Skip to main content

Advertisement

Genetic variation in Austrostrongylus thylogale Johnston & Mawson, 1940 (Nematoda: Trichostrongylida) from the tammar wallaby, Notamacropus eugenii (Gray), and the quokka, Setonix brachyurus (Quoy & Gaimard) (Marsupialia: Macropodidae) in Australia

Abstract

Background

Australian marsupials harbour a diverse array of helminth parasites. Despite current attempts to assess the extent of this diversity in macropodid hosts, it has been suggested that unique parasite fauna of Australian wildlife is difficult to document comprehensively due to the common occurrence of cryptic species. This paper assessed genetic variation within Austrostrongylus thylogale Johnston & Mawson, 1940 from the tammar wallaby, Notamacropus eugenii (Gray), and the quokka, Setonix brachyurus (Quoy & Gaimard), from different localities using the molecular characterisation of the internal transcribed spacers (ITS) within the nuclear ribosomal DNA.

Methods

Thirty-seven specimens of A. thylogale collected from N. eugenii (from Parndana, Kangaroo Island, South Australia, and Perup, Western Australia) and S. brachyurus (from Wellington Dam, Western Australia) were characterised using a molecular-phylogenetic approach utilising the first (ITS1) and second (ITS2) internal transcribed spacers.

Results

Genetic variation was detected in both ITS1 and ITS2 between specimens of A. thylogale from N. eugenii and S. brachyurus; however, no variation was detected between specimens collected from N. eugenii from Parndana, South Australia, and Perup, Western Australia. Furthermore, the phylogenetic analyses of ITS sequences showed two clades of A. thylogale originating from two hosts, N. eugenii and S. brachyurus, suggesting the presence of cryptic species.

Conclusions

This study provides evidence of genetic variation within A. thylogale based on collections from two different host species. Morphological studies are required to fully confirm the presence of a new species or cryptic species. Further molecular studies using a larger number of specimens are warranted to explore the genetic variation between A. thylogale from different geographical localities.

Background

The Australian continent is biologically diverse, and native animals such as kangaroos and wallabies (family Macropodidae) harbour a diverse range of unique nematodes [1]. The abundance and extensive range of parasites has been attributed to the host-specific nature of the helminths found in macropodids and their herbivorous grazing habits [2, 3]. Given the large numbers of nematodes, host specificity, and variable size and morphology of worms, uncommon species may often be overlooked [3,4,5].

While macropodid nematodes are diverse, they are well known for having simple body plans and morphological uniformity, which can make it difficult to distinguish between species based on morphology alone [6]. As a result, molecular methods such as DNA-based techniques have been developed to enable the definition and identification of genetic markers for the characterisation of various species [7]. A commonly used genetic method in the identification of such nematodes is the sequencing of the first and second internal transcribed spacers (ITS1 and ITS2, respectively) of the nuclear ribosomal DNA, which are known to be reliable genetic markers due to the homology of these sequences between species [7, 8]. This molecular technique has been used in many studies to distinguish between morphologically similar species as well as cryptic (i.e. genetically distinct but morphologically similar) species [7, 9, 10].

The trichostrongylid genus Austrostrongylus Chandler, 1924 contains 13 recognised species, which occur in the duodenum of various macropodid hosts with an aberrant species in the marsupial mole (Notoryctes typhlops (Stirling)) [11,12,13]. Austrostrongylus thylogale Johnston & Mawson, 1940, was first described from tammar wallabies (Notamacropus eugenii (Gray)) on Kangaroo Island, South Australia [14] and was subsequently reported from quokkas (Setonix brachyurus (Quoy & Gaimard)) on Rottnest Island, Western Australia by Inglis [15]. Notamacropus eugenii occurs on Kangaroo Island, South Australia and, in a highly disjunct distribution, in the south-west of Western Australia including islands such as Garden Island. The population of S. brachyurus is distributed in the south-west of Western Australia, as well as on two offshore islands, Rottnest Island and Bald Island [16]. The distribution of N. eugenii is therefore sympatric with S. brachyurus in the south-west of Western Australia. A recent study analysing the ITS sequences of mainland and island populations of the strongylid nematode Labiosimplex australis Kung, 1948 suggested that genetic variation within this species was possibly due to geographical isolation on islands or between geographically distant locations [17]. Therefore, we hypothesised that similar genetic differences might also be present in populations of A. thylogale as it has a disjunct geographical distribution and occurs in different host species [6]. This paper aimed to assess the genetic variation in A. thylogale collected from different localities and host species by characterising the ITS region of the nematode.

Methods

Collection of specimens

Adult specimens of A. thylogale (n = 37) were sourced from the frozen parasite collection at the School of Veterinary Science, The University of Melbourne. These specimens had been collected opportunistically from culled or road-killed hosts from various localities in Australia (Table 1). The nematodes were frozen in liquid nitrogen and stored at − 80 °C until use. Upon thawing, the anterior and posterior ends were excised, placed in lactophenol and stored for later morphological analysis. Mid-sections were used for genomic DNA extraction. Morphological vouchers for the specimens sequenced were deposited in the South Australian Museum, Adelaide: from N. eugenii, Perup River, Western Australia (24J5.4) AHC 48324; Parndana, Kangaroo Island, South Australia (18B2.2, 2.9, 2.11, 2.18, 2.19) AHC 48326; from S. brachyurus, Wellington Dam, Western Australia (24H5.2, 5.5, 5.6, 5.8) AHC 48325.

Table 1 Austrostrongylus thylogale samples used for molecular analysis with descriptions of host species, Notamacropus eugenii and Setonix brachyurus, localities in South Australia (SA) and Western Australia (WA) and GenBank accession numbers

Molecular characterisation

Total genomic DNA (gDNA) was isolated from individual worms using the Wizard SV Genomic DNA Purification kit (Promega, Madison, WI, USA). Both the first (ITS1) and second (ITS2) sequences were amplified by one PCR reaction using primers NC16 (5′-AGT TCA ATC GCA ATG GCT T-3′) and NC2 (5′-TTA GTT TCT TTT CCT CCG CT-3′) [7]. PCRs were conducted in 50 μl volumes containing 2 µl of DNA template, 10 mM Tris-HCl (pH 8.4), 50 mM KCl (Promega), 3.5 mM MgCl2, 250 μM of each deoxynucleotide triphosphate (dNTP), 100 pmol of each primer, and 1 U of GoTaq polymerase (Promega). The PCR conditions used were: 5 min at 94 °C, then 35 cycles of 30 s at 94 °C, 20 s at 55 °C, and 20 s at 72 °C, followed by 5 min at 72 °C. Negative (no DNA template) and positive controls (Trichostrongylus colubriformis (Giles, 1892) gDNA) were included in the PCR analyses. An aliquot (5 μl) of each amplicon was subjected to agarose gel (1.5%) electrophoresis to visualise PCR amplicons.

Amplicons were purified using shrimp alkaline phosphate and exonuclease I [18] prior to automated Sanger DNA sequencing at Macrogen Incorporation, South Korea, using the same primers used in the PCR.

Sequence and phylogenetic analyses

The quality of each forward and reverse sequence was assessed, and each consensus sequence assembled using Geneious Prime 2019.0.4 (www.geneious.com). Polymorphic sites were designated using the International Union of Pure and Applied Chemistry codes. All nucleotide sequences obtained were deposited in the GenBank (Table 1). Nucleotide sequences were aligned using MUSCLE v.3.8.31 [19] within MEGA-X using default settings [20]. Pairwise comparisons of aligned sequences were performed to calculate nucleotide differences using BioEdit [21].

Unique ITS1, ITS2 and concatenated ITS (designated as ITS+) sequences collected in this study were aligned with respective reference sequences using MUSCLE in MEGA using default settings and were trimmed to uniform lengths of 356 bp (ITS1), 240 bp (ITS2) and 596 (ITS+) bp. The evolutionary models for each DNA sequence dataset [ITS1 and ITS+: Hasegawa-Kishino-Yano (HKY); ITS2 Tamura-Nei (TrN)] were determined using the Akaike and the Bayesian information criteria (AIC and BIC) tests in jModelTest v.3.7 [22]. Neighbour-joining (NJ) trees were constructed using MEGA, and Bayesian Inference (BI) trees were built using MrBayes [23]. The NJ trees were constructed with 10,000 bootstrap replicates using the Tamura-Nei distance method. Each BI analysis was run for 20,000,000 generations to calculate posterior probabilities (pp), with two runs, with every 200th tree saved. Sequences from Austrostrongylus victoriensis Cassone, 1983 were included as the outgroup. Tree topology was checked for consensus between NJ and BI analyses using the software Figtree v1.4.4 (http://tree.bio.ed.ac.uk/software/figtree/).

Results and discussion

Following the PCR amplification of the ITS region, 14 amplicons were selected for DNA sequencing. Six and five unique sequences of ITS1 (length: 399 bp) and ITS2 (length: 240 bp) were identified, respectively. The G+C content of ITS1 sequences of A. thylogale was higher in specimens collected from S. brachyurus (42.6%) than those obtained from N. eugenii (41.5–41.6%), with no difference based on location. However, the G+C content of ITS2 sequences was higher in specimens of A. thylogale collected from N. eugenii (Parndana: 43.8–45.0%; Perup: 44.2%) than those collected from S. brachyurus (44.6%).

The ITS1 sequences of A. thylogale from the Parndana population of N. eugenii had fewer nucleotide polymorphisms [two nucleotide positions: 353 (W) and 397 (R)] than those from S. brachyurus [four nucleotide positions: 144 (S) 208 (K), 244 (M) and 274 (R)]. Furthermore, the nucleotide variability between A. thylogale from N. eugenii and S. brachyurus was linked to three transitions (T ↔ C or A ↔ G) (Table 2; see Additional file 1: Figure S1). Based on within-host species pairwise comparisons, higher nucleotide variation was observed in specimens of A. thylogale collected from S. brachyurus (0.3–2.3%) than those collected from N. eugenii (0.3–1.8%).

Table 2 Nucleotide positions showing the variation within the first internal transcribed spacer sequences of A. thylogale from two hosts

Nucleotide differences of 0.5–1.7% from pairwise comparisons of the ITS2 sequences of A. thylogale from the Parndana population of N. eugenii, were mainly attributed to nucleotide polymorphisms (two nucleotide positions: 2 (Y) and 148 (R)), two transitions (T ↔ C) and two transversions (T ↔ A or A ↔ C) (Table 3; see Additional file 1: Figure S1), whereas sequences from S. brachyurus were identical. The nucleotide variability between specimens of A. thylogale from N. eugenii and S. brachyurus was linked to one transition (T ↔ C) (Table 3; see Additional file 1: Figure S1).

Table 3 Nucleotide positions showing the variation within the second internal transcribed spacer sequences of A. thylogale from two hosts

Phylogenetic analyses of separate ITS sequences using NJ and BI methods revealed that the topology of both trees generated (separately) for each dataset (ITS1, ITS2 and ITS+ sequences) were similar using BI and NJ (data not shown); hence, only the NJ tree of the ITS+ sequences is presented here (Fig. 1). The ITS sequences of A. thylogale from N. eugenii originating from Parndana (South Australia) and Perup (Western Australia) grouped together with strong statistical support (posterior probability of BI = 1.00, bootstrap value of NJ = 87%) whereas those from S. brachyurus formed the separate clade, also with strong statistical support (1.00, 86%) (Fig. 1).

Fig. 1
figure1

Phylogenetic analysis of the ITS+ rDNA sequences of Austrostrongylus thylogale from quokkas and tammar wallabies from different geographical locations. The sequence data were analysed using the Bayesian Inference (BI) and Neighbour-Joining (NJ) methods. Nodal support is given as a posterior probability and bootstrap value for BI and NJ, respectively. Unique sequences are presented with the voucher number, host and locality. Austrostrongylus victoriensis (JX877697) was used as the outgroup. The scale-bar indicates the number of inferred substitutions per nucleotide site. Abbreviations: SA, South Australia, WA, Western Australia

To our knowledge, this is the first report of the genetic characterisation of the ITS+ DNA of A. thylogale and findings of this study support our hypothesis that specimens of A. thylogale collected from two different hosts i.e. N. eugenii and S. brachyurus are genetically distinct, suggesting the existence of cryptic species. Similar findings have been reported for a number of other macropodid nematodes [17, 24,25,26,27,28].

We found little variation in the ITS sequences of A. thylogale specimens collected from N. eugenii from two distant geographical locations (Parndana, South Australia, and Perup, Western Australia); however, there were four (3 in ITS1; 1 in ITS2) fixed nucleotide differences between specimens collected from N. eugenii and S. brachyurus (see Tables 2 and 3). Furthermore, the overall pairwise nucleotide differences and G+C content were also different between the specimens of A. thylogale originating from the two different host species. The ITS loci are known to be reliable genetic markers for the characterisation of strongylid nematodes as both ITS1 and ITS2 sequences can be quite conservative and only one or more fixed differences can assist in assessing interspecific differences [7, 29]. Therefore, the findings of this study suggest that A. thylogale may represent more than one species. However, this hypothesis needs to be tested using the morphological and molecular examination of a large number of specimens. Preliminary morphological examination of specimens from the two host species revealed no obvious differences.

Phylogenetic analysis of the ITS1, ITS2 and ITS+ sequences consistently revealed that A. thylogale from N. eugenii and S. brachyurus formed two separate clades (Fig. 1), and individual sequences from the same host species clustered together, suggesting this grouping is more strongly associated with the host rather than the locality.

Species of Austrostrongylus occur predominantly in the related wallaby genera Notamacropus Dawson & Flannery, Dorcopsis Schlegel & Müller and Wallabia Trouessart [1] although transmission occasionally occurs to other sympatric macropodid hosts although at a lower prevalence and intensity [30]. In this instance, it appears to be a host switch from N. eugenii to S. brachyurus. This hypothesis is supported by the sympatric distribution of N. eugenii and S. brachyurus in Western Australia [16]. Studies have shown that most macropodid nematodes undergo speciation via host-switching due to overlapping host-ranges and feeding habits [25, 26, 31]. In the present example, apart from infecting a new host species, the parasite appears to have undergone a degree of genetic differentiation within the new host.

In this study, the genetic variation in A. thylogale may represent another example of cryptic species as the specimens genetically characterised herein had very similar morphological features [14]. The existence of cryptic species amongst nematodes in macropodid hosts has been detected previously [17, 32, 33]. For example, Chilton et al. [24] reported four sibling species within Cloacina petrogale Johnston & Mawson, 1938 using multilocus enzyme electrophoresis. Subsequently, they used DNA sequence data to demonstrate the existence of cryptic species within four morphospecies of the genus Cloacina that occurred within rock wallabies of the genus Petrogale Gray. More recently, Chilton et al. [26] proposed 10 cryptic species within the phascolostrongyline nematode, Hypodontus macropi Mönnig, 1929 from 12 macropodid hosts. Although the reasons for the apparent common occurrence of sibling species in cloacinine and phascolostrongyline nematodes are not clear, the relatively rapid radiation of the hosts [34], as well as the opportunities for host switching, may contribute to this phenomenon [35]. However, the confirmation of these inferences requires further studies with larger sample size.

Conclusions

A molecular-phylogenetic approach using ITS sequences revealed genetic variation in 37 specimens of A. thylogale from N. eugenii and S. brachyurus from different locations. Phylogenetic analyses of the sequence data revealed distinct clades based on hosts. Additional morphological and molecular studies are required to fully confirm the presence of a new species or cryptic species of Austrostrongylus.

Availability of data and materials

All data generated or analysed during this study are included in this published article. DNA sequence data generated during this study are available from the GenBank under the accession numbers MT022443-MT022454.

Abbreviations

ITS1:

first internal transcribed spacer

ITS2:

second internal transcribed spacer

PCR:

polymerase chain reaction

BI:

Bayesian Inference

NJ:

neighbour-joining

IUPAC:

International Union of Pure and Applied Chemistry

References

  1. 1.

    Spratt DM, Beveridge I. Helminth parasites of Australasian monotremes and marsupials. Zootaxa. 2016;4123:1–198.

  2. 2.

    Beveridge I, Spratt DM. Biodiversity and parasites of wildlife: helminths of Australasian marsupials. Trends Parasitol. 2015;31:142–8.

  3. 3.

    Beveridge I, Chilton NB. Co-evolutionary relationships between the nematode subfamily Cloacininae and its macropodid marsupial hosts. Int J Parasitol. 2001;31:976–96.

  4. 4.

    Vendl C, Beveridge I. Estimations of species richness in the complex communities of nematode parasites found in the stomachs of kangaroos and wallabies (Family Macropodidae). Trans R Soc S Aust. 2014;138:105–12.

  5. 5.

    Bickford D, Lohman DJ, Sodhi NS, Ng PKL, Meier M, Winker K, et al. Cryptic species as a window on diversity and conservation. Trends Ecol Evol. 2007;22:148–55.

  6. 6.

    Beveridge I, Gasser RB. Diversity in parasitic helminths of Australasian marsupials and monotremes: a molecular perspective. Int J Parasitol. 2014;44:859–64.

  7. 7.

    Chilton NB. The use of nuclear ribosomal DNA markers for the identification of bursate nematodes (order Strongylida) and for the diagnosis of infections. Anim Health Res Rev. 2004;5:173–87.

  8. 8.

    Gasser R, Hoste H. Genetic markers for closely-related parasitic nematodes. Mol Cell Probes. 1995;9:315–9.

  9. 9.

    Chilton NB, Gasser RB, Beveridge I. Differences in a ribosomal DNA sequence of morphologically indistinguishable species within the Hypodontus macropi complex (Nematoda: Strongyloidea). Int J Parasitol. 1995;25:647–51.

  10. 10.

    Gasser RB, Bott NJ, Chilton NB, Hunt P, Beveridge I. Toward practical, DNA-based diagnostic methods for parasitic nematodes of livestock - bionomic and biotechnological implications. Biotech Adv. 2008;26:325–34.

  11. 11.

    Beveridge I, Durette-Desset M-C. New species of Austrostrongylus Chandler, 1924 (Nematoda, Trichostrongyloidea), from Australian marsupials, with a redescription of A. minutus Johnston & Mawson, 1938, and description of a new genus, Sutarostrongylus. Bull Mus Natn Hist Nat Paris. 1986;8:145–70.

  12. 12.

    Durette-Desset M-C, Beveridge I. Redescriptions and descriptions of new species of Austrostrongylus Chandler, 1924 (Nematoda: Trichostrongylina), from Australian marsupials with a comparative study of features of the synlophe. Zootaxa. 2012;3512:1–41.

  13. 13.

    Beveridge I, Durette-Desset M-C. Austrostrongylus papuensis n. sp. (Nematoda: Trichostrongylina) from the scrub wallaby, Dorcopsis hageni Heller (Marsupialia: Macropodidae), from Papua New Guinea. Trans R Soc S Aust. 2015;139:306–12.

  14. 14.

    Johnston TH, Mawson PM. Nematodes from South Australian marsupials. Trans R Soc S Aust. 1940;64:95–100.

  15. 15.

    Inglis WG. The geographical and evolutionary relationships of Australian trichostrongyloid parasites and their hosts. J Linn Soc. 1968;47:327–47.

  16. 16.

    Van Dyck S, Strahan R. The mammals of Australia. 3rd ed. Sydney: Reed New Holland; 2008.

  17. 17.

    Chilton NB, Huby-Chilton F, Smales LR, Gasser RB, Beveridge I. Genetic divergence between island and continental populations of the parasitic nematode Labiosimplex australis in Australia. Parasitol Res. 2009;104:229–36.

  18. 18.

    Werle E, Schneider C, Renner M, Volker M, Fiehn W. Convenient single step, one tube purification of PCR products for direct sequencing. Nucleic Acids Res. 1994;22:4354–5.

  19. 19.

    Edgar RC. MUSCLE: multiple sequence alignment with high accuracy and high throughput. Nucleic Acids Res. 2004;32:1792–7.

  20. 20.

    Kumar S, Stecher G, Li M, Knyaz C, Tamura K. MEGA X: molecular evolutionary genetics analysis across computing platforms. Mol Biol Evol. 2018;35:1547–9.

  21. 21.

    Hall TA. BioEdit: a user-friendly biological sequence alignment editor and analysis program for Windows 95/98/NT. Nucleic Acids Symp Ser. 1999;41:95–8.

  22. 22.

    Darriba D, Taboada GL, Doallo R, Posada D. JModelTest 2: more models, new heuristics and parallel computing. Nat Methods. 2012;9:772.

  23. 23.

    Ronquist F, Huelsenbeck JP. MrBayes 3: Bayesian phylogenetic inference under mixed models. Bioinformatics. 2003;19:1572–4.

  24. 24.

    Chilton NB, Beveridge I, Andrews RH. An electrophoretic analysis of patterns of speciation in Cloacina clarkae, C. communis, C. petrogale and C. similis (Nematoda: Strongyloidea) from macropodid marsupials. Int J Parasitol. 1997;27:483–93.

  25. 25.

    Chilton NB, Huby-Chilton F, Beveridge I, Smales LR, Gasser RB, Andrews RH. Phylogenetic relationships of species within the tribe Labiostrongylinea (Nematoda: Cloacinidae) from Australian marsupials based on ribosomal DNA spacer sequence data. Parasitol Int. 2011;60:381–7.

  26. 26.

    Chilton NB, Jabbar A, Huby-Chilton F, Jex A, Gasser RB, Beveridge I. Genetic variation within the Hypodontus macropi (Nematoda: Strongyloidea) complex from macropodid marsupial hosts in Australia. Electrophoresis. 2012;33:3544–54.

  27. 27.

    Chilton NB, Huby-Chilton F, Johnson PM, Beveridge I, Gasser RB. Genetic variation within species of the nematode genus Cloacina (Strongyloidea: Cloacininae) parasitic in the stomachs of rock wallabies, Petrogale spp. (Marsupialia: Macropodidae) in Queensland. Aust J Zool. 2009;57:1–10.

  28. 28.

    Huby-Chilton F, Beveridge I, Gasser RB, Chilton NB. Redescription of Zoniolaimus mawsonae Beveridge, 1983 (Nematoda: Strongyloidea) and the description of Z. latebrosus n. sp. from the red kangaroo Macropus rufus (Marsupialia: Macropodidae) based on morphological and molecular data. Syst Parasitol. 2002;51:135–47.

  29. 29.

    Stevenson LA, Chilton NB, Gasser RB. Differentiation of Haemonchus placei from H. contortus (Nematoda: Trichostrongylidae) by the ribosomal DNA second internal transcribed spacer. Int J Parasitol. 1995;25:483–8.

  30. 30.

    Aussavy M, Bernadin E, Corrigan A, Hufschmid J, Beveridge I. Helminth parasite communities in four species of sympatric macropodids in western Victoria. Aust Mammal. 2011;33:13–20.

  31. 31.

    Chilton NB, Shuttleworth MA, Huby-Chilton F, Koehler AV, Jabbar A, Gasser RB, Beveridge I. Speciation in the genus Cloacina (Nematoda: Strongylida); species flocks and intra-host speciation. Parasitology. 2017;144:1828–40.

  32. 32.

    Beveridge I, Chilton NB, Andrews RH. Sibling species within Macropostrongyloides baylisi (Nematoda: Strongyloidea) from macropodid marsupials. Int J Parasitol. 1993;23:21–33.

  33. 33.

    Chilton NB, Gasser RB, Beveridge I. Phylogenetic relationships of Australian strongyloid nematodes inferred from ribosomal DNA sequence data. Int J Parasitol. 1997;27:1481–94.

  34. 34.

    Meredith RW, Westerman M, Springer MS. A phylogeny and timescale for the living genera of kangaroos and kin (Macropodiformes: Marsupialia) based on nuclear DNA sequences. Aust J Zool. 2008;56:395–410.

  35. 35.

    Beveridge I, Spratt DM. The helminth fauna of Australasian marsupials: origins and evolutionary biology. Adv Parasitol. 1996;37:135–254.

Download references

Acknowledgements

We wish to thank Lee Webley for collecting material on Kangaroo Island, South Australia and Rob Brazelle, of the former Department of Conservation and Land Management, Collie, Western Australia for providing the material from that state.

Funding

Funding was provided by the Australian Biological Resources Study grant numbers RF217-06 and CBG18-07. TS is a grateful recipient of the Australian Government Research Training Scholarship through the University of Melbourne.

Author information

BI and AJ conceived the idea and designed the study. TS and TH conducted laboratory work. TS, TH and AJ carried out data analyses. TH, TS, IB and AJ drafted the manuscript. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Correspondence to Abdul Jabbar.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate

All applicable institutional and national guidelines for the use of animals were followed.

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary information

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Sukee, T., Huynh, T., Beveridge, I. et al. Genetic variation in Austrostrongylus thylogale Johnston & Mawson, 1940 (Nematoda: Trichostrongylida) from the tammar wallaby, Notamacropus eugenii (Gray), and the quokka, Setonix brachyurus (Quoy & Gaimard) (Marsupialia: Macropodidae) in Australia. Parasites Vectors 13, 135 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1186/s13071-020-4007-5

Download citation

Keywords

  • Austrostrongylus thylogale
  • Tammar wallaby
  • Quokka
  • Internal transcribed spacers
  • Cryptic species

Comments

By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate. Please note that comments may be removed without notice if they are flagged by another user or do not comply with our community guidelines.