classes [12, 13]. The focus of the present study is to assess future vector distribution changes due to climate change using state-of-the art RCM simulations. As in Sinka et al. [5, 13] Boosted Regression Trees (BRTs, [14]) are applied to relate climate variables and land-cover classes to vector occurrences. Bias-corrected temperature and precipitation from two different GCM-RCM setups under two emission scenarios are used to assess regional climate suitability of Anopheles vectors in Europe and the Mediterranean area under future climate change. Only changes of the climatic influences on the vector distribution are considered in the regional projections, since environmental effects such as land use changes are currently not implemented in the standard RCM generation. Finally, potential malaria transmission stability during the 21st century is assessed, which builds on the vector stability index of [15].

Methods

Anopheles occurrence data

Occurrence data of the dominant Anopheles vectors in Europe come from the distribution maps of Sinka et al. [5]. These authors used the Malaria Atlas Project library, a literature research and expert opinion maps to produce maps of Anopheles occurrences. Occurrence data refer basically to the period 1985–2009. The presence-absence information of the six Anopheles vectors (An. atroparvus, An. labranchiae, An. messeae, An. sacharovi, An. sergentii and An. superpictus), which is provided as Shapefiles in the electronic supplementary material of Sinka et al. [5], was rasterized to a 0.25° resolution to match the grid resolution of the observation-based climate data.

Climate data

Observational data

Mean, minimum and maximum temperature as well as precipitation data were taken from the daily 0.25° E-OBS dataset version 17 provided by the European Climate Assessment & Dataset (ECA&D [16]). A European-Mediterranean domain was selected, covering 75.375–25.375°N and 19.875°W49.875°E. Data in the time period 1950–2009 were selected. The time period 1985–2009, which is mainly used for subsequent analysis, was filtered for missing values for each month separately. A particular month was considered complete if there were less than three missing days per month, and the time series was considered complete if there were less than four missing months in the period 1985–2009. Grid boxes which did not meet these conditions were removed. Monthly temperature means (in Kelvin K) as well as monthly precipitation totals were calculated from the daily data.

Model data

RCM simulations carried out in the framework of EURO-CORDEX (European branch of the Coordinated Regional Climate Downscaling Experiment [17]) are employed. In the present study data with the grid resolution of about 50 km (0.44° on a rotated grid) are considered and conservatively regridded to 0.25° in order to match the E-OBS grid resolution. KNMI-RACMO22E driven by the GCM EC-EARTH as well as CLMcom-CCLM4-8-17 driven by MPI-ESM-LR were chosen as RCM simulations. The two RCMs were selected according to their good performance over Europe in the observational period [18]. Historical runs for the period 1950–2005 (KNMI-RACMO22E) and 1960–2005 (CLMcom-CCLM4-8-17) as well as scenario runs for the period 2006–2100 under RCP4.5 and RCP8.5 scenario assumptions [19] were available for subsequent analyses.

Land cover data

Land cover information was used in the form of 22 categories of land cover from the GlobCover project [20]. GlobCover3 2009 V.2.3 land cover map is derived by an automatic and regionally-tuned classification of a time series of global ERIS (Medium Resolution Imaging Spectrometer Instrument) Fine Resolution mosaics for the year 2009. The land cover classes, defined with the United Nations Land Cover Classification System, have a 300 × 300 m resolution. To match the E-OBS grid resolution, land cover information was calculated as percent coverage of each class in a particular 0.25° grid box.

Correction of model data

Transfer functions were defined to match the RCM output of a variable Pm (temperature, precipitation) in the historical period with the statistical properties of a variable Po from the E-OBS observations. The non-parametric empirical quantile method suggested in [21] and implemented in the qmap package in R was used. The transfer functions were subsequently used to correct the RCM output of the historical and the future periods. According to Gudmundsson et al. [21], the transformation is defined as:
$$ {P}_o={F}_o^{-1}\left({F}_m\left({P}_m\right)\right) $$
(1)

where Fm is the cumulative distribution function (CDF) of Pm and \( {F}_o^{-1} \) is the inverse CDF (quantile function) corresponding to Po.

The empirical CDFs were approximated using empirical percentiles at a fixed interval of 0.01. Values in between the percentiles were approximated using a linear interpolation. A threshold for the correction of the number of wet days was estimated from the empirical probability of non-zero values in Po. The correction of the daily values at each grid box was done for each month separately to account for seasonality.

The performance of QM was assessed by using a split-sampling validation approach. For KNMI-RACMO22E the historical model output comprises the years 1950–2005, which was split into the 30-year calibration periods 1950–1979 and 1976–2005. Bias correction was done for each of the two calibration periods and the performance was validated in the two, from the correction independent, 26-year periods 1980–2005 and 1950–1975, respectively. For CLMcom-CCLM4-8-17 historical model output was available for the period 1960–2005 and the 25-year calibration periods 1960–1984 and 1981–2005 were used for setting up the transfer functions between observed and modelled values. The statistical bias correction was subsequently validated in the independent 21-year periods 1985–2005 and 1960–1980, respectively. Root mean square error (RMSE) between observed and modelled values was used as performance measure. RMSE is calculated for the arithmetic means across all grid cells, assuming an equal weight for each cell. Thus, it serves as a cumulative measure of the bias over the considered domain.

Distribution modelling and projection

Climate data (mean, minimum and maximum temperature and precipitation) of each month separately in the time period 1985–2009 as well as the land cover data served as predictors for vector occurrences. In order to quantify the relationships between vector occurrences with climate and land cover variables and to map and project the occurrences under present and future climate conditions Boosted Regression Trees (BRTs) were used. Detailed descriptions of BRT are provided by Elith et al. [14] and Hastie et al. [22]. BRT combines regression trees and boosting. BRT attempts to minimize a loss function, which involves jointly optimizing the number of trees, learning rate, and tree complexity. The learning rate is used to shrink the contribution of each tree as it is added to the model. Slowing the learning rate increases the number of trees required. In general, a smaller learning rate (and consequently a larger number of trees) is preferable. Tree complexity (number of nodes in a tree) relates to the interaction order in the predictand. With increasing tree complexity, learning rate must be decreased if sufficient trees are to be fitted to minimize predictive error. The tree complexity should reflect the correct interaction order in the response variable. However, since an adequate tree complexity is usually unknown, it is best evaluated using independent data. As in Elith et al. [14] the optimal number of trees, learning rate and tree complexity were estimated with a cross-validation approach, using deviance reduction as performance measure. The dismo and gbm packages in R were used to assess the optimal number of boosting trees using 10-fold cross-validation. In the present study models were developed with 50% of the data, and were validated with the remaining data. Tree complexity of 2 up to 8, and learning rates of 0.005, 0.1 and 0.5 were evaluated.

The modeling of the vector distributions using BRT requires both presence and absence data. The lack of confirmed absences in the occurrence data was addressed by the production of artificial absence data, called pseudo-absences. The pseudo-absences are all grid boxes outside of the suitable area, which is estimated by a rectilinear surface range envelope [23]. Following the recommendation of Barbet-Massin et al. [24] the same number of pseudo-absences as presences was tested (ratio 1:1, with 1000 presences and 1000 pseudo-absences randomly selected from the available data). Additionally, ratios of 5:1 (5000 pseudo-absences and 1000 presences) and 10:1 (5000 pseudo-absences and 500 presences) were also tested, since Sinka et al. [5], although using different predictor data and BRT setup, found the best overall performance for the European and Middle Eastern Anopheles species with a ratio of 10:1 pseudo-absences to presence. Model validation was subsequently done using the remaining independent data not used for model building. The BRT model was used to predict vector occurrences to the independent data and the result was taken for evaluation of the model. As statistics on predictive performance deviance, correlation, discrimination and Kappa were estimated and results were also evaluated visually. Details on cross-validation and performance measures can be found for instance in [25–27].

Subsequently, the best performing BRT configuration was used to project vector occurrences under future climate change. For this purpose, the bias-corrected RCM data were taken as new predictor data in the BRTs. The projected occurrences were evaluated for the historical period 1985–2005, and the two scenario periods 2040–2060 and 2080–2100.

Potential malaria transmission stability

The vector stability index (VSI) of Kiszewski et al. [15] is used to generate maps of the future potential malaria transmission stability under climate change:
$$ \boldsymbol{VSI}=\sum \limits_{\boldsymbol{m}=\mathbf{1}}^{\mathbf{12}}{\boldsymbol{a}}_{\boldsymbol{i},\boldsymbol{m}}^{\mathbf{2}}{\boldsymbol{p}}_{\boldsymbol{i},\boldsymbol{m}}^{\boldsymbol{E}}/-\mathbf{\ln}\left({\boldsymbol{p}}_{\boldsymbol{i},\boldsymbol{m}}\right) $$
(2)

where m is month; i is vector; a is the human-biting proportion (0−1); p is the daily survival rate (0−1); and E is the length of extrinsic incubation period in days (for P. vivax E = 105/T-14.5). VSI was calculated for each vector i. The parameters a and p for each Anopheles species were taken from the publication of Kiszewski et al. [15]. Within the calculation of the length of extrinsic incubation period E, mean temperature (T) of the historical time slice 1985–2005 as well as of the future time slices 2040–2060 and 2080–2100, taken from the bias-corrected RCM data, were used. The vector-specific VSI results were integrated into an overall information by multiplying the VSI value with the modelled occurrence probability for each vector at each grid box. The VSI of that vector which has the highest value of combined VSI and occurrence probability at a particular grid box was subsequently mapped.

Results

Vector and climate data

The filtering procedure (completeness check) of the climate data resulted in 20,632 grid boxes to be used for subsequent analyses. Grid boxes with vector presence but no available climate data were excluded from further analyses. The rasterization of the Anopheles occurrence data to the 0.25° grid yielded 7850 grid boxes of presences for An. atroparvus (38% of the European-Mediterranean land area with available climate data), 1494 grid boxes for An. labranchiae (7.2%), 13,490 grid boxes for An. messeae (65.4%), 2449 grid boxes An. sacharovi (11.9%), 1221 grid boxes for An. sergentii (5.9%) and 2495 grid boxes for An. superpictus (12.1%). The rasterized distribution maps are given in Additional file 1: Figure S1.

Regional climate model bias correction

Correction of the RCM data using empirical quantile mapping reduced the bias of KNMI-RACMO22E precipitation by 0.17 mm/day to a bias, averaged across all months, of 0.43 mm/day. For temperature, the bias was reduced by 1.35 K to an average bias of 1.14 K for mean temperature, by 1.62 K to 1.2 K for minimum temperature, and by 1.66 K to 1.14 K for maximum temperature. The bias of CLMcom-CCLM4-8-17 precipitation was0.38 mm/day lower compared to the raw RCM output and amounted after bias correction to 0.47 mm/day averaged over all months. Mean temperature bias was reduced by 0.62 K to 0.8 K, minimum temperature by 0.52 K to 0.84 K, and maximum temperature by 1.56 K to 0.87 K. The individual monthly values for all variables of both RCMs are tabulated in Additional file 1: Table S1.

Vector distribution models

From the different configurations tested the best performance of the BRTs was achieved with learning rate = 0.005 and bag fraction = 0.5. For An. atroparvus and An. messeae, which have a widespread occurrence in the European area and thus have a more equal number of grid boxes with presence to absence, the ratio 1:1 of pseudo-absence to presence data and tree complexity of 2 yields the best BRT model performance. For An. labranchiae, An. sacharovi, An. sergentii and An. superpictus, which have a smaller geographical range, the ratio 10:1 of pseudo-absence to presence and tree complexity of 3 gave the best results. Additional file 1: Table S2 and Figure S2 show for each vector the predictive performance of the best-performing BRT and maps of the modelled occurrence probabilities, respectively. The modelled spatial distributions showed a high agreement with the reference occurrence data (Additional file 1: Figure S1). The most noticeable discrepancy occurred for An. atroparvus over the southern parts of the Iberian Peninsula, where vector presence is missed in the modelling.

The information about the contribution of each predictor variable to the model is based on the number of times a variable is selected for splitting, weighted by the squared improvement to the model as a result of each split, and averaged over all trees [14]. For An. atroparvus the most important temperature predictors (relative importance > 5%) were temperature conditions in early spring. The fitted functions revealed that the 0 °C threshold is of particular importance in this regard. A similar relationship emerged for An. labranchiae. For An. sacharovi and An. superpictus, maximum temperatures in early spring up to approx. 10–15 °C were positively related to occurrence. For An. messeae, mean temperature in spring was selected in the BRTs. These results point to the relevance of temperature conditions at the end of the hibernation period/beginning of the active period. For An. superpictus, high maximum temperatures in autumn were favorable as well. For An. messeae, an optimum maximum temperature range in autumn at the beginning of the hibernation period was also relevant. Overall, vector occurrences showed the highest dependence on temperature conditions in the transitional seasons at the beginning/end of the active and hibernation periods.

The contribution of precipitation in summer and early autumn in the BRTs for An. atroparvus indicates the importance of sufficient water during the aquatic life-cycle. For An. messeae precipitation in spring and early summer was highly relevant; for An. labranchiae precipitation in spring and early autumn played an important role. Anopheles sacharovi showed a great dependence on climate conditions (minimum and mean temperature, rainfall) in summer, the peak time of the adult activity. The occurrence of the North African species An. sergentii was almost completely governed by rainfall conditions in summer. While in general precipitation was positively connected with Anopheles occurrences, very high monthly precipitation amounts can also have a reverse impact on occurrences. This applies to spring precipitation amounts for An. messeae, and to summer precipitation for An. sacharovi and An. sergentii.

Land cover classes with a relative predictor importance > 5% were only present in the BRTs for An. atroparvus, An. labranchiae and An. superpictus. Rainfed croplands (high fractions of this land cover class were positively related to An. atroparvus occurrence; closed to open (> 15%) shrubland were negatively related to the occurrence of the Mediterranean species An. labranchiae and An. superpictus; mosaic cropland (50–70%)/vegetation (20–50%) were positively related to An. labranchiae occurrence; and closed (> 40%) broadleaved deciduous forest were positively related to An. superpictus occurrence. In summary, climatic predictors clearly dominated as important predictors in the BRTs.

Projections of vector distributions

Figure 1 shows the modelled probabilities of vector occurrences for the historical period 1985–2005, and the two scenario periods 2040–2060 and 2080–2100 under the RCP8.5 scenario for each vector. Shown is the mean value from the BRT predictions using bias-corrected temperature and precipitation of the two RCMs KNMI-RACMO22E and CLMcom-CCLM4-8-17 as new predictor data. Projections based on the RCP4.5 scenario yielded similar, although weaker tendencies of distribution changes.
Fig. 1
Fig. 1

Modelled probabilities of vector occurrences. Shown are the results for the historical period 1985–2005, and the two scenario periods 2040–2060 and 2080–2100 under RCP8.5 scenario for An. atroparvus (a-c), An. labranchiae (d-f), An. messeae (g-i), An. sacharovi (j-l), An. sergentii (m-o), and An. superpictus (p-r). Shown is the ensemble mean from the two RCMs KNMI-RACMO22E and CLMcom-CCLM4-8-17. Grid boxes with vector presence in the observational period but no available observational climate data are marked in grey. Also, note the eastern boundary of the RCM domain at 45°E

Most noticeable is the northward spread of the vectors An. atroparvus and An. messeae until the end of the 21st century, with concurrent disappearance of An. messeae over the western parts of Europe. Anopheles labranchiae, An. sacherovi and An. superpictus also showed northward extensions, but often with lower occurrence probabilities in the newly emerging areas. In contrast, vector occurrences in the Mediterranean area were generally mostly declining. Most pronounced was the reduction of the occurrence area of An. superpictus, An. sacharovi and An. sergentii over the eastern Mediterranean area and North Africa under future climate conditions.

The distribution changes were strongly governed by the general increases of temperature. In particular, the strong temperature increases over north-eastern Europe and the Mediterranean area in spring and autumn played a role in this regard. Furthermore, changes of the precipitation pattern in summer, with increases over north-eastern Europe and strong decreases over the Mediterranean area as well as southern and western Europe, accounted for the changes, specifically for An. messeae and An. sergentii. Since both, and in particular An. sergentii, heavily rely on summer rainfall, their occurrence probabilities were noticeably reduced until the end of the 21st century.

Potential malaria transmission stability in the 21st century

Potential malaria transmission stability during the 21st century was assessed based on the VSI. The spatial index includes the most important intrinsic properties of anopheline mosquito vectors of malaria that interact with climate to determine vectorial capacity. The index examines potential transmission stability, and thus the index includes “anophelism (with as well as) without malaria” [15].

Figure 2 depicts the VSI for the historical period 1985–2005 as well as for the period 2080–2100 under the RCP8.5 scenario assumptions. RCM ensemble mean temperatures were used as climate data input for the calculation of the length of the extrinsic incubation period. Under historical climate conditions, there was in general a low force of transmission throughout Europe. Under RCP.8.5 conditions, large parts of the southern and south-eastern European area emerged as regions with a relatively high stability of potential malaria transmission. From the belt of high VSI values southwards towards North Africa as well as northwards towards Scandinavia, transmission stability declined. The decrease of malaria transmission stability to the south was mainly related to the projected rainfall reductions and the resulting decline of vector occurrences due to the drought-induced inhibition of the aquatic life-cycle of the vectors An. sergentii and also partly An. labranchiae. In contrast, the general northward decline from the belt of high stability points to the limitation of malaria transmission by temperature. The values of the VSI in central and northern Europe are controlled primarily by An. atroparvus, in northern Scandinavia by An. messeae. The temperature increases until the end of the 21st century suffice to have the vectors spread throughout Europe. However, the climatic changes only impacted the transmission stability in southern and south-eastern Europe, whereas the length of the extrinsic incubation period was still temperature-limited over northern Europe.
Fig. 2
Fig. 2

Vector Stability Index. Shown are the values for the historical period 1985–2005 (a) and for the scenario period 2080–2100 under the RCP8.5 scenario (b). White areas denote regions with no observational and/or RCM data

Discussion

The statistical models showed that occurrences of An. atroparvus, An. labranchiae, An. messeae, An. sacharovi, An. sergentii and An. superpictus are highly related to climate. This confirms the high climate sensitivity of Anopheles vectors as already identified in previous studies, e.g. [5, 12]. In this regard, temperature in the transitional seasons as well as rainfall during summer are of particular importance. The results point to the impact of climate on specific parts of the vectors life-cycle - temperature mainly influences the active and hibernation periods of adult mosquitoes, whereas rainfall is particularly important for the aquatic life stages. Precipitation was mostly positively connected with Anopheles occurrences. However, very high monthly precipitation amounts can also have a reverse impact on occurrences. Anopheles messeae and An. sergentii prefer freshwater sites with very slow flowing or stagnant water [28], so that a prevention of breeding sites by high rainfall amounts can occur. Anopheles sacharovi is described as a highly adaptive species, developing in all kinds of brackish as well as fresh water habitats [28]. However, the species is sensible to organic pollutants [29]. Thus, it can be speculated that intense rainfall events may import pollutants into its habitat yielding a reduced species occurrence.

Despite the finding that climatic predictors perform much better in the BRTs compared to land use information, it should be investigated how future land use changes may change vector occurrences. In the past, drainage of wetlands and new farming techniques substantially contributed to the eradication of malaria in Europe [4, 28]. In contrast, ongoing land use changes such as crop irrigation and urbanization may create new breeding sites [30]. In the present study An. atroparvus and An. labranchiae occurrences were found to be positively related to cropland, whereas An. labranchiae and An. superpictus occurrences were negatively related to shrubland. It remains to be investigated how dynamic land use changes will alter the vector distributions in the future. A promising approach represents the Flagship Pilot Study “LUCAS” (Land Use & Climate Across Scales) for Europe, as a EURO-CORDEX & LUCID initiative, giving the prospect to consider consistently land use and climate changes in future studies of vector distribution.

The present study highlights that distinct changes in the distributions of the dominant vectors of human malaria are to be expected under the constraints of future climate change. Temperature and precipitation changes will lead to a northward spread of the occurrences of Anopheles vectors. This result is in general agreement with the findings from the global-scale, multi-model malaria assessment of Caminade et al. [6]. However, RCMs provide more detailed spatial patterns compared to GCMs, which allows for an improved analysis of the relationships of vector distribution and transmission stability with climatic changes. Thus, the high-resolution projections of the present study showed that for some Mediterranean areas occurrence probabilities may decline, mainly due to projected rainfall decreases.

Furthermore, the modelled expansions of vector distributions in the future do not automatically imply a concurrent increase of the potential malaria transmission stability. Transmission stability was only increased in areas where the climatic changes favor vector occurrences as well as yield enough temperature rise to significantly impact the vectorial capacity. As a consequence of this, the VSI showed the highest increases between historical and future periods for the southern and south-eastern European areas. Anopheles atroparvus is the dominant vector in large parts of Europe under present as well as future climate conditions. In addition, it has the highest human-biting proportion and daily survival rate of the European vectors [15]. The increases of the duration of the transmission season and of the extrinsic incubation period assigns this vector an important role with respect to changes of the potential transmission stability. Countries affected by an increased malaria risk comprised for instance Spain, southern France, Italy, Greece, the eastern European countries Bulgaria, Romania, Macedonia and Serbia as well as southern Ukraine and Russia (Fig. 2). For Turkey no information was available due to the widespread lack of reliable observational climate data.

This study is one of the first high-resolution assessment of the impact of future climate change on vector distributions and potential transmission stability in the European and Mediterranean area using state-of-the-art climate scenarios. Further improvements may be possible through the consideration of a more diverse influence of temperature on the transmission intensity of malaria. For instance, Shapiro et al. [31] experimentally showed by means of An. stephensi and P. falciparum that there are complex relationships of temperature with adult mosquito longevity, human-biting rate, the developmental period of the parasite within the mosquito, and the proportion of mosquitoes that become infectious. Paajmans et al. [32] illustrated that the extrinsic incubation period of P. falciparum is modified by including the diurnal temperature range and day length in comparison to estimates based on mean temperature values only. While there is a high climate model agreement with respect to mean temperature and precipitation changes, the use of extremes and further explanatory variables, like e.g. wind speed or evapotranspiration will require a careful evaluation of the projection uncertainties related to these variables. Appropriate downscaling techniques have to be applied in this context, which involves the availability of reliable observational data as reference as well as specific methods, which preserve the physical consistency between variables and adequately adjust the extreme parts of the distributions [33].

Furthermore, important non-climatic factors such as population growth and urbanization, migration changes, and economic development should be considered for future risk assessments. Malaria declined rapidly in Europe during the 20th century due to the implementation of national elimination programs, involving for instance draining of wetlands, insecticide spraying, and improvements of health infrastructures [4]. Yet a high number of imported malaria cases from endemic to non-endemic countries is reported, e.g. 2169 cases per year in the period 2005–2015 for France, 637 cases for Italy, 374 cases for Spain [34]. In addition, the local reappearance of malaria in some parts of southern Europe is observed in recent years [3]. Migration and economic hardship are considered as critical variables with respect to the vulnerability of a region [4]. Moreover, with respect to ongoing urbanization, novel breeding sites become available. For instance, special attention has recently been given to An. plumbeus, which exploits man-made breeding sites, is able to transmit P. falciparum, and has a high human-biting proportion [35]. Thus, further investigations should also consider this vector. In addition, very high-resolution climate and land-use modeling, which resolves the sub-urban scale, should be used for risk assessment.

Conclusions

Potential malaria transmission stability is increased in areas where the climatic changes favor vector occurrences as well as significantly impact the vectorial capacity. As a result, vector stability shows the highest increases between historical and future periods for the southern and south-eastern European areas. Anopheles atroparvus, the dominant vector in large parts of Europe, might play an important role with respect to changes of the potential transmission stability. Risk assessments of malaria in view of climate change as well as of other factors like land use changes and ongoing urbanization are of particular importance on the local scale. The present contribution adds to the current research by providing high-resolution projections of climate-induced changes in Europe and the Mediterranean area.

Abbreviations

BRT: 

Boosted regression trees

GCM: 

General circulation model

RCM: 

Regional climate model

VSI: 

Vector stability index

Declarations

Acknowledgements

I acknowledge the data providers in the ECA&D project, the World Climate Research Programmeʼs Working Group on Regional Climate, and the ESA GlobCover 2009 Project.

Funding

Not applicable.

Availability of data and materials

The E-OBS dataset is available from http://www.ecad.eu. The EURO-CORDEX data can be downloaded from links on https://euro-cordex.net/060378/index.php.en. The GlobCover data is available under http://due.esrin.esa.int/page_globcover.php.

Authorsʼ contributions

EH designed the study, performed the research, and wrote the manuscript. The author read and approved the final manuscript.

Ethics approval and consent to participate

Not applicable.

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Competing interests

The author declares that she has no competing interests.

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.

Authors’ Affiliations

(1)
Institute of Geography, University of Augsburg, Alter Postweg 118, 86135 Augsburg, Germany

References

  1. Feachem RG, Phillips AA, Hwang J, Cotter C, Wielgosz B, Greenwood BM, et al. Shrinking the malaria map: progress and prospects. Lancet. 2010;1566:1578.Google Scholar
  2. Zhao X, Smith DL, Tatem AJ. Exploring the spatiotemporal drivers of malaria elimination in Europe. Malar J. 2016;15:122.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  3. Odolini S, Gautret P, Parola P. Epidemiology of imported malaria in the Mediterranean region. Mediterr J Hematol Infect Dis. 2012;4:e2012031.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  4. Piperaki ET, Daikos GL. Malaria in Europe: emerging threat or minor nuisance? Clin Microbiol Infect. 2016;487:493.Google Scholar
  5. Sinka ME, Bangs MJ, Manguin S, Coetzee M, Mbogo CM, Hemingway J, et al. The dominant Anopheles vectors of human malaria in Africa, Europe and the Middle East: occurrence data, distribution maps and bionomic précis. Parasit Vectors. 2010;3:117.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  6. Caminade C, Kovats S, Rocklov J, Tompkins AM, Morse AP, Colón-González FJ, et al. Impact of climate change on global malaria distribution. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2014;3286:3291.Google Scholar
  7. IPCC. Climate Change 2013: The Physical Science Basis. Contribution of Working Group I to the Fifth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. In: Stocker TF, Qin D, Plattner G-K, Tignor M, Allen SK, Boschung J, et al., editors. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 2013; p. 1535.Google Scholar
  8. Medlock JM, Leach SA. Effect of climate change on vector-borne disease risk in the UK. Lancet Infect Dis. 2015:15:721–30.Google Scholar
  9. Schröder W, Schmidt G. Spatial modelling of the potential temperature-dependent transmission of vector-associated diseases in the face of climate change: main results and recommendations from a pilot study in Lower Saxony (Germany). Parasitol Res. 2008;103:55.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  10. Maraun D, Wetterhall F, Ireson AM, Chandler RE, Kendon EJ, Widmann M, et al. Precipitation downscaling under climate change: recent developments to bridge the gap between dynamical models and the end user. Rev Geophys. 2010;48:1–38.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  11. Gutiérrez JM, Maraun D, Widmann M, Huth R, Hertig E, Benestad R, et al. An intercomparison of a large ensemble of statistical downscaling methods over Europe: results from the VALUE perfect predictor cross-validation experiment. Int J Climatol. 2018. https://doi.org/10.1002/joc.5462.
  12. Kuhn KG, Campbell-Lendrum DH, Davies CR. A continental risk map for malaria mosquito (Diptera: Culicidae) vectors in Europe. J Med Entomol. 2002;621:630.Google Scholar
  13. Sinka ME, Rubio-Palis Y, Manguin S, Patil AP, Temperley WH, Gething PW, et al. The dominant Anopheles vectors of human malaria in the Americas: occurrence data, distribution maps and bionomic précis. Parasit Vectors. 2010;3:72.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  14. Elith J, Leathwick JR, Hastie T. A working guide to boosted regression trees. J Anim Ecol. 2008;802:813.Google Scholar
  15. Kiszewski A, Mellinger A, Spielman A, Malaney P, Sachs SE, Sachs J. A global index representing the stability of malaria transmission. Am J Trop Med Hyg. 2004;486:498.Google Scholar
  16. Haylock MR, Hofstra N, Klein Tank AMG, Klok EJ, Jones PD, New M. A European daily high resolution gridded data set of surface temperature and precipitation for 1950–2006. J Geophys Res. 2008;113:D20119.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  17. Jacob D, Petersen J, Eggert B, Alias A, Christensen OB, Bouwer LM, et al. EURO-CORDEX: new high resolution climate change projections for European impact research. Reg Environ Change. 2014;563:578.Google Scholar
  18. Kotlarski S, Keuler K, Christensen OB, Colette A, Déqué M, Gobiet A, et al. Regional climate modeling on European scales: a joint standard evaluation of the EURO-CORDEX RCM ensemble. Geosci Model Dev. 2014;1297:1333.Google Scholar
  19. Van Vuuren DP, Edmonds J, Kainuma M, Riahi K, Thomson A, Hibbard K, et al. The representative concentration pathways: an overview. Clim Change. 2011;5:31.Google Scholar
  20. Bontemps S, Defourny P, Bogaert EV, Arino O, Kalogirou V, Perez JR. GLOBCOVER 2009 - Products description and validation report. Louvain: UCLouvain & ESA Team; 2011.Google Scholar
  21. Gudmundsson L, Bremnes JB, Haugen JE, Engen-Skaugen T. Downscaling RCM precipitation to the station scale using statistical transformations - a comparison of methods. Hydrol Earth Syst. Sci. 2012;3383:3390.Google Scholar
  22. Hastie T, Tibshirani R, Friedman J. The elements of statistical learning: data mining, inference, and prediction. 2nd ed. New York: Springer Series in Statistics; 2009.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  23. Thuiller W, Lafourcade B, Engler R, Araújo MB. BIOMOD - a platform for ensemble forecasting of species distributions. Ecography. 2009;369:373.Google Scholar
  24. Barbet-Massin M, Jiguet F, Albert CH, Thuiller W. Selecting pseudo-absences for species distribution models: how, where and how many? Methods Ecol Evol. 2012;327:338.Google Scholar
  25. Fielding AH, Bell JF. A review of methods for the assessment of prediction errors in conservation presence/absence models. Environ Conserv. 1997;38:49.Google Scholar
  26. Breiman L. Random forests. Machine Learning. 2001;5:32.Google Scholar
  27. Rogers DJ. Models for vectors and vector-borne diseases. Adv Parasitol. 2006;1:35.Google Scholar
  28. Becker N, Petrić D, Boase C, Lane J, Zgomba M, Dahl C, et al. Mosquitoes and their control. Vol. 2. New York: Springer; 2003.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  29. Saliternik Z, World Health Organization. Historical notes on the bionomics and distribution of malaria vectors in Israel (No. WHO/MAL/74.830). Geneva: World Health Organization; 1974.Google Scholar
  30. Patz JA, Daszak P, Tabor GM, Aguirre AA, Pearl M, Epstein J, et al. Unhealthy landscapes: policy recommendations on land use change and infectious disease emergence. Environ Health Perspect. 2004;112:1092–8.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  31. Shapiro LL, Whitehead SA, Thomas MB. Quantifying the effects of temperature on mosquito and parasite traits that determine the transmission potential of human malaria. PLoS Biology. 2017;15:e2003489.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  32. Paaijmans KP, Read AF, Thomas MB. Understanding the link between malaria risk and climate. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2009;13844:13849.Google Scholar
  33. Hertig E, Maraun D, Bartholy J, Pongracz R, Vrac M, Mares I, et al. Validation of extremes from the Perfect-Predictor Experiment of the COST Action VALUE. Int J Climatol. 2018. https://doi.org/10.1002/joc.5469.
  34. Tatem AJ, Jia P, Ordanovich D, Falkner M, Huang Z, Howes R, et al. The geography of imported malaria to non-endemic countries: a meta-analysis of nationally reported statistics. Lancet Infect Dis. 2017;98:107.Google Scholar
  35. Schaffner F, Thiéry I, Kaufmann C, Zettor A, Lengeler C, Mathis A, et al. Anopheles plumbeus (Diptera: Culicidae) in Europe: a mere nuisance mosquito or potential malaria vector? Malar J. 2012;11:393.View ArticleGoogle Scholar

Copyright

© The Author(s). 2019

Comments

By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate. Please note that comments may be removed without notice if they are flagged by another user or do not comply with our community guidelines.

Advertisement

Parasites & Vectors

ISSN: 1756-3305

Contact us