Skip to main content

Revision of the species composition and distribution of Turkish sand flies using DNA barcodes



Currently, knowledge regarding the phlebotomine sand fly (Diptera: Psychodidae) fauna of Turkey is restricted to regions with endemic leishmaniasis. However, rapidly changing environmental and social conditions highlight concerns on the possible future expansion of sand fly-borne diseases in Turkey, promoting risk assessment through biosurveillance activities in non-endemic regions. Traditional morphological approaches are complicated by extensive cryptic speciation in sand flies, thus integrated studies utilizing DNA markers are becoming increasingly important for correct sand fly identification. This study contributes to the knowledge of the sand fly fauna in understudied regions of Turkey, and provides an extensive DNA barcode reference library of expertly identified Turkish sand fly species for the first time.


Fly sampling was conducted at 101 locations from 29 provinces, covering all three biogeographical regions of Turkey. Specimens were morphologically identified using available keys. Cytochrome c oxidase I (cox1) barcode sequences were analyzed both for morphologically distinct species and those specimens with cryptic identity. A taxon identity tree was obtained using Neighbor Joining (NJ) analysis. Species boundaries among closely related taxa evaluated using ABGD, Maximum Likelihood (ML) and haplotype network analyses. Sand fly richness of all three biogeographical regions were compared using nonparametric species richness estimators.


A total of 729 barcode sequences (including representatives of all previously reported subgenera) were obtained from a total of 9642 sand fly specimens collected in Turkey. Specimens belonging to the same species or species complex clustered together in the NJ tree, regardless of their geographical origin. The species delimitation methods revealed the existence of 33 MOTUs, increasing the previously reported 28 recorded sand fly species by 17.8%. The richest sand fly diversity was determined in Anatolia, followed by the Mediterranean, and then the Black Sea regions of the country.


A comprehensive cox1 reference library is provided for the sand fly species of Turkey, including the proposed novel taxa discovered herein. Our results have epidemiological significance exposing extensive distributions of proven and suspected sand fly vectors in Turkey, including those areas currently regarded as non-endemic for sand fly-borne disease.


Phlebotomine sand flies (Diptera: Psychodidae) are the only proven vectors of leishmaniasis, a group of neglected tropical diseases affecting more than one million people globally each year. Depending on the causative Leishmania species and host’s immunity, the disease manifests itself mainly in two clinical forms: the self-healing cutaneous leishmaniasis (CL) and the potentially lethal visceral leishmaniasis (VL) that are endemic in 85 and 74 countries, respectively [1].

The large landmass of Turkey (783,562 km2), nestled between the temperate and subtropical regions of Europe and near Asia, comprises three distinct biogeographical regions, i.e. Anatolian, the Black Sea, and the Mediterranean, each providing suitable conditions both for sand fly survival and propagation of the etiological disease agents they transmit. Both CL and VL are regarded as endemic in Turkey, with 2000 and 27 average reported annual human infections, respectively [1]. Some 25,369 cases of CL were reported in Turkey between 2005 and 2017, with highest incidences recorded in the Anatolian (56.08%) and Mediterranean (43.86%) regions. Of the reported 207 VL cases in Turkey between 2005 and 2014, over 50% occurred in the Mediterranean region (Turkish Ministry of Health Records, unpublished). Biosurveillance studies undertaken by our team previously highlighted the presence of several phleboviruses, including sand fly fever Turkey virus and Toscana virus, circulating in both the Anatolian and Mediterranean regions [2]. Since 2000, intensive vector incrimination and bionomic studies have been conducted in certain leishmania transmission foci in the Anatolian and in the Mediterranean regions of Turkey [3,4,5,6,7,8]. Undiagnosed human cases are suspected in the Black Sea region [2] yet the sand fly fauna of this region, and many other localities in the Anatolian and Mediterranean regions, remains unstudied.

Morphological identification of sand flies is notoriously difficult, often requiring expert morphological assessment of slide-mounted and/or dissected specimens. The lack of diagnostic characters for females of particular subgenera (e.g. Adlerius) [9], phenotypic plasticity observed in different populations of some species [10, 11], and the commonality of closely-related, sympatric cryptic taxa further amplifies this problem, seriously impeding reliable vector incrimination efforts [12, 13]. These restrictions often result in pathogen screening of sand fly samples without a priori morphological examination of specimens, leading to unreliable vector incrimination [14].

DNA sequence data from several mitochondrial and nuclear loci have been introduced in several studies to mitigate the need for accurate, reliable sand fly identification methods for both taxonomic and epidemiological studies (see [15] for a review). Among these, the DNA barcoding region of the mitochondrial cytochrome c oxidase I (cox1) gene, previously proposed by Hebert et al. [16], has proven highly useful in the differentiation of sand fly species [17,18,19,20]. The increasing availability of DNA barcode reference sequences has allowed retrospective identification of infected sand fly specimens, permitting accurate vector incrimination in high-throughput sand fly biosurveillance studies for the first time [21, 22].

The sand fly fauna of Turkey totals some 28 species to date (Table 1), very few of which have associated DNA sequences. In order to generate a comprehensive cox1 DNA barcoding reference library for Turkish sand flies to facilitate future taxonomic and biosurveillance studies, DNA barcodes were generated from morphologically verified voucher specimens collected from a wide range of localities in all three biogeographical regions in the country. Furthermore, the DNA barcode sequences were used to estimate the comparative sand fly species richness of the three biogeographic regions, evaluate the gene flow between populations of widely distributed species and to determine potential cryptic speciation within the Turkish sand fly fauna. The results are discussed in the context of sand fly-borne disease transmission in the region.

Table 1 The sand fly species previously reported from Turkey and the number of specimens barcoded from the three biogeographical regions in this study


Sampling, specimen identification and sequencing

Between 2005 and 2016, sand flies were collected at 101 locations from 29 provinces in all three biogeographical regions of Turkey (Anatolia, Mediterranean and Black Sea regions). The European Environment Agency guidelines [23] were followed for delimiting the borders of these regions, and the geographical coordinates of the collection localities were visualized in QGIS 2.18.0 (Fig. 1). Adult sand flies were mainly collected using CDC miniature light traps placed in or around domestic animal enclosures closely associated with human dwellings. Depending on the diversity of probable host species and the accessibility of the animal enclosures, one to six traps were set in each location (Additional file 1: Table S1). As the climatic conditions within the same biogeographical region vary widely, the complete developmental threshold degree-day value obtained for Phlebotomus papatasi [24] was utilized to estimate the optimal period of the season for adult emergence for each province. Previously published field data [4, 7, 49] were also considered to optimize the success of the field collections.

Fig. 1

Map indicating the sand fly collection sites and the biogeographical regions of Turkey and the neighboring European countries

Following collection, specimens were stored in 96% ethanol for further analyses. The head and the terminal 2–3 abdominal segments of each specimen were dissected and mounted for morphological identification using the keys available for the adult Old World sand flies [9, 25, 26] while the thorax and the rest of the abdomen was retained in ethanol for DNA extraction. Where possible, ten specimens representing both males and females of each species were selected for DNA barcoding from each province. Additionally, specimens that could only be morphologically assigned to subgenera were also included in the analysis.

DNA was obtained from individual sand flies following a previously documented extraction protocol [12]. The universal LCO1490 and HCO2198 primers [27] were used to amplify the ~650 bp barcoding region of the cox1 gene, using previously defined PCR reaction conditions optimized in our laboratory [28]. Bi-directional sequencing of the purified amplification products was performed using the original PCR primers at RefGen Gene Research and Biotechnology Company (Ankara, Turkey).

Data analysis

The resultant cox1 sequences were aligned using the ClustalW Multiple Alignment algorithm, as implemented in the BioEdit v.7.2.5 [29] alignment editor. Neighbor-Joining (NJ) analysis was conducted on 1000 replicates under the assumptions of Kimura’s two parameter (K2P) substitution model in MEGA v.6.0 [30] in order to obtain a robust taxon identity tree with bootstrapped branch support.

The K2P distances generated through pairwise sequence comparisons using the default settings of P-values (0.1–0.001) in the Automatic Barcode Gap Discovery (ABGD) web-interface program ( [31] were used to assign each barcode sequence into molecular operational taxonomic units (MOTUs). ABGD splits the sequences into groups through two subsequent partitioning. Using a user-defined range of prior intraspecific distance divergence threshold values (P), this method first infers a barcode gap and uses this gap value to partition the data into clusters. In the second step, these clusters are repeatedly partitioned into hypothetical species until no more splits take place [32].

Species boundaries among closely related taxa within each subgenus were further evaluated by Maximum Likelihood (ML) analysis in MEGA v.6.0, using only the unique representative haplotypes, as identified by DnaSP v.5.10.01 [33]. The best-fit evolutionary model for each sub data set was defined using the Smart Model Selection (SMS) software [34]. Parsimony networks using TCS method [35] generated in PopArt [36] and compared with the results obtained by ABGD.

Species richness estimates within biogeographical regions

As the number of traps set and the number of individuals selected for DNA barcoding differed in each biogeographical region, we built provisional species accumulation curves to evaluate the completeness of our sampling effort in EstimateS v.9.1.0. [37]. Using the frequency data of rare species in an assemblage, non-parametric species richness estimators allow estimates of the total species richness, even when the sampling efforts are not complete. The mean values of incidence-based richness estimator Chao2 and the 95% confidence intervals in EstimateS v.9.1.0. were used for the comparison of biogeographical regions in terms of MOTU richness.


A total of 9642 sand flies were collected during the field activities and sand flies were collected at all of the 101 sampling locations, spanning 29 provinces. The morphological analyses of the specimens showed that 15 species and four species complexes (around 90% of the previously documented sand fly fauna of Turkey) were sampled during the study period. cox1 barcode sequences were obtained from 729 specimens, expertly identified as representatives of each traditionally recognized taxon. Specimens belonging to known species complexes (as sensu lato, hereinafter s.l.), as well as the 50 morphologically indistinguishable females of the subgenus Adlerius and three unidentified Paraphlebotomus female specimens, were included in the analyses. The sand fly species previously reported from Turkey and the number of specimens barcoded from each of the three biogeographical regions are shown in Table 1.

After trimming and alignment, the length of the target cox1 sequences ranged from 547 to 630 base pairs. As there were no gaps and stop codons, the data set was revealed to be free of pseudogenes and nuclear insertions of mitochondrial DNA. The NJ analysis of the data revealed that all specimens morphologically determined as belonging to the same species or species complex clustered together, irrespective of geographical origin. Barcode sequences obtained for the 50 unidentifiable Adlerius spp. females allowed retrospective species confirmation of most of these specimens, as they grouped together with their conspecific males. However, a group of females (n = 13) were found to have deeply diverged from all other species analyzed within the subgenus Adlerius, suggesting the presence of another species. Similarly, the three morphologically unidentified Paraphlebotomus females did not adhere to any morphologically verified clusters (Additional file 2: Figure S1).

Using the prior intraspecific divergence threshold value of 1.29%, ABGD assigned the 742 cox1 barcode sequences into 34 distinct groups. Specimens conforming to the morphologically verified species, Phlebotomus papatasi, P. caucasicus, P. jacusieli, P. perfiliewi (s.l.), P. tobbi, P. balcanicus, P. brevis, P. halepensis, P. kyreniae, P. simici, P. anatolicus, P. economidesi and P. killicki, were grouped in individual MOTUs. However, deep intraspecific divergences (mean K2P distance > 0.25) within P. alexandri, P. sergenti (s.l.), P. kandelakii (s.l.), P. major (s.l.), Sergentomyia dentata and S. minuta resulted in the representation of at least two MOTUs in each of these taxa. Two distinct groups were detected within P. alexandri and S. dentata, while P. kandelakii (s.l.), P. sergenti (s.l.) and S. minuta were split into three barcode clusters each. With a mean intraspecific K2P distance of 2.7%, P. major (s.l.) was shown to comprise six distinct groups. In concordance with the results obtained from NJ analysis, the unidentified females of Adlerius sp. (n = 13) and Paraphlebotomus sp. (n = 3) were each grouped in two unique MOTUs.

Subgenus Phlebotomus

DNA barcode sequences were recovered for 56 specimens of P. papatasi, the only species of subgenus Phlebotomus recorded from Turkey. Phlebotomus papatasi is common in the Anatolian and Mediterranean regions but was not detected in collections from the Black Sea region. The final alignment was 630 bp long, and the total number of haplotypes was 46 with a haplotype diversity (Hd) of 0.989 (GenBank: MN086366–MN086411). The ML analysis of the P. papatasi haplotypes under the T92+G model revealed the same results obtained by ABGD, with all sequences grouped in a single clade (Fig. 2). Similarly, TCS identified a single network for all the P. papatasi sequences analyzed. As there were no P. papatasi specimens collected from the Black Sea region, all the haplotypes were generated from representative specimens collected in the Anatolian and Mediterranean regions. Three haplotypes (P. papatasi-11, P. papatasi-25 and P. papatasi-37) were common to both biogeographical regions (Additional file 3: Figure S2).

Fig. 2

Maximum Likelihood (ML) tree constructed for the 46 P. papatasi haplotypes (GenBank accession numbers: MN086366–MN086411) based on mitochondrial cox1 gene region. Bars representing the MOTUs inferred from ABGD (a) and TCS algorithms (b). The bootstrap values higher than 50% are indicated

Subgenus Paraphlebotomus

The aligned matrix of 83 cox1 barcodes obtained for species of subgenus Paraphlebotomus consisted of 603 characters. The 83 specimens were represented by 60 unique cox1 haplotypes (GenBank: MN086412–MN086471) (Hd = 0.989) that fell in two major clades after the ML analysis conducted under the GTR+G+I substitution model. Clade 1 comprised of P. alexandri haplotypes grouped in two well supported lineages. The first lineage was represented with the P. alexandri-1 haplotype, while the rest of the 20 haplotypes was grouped in the second lineage (Fig. 3). In concordance with the ABGD, parsimony network analysis identified two independent networks for P. alexandri data set that also match with the two lineages recovered in the ML analysis. The first network comprised the haplotypes sampled from the three biogeographical regions and three of them (P. alexandri-6, P. alexandri-15 and P. alexandri-17) were shared among the Anatolian and the Mediterranean regions. Originating from the Anatolian region, P. alexandri-1 was the only representative of the second network, although one other haplotype (P. alexandri-13) from the same location was placed in the first network (Additional file 4: Figure S3). The mean K2P distance between these two lineages (7.5%) was comparable with those of morphologically distinguishable species pairs, e.g. P. brevis × P. simici (5.5%) and P. caucasicus × P. jacusieli (4.3%) (Additional file 5: Table S2), suggesting this taxon comprises two distinct species in Turkey.

Fig. 3

Maximum Likelihood (ML) tree constructed for the 60 haplotypes belonging to subgenus Paraphlebotomus (GenBank: MN086412–MN086471) based on mitochondrial cox1 gene region. Bars represent the MOTUs inferred from ABGD (a) and TCS (b) algorithms. The bootstrap values higher than 50% are indicated

The second clade within the subgenus Paraphlebotomus was comprised of the well supported lineages representing P. sergenti (s.l.), P. caucasicus, Paraphlebotomus sp. and P. jacusieli (Fig. 3). Supporting the recursive partitioning of the data by ABGD, P. sergenti (s.l.) was divided into three lineages, also defined as three independent networks by TCS. Most of the haplotypes originating from the Mediterranean region as well as all the haplotypes from the Black Sea and the Anatolian region were grouped in the first network. Only one haplotype, P. sergenti-18, within this network was shared between the Anatolian and the Mediterranean regions. Six haplotypes from the same province of the Mediterranean region were grouped in the second and third networks that are concordant with the second and third lineages in the ML tree (Additional file 4: Figure S3). The mean K2P distances between the three lineages of P. sergenti (s.l.) were found to be substantially higher (2.7–5.0%) than those yielded for within these lineages (0.2–1.1%) (Additional file 5: Table S2). The two specimens of Anatolian P. caucasicus were represented by a single haplotype that was clearly diverged from the morphologically unidentified Paraphlebotomus sp. haplotypes from the Black Sea region (mean interspecific K2P distance = 3.7%). Despite its low numbers in catches (n = 7), P. jacusieli appears to be widely distributed, and was placed as the sister species of P. caucasicus and Paraphlebotomus sp. in the ML tree. Similarly, TCS sorted these three taxa in distinct networks (Additional file 4: Figure S3).

Subgenus Larroussius

In total, 424 cox1 barcode sequences were obtained for the Larroussius species distributed in Turkey. Some 181 unique haplotypes (Hd = 0.956) were detected in the 594 base pair aligned sub-set (GenBank: MN086472–MN086652). The ML analysis conducted under the GTR substitution model separated all the morphologically recognized taxa clearly (Fig. 4). In concordance with the ABGD results, P. tobbi haplotypes were grouped together in a single clade. This was further supported by TCS that linked all the geographically distinct haplotypes of P. tobbi in a single network. Three haplotypes were shared across all three biogeographical regions (P. tobbi-41, P. tobbi-51 and P. tobbi-53), while three others (P. tobbi-27, P. tobbi-52 and P. tobbi-55) were present only in the Anatolian and the Mediterranean regions. Both P. tobbi-1 and P. tobbi-13 haplotypes were found only in the Anatolian and the Black Sea regions (Additional file 6: Figure S4).

Fig. 4

Maximum Likelihood (ML) tree constructed for the 181 haplotypes belonging to subgenus Larroussius (GenBank: MN086472–MN086652) based on mitochondrial cox1 gene region. Bars represent the MOTUs inferred from ABGD (a) and TCS (b) algorithms. The bootstrap values higher than 50% are indicated

The 96 P. perfiliewi (s.l.) barcodes (50 haplotypes) formed a single group in the ML tree, congruent with both the recursive partitioning of the complete data set by ABGD, as well as the single network identified by the parsimony network analysis. P. perfiliewi (s.l.)-15 and P. perfiliewi (s.l.)-16 were the most common haplotypes in the network, (Additional file 7: Figure S5).

The grouping pattern of the 53 haplotypes produced for 169 P. major (s.l.) specimens in the ML tree was reflective of the results obtained by the TCS. The first network comprised the haplotypes from all the three biogeographical regions with P. major-5 shared between all the regions and P. major-1 occurring both in the Anatolian and in the Mediterranean regions. The second network included the haplotypes only from the Mediterranean region, with P. major-23 identified as the most frequent haplotype in this network. With a restricted distribution in the Anatolian region, P. major-28 and P. major-29 were grouped in the third network, while two haplotypes from the Black Sea region (P. major-30 and P. major-32) and one from the Anatolian region (P. major-31) were included in the fourth network. The final network was consisted of the haplotypes distributed in all the three biogeographical regions. The haplotype P. major-47 was the most common, present in all regions, but predominated in the Mediterranean. Two haplotypes (P. major-35 and P. major-43) are shared in the Anatolian and the Mediterranean regions (Additional file 8: Figure S6). The mean K2P distances between the five lineages recovered in the ML analysis ranged between 4.1–9.1% (Additional file 5: Table S2). The barcode clusters generated by ABGD were in concordance with the ML and TCS results, except one haplotype (P. major-27) grouped in the second network was assigned to an independent cluster.

Three lineages were identified within the 20 P. kandelakii (s.l.) haplotypes included in the ML analysis. The mean K2P distances between these lineages (2.4–8.6%) were higher than those yielded for within lineages (0.00–0.07%). Parsimony network analysis generated three independent networks concordant with the distinct lineages of P. kandelakii (s.l.) in the ML tree. The first two networks included the haplotypes originating from specimens from the Anatolian region, while the third comprised the haplotypes distributed both in the Black Sea and the Mediterranean regions. No haplotypes were shared between regions (Additional file 9: Figure S7).

Subgenus Adlerius

cox1 barcodes were obtained for all Adlerius species reported from Turkey to date. The length of the final alignment was 547 bp, and a total of 65 haplotypes were produced with a haplotype diversity (Hd) of 0.985 (GenBank: MN086653–MN086717). Congruent with the ABGD results, the ML analysis conducted under the GTR+G+I model recovered six well supported lineages located in two main clades (Fig. 5). Distributed in the Anatolian and Black Sea regions, P. simici represented the first lineage of the Adlerius phylogeny. A single network was identified for the 37 haplotypes; haplotypes P. simici-1 and P. simici-16 were shared between the two regions (Additional file 10: Figure S8). Three haplotypes of P. brevis and seven haplotypes of unidentified Adlerius sp. were grouped in two distinct lineages and placed as the sister taxa of P. simici in the first clade. Similarly, the parsimony network analysis grouped the P. brevis and Adlerius sp. haplotypes in two independents networks, the former being restricted in the Mediterranean region while the latter occurring only in the Anatolian region (Additional file 10: Figure S8).

Fig. 5

Maximum Likelihood (ML) tree constructed for the 65 haplotypes belonging to subgenus Adlerius (GenBank: MN086653–MN086717) based on mitochondrial cox1 gene region. Bars represent the MOTUs inferred from ABGD (a) and TCS (b) algorithms. The bootstrap values higher than 50% are indicated

The second clade included three lineages that correspond to P. kyreniae, P. balcanicus, and P. halepensis. Phlebotomus kyreniae was represented by three haplotypes from the Anatolian region, whereas P. balcanicus lineage included only two haplotypes from the Mediterranean region. Distributed both in the Anatolian and in the Black Sea regions, P. halepensis appeared as the sister species of P. balcanicus and P. kyreniae in the second clade of the ML tree. TCS identified unique networks for each of these species (Additional file 10: Figure S8).

Subgenus Transphlebotomus

The internal systematics of the subgenus Transphlebotomus using multi-locus DNA regions (including cox1) have been previously assessed [18]. Here, two additional cox1 sequences (GenBank: MN086718–MN086719) generated from females collected in the Mediterranean region were compared with our previously published sequences (GenBank: KR336623–KR336631), and were identified as P. anatolicus and P. killicki. ABGD assigned the Transphlebotomus haplotypes into three groups, in concordant with the ML (using the GTR+G substitution model) and parsimony network analyses, and with our previous findings (Fig. 6, Additional file 11: Figure S9).

Fig. 6

Maximum Likelihood (ML) tree constructed for the 10 haplotypes belonging to subgenus Transphlebotomus (GenBank: MN086718–MN086719) based on mitochondrial cox1 gene region. Previously published sequences appear with corresponding GenBank accession numbers. Bars represent the MOTUs inferred from ABGD (a) and TCS (b) algorithms. The bootstrap values higher than 50% are indicated

Subgenus Sergentomyia

In total, 63 cox1 sequences were generated from two morpho-species of Sergentomyia from Turkey, resulting in 54 haplotypes (Hd = 0.99) in the final 607 bp alignment (GenBank: MN086720–MN086773). The ML analysis conducted using the T93+G substitution model resulted in two well-supported clades. The first clade included Mediterranean S. dentata populations which divided into two distinct lineages; these groupings were supported by the two independent networks recovered in the TCS analysis and two unique barcode clusters generated by the ABGD. The second clade comprised the S. minuta haplotypes grouped into three lineages with varying bootstrap supports, congruent with the recursive partitioning results of ABGD and independent networks generated by TCS. With the exception of S. minuta-2 from the Anatolian region, all haplotypes were restricted in the Mediterranean region (Fig. 7, Additional file 12: Figure S10).

Fig. 7

Maximum Likelihood (ML) tree constructed for the 54 haplotypes belonging to Sergentomyia subgenus (GenBank: MN086720–MN086773) based on mitochondrial cox1 gene region. Bars represent the MOTUs inferred from ABGD (a) and TCS (b) algorithms. The bootstrap values higher than 50% are indicated

Species richness estimates

We assessed the completeness of our sampling effort using the accumulation curve for all 718 barcode sequences and 33 MOTUs recovered using all three methodologies (ABGD, ML and parsimony network analyses). The barcode sequences of 24 P. major (s.l.) specimens were excluded in this analysis as we only used these specimens for molecular identification and do not have any data regarding the species composition of the localities from where they were collected.

The Chao2 estimator proposed 34.99 (95% CI: 33.28–46.91) sand fly species in Turkey and the incidence-based accumulation curve for the whole dataset suggested that our sampling was almost complete. Although the accumulation curve for sand flies of the Mediterranean region reached an asymptote, indicating the fauna is well sampled, the species richness of the Anatolian and the Black Sea regions requires more sampling (Fig. 8). For the Mediterranean region, the Chao2 estimator of 23.33 (95% CI: 23.02–28.92) closely aligned with the 23 MOTUs revealed in our analysis. However, the Chao2 estimates of 26.31 (95% CI: 20.29–60.54) and 16.9 (95% CI: 11.93–48.35) for the Anatolian and the Black Sea regions, respectively, were much higher than the 19 and 11 MOTUs we determined in our field collections, suggesting our sampling here is far from complete. The distribution of the MOTUs observed in the three biogeographical regions is illustrated in Additional file 13: Figure S11.

Fig. 8

MOTU accumulation curves for a Turkey (complete data set), b the Mediterranean biogeographical region, c the Anatolian biogeographical region and d the Black Sea biogeographical region


Accurate identification of sand fly specimens is critical to better understanding of sand fly-pathogen interactions, correct determination of associated bionomics and substantiated risk assessments of sand fly-transmitted diseases. Morphological identification remains the keystone of sand fly taxonomy, but the integration of molecular data is vital in solving taxonomic problems and determining species-diagnostic bionomic traits. To our knowledge, this study comprises the first comprehensive attempt to determine the utility of DNA barcoding for the robust identification of Turkish sand fly fauna, and expands our knowledge of sand fly composition and distribution in previously unstudied regions of the country. Furthermore, this study provides an extensive morphologically-verified DNA barcode reference library, which will be of interest to sand fly researchers in Europe and in the Middle East.

Prior to this study, 28 species were reported in Turkey, representing two genera and six subgenera. Phlebotomus papatasi, the vector of L. major in North Africa and the Middle East, is the sole representative of the subgenus Phlebotomus in Turkey. Irrespective of species delimitation algorithm applied, P. papatasi specimens collected from the Anatolian and the Mediterranean regions appeared in one cluster, supporting earlier studies that showed continuous gene flow between the distinct geographical populations over a wide distributional range [38, 39].

Most Turkish Paraphlebotomus sand flies are proven vectors of leishmaniasis in the Old World. Phlebotomus alexandri (distributed from Spain across to China and down to southern Ethiopia) is responsible for transmitting pathogens in the Leishmania donovani complex [40]. Two highly divergent lineages were detected in Turkish P. alexandri samples: the first exhibited shared haplotypes between all three regions, and low mean intra-lineage genetic distances (0.4%), indicative of continual interchange between populations. The second lineage represented by a single Anatolian sample collected in sympatry with P. alexandri lineage 1, showed 7.5% sequence divergence from the first, highly suggestive of cryptic speciation within this taxon in Turkey. Comparison of all publically available cox1 barcodes of P. alexandri from different countries determined that the most common Turkish haplotype clustered with one specimen from Israel (GenBank: KF483668), while the unique, highly divergent specimen grouped readily with P. alexandri specimens from Algeria (GenBank: KJ481082, KJ481085, KJ481092–KJ481093, KJ481095) and China (KF137558–KF137559). Sequences from topotypic P. alexandri are essential to ascertain the true identity of P. alexandri (s.s.) and more specimens are needed to evaluate the diversification of this taxon across its range.

Phlebotomus (Paraphlebotomus) sergenti (s.l.) is the proven vector of Leishmania tropica in several Middle Eastern and African countries, as well as in Turkey [3, 40]. Significant morphological variation has been reported in P. sergenti across its Old World distribution, and it has long been suggested that P. sergenti comprises a cryptic species complex [41]. Several genetic studies have reported distinct mitochondrial and nuclear lineages that do not correlate with the proposed variant morphotypes [10, 41,42,43]. In Turkey, the widely distributed P. sergenti (s.l.) comprises three distinct lineages (2.7–5.0% cox1 sequence differences), the first of which is ubiquitous across Turkey and clusters with Algerian samples (GenBank: KJ481066–KJ481068, KJ481071) [43], and the second and third lineages restricted to one province located in the northwestern part of the Mediterranean region. Although a closely related taxon, Phlebotomus similis, has been also reported in Turkey, its presence is controversial. None of the P. sergenti lineages sequenced here matched P. similis sequences available from Crete, suggesting these two additional lineages may represent additional biodiversity within the previously defined P. sergenti species complex [44].

Phlebotomus (Paraphlebotomus) caucasicus, the vector of L. major in Afghanistan and the suspected vector of zoonotic cutaneous leishmaniasis in Iran, has been recently reported from the Northeastern Anatolian region. We collected this species only in close proximity to the original report, and in low numbers, suggesting this is a rare species. cox1 barcodes (n = 2) generated here clearly differentiated this taxa from other Paraphlebotomus species with mean genetic distances of 4.3–18.3%. A group of unconfirmed Paraphlebotomus sp. females in the Black Sea region were placed as the sister species of P. caucasicus in the ML analysis and regarded unique by ABGD and TCS algorithms. Re-examination of the voucher slides confirmed unique characters of the spermatheca, further evidencing this hitherto undescribed diversity within P. caucasicus.

The non-vector Phlebotomus (Paraphlebotomus) jacusieli is widely distributed in the Middle East and Caucasia, and has previously been reported in the Anatolian and Mediterranean regions of Turkey. Here, to the best of our knowledge, we document its presence in the Black Sea Region for the first time.

Species of the subgenus Larroussius are regarded as the main vectors of L. infantum in the Mediterranean. Phlebotomus tobbi is the proven vector of L. infantum in the Mediterranean region of Turkey [5, 45] and in Cyprus [46], and is the suspected vector in Albania, Greece and Iran [40, 47, 48]. Our studies show that P. tobbi is a single abundant, genetically diverse (58 cox1 haplotypes in 107 samples sequenced) species, which is common across all three biogeographical regions of Turkey. Analysis of publicly available P. tobbi samples from Cyprus (GenBank: KX826025, KX826041), Greece (GenBank: KU519502, KU519503, KT634317) and Israel (GenBank: KF483675) further confirms that P. tobbi comprises a single, widely-dispersed species across the Mediterranean Basin, without evidence of significant geographical structuring.

Populations of P. (Larroussius) perfiliewi (s.l.) are proven or suspected vectors of L. infantum in Europe and in the Middle East. Three essentially allopatric species (P. galilaeus, P. perfiliewi and P. transcaucasicus) comprise the P. perfiliewi complex; females are isomorphic, and male characteristics appear to vary by geographical origin [11]. Phlebotomus perfiliewi is the most widely distributed species with records from Crimea to North Africa and in many European countries, P. galilaeus is reported from Cyprus and Israel, and P. transcaucasicus is restricted to Caucasia and Central Asia. Turkey is the only known country where these species purportedly occur in sympatry [4, 6, 49]. However, in the 96 P. perfiliewi specimens sampled herein, all were identified as a single taxon (P. perfiliewi) in all three species delimitation methods, with a mean genetic distance of 1.1%.

The Phlebotomus (Larroussius) major complex comprises six morphologically similar and largely allopatric species (P. neglectus, P. notus, P. major, P. syriacus, P. wenyoni and P. wui). Phlebotomus neglectus and P. syriacus are only sympatric in the Middle East, including Turkey [12, 50]. Previously, our studies confirmed this sympatry and suggested the existence of a possible third taxon, using genetic data from the mitochondrial cytochrome oxidase b (Cyt-b) gene and the nuclear marker elongation factor (EF-1α) [12]. Here we confirm the extensive geographical distribution of P. major (s.l.) throughout the country, and further confirm the existence of the previously described members of this species complex (P. neglectus, P. syriacus and the third provisional taxon) and the distribution of two additional lineages of P. major complex in Turkey. cox1 barcode sequences of 169 P. major (s.l.) specimens from across Turkey were evaluated, including those specimens analyzed in the previous study [12]. Corresponding to the first lineage of the ‘Major Group’ in the ML tree of the subgenus Larroussius (Fig. 4), P. neglectus is widely distributed, occurring in all three biogeographical regions of Turkey. Supporting our previous results, the distribution of P. syriacus (lineage 2 herein) is restricted within the southeastern parts of the Mediterranean region while the fifth lineage of the P. major complex (corresponding to the third proposed taxon in our previous study) has an extensive distribution throughout the country. The newly described third lineage occurs only in the Anatolian region, and the fourth is distributed in both in the Anatolian and Black Sea Regions. The TCS analysis corroborated the five distinct ML groups, but the ABGD analysis sorted one of the haplotypes (P. major-27) into an additional (sixth) group. This could be resolved with additional sampling, or could be attributed to the sensitivity of ABGD to the variation in the number of specimens analyzed in each species [32, 51]. As the biomedical importance of P. major (s.l.) is well documented [52,53,54], the robust discrimination between its component members is crucial for vector incrimination studies. The morphological characters were shown to be insufficient for a specific delimitation [12, 50] but high interspecific genetic distances between the five lineages distributed in Turkey (4.1–13.0%) suggests that cox1 barcoding is a useful method to discriminate between the members of the ‘Major Group’. Further comparative analysis of the additional nuclear markers and ecological data is necessary to clarify the taxonomic status of its sympatric members.

Phlebotomus (Larroussius) kandelakii is the proven vector of L. infantum in Georgia [55] and its potential role in VL transmission has been implicated in other several countries (reviewed in [40] and [56]), including Turkey [6]. Phlebotomus kandelakii (s.l.) comprises two described taxa: Phlebotomus burneyi is thought to be restricted to Pakistan, while P. kandelakii is found from Caucasia to the Middle East, and from Afghanistan to eastern Europe [57] and both occur in sympatry in Turkey [49, 58]. Members of P. kandelakii (s.l.) were collected in all three biogeographical regions of Turkey and the 52 cox1 sequences (20 haplotypes) formed three distinct groups by ABGD, TCS and ML analysis. The first two lineages comprised only haplotypes from the Anatolian populations, while the third lineage represented specimens from both the Black Sea and the Mediterranean regions. The haplotypes in lineage 2 shared 98.76–99.29% sequence similarity to P. kandelakii from Azerbaijan (GenBank: KY564178, KY564179 and KY564184). The purported differentiating male morpho-characters (e.g. paramere structure and the number of ascoids on certain antennal segments) are difficult to observe in these taxa, and females are isomorphic [9, 26], thus we were not able to assign species names with confidence to any of the three P. kandelakii lineages at this stage. Evaluation of the DNA sequences of P. burneyi and P. kandelakii from the type-localities in Georgia and Pakistan, respectively, is needed to concretely verify the identity and the taxonomic status of these taxa with respect to those found in Turkey.

Although the vectorial role of species in the subgenus Adlerius in Leishmania transmission has long been suspected, only a few species have been incriminated as leishmaniasis vectors. This is partly due to the inherent problems regarding the discrimination of the isomorphic females. Species identification therefore relies on male morphology, but the sympatric occurrence of different species complicates the vector incrimination studies. Of the 20 described sand fly species in the subgenus Adlerius, only five are reported from Turkey, none of which are regarded as biomedically important. Phlebotomus simici is a suspected vector of VL across its range (Middle East, eastern Mediterranean countries and Caucasia) [59, 60]. All 37 P. simici specimens collected from the Anatolian and the Mediterranean regions formed in a single cluster by all species delimitation methods. To our knowledge, there are no published data regarding the intraspecific variation of P. simici, but our results indicated that this widespread species is represented by a single lineage in Turkey, with a low intraspecific K2P distance (1.1%). Phlebotomus brevis, another suspected vector of L. infantum, has been reported from Greece, Malta, Turkey, Iran and Caucasia. In concordance with the previous records from Turkey [3, 49], P. brevis was notably rare in our collections. Resultant barcodes from our three specimens from the westernmost and southwestern localities of the Mediterranean region clustered tightly, and were clearly separated from their consubgeners. Similarly, P. balcanicus and P. kyreniae were rare, and restricted to only specific locations in the Mediterranean and in the Anatolian regions, respectively. Phlebotomus balcanicus is the proven vector of VL in Georgia and P. kyreniae is a suspected vector of L. infantum in Cyprus. Despite their morphological resemblance, these two species were grouped in independent clusters and appeared as sister taxa in the ML tree of the subgenus Adlerius. Widely distributed in Eurasia (Middle East, Caucasia and Turkey), P. halepensis is a suspected vector of leishmaniasis and has been experimentally indicated as a competent species for both types of the disease [61]. All methods identified a single group for the P. halepensis specimens (n = 34) from the Anatolian and the Black Sea regions, and the ML analysis revealed a single lineage for the 20 haplotypes analyzed without any sign of significant population structuring (intraspecific K2P distance = 1.0%). Importantly, we were able to assign most of the isomorphic Adlerius female specimens to species, irrespective of their geographical origin. Neither the sympatric occurrence of different species, nor the geographical distance between the sampling locations of the same species, influenced the specific discrimination between the females and we were able to provide the barcode sequences for each of the Adlerius taxa distributed in Turkey, based on female specimens. However, the identity of the lineage including seven Adlerius haplotypes from the Anatolian region which clustered as the sister species of P. brevis from the Mediterranean region, remain unresolved.

Five Turkish species belong to the subgenus Transphlebotomus, but their vectorial status remains unknown. Phlebotomus mascittii is widely distributed in Mediterranean countries [49, 62, 63], stretching into Central Europe [64,65,66] as far north as Slovakia [67]. Recently, P. mascittii was verified in Serbia [68] and Slovenia [69] using cox1 barcodes and other DNA markers. Despite targeted collections in Anatolian and Mediterranean provinces where P. mascittii was previously recorded [3, 49], the species was not detected, and the prior records of P. mascittii in Turkey remains questionable. The distributions of the other Transphlebotomus species appear more focused: P. canaaniticus is found in the Middle East [70,71,72], and P. economidesi, previously reported only from Cyprus [73], was recently described in sympatry with P. anatolicus and P. killicki in Turkey [18]. Herein, cox1 barcodes of two specimens collected from the Mediterranean region were molecularly confirmed as P. anatolicus and P. killicki. The first record of P. killicki in Cyprus was also verified based on cox1 sequence correlation [20].

The role of Sergentomyia spp. in the transmission of mammalian diseases is debatable [74], but they are recognized as the vectors of Sauraleishmania parasites that affect reptiles [75]. Sergentomyia antennata, S. dentata, S. minuta and S. theodori are reported from Turkey, and Sauroleishmania spp. DNA was detected in S. dentata in southwestern Turkey [4, 45]. All Sergentomyia specimens collected during this study were identified as S. dentata or S. minuta by morphology. Two cox1 barcode clusters were determined in the 26 S. dentata haplotypes from the Mediterranean region that closely correlate to the geographical origin of the specimens: one from populations in the western part of the Mediterranean region, and the other from the southern localities of the same region. With the exception of one specimen from the Anatolian region, all S. minuta specimens barcoded were from the Mediterranean region. Regardless of the geographical locations of the sampling stations, three barcode clusters were generated for the 28 S. minuta haplotypes we analyzed with an interspecific genetic distance range of 3.0–4.1%. Deep mitochondrial intraspecific variation in S. minuta has been recently reported. Analysis of concatenated mtDNA cytb-cox1 sequences of S. minuta from across Europe and North Africa determined four distinct lineages, irrespective of their geographical origins [76]. Conversely, S. minuta specimens from Crete, Cyprus and mainland Greece clustered in three distinct lineages by locality [20]. Distributed across all three continents of the Old World, S. minuta exhibits morphologically diverse populations. Whether these populations represent different subspecies is controversial (see review in [76]). It is evident that S. minuta is not a molecularly or morphologically homogenous species, but its true taxonomic status is likely only to be clarified following molecular analysis of specimens across its entire distributional range.

Using the cox1 barcode sequences, 33 distinct genetic clusters (MOTUs) of sand flies were identified, increasing the documented number of Turkish species based in taxonomic approaches by at least five species. Non-parametric richness estimator (Chao2) suggested the existence of two additional species, which may correspond to S. antennata and S. theodori that we did not detect during our survey, but that have previously been reported in the country. Sand fly biodiversity appears highest in the Anatolian region (26 MOTUs), followed by the Mediterranean region (23 MOTUs), and then the Black Sea region (17 MOTUs). As indicated by Chao2, we did not recover the expected species richness either in the Anatolian or Black Sea regions, but captured the diversity of the Mediterranean sand fly fauna appropriately. It is evident that including more sampling locations will be helpful to discover the undetected species/MOTUs present in these regions.


The comprehensive DNA barcode reference library of Turkish sand fly diversity generated in this study will greatly contribute to the accurate identification of sand flies in entomological, ecological and epidemiological studies in Turkey and beyond. In addition, this study presents novel distribution data of proven or probable sand fly vectors in the Black Sea region for the first time. The extensive distribution of P. tobbi and P. sergenti (s.l.), the proven vectors of leishmaniasis, along with other medically important Larroussius taxa in Turkey, highlights the importance of ongoing surveillance studies to evaluate the sand fly-borne disease risk in previously overlooked parts of the country. The discriminatory power of DNA barcoding for the robust identification of the morphologically unidentifiable specimens, e.g. Adlerius females, is invaluable in vector incrimination studies. Our results confirm the utility of cox1 DNA barcoding for the robust identification of sand flies, and for revealing cryptic genetic diversity within these taxa. Future multi-locus DNA studies integrated with ecological and behavioral criteria is now crucial for delimiting species boundaries in genetically diverse taxa, especially where introgression events are possible.

Availability of data and materials

Data supporting the conclusions of this article are included within the article and its additional files. The unique cox1 haplotypes obtained for all sand fly species from Turkey were deposited in GenBank under the Accession Numbers MN086366–MN086773.



Automatic Barcode Gap Discovery program


Centre of Disease Control and Prevention


cytochrome c oxidase subunit 1


cutaneous leishmaniasis


elongation factor 1-alpha


Kimura’s two parameter


Maximum Likelihood


molecular operational taxonomic unit


Neighbor Joining


polymerase chain reaction


visceral leishmaniasis


  1. 1.

    WHO. Surveillance of leishmaniasis in the WHO European Region, 2016. Geneva: World Health Organization; 2018.

    Google Scholar 

  2. 2.

    Ergunay K, Ayhan N, Charrel RN. Novel and emergent sandfly-borne phleboviruses in Asia Minor: a systematic review. Rev Med Virol. 2017;27:e1898.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. 3.

    Volf P, Ozbel Y, Akkafa F, Svobodova M, Votýpka J, Chang K. Sand flies (Diptera: Phlebotominae) in Sanliurfa, Turkey: relationship of Phlebotomus sergenti with the epidemic of anthroponotic cutaneous leishmaniasis. J Med Entomol. 2002;39:12–5.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  4. 4.

    Simsek FM, Alten B, Caglar SS, Ozbel Y, Aytekin AM, Kaynas S, et al. Distribution and altitudinal structuring of phlebotomine sand flies (Diptera: Psychodidae) in southern Anatolia, Turkey: their relation to human cutaneous leishmaniasis. J Vector Ecol. 2007;32:269–80.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. 5.

    Svobodova M, Alten B, Zidkova L, Dvorak V, Hlavacková J, Myskova J. Cutaneous leishmaniasis caused by Leishmania infantum transmitted by Phlebotomus tobbi. Int J Parasitol. 2009;39:251–6.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. 6.

    Sari B, Limoncu ME, Balcioglu IC, Aldemir A, Tasci GT, Kiliç Y, et al. Seroepidemiological and entomological survey in a new focus of zoonotic visceral leishmaniasis in Kars Province, Northeastern Turkey. Vet Parasitol. 2015;209:179–87.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. 7.

    Alten B, Maia C, Afonso MO, Campino L, Jimenez M, Gonzalez E, et al. Seasonal dynamics of phlebotomine sand fly species proven vectors of Mediterranean leishmaniasis caused by Leishmania infantum. PLoS Negl Trop Dis. 2016;10:e0004458.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. 8.

    Karakus M, Arserim SK, Kasap OE, Pekagirbaş M, Akuzum D, Alten B, et al. Vector and reservoir surveillance study in a canine and human leishmaniasis endemic area in most western part of Turkey, Karaburun. Acta Trop. 2019;190:177–82.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. 9.

    Lewis DJ. A taxonomic review of the genus Phlebotomus (Diptera: Psychodidae). Bull Br Mus Nat Hist. 1982;45:171–209.

    Google Scholar 

  10. 10.

    Moin-Vaziri V, Depaquit J, Yaghoobi-Ershadi M, Oshaghi M, Derakhshandeh-Peykar P, Ferté H, et al. Intraspecific variation within Phlebotomus sergenti Parrot (1917) (Diptera: Psychodidae) based on mtDNA sequences in Islamic Republic of Iran. Acta Trop. 2007;102:29–37.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  11. 11.

    Depaquit J, Bounamous A, Akhoundi M, Augot D, Sauvage F, Dvorak V. A taxonomic study of Phlebotomus (Larroussius) perfiliewi s.l. Infect Genet Evol. 2013;20:500–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. 12.

    Kasap OE, Votýpka J, Alten B. The distribution of the Phlebotomus major complex (Diptera: Psychodidae) in Turkey. Acta Trop. 2013;127:204–11.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. 13.

    Bauzer L, Souza N, Maingon R, Peixoto A. Lutzomyia longipalpis in Brazil: a complex or a single species? A mini-review. Mem Inst Oswaldo Cruz. 2007;102:1–12.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. 14.

    Alten B, Ozbel Y, Ergunay K, Kasap OE, Cull B, Antoniou M, et al. Sampling strategies for phlebotomine sand flies (Diptera: Psychodidae) in Europe. Bull Entomol Res. 2015;105:664–78.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  15. 15.

    Depaquit J. Molecular systematics applied to phlebotomine sandflies: Review and perspectives. Infect Genet Evol. 2014;28:744–56.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. 16.

    Hebert P, Cywinska A, Ball S, Dewaard J. Biological identifications through DNA barcodes. Proc Biol Sci. 2003;270:313–21.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  17. 17.

    Kumar NP, Srinivasan R, Jambulingam P. DNA barcoding for identification of sand flies (Diptera: Psychodidae) in India. Mol Ecol Resources. 2012;12:414–20.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  18. 18.

    Kasap OE, Dvorak V, Depaquit J, Alten B, Votypka J, Volf P. Phylogeography of the subgenus Transphlebotomus Artemiev with description of two new species, Phlebotomus anatolicus n sp and Phlebotomus killicki n sp. Infect Genet Evol. 2015;34:467–79.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. 19.

    Pinto I, da Chagas BD, Rodrigues AAF, Ferreira AL, Rezende HR, Bruno RV, et al. DNA barcoding of Neotropical sand flies (Diptera, Psychodidae, Phlebotominae): species identification and discovery within Brazil. PLoS One. 2015;10:e0140636.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. 20.

    Dokianakis E, Tsirigotakis N, Christodoulou V, Poulakakis N, Antoniou M. Identification of wild-caught phlebotomine sand flies from Crete and Cyprus using DNA barcoding. Parasit Vectors. 2018;11:94.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. 21.

    Ergunay K, Kasap OE, Orsten S, Oter K, Gunay F, Yoldar AZA, et al. Phlebovirus and Leishmania detection in sandflies from eastern Thrace and northern Cyprus. Parasit Vectors. 2014;7:575.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. 22.

    Ayhan N, Alten B, Ivovic V, Dvořák V, Martinkovic F, Omeragic J, et al. Direct evidence for an expanded circulation area of the recently identified Balkan virus (Sandfly fever Naples virus species) in several countries of the Balkan archipelago. Parasit Vectors. 2017;10:402.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. 23.

    European Environment Agency. Biogeographical Regions. 2016. Accessed 18 Oct 2018.

  24. 24.

    Kasap OE, Alten B. Laboratory estimation of degree-day developmental requirements of Phlebotomus papatasi (Diptera: Psychodidae). J Vector Ecol. 2005;30:328.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. 25.

    Theodor OE. Psychodidae-Phlebotominae. Lindner E., editor. Die Fliegen Der Palearktischen Region. Stuttgart, Germany: Schweizrbart’sche; 1958. p. 1–55

  26. 26.

    Artemiev M. A revision of sandflies of the subgenus Adlerius (Diptera, Phlebotommae, Phlebotomus). Zool Zhurn. 1980;59:1177–92.

    Google Scholar 

  27. 27.

    Folmer O, Black M, Hoeh W, et al. DNA primers for amplification of mitochondrial cytochrome c oxidase subunit I from diverse metazoan invertebrates. Mol Mar Biol Biotechnol. 1994;3:294–9.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. 28.

    Gunay F, Alten B, Simsek F, Aldemir A, Linton Y-M. Barcoding Turkish Culex mosquitoes to facilitate arbovirus vector incrimination studies reveals hidden diversity and new potential vectors. Acta Trop. 2015;143:112–20.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. 29.

    Hall TA. BioEdit: a user-friendly biological sequence alignment editor and analysis program for Windows 95/98/NT. Nucleic Acids Symp Ser. 1999;41:95–8.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  30. 30.

    Tamura K, Stecher G, Peterson D, Filipski A, Kumar S. MEGA6: Molecular evolutionary genetics analysis version 6.0. Mol Biol Evol. 2013;30:2725–9.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  31. 31.

    Puillandre N, Lambert A, Brouillet S, Achaz G. ABGD. 2012. Accessed 10 Feb 2019.

  32. 32.

    Puillandre N, Lambert A, Brouillet S, Achaz G. ABGD, automatic barcode gap discovery for primary species delimitation. Mol Ecol. 2012;21:1864–77.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  33. 33.

    Librado P, Rozas J. DnaSP v5: a software for comprehensive analysis of DNA polymorphism data. Bioinformatics. 2009;25:1451.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  34. 34.

    Lefort V, Longueville J-E, Gascuel O. SMS: smart model selection in PhyML. Mol Biol Evol. 2017;34:2422–4.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  35. 35.

    Leigh JW, Bryant D. PopART: full feature software for haplotype network construction. Methods Ecol Evol. 2015;6:1110–6.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. 36.

    Leigh, JW. PopART (Population Analysis with Reticulate Trees). 2015. Accessed 10 Feb 2018.

  37. 37.

    Colwell R. EstimateS: Statistical estimation of species richness and shared species from samples. Version 9 and earlier. User’s guide and application. Storrs: University of Connecticut; 2013.

    Google Scholar 

  38. 38.

    Hamarsheh O, Presber W, Abdeen Z, Sawalha S, Al-Lahem A, Schönian G. Genetic structure of Mediterranean populations of the sandfly Phlebotomus papatasi by mitochondrial cytochrome b haplotype analysis. Med Vet Entomol. 2007;21:270–7.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  39. 39.

    Depaquit J, Lienard E, Verzeaux-Griffon A, Ferté H, Bounamous A, Gantier J-C, et al. Molecular homogeneity in diverse geographical populations of Phlebotomus papatasi (Diptera, Psychodidae) inferred from ND4 mtDNA and ITS2 rDNA: epidemiological consequences. Infect Genet Evol. 2008;8:159–70.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  40. 40.

    Maroli M, Feliciangeli M, Bichaud L, Charrel R, Gradoni L. Phlebotomine sandflies and the spreading of leishmaniases and other diseases of public health concern. Med Vet Entomol. 2013;27:123–47.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  41. 41.

    Depaquit J, Ferté H, Léger N, Lefranc F, Alves-Pires C, Hanafi H, et al. ITS 2 sequences heterogeneity in Phlebotomus sergenti and Phlebotomus similis (Diptera, Psychodidae): possible consequences in their ability to transmit Leishmania tropica. Int J Parasitol. 2002;32:1123–31.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  42. 42.

    Dvorak V, Votypka J, Aytekin A, Alten B, Volf P. Intraspecific variability of natural populations of Phlebotomus sergenti, the main vector of Leishmania tropica. J Vector Ecol. 2011;36(Suppl. 1):49–57.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  43. 43.

    Bounamous A, Lehrter V, Hadj-Henni L, Delecolle J-C, Depaquit J. Limits of a rapid identification of common Mediterranean sandflies using polymerase chain reaction-restriction fragment length polymorphism. Mem Inst Oswaldo Cruz. 2014;109:466–72.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  44. 44.

    Depaquit J, Léger N, Ferté H. The taxonomic status of Phlebotomus sergenti Parrot, 1917, vector of Leishmania tropica (Wright, 1903) and Phlebotomus similis Perfiliev, 1963 (Diptera-Psychodidae). Morphologic and morphometric approaches. Biogeographical and epidemiological corollaries. Bull Soc Pathol Exot. 1998;91:346–52.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  45. 45.

    Ozbel Y, Karakus M, Arserim SK, Kalkan SO, Toz S. Molecular detection and identification of Leishmania spp in naturally infected Phlebotomus tobbi and Sergentomyia dentata in a focus of human and canine leishmaniasis in western Turkey. Acta Trop. 2016;155:89–94.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  46. 46.

    Léger N, Depaquit J, Ferté H, Rioux J, Gantier J, Gramiccia M, et al. Phlebotomine sandflies (Diptera: Psychodidae) of the isle of Cyprus. II. Isolation and typing of Leishmania (Leishmania infantum Nicolle, 1908 (zymodeme MON 1) from Phlebotomus (Larroussius) tobbi Adler and Theodor, 1930. Parasite. 2000;7:143–6.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  47. 47.

    Velo E, Paparisto A, Bongiorno G, Di Muccio T, Khoury C, Bino S, et al. Entomological and parasitological study on phlebotomine sandflies in central and northern Albania. Parasite. 2005;12:45–9.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  48. 48.

    Rassi Y, Dehkordi AS, Oshaghi MA, Abai MR, Mohtarami F, Enayati A, et al. First report on natural infection of the Phlebotomus tobbi by Leishmania infantum in northwestern Iran. Exp Parasitol. 2012;131:344–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  49. 49.

    Ozbel Y, Balcioglu IC, Olgen MK, Simsek FM, Toz SO, Ertabaklar H, et al. Spatial distribution of phlebotomine sand flies in the Aydin Mountains and surroundings: the main focus of cutaneous leishmaniasis in western Turkey. J Vector Ecol. 2011;36(Suppl 1):99–105.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  50. 50.

    Badakhshan M, Sadraei J, Moin-Vaziri V. Morphometric and morphological variation between two different populations of Phlebotomus major s.l. from endemic and non-endemic foci of visceral leishmaniasis in Iran. J Vector Ecol. 2011;36:153–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  51. 51.

    Yang Z, Landry J-F, Hebert PD. A DNA barcode library for North American Pyraustinae (Lepidoptera: Pyraloidea: Crambidae). PLoS ONE. 2016;11:e0161449.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  52. 52.

    Léger N, Gramiccia M, Gradoni L, Madulo-Leblond G, Pesson B, Ferte H, et al. Isolation and typing of Leishmania infantum from Phlebotomus neglectus on the island of Corfu, Greece. Trans R Soc Trop Med Hyg. 1988;82:419–20.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  53. 53.

    Amro A, Azmi K, Schönian G, Nasereddin A, Alsharabati MB, Sawalha S, et al. Epidemiology of pediatric visceral leishmaniasis in Hebron district, Palestine. Trans R Soc Trop Med Hyg. 2009;103:731–6.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  54. 54.

    Ergunay K, Erisoz Kasap O, Kocak Tufan Z, Turan MH, Ozkul A, Alten B. Molecular evidence indicates that Phlebotomus major sensu lato (Diptera: Psychodidae) is the vector species of the recently-identified sandfly fever Sicilian virus variant: sandfly fever turkey virus. Vector Borne Zoonotic Dis. 2012;12:690–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  55. 55.

    Giorgobiani E, Lawyer PG, Babuadze G, Dolidze N, Jochim RC, Tskhvaradze L, et al. Incrimination of Phlebotomus kandelakii and Phlebotomus balcanicus as vectors of Leishmania infantum in Tbilisi, Georgia. PLoS Negl Trop Dis. 2012;6:e1609.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  56. 56.

    Strelkova MV, Ponirovsky EN, Morozov EN, Zhirenkina EN, Razakov SA, Kovalenko DA, et al. A narrative review of visceral leishmaniasis in Armenia, Azerbaijan, Georgia, Kazakhstan, Kyrgyzstan, Tajikistan, Turkmenistan, Uzbekistan, the Crimean Peninsula and Southern Russia. Parasit Vectors. 2015;8:330.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  57. 57.

    Seccombe A, Ready P, Huddleston L. A catalogue of Old World phlebotomine sandflies (Diptera: Psychodidae, Phlebotominae). Occasional papers on systematic entomology, number 8. London: The Natural History Museum; 1993. p. 1–60.

  58. 58.

    Yaman M, Dik B. An inventory of the phlebotomine sandflies (Diptera: Psychodidae) found in the Turkish province of Konya. Ann Trop Med Parasitol. 2006;100:265–75.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  59. 59.

    Theodor O, Mesghali A. On the phlebotominae of Iran. J Med Entomol. 1964;1:285–300.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  60. 60.

    Aransay AM, Scoulica E, Tselentis Y. Detection and identification of Leishmania DNA within naturally infected sand flies by semi-nested PCR on minicircle kinetoplastic DNA. Appl Environ Microbiol. 2000;66:1933–8.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  61. 61.

    Sadlova J, Hajmova M, Volf P. Phlebotomus (Adlerius) halepensis vector competence for Leishmania major and Le tropica. Med Vet Entomol. 2003;17:244–50.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  62. 62.

    Ivović V, Patakakis M, Tselentis Y, Chaniotis B. Faunistic study of sandflies in Greece. Med Vet Entomol. 2007;21:121–4.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  63. 63.

    Prudhomme J, Rahola N, Toty C, Cassan C, Roiz D, Vergnes B, et al. Ecology and spatiotemporal dynamics of sandflies in the Mediterranean Languedoc region (Roquedur area, Gard, France). Parasit Vectors. 2015;8:642.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  64. 64.

    Farkas R, Tánczos B, Bongiorno G, Maroli M, Dereure J, Ready PD. First surveys to investigate the presence of canine leishmaniasis and its phlebotomine vectors in Hungary. Vector Borne Zoonotic Dis. 2011;11:823–34.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  65. 65.

    Naucke TJ, Lorentz S, Rauchenwald F, Aspöck H. Phlebotomus (Transphlebotomus) mascittii Grassi, 1908, in Carinthia: first record of the occurrence of sandflies in Austria (Diptera: Psychodidae: Phlebotominae). Parasitol Res. 2011;109:1161–4.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  66. 66.

    Melaun C, Krüger A, Werblow A, Klimpel S. New record of the suspected leishmaniasis vector Phlebotomus (Transphlebotomus) mascittii Grassi, 1908 (Diptera: Psychodidae: Phlebotominae)—the northernmost phlebotomine sandfly occurrence in the Palearctic region. Parasitol Res. 2014;113:2295–301.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  67. 67.

    Dvorak V, Hlavackova K, Kocisova A, Volf P. First record of Phlebotomus (Transphlebotomus) mascittii in Slovakia. Parasite. 2016;23:48.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  68. 68.

    Vaselek S, Ayhan N, Oguz G, Kasap OE, Savić S, di Muccio T, et al. Sand fly and Leishmania spp. survey in Vojvodina (Serbia): first detection of Leishmania infantum DNA in sand flies and the first record of Phlebotomus (Transphlebotomus) mascittii Grassi, 1908. Parasit Vectors. 2017;10:444.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  69. 69.

    Praprotnik E, Zupan S, Ivović V. Morphological and molecular identification of Phlebotomus mascittii Grassi, 1908 populations from Slovenia. J Med Entomol. 2018;56:565–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  70. 70.

    Saliba E, Saleh N, Oumeish O, Khoury S, Bisharat Z, Al-Ouran R. The endemicity of Leishmania tropica (zymodeme MON-137) in the Eira-Yarqa area of Salt District, Jordan. Ann Trop Med Parasit. 1997;91:453–9.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  71. 71.

    Haddad N, Léger N, Sadek R. Sandflies of Lebanon: faunistic inventory. Parasite. 2003;10:99–110.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  72. 72.

    Sawalha SS, Shtayeh MS, Khanfar HM, Warburg A, Abdeen ZA. Phlebotomine sand flies (Diptera: Psychodidae) of the Palestinian West Bank: potential vectors of leishmaniasis. J Med Entomol. 2003;40:321–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  73. 73.

    Léger N, Depaquit J, Ferté H. Les phlébotomes (Diptera-Psychodidae) de l’île de Chypre. I-Description de Phlebotomus (Transphlebotomus) economidesi n sp. Parasite. 2000;7:135–41.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  74. 74.

    Sadlova J, Dvorak V, Seblova V, Warburg A, Votypka J, Volf P. Sergentomyia schwetzi is not a competent vector for Leishmania donovani and other Leishmania species pathogenic to humans. Parasit Vectors. 2013;6:186.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  75. 75.

    Killick-Kendrick R. Phlebotomine vectors of the leishmaniases: a review. Med Vet Entomol. 1990;4:1–24.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  76. 76.

    Depaquit J, Hadj-Henni L, Bounamous A, Strutz S, Boussaa S, Morillas-Marquez F, et al. Mitochondrial DNA intraspecific variability in Sergentomyia minuta (Diptera: Psychodidae). J Med Entomol. 2015;52:819–28.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

Download references


We would like to thank Dr. Filiz Gunay, Gizem Oguz, Gokhan Ergan and A. Serkan Kasap for their invaluable assistance during the field collections.


This study was funded by The Scientific and Technological Research Council of Turkey (SBAG: 114S999) and the Armed Forces Health Surveillance Board, Global Emerging Infections Surveillance and Response System (AFHSB-GEIS), USA; FY18 Award P0034_18_WR (PI: Y-ML) under US Army subcontract W911QY-16-C-0160 to Hacettepe University). The research was supported by Hacettepe University Scientific Research Unit (01001601001). The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript. The material to be published reflects the views of the authors and should not be construed to represent those of the US Department of the Army or the US Department of Defense.

Author information




Study design: OEK, YML, YO and BA. Fieldwork: OEK, YML, BA, MK and YO. Morphological identification, DNA barcoding and data analysis: OEK. Manuscript preparation: OEK and YML. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Ozge Erisoz Kasap.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate

Local or regional ethics committee approval was not required for the adult sand fly collections.

Consent for publication

All authors submit their full consent for publication.

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Additional files

Additional file 1: Table S1.

Information regarding the sand fly collection sites and the number of traps used in each locality.

Additional file 2: Figure S1.

Neighbor Joining (NJ) tree using the 741 cox1 sequences obtained for Turkish sand fly specimens. The bootstrap values higher than 50% are indicated.

Additional file 3: Figure S2.

Haplotype network obtained for the 56 P. papatasi specimens analyzed from Turkey. Haplotypes are sized according to their relative frequencies and colored by their geographical origin. Missing haplotypes are denoted by small black circles and the numbers of mutational steps are represented by the dashes.

Additional file 4: Figure S3.

Haplotype networks obtained for the 83 Paraphlebotomus specimens analyzed from Turkey (a P. alexandri, b P. sergenti (s.l.), c P. caucasicus, P. jacusieli and Paraphlebotomus sp.). Haplotypes are sized according to their relative frequencies and colored by their geographical origin. Missing haplotypes are denoted by small black circles and the numbers of mutational steps are represented by the dashes.

Additional file 5: Table S2.

Interspecific and intraspecific (diagonal line) cox1 sequence divergence based on K2P model obtained for Turkish sand flies.

Additional file 6: Figure S4.

Haplotype network obtained for the 107 P. tobbi specimens analyzed from Turkey. Haplotypes are sized according to their relative frequencies and colored by their geographical origin. Missing haplotypes are denoted by small black circles and the numbers of mutational steps are represented by the dashes.

Additional file 7: Figure S5.

Haplotype network obtained for the 96 P. perfiliewi (s.l.) specimens analyzed from Turkey. Haplotypes are sized according to their relative frequencies and colored by their geographical origin. Missing haplotypes are denoted by small black circles and the numbers of mutational steps are represented by the dashes.

Additional file 8: Figure S6.

Haplotype network obtained for the 169 P. major (s.l.) specimens analyzed from Turkey. Haplotypes are sized according to their relative frequencies and colored by their geographical origin. Missing haplotypes are denoted by small black circles and the numbers of mutational steps are represented by the dashes.

Additional file 9: Figure S7.

Haplotype network obtained for the 52 P. kandelakii (s.l.) specimens analyzed from Turkey. Haplotypes are sized according to their relative frequencies and colored by their geographical origin. Missing haplotypes are denoted by small black circles and the numbers of mutational steps are represented by the dashes.

Additional file 10: Figure S8.

Haplotype networks obtained for the 101 Adlerius specimens analyzed from Turkey (a P. simici; b P. brevis and Adlerius sp.; c P. balcanicus, P. halepensis and P. kyreniae). Haplotypes are sized according to their relative frequencies and colored by their geographical origin. Missing haplotypes are denoted by small black circles and the numbers of mutational steps are represented by the dashes.

Additional file 11: Figure S9.

Haplotype networks obtained for the 16 Transphlebotomus specimens analyzed from Turkey. Haplotypes are sized according to their relative frequencies and colored by their geographical origin. Missing haplotypes are denoted by small black circles and the numbers of mutational steps are represented by the dashes.

Additional file 12: Figure S10.

Haplotype networks obtained for the 62 Sergentomyia specimens analyzed from Turkey (a S. dentata; b S. minuta). Haplotypes are sized according to their relative frequencies and colored by their geographical origin. Missing haplotypes are denoted by small black circles and the numbers of mutational steps are represented by the dashes.

Additional file 13: Figure S11.

The distribution of the MOTUs observed in the three biogeographical regions of Turkey. Different colors represent the different sand fly species delineated by all three methods (ABGD, ML and TCS).

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver ( applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Erisoz Kasap, O., Linton, YM., Karakus, M. et al. Revision of the species composition and distribution of Turkish sand flies using DNA barcodes. Parasites Vectors 12, 410 (2019).

Download citation


  • Phlebotomine
  • Sand fly
  • Turkey
  • cox1
  • Barcoding
  • Diversity