Skip to main content


We’d like to understand how you use our websites in order to improve them. Register your interest.

Prevalence and risk factors for selected canine vector-borne diseases in Greece



Canine vector-borne diseases (CVBDs) represent a wide group of diseases of major significance for canine health. In addition to their veterinary importance, many of these diseases are of great zoonotic concern, posing a risk of potential transmission to humans. To date, there has been scant knowledge regarding the prevalence, distribution and risk factors of CVBDs in Greece. Therefore, the objectives of the present study were to update the current knowledge on the seroprevalence of Dirofilaria immitis, Anaplasma spp., Ehrlichia spp. and Borrelia burgdorferi (sensu lato) in dogs in Greece and, furthermore, to assess possible environmental and any other risk factors associated with these infections. A total of 1000 apparently healthy and randomly selected dogs, presented in veterinary clinics, were involved at the national level (n = 66 municipalities). Serum samples were obtained from each individual dog and were tested using the SNAP® 4Dx® Plus kit from IDEXX Laboratories. Possible risk factors were assessed using binary regression models, including dogs’ lifestyle, climatological parameters and the altitude of the region.


Overall, 21.8% (95% CI: 19.4–24.5%) of the sampled dogs were found to be seropositive to at least one of the four pathogens examined. The most prevalent pathogen was Ehrlichia spp. (12.5%, 95% CI: 10.6–14.7) followed by D. immitis (9.0%, 95% CI: 7.8–11.5) and Anaplasma spp. (6.2%, 95% CI: 4.9–7.9). The lowest prevalence (0.1%) was recorded for B. burgdorferi (s.l.) where only one dog was found to be positive. Among the examined risk factors, low mean temperature was found to increase the prevalence of Ehrlichia spp. (P ≤ 0.001) and Anaplasma spp. (P ≤ 0.001), while low minimum temperature increased the prevalence of D. immitis (P ≤ 0.001). In addition, low total annual rainfall had an effect of the prevalence of Ehrlichia spp. (P ≤ 0.01). Altitude also had a significant effect on the prevalence of D. immitis (P ≤ 0.05) and Anaplasma spp. (P ≤ 0.01).


To our knowledge, this is the first large-scale seroepidemiological study of CVBDs in Greece. It has been evidenced that environmental factors such as temperature, rainfall and altitude can influence the prevalence and distribution of CVBDs.


Canine vector-borne diseases (CVBDs) can significantly impact canine health status. The etiology of CVBDs is wide, including a variety of pathogens, i.e. protozoans, helminths, bacteria and viruses, all transmitted by hematophagous arthropods such as mosquitoes, ticks, fleas, lice and phlebotomine sandflies [1, 2]. CVBDs have a wide range of clinical manifestation, from asymptomatic cases to severe health implications, depending on the pathogenicity of the specific causative agent and the presence of single or co-infections, which complicates their diagnosis, control and treatment for veterinary practitioners [3, 4]. Moreover, animals with subclinical CVBDs infections are more susceptible to other infectious diseases [5, 6]. In addition to their veterinary importance, many of these diseases are of major zoonotic concern, posing a risk of potential transmission to humans [3, 7]. Therefore, the control of these diseases is a challenging field with evident benefits for both animal and public health [3, 8]. In this respect, Ehrlichia canis, Dirofilaria immitis, Anaplasma phagocytophilum and Borrelia burgdorferi are of great concern [4].

During recent decades, the worldwide distribution of CVBDs has been constantly changing [9]. This is attributed to a plethora of anthropogenic factors, including climate change, globalization, international transportation and trade, and the rapid growth of human, canine and wildlife reservoir populations [10]. Climate is a substantial factor considering the survival and spread of arthropod vectors and subsequently the distribution of CVBDs [9]. In particular, arthropod vectors and their life-cycles are strongly affected by environmental temperature. Apart from the life-cycle of vectors, the reproduction and survival rate of the parasitic and viral agents inside vectors and definitive hosts have also been found to be affected by environmental temperature [11].

Vectors (e.g. Aedes albopictus) and pathogens (e.g. Leishmania infantum, D. immitis) could expand or (re-)emerge due to climate change [12,13,14,15]. In Greece, according to the Intergovernmental Panel of Climate Change (IPCC), the climate is expected to evolve towards more tropical climates characterized by an extended dry and hot season [16], and this may affect the distribution of CVBDs [17] in the country.

According to relevant studies, many CVBDs have been reported in canine populations [18, 19], as well as in human populations in Greece [20,21,22]. However, the majority of the fore-mentioned studies have been focused on single species of pathogens and examined the situation in a restricted area and number of animals. Furthermore, none of these studies have assessed the relationship between climate and the seroprevalence of CVBDs in the country.

The aim of this study was to update the current state of knowledge on the seroprevalence of Ehrlichia spp., D. immitis, Anaplasma spp. and B. burgdorferi (s.l.), in Greece. In addition, we studied the effects of environmental and other risk factors on the seroprevalence of CVBDs in Greece.


Study area

At least one representative area from each municipality of the country was selected for sampling. This resulted in 66 locations similarly-spaced along the north-south and the east-west axes of the country for the sample collection. Among these areas there was a significant diversity of geographical and climate characteristics such as altitude, longitude, latitude, relative humidity, environmental temperature, total annual rainfall and wind speed.

Animals and sample collection

An overall population of 1000 dogs from 66 municipalities was included in the survey: 189 (18.9%) dogs from central Greece; 188 (18.8%) from Macedonia; 181 (18.1%) from Aegean Islands; 150 (15.0%) from Thrace; 116 (11.6%) from Peloponnese; 55 (5.5%) from Ionian Islands; 48 (4.8%) from Crete; 44 (4.4%) from Thessaly; and 29 (2.9%) dogs from Epirus (Fig. 1).

Fig. 1

Geographical distribution of seropositive dogs for CVBDs in Greece

All sampled dogs were randomly selected and apparently healthy. A blood sample was collected from each individual dog when visiting the veterinary clinic for annual vaccination or routine inspection. Blood was collected from the cephalic or jugular vein into vacutainer tubes without anticoagulant and stored in the refrigerator for a maximum of 24 h until centrifugation. Samples were centrifuged at 1300–1800×g for 20 min, and then serum was separated from the clot. Serum samples were stored at − 20 °C until further assayed.

After sample collection, data regarding the characteristics of the dogs were collected using a structured, case-specific questionnaire including information about age, sex, breed, lifestyle (outdoors, indoors) of the dog and information about the last antiparasitic treatment (endo- and/or ectoparasiticides active against vectors or vector-borne pathogens, i.e. milbemycin, fipronil, permethrin, etc.), as presented in Table 1. All dogs participating in the study were apparently healthy at physical examination, not infested with ectoparasites and older than 6 months. The study lasted one year, from the 1st of January 2016 until the 31st of December 2016.

Table 1 Distribution of the dog population (n = 1000 dogs) according to the studied parameters

Climatological and altitude data

For each of the studied regions climatological data were collected including mean, minimum and maximum environmental temperature (°C), mean humidity (%), total annual rainfall (mm) and mean wind speed (knots). Meteorological data were acquired from two climatological databases, namely the Hellenic National Meteorological Services (HNMS) and the “Meteo View” platform. The HNMS is the official government agency responsible for the weather forecast and observations at the national level. The “Meteo View” platform is a web-based geographical information system (GIS) tool created and hosted by the “Meteo” weather service. It was made for monitoring and analyzing the meteorological station network set up by Meteo, the Institute of Environmental Research and Sustainable Development (IERSD) and the National Observatory of Athens (NOA). For each studied region, the nearest meteorological station was selected, and its data were used for further analyses. Mean values for each metric were obtained from HNMS and supplemented by the “Meteo View” when it was necessary. The mean values obtained from these metrics were as follows: 15.9 °C, −5.5 °C and 38.3 °C for mean, minimum and maximum environmental temperature, respectively, 69.7% for mean relative humidity, 554 mm for total annual rainfall and 10.7 knots for mean wind speed.

The altitude data of the studied regions were derived from a digital elevation model (DEM) and data collected by NASA’s Shuttle Radar Topography Mission (SRTM) which provides an accuracy of approximately ± 1.73 m. This accuracy level has been considered sufficient for similar studies and has already been used in order to extract geographical information [23, 24]. The altitude measurements were taken from points on the map which represented the exact place of sampling. Three altitude-zones were considered: 0–100 metres above sea level (masl); 101–400 masl; and 401–900 masl.

Serological analysis

Serum samples were tested using a rapid enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) kit (SNAP® 4Dx® Plus Test Kit, IDEXX Laboratories, Inc, Westbrook, ME, USA), according to the manufacturer instructions. Two spots are impregnated respectively with a specific peptide antigen of B. burgdorferi (s.l.) (C6 peptide, derived from the IR6 region within the Borrelia membrane protein VlsE; [25]) and E. canis (peptides from p30 and p30-1 outer membrane proteins; cross-reactive with Ehrlichia chaffeensis; [26]). The device additionally detects antibodies to E. ewingii (peptide derived from p28 outer surface protein family; [27]). The D. immitis analyte is derived from two antibodies (one for capture and the other for detection) specific to heartworm antigens, which are primarily produced by adult females. This in-clinic test detects specific antibodies to A. phagocytophilum/A. platys (peptide from the major surface protein p44/MSP2; [27]). In contrast to the whole-cell antigen present on A. phagocytophilum IFA slides, no genus level cross-reaction between Anaplasma and Ehrlichia is observed within this device based on the utilization of specific peptides [28]. The respective sensitivity and specificity of the test system are 93.2 and 99.2% for A. phagocytophilum, 89.2 and 99.2% for A. platys, 96.7 and 98.8% for B. burgdorferi (s.l.), 97.8 and 92.3% for E. canis, and 98.9 and 99.3% for D. immitis. Furthermore, a cross-reactivity of E. canis antigens with anti-E. chaffeensis antibodies was shown. Due to documented cross-reactivity between A. phagocytophilum and A. platys, as well as the reactivity to E. canis, E. chaffeensis and E. ewingii [27], we refer to Anaplasma spp. and Ehrlichia spp. in the results of the present study (as isolates were not identified to the species level).

Data handling and statistical analysis

Data were recorded in a Microsoft Excel spreadsheet and imported into IBM SPSS Statistics v.23.0. for the subsequent statistical analyses. The prevalence of parasitic infections was defined as the proportion of positive animals to the total number of the examined animals and the 95% confidence intervals (CI) of the prevalence values were estimated using the Wilson score interval method. Stepwise binary logistic regression models were used to assess the effects of possible risk factors [age, sex, habitat, use, last antiparasitic treatment, altitude, environmental temperature (mean, minimum and maximum), mean humidity, total annual rainfall and wind speed] on the likelihood that a dog is infected with Ehrlichia spp., D. immitis and Anaplasma spp.

A forward stepwise selection procedure of the variables was followed and only predictors which had a significant effect (P ≤ 0.05) on each individual parasitic infection were used for the final models. According to this, the likelihood of (i) Ehrlichia spp., (ii) D. immitis, and (iii) Anaplasma spp. infection were estimated using as predictors the regression coefficients of (i) habitat use, last antiparasitic treatment, mean temperature and total annual rainfall, (ii) altitude, last antiparasitic treatment and minimum temperature, and (iii) altitude, last antiparasitic treatment and mean temperature.

Statistical significance of individual predictors was tested using the Wald Chi-square statistic of their regression coefficients (βs). The Hosmer–Lemeshow (H–L) test, Cox and Snell R2 and Nagelkerke R2 indices were also calculated to assess the goodness-of-fit for each individual model.


The distribution of the sampled dogs according to climatological data and the altitude of the studied areas are summarized in Table 1.

Seroprevalence of CVBDs in the studied dog population

Overall, 21.8% (218/1000, 95% CI: 19.4–24.5%) of the sampled dogs were found to be seropositive to at least one of the four pathogens examined in this present study (Table 2). Moreover, the proportion of dogs that were seropositive against one, two or three parasites was 16.5% (165/1000, 95% CI: 14.3–18.9%), 4.7% (47/1000, 95% CI: 3.6–6.2%) and 0.6% (6/1000, 95% CI: 0.3–1.3), respectively (Table 2). Overall, the most prevalent canine vector-borne pathogen was Ehrlichia spp. (12.5%, 125/1000, 95% CI: 10.6–14.7%) followed by D. immitis (9.0%, 90/1000, 95% CI: 7.8–11.5%) and Anaplasma spp. (6.2%, 62/1000, 95% CI: 4.9–7.9%); the lowest prevalence was recorded for B. burgdorferi (s.l.) where only one dog was found to be positive (0.1%). The detailed epizootiological map deriving from our results is presented in Fig. 1.

Table 2 Number and prevalence of canine vector-borne infections and co-infections in the studied dog population (n = 1000 dogs) in Greece

Risk factors associated to CVBD seroprevalence

Table 3 summarizes the risk factors for CVBDs and their effects on seropositivity status. For Ehrlichia spp., animals that lived outdoors were more likely to be seropositive to Ehrlichia spp. in comparison with those living indoors (P = 0.013, OR: 2.3, 95% CI: 1.2–4.4). Moreover, companion dogs were more likely to be seropositive for Ehrlichia spp. than hunting dogs (P = 0.002, OR: 2.6, 95% CI: 1.4–4.6). Additionally, the likelihood of Ehrlichia spp. seropositivity was higher for the animals that have not received antiparasitic treatment (endo- and/or ectoparasiticides active against vectors or vector-borne pathogens, i.e. milbemycin, fipronil, permethrin, etc.) for 12 months prior to sampling, when compared to those that had never received antiparasitic treatment (P = 0.03, OR: 2.7, 95% CI: 1.1–6.7), those that had received treatment in the last 6 to 12 months (P = 0.007, OR: 5.6, 95% CI: 1.6–19.6), 3 to 6 months (P = 0.001, OR: 5.1, 95% CI: 1.9–13.9) and less than 3 months (P = 0.0001, OR: 5.6, 95% CI: 2.3–13.9). Regarding the climatological conditions, the likelihood of Ehrlichia spp. seropositivity was higher for dogs living in areas with a mean temperature < 15.9 °C (P = 0.001, OR: 2.2, 95% CI: 1.4–3.5) in comparison to dogs living in areas with mean temperature ≥ 15.9 °C. Similarly, dogs that were living in areas with lower total annual rainfall were more likely to be seropositive to Ehrlichia spp. when compared to those animals that were living in areas with higher total annual rainfall (P = 0.004, OR: 2.1, 95% CI: 1.3–3.5). In the case of D. immitis infection, dogs that were living in areas with an altitude of 0–100 masl were more likely to be infected when compared to dogs living in areas with an altitude of 401–900 masl (P = 0.019, OR: 3.2, 95% CI: 1.2–8.5). Additionally, the likelihood of D. immitis seropositivity was higher for the animals that had not received antiparasitic treatment for more than 12 months comparing to those that had received treatment in the last 3 months (P < 0.0001, OR: 5.8, 95% CI: 2.2–15.1) and those that had received treatment in the last 3 to 6 months (P < 0.0001, OR: 7.6, 95% CI: 2.5–23.8). Moreover, the likelihood of D. immitis seropositivity was higher for dogs living in areas with a minimum temperature < −5.5 °C in comparison to dogs living in regions with a minimum temperature ≥ −5.5 °C (P < 0.0001, OR: 4.5, 95% CI: 2.7–7.5). The effects of the risk factors on Anaplasma spp. seropositivity status are presented in Table 3. The likelihood of Anaplasma spp. seropositivity was higher for dogs living in areas with a mean temperature < 15.9 °C when compared to those dogs living in areas with mean temperature ≥ 15.9 °C (P < 0.0001, OR: 4.2, 95% CI: 2.3–7.8). Moreover, dogs that were sampled from areas with an altitude of 0–100 masl were more likely to be seropositive to Anaplasma spp. in comparison with dogs living in areas with an altitude of 401–900 masl (P = 0.010, OR: 7.1, 95% CI: 1.6–31.5). Finally, the likelihood of Anaplasma spp. seropositivity was higher for the animals that had never received any kind of antiparasitic treatment (endo- and/or ectoparasiticides active against vectors or vector-borne pathogens, i.e. milbemycin, fipronil, permethrin, etc.) compared to the those that had received antiparasitic treatment in the last 3 to 6 months (P = 0.013, OR: 3.5, 95% CI: 1.3–9.3).

Table 3 P-values, odds ratios and 95% CI for odds ratios, of the predictor variables used in Ehrlichia spp., Dirofilaria immitis and Anaplasma spp. models


CVBDs are of major importance for veterinarians as well as for public health practitioners and constitute a field of increased scientific interest worldwide. The primary aim of this multicentric study was to assess the seroprevalence of CVBDs in Greece and investigate possible relationships between these infections, climate conditions and altitude. To the best of the authors’ knowledge, this is the first study conducted in Greece in order to assess the seroprevalence of CVBDs in canine population, which includes a large sample derived from each prefecture of the country and thus generates valuable and resilient data.

Overall, according to our results the recorded prevalence of CVBDs in dogs from Greece was high, with 21.8% of the sampled dogs being seropositive to at least one of the tested pathogens. Specifically, Ehrlichia spp. (12.5%) were the most prevalent canine vector-borne pathogens followed by D. immitis (9.0%) and Anaplasma spp. (6.2%); the lowest prevalence was detected for B. burgdorferi (s.l.) (0.1%). Correspondingly, previous studies have reported high prevalence estimates of CVBDs in other European countries, even though various diagnostic methods were used. In neighboring countries, such as Bulgaria and northeastern Turkey, studies have demonstrated a high prevalence of CVBDs with overall percentages of 64.7 and 48.9%, respectively [25, 29], whereas in Italy and Romania the overall prevalence rates were comparatively lower, i.e. 10.3 and 11.3% respectively [30, 31]. Other studies from the Balkan Peninsula have indicated an overall prevalence of CVBDs ranging from 25.7% in Croatia to 25.1% in Albania [32, 33]. Higher prevalence rates have been observed in Spain (37.1%) [34] and Portugal (66%) [35]. In some of the aforementioned studies, the results reflect the simultaneous presence of other pathogens, i.e. Leishmania spp.

Among the examined vector-borne pathogens, Ehrlichia spp. was found to be the most common (12.5%). Ehrlichiosis, apart from its veterinary importance, is of public health concern since some Ehrlichia species can also infect humans [36, 37]. To the best of our knowledge, prior to the present study there were no data available regarding the prevalence of Ehrlichia spp. in canine populations in Greece. Contrarily, there are some clinical studies reporting several cases of Ehrlichia spp. natural infections in dogs [38,39,40,41]. According to our findings, the likelihood of seropositivity to Ehrlichia spp. was associated mainly with the lifestyle of dogs and the antiparasitic scheme followed by the owner. First, dogs that were living outdoors had a higher possibility of being seropositive to Ehrlichia spp. when compared to those living indoors (c.2.3 times, P ≤ 0.05). This result can be attributed to the fact that dogs living outdoors have an increased chance of being exposed to the natural environment of the brown dog tick Rhipicephalus sanguineus (s.l.), which is the main vector of this pathogen and also the dominant tick species in dogs in Greece [42]. Lifestyle seems to have a significant effect on the seroprevalence of Ehrlichia spp. but not on the seroprevalence of the other studied tick-borne pathogens. A possible explanation relies to the fact that Ehrlichia spp. was the most prevalent pathogen and therefore the likelihood of its transmission is probably higher than that of the other examined tick-borne pathogens. Secondly, we found that that companion dogs had a greater chance of being seropositive to Ehrlichia spp. when compared to hunting dogs (c.2.6 times, P = 0.002). Parameters that could explain this finding include age and health status of the studied dogs. Hunting dogs are working dogs and hence they are mostly young dogs with a good health status which is necessary for being capable of hunting and also better prophylactically protected. When they grow older usually, they are donated and afterwards they are kept as companion dogs. Companion dogs, on the other hand, do not have any limitations regarding age or health status. Furthermore, it was found that dogs that did not receive frequent antiparasitic treatment tended to be seropositive to Ehrlichia spp. when compared to the animals that received them on a regular basis. As expected, the present result indicates that animals that received few antiparasitic treatments (including ectoparasiticides, i.e. fipronil and permethrin) were more likely to be infested by ticks and therefore it underlines the necessity of prevention against ectoparasites. In addition to the individual parameters of the dog, we also assessed environmental parameters as confounding factors. Nonetheless, a confounding effect regarding the region of the collected samples could be possible. In any case, comparisons between the 66 municipalities included in the sampling campaign was not within the scope of the present study and hence we selected not to use the fixed effect of region for the statistical analyses. Instead, we decided to assess climatic conditions (which are significant descriptors of the region) as possible risk factors. Under this perspective, it is possible to enhance the applicability of the results in other cases and regions where a similar climate exists. Regarding climatological conditions, surprisingly, it was demonstrated that dogs that were living in areas with a mean temperature < 15.9 °C were more likely to be seropositive to Ehrlichia spp. than dogs living in areas with a mean temperature ≥ 15.9 °C (c.2.2 times, P = 0.001). The exposure to extreme cold temperatures has a significant harmful effect on the development of R. sanguineus (s.l.) [43]. However, in Greece the climate remains typical mild Mediterranean, even in regions with a mean temperature < 15.9 °C, which favors the development of ticks. Moreover, we found that there is an effect of the total annual rainfall in the seroprevalence of Ehrlichia spp.: dogs that were living in dry areas with a low total annual rainfall < 554 mm (c.2.1 times, P = 0.004) were more likely to be seropositive to Ehrlichia spp. when compared to the animals that were living in wetter areas with a total annual rainfall ≥ 554 mm. Similar results have been previously reported in a study in Brazil where dogs were more likely to be infested by R. sanguineus ticks in drier environments [44]. This could be linked to the fact that R. sanguineus ticks are better adapted to drier climates when compared to other tick species, such as Ixodes ricinus, which prefer wetter climates [45].

The second most frequent canine vector-borne pathogen detected in our study was D. immitis with an overall antigen seropositivity of 9.0%. Dirofilaria immitis, widely known as the canine heartworm, is a filarial nematode transmitted by mosquitoes (Culex spp., Aedes spp. and Anopheles spp.) acknowledged to be the causative agent of cardiopulmonary dirofilariosis in dogs (heartworm disease) [46]. Dirofilaria immitis can also cause pulmonary dirofilariosis in humans, thus resulting in public health implications [47]. Many European countries, including Greece, are enzootic for this disease [18, 48]. Previous surveys from Greece have reported similar results; however, these were not large-scale studies and cannot be considered representative of the situation at a national level [18, 49, 50]. Additionally, dirofilariosis has also been previously reported in humans in Greece, a fact that underscores its zoonotic potential in the country [51, 52]. Nowadays, D. repens attracts more scientific interest as an emerging zoonotic agent than D. immitis. It is likely that in the past Dirofilaria species in humans were not always correctly identified and remained underdiagnosed at species level [53]. According to our results, the likelihood of antigen detection of D. immitis was associated mainly with the last antiparasitic treatments (i.e. milbemycin, permethrinor, other antiparasitics with repellent or larvicide activity against Dirofilaria spp.) of the examined animals. It can be concluded that unprotected animals are more susceptible to vector-borne infections. Therefore, the demand for frequent and effective chemoprophylaxis, for all dogs, all year round and regardless of the occurrence of infection should be emphasized. Moreover, it should be stressed that prevention for Dirofilaria infections is essential from both a veterinary and public health perspective. Altitude was found to be associated with D. immitis infection: dogs living in regions with a low altitude of 0–100 masl were more susceptible to dirofilariosis compared to dogs living in areas with a high altitude (401–900 masl). Mountainous regions with high altitude have low mean temperatures all year round and fewer water catchments, wetlands and valleys, which makes them unfavorable for the development of mosquitoes and, hence, the spreading of the disease. Similar results indicating this inversely proportional relationship between altitude and distribution of a mosquito-borne disease have been reported for malaria [54]. The likelihood of D. immitis seropositivity was also associated with the minimum temperature of the region of origin of the studied dogs. Surprisingly, our results indicate that dogs that were living in areas with a minimum temperature < −5.5 °C had a higher probability of being D. immitis-antigen-positive in comparison to those that were living in areas with a minimum temperature ≥ −5.5 °C. However, it has already been stated from previous studies that there is a northward geographical distribution of D. immitis in Greece [18], something that corresponds to our results, as the majority of regions with low minimum temperature are located in the northern part of the country. This finding can be easily explained by the increased population of mosquitoes in the northern parts of Greece [55], where water retention sites, ponds and agricultural valleys are more common. In the present study, the association between climatological conditions, altitude and seroprevalence of canine dirofilariosis has been assessed for the first time in Greece. Notably, in the present study, cases of canine dirofilariosis were reported in the Cyclades Islands and Southern Peloponnese, thus indicating a possible spread southward.

The third examined canine vector-borne pathogen group were Anaplasma species. Anaplasma platys, transmitted by R. sanguineus (s.l.), infects the platelets and is considered as the etiological agent of infectious canine cyclic thrombocytopenia [56, 57]. Conversely, A. phagocytophilum, transmitted by Ixodes ricinus ticks, infects white blood cells, mainly neutrophils, causing granulocytic anaplasmosis in dogs [58]. Additionally, A. phagocytophilum could be pathogenic for humans with potential zoonotic implications [58]. Due to their molecular similarity and cross-reactions, it is almost impossible to differentiate A. platys and A. phagocytophilum using serological analysis [59] while mixed infections are possible [60]. It was found that the overall prevalence of A. platys and/or A. phagocytophilum seropositivity was 6.2%. Data regarding the seroprevalence of Anaplasma spp. in the canine population in Greece were scarce except for some sporadic reported cases of A. phagocytophilum infections [19, 61]. A recent study reported A. platys in R. sanguineus ticks in Greece [42]. There are some studies considering human anaplasmosis due to A. phagocytophilum highlighting the zoonotic potential of this disease in Greece [20, 62, 63]. According to the results obtained for Ehrlichia spp. and D. immitis, a negative correlation between the seropositivity to Anaplasma spp. and the time of the last antiparasitic (i.e. fipronil, permethrin, etc.) treatment of the dog was reported. This result underlines that unprotected animals are at a significant risk of acquiring any of the CVBDs. Moreover, the mean environmental temperature poses a significant risk factor for the seropositivity to Anaplasma spp. As is the case for Ehrlichia spp., mean environmental temperature acts as a crucial factor for the development and distribution of ticks thereby affecting the distribution of tick-borne diseases, including anaplasmosis. Altitude of a region significantly affects the likelihood of seropositivity to Anaplasma spp., which is consistent with a previous study, where it was indicated that canine anaplasmosis due to A. phagocytophilum is an altitude-dependent disease [64].

In the present study the seropositivity to the spirochete B. burgdorferi was assessed. Borrelia burgdorferi (s.l.) complex includes at least 19 species and is transmitted mainly by ticks of the genus Ixodes [26]. Borrelia burgdorferi is the primary agent that causes Lyme borreliosis in dogs and humans [65]. Dogs are naturally exposed to tick infestations, may act as reservoirs, and consequently play a significant role to the transmission of Lyme disease to humans [66]. Although Lyme borreliosis in humans has been previously reported in Greece [67, 68] this is the first time a seropositive dog for B. burgdorferi has been identified. It should be noted that the prevalence of infection detected in dogs is low. Correspondingly, the incidence of human borreliosis in Greece is the lowest among other European countries [69]. The above can be attributed to the fact that the main tick species that infests dogs in Greece is the brown dog tick (R. sanguineus), which does not transmit B. burgdorferi. On the other hand, I. ricinus that is the main vector of B. burgdorferi is very rare in Greece [42]. As expected, in northern countries of Europe where the prevalence of I. ricinus is high, the occurrence of Lyme borreliosis in dogs is higher.


Our results suggest that animals living outdoors and receiving only occasionally or no antiparasitic treatments are prone to infections with canine vector-borne pathogens. These findings highlight the significance and the urgent need for appropriate antiparasitic treatments, especially for those dogs living mostly outdoors. Additionally, it is essential to underline that early diagnosis by using quick with high sensitivity and specificity diagnostic tests such as SNAP® 4Dx® Plus, as well as early intervention of CVBDs could improve the expected prognosis, especially in life-threatening diseases. Finally, our work represents the first attempt to demonstrate the relationships between the seroprevalence of CVBDs and climatological conditions, including altitude. Among the examined climatologic conditions, mean and minimum temperature, rainfall and altitude can influence the prevalence and distribution of CVBDs.

Availability of data and materials

Data supporting the conclusions of this article are included within the article.



canine vector-borne diseases


confidence interval

s.l. :

sensu lato


Hellenic National Meteorological Services


meters above sea level


  1. 1.

    Otranto D, Dantas-Torres F, Breitschwerdt EB. Managing canine vector-borne diseases of zoonotic concern: part one. Trends Parasitol. 2009;25:157–63.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. 2.

    Beugnet F, Marie JL. Emerging arthropod-borne diseases of companion animals in Europe. Vet Parasitol. 2009;163:298–305.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. 3.

    Otranto D, Dantas-Torres F, Breitschwerdt EB. Managing canine vector-borne diseases of zoonotic concern: part two. Trends Parasitol. 2009;25:228–35.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. 4.

    Day MJ. The immunopathology of canine vector-borne diseases. Parasit Vectors. 2011;4:48.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. 5.

    Billeter SA, Levy MG, Chomel BB, Breitschwerdt EB. Vector transmission of Bartonella species with emphasis on the potential for tick transmission. Med Vet Entomol. 2008;22:1–15.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  6. 6.

    Perez C, Maggi RG, Diniz PP, Breitschwerdt EB. Molecular and serological diagnosis of Bartonella infection in 61 dogs from the United States. J Vet Intern Med. 2011;25:805–10.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  7. 7.

    Dantas-Torres F, Chomel BB, Otranto D. Ticks and tick-borne diseases: a One Health perspective. Trends Parasitol. 2012;28:437–46.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. 8.

    European Scientific Counsel Companion Animal Parasites (ESCCAP). Guideline 05—control of vector-borne diseases in dogs and cats (2nd ed.). 2012. Accessed 5 Nov 2017.

  9. 9.

    Beugnet F, Chalvet-Monfray K. Impact of climate change in the epidemiology of vector-borne diseases in domestic carnivores. Comp Immunol Microbiol Infect Dis. 2013;36:559–66.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  10. 10.

    Duscher GG, Leschnik M, Fuehrer HP, Joachim A. Wildlife reservoirs for vector-borne canine, feline and zoonotic infections in Austria. Int J Parasitol Parasites Wildl. 2015;4:88–96.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. 11.

    Semenza JC, Menne B. Climate change and infectious diseases in Europe. Lancet Infect Dis. 2009;9:365–75.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. 12.

    European Academies Science Advisory Council (EASAC). Climate change and infectious diseases in Europe. 2010. Accessed 10 Mar 2010.

  13. 13.

    Cunze S, Koch LK, Kochmann J, Klimpel S. Aedes albopictus and Aedes japonicus—two invasive mosquito species with different temperature niches in Europe. Parasit Vectors. 2016;9:573.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. 14.

    Otranto D, Capelli G, Genchi C. Changing distribution patterns of canine vector borne diseases in Italy: leishmaniosis vs. dirofilariosis. Parasit Vectors. 2009;2(Suppl. 1):S2.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. 15.

    Genchi C, Mortarino M, Rinaldi L, Cringoli G, Traldi G, Genchi M. Changing climate and changing vector-borne disease distribution: the example of Dirofilaria in Europe. Vet Parasitol. 2011;176:295–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. 16.

    Kovats RS, Valentini R, Bouwer LM, Georgopoulou E, Jacob D, Martin E, et al. Climate change 2014: impacts, adaptation, and vulnerability. Part B: Regional aspects. In: Contribution of working group II to the Fifth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 2014. p. 1267–326.

  17. 17.

    Dantas-Torres F. Climate change, biodiversity, ticks and tick-borne diseases: the butterfly effect. Int J Parasitol Parasites Wildl. 2015;4:452–61.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. 18.

    Diakou A, Kapantaidakis E, Tamvakis A, Giannakis V, Strus N. Dirofilaria infections in dogs in different areas of Greece. Parasit Vectors. 2016;9:508.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. 19.

    Mylonakis ME, Koutinas AF, Baneth G, Polizopoulou Z, Fytianou A. Mixed Ehrlichia canis, Hepatozoon canis, and presumptive Anaplasma phagocytophilum infection in a dog. Vet Clin Path. 2004;33:249–51.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. 20.

    Chochlakis D, Psaroulaki A, Kokkini S, Kostanatis S, Arkalati E, Karagrannaki E, et al. First evidence of Anaplasma infection in Crete, Greece. Report of six human cases. Clin Microbiol Infect. 2009;15(Suppl 2):8–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. 21.

    Chochlakis D, Papaeustathiou A, Minadakis G, Psaroulaki A, Tselentis Y. A serosurvey of Anaplasma phagocytophilum in blood donors in Crete, Greece. Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis. 2008;27:473–5.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  22. 22.

    Daniel SA, Manika K, Arvanitidou M, Diza E, Symeonidis N, Antoniadis A. Serologic evidence of human granulocytic ehrlichiosis, Greece. Emerg Infect Dis. 2002;8:643–4.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. 23.

    Nasereddin A, Salant H, Abdeen Z. Feline leishmaniasis in Jerusalem: serological investigation. Vet Parasitol. 2008;158:364–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. 24.

    Carvalho LFR, de Melo CB, McManus C, Haddad JPA. Use of satellite images for geographical localization of livestock holdings in Brazil. Prev Vet Med. 2012;103:74–7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. 25.

    Pantchev N, Schnyder M, Vrhovec MG, Schaper R, Tsachev I. Current surveys of the seroprevalence of Borrelia burgdorferi, Ehrlichia canis, Anaplasma phagocytophilum, Leishmania infantum, Babesia canis, Angiostrongylus vasorum and Dirofilaria immitis in dogs in Bulgaria. Parasitol Res. 2015;114:117–30.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. 26.

    Chandrashekar R, Mainville CA, Beall MJ, O’Connor T, Eberts MD, Alleman AR, et al. Performance of a commercially available in-clinic ELISA for the detection of antibodies against Anaplasma phagocytophilum, Ehrlichia canis, and Borrelia burgdorferi and Dirofilaria immitis antigen in dogs. Am J Vet Res. 2010;71:1443–50.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. 27.

    Stillman BA, Monn M, Liu J, Thatcher B, Foster P, Andrews B, et al. Performance of a commercially available in-clinic ELISA for detection of antibodies against Anaplasma phagocytophilum, Anaplasma platys, Borrelia burgdorferi, Ehrlichia canis, and Ehrlichia ewingii and Dirofilaria immitis antigen in dogs. J Am Vet Med Assoc. 2014;245:80–6.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. 28.

    Pantchev N, Pluta S, Huisinga E, Nather S, Scheufelen M, Vrhovec MG, et al. Tick-borne diseases (borreliosis, anaplasmosis, babesiosis) in german and austrian dogs: status quo and review of distribution, transmission, clinical findings, diagnostics and prophylaxis. Parasitol Res. 2015;114(Suppl. 1):S19–54.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. 29.

    Guven E, Avcioglu H, Cengiz S, Hayirli A. Vector-borne pathogens in stray dogs in northeastern Turkey. Vector Borne Zoonotic Dis. 2017;17:610–7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. 30.

    Piantedosi D, Neola B, D’Alessio N, Di Prisco F, Santoro M, Pacifico L, et al. Seroprevalence and risk factors associated with Ehrlichia canis, Anaplasma spp., Borrelia burgdorferi sensu lato, and D. immitis in hunting dogs from southern Italy. Parasitol Res. 2017;116:2651–60.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. 31.

    Mircean V, Dumitrache MO, Gyorke A, Pantchev N, Jodies R, Mihalca AD, et al. Seroprevalence and geographic distribution of Dirofilaria immitis and tick-borne infections (Anaplasma phagocytophilum, Borrelia burgdorferi sensu lato, and Ehrlichia canis) in dogs from Romania. Vector Borne Zoonotic Dis. 2012;12:595–604.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. 32.

    Mrljak V, Kules J, Mihaljevic Z, Torti M, Gotic J, Crnogaj M, et al. Prevalence and geographic distribution of vector-borne pathogens in apparently healthy dogs in Croatia. Vector Borne Zoonotic Dis. 2017;17:398–408.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. 33.

    Hamel D, Shukullari E, Rapti D, Silaghi C, Pfister K, Rehbein S. Parasites and vector-borne pathogens in client-owned dogs in Albania. Blood pathogens and seroprevalences of parasitic and other infectious agents. Parasitol Res. 2016;115:489–99.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. 34.

    Mirò G, Montoya A, Roura X, Galvez R, Sainz A. Seropositivity rates for agents of canine vector-borne diseases in Spain: a multicentre study. Parasit Vectors. 2013;6:117.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. 35.

    Alho AM, Pita J, Amaro A, Amaro F, Schnyder M, Grimm F, et al. Seroprevalence of vector-borne pathogens and molecular detection of Borrelia afzelii in military dogs from Portugal. Parasit Vectors. 2016;9:225.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. 36.

    Olano JP, Walker DH. Human ehrlichioses. Med Clin North Am. 2002;86:375–92.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. 37.

    Gardner SL, Holman RC, Krebs JW, Berkelman R, Childs JE. National surveillance for the human ehrlichioses in the United States, 1997–2001, and proposed methods for evaluation of data quality. Ann N Y Acad Sci. 2003;990:80–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  38. 38.

    Mylonakis ME, Koutinas AF, Leontides LS. Bone marrow mastocytosis in dogs with myelosuppressive monocytic ehrlichiosis (Ehrlichia canis): a retrospective study. Vet Clin Pathol. 2006;35:311–4.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  39. 39.

    Siarkou VI, Mylonakis ME, Bourtzi-Hatzopoulou E, Koutinas AF. Sequence and phylogenetic analysis of the 16S rRNA gene of Ehrlichia canis strains in dogs with clinical monocytic ehrlichiosis. Vet Microbiol. 2007;125:304–12.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  40. 40.

    Mylonakis ME, Day MJ, Siarkou V, Vernau W, Koutinas AF. Absence of myelofibrosis in dogs with myelosuppression induced by Ehrlichia canis infection. J Comp Pathol. 2010;142:328–31.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  41. 41.

    Mylonakis ME, Ceron JJ, Leontides L, Siarkou VI, Martinez S, Tvarijonaviciute A, et al. Serum acute phase proteins as clinical phase indicators and outcome predictors in naturally occurring canine monocytic Ehrlichiosis. J Vet Intern Med. 2011;25:811–7.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  42. 42.

    Latrofa MS, Angelou A, Giannelli A, Annoscia G, Ravagnan S, Dantas-Torres F, et al. Ticks and associated pathogens in dogs from Greece. Parasit Vectors. 2017;10:301.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  43. 43.

    Dantas-Torres F, Giannelli A, Figueredo LA, Otranto D. Effects of prolonged exposure to low temperature on eggs of the brown dog tick, Rhipicephalus sanguineus (Latreille, 1806) (Acari: Ixodidae). Vet Parasitol. 2010;171:327–30.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  44. 44.

    Silveira JA, Passos LM, Ribeiro MF. Population dynamics of Rhipicephalus sanguineus (Latrielle, 1806) in Belo Horizonte, Minas Gerais state, Brazil. Vet Parasitol. 2009;161:270–5.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  45. 45.

    Randolph SE, Green RM, Hoodless AN, Peacey MF. An empirical quantitative framework for the seasonal population dynamics of the tick Ixodes ricinus. Int J Parasitol. 2002;32:979–89.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  46. 46.

    McCall JW, Genchi C, Kramer LH, Guerrero J, Venco L. Heartworm disease in animals and humans. Adv Parasitol. 2008;66:193–285.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  47. 47.

    Simon F, Morchon R, Gonzalez-Miguel J, Marcos-Atxutegi C, Siles-Lucas M. What is new about animal and human dirofilariosis? Trends Parasitol. 2009;25:404–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  48. 48.

    Genchi C, Rinaldi L, Mortarino M, Genchi M, Cringoli G. Climate and Dirofilaria infection in Europe. Vet Parasitol. 2009;163:286–92.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  49. 49.

    Diakou A. Epidemiological study of dog parasitosis diagnosed by blood and serological examinations. Anima. 2000;8:9–17.

    Google Scholar 

  50. 50.

    Diakou A. The prevalence of canine dirofilariosis in the region of Attiki. JHVMS. 2001;52:152–6.

    Google Scholar 

  51. 51.

    Pampiglione S, Rivasi F, Vakalis N. Human pulmonary dirofilariasis: the first case observed in Greece. Ann Pathol. 2000;20:626–8.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  52. 52.

    Miliaras D, Meditskou S, Kelekis A, Papachristos I. Human pulmonary dirofilariasis: one more case in Greece suggests that Dirofilaria is a rather common cause of coin lesions in the lungs in endemic areas of Europe. Int J Immunopathol Pharmacol. 2010;23:345–8.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  53. 53.

    Simon F, Siles-Lucas M, Morchon R, Gonzalez-Miguel J, Mellado I, Carreton E, et al. Human and animal dirofilariasis: the emergence of a zoonotic mosaic. Clin Microbiol Rev. 2012;25:507–44.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  54. 54.

    Bodker R, Akida J, Shayo D, Kisinza W, Msangeni HA, Pedersen EM, et al. Relationship between altitude and intensity of malaria transmission in the Usambara Mountains, Tanzania. J Med Entomol. 2003;40:706–17.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  55. 55.

    Diakou A, Gewehr S, Kapantaidakis E, Mourelatos S. Can mosquito population dynamics predict Dirofilaria hyperendemic foci? In: E-SOVE 2014 the 19th conference Thessaloniki. 2014. p. 76.

  56. 56.

    Inokuma H, Raoult D, Brouqui P. Detection of Ehrlichia platys DNA in brown dog ticks (Rhipicephalus sanguineus) in Okinawa Island, Japan. J Clin Microbiol. 2000;38:4219–21.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  57. 57.

    Harvey JW, Simpson CF, Gaskin JM. Cyclic thrombocytopenia induced by a Rickettsia-like agent in dogs. J Infect Dis. 1978;137:182–8.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  58. 58.

    Carrade DD, Foley JE, Borjesson DL, Sykes JE. Canine granulocytic anaplasmosis: a review. J Vet Intern Med. 2009;23:1129–41.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  59. 59.

    Dumler JS, Barbet AF, Bekker CP, Dasch GA, Palmer GH, Ray SC, et al. Reorganization of genera in the families Rickettsiaceae and Anaplasmataceae in the order Rickettsiales: unification of some species of Ehrlichia with Anaplasma, Cowdria with Ehrlichia and Ehrlichia with Neorickettsia, descriptions of six new species combinations and designation of Ehrlichia equi and ‛HGE agentʼ as subjective synonyms of Ehrlichia phagocytophila. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol. 2001;51:2145–65.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  60. 60.

    Springer A, Montenegro VM, Schicht S, Pantchev N, Strube C. Seroprevalence and current infections of canine vector-borne diseases in Nicaragua. Parasit Vectors. 2018;11:585.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  61. 61.

    Mylonakis ME, Koutinas AF, Breitschwerdt EB, Hegarty BC, Billinis CD, Leontides LS, et al. Chronic canine ehrlichiosis (Ehrlichia canis): a retrospective study of 19 natural cases. J Am Anim Hosp Assoc. 2004;40:174–84.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  62. 62.

    Psaroulaki A, Koliou M, Chochlakis D, Ioannou I, Mazeri S, Tselentis Y. Anaplasma phagocytophilum infection in a child. Pediatr Infect Dis J. 2008;27:664–6.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  63. 63.

    Tsiodras S, Spanakis N, Spanakos G, Pervanidou D, Georgakopoulou T, Campos E, et al. Fatal human anaplasmosis associated with macrophage activation syndrome in Greece and the Public Health response. J Infect Public Health. 2017;10:819–23.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  64. 64.

    Matei IA, Ionica AM, D’Amico G, Corduneanu A, Daskalaki AA, Lefkaditis M, et al. Altitude-dependent prevalence of canine granulocytic anaplasmosis in Romania. Vector Borne Zoonotic Dis. 2017;17:147–51.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  65. 65.

    Barbour AG, Hayes SF. Biology of Borrelia species. Microbiol Rev. 1986;50:381–400.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  66. 66.

    Duncan AW, Correa MT, Levine JF, Breitschwerdt EB. The dog as a sentinel for human infection: Prevalence of Borrelia burgdorferi C6 antibodies in dogs from southeastern and mid-Atlantic states. Vector Borne Zoonotic Dis. 2004;4:221–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  67. 67.

    Stamouli M, Totos G, Braun HB, Michel G, Gizaris V. Very low seroprevalence of Lyme borreliosis in young Greek males. Eur J Epidemiol. 2000;16:495–6.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  68. 68.

    Antoniou M, Economou I, Wang X, Psaroulaki A, Spyridaki I, Papadopoulos B, et al. Fourteen-year seroepidemiological study of zoonoses in a Greek village. Am J Trop Med Hyg. 2002;66:80–5.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  69. 69.

    Santino I, Dastoli F, Sessa R, DelPiano M. Geographical incidence of infection with Borrelia burgdorferi in Europe. Panminerva Med. 1997;39:208–14.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references


The authors would like to thank the Hellenic National Meteorological Services (HNMS) for providing the climatologic data, and also all the dog owners and veterinarians who collaborated in this study.


The study was funded by Bayer Animal Health, Leverkusen Germany. The diagnostic kits were kindly donated by IDEXX Laboratories Inc., Westbrook. USA.

Author information




AA: parasitological methods and preparation of the manuscript. GAI: statistical analyses and preparation of the manuscript. NV: data handling and map. NP and RC: critical review of the manuscript. RS and EP: study design and critical review of the manuscript. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Elias Papadopoulos.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate

The study was conducted in compliance with the national animal welfare regulations. The applied diagnostic veterinary procedures are not within the context of relevant EU legislation for animal experimentations (Directive 86/609/EC) and may be performed in order to diagnose animal diseases and improve animal welfare. No suffering was caused during sample collection. Consent was given by owners or registered veterinarians (private, public or municipality, depending on the case). Owners consent was obtained prior to collection of samples according to standard procedures adopted by the involved clinics.

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Competing interests

RS is employed by Bayer but the survey was purely epidemiological without any product use. RC and NP are employed by IDEXX but were not involved in the diagnostic procedure. AA, AIG, NV and EP declare that they have no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver ( applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Angelou, A., Gelasakis, A.I., Verde, N. et al. Prevalence and risk factors for selected canine vector-borne diseases in Greece. Parasites Vectors 12, 283 (2019).

Download citation


  • Vector-borne
  • Dogs
  • Risk factors
  • Climate
  • Altitude
  • Temperature
  • Rainfall
  • Greece


By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate. Please note that comments may be removed without notice if they are flagged by another user or do not comply with our community guidelines.