Skip to main content

Parasite fauna of wild Antillean manatees (Trichechus manatus manatus) of the Andean Region, Colombia



Antillean manatees (Trichechus manatus manatus) are large herbivorous aquatic mammals living in limited areas of South, Central and North America. As with other aquatic mammals, Antillean manatees can be infected by a variety of protozoan and metazoan parasites, some of them with zoonotic potential, which affect not only their welfare but also population health status. Therefore, we conducted the first epidemiological survey in Colombian free-ranging Antillean manatees to estimate their actual gastrointestinal parasite status.


In total, 69 faecal samples were collected from free-ranging individual manatees during ecology field studies in the rivers Carare and San Juan and in two associated wetlands in the Andean region of Colombia. Parasite diversity encompassed six different endoparasite species. The highest prevalence was found for protozoan infections with Eimeria nodulosa (47.8%) and Eimeria manatus-like species (type A, B; 43.4%), followed by Entamoeba sp. (14.49%) and Giardia sp. (1.4%) infections. In addition, infections with the trematode Chiorchis fabaceus were detected at a high prevalence (33.3%). Molecular characterization of sirenian Eimeria species led to the distinction of three species, E. nodulosa and two E. manatus-like species (type A, B). Phylogenetic analyses indicated a host-specific adaptation of sirenian Eimeria species as previously reported for Eimeria species from other mammalian hosts.


This study provides the first record of Antillean manatee infection with Giardia and Entamoeba species in Colombia, representing two important anthropozoonotic parasite genera. This survey should serve as a baseline investigation for future monitoring on parasitic zoonoses in this mammal and encourage for investigations on their impact on both public health and wild manatee welfare.


The Antillean manatee (Trichechus manatus manatus) is the only sirenis, which ranges from the northeast of South America through the Caribbean Sea up to Mexico. It inhabits costal, freshwater fluvial and wetland environments in Colombia [1, 2]. In contrast to other aquatic/marine mammals, which all exhibit carnivorous/piscivorous diets, sirenians are considered as pure herbivorous species. In Colombia, Antillean manatees reside in the Orinoco and the Caribbean basins with the Magdalena riparian system representing the largest habitat area with the highest capture [1,2,3,4]. The Antillean manatee is listed as a seriously endangered species in Colombia experiencing a threatening population decrease according to the International Union for the Conservation of the Nature (IUCN) [1, 5]. The latest assessment referred to a population of approximately 500 animals left in these Colombian regions [6].

There are several reports highlighting the devastating impact of anthropogenic and environmental pressure on wild manatee populations due to hunting activities [1, 2], watercraft collisions [5, 7,8,9,10,11], sewage pollution, brevetoxicosis, [12,13,14,15], accidental death in fishing nets [16] and loss of natural habitats [1]. Unfortunately, the Colombian wild manatee populations are still exposed to all these adverse factors and therefore urgently require ongoing national protection measures. Besides the factors mentioned above, parasitoses also have a critical impact on wildlife population health, including that of aquatic mammals [17,18,19,20], and data on actual infections are needed to assess environmental risk factors for endangered species [21]. As such, monitoring studies will allow gaining an improved knowledge on pathogen diversity and relevance for manatee welfare, on a potential spillover of human parasites and on parasite reservoirs [20]. All these aspects are important, not only for conservation purposes, but also for the preservation of important ecological dynamics and human health protection.

So far, several reports on metazoan and protozoan parasites of manatees from different geographical regions have been published [4, 11, 22,23,24,25,26,27,28]. Nonetheless, detailed knowledge on manatee parasites, i.e. their biology, epidemiology, pathogenesis and immunity, is still limited and restricted to studies on captive animals or carcasses [4, 11, 29]. Consequently, these parasitological reports may not necessarily reflect true parasite diversity of manatee populations living within their natural habitats. Few investigations have been performed on South American wild manatee populations due to the elusive behaviour of these animals and the turbid waters they inhabit [21, 30, 31]. Overall, the implementation of ‘non-invasive’ sampling techniques (e.g. by collecting faeces, vomitus, expirations), of photographic records in combination with sonar-based manatee tracing [32] and of molecular approaches [21], may not only contribute to improve sampling efficacy but will also change the scope of future parasitological studies on manatees within natural ecosystems. Whilst there are vast amounts of molecular data available for parasites affecting terrestrial mammals, there is still a lack of molecular analyses on parasites occurring in wild manatees. Currently, sequences from only three helminth species of manatees are available [21, 33]. The option to identify and characterize parasite diversity via DNA amplification from faeces, nasal/ocular secretions and tissue samples opens a wide range of future tasks that may help to protect this unique mammal.

The present study represents the first large-scale survey on gastrointestinal parasites of wild, living and free-ranging Antillean manatees (n = 69) in Colombia and provides first report of the genus Entamoeba in sirenians in South America. Furthermore, it adds a novel molecular characterization on monoxenous Eimeria species infecting these endangered aquatic mammals.


Parasite infections

Overall, 72% (50/69) of Antillean manatees were infected with at least one parasite species (Table 1). In total, six different gastrointestinal parasite species belonging to protozoan and metazoan taxa were diagnosed. Five different protozoan and one metazoan parasitic stages (i.e. cysts, oocysts and eggs) were detected. Metazoan parasites were represented by one trematode species (Chiorchis fabaceus). No stages of cestodes, nematodes or acanthocephalans were found in manatee faecal samples. A list of known parasitic stages and respective prevalences from manatees is presented in Additional file 1: Table S1. In addition, selected illustrations of parasitic stages are given in Fig. 1.

Table 1 Prevalence of parasites in wild Antillean manatees (T. manatus manatus) (n = 69) from the Carare River, Santander
Fig. 1

Illustration of manatee gastrointestinal parasites. a Eimeria manatus-like oocyst, b Eimeria nodulosa oocyst, c Entamoeba sp. cyst, d Chiorchis fabaceus egg. Scale-bars: a, c, d 20 µm; b 10 µm

The most prevalent parasitic stages were oocysts of Eimeria nodulosa (47.8%; Fig. 1b), followed by Eimeria manatus-like oocysts (43.4%; Fig. 1a), eggs of C. fabaceus (33.3%; Fig. 1d) and cysts of Entamoeba sp. (14.5%; Fig. 1c). One faecal sample proved positive for Giardia antigen (1.4%) in coproantigen-ELISA. None of the identified parasites revealed as core species (prevalence > 50%) and the diplomonadid protozoan Giardia sp. was found as component species (prevalence < 10%). Two parasite genera have anthropozoonotic potential, namely Entamoeba and Giardia.

Referring to parasite genus level, the present findings include one new host record on Entamoeba for Antillean manatees (T. manatus manatus) in South America. In addition, giardiasis has not previously been reported to occur in Colombian manatees.

Overall, two water-borne parasitic infections (i.e. giardiasis and entamoebiasis), one gastropod-borne disease (chiorchiosis) and two monoxenous infections (coccidiosis) were detected in this epidemiological survey.

Morphometric and morphological analyses of coccidian oocysts and trematode eggs revealed the following data: E. nodulosa oocysts had a mean size of 12.55 × 11.72 (7.0–14.9 × 7.2–13.97) µm and showed characteristic knob-like structures on the surface (Fig. 1b). Scanning electron microscopy (SEM) analyses illustrated these knob-like structures in more detail (Fig. 2). E. manatus-like oocysts [9.82 × 9.24 (8.9–11.95 × 8.0–11.31) µm] were slightly smaller than E. nodulosa oocysts and lacked any knob-like structures on oocyst wall. SEM analyses showed a micropyle-like cap structure in the E. manatus-like oocysts (data not shown). Interestingly, such a structure was not reported before for manatee-specific oocysts [25, 26]. Entamoeba sp. cysts had a mean size of 14.19 × 12.0 (10.45–18.57 × 8.17–15.89) µm and presented at least more than two spherical nuclei (Fig. 1c). Chiorchis fabaceus eggs had a mean size of 151 × 111 (139–157 × 99–133) µm, an ovoid shape, a unipolar operculum and a brownish morula being delimited by a smooth capsule (Fig. 2d). All these morphological characteristics agree with previous descriptions [25].

Fig. 2

Scanning electron microscopy (SEM) image of a Eimeria nodulosa oocyst. Scale-bar: 5 µm

Molecular analyses of Eimeria species

In total, 62% (43/69) of Antillean manatee faecal samples contained Eimeria oocysts, which were diagnosed morphologically as E. nodulosa and E. manatus-like species. A subset of samples (n = 17) with single and mixed Eimeria oocyst specimen was characterized molecularly by copro-PCR and consecutive sequencing of the almost entire SSU rDNA. Overall, three different Eimeria sequences were identified with an interspecies identity of 98.3–98.7% (Fig. 3, partial alignment). The highest homology obtained by BLAST search of the GenBank database was related to Eimeria sequences from rodents showing 96–97% identity. Out of the phylogeny DNA sequences, one could directly be assigned to E. nodulosa based on microscopic diagnostics on samples showing mono-infections with E. nodulosa. The remaining two sequences corresponded to E. manatus-like oocysts. These appear to represent two distinct Eimeria species (designated here as E. manatus-like type A and B) which were indistinguishable on the level of oocyst morphology. The partial SSU rRNA gene sequences of E. nodulosa and the two E. manatus-like species were deposited in the GenBank database under the accession numbers MG652357–MG652359.

Fig. 3

Alignment of Eimeria nodulosa, Eimeria manatus-like type A, Eimeria manatus-like type B, E. tamiasciuri (squirrel) and E. wyomingensis (bovines) SSU rRNA gene sequences. Positions with identical nucleotides in all five sequences are denoted by a star; positions with more than 50% agreement are highlighted by black shading

A simplified phylogenetic tree showing representative Eimeria species from bovines, rodents and chickens was generated based on BLAST search data including manatee Eimeria sequences (Fig. 4). Statistical analyses from series of likelihood-ratio tests obtained in MrModeltest v.2 [34] allowed to select SYM+G as the most appropriate mathematical model for our phylogenetic analysis which was carried out using MrBayes v.3.2 [35]. The Bayesian maximum posterior probability tree with corresponding clade-credibility values is shown in Fig. 4. The inferred phylogenetic tree revealed a host-specific adaptation of the sirenian Eimeria species as also shown for Eimeria species from the other host groups. The closest neighbour to the cluster of sirenian Eimeria species was represented by the rodent lineage.

Fig. 4

Phylogenetic tree showing the three Eimeria species identified in Antillean manatees from Colombia. The tree shows that Eimeria spp. from manatees also present host-grouping pattern compared with other Eimeria spp. from bovines, rodents and chicken. Cystoisospora canis was used as the outgroup


Overall, manatees were infected with five different intestinal protozoan parasites (i.e. E. nodulosa, E. manatus-like type A and B, Entamoeba sp. and Giardia sp.) and one intestinal trematode parasite, i. e. C. fabaceus. Thus, manatees were found to be infected with E. nodulosa (47.8%), E. manatus-like specimens (43.4%), Entamoeba sp. (14.5%) and C. fabaceus (33.3%). Giardia sp. revealed as a component species (prevalence < 10%), which is in agreement with previous published data [31].

In the present study, Eimeria spp. revealed as the most prevalent parasites and these findings are in agreement with data on manatees inhabiting Florida and Puerto Rico (Additional file 1: Table S1) [25, 36]. DNA sequencing-based analyses identified three Eimeria species in Colombian manatee samples, i.e. E. nodulosa and two E. manatus-like species. Although microscopic analyses revealed smaller sizes of E. manatus-like oocysts when compared to measures recently reported for E. manatus [25], the present size characteristics almost matched those described elsewhere [37]. Based on oocyst size we could also exclude the presence of E. trichechi, which was described in T. inunguis in Brazil [24].

Interestingly, the Antillean manatee population studied here was found to be infected with only one trematode species, i.e. C. fabaceus, thereby showing a different trematode spectrum than Antillean manatees from Córdoba, Colombia, which had Nudacotyle undicola infections [21]. This might be due to the relative geographical separation of the different manatee populations. Consistently, the Carare River is localized between the Andes Mountains of Colombia and therefore far away from shores of the Atlantic Ocean where other wild Antillean manatees reside. Trematodes have indirect life-cycles and need adequate gastropod intermediate hosts to fulfil their development. Therefore, the presence or absence of specific molluscs (snails/slugs) represents a further factor for trematode diversity in manatees. However, the current lack of knowledge on epidemiology, transmission and pathogenicity of almost all parasitoses of manatees impair the establishment of proper international and national conservation politics. Indeed, the pathogenicity of manatee intestinal trematode infections, e.g. nudacotylosis, could be of importance, especially for this studied isolated manatee population which may be naïve for different manatee-specific trematode infections [25]. Additionally, the probability of a low genetic diversity in confined and remote manatee populations, a product of inbreeding, may impair the host immune system, rendering manatees more susceptible to disease as demonstrated for other wild animals [38,39,40].

The present parasitological findings represent the first host record for Entamoeba sp. in T. manatus manatus in South America (prevalence: 14.5%). So far, neither the species nor the zoonotic potential of this pathogen is known. To our best knowledge, Entamoeba infections in aquatic mammals have so far only been reported in certain whale species such as sperm whales, blue whales, fin whales and sei whales [41], and there is one report for manatees [36]. Nonetheless, the Entamoeba-like cysts reported in Florida manatees [36] present a larger size and differ in the number and form of the nuclei. Therefore, future parasitological research in manatees requires a broader approach, e.g. incorporating molecular analysis [21, 33]. In general, Entamoeba spp. are water-borne parasites and their transmission commonly occur in developing countries where drinking water quality is poor and open water often is contaminated by human faeces, which are still used as a fertilizer [42]. Besides some non-pathogenic species, such as E. coli, E. hartmanni and E. polecki [43], the genus Entamoeba also includes the worldwide occurring species E. histolytica which is considered as one of the major causes of human deaths induced by parasitic pathogens [44]. As such, contamination of water and shores with human faeces might pose a risk on local manatee health. Additionally, one Giardia antigen-positive Antillean manatee was identified in the present study thereby representing, to our best knowledge, the first report for Colombia. Alongside this, there is only one other report on giardiasis in manatees from Brazil [31]. Giardia spp. are also considered as water-borne zoonotic parasites which are transmitted by highly resistant cysts which are orally ingested by hosts [20]. Given that no cyst stages were detected in the antigen-positive animal one may question an active infection and thereby the zoonotic potential of this positive sample. In fact, we cannot exclude that Giardia stages were simply representing intestinal passers-by.

As also tackled in the present study, water-borne zoonoses clearly need more attention by public health authorities worldwide as suggested elsewhere [45]. A fundamental aspect of entamoebiasis/giardiasis control is to identify reservoirs and routes of transmission in diverse climatic and geographical areas. This is highly important in the case of wild Antillean manatees, considering that this species inhabits shallow waters close to populated marine shores which renders them highly vulnerable to classical water-borne parasitic infections [23, 30, 46].


The present study adds novel data on clearly neglected anthropozoonotic parasitoses [44, 47] and calls for more integrated investigation to avoid exposure of Antillean manatees or human beings to these intestinal pathogens. It is of particular importance to strengthen interdisciplinary health agendas which favour ‘One Health’ concept considering ecosystem, domestic animal, wild animal and human health as a single unit [47,48,49,50]. This study emphasizes the relevance of the sentinel role of manatees [51] and the regular manatee monitoring programmes being supported by both Colombian authorities for public health issues and biologists/ecologists responsible for conservation programmes.


Study area, sample collection and coprological analyses

Wild Antillean manatees (T. manatus manatus) inhabiting river-, swamp- and wetland-waters within the Andean region of the Santander Department of Colombia were sampled. The study area has an average annual precipitation of 2955 mm and a temperature range between 26.8 and 30.3 °C. Faecal samples were collected during dry and rainy seasons of the years 2015 and 2016. In detail, a boat-based line transect survey was conducted to search for faecal samples along the banks and floating plant patches in the San Juan River, the San Juana swamp and in the Carare river basin. In total, 69 individual faecal samples were collected by tracing individual animals during boat excursions according to the Guidelines for the Treatment of Marine Mammals in Field Research of the Society for Marine Mammalogy. Whenever defecation occurred, floating faecal samples were immediately collected from water surfaces or from floating vegetation patches using a net (Fig. 5). Thereafter, faecal samples were transferred into 10-ml plastic tubes (Sarstedt, Nümbrecht, Germany) containing 70% ethanol for fixation and stored at 4 °C until further diagnosis. This survey comprised a total of 130 boat trips covering a distance of 585 km and resulted in 288 h of sampling effort.

Fig. 5

Illustration of sampling sites and specimen: a Carare River in the Andean region; b “Cienaga La San Juana”, a wetland ecosystem; c, d manatee faeces in field; e manatee sighting

For parasitological examination, faecal samples of manatees were submitted and analysed using Sheather’s sedimentation, flotation (SSF)-technique [52] and the standard sodium acetate acetic formalin (SAF)-technique modified with ethyl acetate [53]. Whilst the SSF-technique was applied for trematode egg diagnosis, the SAF-technique was used for detection of helminth eggs and protozoan stages (trophozoites, cysts, sporocysts, oocysts). Samples were analysed by light microscopy (BH-52® microscope equipped with a SC30® digital camera, both Olympus, Hamburg, Germany) and CellSens® imaging software (Olympus) for illustration (Fig. 1) and specimen measurements. Additionally, carbol-fuchsin-stained faecal smears were performed for Cryptosporidium spp. oocyst detection [53, 54]. As shown for other marine mammals [41, 55,56,57], coproantigen-ELISAs (ProSpecTTM, Thermo ScientificTM, Schwerte, Germany) were applied to detect Cryptosporidium and Giardia antigens in manatee faecal samples.

Molecular analyses

Amplification of Eimeria-specific DNA via PCR and amplicon sequencing was performed to characterize Eimeria oocysts in manatee faecal samples (n = 17) and to elucidate phylogenetic relationships.

DNA extraction of Eimeria-oocysts from faecal samples

DNA was extracted from faecal samples using a QIAamp DNA Stool Mini kit® (Qiagen, Hilden, Germany) following glass bead homogenization [58]. First, the ethanol used for sample preservation was removed through evaporation by opening the collection tubes at room temperature for 30 min. Then, 6 ml of ASL buffer (Stool lysis buffer, QIAamp DNA Stool Mini kit®) and 30 sterile glass beads (4 mm diameter, Carl Roth, Karlsruhe, Germany) were added to 1 g of faeces. Samples were mixed by horizontal vortexing (Vortex Genie 2®, Scientific Industries Inc, New York, USA; equipped with a 13000-V1-15 adapter, MO BIO Labs, Qiagen, Hilden, Germany) and incubated at 70 °C for 15 min. Afterwards, samples (2 ml) were transferred to a reaction tube (Eppendorf, Berzdorf, Germany), incubated at 95 °C for 10 min and then pelleted (14,000× rpm, 1 min). Subsequently, an InhibitEX Tablet® (Qiagen) was added to 1.2 ml of the supernatant. DNA isolation was then performed according to the manufacturer’s protocol.

Eimeria-specific PCR, cloning and sequencing

Eimeria-specific primers were used in a nested PCR, namely, TK2: 5′-GGT TGA TCC TGC CAG TAG TC-3′ and ETS2: 5′-AAT CCC AAT GAA CGC GAC TCA-3′ for PCR1 and TK1: 5′-AGT AGT CAT ATG CTT GTC TC-3′ together with 18S-14R: 5′-ACG GAA ACC GTG TTA CGA CT-3′ for PCR2, according to [59]. The nested PCR produced a fragment (~1800 bp) of the small subunit ribosomal DNA (SSU rDNA). For PCR1, the reaction volume of 50 µl contained 0.2 µM of each primer (TK2, ETS2), 10 µl of 5× HOT FIREPol Blend Master Mix with 7.5 mM MgCl2 (Solis BioDyne, Tartu, Estonia) and 5 µl of copro-DNA template. The cycling programme was: 95 °C for 15 min (initial denaturation) followed by 30 cycles of 95 °C (20 s, denaturation), 67 °C decreasing 1 °C per cycle until 60 °C (30 s, annealing) and finally 72 °C for 2 min 30 s. For PCR2, 2 µl of amplificate (PCR1) was used as a template using the following conditions: 95 °C for 15 min (initial denaturation), followed by 35 cycles of 95 °C, 20 s (denaturation), 56 °C for 30 s (annealing) and 72 °C for 2 min. PCR-derived DNA samples were analysed in a 1% agarose gel. Subsequently, DNA-amplicons were purified from a preparative agarose gel (1%) using HiYield® Gel/PCR DNA Extraction Kit (Süd-Laborbedarf, Gauting, Germany). Afterwards, the amplicons were cloned into pDrive vector (Qiagen) and the isolated recombinant plasmid DNA with amplicons was sequenced in both directions by LGC Genomics (Berlin, Germany).

Phylogenetic analysis on manatee Eimeria spp.

The SSU rDNA sequence-based phylogenetic analysis was conducted using a reduced dataset. Nine Eimeria sequences (Fig. 4) from three different host groups (bovines, rodents and chickens) were selected after BLAST search in GenBank. Cystoisospora canis was chosen as the outgroup-member to prove the monophyly of the ingroup-members. Sequences were aligned using ClustalX v.2.1 software [60] and the alignment was corrected manually. For phylogenetic analyses, the best-fit models of sequence evolution were determined with JModelTest v.2.1.10 [61, 62] and MrModeltest v.2 [34] software applying Akaike’s criterion. For maximum likelihood (ML) and Bayesian inference (BI) analyses, the following methods were used: ML analysis was performed using PhyML v.3.0 software [62] using the TIM3 + I + G model. BI analysis was conducted using MrBayes v.3.2 software [35] applying a SYM+G model for 20,000 generations. Burn-in was determined according to the indications implemented in the MrBayes software [deviation of split frequencies below 0.01, a potential scale reduction factor (PSRF) close to 1.0 for all parameters]. The phylogenetic trees were visualized in FigTree v.1.4.3 software [63] and adjusted using Adobe Illustrator CS5 v.15.0 (Adobe Systems Inc., San Jose, USA).

Scanning electron microscopy (SEM) of sirenian Eimeria oocysts

Droplets of Eimeria spp. oocyst-positive faecal samples were deposited on circular, poly-L-lysine (Merck, Darmstadt, Germany) pre-coated glass coverslips (10 mm diameter; Nunc). Thereafter, samples were fixed in 2.5% glutaraldehyde (Merck), post-fixed in 1% osmium tetroxide (Merck), washed in distilled water, dehydrated, dried by CO2 treatment and afterwards sputtered with gold particles as described for faecal probes of other marine mammals [64]. SEM samples were analysed using an XL30® scanning electron microscope (Philips, Hillsboro, USA) at the Institute of Anatomy and Cell Biology, Justus Liebig University Giessen, Germany.



sodium acetate acetic acid formalin


enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay


small-subunit ribosomal RNA gene


International Union for the Conservation of the Nature


polymerase chain reaction


deoxyribonucleic acid


ribosomal deoxyribonucleic acid


ribosomal ribonucleic acid


scanning electron microscopy


Wildlife Conservation Society


Corporación Autónoma Regional de Santander


  1. 1.

    Trujillo F, Gartner A, Caicedo D. Diagnóstico del estado de conocimiento y conservación de los mamíferos acuáticos en Colombia. Bogota: Ministerio de Ambiente y Desarrollo Sostenible FO, Conservación Internacional y WWF; 2013.

    Google Scholar 

  2. 2.

    Montoya-Ospina RA, Caicedo-Herrera D, Millán-Sánchez SL, Mignucci-Giannoni AA, Lefebvre LW. Status and distribution of the West Indian manatee, Trichechus manatus manatus, in Colombia. Biol Conserv. 2001;102:117–29.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. 3.

    Bertram G, Bertram CR. The modern Sirenia: their distribution and status. Biol J Linn Soc. 1973;5:297–338.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. 4.

    Beck C, Forrester DJ. Helminths of the Florida manatee, Trichechus manatus latirostris, with a discussion and summary of the parasites of sirenians. J Parasitol. 1988;74:628–37.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  5. 5.

    Deutsch C, Self-Sullivan C, Mignucci-Giannoni A. Trichechus manatus. The IUCN Red List of Threatened Species. Version 2014.2. 2008. Accessed 3 Nov 2018.

  6. 6.

    Quintana-Rizzo E, Reynolds J. Regional management plan for the West Indian manatee (Trichechus manatus). Gosier, Guadeloupe, France: Caribbean Environment Programme, United Nations Environment Programme; 2008.

    Google Scholar 

  7. 7.

    O’Shea TJ, Beck CA, Bonde RK, Kochman HI, Odell DK. An analysis of manatee mortality patterns in Florida, 1976–1981. J Wildlife Manag. 1985;49:1–11.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. 8.

    Dierauf L, Gulland FM. CRC handbook of marine mammal medicine: health, disease, and rehabilitation. Boca Raton: CRC Press; 2001.

    Google Scholar 

  9. 9.

    Gomes Borges JC, Câmara Alves L, Gloria Faustino MAD. Criptosporidiose: uma revisão sobre a sua implicação na conservação dos mamíferos aquáticos. Biota Neotrop. 2007;7:3.

    Google Scholar 

  10. 10.

    Bossart GD. The Florida manatee: on the verge of extinction? J Am Vet Med Assoc. 1999;214:1178–83.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. 11.

    Mignucci-Giannoni AA, Williams EH, Toyos-González GM, Pérez-Padilla J, Rodrı́guez-López MA, Vega-Guerra MB, et al. Helminths from a stranded manatee in the Dominican Republic. Vet Parasitol. 1999;81:69–71.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  12. 12.

    Bossart GD, Baden DG, Ewing RY, Roberts B, Wright SD. Brevetoxicosis in manatees (Trichechus manatus latirostris) from the 1996 epizootic: gross, histologic, and immunohistochemical features. Toxicol Pathol. 1998;26:276–82.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  13. 13.

    O’Shea TJ, Rathbun GB, Bonde RK, Buergelt CD, Odell DK. An epizootic of Florida manatees associated with a dinoflagellate bloom. Mar Mammal Sci. 1991;7:165–79.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. 14.

    Flewelling LJ, Naar JP, Abbott JP, Baden DG, Barros NB, Bossart GD, et al. Brevetoxicosis: red tides and marine mammal mortalities. Nature. 2005;435:755–6.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  15. 15.

    Landsberg J, Flewelling L, Naar J. Karenia brevis red tides, brevetoxins in the food web, and impacts on natural resources: decadal advancements. Harmful Algae. 2009;8:598–607.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  16. 16.

    Castelblanco-Martínez DN, Bermúdez-Romero AL, Gómez-Camelo IV, Rosas FCW, Trujillo F, Zerda-Ordoñez E. Seasonality of habitat use, mortality and reproduction of the vulnerable Antillean manatee Trichechus manatus manatus in the Orinoco River, Colombia: implications for conservation. Oryx. 2009;43:235–42.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. 17.

    Hudson PJ, Dobson AP, Newborn D. Do parasites make prey vulnerable to predation? Red grouse and parasites. J Anim Ecol. 1992;61:681–92.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. 18.

    Daszak P, Cunningham AA, Hyatt AD. Emerging infectious diseases of wildlife–threats to biodiversity and human health. Science. 2000;287:443.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  19. 19.

    Møller AP, Nielsen JT. Malaria and risk of predation: a comparative study of birds. Ecology. 2007;88:871–81.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. 20.

    Thompson R, Lymbery A, Smith A. Parasites, emerging disease and wildlife conservation. Int J Parasitol. 2010;40:1163–70.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  21. 21.

    Vélez J, Hirzmann J, Lange M, Chaparro-Gutiérrez J, Taubert A, Hermosilla C. Occurrence of endoparasites in wild Antillean manatees (Trichechus manatus manatus) in Colombia. Int J Parasitol Parasites Wildl. 2018;7:54–7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. 22.

    Bonde RK, Oʼshea T, Beck C. Manual of procedures for the salvage and necropsy of carcasses of the West Indian manatee (Trichechus manatus). Springfield, Virginia, USA: National Technical Information Service; 1983.

    Google Scholar 

  23. 23.

    Bossart GD, Mignucci-Giannoni AA, Rivera-Guzman AL, Jimenez-Marrero NM, Camus AC, Bonde RK, et al. Disseminated toxoplasmosis in Antillean manatees Trichechus manatus manatus from Puerto Rico. Dis Aquat Organ. 2012;101:139–44.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. 24.

    Lainson R, Naiff R, Best R, Shaw J. Eimeria trichechi n. sp. from the Amazonian manatee, Trichechus inunguis (Mammalia: Sirenia). Syst Parasitol. 1983;5:287–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. 25.

    Bando M, Larkin IV, Wright SD, Greiner EC. Diagnostic stages of the parasites of the Florida manatee, Trichechus manatus latirostris. J Parasitol. 2014;100:133–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. 26.

    Upton SJ, Odell DK, Bossart GD, Walsh MT. Description of the oocysts of two new species of Eimeria (Apicomplexa: Eimerüdae) from the Florida manatee, Trichechus manatus (Sirenia: Trichechidae). J Protozool. 1989;36:87–90.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. 27.

    Carvalho V, Meirelles A, Motta M, Maia D, Campello M, Bevilaqua C. Occurrence of Pulmonicola cochleotrema (syn. Cochleotrema cochleotrema) (Digenea: Opisthotrematidae) in Antillean manatees (Trichechus manatus manatus) in Brazil. Lat Am J Aquat Mamm. 2009;7:47–52.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. 28.

    Hernández-Olascoaga A, Olivera-Gómez LD, Morales-Vela B. Helmintos parásitos en heces de manatí Antillano Trichechus manatus manatus (Sirenia: Tricheachidae) en México: Golfo de México y Caribe. Hidrobiológica. 2017;27:39–44.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. 29.

    Colón-Llavina MM, Mignucci-Giannoni AA, Mattiucci S, Paoletti M, Nascetti G, Williams EH. Additional records of metazoan parasites from Caribbean marine mammals, including genetically identified anisakid nematodes. Parasitol Res. 2009;105:1239.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. 30.

    Borges JCG, Alves LC, da Gloria Faustino MA, Marmontel M. Occurrence of Cryptosporidium spp. in Antillean manatees (Trichechus manatus) and Amazonian manatees (Trichechus inunguis) from Brazil. J Zoo Wildl Med. 2011;42:593–6.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. 31.

    Borges JCG, dos Santos Lima D, da Silva EM, de Oliveira Moreira AL, Marmontel M, Carvalho VL, et al. Cryptosporidium spp. and Giardia sp. in aquatic mammals in northern and northeastern Brazil. Dis Aquat Organ. 2017;126:25–31.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. 32.

    Buaka Muanke P, Niezrecki C. Locating manatee position with an acoustic array. J Acoust Soc Am. 2006;119:3405.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. 33.

    Nadler SA, Hudspeth DS. Ribosomal DNA and phylogeny of the Ascaridoidea (Nemata: Secernentea): implications for morphological evolution and classification. Mol Phylogenet Evol. 1998;10:221–36.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  34. 34.

    Nylander JAA. MrModeltest 2.3. Program distributed by the author. Evolutionary Biology Centre, Uppsala University. 2004. Accessed 2 Mar 2018.

  35. 35.

    Ronquist F, Huelsenbeck J, Teslenko M. Draft MrBayes version 3.2 manual: tutorials and model summaries. 2011. Accessed 22 Feb 2018.

  36. 36.

    Wyrosdick H, Chapman A, Mignucci-Giannoni AA, Rivera-Pérez CI, Bonde RK. Internal parasites of the two subspecies of the West Indian manatee Trichechus manatus. Dis Aquat Organ. 2018;130:145–52.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. 37.

    Wyrosdick HL. Epidemiology of Toxoplasma gondii and a survey of other parasites in the West Indian manatee (Trichechus manatus). 2016. Accessed 12 Jan 2018.

  38. 38.

    Hale K, Briskie J. Decreased immunocompetence in a severely bottlenecked population of an endemic New Zealand bird. Anim Conser. 2007;10:2–10.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  39. 39.

    Pedersen AB, Jones KE, Nunn CL, Altizer S. Infectious diseases and extinction risk in wild mammals. Conser Biol. 2007;21:1269–79.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  40. 40.

    Peeler EJ, Oidtmann BC, Midtlyng PJ, Miossec L, Gozlan RE. Non-native aquatic animals introductions have driven disease emergence in Europe. Biol Invasions. 2011;13:1291–303.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  41. 41.

    Hermosilla C, Silva LM, Kleinertz S, Prieto R, Silva MA, Taubert A. Endoparasite survey of free-swimming baleen whales (Balaenoptera musculus, B. physalus, B. borealis) and sperm whales (Physeter macrocephalus) using non/minimally invasive methods. Parasitol Res. 2016;115:889–96.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  42. 42.

    Marshall MM, Naumovitz D, Ortega Y, Sterling CR. Waterborne protozoan pathogens. Clin Microbiol Rev. 1997;10:67–85.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  43. 43.

    Matsubayashi M, Kanamori K, Sadahiro M, Tokoro M, Abe N, Haritani M, et al. First molecular identification of Entamoeba polecki in a piglet in Japan and implications for aggravation of ileitis by coinfection with Lawsonia intracellularis. Parasitol Res. 2015;114:3069–73.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  44. 44.

    Salles JM, Salles MJ, Moraes LA, Silva MC. Invasive amebiasis: an update on diagnosis and management. Expert Rev Anti Infect Ther. 2007;5:893–901.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  45. 45.

    Ponce-Gordo F. Jirků-Pomajbíková, K. Balantidium coli. Global water pathogen project part three. specific excreted pathogens: environmental and epidemiology aspects. 2017. Accessed 16 Aug 2018.

  46. 46.

    Jones J, Dubey J. Waterborne toxoplasmosis - recent developments. Exp Parasitol. 2010;124:10–25.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  47. 47.

    Thompson RA. Parasite zoonoses and wildlife: one health, spillover and human activity. Int J Parasitol. 2013;43:1079–88.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  48. 48.

    Schwabe CW. Cattle, priests, and progress in medicine. Minneapolis, Minnesota, USA: University of Minnesota Press; 1978.

    Google Scholar 

  49. 49.

    Cook R, Karesh W, Osofsky S. The Manhattan principles on ‘One World One Health’. One World, One Health: building interdisciplinary bridges to health in a globalized world. New York: Wildlife Conservation Society; 2004.

    Google Scholar 

  50. 50.

    Schurer J, Mosites E, Li C, Meschke S, Rabinowitz P. Community-based surveillance of zoonotic parasites in a ‘One Health’ world: a systematic review. One Health. 2016;2:166–74.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  51. 51.

    Bossart GD. Marine mammals as sentinel species for oceans and human health. Oceanography. 2006;19:134–7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  52. 52.

    Yang J, Scholten T. A fixative for intestinal parasites permitting the use of concentration and permanent staining procedures. Am J Clin Pathol. 1977;67:300–4.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  53. 53.

    Untersuchungsmethoden Bauer C. In: Schnieder T, editor. Veterinärmedizinische parasitologie. 3rd ed. Stuttgart: Parey; 2006. p. 84–104.

    Google Scholar 

  54. 54.

    Heine J. Eine einfache Nachweismethode für Kryptosporidien im Kot. ZBL Vet Med B. 1982;29:324–7.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  55. 55.

    Kleinertz S, Hermosilla C, Ziltener A, Kreicker S, Hirzmann J, Abdel-Ghaffar F, et al. Gastrointestinal parasites of free-living Indo-Pacific bottlenose dolphins (Tursiops aduncus) in the Northern Red Sea, Egypt. Parasitol Res. 2014;113:1405–15.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  56. 56.

    de Vos A, Faux CE, Marthick J, Dickinson J, Jarman SN. New determination of prey and parasite species for northern Indian Ocean Blue Whales. Front Mar Sci. 2018;5:104.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  57. 57.

    Hermosilla C, Silva LM, Navarro M, Taubert A. Anthropozoonotic endoparasites in free-ranging “urban” South American sea lions (Otaria flavescens). J Vet Med. 2016;2016:1–7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  58. 58.

    Nunes CM, Lima LGF, Manoel CS, Pereira RN, Nakano MM, Garcia JF. Fecal specimens preparation methods for PCR diagnosis of human taeniosis. Rev Inst Med Trop São Paulo. 2006;48:45–7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  59. 59.

    Kokuzawa T, Ichikawa-Seki M, Itagaki T. Determination of phylogenetic relationships among Eimeria species, which parasitize cattle, on the basis of nuclear 18S rDNA sequence. J Vet Med Sci. 2013;75:1427–31.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  60. 60.

    Larkin M, Blackshields G, Brown N, Chenna R, McGettigan P, McWilliam H. Clustal W and Clustal X version 2.0. Bioinformatics. 2007;23:2947–8.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  61. 61.

    Darriba D, Taboada GL, Doallo R, Posada D. jModelTest 2: more models, new heuristics and parallel computing. Nat Methods. 2012;9:772.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  62. 62.

    Guindon S, Gascuel O. A simple, fast, and accurate algorithm to estimate large phylogenies by maximum likelihood. Syst Biol. 2003;52:696–704.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  63. 63.

    Andrew Rambaut. Molecular evolution, phylogenetics and epidemiology. Andrew Rambaut´s research group: FigTree. 2007. Accessed 18 Feb 2019.

  64. 64.

    Hermosilla C, Hirzmann J, Silva L, Brotons J, Cerdà M, Prenger-Berninghoff E, et al. Occurrence of anthropozoonotic parasitic infections and faecal microbes in free-ranging sperm whales (Physeter macrocephalus) from the Mediterranean Sea. Parasitol Res. 2018;117:2531–41.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references


We are thankful to “Grupo de Guardianes del Manatí de Carare y Riberas del San Juan”, WCS Colombia, Ecopetrol, “Fundación Julio Mario Santo Domingo” and “Cabildo Verde Sabana de Torres”, which organized the project “Wildlife” and have supported the sample collection of the study. We also extend our thanks to Dr Iván Conejeros (Institute of Parasitology, Justus Liebig University Giessen) for his contributions provided in the phylogenetic analysis.


The sample collection in this research was supported by “Grupo de Guardianes del Manatí de Carare y Riberas del San Juan”, through the “Proyecto Vida Silvestre”, funded by Ecopetrol, Wildlife Conservation Society, “Fundación Mario Santo Domingo” and “Cabildo Verde Sabana de Torres”. The processing of samples, analysis of results and the publication of the present study did not receive any specific grant from funding agencies in the public, commercial, or not-for-profit sectors.

Availability of data and materials

All relevant data supporting the conclusions of this study are included within the article.

Authors’ contributions

Conceived and designed the study: CH and SC. Performed the sample collection: KAG. Processed and analysed the samples: JV, JH and MKL. Produced the SEM images: AS and UG. Supervised laboratory work: CH and AT. Wrote the paper: JV, CH, MKL, JH, KA-G and AT. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Ethics approval and consent to participate

This study was conducted according to the Guidelines for the Treatment of Marine Mammals in Field Research of the Society for Marine Mammalogy. The fieldwork was conducted within the “Wild life” project by “Grupo de Guardianes del Manatí de Carare y Riberas del San Juan” funded by Ecopetrol, Wildlife Conservation Society, “Fundación Mario Santo Domingo” and “Cabildo Verde Sabana de Torres” and Wildlife Conservation Society (WCS). The “Wildlife” Project was conducted with the permission of the “Corporación Autónoma Regional de Santander - CAS” to access the samples.

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Author information



Corresponding author

Correspondence to Juan Vélez.

Additional file

Additional file 1: Table S1.

Prevalence of gastrointestinal and respiratory parasites in wild manatees; present study and literature review.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver ( applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Vélez, J., Hirzmann, J., Arévalo-González, K. et al. Parasite fauna of wild Antillean manatees (Trichechus manatus manatus) of the Andean Region, Colombia. Parasites Vectors 12, 183 (2019).

Download citation


  • Manatees
  • Trichechus manatus manatus
  • Eimeria
  • Phylogeny
  • Chiorchis
  • Entamoeba
  • Giardia