Evaluation of the effectiveness of BG-Sentinel and CDC light traps in assessing the abundance, richness, and community composition of mosquitoes in rural and natural areas

Table 3 SIMPER (similarity percentage) analysis of which species contributed the most to the observed differences comparing BG-sentinel and CDC light traps

Species	Average dissimilarity	Contribution (%)	Cumulative contribution (%)
Culex nigripalpus	44.36	54.98	54.98
Anopheles crucians	12.4	15.37	70.36
Culex erraticus	7.54	9.35	79.71
Mansonia dyari	6.18	7.66	87.38
Anopheles quadrimaculatus	3.34	4.15	91.53
Culex panocossa	2.40	2.97	94.51
Mansonia titillans	1.86	2.30	96.81
Aedes atlanticus	1.68	2.08	98.9
Psorophora columbiae	0.16	0.20	99.11
Culex interrogator	0.15	0.19	99.3
Aedes tortilis	0.15	0.19	99.49
Aedes taeniorhynchus	0.14	0.18	99.67
Uranotaenia lowii	0.06	0.07	99.75
Anopheles walkeri	0.05	0.06	99.81
Culex coronator	0.03	0.04	99.86
Aedes infirmatus	0.03	0.04	99.9
Uranotaenia sapphirina	0.03	0.03	99.94
Aedes scapularis	0.01	0.01	99.96
Aedeomyia squamipennis	0.01	0.01	99.97
Wyeomyia mitchellii	0.008	0.01	99.98
Aedes albopictus	0.008	0.01	99.99
Coquillettidia perturbans	0.002	0.002	100
Wyeomyia vanduzeei	0.001	0.001	100
Culex quinquefasciatus	0.0009	0.001	100
Aedes triseriatus	0.0004	0.0005	100
Aedes condolescens	0.0002	0.0003	100

ISSN: 1756-3305