Skip to main content
Download PDF

Molecular characterization and distribution of Schistosoma cercariae collected from naturally infected bulinid snails in northern and central Côte d’Ivoire

Parasites & Vectors volume 12, Article number: 117 (2019) Cite this article

Abstract

Background

Accurate identification of schistosome species infecting intermediate host snails is important for understanding parasite transmission, schistosomiasis control and elimination. Cercariae emerging from infected snails cannot be precisely identified morphologically to the species level. We used molecular tools to clarify the distribution of the Schistosoma haematobium group species infecting bulinid snails in a large part of Côte d’Ivoire and confirmed the presence of interspecific hybrid schistosomes.

Methods

Between June 2016 and March 2017, Bulinus snails were sampled in 164 human-water contact sites from 22 villages of the northern and central parts of Côte d’Ivoire. Multi-locus genetic analysis (mitochondrial cox1 and nuclear ITS) was performed on individual schistosome cercariae shed from snails, in the morning and in the afternoon, for species and hybrid identification.

Results

Overall, 1923 Bulinus truncatus, 255 Bulinus globosus and 1424 Bulinus forskalii were obtained. Among 2417 Bulinus screened, 25 specimens (18 B. truncatus and seven B. globosus) shed schistosomes, with up to 14% infection prevalence per site and time point. Globally, infection rates per time point ranged between 0.6 and 4%. Schistosoma bovis, S. haematobium and S. bovis × S. haematobium hybrids infected 0.5%, 0.2% and 0.4% of the snails screened, respectively. Schistosoma bovis and hybrids were more prevalent in B. truncatus, whereas S. haematobium and hybrid infections were more prevalent in B. globosus. Schistosoma bovis-infected Bulinus were predominantly found in northern sites, while S. haematobium and hybrid infected snails were mainly found in central parts of Côte d’Ivoire.

Conclusions

The data highlight the necessity of using molecular tools to identify and understand which schistosome species are transmitted by specific intermediate host snails. The study deepens our understanding of the epidemiology and transmission dynamics of S. haematobium and S. bovis in Côte d’Ivoire and provides the first conclusive evidence for the transmission of S. haematobium × S. bovis hybrids in this West African country.

Trial registration ISRCTN, ISRCTN10926858. Registered 21 December 2016; retrospectively registered (see: http://www.isrctn.com/ISRCTN10926858)

Background

Schistosomiasis, caused by dioecious digeneans of the genus Schistosoma, is a parasitic disease of considerable medical (~206.4 million people requiring treatment) and veterinary importance throughout tropical and subtropical regions [1]. There are 25 recognised Schistosoma species all of which have a two-host life-cycle with asexual reproduction occurring in a specific freshwater or amphibious snail and a sexual stage within the blood vessels of the definitive mammalian host [2]. Eggs are voided in the urine (Schistosoma haematobium) or faeces (most other species) of the infected definitive host. The separate sexes of the adult schistosomes enable interactions between male and female worms within their definitive hosts, while the asexual reproduction within the intermediate host snail gives rise to clonal larvae (cercariae) facilitating exposure and potential infection of definitive mammalian hosts that are in contact with the water [3, 4].

As obligate intermediate hosts, freshwater or amphibious snails constitute a crucial component for the transmission of Schistosoma species [5], with different snail species involved in the transmission of specific schistosome species or species groups. Different levels of snail-schistosome compatibility have been reported, depending on the species involved and this can be further complicated by geographical variation of both the snails and their schistosomes [5, 6]. Clarifying the interplay between these organisms, at a local/fine scale level, is not only vital for our understanding and monitoring of schistosome transmission but also for the application of snail control interventions to support schistosomiasis control and elimination [7,8,9].

Snail species of the genus Bulinus act as intermediate hosts for several schistosome species that belong to the S. haematobium species group in Africa and the Middle East [5, 6, 10, 11]. More precisely, Bulinus truncatus and Bulinus globosus have been shown to transmit both S. haematobium and S. bovis, which are responsible for human urogenital and livestock intestinal schistosomiasis, respectively. Additionally, Bulinus forskalii is an intermediate host for both S. bovis and the human rectal schistosomes Schistosoma intercalatum and Schistosoma guineensis [12]. Sympatric distribution of these snails occurs in many geographical and ecological settings resulting in co-endemic areas for multiple schistosome species [5, 13]. Moreover, the epidemiology of these schistosome species and their snail-schistosome relationships has been further complicated by interspecific hybridization between closely related schistosome species, such as S. haematobium and S. bovis, with hybridization now recognised to be commonly occurring in West Africa [14,15,16]. Hybrids can be identified using molecular techniques, which help to elucidate the epidemiology and potential impact on human and animal schistosomiasis. Worryingly, laboratory-bred hybrid schistosomes have been shown to exhibit vigour in terms of infectivity, fecundity, host (mammalian and snail) range and compatibility [14, 17, 18]. Moreover, Moné et al. [19] showed that the schistosomes responsible for the urogenital schistosomiasis outbreak in Corsica (Europe) were not just S. haematobium but also S. haematobium × S. bovis hybrids, with symptomatic and asymptomatic infections diagnosed in tourists. Along with the potential zoonotic transmission of livestock schistosomes, this issue could severely hamper control and elimination efforts. Cercariae emerging from infected snails cannot be precisely identified morphologically to the species level or as hybrids, and hence, molecular tools are required to characterize which species of snail is shedding which species or hybrid schistosome in different areas. Without such data, cercariae can be misidentified leading to incorrect epidemiological and transmission data [20].

In Côte d’Ivoire, it has been reported that S. haematobium is mainly transmitted by B. truncatus in the northern part of the country, while in central Côte d’Ivoire, both B. truncatus and B. globosus are involved in transmission [21,22,23,24]. In addition, the presence of S. bovis in northern Côte d’Ivoire has been highlighted with transmission involving three different snail species; B. truncatus, B. globosus and B. forskalii [23]. However, as there is migration of livestock from the north to the south [25] the occurrence of S. bovis is also expected in the central part of the country. Northern and central regions of Côte d’Ivoire are characterised by many small man-made dams built for crop irrigation, livestock watering and the development of sedentary cattle breeding [23, 26, 27]. The transmission of natural hybrids between S. bovis and Schistosoma curassoni (another cattle schistosome) has also been suggested to occur in Côte d’Ivoire [23] with evidence, based on cercarial behaviour, needing clarification with molecular methods.

Here we employed molecular tools to investigate the distribution and epidemiology of S. haematobium group species infecting Bulinus intermediate host snails in Côte d’Ivoire. Malacological surveys were conducted as part of a Schistosomiasis Consortium for Operational Research and Evaluation (SCORE) project, investigating the seasonal transmission of S. haematobium in a seasonal transmission setting in the northern and central parts of Côte d’Ivoire [28]. Schistosome cercariae, from infected Bulinus snails, were characterized using standard mitochondrial (cox1) and nuclear (ITS) genetic markers to determine species, and also to identify any inter-species interactions such as those observed in other West African countries [2]. The data are discussed in relation to (i) the distribution, abundance and seasonal changes of infected snails; (ii) the epidemiology of S. haematobium group species in Côte d’Ivoire, the host (Bulinus)-schistosome relationships and how this correlates to geography and season; and (iii) the complexities for the monitoring of human schistosomiasis transmission.

Methods

Study area

As part of the SCORE project [28] in Côte d’Ivoire this study was carried out in the northern (regions of Tchologo and Bounkani) and central (regions of Hambol, Gkêkê and Bélier) areas that are endemic for schistosomiasis. Within these regions there are two distinct seasons; rainfall usually occurs between May and September with the remaining months being dry. There is a strong seasonal link between the presence of snails and the transmission of S. haematobium with infected snails generally found during the dry season (January and February) in man-made stagnant freshwater bodies [23]. As shown in Fig. 1, a total of 22 villages were surveyed; half of them in the north (Bouko, Dékokaha, Djémitédouo, Gogo, Korokara, Mambiadougou, Noumousso, Sambakaha, Torla, Tougbo and Vonkorô) and the other half in the central part of Côte d’Ivoire (Allokokro, Allomabo, Assèkro, Fitabro, Foro-Foro, Kongobo, Linguebo, N’Zuéda, Raviart, Sakri-Konansuikro and Taki-Salèkro).

Fig. 1
figure 1

Map of Côte d’Ivoire showing the location of the 22 villages that were included in the study together with the distribution and proportions of the different Bulinus species found at the different survey sites where schistosome transmission was detected and the proportion of the different schistosomes being transmitted at the seven positive sites. The names of the villages are indicated in black font and names of regions are in grey. Data are merged for all three surveys conducted between June 2016-March 2017

Full size image

Snail surveys

In each study village, human-water contact sites were identified during a baseline malacological survey carried out in November 2015. Sites were georeferenced using a hand-held global positioning system (GPS; Garmin Sery GPS MAP 62, Olathe, KS, USA) device [28]. A total of 164 human-water contact sites were identified that were associated with dammed and natural lakes, irrigation canals (classified as main and secondary canals), rivulets and ponds (Additional file 1: Table S1). Snail surveys were carried out at each human-water contact site at three time points: June 2016, November-December 2016 and March 2017.

During each sampling session, snails were collected from each site by the same two investigators, using a long-handled scoop and/or forceps for a period of 15 min [13, 29, 30]. Snails were placed between two layers of moistened cotton in a Petri dish, labelled and transferred alive to a nearby laboratory. Snails were counted and morphologically identified using standard identification keys [5, 31]. Bulinid snails, specifically B. truncatus and B. globosus, were screened for infection by a standard cercarial emergence test. Additionally, B. forskalii were collected and recorded but, due to a high mortality rate post-capture, only those from the March 2017 surveys were screened for infection. All other snails were preserved in ethanol directly after collection.

Testing snails for schistosome infections

Snails were kept in the laboratory, in batches of 15 individuals according to the sites where they were sampled, in transparent plastic tanks containing well water. Snails were maintained at a water temperature of 23–24 °C with a 12:12 hour photoperiod, and fed ad libitum with boiled lettuce and fish food. Water was changed at least twice per week. Snails were monitored for schistosome infection and survival/mortality using standard methods. Snails were checked for cercarial shedding on arrival and subsequently every other day over a period of one month. Cercarial shedding was stimulated by exposure of individual snails to artificial light at two time periods: between 10:00 and 12:00 h (morning) and between 13:00 and 15:00 h (afternoon). They were observed at two time periods to consider the different chronobiological/circadian rhythm of human (cercarial shedding more likely between 10:00–12:00 h) and livestock schistosomes (cercarial shedding more likely between 13.00–15.00 h) [32]. Snails were switched to fresh shedding containers between time periods and after the shedding period the containers were checked individually for the presence of cercariae under a binocular microscope [24]. For each snail, infection status (shedding of schistosome cercariae) was recorded, along with information on the site, collection date and whether cercarial shedding was observed in the morning or in the afternoon. Cercariae were morphologically identified as mammalian schistosomes based on keys produced by Frandsen & Christensen [33]. Only snails that shed Schistosoma cercariae were considered for subsequent molecular analyses.

Preservation of schistosome cercariae and snails

Under a binocular microscope, individual cercariae from each snail were captured and pipetted individually onto Whatman FTA® indicator cards (GE Healthcare Life Sciences; Amersham, UK) in a volume of 3 μl. Infected snails were individually preserved in ethanol for molecular identification. Samples were transported to the Natural History Museum, for molecular analyses.

Molecular analysis of cercariae

DNA preparation

Using a Harris Micro-Punch®, a 2 mm disc was removed from the Whatman FTA® indicator cards at the central point of where the sample was preserved. Up to four cercariae were punched from each infected snail and, whenever possible, this included two cercariae shed in the morning and two shed in the afternoon. The FTA punches were put in individual 0.2 ml tubes and the DNA from each cercaria was extracted using the alkaline elution method [34].

Molecular identification of schistosome cercariae

Multi-locus genetic analysis (mitochondrial cox1 and nuclear ITS) was performed on each individual cercaria for species and hybrid identification [15].

Nuclear ITS1 + 2 rDNA amplification

The complete ITS1 + 2 rDNA was amplified from each cercaria in 25 μl reactions containing 3 μl of template DNA, Illustra PuReTaq Ready-To-Go PCR Beads (GE Healthcare), 1 μl (10 pmol) of each forward (ITS2) and reverse (ITS1) primer [15, 35] and the PCR conditions described in Webster et al. [15].

Mitochondrial (mt) cox1 amplification

The diagnostic S. haematobium (S. h.)/S. bovis (S. b.) mtDNA cox1 marker was amplified from individual cercariae in 25 μl reactions containing 3 μl of each DNA sample, 1 μl (10 pmol) of each primer Asmit1 (forward), Sh.R (reverse) and Sb.R (reverse) [35] and the PCR conditions described in Webster et al. [15].

Positive controls of S. haematobium and S. bovis DNA (available from SCAN [36]) and a negative (no template DNA) control were used alongside each set of ITS and cox1 PCRs. Results were visualised by running 4 μl of each reaction on a 2% TAE gel stained with GelRedTM (Biotium Inc, CA, USA).

Sequencing analysis

Positive PCR reactions were purified using QiaQuick PCR Purification Kit (Qiagen Inc., Santa Clarita, CA, USA) according to the manufacturer’s protocol and then Sanger sequenced, using a dilution (1 pmol) of the original PCR primers, on an Applied Biosystems 3730 automated sequencer (Applied Biosystems, Foster City, CA, USA). The sequences were assembled and edited manually using Sequencher version 4.5 (Gene Codes Corp., Ann Arbor, MI, USA). The identity of the cox1 and ITS sequences from the individual cercariae were confirmed by comparison to reference data [15] and also using the Basic Local Alignment Search Tool (BLAST). Cox1 and ITS genetic profiles were assigned to each individual cercaria to confirm species identity. Cox1 sequence data were submitted to the GenBank database.

Snail molecular identification/confirmation

Sample preparation and DNA extraction

All snails found to be shedding schistosome cercariae were subjected to molecular identification to species level. Photographic images were taken of the snail shells before the soft tissue was placed in TE buffer with a pH 7.4 for 1 h in order to remove any remaining ethanol and to rehydrate the tissue. Total genomic DNA was isolated from the head/foot of each snail using DNeasy Blood and Tissue kit (Qiagen Inc., Santa Clarita, CA, USA) according to the manufacturer’s protocol with an overnight digest and the DNA was eluted in a total volume of 200 μl purified water.

Amplification of the partial cox1 mtDNA region

A PCR amplification of a partial cytochrome c oxidase subunit 1 (cox1) sequence was performed on each snail extract using Folmer primers (LCO1490 and HCO2198) [37] with the same PCR conditions as described in Kane et al. [38]. Amplicons were visualised on a 2% TAE GelRed agarose gel; positive reactions were purified and sequenced as described earlier. Snail species were confirmed by comparing the sequence data obtained from each individual to data available on GenBank.

Statistical analyses of snail-schistosome combinations

The numbers of each snail species collected were computed and statistically analysed from each site and per survey date. Snail infection prevalence and corresponding 95% confidence intervals (CIs), based on Clopper-Pearson method [39], were calculated per type of water body for each village, for any schistosome infection and individual species. Different analysis parameters were included: time points, intermediate host snail species, time of cercarial emergence and geographical origin. Statistical analyses were based on multi-sample tests of proportions using the Fisher’s exact test in order to detect any significant differences. Statistical analyses were performed at the 5% significance level using the software STATA version 12.1 (StataCorp.; College Station, TX, USA). Mapping of snail and schistosome species was undertaken in Quantum GIS (QGIS) version 2.41.21 (Essen, Germany) and in R version 3.4.0 [40]. Water body data acquired from the DIVA-GIS database (http://www.diva-gis.org/) and administrative area shape file data from the Global Administrative Areas Database (GADM; https://gadm.org/).

Results

The numbers of snails collected and those positive for schistosome infections at each time point and at each water contact site per village are given in a supplementary file (Additional file 1: Table S1). Snail species identification was based on morphology, except for the infected snails that were identified using molecular methods (Table 1).

Table 1 Molecular identification of each positive Bulinus snail and their schistosome cercariae, collected during the three malacological surveys carried out in the northern and central parts of Côte d’Ivoire
Full size table

Bulinus spp. collections and infection prevalences

A total of 3602 Bulinus snails were collected over the three time points in 92 out of the 164 human-water contact sites visited, with 53.4% B. truncatus, 39.5% B. forskalii and 7.1% B. globosus. Stratified by sampling time point, in June 2016, November-December 2016 and March 2017, the numbers of snails sampled were 1128 (56.2% B. truncatus, 42.5% B. forskalii and 1.3% B. globosus), 847 (61.2% B. forskalii, 22.8% B. globosus and 16.0% B. truncatus) and 1627 (70.9% B. truncatus, 26.2% B. forskalii and 2.9% B. globosus), respectively. A total of 2417 surviving Bulinus snails were screened for infection, among which 1% (18 B. truncatus and 7 B. globosus) were found to be shedding mammalian schistosomes (Table 1). Infection prevalence varied by collection time point with estimates of 0.7% (4 B. truncatus) (95% CI: 0.2–2.0%) in June 2016, 4% (5 B. truncatus and 7 B. globosus) (95% CI: 2.0–7.0%) in November-December 2016 and 0.6% (9 B. truncatus) (95% CI: 0.2–1.1%) in March 2017 (Table 1 and Additional file 1: Table S1). The molecular identification of the infected snails matched the morphological identification made at the time of collection. The geographical distribution and proportions of each of the snail species collected at sites where positive snails were found are shown in Fig. 1. None of the B. forskalii collected in the March 2017 survey shed schistosome cercariae.

Schistosome cercariae identification

Complete genetic profiles (cox1 and ITS) (Table 1) were obtained from schistosome cercariae recovered from each of the 25 infected Bulinus; with good quality genetic profiles obtained from 75 individual cercariae. Cercariae with four different genetic profiles were identified: (i) pure species S. haematobium (S. h. cox1 and S. h. ITS); (ii) pure species S. bovis (S. b. cox1 and S. b. ITS); (iii) hybird S. haematobium × S. bovis (S. h. × S. b.) (S. b. cox1 and S. h. ITS) from now on referred to as hybrid-1; and (iv) hybrid S. bovis × S. haematobium (S. b. × S. h.) (S. h. cox1 and S. h. & S. b. mixed ITS) from now on referred to as hybrid-2 (Table 1). Figure 1 shows the distribution and proportions of the different Schistosoma species and hybrids from the different villages where the positive snails were found. Cox1 sequence data accession numbers are: MK333532-MK333538. Four S. bovis cox1 haplotypes were identified and one S. haematobium cox1 haplotype, which matched the generic mainland (H1) S. haematobium [2]. ITS data matched that previously accessioned FJ588857-FJ588862 [14].

Bulinus-Schistosoma infection dynamics

The species and numbers of infected Bulinus, together with the species of the schistosomes involved in the infection, from each site and at each time point are shown in Table 1.

Of the 25 infected snails analysed, 44% (13 B. truncatus) shed S. bovis, 20% (2 B. truncatus and 3 B. globosus) shed S. haematobium and 36% (5 B. truncatus and 5 B. globosus) shed the hybrids-1 + 2, with no statistical significant difference among these proportions (Fisher’s exact test, P > 0.05); however, S. bovis infections were clearly more abundant and hybrid-1 is more common than hybrid-2. Schistosome proportions also varied significantly according to the Bulinus species involved, with S. bovis and the hybrids (1 + 2) being more prevalent in B. truncatus and S. haematobium and hybrids (1 + 2) being more prevalent in B. globosus (Fisher’s exact test, P < 0.001). Schistosoma bovis was only found infecting B. truncatus and S. haematobium and the hybrids were found infecting B. truncatus and B. globosus. No effect of the seasonal time of collection influenced the proportions of the schistosome species (Fisher’s exact test, P > 0.05); however, infected B. globosus were only found in November-December whereas infected B. truncatus were found at all time points.

Co-infections and cercarial chronobiology

Interestingly, based on our limited number of cercariae analysed, no mixed infections with both pure S. bovis and S. haematobium were observed in any individual snail (Table 1). However, one B. globosus (from Raviart) exhibited a mixed infection with both pure S. haematobium and the S. haematobium × S. bovis hybrid-1, and two B. truncatus [from Djémitédouo (n = 1) and Korokara (n = 1)] were found infected with both pure S. bovis and the S. bovis × S. haematobium hybrid-1.

There was no correlation between the emergence of the different Schistosoma species and the time of shedding with S. haematobium, S. bovis and the S. haematobium × S. bovis hyrbids shedding both in the morning and the afternoon. However, the only 3 snails (1 B. globosus and 2 B. truncatus) that were found to have co-infections (detailed above) exhibited differences in the shedding of their schistosome species and/or hybrids at the different times of day. These co-infections may have been missed if shedding had only been performed at a single time point.

Geographical distribution of the schistosomes identified

Among the 2417 snails tested, 0.52% infected individuals (all B. truncatus) were from northern sites, and 0.48% (7 B. globosus and 5 B. truncatus) were from the central parts of Côte d’Ivoire (Fig. 1). The percentages of snails from the north infected with S. bovis, S. haematobium and the hybrids-1 + 2 were 3.2%, 0.03% and 0.08%, respectively. Likewise, infection rates in intermediate host snails from central sites were 0.6%, 0.7% and 0.9% with S. bovis, S. haematobium and the hybrid-1 + 2, respectively. These proportions varied significantly between the northern and central parts of Côte d’Ivoire (Fisher’s exact test, P < 0.001), with S. bovis-infected Bulinus predominantly found in the northern sites, while S. haematobium and hybrid-1 + 2 infected Bulinus snails were mainly obtained from central parts of the study area (Fig. 1). Infected snails were only found in lake environments, apart from one infected snail from a rivulet site in Raviart.

Discussion

These molecular data from schistosome cercariae from Côte d’Ivoire clearly show the sympatric distribution of S. haematobium and S. bovis causing human urogenital and veterinary intestinal schistosomiasis, respectively, as previously reported [23, 28], and also confirm the presence of S. haematobium × S. bovis hybrids. Both B. globosus and B. truncatus were found infected; B. truncatus was predominately infected with S. bovis while B. globosus (found in two villages in the central regions; Foroforo and Raviart) was only found infected in one village, transmitting S. haematobium and the hybrids. In the northern regions, more snails were found infected with S. bovis than with S. haematobium or hybrids, which is in line with findings from N’Goran [23]. The greater abundance of S. bovis in the north compared with central regions may be due to the different frequencies of humans and cattle in these areas and their potential to contaminate the water bodies through urination or defecation. Particularly in the north, the water contact frequency of animals was observed to be more common compared with the human populations. Indeed, in this part of Côte d’Ivoire, where pastoralism is common, some water bodies had been polluted by livestock, and hence, were not frequented by the local human population. Interestingly, none of the B. forskalii snails collected were found infected. However, due to the high mortality rate of these snails upon capture and transfer to the laboratory, our data are limited to only one of the survey time points (March 2017), and hence, caution is required for interpreting these observations.

Schistosoma haematobium × S. bovis hybrids are now known to be common in other parts of West Africa, including Niger [41, 42], Senegal [14, 15] and Mali [43]. Our data widen the extent of this hybridization to Côte d’Ivoire. N’Goran et al. [44] reported the existence of two ‘ecotypes’, based on morphological observations, of S. haematobium in Côte d’Ivoire: one that was compatible with B. truncatus in the north and the other, which was compatible with B. globosus in the south. It is conceivable that these ‘ecotypes’ may have been mixed populations, including hybrids. Our ability to capture, preserve and molecularly characterize larval schistosomes has enhanced knowledge on the epidemiology of these important schistosome species in several endemic countries, highlighting the complexities of their transmission biology. However, the limitations of the molecular markers used does need to be considered. To gain further insights into these inter-species interactions and hybridisation events, it is necessary to start investigating more genomic regions and indeed when possible whole genomes.

The occurrence of these hybrid schistosomes in Côte d’Ivoire may have been influenced by the sympatric water contact behaviour of their respective definitive hosts [14, 15]. Indeed, in the study villages, there are many man-made lakes formed from dam constructions to facilitate multiple agricultural and husbandry activities [13, 22, 23]. Additionally, more than 80% of the contact sites surveyed here, were identified within these types of man-made multi-purpose lakes that are regularly frequented by both humans (for crop irrigation, fishing, domestic tasks, recreation and water provision) and by livestock (for watering) [26, 27].

In some cases, hybrid schistosomes have been shown to exhibit extended host ranges and, enhanced infectivity and virulence [17, 18]. Consequently, it is important to investigate this hybridisation in relation to human transmission and the introduction or spread of infections, such as that observed in Corsica [19]. Both reciprocal hybrids; S. haematobium (ITS) × S. bovis (cox1) (hybrid-1) and mix S. bovis/S. haematobium (ITS) × S. haematobium (cox1) (hybrid-2) were identified, providing evidence for bidirectional introgressive hybridisation, as also previously reported in Senegal [14, 15]. Additionally, the S. haematobium (ITS) × S. bovis (cox1) hybrids-1 were more abundant in the snails than the reciprocal form, which is a common trend [14]. Historical studies, based on chetotaxy and allozymic markers, have also suggested the occurrence of natural S. bovis × S. curassoni hybrids in northern and central parts of Côte d’Ivoire, which have also been characterized in Niger and Senegal [41, 45]. However, no S. curassoni molecular signal was observed in these data [21] and no Bulinus umbilicatus, the intermediate host snail of S. curassoni was found.

Our data suggest that, although limited due to the small number of cercariae analysed, co-infections within individual snails were only observed when hybrids were involved (S. bovis + hybrid or S. haematobium + hybrid) but not between pure species e.g. S. bovis and S. haematobium. This may be due to either fine-scale specific snail-schistosome compatibilities, an acquired resistance mechanism to a second parasitic infection [46, 47], or interspecific competition between parasite larvae in successful mixed infections [48, 49], all of which hybrids may be able to overcome due to their dual inheritance patterns. Additionally, no difference in the chronobiological emergence of the cercariae was observed between S. bovis, S. haematobium and the hybrids with all three schistosomes shedding in the morning and the afternoon. Additional research is needed to deepen our knowledge of snail resistance, compatibility and susceptibility of these different species and hybrid forms.

Conclusions

Most of the positive snails found within this study were transmitting S. bovis (44%) or S. haematobium × S. bovis hybrids (36%), while far fewer snails were transmitting S. haematobium (20%). The high level of transmission (although focal) of both human urogenital and livestock intestinal schistosomiasis, warrants increased control efforts and surveillance. Our data highlight the necessity to use molecular methods to identify which schistosome species are being transmitted by the different intermediate host snail species in order to refine control and elimination efforts. Our work provides a clearer picture of the focal epidemiology of schistosomiasis and also highlights the possibility of overestimating the level of transmission of human schistosomiasis if animal schistosomes are ignored. Additionally, schistosomes can easily be imported into new areas through the movement of their mammalian hosts, particularly livestock and humans [19, 25, 50]. These factors emphasise the need for accurate cercariae identification during transmission monitoring.

Taken together, we have enhanced knowledge of the epidemiology and transmission dynamics of S. haematobium and S. bovis in a large part of Côte d’Ivoire and also provided the first conclusive evidence for the transmission of S. haematobium × S. bovis hybrids in this West African country. This hybridization is clearly widespread in West Africa and the biological characteristics of hybrids, due to heterosis effects, may have a detrimental impact on human health and schistosomiasis control programmes, warranting further research into these inter-species interactions.

Abbreviations

S. h:

S. haematobium

S. b:

S. bovis

BLAST:

Basic Local Alignment Search Tool

cox1:

Cytochrome c oxidase subunit 1

DNA:

Deoxyribonucleic acid

GPS:

Global positioning system

ITS:

Internal transcribed spacer

PCR:

Polymerase chain reaction

SCAN:

Schistosomiasis Collections at the Natural History Museum

SCORE:

Schistosomiasis Consortium for Operational Research and Evaluation

WHO:

World Health Organization

Hybrid-1:

S. h. × S. b. = S. b. mitochondrial cox1 and nuclear S. h ITS sequence

Hybrid-2:

S. b. × S. h. = S. h. mitochondrial cox1 and mixed S. h. and S. b. nuclear ITS sequence

References

  1. WHO. Schistosomiasis. Fact sheet 2018; https://www.who.int/news-room/fact-sheets/detail/schistosomiasis. Accessed 15 Jan 2019.

  2. Webster BL, Emery AM, Webster JP, Gouvras A, Garba A, Diaw O, et al. Genetic diversity within Schistosoma haematobium: DNA barcoding reveals two distinct groups. PLoS Negl Trop Dis. 2012;6:e1882.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Brant SV, Morgan JA, Mkoji GM, Snyder SD, Rajapakse RPVJ, Loker ES. An approach to revealing blood fluke life cycles, taxonomy, and diversity: provision of key reference data including DNA sequence from single life cycle stages. J Parasitol. 2006;92:77–88.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Colley DG, Bustinduy AL, Secor WE, King CH. Human schistosomiasis. Lancet. 2014;383:2253–64.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Brown DS. Freshwater snails of Africa and their medical importance. 2nd ed. London: Taylor and Francis Ltd; 1994.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Rollinson D, Stothard JR, Southgate VR. Interactions between intermediate snail hosts of the genus Bulinus and schistosomes of the Schistosoma haematobium group. Parasitology. 2001;123:245–60.

    Google Scholar 

  7. King CH, Sturrock RF, Kariuki HC, Hamburger J. Transmission control for schistosomiasis - why it matters now. Trends Parasitol. 2006;22:575–82.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Fenwick A, Rollinson D, Southgate V. Implementation of human schistosomiasis control: challenges and prospects. Adv Parasitol. 2006;61:567–622.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Rollinson D, Knopp S, Levitz S, Stothard JR, Tchuem Tchuenté LA, Garba A, et al. Time to set the agenda for schistosomiasis elimination. Acta Trop. 2013;128:423–40.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Kaukas A, Neto ED, Simpson AJ, Southgate VR, Rollinson D. A phylogenetic analysis of Schistosoma haematobium group species based on randomly amplified polymorphic DNA. Int J Parasitol. 1994;24:285–90.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. De Kock KN, Wolmarans CT. Distribution and habitats of the Bulinus africanus species group, snail intermediate hosts of Schistosoma haematobium and S. mattheei in South Africa. Water SA. 2005;31:117–25.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Pagès JR, Jourdane J, Southgate VR, Tchuem Tchuenté LA. Reconnaissance de deux espèces jumelles au sein du taxon Schistosoma intercalatum Fisher, 1934, agent de la schistosomose rectale humaine en Afrique. In: Combes C, Jourdane J, editors. Taxonomy, ecology and evolution of metazoan parasites, tome II. Perpignan: Presses Universitaires de Perpignan; 2003. p. 139–46.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Diakité NR, Winkler MS, Coulibaly JT, Guindo-Coulibaly N, Utzinger J, N’Goran EK. Dynamics of freshwater snails and Schistosoma infection prevalence in schoolchildren during the construction and operation of a multipurpose dam in central Côte d’Ivoire. Infect Dis Poverty. 2017;6:93.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Huyse T, Webster BL, Geldof S, Stothard JR, Diaw OT, Polman K, Rollinson D. Bidirectional introgressive hybridization between a cattle and human schistosome species. PLoS Pathog. 2009;5:e1000571.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Webster BL, Diaw OT, Seye MM, Webster JP, Rollinson D. Introgressive hybridization of Schistosoma haematobium group species in Senegal: species barrier break down between ruminant and human schistosomes. PLoS Negl Trop Dis. 2013;7:e2110.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Léger E, Webster JP. Hybridizations within the genus Schistosoma: implications for evolution, epidemiology and control. Parasitology. 2017;144:65–80.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Webster BL, Southgate VR. Compatibility of Schistosoma haematobium, S. intercalatum and their hybrids with Bulinus truncatus and B. forskalii. Parasitology. 2003;127:231–42.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. King KC, Stelkens RB, Webster JP, Smith DF, Brockhurst MA. Hybridization in parasites: consequences for adaptive evolution, pathogenesis, and public health in a changing world. PLoS Pathog. 2015;11:e1005098.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Moné H, Holtfreter MC, Allienne JF, Mintsa-Nguéma R, Ibikounlé M, Boissier J, et al. Introgressive hybridizations of Schistosoma haematobium by Schistosoma bovis at the origin of the first case report of schistosomiasis in Corsica (France, Europe). Parasitol Res. 2015;114:4127–33.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Brant SV, Loker ES. Discovery-based studies of schistosome diversity stimulate new hypotheses about parasite biology. Trends Parasitol. 2013;29:449–59.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Krauth SJ, Wandel N, Traoré SI, Vounatsou P, Hattendorf J, Achi YL, et al. Distribution of intermediate host snails of schistosomiasis and fascioliasis in relation to environmental factors during the dry season in the Tchologo region, Côte d’Ivoire. Adv Water Resour. 2017;108:386–96.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Doumenge J-P, Mott KE, Cheung C, Villenave D, Chapuis C, Perrin MF, et al. Atlas of the global distribution of Schistosomiasis. Talence: Centre d’Etudes de Géographie Tropicale (C.N.R.S.)/World Health Organization, Presse Universitaires de Bordeaux; 1987.

    Google Scholar 

  23. N’Goran EK. Biodiversité, transmission et epidemiologie de Schistosoma haematobium, Bilharz, 1852, et des schistosomoses apparentées en Côte d’Ivoire. Ph.D. thesis, Université de Perpignan; 1997.

  24. Cecchi P, Baldé S, Yapi YG. Mollusques hôtes intermédiaires de bilharzioses dans les petits barrages. L’eau en partage. Les petits barrages de Côte d’Ivoire, 2007;175–89.

  25. Ancey V. Trajectoires pastorales et politiques économiques de l’élevage: Eleveurs transhumants dans le nord de la Côte d’Ivoire. Doctoral dissertation, EHESS; 1996.

  26. Cecchi P. L’eau en partage: les petits barrages de Côte d’Ivoire. IRD Editions; 2013.

  27. Krauth SJ, Musard C, Traoré SI, Zinsstag J, Achi YL, N’Goran EK, Utzinger J. Access to, and use of, water by populations living in a schistosomiasis and fascioliasis co-endemic area of northern Côte d’Ivoire. Acta Trop. 2015;149:179–85.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Tian-Bi YNT, Ouattara M, Knopp S, Coulibaly JT, Hürlimann E, Webster B, et al. Interrupting seasonal transmission of Schistosoma haematobium and control of soil-transmitted helminthiasis in northern and central Côte d’Ivoire: a SCORE study protocol. BMC Public Health. 2018;18:186.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Tian-Bi YNT, Jarne P, Konan JN, Utzinger J, N’Goran EK. Contrasting the distribution of phenotypic and molecular variation in the freshwater snail Biomphalaria pfeifferi, the intermediate host of Schistosoma mansoni. Heredity. 2013;110:466–74.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Senghor B, Diaw OT, Doucoure S, Seye M, Talla I, Diallo A, et al. Study of the snail intermediate hosts of urogenital schistosomiasis in Niakhar, region of Fatick, west central Senegal. Parasit Vectors. 2015;8:410.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. WHO. A field guide to African freshwater snails. Danish Bilharziasis Laboratory. Charlottenlund, Denmark: WHO Collaborating Centre for Applied Malacology; 1998.

  32. Théron A. Chronobiology of trematode cercarial emergence: from data recovery to epidemiological, ecological and evolutionary implications. Adv Parasitol. 2015;88:123–64.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Frandsen F, Christensen NO. An introductory guide to the identification of cercariae from African freshwater snails with special reference to cercariae of trematode species of medical and veterinary importance. Acta Trop. 1984;41:181–202.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Webster BL, Rabone M, Pennance T, Emery AM, Allan F, Gouvras A, et al. Development of novel multiplex microsatellite polymerase chain reactions to enable high-throughput population genetic studies of Schistosoma haematobium. Parasit Vectors. 2015;8:432.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  35. Webster BL, Rollinson D, Stothard JR, Huyse T. Rapid diagnostic multiplex PCR (RD-PCR) to discriminate Schistosoma haematobium and S. bovis. J Helminthol. 2010;84:107–14.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  36. Emery AM, Allan FE, Rabone ME, Rollinson D. Schistosomiasis collection at NHM (SCAN). Parasit Vectors. 2012;5:185.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. Folmer O, Black M, Hoeh W, Lutz R. DNA primers for amplification of mitochondrial cytochrome c oxidase subunit I from diverse metazoan invertebrates. Mol Marine Biol Biotechnol. 1994;3:294–9.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  38. Kane RA, Stothard JR, Emery AM, Rollinson D. Molecular characterization of freshwater snails in the genus Bulinus: a role for barcodes? Parasit Vectors. 2008;1:15.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  39. Clopper CJ, Pearson ES. The use of confidence or fiducial limits illustrated in the case of the binomial. Biometrika. 1934;26:404–13.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  40. R Core Team. R: A language and environment for statistical computing. Vienna, Austria: R Foundation for Statistical Computing; 2017. https://www.R-project.org/. Accessed 15 Jan 2019.

  41. Bremond P, Pasteur N, Combes C, Renaud F, Theron A. Experimental host-induced selection in Schistosoma mansoni strains from Guadeloupe and comparison with natural observations. Heredity. 1993;70:33–7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  42. Léger E, Garba A, Hamidou AA, Webster BL, Pennance T, Rollinson D, Webster JP. Introgressed animal schistosomes Schistosoma curassoni and S. bovis naturally infecting humans. Emerg Infect Dis. 2016;22:2212.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  43. Soentjens P, Cnops L, Huyse T, Yansouni C, De Vos D, Bottieau E, et al. Diagnosis and clinical management of Schistosoma haematobium-Schistosoma bovis hybrid infection in a cluster of travelers returning from Mali. Clin Infect Dis. 2016;63:1626–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  44. N’Goran E, Brémond P, Sellin E, Sellin B, Théron A. Intraspecific diversity of Schistosoma haematobium in West Africa: chronobiology of cercarial emergence. Acta Trop. 1997;66:35–44.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  45. Rollinson D, Southgate VR, Vercruysse J, Moore JP. Observations on natural and experimental interactions between Schistosoma bovis and S. curassoni from West Africa. Acta Trop. 1990;47:101–4.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  46. Sire C, Rognon A, Theron A. Failure of Schistosoma mansoni to re-infect Biomphalaria glabrata snails: acquired humoral resistance or intra-specific larval antagonism? Parasitology. 1998;117:117–22.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  47. Allan F, Rollinson D, Smith JE, Dunn AM. Host choice and penetration by Schistosoma haematobium miracidia. J Helminthol. 2009;83:33–8.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  48. Chao D, Wang L, Huang T. Prevalence of larval helminths in freshwater snails of the Kinmen Island. J Helminthol. 1993;67:259–64.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  49. Schmidt KA, Fried B. Prevalence of larval trematode in Helisoma trivolvis (Gastropoda) from a farm pond in Northampton County, Pennsylvania with special reference to Echinostoma trivolvis (Trematoda) cercaria. J Helminthol Soc Wash. 1997;64:157–9.

    Google Scholar 

  50. Pennance T, Ame SM, Amour AK, Suleiman KR, Allan F, Rollinson D, Webster BL. Occurrence of Schistosoma bovis on Pemba Island, Zanzibar: implications for urogenital schistosomiasis transmission monitoring. Parasitology. 2018;145:1727–31.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors are grateful to all members of the SCORE secretariat for their valuable comments and suggestions on this article. They thank the health personnel for their assistance during the field surveys, particularly Aboudramane Ouattara, Robert Palé, Amoro Diabagaté, Franck N. Som, Kipo Zina, Falé Dagnogo, Doubé Koné, Kassoum Ouattara, Naminata Ouattara, N’Gbandama N’Guessan, Anatole K. Kouakou, Akagny Kouadio, Kouadio K. Donatien, Douogbeu Lucien, Kouakou L. Béibro, Teneba Marko and Charlène Aya. They are indebted to the health, education and village authorities of the regions of Belier, Bounkani, Gbêkê, Hambol and Tchologo for their contribution.

Funding

This study received financial support through a sub-award from the University of Georgia Research Foundation for the Schistosomiasis Consortium for Operational Research and Evaluation (SCORE) project, which was awarded by the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation (prime award no. 50816). This SCORE sub-award provided for all the components of this study in Côte d’Ivoire. FA and MR were financially supported by the Wellcome Trust (SCAN Project WT104958MA).

Availability of data and materials

Data supporting the conclusions of this article are included within the article and its additional file. Sequence data generated from the cercariae were submitted to the GenBank database under the accession numbers MK333532-MK333538.

Authors’ contributions

Project design and supervision: JU, EKN and DR. Study preparation, baseline and follow-up field surveys: YNTTB, BW, CKK, FA, NRD, MO, DS, AK, AKK, JTC and AM. Laboratory data collection, analysis and interpretation: YNTTB, BW, CKK, FA and MR. Drafting and revisions of manuscript: YNTTB, BW, FA, SK, JU, EKN, MR and DR. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Ethics approval and consent to participate

This study was part of a large project facilitated by the Schistosomiasis Consortium for Operational Research and Evaluation (SCORE), which has been approved by the institutional research commissions of the Centre Suisse de Recherches Scientifiques en Côte d’Ivoire (CSRS; Abidjan, Côte d’Ivoire) and the Swiss Tropical and Public Health Institute (Swiss TPH; Basel, Switzerland). Ethical approval was obtained from the ethics committees in Switzerland: “Ethikkommission Nordwest- und Zentralschweiz” (EKNZ; reference no. UBE-15/34; date of approval 15 April 2015) and Côte d’Ivoire: Comité National d’Éthique et de la Recherche, Ministère de la Santé et de Lutte contre le SIDA (reference no. 007/MSLS/CNER-kp; date of approval 2 February 2016) and Direction Générale des Productions et de la Sécurité Alimentaire, Ministère de l’Agriculture (reference no. 0163/MINAGRI/DGPSA/DPVCQ; date of approval 27 January 2015). The purpose of the study and procedures for field sample collection were explained to village authorities and their verbal agreement was obtained before conducting field surveys.

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Unité de Formation et de Recherche Biosciences, Université Félix Houphouët-Boigny, 22 BP 770, Abidjan 22, Côte d’Ivoire

    Yves-Nathan T. Tian-Bi, Cyrille K. Konan, Nana R. Diakité, Mamadou Ouattara, Jean T. Coulibaly & Eliézer K. N’Goran

  2. Centre Suisse de Recherches Scientifiques en Côte d’Ivoire, 01 BP 1303, Abidjan 01, Côte d’Ivoire

    Yves-Nathan T. Tian-Bi, Cyrille K. Konan, Nana R. Diakité, Mamadou Ouattara, Jean T. Coulibaly & Eliézer K. N’Goran

  3. Wolfson Wellcome Biomedical Laboratories, Department of Life Sciences, Natural History Museum, Cromwell Road, London, SW7 5BD, UK

    Bonnie Webster, Fiona Allan, Muriel Rabone & David Rollinson

  4. Centre d’Entomologie Médicale et Vétérinaire, Université Alassane Ouattara de Bouaké, 27 BP 529, Abidjan 27, Côte d’Ivoire

    Diabaté Salia

  5. Institut National d’Hygiène Publique, Ministère de la Santé et de l’Hygiène Publique, Boulevard Du Port (Chu)-Treichville, Bp V 14, Abidjan, Côte d’Ivoire

    Amani Koné & Adolphe K. Kakou

  6. Swiss Tropical and Public Health Institute, P.O. Box, CH–4002, Basel, Switzerland

    Jean T. Coulibaly, Stefanie Knopp & Jürg Utzinger

  7. University of Basel, P.O. Box, CH–4003, Basel, Switzerland

    Jean T. Coulibaly, Stefanie Knopp & Jürg Utzinger

  8. Programme National de Lutte contre les Maladies Tropicales Négligées à Chimiothérapie Préventive (PNLMTN-CP), Ministère de la Santé et de l’Hygiène Publique, 06 BP 6394, Abidjan 06, Côte d’Ivoire

    Aboulaye Meïté

Authors
  1. Yves-Nathan T. Tian-Bi
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Bonnie Webster
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Cyrille K. Konan
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Fiona Allan
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Nana R. Diakité
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. Mamadou Ouattara
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  7. Diabaté Salia
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  8. Amani Koné
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  9. Adolphe K. Kakou
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  10. Muriel Rabone
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  11. Jean T. Coulibaly
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  12. Stefanie Knopp
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  13. Aboulaye Meïté
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  14. Jürg Utzinger
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  15. Eliézer K. N’Goran
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  16. David Rollinson
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Bonnie Webster.

Additional file

Additional file 1: Table S1.

Snail collection and schistosome infection data. N = North, C = Central. Snail identification is based on shell morphology, except for the positive snails that were molecularly identified.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Tian-Bi, YN.T., Webster, B., Konan, C.K. et al. Molecular characterization and distribution of Schistosoma cercariae collected from naturally infected bulinid snails in northern and central Côte d’Ivoire. Parasites Vectors 12, 117 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1186/s13071-019-3381-3

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s13071-019-3381-3

Keywords

Parasites & Vectors

ISSN: 1756-3305

Contact us