Skip to main content

Advertisement

We're creating a new version of this page. See preview

  • Short report
  • Open Access

A previously unreported potential malaria vector in a dry ecology of Kenya

Parasites & Vectors201912:80

https://doi.org/10.1186/s13071-019-3332-z

  • Received: 18 October 2018
  • Accepted: 31 January 2019
  • Published:

Abstract

Background

In Kenya, malaria remains a major public health menace equally affecting the semi-arid to arid ecologies. However, entomologic knowledge of malaria vectors in such areas remains poor.

Methods

Morphologically-identified wild-caught Anopheles funestus (s.l.) specimens trapped outdoors from the semi-arid to arid area of Kacheliba, West Pokot County, Kenya, were analysed by PCR and sequencing for species identification, malaria parasite infection and host blood-meal sources.

Results

Three hundred and thirty specimens were analysed to identify sibling species of the An. funestus group, none of which amplified using the available primers; two were infected with Plasmodium falciparum and Plasmodium ovale, separately, while 84% (n = 25) of the blood-fed specimens had fed on humans. Mitochondrial cytochrome c oxidase subunit 1 (cox1) and nuclear ribosomal internal transcribed spacer 2 (ITS2) sequences of 55 specimens (Plasmodium-positive, blood-fed and Plasmodium-negative) did not match reference sequences, possibly suggesting a previously unreported species, resolving as two clades.

Conclusions

Our findings indicate the existence of yet-to-be identified and described anopheline species with a potential as malaria vectors in Kenya.

Keywords

  • Anopheles funestus group
  • Malaria transmission
  • Entomological surveillance
  • Molecular approaches
  • Dry ecology
  • Kenya

Background

Entomological surveillance remains integral to effective intervention strategies towards malaria elimination. Previous studies have highlighted the importance of applying molecular approaches including sequencing in malaria entomologic surveillance, particularly involving species among known vector complexes as in the Anopheles funestus group [13]. This way, the identity and distribution of the species including their bionomic roles in malaria transmission can be accurately and comprehensively determined to guide appropriate measures in their control [3].

Anopheles funestus mosquitoes have been previously reported in semi-arid to arid areas of Kenya [4, 5]; however, these studies were not supported by molecular data. While An. funestus (s.s.) is the most ubiquitous species in the An. funestus group, our recent findings uncovered a higher number of sibling species including potential novel vectors not previously described in Kenya [3], including locality-specific occurrence. The findings are indicative of a poor knowledge of the full profile of sibling species in the group. Moreover, in many previous studies employing molecular methods to identify species within the group, a substantial proportion of specimens remain largely unidentified [3, 6, 7]. The aim of the present study was to explore the contribution of An. funestus mosquitoes to malaria parasite transmission in West Pokot County of Kenya, as part of disease monitoring. Malaria is prevalent in this semi-arid to arid ecology of Kenya [8], yet entomological knowledge of malaria vectors inhabiting such area remains poor.

Methods

Mosquito sampling

Adult females morphologically identified An. funestus (sensu lato) [9], collected as part of an arboviral disease monitoring project in Kacheliba (1°29'81"N, 35°01'80"E), West Pokot County (close to Uganda), were used in this study. The samples were collected outdoors in May 2016 using CO2-baited BG Sentinel traps (note: indoor collections using aspiration yielded none of this species). The weather in this area is hot and dry most of the year, with annual temperatures averaging about 21 °C. Rainfall is usually scarce and irregular from one year to the next with annual mean values ranging from about 300 to 400 mm. The mean daily rainfall during the sampling period in May 2016 was 5.55 mm. The main human activity in the area is nomadic pastoralism [5]. The common livestock in the area include cattle, goats and sheep.

DNA extraction and identification of sibling species in the Anopheles funestus group

Genomic DNA extracted from individual whole specimens using Qiagen DNeasy Blood and Tissue Kit (Qiagen, Hilden, Germany) was used to identify by PCR the sibling species as well as probing for Plasmodium infection and host blood-meal sources. We identified species of the An. funestus group using an established cocktail of primers [10, 11], as previously described [3]. Briefly, PCRs were conducted on a SimpliAmp Thermal Cycler (Applied Biosystems, Loughborough, UK) in a 15 μl reaction volume containing 0.5 μM each of the primers, 3 μl of 5× Hot Firepol Blend Master Mix Ready to Load (Solis BioDyne, Tartu, Estonia) and 2 μl of DNA template. The cycling parameters were: initial denaturation at 95 °C for 15 min, followed by 30 cycles of denaturation at 95 °C for 30 s, annealing at 46 °C for 30 s and extension at 72 °C for 40 s, and a final extension at 72 °C for 10 min. Size fragments characteristic of each species were scored after separation in agarose gel electrophoresis (1.5%) stained with ethidium bromide against a 100 bp DNA ladder (O’ Gene Ruler, Fermentas, Fisher Scientific, Loughborough, UK).

Detection of Plasmodium malaria parasites

Individual samples were tested for Plasmodium infection by analyzing high resolution melting (HRM) profiles generated from real time-PCR (RT-PCR) products of non-coding mitochondrial sequence (ncMS) [12] and/or amplification of the cytochrome c oxidase subunit 1 (cox1) gene [13] as previously described [3]. Plasmodium falciparum DNA obtained from National Institute for Biological Standards and Control (NIBSC; London, UK) was used as a positive control. Conventional PCR for Plasmodium spp. detection targeting the cox1 gene was carried out in a 15 μl reaction containing 0.5 μM of each primer, 9 μl of PCR water, 3 μl of 5× Hot Firepol® Blend Master Mix (Solis BioDyne) and 2 μl of DNA template. The amplifying conditions were: 95 °C for 15 min, followed by 40 cycles of 95 °C for 30 s, 59 °C for 30 s and 72 °C for 40 s, and a final extension at 72 °C for 10 min. PCR product of all amplicons were purified using ExoSAP-IT (USB Corporation, Cleveland, OH, USA) and outsourced for sequencing (Macrogen, Seoul, South Korea).

We further confirmed the species identity of Plasmodium sporozoite positive mosquito specimens by amplifying and sequencing of ribosomal DNA internal transcribed spacer region 2 (rDNA ITS2) [14] and/or the mitochondrial cox1 gene [15] as described previously [3]. We also amplified and sequenced 28 randomly selected specimens found negative for Plasmodium infection. The amplicons were purified as reported previously and outsourced for bidirectional sequencing (Inqaba Biotech, Pretoria, South Africa).

Blood-meal analyses

PCR targeting the genes cytochrome b (cytb), 16S ribosomal rRNA and cox1 were used to detect blood-meal host sources from the engorged specimen Anopheles by RT-PCR-HRM (Rotor Gene Q thermo cycler; Qiagen) and compared to profiles of known controls (positive: cow, Swiss mouse, pig, goat, chicken and human; negative: DNA from sugar-fed insectary-reared Anopheles gambiae) as described previously [3]. High resolution melting profiles generated were analyzed using HRM analysis tools present in the RGQ software (Qiagen). Vertebrate hosts were determined through comparison of the blood-meal HRM melt profiles to those of the standard reference control species.

Sequence and statistical analyses

Mosquito and Plasmodium sequences were viewed and edited in Chromas, embedded in MEGA v.6 software [16] prior to querying the GenBank using BLASTn. Multiple sequence alignments of the resulting contiguous sequences (mosquito or Plasmodium) were performed using ClustalW in MEGA v.6 with default parameters. For mosquito sequences, maximum likelihood (ML) trees were constructed with nodal support for the different groupings evaluated through 1000 bootstrap replications utilizing the GTR+G and Jukes and Cantor model of sequence evolution for cox1 and ITS fragments, respectively. For ITS, indels were excluded from analysis. We further estimated the percent evolutionary divergence between the species found and reference species, including those of the An. funestus group, in MEGA v.6. The human blood index is expressed as the proportion of blood-feeding on humans of the total number of blood-fed mosquitoes examined.

Results and discussion

We analyzed a total of 330 morphologically-identified An. funestus (s.l.) specimens, none of which amplified using the established ITS2 cocktail primers. Plasmodium infection was detected in two specimens. Analysis of the resultant 162 bp each of the sequenced isolates of the ncMS gene followed by Blastn searches in GenBank showed one of them as having 100% identity to P. falciparum (GenBank: CP017005) and the other with 100% identity to P. ovale (GenBank: AB354571).

Ribosomal ITS2 and mitochondrial cox1 sequences of the two PCR-Plasmodium-positive mosquito specimens could not be matched to reference anopheline sequences or known vector species in GenBank, BOLD or VectorBase databases (Fig. 1), suggesting the existence of a potentially important unreported malaria vector species.
Fig. 1
Fig. 1

Maximum-likelihood tree inferred for mosquito specimens encountered in this study. a ITS2 sequences using a JC model (267–763 bp). b cox1 barcode region using a GTR+G model (615–658 bp). Analysis was performed in MEGA v.6 with bootstrap support values based on 1000 replications shown above nodes. Other reference anopheline species are included for comparison. The scale-bar indicates the number of substitutions per site. Study samples with Plasmodium infection are indicated with red block circles, and those with blood meals from humans or goats are highlighted in green and grey, respectively. Taxon abbreviations denote samples analysed with haplotype sequences corresponding to GenBank accession nos: a ITS2 (540–538 nt; MK043038-MK043040). b cox1 (528–646 nt; MK047664-MK047672)

Sequences of 25 blood-fed mosquito specimens (both ITS2 and cox1) were identical to those found Plasmodium-positive. Interestingly, a higher proportion of the blood-fed samples (21/25) had taken a blood meal from humans with an estimated human blood index of 84% for this previously unreported species. The remainder had fed on goats. Inclusion of sequences from selected Plasmodium-negative specimens in a phylogenetic tree, show that the species resolves as two well supported clades (Fig. 1) although with clade differences in the representation of the samples between the ITS and cox1 genes. The Plasmodium-positive specimens fell into a single clade for ITS and into each of the two clades for cox1 (Fig. 1). Select sequences of the mosquito specimens are available on GenBank: cox1 (528–646 nt; GenBank: MK047664-MK047672) and ITS2 (540–538 nt; GenBank: MK043038-MK043040). The species share 96% identity to the Anopheles sp. AGB-2016 (GenBank: KU948655), reported in Al’Sadah, Yemen. The next most closely related sequences (92% identity) are from other anopheline mosquito species (Fig. 1).

The bionomic traits uncovered for the species found in the present study, being trapped outdoors and with a high proportion feeding on humans, may compromise effective malaria control using the currently used indoor vector control tools, namely insecticide-treated bednets or indoor residual spraying. This species may contribute to stealth transmission and possibly sustenance of malaria in this focus. Our findings highlight the importance of employing molecular methods in entomological surveillance which target more than just the known malaria vectors. Furthermore, daytime activity is suggested for this species given that it was trapped using BG sentinel traps baited with CO2 set from 6:00 h to 18:00 h. A similar exhibition of such diurnal habit has recently been observed for An. funestus in West Africa; however, this was attributed to the scaling-up of universal coverage with long-lasting insecticidal nets [17]. Such a behaviour pattern could contribute to an increased risk of residual outdoor transmission, clearly representing a challenge for malaria control.

The specimens were morphologically identified as An. funestus (s.l.), although analysis via a molecular approach showed much divergence from sibling species in the group which are known to occur in Kenya. This finding, in part, highlights a taxonomic challenge in accurately identifying species morphologically [18]. Support against molecular evidence for mosquito species delineation has been highlighted [19] on account of sequence variation among individuals of the same species. However, molecular analysis has been highly instrumental in uncovering divergence among morphologically indistinguishable cryptic species [3, 20]. In fact, the DNA barcode targeting the cox1 gene has been widely used for mosquito species identification including discrimination for cryptic species groups, in conjunction with the ITS2 region [21]. Based on the barcode region, previous studies have suggested an evolutionary divergence of 2–3% as a threshold for intraspecific variation [2225]. The average evolutionary divergence over sequence pairs between the putative species and any other species ranged from 0.5 to 15.1% for the cox1 sequence (Table 1). Observed levels of evolutionary divergence between this species and those in the Funestus group including other well-known malaria vectors in Kenya (An. gambiae, An. arabiensis, An. coustani [26]), surpasses this threshold, suggesting a separate genetic entity. Nonetheless, both morphological and molecular identification are useful for a detailed taxonomic elucidation of a given species important for vector surveillance and biodiversity studies [1, 27]. As such, further morphological descriptions and ecological studies of this species are warranted. It may also be important to link the molecular forms to iso-female lines that can be used to provide information on genetic variation within families. Our detection of Plasmodium infection in the newly-detected Anopheles species potentially implicates it in malaria transmission. However, whether the parasite would have been transmitted or not cannot be conclusively answered based on our analysis but its potential role as secondary vector in the more arid areas of Kenya should be further investigated. Confirming its role as a vector may benefit from additional studies to detect human Plasmodium sporozoites through dissection of the salivary glands.
Table 1

Estimates of average evolutionary divergence (%) over sequence pairs for the cox1 gene between the observed species and other reference species

Specimen

KC45

KD58

KF117

K208

K188

An. rivulorum KR014839

An. sp KU948655

An. longipalpis KR014848

An. funestus KU187105

An. coustani KJ522831

An. gambiae KU380446

An. arabiensis KY670610

Anopheles sp. KJ522842

An. parensis JQ424733

KC45

              

KD58

5.1

             

KF117

4.8

1.9

            

K208

5.0

2.1

1.3

           

K188

4.5

1.1

0.8

1.1

          

An. rivulorum KR014839

9.3

9.5

9.5

9.5

9.0

         

Anopheles sp. KU948655

2.6

3.7

3.7

4.0

3.4

9.0

        

An. longipalpis KR014848

7.4

9.3

9.8

10.1

9.5

11.6

6.6

       

An. funestus KU187105

6.9

8.7

9.3

9.5

9.0

10.6

6.6

1.1

      

An. coustani KJ522831

9.8

9.8

10.6

10.8

10.3

11.4

8.7

7.9

8.5

     

An. gambiae KU380446

13.2

14.0

14.8

15.1

14.3

11.6

12.4

10.1

10.1

8.5

    

An. arabiensis KY670610

13.2

14.0

14.8

15.1

14.3

11.6

12.4

10.1

10.1

8.5

0

   

Anopheles sp. KJ522842

10.1

10.3

10.6

11.1

10.3

10.1

9.8

9.8

9.3

9.5

10.0

10.1

  

An. parensis JQ424733

7.9

9.3

9.8

10.1

9.5

10.6

7.1

1.1

1.6

6.9

9.0

9.0

8.7

 

An. vaneedeni JQ424786

7.9

8.7

9.8

10.1

9.0

10.3

7.7

1.6

1.6

7.4

9.3

9.3

8.5

0.5

Taxon abbreviations follow those provided in Fig. 1 with GenBank accession nos MK047664-MK047672; Anopheles sp. KU948655 and Anopheles sp. KJ522842 represent an undescribed Anopheles species reported in in Al’Sadah, Yemen and western Kenya, respectively

Anopheles funestus has been known to have the widest distribution range among the Funestus group [28]. Its lack of detection including other previously reported species in the group from this drought-prone ecology is intriguing. Rainfall in this semi-arid to arid area of northern Kenya is often scarce and irregular from one year to the next [29]. Previous findings have suggested that An. funestus can inhabit extreme dry conditions in the Sahel depending on the availability of suitable breeding sites such as man-made irrigation zones [30, 31]. On the other hand, the influence of prolonged severe drought on population decline and elimination of An. funestus from parts of Africa has been reported [32], suggesting that extreme climate variability can affect the survival of this species. The close relatedness of the species encountered in this study to that from the Arabian Peninsula raises the possibility of adaptation of this and related species to very dry ecologies. While it may be inconclusive as to whether An. funestus and other known sibling species occur in Kacheliba given the limited duration of sampling, further studies over a longer period are encouraged to investigate the species composition and adaptation of mosquitoes in the Funestus group in this ecology.

Conclusions

We have uncovered a species with potential as a malaria vector supported by sequence data and the exhibition of important bionomic traits such as the ability to feed on humans and that it was found infected with Plasmodium malaria parasites. The findings indicate the existence of yet-to-be identified and described anopheline species with potential as a malaria vector in the dry ecology of Kenya. More detailed studies including taxonomic description of the species and its ecological dynamics should be a focus of additional research.

Abbreviations

CDC: 

Centers for Disease Control and Prevention

cox1: 

Cytochrome c oxidase subunit 1

HRM: 

High resolution melting

PCR: 

Polymerase chain reaction

s.l.

Sensu lato

s.s.

Sensu stricto

Declarations

Acknowledgements

We thank the community members in Kacheliba for providing access to their homesteads.

Funding

The study was funded by a grant from the Foundation for the National Institutes of Health through the Vector-Based Transmission of Control: Discovery Research (VCTR) programme of the Grand Challenges in Global Health initiative. Additionally, we gratefully acknowledge the financial support for this research by the following organizations and agencies: UK Department for International Development (DFID), Swedish International Development Cooperation Agency (Sida), Swiss Agency for Development and Cooperation (SDC), and the Kenyan Government. The views expressed herein do not necessarily reflect the official opinion of the donors.

Availability of data and materials

Data supporting the conclusions of this article are included within the article. The datasets used and/or analyzed during the present study can be made available by the corresponding author upon reasonable request. Select sequences of the mosquito specimens were submitted to the GenBank database: cox1 (528–646 nt; MK047664-MK047672); ITS2 (540–538 nt; MK043038-MK043040).

Authors’ contributions

DPT conceived the experiments. EC and RS performed sample collection and morphological identification. EOO and DPT conducted the experiments and analysed the results. DPT wrote the draft manuscript. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Ethics approval and consent to participate

Approval for mosquito trapping in households was sought from the Scientific and Ethical Review Unit (SERU), of the Kenya Medical Research Institute (protocol number KEMRI-SERU 2787). We also sought informed consent from village elders and household heads.

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.

Authors’ Affiliations

(1)
International Centre of Insect Physiology and Ecology (icipe), P.O. Box 30772-00100, Nairobi, Kenya

References

  1. Lobo NF, Laurent BS, Sikaala CH, Hamainza B, Chanda J, Chinula D, et al. Unexpected diversity of Anopheles species in eastern Zambia: implications for evaluating vector behavior and interventions using molecular tools. Sci Rep. 2015;5:17952.Google Scholar
  2. Laurent BS, Cooke M, Krishnankutty SM, Asih P, Mueller JD, Kahindi S, et al. Molecular characterization reveals diverse and unknown malaria vectors in the western Kenyan highlands. Am J Trop Med Hyg. 2016;94:327–35.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  3. Ogola EO, Fillinger U, Ondiba IM, Villinger J, Masiga DK, Torto B, et al. Insights into malaria transmission among Anopheles funestus mosquitoes, Kenya. Parasit Vectors. 2018;11:577.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  4. Mala AO, Irungu LW, Shililu JI, Muturi EJ, Mbogo CM, Njagi JK, et al. Plasmodium falciparum transmission and aridity: a Kenyan experience from the dry lands of Baringo and its implications for Anopheles arabiensis control. Malar J. 2011;10:121.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  5. Chepkorir E, Venter M, Lutomiah J, Mulwa F, Arum S, Tchouassi D, et al. The occurrence, diversity and blood feeding patterns of potential vectors of dengue and yellow fever in Kacheliba, West Pokot County, Kenya. Acta Trop. 2018;186:50–7.Google Scholar
  6. Kaindoa EW, Matowo NS, Ngowo HS, Mkandawile G, Mmbando A, Finda M, et al. Interventions that effectively target Anopheles funestus mosquitoes could significantly improve control of persistent malaria transmission in south-eastern Tanzania. PLoS One. 2017;12:e0177807.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  7. Kiuru CW, Oyieke FA, Mukabana WR, Mwangangi J, Kamau L, Muhia-Matoke D. Status of insecticide resistance in malaria vectors in Kwale County, coastal Kenya. Malar J. 2018;17:3.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  8. Mutero C, Mutinga M, Ngindu A, Kenya P, Amimo F. Visceral leishmaniasis and malaria prevalence in West Pokot District, Kenya. East Afr Med J. 1992;69:3–8.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. Gillies M, Coetzee M. A supplement to the Anophelinae of Africa south of the Sahara (Afrotropical region). Johannesburg: The South African Institute for Medical Research; 1987.Google Scholar
  10. Koekemoer L, Kamau L, Hunt R, Coetzee M. A cocktail polymerase chain reaction assay to identify members of the Anopheles funestus (Diptera: Culicidae) group. Am J Trop Med Hyg. 2002;66:804–11.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  11. Cohuet A, Simard F, Toto J, Kengne P, Coetzee M, Fontenille D. Species identification within the Anopheles funestus group of malaria vectors in Cameroon and evidence for a new species. Am J Trop Med Hyg. 2003;69:200–5.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  12. Chaumeau V, Andolina C, Fustec B, Ndam NT, Brengues C, Herder S, et al. Comparison of the performances of five primer sets for the detection and quantification of Plasmodium in anopheline vectors by real-time PCR. PLoS One. 2016;11:e0159160.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  13. Echeverry DF, Deason NA, Makuru V, Davidson J, Xiao H, Niedbalski J, et al. Fast and robust single PCR for Plasmodium sporozoite detection in mosquitoes using the cytochrome oxidase I gene. Malar J. 2017;16:230.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  14. Beebe NW, Saul A. Discrimination of all members of the Anopheles punctulatus complex by polymerase chain reaction-restriction fragment length polymorphism analysis. Am J Trop Med Hyg. 1995;53:478–81.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  15. Folmer O, Black M, Hoeh W, Lutz R, Vrijenhoek R. DNA primers for amplification of mitochondrial cytochrome c oxidase subunit I from diverse metazoan invertebrates. Mol Marine Biol Biotechnol. 1994;3:294–9.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. Tamura K, Stecher G, Peterson D, Filipski A, Kumar S. MEGA6: Molecular Evolutionary Genetics Analysis version 6.0. Mol Biol Evol. 2013;30:2725–9.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  17. Sougoufara S, Diédhiou SM, Doucouré S, Diagne N, Sembène PM, Harry M, et al. Biting by Anopheles funestus in broad daylight after use of long-lasting insecticidal nets: a new challenge to malaria elimination. Malar J. 2014;13:125.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  18. Harbach R. The classification of genus Anopheles (Diptera: Culicidae): a working hypothesis of phylogenetic relationships. Bull Entomol Res. 2004;94:537–53.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  19. Erlank E, Koekemoer LL, Coetzee M. The importance of morphological identification of African anopheline mosquitoes (Diptera: Culicidae) for malaria control programmes. Malar J. 2018;17:43.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  20. Burke A, Dandalo L, Munhenga G, Dahan-Moss Y, Mbokazi F, Ngxongo S, et al. A new malaria vector mosquito in South Africa. Sci Rep. 2017;7:43779.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  21. Beebe NW. DNA barcoding mosquitoes: advice for potential prospectors. Parasitology. 2018;145:622–33.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  22. Hebert PD, Cywinska A, Ball SL. Biological identifications through DNA barcodes. Proc R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 2003;270:313–21.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  23. Meyer CP, Paulay G. DNA barcoding: error rates based on comprehensive sampling. PLoS Biol. 2005;3:e422.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  24. Cywinska A, Hunter F, Hebert PD. Identifying Canadian mosquito species through DNA barcodes. Med Vet Entomol. 2006;20:413–24.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  25. Tchouassi DP, Bastos AD, Sole CL, Diallo M, Lutomiah J, Mutisya J, et al. Population genetics of two key mosquito vectors of Rift Valley fever virus reveals new insights into the changing disease outbreak patterns in Kenya. PLoS Negl Trop Dis. 2014;8:e3364.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  26. Mwangangi JM, Muturi EJ, Muriu SM, Nzovu J, Midega JT, Mbogo C. The role of Anopheles arabiensis and Anopheles coustani in indoor and outdoor malaria transmission in Taveta District, Kenya. Parasit Vectors. 2013;6:114.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  27. Teletchea F. After 7 years and 1000 citations: comparative assessment of the DNA barcoding and the DNA taxonomy proposals for taxonomists and non-taxonomists. Mitochondrial DNA. 2010;21:206–26.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  28. Dia I, Guelbeogo MW, Ayala D. Advances and perspectives in the study of the malaria mosquito Anopheles funestus. In: Manguin S, editor. Anopheles Mosquitoes. New Insights into Malaria Vectors. London: Intech; 2013. p. 828.Google Scholar
  29. MoALF. Climate risk profile for West Pokot. Kenya County Climate Risk Profile Series. Nairobi: The Kenya Ministry of Agriculture, Livestock and Fisheries (MoALF); 2016. p. 21.Google Scholar
  30. Konate L, Diop A, Sy N, Faye M, Deng Y, Izri A, et al. Comeback of Anopheles funestus in Sahelian Senegal. Lancet. 2001;358:336.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  31. Labbo R, Fouta A, Jeanne I, Ousmane I, Duchemin J. Anopheles funestus in Sahel: new evidence from Niger. Lancet. 2004;363:660.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  32. Mouchet J, Faye O, Julvez J, Manguin S. Drought and malaria retreat in the Sahel West Africa. Lancet. 1996;348:1735–6.View ArticleGoogle Scholar

Copyright

© The Author(s). 2019

Comments

By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate. Please note that comments may be removed without notice if they are flagged by another user or do not comply with our community guidelines.

Advertisement