Skip to main content

Geographic distribution of the V1016G knockdown resistance mutation in Aedes albopictus: a warning bell for Europe

Abstract

Background

Colonization of large part of Europe by the Asian tiger mosquito Aedes albopictus is causing autochthonous transmission of chikungunya and dengue exotic arboviruses. While pyrethroids are recommended only to reduce/limit transmission, they are widely implemented to reduce biting nuisance and to control agricultural pests, increasing the risk of insurgence of resistance mechanisms. Worryingly, pyrethroid resistance (with mortality < 70%) was recently reported in Ae. albopictus populations from Italy and Spain and associated with the V1016G point mutation in the voltage-sensitive sodium channel gene conferring knockdown resistance (kdr). Genotyping pyrethroid resistance-associated kdr mutations in field mosquito samples represents a powerful approach to detect early signs of resistance without the need for carrying out phenotypic bioassays which require availability of live mosquitoes, dedicated facilities and appropriate expertise.

Methods

Here we report results on the PCR-genotyping of the V1016G mutation in 2530 Ae. albopictus specimens from 69 sampling sites in 19 European countries.

Results

The mutation was identified in 12 sites from nine countries (with allele frequencies ranging from 1 to 8%), mostly distributed in two geographical clusters. The western cluster includes Mediterranean coastal sites from Italy, France and Malta as well as single sites from both Spain and Switzerland. The eastern cluster includes sites on both sides of the Black Sea in Bulgaria, Turkey and Georgia as well as one site from Romania. These results are consistent with genomic data showing high connectivity and close genetic relationship among West European populations and a major barrier to gene flow between West European and Balkan populations.

Conclusions

The results of this first effort to map kdr mutations in Ae. albopictus on a continental scale show a widespread presence of the V1016G allele in Europe, although at lower frequencies than those previously reported from Italy. This represents a wake-up call for mosquito surveillance programs in Europe to include PCR-genotyping of pyrethroid resistance alleles, as well as phenotypic resistance assessments, in their routine activities.

Graphical Abstract

Background

In the last few decades, mosquito-borne arboviruses (i.e. arthropod-borne viruses, such as dengue and chikungunya) have undergone an extraordinary spread as a consequence of the colonization of large tropical and temperate regions by invasive Aedes mosquito species [1, 2]. In particular, in less than 40 years, Aedes albopictus has invaded all continents except Antarctica—thanks to the capacity of its eggs to sustain both dessication and low temperatures—and has become an increasing public health concern also in temperate regions. In fact, several autochthonous outbreaks of dengue (dengue virus [DENV] in Croatia, France, Spain and Italy [3,4,5]) and two major chikungunya (chikungunya virus [CHIKV]) outbreaks in Italy [6, 7] have been reported since the species’ appearance in Europe. Since no specific medical treatment exists for these diseases, integrated vector management is the only available strategy to limit the public health burden [8].

To reduce mosquito nuisance and the risk of disease outbreaks, European guidelines for the surveillance of invasive mosquitoes [9] recommend larval source reduction and larvicide applications. In contrast, pyrethroid-based adulticidal interventions are recommended only in the cases of ongoing—or high risk of—virus transmission, when a fast and effective abatement of adult mosquitoes is necessary. Pyrethroids, which are the only insecticide class for mosquito adulticide spraying registered in Europe [10, 11], interact with the voltage-sensitive sodium channel (VSSC) and interfere with the transmission of nervous signals, resulting in fast knockdown and eventually death of the mosquito [12]. However, their effectiveness is increasingly compromised by the rise of insecticide resistance. This is observed in all major mosquito vector species, including Aedes aegypti and Afrotropical malaria vectors, and has been recently reported in Ae. albopictus populations from both the native [13,14,15,16,17,18,19,20] and the invasive ranges [21,22,23,24,25,26], including populations in Italy and Spain [27,28,29].

Target site mutations in the vssc gene, conferring knockdown resistance (kdr), are among the best-characterized mechanisms contributing to pyrethroid resistance across all major mosquito vector species. These kdr mutations weaken the binding of the pyrethroid insecticide to the sodium channel, thereby reducing the knockdown effect [12]. Studies on Ae. aegypti have identified several point mutations (reviewed by Moyes et al. [30]) in the S6 transmembrane segments of domain II and III of the VSSC protein that constitute the pyrethroid binding site [31]. Among these, V410L, S989P, I1011M, V1016G and F1534C show the strongest association with resistance phenotypes [30]. Moreover, several mutations act synergistically, resulting in enhanced levels of resistance. In particular, functional assays showed that, compared to the wild type, the co-occurrence of the three mutations S989P, V1016G and F1534C decreases the susceptibility to permethrin and deltamethrin by 1100- and 90-fold, respectively [32].

Despite studies having so far mostly focused on major vector species, in the last decade a few mutations within the vssc gene have also been identified in Ae. albopictus, in particular in positions 1534 (F1534C/S/L/W/R; [19, 33,34,35,36]), 1016 (V1016G/I [34, 36, 37]) and 1532 (I1532T [38]). Among these, the only alleles confirmed to be associated with strong pyrethroid resistance phenotypes are 1534C [37], 1534S [18, 36, 37, 39] and 1016G [29, 37]. The latter has been shown to confer the highest levels of resistance to different pyrethroids [32, 37] and has been reported from the species native range [34, 36, 37], as well as from Reunion Island in the Indian Ocean [34]. In the European region, it has only been detected in Italy, where it is widespread and reaches alarming frequencies of up to 45% in some coastal sites [29, 40].

Genotyping pyrethroid resistance-associated mutations in mosquito samples from natural populations represents a powerful approach to detect early signs of resistance without the need of carrying out phenotypic bioassays that require availability of live mosquitoes, dedicated facilities and appropriate expertise [41]. Indeed, PCR-based approaches have proved to be instrumental in monitoring the onset and spread of kdr alleles and in raising awareness of insecticide resistance in Ae. aegypti and major malaria vectors [41].

The aim of this work was to map the presence and frequency of the V1016G mutation in Ae. albopictus populations across Europe.

Methods

European Ae. albopictus specimens were sampled between 2015 and 2020 within the framework of AIM-COST Action (http://www.aedescost.eu) and of the ARBOMONITOR projects. Mosquitoes were collected by either ovitraps, larval sampling or adult trapping methods (see Additional file 1: Table S1). Larvae collected in the field or hatched from ovitrap-collected eggs were reared to adults under standard insectary conditions.

The DNA was extracted from single legs or whole individual mosquito carcasses using the DNAzol® [42] or CTAB [43] methods. The allele-specific PCR (AS-PCR) assay for V1016G genotyping was performed either on DNA extracted from single specimens or on pooled DNA extracted from three specimens [40]. In the case of detection of the 1016G allele in one of the pools, genotyping by PCR of each of the three specimens was performed separately.

For a subset of specimens, a fragment of domain II of the vssc gene was sequenced following the protocol described by Kasai et al. [37]. This comprised all specimens identified as either homozygotes or heterozygotes for the mutated 1016G allele by AS-PCR, as well as a subset of randomly chosen homozygotes for the susceptible 1016V allele from each country. PCR products were purified using the SureClean Kit (Bioline; Meridian Bioscience, Cincinnati, OH, USA), and the amplicons were sequenced either at BMR Genomics s.r.l. (Padua, Italy) or at STAB Vida (Oeiras, Portugal). Results from sequencing and AS-PCR genotyping were compared and the accuracy of the AS-PCR was estimated as the number of correct assessments divided by the total number of observations, taking the DNA sequencing results as the gold standard. Genotyping results were deposited in VectorBase.org (Project ID: VBP0000793). An interactive map reporting frequencies of the V1016G mutation per site (including also reports from previous publications; [29, 40]) was created using the Leaflet package for R (https://rstudio.github.io/leaflet/) in R studio version 2019. The database was better visualized by exploiting “tydiverse” and “ddply.” Finally, the “classInt” package was used to obtain the scales of frequency of V1016G. The interactive map code and the data are available at https://randomxsk8.github.io/MedEnt_Sapienza/resist_map.html.

Results and discussion

Here we report for the first time the presence of the V1016G mutation in European Ae. albopictus populations outside Italy. Overall, 2530 specimens from 69 sampling sites in 19 European countries were PCR-genotyped (Additional file 1:Table S1). For a subsample of 265 specimens, a fragment of domain II of the vssc gene, including position 1016, was also sequenced to validate the PCR results. Consistently with the results reported by Pichler et al. [40], the AS-PCR assay accuracy was 94%. All mismatches (N = 16) between AS-PCR and sequencing were due to specimens homozygous for the 1016V susceptible allele and PCR-genotyped as heterozygotes (Table 1). This result confirms the previously reported slight overestimation of mutant allele detection by AS-PCR [40] and highlights the relevance of confirming PCR results by sequencing individuals carrying the resistant 1016G allele, particularly when the allele is detected for the first time in a region. Sequence analysis of the 16 incorrectly PCR-genotyped specimens did not reveal mutations in primer binding sites. Since 12 out of the 16 specimens came from only three sampling sites (i.e. Burgas in Bulgaria, Bucharest in Romania and Basauri in Spain), it is possible to hypothesize that low-quality DNA may have biased the PCR reaction.

Table 1 Comparison of genotyping results obtained by sequencing the V1016G knockdown resistance mutation of the vssc gene in Aedes albopictus and by allele-specific-PCR assay

Noteworthy, the amino acid valine at position 1016 of the VSSC protein was encoded by the GTG codon instead of the wild-type GTA codon in five specimens, including two heterozygote GTA/GTG specimens, one homozygote GTG/GTG specimen from Greece and two heterozygote GTA/GTG specimens from Serbia. This synonymous substitution has already been observed in Italian specimens [40] and shown to have no impact on AS-PCR results. Moreover, as already described by Zhou et al. [36] and Pichler et al. [40], the amplicon lengths varied by about 10 bp. This variation is due to insertions present in the intron 20 of the vssc gene, abutting codon position 1016. However, this does not interfere with the correct identification of the 1016V and 1016G alleles.

The combined AS-PCR and sequencing results reveal the presence of the 1016G allele at 12 sites from nine countries, at frequencies ranging from 1 to 8% per sampling site (Fig. 1; Table 2; Additional file 1: Table S1). However, the sample size for some of the sites are low (Additional file 1: Table S1), and no detection of the 1016G mutation in these samples may imply low frequencies rather than absence in the whole population. Despite this limitation, we observed a spatial trend with the resistant allele being mostly detected in two clusters. The first cluster, hereafter called the “Western Cluster,” includes mainly Mediterranean coastal sites from Italy (Rome and Bari), France (Nice and Perpignan) and Malta (Luqa) but also sites in Spain (Basauri) and Switzerland (Basel). The second cluster, hereafter called the “Eastern cluster,” includes the easternmost sites on both sides of the Black sea from Bulgaria (Burgas), Turkey (Istanbul and Igneada) and Georgia (Batumi) as well as one site from Romania (Bucharest). Whether the observed clusters correspond to independent mutation or introduction events or reflect dispersal through migration and gene flow from the same source populations remains to be understood. Intriguingly, population genomic studies tracking the invasion history of Ae. albopictus in Europe revealed a pattern consistent with that of the 1016G kdr allele distribution. These studies showed high connectivity and close genetic relationship among Western European populations and identify Italian populations as possible bridgeheads for the invasion of other Western European countries [44,45,46]. In line with the present results, the same studies suggest that the populations from Eastern Europe originated from a different source population and that a major barrier to gene flow exists between Western European and Balkan clusters.

Fig. 1
figure 1

Distribution of the V1016V knockdown locus (kdr) in the gene encoding the voltage-sensitive sodium channel (vssc) in Aedes albopictus across Europe. Each dot represents a sampling site, while the size corresponds to the number of specimens that were PCR-genotyped for the V1016V kdr locus from that site. Details on the sampling sites and the 1016G allele frequencies per site are given in Additional file 1: Table S1. Green dots represent samples with wild-type 1016V allele only; blue dots represent samples where the kdr 1016G allele was detected. The georeferenced map was produced using the leaflet package (https://rstudio.github.io/leaflet/) in RStudio 4.1.2 with map data from OpenStreetMap contributor

Table 2 Genotype and allele frequencies across European countries for wild-type (1016V) and mutated (1016G) alleles at position 1016 of the vssc gene in Aedes albopictus field populations sampled across Europe

In this study, we focused on the detection of the 1016G mutation. However, other kdr mutations conferring pyrethroid resistance could contribute to a reduction in the susceptibility to pyrethroids and might even co-occur with the 1016G variant. In Aedes aegypti, a combination of the 1016G and 1534C alleles was found to have a strong synergistic effect, conferring increased resistance to pyrethroids in individuals carrying both mutations [32, 47]. In Ae. albopictus, specimens carrying both alleles have not been reported yet, despite both mutations in positions 1016 and 1534 circulate in populations from the native range in Vietnam [37] and China [34, 36]. Therefore, it would not come as a surprise to find co-occurrence of the two alleles also in Eastern Europe since the 1016G allele is found in countries neighboring Greece and mutation F1534C has been reported from Greece at frequencies up to 68% [48]. Moreover, the F1534C allele could likely be introduced into Italy by passive dispersal of Ae. albopictus specimens across the sea between Italy and Greece through extensive maritime traffic. Therefore, we highly recommend extending the insecticide resistance monitoring to include additional PCR diagnostics for alternative kdr alleles, including F1534C [49], and assessing the phenotype of possibly found multi-locus resistant populations.

Conclusions

Genotyping of kdr mutations in major mosquito vector species such as Ae. aegypti and Afrotropical malaria vectors species has proven to be instrumental to trigger pyrethroid resistance management plans to slow down or reverse resistance spreading [41]. The present study represents the first effort to map the V1016G kdr mutation in Ae. albopictus on a continental scale in Europe.

On the one hand, results show that the very high frequencies previously reported from Italy are unparalleled in other European countries, consistently with a more extensive and/or protracted pyrethroid selective pressure in Italy. On the other hand, the presence of the 1016G allele in European populations both west and east of Italy represents a wake-up call for mosquito surveillance programs and highlights the need to include the monitoring of pyrethroid resistance in their activities. PCR genotyping of kdr-alleles represents a cost-effective and sensible tool to do this and, in case of detection of a sharp increase in frequencies, would allow timely implementation of policies to counteract inappropriate pyrethroid spraying for nuisance reduction and/or impose rotation of different pyrethroid-based adulticides for mosquito control. Notably, since insecticide use against agricultural pests is also known to represent an additional source of selective pressure for pyrethroid resistance in mosquitoes, rotation of different insecticidal compounds or enhanced integrated control measures in agriculture should also be considered [50]. This would prevent the risk of a reduced efficacy of emergency spraying in the case of an arbovirus outbreak.

Finally, the interactive map made available in this study includes all data so far available on 1016G allele distribution in Europe and will be updated with results from future genotyping studies on this and other kdr alleles. The map represents an easy tool for public health officers and private companies involved in mosquito control to assess the risk of pyrethroid resistance spreading in their regions in the early phases (i.e. when the frequency of V1016G or other kdr alleles is still low), thus opening the possibility to activate monitoring and management activities, instead of simply increasing pyrethroid concentrations, with inevitable harm to the environment and non-target species.

Availability of data and materials

All data presented in the article are included in the article and its supplementary files; genotyping/sequencing data have been submitted to VectorBase.org (Project ID: VBP0000793).

References

  1. WHO. A global brief on vector-borne diseases. 2014. https://apps.who.int/iris/handle/10665/111008. Accessed 8 Dec 2020.

  2. Weaver SC, Reisen WK. Present and future arboviral threaths. Antiviral Res. 2010;85:328.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Succo T, Leparc-Goffart I, Ferré J, Roiz D, Broche B, Maquart M, et al. Autochthonous dengue outbreak in Nimes, South of France, July to September 2015. Euro Surveill. 2016;21:1–7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Gjenero-Margan I, Aleraj B, Krajcar D, Lesnikar V, Klobučar A, Pem-Novosel I, et al. Autochthonous dengue fever in Croatia, August–September 2010. Euro Surveill. 2011;16:19805.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Lazzarini L, Barzon L, Foglia F, Manfrin V, Pacenti M, Pavan G, et al. First autochthonous dengue outbreak in Italy, August 2020. Euro Surveill. 2020;1:8–11.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Rezza G, Nicoletti L, Angelini R, Romi R, Finarelli A, Panning M, et al. Infection with chikungunya virus in Italy: an outbreak in a temperate region. Lancet. 2007;370:1840–6.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Venturi G, Di Luca M, Fortuna C, Remoli ME, Riccardo F, Severini F, et al. Detection of a chikungunya outbreak in Central Italy, August to September 2017. Euro Surveill. 2017;22:17-00646. https://doi.org/10.2807/1560-7917.ES.2017.22.39.17-00646.

  8. Bellini R, Michaelakis A, Petrić D, Schaffner F, Alten B, Angelini P, et al. Practical management plan for invasive mosquito species in Europe: I. Asian tiger mosquito (Aedes albopictus). Travel Med Infect Dis. 2020. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tmaid.2020.101691.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. European Centre for Disease Prevention and Control (ECDC). Guidelines for the surveillance of invasive mosquitoes in Europe. 2012. https://www.ecdc.europa.eu/en/disease-vectors/surveillance-and-disease-data/guidelines-mosquito. Accessed 28 Oct 2020.

  10. The European Parliament and the Council of the European Union. EU Directive 98/8, Biocidal products directive 98/8. 1998. https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/?uri=CELEX%3A31998L0008&qid=1659472595177. Accessed 17 Sept 2018.

  11. The European Parliament and the Council of the European Union. EU Directive 528/2012, Biocidal products regulation 528/2012. 2012. https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/?uri=CELEX%3A32012R0528&qid=1659472454294. Accessed 01 Oct 2018.

  12. Soderlund DM. Molecular mechanisms of pyrethroid insecticide neurotoxicity: recent advances. Arch Toxicol. 2012;86:165–81.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Chuaycharoensuk T, Juntarajumnong W, Boonyuan W, Bangs MJ, Akratanakul P, Thammapalo S, et al. Frequency of pyrethroid resistance in Aedes aegypti and Aedes albopictus (Diptera: Culicidae) in Thailand. J Vector Ecol. 2011;36:204–12.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Ishak IH, Jaal Z, Ranson H, Wondji CS. Contrasting patterns of insecticide resistance and knockdown resistance (kdr) in the dengue vectors Aedes aegypti and Aedes albopictus from Malaysia. Parasit Vectors. 2015;8:181.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Lee RML, Choong CTH, Goh BPL, Ng LC, Lam-Phua SG. Bioassay and biochemical studies of the status of pirimiphos-methyl and cypermethrin resistance in Aedes (Stegomyia) aegypti and Aedes (Stegomyia) albopictus (Diptera: Culicidae) in Singapore. Trop Biomed. 2014;31:670–9.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Thanispong K, Sathantriphop S, Malaithong N, Bangs MJ, Chareonviriyaphap T. Establishment of diagnostic doses of five pyrethroids for monitoring physiological resistance in Aedes albopictus in Thailand. J Am Mosq Control Assoc. 2015;31:346–52.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Liu H, Liu L, Cheng P, Yang L, Chen J, Lu Y, et al. Bionomics and insecticide resistance of Aedes albopictus in Shandong, a high latitude and high-risk dengue transmission area in China. Parasit Vectors. 2020;13:11. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13071-020-3880-2.

  18. Gao JP, Chen HM, Shi H, Peng H, Ma YJ. Correlation between adult pyrethroid resistance and knockdown resistance (kdr) mutations in Aedes albopictus (Diptera: Culicidae) field populations in China. Infect Dis Poverty. 2018;7:86. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40249-018-0471-y.

  19. Chen H, Li K, Wang X, Yang X, Lin Y, Cai F, et al. First identification of kdr allele F1534S in VGSC gene and its association with resistance to pyrethroid insecticides in Aedes albopictus populations from Haikou City, Hainan Island. China Infect Dis Poverty. 2016;5:1–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Su X, Guo Y, Deng J, Xu J, Zhou G, Zhou T, et al. Fast emerging insecticide resistance in Aedes albopictus in Guangzhou, China: alarm to the dengue epidemic. PLoS Negl Trop Dis. 2019;13:1–15.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Kamgang B, Marcombe S, Chandre F, Nchoutpouen E, Nwane P, Etang J, et al. Insecticide susceptibility of Aedes aegypti and Aedes albopictus in Central Africa. Parasit Vectors. 2011;4:79.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Ngoagouni C, Kamgang B, Brengues C, Yahouedo G, Paupy C, Nakouné E, et al. Susceptibility profile and metabolic mechanisms involved in Aedes aegypti and Aedes albopictus resistant to DDT and deltamethrin in the Central African Republic. Parasit Vectors. 2016;9:599. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13071-016-1887-5.

  23. Arslan A, Rathor HR, Mukhtar MU, Mushtaq S, Bhatti A, Asif M, et al. Spatial distribution and insecticide susceptibility status of Aedes aegypti and Aedes albopictus in dengue affected urban areas of Rawalpindi, Pakistan. J Vector Borne Dis. 2016;53:136–43.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Kushwah RBS, Mallick PK, Ravikumar H, Dev V, Kapoor N, Adak T, et al. Status of DDT and pyrethroid resistance in Indian Aedes albopictus and absence of knockdown resistance (kdr) mutation. J Vector Borne Dis. 2015;52:95–8.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Sivan A, Shriram AN, Sunish IP, Vidhya PT. Studies on insecticide susceptibility of Aedes aegypti (Linn) and Aedes albopictus (Skuse) vectors of dengue and chikungunya in Andaman and Nicobar Islands, India. Parasitol Res. 2015;114:4693–702.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Richards SL, Anne J, Balanay G, White AV, Hope J, Vandock K, et al. Insecticide susceptibility screening against Culex and Aedes (diptera: culicidae) mosquitoes from the United States. J Med Entomol. 2018;55:398–407.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Bengoa M, Eritja R, Delacour S, Miranda MÁ, Sureda A, Lucientes J. First data on resistance to pyrethroids in wild populations of Aedes albopictus from Spain. J Am Mosq Control Assoc. 2017;33:246–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Pichler V, Bellini R, Veronesi R, Arnoldi D, Rizzoli A, Lia RP, et al. First evidence of resistance to pyrethroid insecticides in Italian Aedes albopictus populations after 26 years since invasion. Pest Manag Sci. 2018;74:1319-27. https://doi.org/10.1002/ps.4840.

  29. Pichler V, Malandruccolo C, Serini P, Bellini R, Severini F, Toma L, et al. Phenotypic and genotypic pyrethroid resistance of Aedes albopictus, with focus on the 2017 chikungunya outbreak in Italy. Pest Manag Sci. 2019. https://doi.org/10.1002/ps.5369.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Moyes CL, Vontas J, Martins AJ, Ng LC, Koou SY, Dusfour I, et al. Contemporary status of insecticide resistance in the major Aedes vectors of arboviruses infecting humans. PLoS Negl Trop Dis. 2017;7:1–20.

    Google Scholar 

  31. O’Reilly AO, Khambay BPS, Williamson MS, Field LM, Wallace BA, Davies TGE. Modelling insecticide-binding sites in the voltage-gated sodium channel. Biochem J. 2006;396:255–63.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Hirata K, Komagata O, Itokawa K, Yamamoto A, Tomita T, Kasai S. A single crossing-over event in voltage-sensitive Na+ channel genes may cause critical failure of dengue mosquito control by insecticides. PLoS Negl Trop Dis. 2014;8(8):e308. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pntd.0003085.

  33. Kasai S, Ng LC, Lam-phua SG, Tang CS. First detection of a putative knockdown resistance gene in major mosquito vector, Aedes albopictus. Jpn J Infect Dis. 2011;64:217–21.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Tancredi A, Papandrea D, Marconcini M, Carballar-Lejarazu R, Casas-Martinez M, Lo E, et al. Tracing temporal and geographic distribution of resistance to pyrethroids in the arboviral vector Aedes albopictus. PLoS Negl Trop Dis. 2020;14:e0008350.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Chen H, Zhou Q, Dong H, Yuan H, Bai J, et al. The pattern of kdr mutations correlated with the temperature in field populations of Aedes albopictus in China. Parasit Vectors. 2021;14:1–10.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Zhou X, Yang C, Liu N, Li M, Tong Y, Zeng X, et al. Knockdown resistance (kdr) mutations within seventeen field populations of Aedes albopictus from Beijing China: first report of a novel V1016G mutation and evolutionary origins of kdr haplotypes. Parasit Vectors. 2019;12:180. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13071-019-3423-x.

  37. Kasai S, Caputo B, Tsunoda T, Cuong TC, Maekawa Y, Lam-phua SG, et al. First detection of a Vssc allele V1016G conferring a high level of insecticide resistance in Aedes albopictus collected from Europe (Italy) and Asia (Vietnam), 2016: a new emerging threat to controlling arboviral diseases. Euro Surveill. 2019;24:1–12.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  38. Xu J, Bonizzoni M, Zhong D, Zhou G, Cai S, Yan G, et al. Multi-country survey revealed prevalent and novel F1534S mutation in voltage-gated sodium channel (VGSC) gene in Aedes albopictus. PLoS Negl Trop Dis. 2016;10:e0004696.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  39. Yan R, Zhou Q, Xu Z, Zhu G, Dong K, Zhorov BS, et al. Three sodium channel mutations from Aedes albopictus confer resistance to type I, but not type II pyrethroids. Insect Biochem Mol Biol. 2020;123:103411.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  40. Pichler V, Mancini E, Micocci M, Calzetta M, Arnoldi D, Rizzoli A, et al. A novel allele specific polymerase chain reaction (AS-PCR) assay to detect the V1016G knockdown resistance mutation confirms its widespread presence in Aedes albopictus populations from Italy. Insects. 2021;12(1):79. https://doi.org/10.3390/insects12010079.

  41. Dusfour I, Vontas J, David J, Weetman D, Fonseca M, Corbel V, et al. Management of insecticide resistance in the major Aedes vectors of arboviruses: advances and challenges. PLoS Negl Trop Dis. 2019;13:e0007615.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  42. Rider MA, Byrd BD, Keating J, Wesson DM, Caillouet KA. PCR detection of malaria parasites in desiccated Anopheles mosquitoes is uninhibited by storage time and temperature. Malar J. 2012;11:193.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  43. Weeks AR, van Opijnen T, Breeuwer JAJ. AFLP fingerprinting for assessing intraspecific variation and genome mapping in mites. Exp Appl Acarol. 2000;24:775–93.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  44. Sherpa S, Blum MGB, Capblancq T, Cumer T, Rioux D, Després L. Unravelling the invasion history of the Asian tiger mosquito in Europe. Mol Ecol. 2019;28:2360–77.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  45. Pichler V, Kotsakiozi P, Caputo B, Serini P, Caccone A, della Torre A. Complex interplay of evolutionary forces shaping population genomic structure of invasive Aedes albopictus in southern Europe. PLoS Negl Trop Dis. 2019;13:e0007554.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  46. Kotsakiozi P, Evans BR, Gloria-Soria A, Kamgang B, Mayanja M, Lutwama J, et al. Population structure of a vector of human diseases: Aedes aegypti in its ancestral range, Africa. Ecol Evol. 2018;8:7835-48. https://doi.org/10.1002/ece3.4278.

  47. Dusfour I, Zorrilla P, Guidez A, Issaly J, Girod R, Guillaumot L, et al. Deltamethrin resistance mechanisms in Aedes aegypti populations from three French overseas territories worldwide. PLoS Negl Trop Dis. 2015;9:1–17.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  48. Balaska S, Fotakis EA, Kioulos I, Grigoraki L, Mpellou S, Chaskopoulou A, et al. Bioassay and molecular monitoring of insecticide resistance status in Aedes albopictus populations from Greece to support evidence—based vector control. Parasit Vectors. 2020;13:328. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13071-020-04204-0.

  49. Zhu CY, Zhao CC, Wang YG, Ma DL, Song XP, Wang J. Establishment of an innovative and sustainable PCR technique for 1534 locus mutation of the knockdown resistance (kdr) gene in the dengue vector Aedes albopictus. Parasit Vectors. 2019;12:603. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13071-019-3829-5.

  50. Michaelakis A, Balestrino F, Becker N, Bellini R, Caputo B, della Torre A, et al. A case for systematic quality management in mosquito control programmes in Europe. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021;18:3478. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph18073478.

Download references

Acknowledgements

This paper was produced in the framework of the COST Action Aedes Invasive Mosquitoes (CA17108; http://www.aedescost.eu) supported by the European Cooperation in Science and Technology (COST) www.cost.eu.

Funding

This work received financial support from: national funds through MUR-PRIN2020 to AdT; FCT—Fundação para a Ciência e a Tecnologia, I.P., in the framework of the project ARBOMONITOR (PTDC/BIA-OUT/29477/2017) and CESAM by FCT/MCTES (UIDP/50017/2020 + UIDB/50017/2020 + LA/P/0094/2020) a regional Spanish research project (Grant Number IB16135) to DBB; the Greece—LIFE CONOPS project (LIFE12 ENV/GR/000466), co-founded by the EU Environmental Funding Programme LIFE + Environment Policy and Governance. The founding sponsors had no role in the writing, preparation or submission of the manuscript.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

AdT, BC, JP, VP designed research; ALGP, AMic, AMih, AT, BC, CB, CH, DBB, DO, DP, ED, EFl, EFa, EM, ER, FC, FS, GBa, GBe, GLA, IP, JP, KK, MA, MAM, MK, MTR, OM, PM, RB, RM, RMA, RPL, SDE, TZ, VR and VV participated in mosquito sampling; VP, VV and MM performed the molecular analysis; BC, CV, MM, VP and VV analyzed the data; AdT, BC, JP, PM, VP and VV wrote the paper. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Alessandra della Torre.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate

Not applicable.

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary Information

Additional file 1: Table S1.

Detailed genotyping results and samples collections/ processing information per sampling site.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Pichler, V., Caputo, B., Valadas, V. et al. Geographic distribution of the V1016G knockdown resistance mutation in Aedes albopictus: a warning bell for Europe. Parasites Vectors 15, 280 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1186/s13071-022-05407-3

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s13071-022-05407-3

Keywords

  • Mosquito
  • Aedes albopictus
  • Insecticide resistance
  • Kdr
  • Europe
  • Integrated vector management
  • Arbovirus vector
  • Vector control