Skip to main content

Dirofilaria immitis antigenemia and microfilaremia in Iberian wolves and red foxes from Portugal

Abstract

Background

Dirofilaria immitis is a parasitic nematode endemic in the Mediterranean countries, which causes cardiopulmonary dirofilariosis in wild and domestic animals. Despite being recognized hosts of D. immitis, wild carnivores such as wolves and foxes are frequently disregarded when considering a potential role in the transmission of these zoonotic nematodes. In Portugal, studies available regarding D. immitis circulation are scarce, likely underestimating its relevance. To add knowledge on this, we sought to assess Iberian wolves (Canis lupus signatus) and red foxes (Vulpes vulpes) from northern Portugal for D. immitis antigenemia and microfilaremia.

Methods

Blood samples from 42 Iberian wolves and 19 red foxes were collected, during 2010–2012, in Peneda-Gerês National Park. Antigenemia was searched for by rapid antigen detection test kits (Uranotest Dirofilaria ®). Microfilaremia was assessed by polymerase chain reaction (PCR). Nucleic acids were extracted from blood using QIAamp® DNA Mini Kit (Qiagen), and DNA was screened for the presence of microfilaria using a conventional PCR targeting the 5.8S-internal transcribed spacer 2–28S regions, followed by bidirectional sequencing, Basic Local Alignment Search Tool analysis and phylogenetic analysis.

Results

Three red foxes had antigenemia, with an occurrence of 15.8% (95% confidence interval [CI] 3.4–39.6), while showing no evidence for the presence of microfilaremia. No wolf samples presented evidence for D. immitis antigenemia. Nevertheless, two wolves were positive for D. immitis microfilaremia (4.8%; 95% CI 0.6–16.2%) as revealed by PCR and confirmed by bidirectional sequencing.

Conclusions

Although Dirofilaria microfilaremia in wolves does not necessarily correlate to an endangerment of the infected animal's health, positive individuals can act as a reservoir for further infection if the intermediate mosquito hosts are present. To the best of our knowledge, one single study had reported that wolves were suitable Dirofilaria hosts, but microfilaremia have never been reported.

Graphical Abstract

Background

Dirofilaria immitis (Rhabditida; Onchocercidae) is a parasitic nematode, which causes cardiopulmonary dirofilariasis in wild and domestic canines and felines, and also pulmonary dirofilariasis in humans [1]. Mosquitoes (Diptera; Culicidae) are vectors to Dirofilaria spp., making the parasite distribution susceptible to changes, as well as to rapid and significant variations in defined geographic regions, such as movement of infected animals, the introduction of new mosquito species and anthropogenic activities in ecosystems [2, 3].

Dirofilariosis is endemic in the Mediterranean countries, including Portugal, particularly because of the appropriate geographic and climatic conditions [4]. The climate in Portugal is typically temperate with warm and dry summers. It is considered to be divided in subtypes, namely the first with hot summers and average temperatures > 22 °C in the warmest months and the second with warm summers with average temperatures ≤ 22 °C in the warmest months and with ≥ 4 months with the average temperatures > 10 °C [5].

Wildlife carnivores have long been overlooked when considering their possible role in transmitting zoonotic nematodes [6]. However, increasing human activities have continuously promoted wild environment invasion, ultimately redefining domestic and wild interface boundaries and consequently increasing the contact between humans and wild animals [6]. Moreover, wild animals are frequently exposed to vector-borne pathogens to such an extent that wild carnivores like the gray wolf (Canis lupus), red fox (Vulpes vulpes) and golden jackal (Canis aureus) are now recognized hosts of D. immitis [7].

Wolves and foxes’ role as D. immitis reservoir hosts and their contribution to disease transmission are acknowledged throughout Europe [8]. However, in Portugal, little information is known regarding D. immitis circulation, and the studies available are limited to a few surveys and case reports, possibly underestimating the relevance of these nematodes [3]. Moreover, the extent to which wild carnivores remain reservoirs for D. immitis is still unknown. As such, the aim of the present investigation was to assess the presence of D. immitis in wolves and foxes in Portugal by searching for both D. immitis antigens, using a rapid immunomigration test (RIM), and for D. immitis microfilaremia, by using a species-specific polymerase chain reaction (PCR) assay optimized for the simultaneous detection and differentiation of D. immitis and eight other concurrent filarioids.

Methods

Blood samples were collected from a total of 61 wild carnivores, 42 wolves (C. lupus signatus) and 19 foxes (V. vulpes), during 2010–2012, from a National Park located at the northern border of Portugal (Peneda-Gerês National Park). Samples from these animals were collected as part of a carnivore protection program, an initiative that manages the collection of recently deceased animals suspected to be poisoned. Tissues and other matrices are available for studies considered to be of value for the assessment of animal population morbidities and mortalities.

For the initial detection of D. immitis infection, rapid antigen detection test kits (Uranotest Dirofilaria ®, Barcelona, Spain) were used, according to the manufacturer’s instructions. This test consists of an immunochromatographic technique aiming at the qualitative detection of the D. immitis antigen in blood, which resources to 14 kDa antigen detection not related to the parasite’s feminine genital apparatus, hence detecting both male and female parasites. The platform detects infections with a load of only one adult parasite of any type (males, adult females, immature females), with sensitivity and specificity of 94% and 100%, respectively, compared to necropsy, according to the manufacturer’s information.

To detect microfilaremia, DNA was extracted from blood using the QIAamp® DNA Mini Kit (Qiagen, Valencia, CA, USA), using an automated QIAcube nucleic acid extractor (Qiagen GmbH, Hilden, Germany). DNA was stored at − 20 °C until further analysis. A negative extraction control was processed along with each batch of 12 samples. DNA specimens were initially screened for the presence of microfilaria by using a conventional PCR targeting the 5.8S-internal transcribed spacer (ITS) 2–28S regions of the genome. Briefly, pan-filarial primer pair − DIDR-F1 and DIDR-R1 − amplifying products with distinct molecular weights were used to differentiate nine filarial species, namely Acanthocheilonema dracunculoides (584 base pairs [bp]), Acanthocheilonema reconditum (578 bp), Brugia malayi (615 bp), Brugia pahangi (664 bp), Brugia timori (625 bp), Dirofilaria immitis (542 bp), Dirofilaria repens (484 bp), Mansonella ozzardi (430 bp) and Onchocerca volvulus (470 bp). For all reactions, a total of 5 μl of genomic DNA was added to 12.5 μl Xpert Fast Hotstart Mastermix (2×) with dye (GRiSP, Porto, Portugal), 5.5 μl of deionized sterile water and 1 μl (10 μM) of each of the DIDR-F1 and DIDR-R1 primers in a 25-μl final volume of the reaction mixture. The reactions were carried out in an automatic DNA thermal cycler 100 (Bio-Rad Laboratories, Hercules, CA, USA), including negative and positive controls (extracted from an adult female D. immitis). The PCR amplification products were visualized by Xpert Green DNA Stain direct (GRiSP, Porto, Portugal) fluorescence after electrophoresis in a 1.5% agarose gel at 100 V for 40 min. To confirm species identification, all amplicons of expected size were sequenced bidirectionally for genetic characterization. Briefly, amplicons were purified with GRS PCR & Gel Band Purification Kit (GRiSP, Porto, Portugal), and bidirectional sequencing was performed by Sanger method, using the respective primers. Sequences were manually corrected using the BioEdit Sequence Alignment Editor v 7.1.9 software package, version 2.1 (Ibis Biosciences, Carlsbad, CA, USA), and further analyses were performed by comparison with the sequences available in the NCBI (GenBank) nucleotide database (http://blast.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/Blast). Phylogenetic analysis was performed using MEGA version 6.0 software [9]. The obtained consensus sequences in this study and representative sequences for O. volvulus, D. immitis and D. repens obtained from GenBank were used for the phylogenetic analysis. Maximum likelihood (ML) method was applied. The ML bootstrap values were estimated using 1000 replicates with Tamura 3‐parameter as the correction model, estimated as the best substitution model by MEGA version 6.0 software. We deposited the 5.8S-ITS2-28S of D. immitis sequences recovered in this study in GenBank.

Results and discussion

For the initial detection of D. immitis infection, out of the 61 wild carnivores screened by rapid antigen detection, three had D. immitis antigen circulation in blood (4.9%; 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.0 − 13.7). All three wild carnivores showing antigenemia were foxes, yielding an occurrence of 15.8% (95% CI 3.4−39.6). The same 61 animals were again tested for microfilaremia through conventional PCR, and only two wolves (1.6%; 95% CI 0.0−8.8) tested positive, with a prevalence in the whole sampled lupine population of 4.8% (95% CI 0.6 − 16.2). Both positive samples yielded amplicons with 542 bp, being presumptively positive for D. immitis. After bidirectional sequencing, the consensus sequences showed to be identical. Basic Local Alignment Search Tool confirmed the identity (100%) of D. immitis in both lupine samples. The following accession numbers were assigned to the sequences obtained in this work: OK632269 and OK632270. One of the sequences obtained (OK632270) spanned only 77 nucleotides (nt); hence, phylogenetic analysis was performed with the other sequence. Phylogenetic analysis based on the 460 nt partial region of the 5.8S-ITS2-28S regions showed clustering with D. immitis (Fig. 1).

Fig. 1
figure 1

Phylogenetic analysis of D. immitis found in wolves in Portugal. The evolutionary history was inferred by using the ML method based on the Tamura 3‐parameter model. The analysis involved eight sequences. The D. immitis sequence characterized in this study is represented by sample code (L2) followed by the GenBank accession number (OK632269). Other sequences are represented with the species name followed by the corresponding accession number and country. Branch lengths are measured as the number of substitutions per site. Reliability of internal branches was assessed using the bootstrapping method (1000 replicates)

The present study evaluated D. immitis occurrence in a population of Portuguese wolves and foxes by searching for both D. immitis antigens and D. immitis microfilaremia, using a RIM test and a species-specific PCR assay followed by sequence confirmation, respectively. Dirofilaria immitis is usually detected by specific antigen testing and/or identification of microfilariae [1]. Despite the negative heartworm antigen test result, the infected animals may still show microfilaremia in the blood [1]. In Europe, eight species of filarioids, including zoonotic species, have been reported mainly in domestic dogs, and occasionally in wild carnivores [10]. Species discrimination is of high clinical and epidemiological importance because of zoonotic concerns and therapeutic implications [1]. The application of molecular analysis targeting filarial DNA is a highly sensitive and specific analytical tool for the diagnosis and simultaneous characterization of filarial infections, thus being an extremely valuable approach [1].

In this study, none of the 42 wolf samples presented evidence for D. immitis antigenemia. Nevertheless, two wolves were positive for D. immitis microfilaremia by PCR (4.8%; 95% CI 0.6–16.2%). Although Dirofilaria microfilaremia does not necessarily correlate to an endangerment of the infected animal's health, the individual can act as a reservoir for further infection if the intermediate mosquito host is present [1]. To the best of our knowledge, only one study has reported that wolves were suitable Dirofilaria hosts and appeared exposed to infection similarly to sympatric unprotected dogs [7]. Until today, microfilaremia had never been found, thus hampering the assessment of the impact of wolves on infection maintenance.

Interestingly, the present study shows that none of the foxes presented microfilaremia, but three were positive for D. immitis antigenemia (15.8%; 95% CI 3.4–39.6). Variable occurrences have been reported, namely 6.4% in Australia [11], 32.3% in Spain [12], 1.6% in Serbia [13], 3.7% in Hungary [14], 25.2% in Bulgaria [15], 0.3% in Romania [10] and 2% in France [16]. In Portugal, the prevalence of D. immitis detected by necropsy of red foxes ranged from 3.2% in northern-central locations, such as Coimbra district [17], to 11.8% in southern and central districts, such as Santarém and Setúbal [18]. In a serological survey conducted in red foxes in Portugal, 8.5% (10/118) were positive for D. immitis circulating antigens, with positive animals found in northern and southern areas [3]. It should be noted that the lack of microfilaremia can be related to several factors, including unisexual infections, pre-patency or the host's immune response leading to the elimination of microfilariae. Comparisons between studies should be made with caution as different assays with distinct sensitivities/specificities were used.

Conclusions

The present study provides molecular and serological evidence for D. immitis infection in wild carnivore species present in Portugal, supporting their potential epidemiological role. While in endemic areas frequent chemoprophylactic treatments of domestic dogs reduce the overall prevalence of the infection, wild canids might play a crucial role in the maintenance of infection. Understanding infection and disease prevalence in wild canids is especially important because these may act as reservoirs, increasing the risk of infection for domestic pets, including urban canids [19]. Infected microfilaremic carnivores may, in the presence of competent vector species, also act as reservoir hosts. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first detection of D. immitis microfilaremia in wolves, supporting that these animals can have a role as D. immitis reservoirs.

Availability of data and materials

Data supporting the conclusions of this article are included within the article.

Abbreviations

bp:

Base pairs

CI:

Confidence interval

ITS:

Internal transcribed spacer

ML:

Maximum likelihood

nt:

Nucleotide(s)

PCR:

Polymerase chain reaction

RIM:

Rapid immunomigration

References

  1. Rishniw M, Barr SC, Simpson KW, Fongillo MF, Franz M, Dominguez Alpizar JL. Discrimination between six species of canine microfilariae by a single polymerase chain reaction. Vet Parasitol. 2006;2006(135):303–14.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Mirchev R, Trifonova A, Panayotova-Pencheva M. Dirofilaria immitis in foxes (Vulpes vulpes, Linnaeus, 1758) in different areas from Bulgaria. Sci Technol. 2013;3:38–42.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Alho AM, Meireles J, Schnyder M, Cardoso L, Belo S, Deplazes P, et al. Dirofilaria immitis and Angiostrongylus vasorum: the current situation of two major canine heartworms in Portugal. Vet Parasitol. 2018;252:120–6.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Alho AM, Nunes T, Rinaldi L, Meireles J, Belo S, Deplazes P, et al. Transmission risk of Dirofilariosis in Portugal. Parasit Vectors. 2014;7(Suppl. 1):O16.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Instituto de Meteorologia de Portugal and Agencia Estatal de Meteorología, Ministerio de Medio Ambiente y Medio Rural y Marino, Gobierno de España. Iberian climate atlas. Air temperature and precipitation (1971−2000). State Meteorological Agency (AEMet), Ministry of the Environment and Rural and Marine Affairs, Government of Spain and Institute of Metereology of Portugal (IM); 2011.

  6. Otranto D, Deplazes P. Zoonotic nematodes of wild carnivores. Int J Parasitol Parasites Wildl. 2019;9:370–83.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Moroni B, Rossi L, Meneguz PG, Orusa R, Zoppi S, Robetto S, et al. Dirofilaria immitis in wolves recolonizing northern Italy: are wolves competent hosts? Parasit Vectors. 2020;13:482.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Morchón R, Carretón E, González-Miguel J, Mellado-Hernández I. Heartworm disease (Dirofilaria immitis) and their vectors in Europe—new distribution trends. Front Physiol. 2012;3:196.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Tamura K, Stecher G, Peterson D, Filipski A, Kumar S. MEGA6: molecular evolutionary genetics analysis version 6.0. Mol Biol Evol. 2013;30:2725–9.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Ionică AM, Matei IA, D’Amico G, Ababii J, Daskalaki AA, Sándor AD, et al. Filarioid infections in wild carnivores: a multispecies survey in Romania. Parasit Vectors. 2017;10:332.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Marks CA, Bloomfield TE. Canine heartworm (Dirofilaria immitis) detected in red foxes (Vulpes vulpes) in urban Melbourne. Vet Parasitol. 1998;78:147–54.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Gortazar C, Castillo JA, Lucientes J, Blanco JC, Arriolabengoa A, Calvete C. Factors affecting Dirofilaria immitis prevalence in red foxes in northeastern Spain. J Wildl Dis. 1994;30:545–7.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Penezić A, Selaković S, Pavlović I, Ćirović D. First findings and prevalence of adult heartworms (Dirofilaria immitis) in wild carnivores from Serbia. Parasitol Res. 2014;113:3281–5.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Tolnai Z, Széll Z, Sproch Á, Szeredi L, Sréter T. Dirofilaria immitis: an emerging parasite in dogs, red foxes and golden jackals in Hungary. Vet Parasitol. 2014;203:339–42.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Panayotova-Pencheva MS, Mirchev RL, Trifinova AP. Dirofilaria immitis infection in carnivores from Bulgaria. Bulg J Vet Med. 2016;19:153–62.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Medkour H, Laidoudi Y, Marié JL, Fenollar F, Davoust B, Mediannikov O. Molecular investigation of vector-borne pathogens in red foxes (Vulpes vulpes) from Southern France. J Wildl Dis. 2020;56:837–50.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Eira C, Vingada J, Torres J, Miquel J. The helminth community of the red fox, Vulpes vulpes, in Dunas de Mira (Portugal) and its effect on host condition. Wildl Biol Pract. 2006;2:26–36.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Carvalho-Varela M, Marcos MVM. A helmintofauna da raposa (Vulpes vulpes silacea Miller, 1907) in Portugal. Acta Parasit Port. 1993;1:73–9.

    Google Scholar 

  19. Pluemer M, Dubay S, Drake D, Crimmins S, Veverka T, Hovanec H, et al. Red foxes (Vulpes vulpes) and coyotes (Canis latrans) in an urban landscape: prevalence and risk factors for disease. J Urban Ecol. 2019;5:1–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

Publication of this paper has been sponsored by Elanco Animal Health in the framework of the 17th CVBD® World Forum Symposium.

Funding

This work was supported by national funds, through Fundação para a Ciência e a Tecnologia (FCT, Portuguese Foundation for Science and Technology), under projects UIDB/04750/2020 and LA/P/0064/2020; and projects UIDB/CVT/00772/2020 and LA/P/0059/2020, also funded by FCT.

Author information

Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

SGdS: conducted sample collection and testing and drafted the manuscript; SSS: conducted testing and data analysis; AdSM: conducted testing and data analysis; PFB, IA: supervised the study, conducted data analysis and drafted the manuscript; LC: supervised the study and interpreted data; JRM: supervised the study, designed the work and interpreted data. All authors have read and approved the final manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Luís Cardoso.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate

All procedures complied with the Portuguese legislation for the protection of animals used for scientific purposes (i.e. Decree-Law no. 113/2013 of 7 August 2013), which transposes European legislation (i.e. Directive 2010/63/EU of the European Parliament and of the Council of 22 September 2010).

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Gomes-de-Sá, S., Santos-Silva, S., Moreira, A.d. et al. Dirofilaria immitis antigenemia and microfilaremia in Iberian wolves and red foxes from Portugal. Parasites Vectors 15, 119 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1186/s13071-022-05170-5

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s13071-022-05170-5

Keywords

  • Dirofilaria immitis
  • Foxes
  • Wolves
  • Portugal
  • Wildlife