Skip to main content
Download PDF

Immunogenicity analysis of genetically conserved segments in Plasmodium ovale merozoite surface protein-8

Parasites & Vectors volume 12, Article number: 164 (2019) Cite this article

Abstract

Background

Plasmodium ovale is widely distributed across tropical regions and has two closely related but distinct species, namely P. ovale curtisi and P. ovale wallikeri. Combining genetic characterization with the immunogenicity of merozoite surface protein-8 (MSP-8) supports considering MSP-8 as a candidate target for blood-stage vaccines against malaria. However, no previous studies have focused on characterizing the genetic diversity and immunogenicity of PoMSP-8.

Methods

Blood samples were collected from 42 patients infected with P. ovale. The patients were migrant workers returning to the Jiangsu Province from Africa; genomic DNA was extracted from their blood samples for sequencing and protein expression. The recombinant PoMSP-8 (rPoMSP-8) proteins were expressed and purified to assess their immune responses in BALB/c mice.

Results

The sequences of the P. ovale curtisi and P. ovale wallikeri msp8 genes were completely conserved in each isolate. The rPoMSP-8 proteins were successfully expressed and purified as ~70 kDa proteins. Antibodies raised against rPoMSP-8 in mice showed appropriate immunoreactivity, as evidenced by immunoblotting. These specific antibodies were detected at day 7 post-immunization, and their levels increased throughout the whole immunization period. rPoMSP-8-raised antibodies had high endpoint titers (1:5,120,000) and high avidity (PocMSP-8: 94.84%, PowMSP-8: 92.69%). Cross-reactivity between rPocMSP-8 and rPowMSP-8 was observed with each anti-PoMSP8-specific antibody.

Conclusions

Remarkable conservation and high immunogenicity was observed in both rPoMSP-8s. Intriguingly, cross-reaction between rPocMSP-8 and rPowMSP-8 was detected, suggesting that a single PoMSP8-based construction might be applicable for both species.

Background

Malaria remains a disease of global health importance [1]. In 2017, an estimated 219 million cases of malaria and 435,000 malaria-caused deaths were reported [2]. One causative agent of human malaria, Plasmodium ovale, was first described by Stevens [3]. Ovale malaria in humans is caused by two closely related but distinct subspecies of the malarial parasite, P. ovale curtisi (the classic type) and P. ovale wallikeri (the variant type) [4]. Little attention has been paid to ovale malaria because it often presents with low parasitemia and mixed infection with other Plasmodium species, with mild clinical symptoms that are easily treated with the conventional antimalarial drug chloroquine [5,6,7,8,9].

Jiangsu Province, located in eastern China, was previously an unstable malaria-transmission area. After large-scale implementation of interventions such as mass drug administration, indoor residual spraying, and long-lasting insecticide nets, malaria has been effectively controlled in the Jiangsu Province [10], and no report of local malaria infection has been issued since 2012 [11]. With the continuous expansion and deepening of the China-Africa cooperation, large numbers of Chinese people travel to malaria-endemic countries for trade, tourism, labor and other purposes [12]. Between 2014 and 2016, 1068 imported cases of malaria were reported in the Jiangsu Province, and approximately 170 cases of malaria in China imported from Africa were caused by P. ovale [13].

Parasite antigenic diversity has become a major obstacle hindering the development of effective malaria vaccines [14]. Erythrocyte invasion is a critical point in the life-cycle of malaria parasites and it is at this point that merozoites can be targeted by antibodies and eliminated by immune cells [15]. This type of vaccine generally incorporates antigenic proteins that are highly expressed on, or associated with, the surface of merozoites, such as the merozoite surface proteins (MSPs) [14]. MSPs comprise some of the best characterized proteins in P. falciparum and some of them are considered promising vaccine candidates due to their accessibility to interaction with host immune system molecules [15]. MSP-8 is a glycosylphosphatidylinositol (GPI)-anchored protein produced by blood-stage malaria parasites. MSP-8 contains a signal sequence at the N-terminus and two epidermal growth factor (EGF)-like domains at the C-terminus with significant homology to those of other Plasmodium species. Serum from patients infected with P. falciparum could react against several PfMSP-8 fragments [16]. Likewise, P. vivax MSP-8 could induce humoral and cellular immune responses during P. vivax infection [17]. These data demonstrated that both PfMSP-8 and PvMSP-8 were immunogenic during natural infection. Immunization with P. yoelii MSP-8 (PyMSP-8) induced a level of protection in mice to lethal P. yoelii challenge [18]. Thus, PyMSP-8 was a target of protective immune responses. MSP-8 proteins are highly conserved across all Plasmodium sp. [19]. The conservation of MSP-8 proteins support their consideration as part of malaria vaccine formulations [20].

Therefore, MSP-8 from various malarial parasite species have been considered good vaccine candidates. However, insufficient evidence exists regarding the diversity and immunogenicity of P. ovale MSP-8 (PoMSP-8). In this study, msp8 sequences were analyzed from both P. ovale sp. obtained from infected migrant workers returning to China from Africa. Sequence analysis of the pomsp8 genes showed complete conservation. The recombinant PoMSP-8 (rPoMSP-8) proteins were produced, and high immunogenicity was detected in immunized mice.

Methods

Study areas and sample collection

P. ovale curtisi and P. ovale wallikeri samples were obtained at local hospitals in the Jiangsu Province in China between 2012 and 2016 from febrile patients who had recently returned from working in tropical regions of sub-Saharan Africa, endemic for malaria [21]. Identification of the isolates was confirmed by polymerase chain reaction (PCR) analysis and Plasmodium species were distinguished by real-time TaqMan PCR [11]. A total of 42 P. ovale-infected blood samples were randomly selected and analyzed. As a result, we identified 24 P. ovale curtisi samples and 18 P. ovale wallikeri samples. Full details of the isolates were provided (Additional file 1: Table S1).

Cloning and sequencing

The full-length sequences of pocmsp8 and powmsp8 were amplified by PCR using the primers pocmsp8-Forward (5′-ATG GTT ATG ATT ATG AAA AAG AA-3′) and pocmsp8-Reverse (5′-CTA TAA TAA ATA TAC ACA TAA CAT C-3′), and powmsp8-Forward (5′-ATG GTT ATG ATT ATG AAA AAG AA-3′) and powmsp8-Reverse (5′-CTA TAA TAA ATA TAC ACA TAA CAT C-3′), respectively. The pocmsp8 (PlasmoDB, PocGH01_10040100) and powmsp8 (GenBank accession number, SBT74417.1) sequences from the Plasmodium Genomics Resource database and the National Center for Biotechnology Information GenBank database were used as reference gene sequences. The reactions were performed in a 20 µl reaction volume, including 1 μl of genomic DNA, 7.4 μl of double-distilled water, 0.8 μl of each primer, 0.5 units of DNA polymerase, 2 mM deoxynucleoside triphosphate and 10 μl of premix (2× Phanta® Max Master Mix, Vazyme, Nanjing, China). PCR amplification was performed in a Mastercycler (Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany) with the following program: denaturation at 95 °C for 3 min; 35 cycles of 95 °C for 15 s, 45 °C for 15 s and 72 °C for 30 s; and a final extension at 72 °C for 5 min. The amplified products were analyzed by 1% agarose gel electrophoresis and visualized under an ultraviolet transilluminator (ChemiDoc MP, Bio-Rad, Hercules, CA, USA). The PCR product sizes were estimated based on the mobilities relative to a standard DNA marker (Transgen Biotech, Beijing, China). PCR products were cloned into the pUC57 vector and sequenced using universal primers (M13F: 5′-TGT AAA ACG ACG GCC AGT-3′; M13R: 5′-CAG GAA ACA GCT ATG AC-3′), which was performed by GENEWIZ (Suzhou, China) on an ABI 3730xl DNA Analyzer (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Waltham, MA, USA).

Sequence alignment and data analysis

The primary structure of the PoMSP-8 protein was predicted with a bioinformatics tool (http://smart.embl-heidelberg.de/). To evaluate the diversity of both P. ovale sp., the pocmsp8 and powmsp8 sequences were used as templates and aligned using GeneDoc v.2.7.0.

Recombinant protein expression and purification

The pomsp8 gene were subcloned into the pET32a expression vector (YouLong Biotech, Shanghai, China). This vector adds thioredoxin and six-histidine tags at both the N- and C-terminal ends, enabling easier purification and immunodetection using monoclonal antibodies against the six-histidine tag. Next, rosetta-gami bacteria (Transgen Biotech) were transformed with the recombinant plasmids. This strain contains a plasmid that encodes additional copies of rare Escherichia coli (E. coli) tRNAs for enhanced expression of foreign proteins. Proteins were purified by YouLong Biotech. Protein expression was verified by 8% sodium dodecyl sulfate-polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis (SDS-PAGE) with Coomassie blue staining or western blot analysis.

Mice immunizations

Female BALB/c mice, 6–8 weeks of age, were used for immunizations (rPoMSP-8-immunized group and the negative-control group, n = 4 per group). Purified rPoMSP-8, 30 μg, was injected into each mouse. Complete Freund’s adjuvant (CFA; Sigma, San Francisco, CA, USA) was used for the primary booster, and incomplete Freund’s adjuvant (IFA; Sigma, San Francisco, CA, USA) was used for the subsequent boosters. Boosters were administered on days 21 and 42 post-immunization. All injections were given intraperitoneally. The serum of each mouse was collected at days 0, 7, 14, 28, 35 and 49 post-immunization. Mice in the negative-control group were injected with a mixture of PBS and adjuvant.

For western immunoblot analysis, rPoMSP-8 antigens were electrophoretically transferred from SDS-PAGE gels to 0.2 μm polyvinylidene fluoride membranes (Millipore, Darmstadt, Germany) and probed with serum pooled from mice immunized with recombinant proteins acquired at day 49 and diluted 1:1000. Immunoreactivity was detected using a polyclonal goat anti-mouse antibody as a secondary antibody (Southern Biotech, Tuscaloosa, AL, USA).

Antibody responses

Antibody responses to PoMSP-8 at 0, 7, 14, 28, 35 and 49 days after primary immunization were measured by performing enzyme-linked immunosorbent assays (ELISAs). Briefly, 50 ng of rPoMSP-8 antigens were coated overnight at 4 °C in 96-well ELISA plates (Corning, Corning, NY, USA). After blocking with 1× PBS containing 1% bovine serum albumin (BSA; Beyotime Biotechnology, Beijing, China), the serum samples were diluted 1:20,000 in 1× PBS containing Tween 20 (PBS-T) and 0.5% BSA, and incubated in duplicate wells for 90 min. Horseradish peroxidase-conjugated goat anti-mouse IgG antibodies (Southern Biotech) were diluted 1:5000 and used to detect the IgG antibodies bound to PoMSP-8. The reaction was developed by adding the 3, 3′, 5, 5′-tetramethylbenzidine (Invitrogen, Waltham, MA, USA) as a substrate and then stopped by adding 2 M H2SO4; the absorbance was then measured at 450 nm. To evaluate the titration of specific anti-PoMSP-8 antibodies, sera from mice in each group were pooled and used in serial dilutions (1:10,000 to 1:5,120,000) in ELISA.

The avidity of anti-rPoMSP-8 IgG antibodies was estimated as described previously [22]. Briefly, ELISA testing was performed as described above, except that the test was performed in duplicate plates. After diluting the sera (1:20,000) and incubating for 90 min, one of the plates was washed three times with PBS-T, and the other plate was incubated with the same sera and washed three times with dissociation buffer, comprised of PBS-T with 6 M urea. Then, the plates were washed once with PBS-T buffer. Incubation with a secondary antibody, the wash steps, and developing the enzyme reaction were performed as described above for the ELISAs. The avidity index (AI) for each sample was calculated as follows:

$$ {\text{AI}} = ({\text{OD}}_{ 4 50} \;{\text{of a sample treated with 6 M urea}}/{\text{OD}}_{ 4 50} \;{\text{of a sample not treated with 6 M urea}}) \times 100. $$

Statistical analysis

Statistical analysis and graphing were done using GraphPad Prism software, v.5.0 (GraphPad Software Inc., San Diego, CA, USA). To analyze cross-reaction and antibody responses, the data were analyzed by SPSS v.16.0. Student’s t-test was used to analyzed data emerging on normal distribution, with probability (P) values > 0.05 considered to reflect not statistically significant differences. Phylogenetic trees for MSP-8 were constructed using the neighbor-joining method based on the nucleotide sequences. Phylogenetic relationships based on the msp8 gene were estimated using the neighbor-joining (NJ) method in MEGA v.7.0, the general time reversible (GTR) nucleotide model with a gamma (γ)-distribution model of among-site rate variation and a proportion of invariable sites (i.e. the GTR + γ + I substitution model) determined. The evolutionary relationships of the aligned sequences were determined using MEGA v.7.0.

Results

Description and gene analysis of PoMSP-8

The single-exon P. ovale curtisi and P. ovale wallikeri msp8 genes were both found to be 1446 base pairs long and to begin with a predicted 28-amino acid (aa) signal peptide sequence (aa 1–28). Some other specific regions were identified in the predicted primary structure of the pomsp8, such as a coiled-coil domain (aa 100–121), two epidermal growth factor (EGF)-like domains (aa 376–415 and 421–458), a transmembrane region (aa 461–480) and a GPI-anchor (aa 457–481) (Fig. 1a). To verify this putative gene structure for pomsp8, we prepared genomic DNA from patients infected with P. ovale and used it as the PCR template. Pomsp8 genes were successfully amplified by PCR in all isolates, generating single PCR products of the expected size (~ 1.5 kb). Direct sequencing of these purified PCR fragments showed no superimposed signal on the electropherograms for pomsp8 (Fig. 1b). Overall, the full length alignments for pomsp8 showed that no amino acid mutations occurred among the 24 pocmsp8 samples and 18 powmsp8 samples originating from 15 countries in sub-Saharan Africa (Additional file 2: Figure S1). These findings suggested that the pomsp8 genes were completely conserved in each isolate.

Fig. 1
figure 1

Schematic representation of the gene structure and amino acid sequence alignment of P. ovale MSP-8 C-terminal fragment. a Diagram of the gene structure of pomsp-8. Both pomsp-8 genes encode a signal peptide (blue), a coiled-coil domain (yellow), two EGF-like domains (green) and a GPI-anchor (red). b The full-length msp-8 genes of 42 P. ovale isolates were amplified by PCR

Full size image

Phylogenetic analysis

Based on the high level of genetic conservation presented above, phylogenetic analysis was performed using msp8 gene sequences from human, non-human primate, murine and avian malarial species, using the neighbor-joining method. This analysis showed that pocmsp8 and powmsp8 occupied a distinct bifurcating branch with 98 and 95% bootstrap support, respectively (Fig. 2). The msp8 gene ID number of other Plasmodium species included in the analyses are provided in Additional file 3: Table S2.

Fig. 2
figure 2

Phylogenetic trees using nucleotide sequences of the gene encoding MSP-8, based on the neighbor-joining method. The length of gene sequences was shown in the figure. The scale-bar indicates the number of nucleotide substitutions per site. The accession numbers of newly generated pocmsp8 and powmsp8 sequences were MK629721 and MK629720

Full size image

Expression and purification of recombinant PoMSP-8

Truncated PoMSP-8 (ΔSP) proteins are predicted to consist of 430 aa residues with a molecular weight of 52 kDa. Both recombinant soluble forms of PoMSP-8 were successfully expressed using E. coli expression system and purified using an Ni-Sepharose column. The purity of the recombinant PoMSP-8 proteins were assessed. The pET32a adds thioredoxin and six-histidine tags at both the N- and C-terminal ends, so the proteins migrated with a molecular weight of ~70 kDa, based on SDS-PAGE analysis (Fig. 3a). Moreover, the corresponding immunoblots probed with an anti-His tag antibody confirmed that rPoMSP-8 was expressed (Fig. 3b). The confirmed proteins were used to immunize mice.

Fig. 3
figure 3

Expression and western blot analysis of PoMSP-8. a The purified PoMSP-8 proteins were analyzed by SDS-PAGE. Analysis of rPoMSP-8 showed that they had a molecular weight of approximately 70 kDa. b Western blot analysis of rPoMSP-8 using an anti-His antibody. Arrowheads indicate specific bands for each recombinant protein. A molecular mass marker is shown on the left-hand side in kDa

Full size image

Mice antibodies against PoMSP-8 recognized the recombinant proteins

To determine whether mice anti-rPoMSP8 antibodies could recognize the rPoMSP-8s, we developed an immunoblot for a specific ~70 kDa band that should be detected for both PoMSP-8s. The antibody responses of immunized mouse sera against PoMSP-8 were potent, suggesting that PoMSP-8 is highly immunogenic in mice. As a negative control, no reactivity was observed in sera from mice before immunization (Fig. 4a). To identify cross-reaction between PocMSP-8 and PowMSP-8, the antibodies raised against PowMSP-8 were reacted with rPocMSP-8, and mouse antiserum raised against PocMSP-8 were cross-reacted with rPowMSP-8 (Fig. 4b, c, P > 0.05). Then, cross-reactivity was verified using anti-rPoMSP-8 immune mouse serum with rPoMSP-8s (Fig. 4d). These results showed that rPoMSP-8 could induce immune response in mice and the mice anti-rPoMSP8 antibodies could recognize the rPoMSP-8s.

Fig. 4
figure 4

Reactivity of serum from mice immunized with rPoMSP-8. a Western blot analysis to determine whether the rPoMSP-8 proteins were reactive with sera from mice immunized with recombinant PoMSP-8 proteins, the sera from mice immunized with PBS and adjuvant as a negative control. b Cross-reaction of PocMSP-8 with sera from mice immunized with recombinant PowMSP-8 proteins. c Cross-reaction of PowMSP-8 with sera from mice immunized with recombinant PocMSP-8 proteins (PC, positive control). A statistically significant difference was not observed. d Cross-reactivity was verified by western blotting

Full size image

Immune responses against rPoMSP-8 in mice

To begin characterizing immune responses generated by immunization with PoMSP-8, groups of 4 BALB/c mice were immunized with rPocMSP-8, rPowMSP-8, or PBS as a control, and the resultant antibody responses were measured by ELISA using the same recombinant proteins as the solid-phase coating antigen. The results provided in Fig. 5 show that both recombinants were immunogenic. ELISA results showed that antibodies against PoMSP-8 were detected one week after the primary booster. A high response was detected at day 14 post-immunization and continued to rise until day 28 post-immunization (Fig. 5a).

Fig. 5
figure 5

Immune responses in PoMSP-8-immunized mice. a IgG levels in PoMSP-8-immunized mice. IgG was detected at day 7 post-immunization, and the levels increased throughout the whole immunization period. b Data are presented as the geometric mean OD obtained at different concentrations, expressed as the reciprocal of the serum dilution obtained from mice immunized with PocMSP-8 or PowMSP-8 (dilutions from 1:10,000 to 1:5,120,000). Numbers on the X-axis indicate the dilutions tested. Antigen specificity was confirmed using pre-immune serum samples as a control

Full size image

The mean serum antibody titers were evaluated 49 days after first immunization by ELISA. Similarly, PocMSP-8 and PowMSP-8 were linearly detected in ELISAs, and the PocMSP-8 and PowMSP-8 antigens could induce comparable IgG end-point titers (1:5,120,000; Fig. 5b).

In this study, high-avidity IgG antibodies were induced in all mouse groups immunized with adjuvant formulations. A higher IgG avidity response was detected in mice immunized with PocMSP-8 (mean: 94.84%) than was detected in mice immunized with PowMSP-8 (mean: 94.89%), but this difference was not statistically significant (P > 0.05).

Discussion

Investigations into the extent of sequence variation amongst malaria vaccine candidates are undoubtedly important as the basis of effective malaria vaccine development. Here, we analyzed 42 clinical isolates from imported cases from Africa. The full length of pomsp8 sequences (24 pocmsp8 isolates and 18 powmsp8 isolates) were completely conserved. The high degree of conservation observed among samples from 15 different African countries suggests that pomsp8 may be useful in PCR-based diagnostic testing for P. ovale. This result is consistent with other reports in terms of MSP-8 sequence conservation in P. falciparum, P. vivax and P. yoelii [19, 20]. These findings suggest that the degree of conservation could be the result of maintained functions during red blood cell invasion and/or that these domains perform related or redundant roles in the parasite’s life-cycle [23, 24].

The msp8 sequences placed P. ovale curtisi and P. ovale wallikeri in a distinct bifurcating branch in the phylogenetic tree and the results support an ancient time of divergence for the malarial parasite lineage [25]. This phylogenetic arrangement clearly indicates that P. malariae forms an outgroup both to rodent-infective species and to a primate-infective clade that includes P. vivax [26]. Whereas we found no conclusive evidence of selection acting on the polymorphism of P. ovale, likely due to the limited sample size, our comparative analyses based on phylogenetic methods indicate that msp8 genes diverged under strong negative (purifying) selection, indicating functional constrains. The evidence that these proteins were conserved due to the potential action of purifying selection during their evolutionary history provides additional support for their consideration in malaria vaccine formulations.

Polymorphisms and immunogenicity are both within the scope of consideration when screening for new preclinical vaccine candidates. It had been reported that conserved regions were less antigenic and immunogenic than polymorphic regions [27,28,29]. Interestingly, the high conservation seen in PoMSP-8 mice was associated with a high level of immunogenicity, as both antibody titers were 1:5,120,000. This fragment of MSP-8 was expressed on the merozoite surface through a GPI-anchor and is taken up into erythrocytes [30]. GPI-anchors were previously found to be potent agonists of the toll-like receptor, as were adjuvants that facilitate immune responses [31]. As a surface protein, MSP-8 was exposed to the host immune system.

Antibodies play essential roles in protecting against blood-stage malaria. In this study, sera from mice immunized showed positive reactivity with rPocMSP-8 and rPowMSP-8, which are recombinant proteins. The fact that PoMSP-8 elicited humoral immune responses supports the conclusion that the conserved sequences contain B epitopes. Cross-reaction between PocMSP-8 and PowMSP-8 was detected by both ELISA and western immunoblot analyses. These findings suggested that rPoMSP-8 shares similar and conserved antigenic determinants and that a complex network of cross-reactivity exists between P. ovale sp. The finding may explain the diversity between different species and enable measurements of species-specific efficacy in vaccine trials.

Production of high-avidity antibodies is essential for preventing severe disease during malaria infections. Our results indicated that both PocMSP-8 and PowMSP-8 induced high avidity antibodies (PocMSP-8: 94.84%, PowMSP-8: 92.69%). High-quality antibodies represent an important factor involved in preventing and protecting against infections [32]. These findings suggest that MSP-8 in mice is a valid model for understanding the immune response and may compensate for the difficulty of culturing this parasite in vitro. As such, it warrants further study.

Conclusions

The findings of this study demonstrate the remarkable conservation and high immunogenicity of both PoMSP-8s. Cross-reaction between PocMSP-8 and PowMSP-8 was detected, suggesting that immune responses may be mediated by a repertoire of antibodies to common epitopes between both P. ovale subspecies. These data provide valuable reference information regarding the genetic diversity and immunogenicity of P. ovale curtisi and P. ovale wallikeri isolates imported from Africa to China. Therefore, PoMSP-8 may potentially serve as a candidate for malaria vaccine design, although further evaluation needs be carried out to validate its potential and limitations.

Abbreviations

MSP-8:

merozoite surface protein-8

rPoMSP-8:

recombinant PoMSP-8

GPI:

glycosylphosphatidylinositol

PCR:

polymerase chain reaction

aa:

amino acid

EGF:

epidermal growth factor

ELISA:

enzyme-linked immunosorbent assays

AI:

avidity index

References

  1. Cowman AF, Healer J, Marapana D, Marsh K. Malaria: biology and disease. Cell. 2016;167:610–24.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. WHO. World malaria report (2018). Geneva: World Health Organization; 2018.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Stephens JWW. A new malaria parasite of man. Ann Trop Med Parasitol. 1922;16:383–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Sutherland CJ, Tanomsing N, Nolder D, Oguike M, Jennison C, Pukrittayakamee S. Two nonrecombining sympatric forms of the human malaria parasite Plasmodium ovale occur globally. J Infect Dis. 2010;201:1544–50.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Zhou R, Liu Y, Li S, Zhao Y, Huang F, Yang C, et al. Polymorphisms analysis of the Plasmodium ovale tryptophan-rich antigen gene (potra) from imported malaria cases in Henan Province. Malar J. 2018;17:127.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Roucher C, Rogier C, Sokhna C, Tall A, Trape JF. A 20-year longitudinal study of Plasmodium ovale and Plasmodium malariae prevalence and morbidity in a West African population. PLoS One. 2014;9:e87169.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Doderer-Lang C, Atchade PS, Meckert L, Haar E, Perrotey S, Filisetti D, et al. The ears of the African elephant: unexpected high seroprevalence of Plasmodium ovale and Plasmodium malariae in healthy populations in western Africa. Malar J. 2014;13:240.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Faye FBK, Spiegel A, Tall A, Sokhna C, Fontenille D, Rogier C, et al. Diagnostic criteria and risk factors for Plasmodium ovale malaria. J Infect Dis. 2002;186:690–5.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Oguike MC, Betson M, Burke M, Nolder D, Stothard JR, Kleinschmidt I, et al. Plasmodium ovale curtisi and Plasmodium ovale wallikeri circulate simultaneously in African communities. Int J Parasitol. 2011;41:677–83.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Hsiang MS, Hwang J, Tao AR, Liu Y, Bennett A, Shanks GD, et al. Mass drug administration for the control and elimination of Plasmodium vivax malaria: an ecological study from Jiangsu province, China. Malar J. 2013;12:383.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Cao Y, Wang W, Liu Y, Cotter C, Zhou H, Zhu G, et al. The increasing importance of Plasmodium ovale and Plasmodium malariae in a malaria elimination setting: an observational study of imported cases in Jiangsu Province, China, 2011–2014. Malar J. 2016;15:459.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Liu Y, Hsiang MS, Zhou H, Wang W, Cao Y, Gosling RD, et al. Malaria in overseas labourers returning to China: an analysis of imported malaria in Jiangsu Province, 2001–2011. Malar J. 2014;13:29.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Cao YY, Wang WM, Zhou HY, Zhu GD, Xu S, Gu YP, et al. Cases diagnosis of imported malaria in Jiangsu Province, 2014–2016. Chin J Epidemiol. 2018;39:218 (In Chinese).

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Richie TL, Saul A. Progress and challenges for malaria vaccines. Nature. 2002;415:694–701.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Barry AE, Arnott A. Strategies for designing and monitoring malaria vaccines targeting diverse antigens. Front Immunol. 2014;5:359.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Black CG, Wu T, Wang L, Hibbs AR, Coppel RL. Merozoite surface protein 8 of Plasmodium falciparum contains two epidermal growth factor-like domains. Mol Biochem Parasitol. 2001;114:217–26.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Cheng Y, Wang B, Changrob S, Han JH, Sattabongkot J, Ha KS, et al. Naturally acquired humoral and cellular immune responses to Plasmodium vivax merozoite surface protein 8 in patients with P. vivax infection. Malar J. 2017;16:211.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. James M, Burns J, Belk CC, Dunn PD. A protective glycosylphosphatidylinositol-anchored membrane protein of Plasmodium yoelii trophozoites and merozoites contains two epidermal growth factor-like domains. Infect Immun. 2000;68:6189–95.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Alaro JR, Angov E, Lopez AM, Zhou H, Long CA, Burns JM Jr. Evaluation of the immunogenicity and vaccine potential of recombinant Plasmodium falciparum merozoite surface protein 8. Infect Immun. 2012;80:2473–84.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Pacheco MA, Elango AP, Rahman AA, Fisher D, Collins WE, Barnwell JW, et al. Evidence of purifying selection on merozoite surface protein 8 (MSP8) and 10 (MSP10) in Plasmodium spp. Infect Genet Evol. 2012;12:978.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Chu R, Zhang X, Xu S, Chen L, Tang J, Li Y, et al. Limited genetic diversity of N-terminal of merozoite surface protein-1 (MSP-1) in Plasmodium ovale curtisi and P. ovale wallikeri imported from Africa to China. Parasit Vectors. 2018;11:596.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Mehrizi AA, Rezvani N, Zakeri S, Gholami A, Babaeekhou L. Poly(I:C) adjuvant strongly enhances parasite-inhibitory antibodies and Th1 response against Plasmodium falciparum merozoite surface protein-1 (42-kDa fragment) in BALB/c mice. Med Microbiol Immunol. 2018;207:151–66.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Perez-Leal O, Sierra AY, Barrero CA, Moncada C, Martinez P, Cortes J, et al. Plasmodium vivax merozoite surface protein 8 cloning, expression, and characterisation. Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 2004;324:1393–9.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Bull PC, Lowe BS, Kortok M, Molyneux CS, Newbold CI, Marsh K. Parasite antigens on the infected red cell surface are targets for naturally acquired immunity to malaria. Nat Med. 1998;4:358–60.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Silva JC, Egan A, Friedman R, Munro JB, Carlton JM, Hughes AL. Genome sequences reveal divergence times of malaria parasite lineages. Parasitology. 2011;138:1737–49.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Rutledge GG, Böhme U, Sanders M, Reid AJ, Cotton JA, Maiga-Ascofare O, et al. Plasmodium malariae and P ovale genomes provide insights into malaria parasite evolution. Nature. 2017;542:101–4.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. Flück C, Smith T, Beck HP, Irion A, Betuela I, Alpers MP, et al. Strain-specific humoral response to a polymorphic malaria vaccine. Infect Immun. 2004;72:6300–5.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Franks S, Baton L, Tetteh K, Tongren E, Dewin D, Akanmori BD, et al. Genetic diversity and antigenic polymorphism in Plasmodium falciparum: extensive serological cross-reactivity between allelic variants of merozoite surface protein 2. Infect Immun. 2003;71:3485–95.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  29. Osier FH, Polley SD, Mwangi T, Lowe B, Conway DJ, Marsh K. Naturally acquired antibodies to polymorphic and conserved epitopes of Plasmodium falciparum merozoite surface protein 3. Parasite Immunol. 2007;29:387–94.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  30. Blackman MJ, Heidrich HG, Donachie S, McBride JS, Holder AA. A single fragment of a malaria merozoite surface protein remains on the parasite during red cell invasion and is the target of invasion-inhibiting antibodies. J Exp Med. 1990;172:379–82.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  31. Gowda DC. TLR-mediated cell signaling by malaria GPIs. Trends Parasitol. 2007;23:596–604.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  32. Ferreira MU, Kimura EA, De Souza JM, Katzin AM. The isotype composition and avidity of naturally acquired anti-Plasmodium falciparum antibodies: differential patterns in clinically immune Africans and Amazonian patients. Am J Trop Med Hyg. 1996;55:315–23.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We thank all study participants, local health officials and doctors for their participation and support.

Funding

This study was funded by grants from the National Natural Science Foundation of China (81601787, 81871681), by the Natural Science Foundation of Jiangsu Province (BK20160192, BK20150001), by the Jiangsu Provincial Key Research and Development Program (BE2016631), by the Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities funded by the Ministry of Education of China (JUSRP51710A), by the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation (OPP1161962), by the national first-class discipline program of Food Science and Technology (JUFSTR20180101), and by the Jiangsu Provincial Project of Invigorating Health Care through Science, Technology and Education.

Availability of data and materials

The data supporting the conclusions of this article are included within the article and its additional files. The newly generated sequences were submitted in the GenBank database under the accession numbers MK629721 and MK629720.

Authors’ contributions

YC and YHX conceived this study. XXZ designed the research protocol and wrote the manuscript. SX, JXT, JC and GDZ collected the samples. XXZ, RLC and LMC performed the acquisition of data and data analysis. XXZ, RLC, HTF and YHX conducted the laboratory work, data handling and analysis and reviewed the manuscript. HTF, ETH, XDS and YHL contributed to interpretation of the results and assisted in writing the manuscript. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Ethics approval and consent to participate

This study was approved by the Ethics Committee, Jiangsu Provincial Key Laboratory on Parasite and Vector Control Technology, Jiangsu Institute of Parasitic Diseases (JIPD) (IRB00004221), Wuxi, China. Informed consent was obtained from all of the participants, and the animal trial was approved by the Animal Ethics Committee, Jiangnan University (JN. no. 20180330b0480604).

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Author information

Author notes

  1. Xinxin Zhang and Ruilin Chu contributed equally to this work

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Laboratory of Pathogen Infection and Immunity, Department of Public Health and Preventive Medicine, Wuxi School of Medicine, Jiangnan University, Wuxi, Jiangsu, People’s Republic of China

    Xinxin Zhang, Ruilin Chu, Haitian Fu, Limei Chen, Xiaodan Shi, Yuhong Li, Yinghua Xuan, Jun Cao & Yang Cheng

  2. Key Laboratory of National Health and Family Planning Commission on Parasitic Disease Control and Prevention, Jiangsu Provincial Key Laboratory on Parasite and Vector Control Technology, Jiangsu Institute of Parasite Diseases, Wuxi, Jiangsu, People’s Republic of China

    Sui Xu, Jianxia Tang, Jing Chen, Guoding Zhu & Jun Cao

  3. Department of Medical Environmental Biology and Tropical Medicine, School of Medicine, Kangwon National University, Chuncheon, Gangwon-do, Republic of Korea

    Eun-Taek Han

Authors
  1. Xinxin Zhang
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Ruilin Chu
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Sui Xu
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Haitian Fu
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Jianxia Tang
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. Limei Chen
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  7. Xiaodan Shi
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  8. Jing Chen
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  9. Yuhong Li
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  10. Guoding Zhu
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  11. Eun-Taek Han
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  12. Yinghua Xuan
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  13. Jun Cao
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  14. Yang Cheng
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to Yinghua Xuan, Jun Cao or Yang Cheng.

Additional files

Additional file 1: Table S1.

Information on imported P. ovale curtisi and P. ovale wallikeri.

Additional file 2: Figure S1.

Amino acid sequence alignment of P. ovale MSP-8 full length. a P. ovale curtisi. b P. ovale wallikeri.

Additional file 3: Table S2.

The msp8 Gene ID number of other Plasmodium species.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Zhang, X., Chu, R., Xu, S. et al. Immunogenicity analysis of genetically conserved segments in Plasmodium ovale merozoite surface protein-8. Parasites Vectors 12, 164 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1186/s13071-019-3412-0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s13071-019-3412-0

Keywords

Parasites & Vectors

ISSN: 1756-3305

Contact us