Skip to main content

Morphological description of Pintomyia (Pifanomyia) veintemillasi n. sp., a new sand fly species from the sub-Andean region of Bolivia



Most sand fly species are located in the Americas; some act as vectors of leishmaniasis and other human diseases. In Bolivia, about 25% of Neotropical species have been identified, and only a few have been implicated as vectors of cutaneous and visceral leishmaniasis. A new species of anthropophilic sand fly from the sub-Andean region of Alto Beni is described herein.


A large systematic entomological survey was carried out in a subtropical humid forest located in the Marimonos mountain range, at around 900 m altitude, in the municipality of Palos Blancos, Sud Yungas Province, Department of La Paz, Bolivia. Sand flies were captured over a period of 26 months between January 1982 and February 1984, at the ground and canopy level, using both CDC light traps and protected human bait. A total of 24,730 sand flies were collected on the ground, distributed in 16 species, and 3259 in the canopy, with eight species. One of these species was labeled as Pintomia (Pifanomyia) nevesi, although certain morphological features allowed us to doubt that it was that taxon. To define the identity of this sand fly, a re-evaluation (this work) was recently carried out through morphological analyses and measurements of the available specimens mounted on Euparal, previously labeled as Pi. (Pif.) nevesi.


Based on the morphological traits and measurements, the re-evaluated specimens were definitively identified as a new sand fly species, Pintomyia (Pifanomyia) veintemillasi, closely related to Pi. (Pif.) nevesi and Pintomyia (Pifanomyia) maranonensis within the Evansi series. This new sand fly was the third most numerous anthropophilic species at the floor (6.2%) and the second most numerous anthropophilic at the canopy (35.1%).


A new anthropophilic sand fly species is described as Pi. (Pif.) veintemillasi n. sp. This sand fly species was caught at about 900 m altitude in the Marimonos mountain range, a highly endemic area for cutaneous and mucosal leishmaniasis due to Leishmania (Viannia) braziliensis. Therefore, this species could be involved in the leishmaniasis transmission in the sub-Andean foothills of Alto Beni, Department of La Paz, Bolivia.

Graphical Abstract


Phlebotomine sand flies are natural vectors of around 30 kinetoplastids of the genus Leishmania, the bacterium Bartonella bacilliformis, and some arboviruses. The medical importance of sand flies is mostly related to their ability to transmit to humans at least 20 well-known Leishmania species, causing different clinical forms of leishmaniasis, with around two million people affected worldwide every year [1, 2].

For Neotropical sand flies, in the 1990s, Duncan and Young published what was considered the most complete compilation of the American phlebotomine sand flies at the time [1, 3]. Later, Galati proposed a new classification based on phylogenetic analysis which elevated to genus most of the subgenera proposed in the earliest classification [1, 2] and is currently the most widely accepted approach. According to Galati, the current list of American sand flies includes 539 species/subspecies (522 current and 17 fossil) distributed in 23 genera and 20 subgenera, three groups of species, and 30 series of species [2]. The taxonomic groups and series proposed are frequently used by sand fly taxonomists in the New World, although they are not familiar in the Old World and thus are not always recognized. Around 135 sand fly species have been identified in Bolivia (≈25% of Neotropical species), distributed in 21 genera, 14 subgenera, 17 series of species, and one group of species [2,3,4].

The genus Pintomyia Costa Lima, 1932 includes the subgenus Pintomyia Ortiz & Scorza, 1963 with eight species, and Pifanomyia Ortiz & Scorza, 1963 with 72 species. Most of the species of the subgenus Pifanomyia are distributed in the Andean region [2]. Within this subgenus, Pintomyia (Pifanomyia) nuneztovari anglesi Le Pont & Desjeux, 1984 [syn. Pintomyia (Pifanomyia) nuneztovari Ortiz, 1954] has been implicated in the transmission of zoonotic leishmaniasis in domestic environments in the sub-Andean area of Bolivia, as the proven vector of Leishmania amazonensis and a suspected vector of Leishmania braziliensis [1, 2]. This subgenus has been divided into seven series of sand fly species. Among them, the Evansi series Galati, 2003 comprises four species including Pintomyia (Pifanomyia) nevesi Damasceno & Arouck, 1956 [2], which is widely present in South America and is distributed from the foothills of the Andes mountains of Colombia, Ecuador, Peru, and Bolivia to the lowlands in the five Brazilian states of Para, Acre, Rondonia, Maranhao, and Mato Grosso [2]. In the past, this species was included in the Verrucarum group [3].

Pintomyia (Pif.) nevesi is a sylvatic species, originally described in 1956 from two male specimens collected in a station on the Capim River in the state of Para, Brazil [5]. Unfortunately, in the original description, some measurements were imprecise, making the morphological identification of specimens difficult and raising doubts as to their true identity.

Similarly, a few decades ago a female from a collection of 12 specimens from the sub-Andean foothills of La Paz, Bolivia, was identified as Pi. (Pif.) nevesi [6]. But lacking information on the males that were collected, and given the distance and difference in altitude compared with the type locality of Pi. (Pif.) nevesi in Brazil, the report from Bolivia raised controversy.

Later, Dujardin and Le Pont [7] examined the intraspecific variation in the traditional morphometric traits used for the identification of sand flies. The comparison of metric characteristics was carried out from 12 species from Bolivia between conspecific populations belonging to the same eco-region and between conspecific populations from different eco-regions. Unfortunately, when comparing the populations of Pi. (Pif.) nevesi from the sub-Andean and Amazonian regions, anomalies forced these specimens to be excluded from this study.

Afterwards, a molecular study was carried out by Beati et al. [8] to identify seven sand fly species from the Verrucarum group (sensu Young & Duncan, 1994) from Peru, where two females and one male Pi. (Pif.) nevesi from the sub-Andean region of San Martin, were included. However, the female specimens were eliminated from the study, due to significantly different sequences in comparison to clearly identified male Pi. (Pif.) nevesi.

Considering the dubious identity of sub-Andean Pi. (Pif.) nevesi from Bolivia and Peru, the identity of past Bolivian sand fly collections identified as Pi. (Pif.) nevesi was thoroughly revised. Based on the identification key of the species of the Evansi series [2], we provide both male and female descriptions of a new species close to Pi. (Pif.) nevesi and the taxonomic characteristics of the related species. Recently, the closely related species Pi. (Pif.) maranonensis [15] was identified naturally infected by Leishmania (Viannia) peruviana in the Eastern Andes of northern Peru [9], increasing the interest and importance of further studies of the Evansi series.


A large systematic entomological survey was conducted between January 1982 and February 1984 in a subtropical humid forest at the municipality of Palos Blancos, Sud Yungas Province, Department of La Paz, Bolivia (Alto Beni region). Phlebotomine sand flies were collected monthly for 26 months, at both the ground and canopy levels using Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) light traps and protected human bait. The latter procedure was privileged, considering the importance of the anthropophilic species as potential vectors of leishmaniasis. As expected, the captures using protected human bait were mainly females. As additional information, the male/female sex ratio collected with CDC light traps over 1 year in human environments was 0.58 for wood-wall houses and 0.77 for adobe-wall houses.

A total of 24,730 phlebotomine sand flies comprising 16 species were collected at the floor, and 3259 sand flies comprising eight species at the canopy. At the floor, Pi. (Pif.) veintemillasi represented 6.2% (1526 specimens) of anthropophilic species, ranking third only after Psychodopygus carrerai carrerai Barreto, 1946 (the proven vector of L. braziliensis) and Psychodopygus hirsutus hirsutus Mangabeira, 1942, without a known vectorial role in the transmission of leishmaniasis. At the canopy, Pi. (Pif.) veintemillasi represented the second most common anthropophilic species, with 35.1% (1027 specimens) of the captures, exceeded only by Pintomyia (Pifanomyia) serrana Damasceno & Arouck, 1949 [10]. The current description of Pi. (Pif.) veintemillasi as a new species is possible using the only available mounted biological material (collected in February 1982, using both capture procedures) of this important anthropophilic sand fly, which was previously misidentified as Pi. (Pif.) nevesi.

Both male and female individuals of the species of interest were initially sorted based on the similarity of the pleura pigmentation. Sand fly specimens were sorted using a dissecting microscope and placed in 70% ethanol. For species identification, sand flies were treated using the Abonnenc technique [11] and mounted in Euparal media. Ten to 12 specimens of each sex and its related species were used for the morphometric analysis. The measurements are given in millimeters (a = average). The classification, character nomenclature, genus, and subgenus name abbreviations follow Galati [2] and Galati et al. [12].

Although many specimens of this new species have been captured in the past, we only have available those from the collection, which serve for the present description. The others, misidentified as Pi. (Pif.) nevesi, were unfortunately discarded. However, we will program new captures for further studies including the similar species of the Evansi series, using molecular tools and geometric morphometry.


From morphological analysis and measurements of mounted specimens, previously labeled as Pi. (Pif.) nevesi, a new sand fly species was identified.

Family Psychodidae Newman, 1834

Genus Pintomyia Costa Lima, 1932

Subgenus ( Pifanomyia ) Ortiz & Scorza, 1963

Pintomyia (Pifanomyia) veintemillasi n. sp. Martinez, Leon, Mihalca, Dujardin & Le Pont (Figs. 1, 2).

Fig. 1
figure 1

Pintomyia (Pif.) veintemillasi n. sp. male. a Head frontal view; b antennomer fII; c cibarium and pharynx; d sternite 2; e genitalia profile; f paramere and aedeagus, in lateral view; g genital pump and genital filaments; h wing. Scales are in mm

Fig. 2
figure 2

Pintomyia (Pif.) veintemillasi n. sp. female. a head frontal view; b antennomer fII; c cibarium and pharynx; d cibarium; e laciniae of the maxillae; f sternite 2; g spermatheca; h rapid view of a complete genitalia; i wing. Scales are in mm

Type locality Marimonos station, in the Marimonos mountain range, Bolivia. Municipality of Palos Blancos (15°35′02″S–67°15′07″W), altitude 900 m, Sud Yungas province, Department of La Paz, Bolivia.

Type-material The male holotype and the female allotype are deposited in the Bolivian Fauna Collection (Colección Boliviana de Fauna, CBF), La Paz, Bolivia; 10 paratypes (five males and five females) are also deposited in CBF, La Paz, Bolivia; UPAMETROP/IINSAD (Unidad de Parasitología, Medicina Tropical y Medio Ambiente; Instituto de Investigación en Salud y Desarrollo), La Paz, Bolivia; MNHN (Museum National d’Histoire Naturelle), Paris, France.

ZooBank registration To comply with the regulations set out in Article 8.5 of the amended 2012 version of the International Code of Zoological Nomenclature (ICZN) [13], details of the new species have been submitted to ZooBank. The Life Science Identifier (LSID) of the article is The LSID for the new species Pintomyia (Pifanomyia) veintemillasi is

Etymology The species name is dedicated to Dr. Felix Veintemillas for his great contribution to the research and control of infectious and parasitic diseases in Bolivia, the main Bolivian reference on leishmaniasis in the mid-twentieth century.


Male holotype (Fig. 1). Sand fly of small size, generally gray in color, mesonotum and abdominal tergites light brown, measuring 2 mm from the tip of the labrum to the end of the gonocoxite.

Head (Fig. 1a). Length 0.298 (0.294–0.324) including the clypeus; maximum width 0.286 (0.284–0.321). Head length/head width ratio 1.04. Interocular distance 0.101 (0.85–0.101) equal to the diameter of 5.5 facets. Labrum-epipharynx (LE) length 0.192 (0.181–0.214) from the edge of the clypeus. Antennal flagellomeres: fI 0.171 (0.160–0.201), fII + fIII = 0.077 + 0.087. Ratio fI/LE = 0.89 (a = 0.91). Short ascoids, only visible on the first flagellomere. Third flagellomere without sensilla in rosette in the preapical region. Palpus: total length 0.591 (0.548–0.673), respective lengths of the palpomeres: P1 0.030 (0.025–0.039); P2 0.105 (0.102–0.127); P3 0.114 (0.108–0.125); P4 0.079 (0.077–0.095); P5 0.263 (0.202–0.311); palpal formula: 1–4−(2–3)−5 or 1–4−(3–2)−5. Cibarium armed with a row of tiny, sharp, slightly sclerotized teeth of irregular size, and an anterior, discontinuous row of dot-shaped denticles. Sclerotized arch complete, well chitinized; pigmented patch, triangular, striated, extending anteriorly. Narrow pharynx, length 0.140, maximum width 0.037, with posterior denticulate scales (Fig. 1c).

Thorax. Length 0.429. Unpigmented paratergite. Clear pleuras, except for the basal region of the katepisternum and katepimeron, slightly pigmented. Upper anepisternal bristles: 6 + 7 (from 5 to 10 per pleura) and proepimeral bristles: 2 + 4 (2–4 per pleura). Wings (Fig. 1h): length 1.385 (1.385–1.560), maximum width 0.405 (0.376–0.440). Length/width ratio 3.41. Wing indices: alpha 0.305 (0.289–0.361), beta 0.153 (0.136–0.174), gamma 0.202 (0.200–0.244), delta 0.099 (0.079–0.151); alpha/beta ratio 1.99 (a = 2.06). Leg lengths of the femur, tibia, and basitarsus, respectively: front legs 0.505–0.530–0.325; middle legs 0.549–0.660–0.420 and hind legs 0.580–0.815–0.490.

Abdomen. Length 1.097 including the gonocoxite. Tergal papillae present from third to seventh tergite. Second sternite with 7–9 bristles on each apical region. Gonocoxite: length 0.172 (0.172–0.193), maximum width 0.055, without perennial bristles. Gonostyle length 0.104 (0.100–0.114) bearing four strong spines: an apical spine, an upper external spine inserted in the distal third, and the spines inferior and internal implanted in mid-segment; presence of a fine spiniform, subterminal bristle. Paramere (Fig. 1f): length 0.150 (0.145–0.157), measured from the dorsal margin; rectangular base, then posteriorly finger-shaped, garnished with erect bristles, curved anteriorly. Aedeagus conical, well sclerotized, with the tip reaching the finger-shaped part of the paramere (Fig. 1f). Lateral lobe without perennial bristles, similar in size to that of the gonocoxite; length 0.177 (0.161–0.188); sub-median lamella, without particularities. Genital pump (GP) length 0.111 (0.100–0.119; a = 0.109); genital filaments (GF) with finely striated apical third, and smooth apex, length 0.434 (0.427–0.490; a = 0.448), duct/pump ratio GF/GP 3.90 (3.90–4.38; a = 4.12).

Female allotype (Fig. 2). Sand fly identical in coloration to that of the male, measuring 2.45 mm from the tip of the labrum to the end of the cerci.

Head (Fig. 2a). Length including clypeus 0.363 (0.337–0.363), maximum width 0.347 (0.325–0.348). Head length/head width ratio 1.04. Interocular distance 0.129 (0.108–0.129), equal to the diameter of six facets. Labrum-epipharynx length 0.296 (0.275–0.296) from edge of clypeus; maxillary laciniae (Fig. 2e): six external teeth and 23 internal. Antennas: length of flagellomeres, fI 0.178 (0.166–0.183), fII + fIII = 0.083 + 0.084; ratio fI / LE = 0.60 (a = 0.61). In fIII, absence of papilla in rosette in preapical region. Ascoids strong and short, well staggered, not reaching the apical third. Palpus: total length 0.771 (0.636–0.771). The palp segments measuring respectively: P1 0.039 (0.033–0.040); P2 0.149 (0.134–0.154); P3 0.146 (0.134–0.146); P4 0.102 (0.083–0.102); P5 0.335 (0.236–0.335). Palpal formula: 1–4−(2–3)−5, segments 2 and 3 subequal; Newstead’s sensilla not visible. Cibarium with four equidistant acute horizontal teeth of equal size; a row of 9–12 vertical teeth, and several lateral, dot shaped, grouped teeth (Fig. 2d). Very distinct sclerotized area, thickened anteriorly, triangular, narrowed at the level of the chitinous arch; this last, rounded and continuous from one edge of the cibarium to the other, surpassing it laterally (Fig. 2d). Pharynx (Fig. 2c): with the most posterior scales, denticulate; length 0.165, maximum width 0.070.

Thorax (Fig. 3b). Length 0.574. Pigmentation identical to that of the male. Upper anepisternal bristles: 7 + 11 (7–12 per pleura) and proepimeral bristles 5 + 6 (2–6 per pleura). Wings (Fig. 2i): length 1.760 (1.649–1.795), maximum width 0.525 (0.485–0.545); Length/width ratio 3.35. Wing indices: alpha 0.434 (0.410–0.491), beta 0.195 (0.187–0.224), gamma 0.310 (0.237–0.320), and delta 0.186 (0.175–0.227), alpha/beta ratio 2.22 (a = 2.16). Legs lengths of the femur, tibia, and basitarsus, respectively: front legs 0.660–0.630–0.375; middle legs 0.673–0.775–0.450 and hind legs 0.725–0.990–0.545.

Fig. 3
figure 3

Comparative representation showing the pigmentation of the thorax profile of females (scale is in mm): a Pi. (Pif.) maranonensis; b Pi. (Pif.) veintemillasi; c Pi. (Pif.) nevesi

Abdomen. Length 1.225. Second sternite with 8–10 bristles on each apical half. Spermatheca, like a pear-shaped sac, finely wrinkled transversely, head deeply invaginated in the spermatheca, with pluri-lobed apex (Table 2), fan-shaped (Fig. 2g). Importantly, the head is slightly offset from the axis of the spermatheca, and therefore most often emerges laterally after mounting (Fig. 2g). Common duct and individual ducts not measurable, but a long common duct presence.


Specimens of the new species Pi. (Pif.) veintemillasi were collected through entomological surveys carried out at both the ground and canopy levels using CDC light traps as well as protected human bait. Pintomyia (Pif.) veintemillasi, misidentified as Pi. (Pif.) nevesi, was the second most numerous anthropophilic species at the canopy level, only after Pi. (Pif.) serrana and the third most common anthropophilic on the ground, after Ps. carrerai carrerai (vector of Leishmania braziliensis) and Ps. hirsutus hirsutus (identified naturally infected by flagellates) [10, 14]. Two species of Pifanomyia were collected in sympatry [10, 14]; both presented similar size and a gray pigmentation: Pi. (Pif.) serrana (Serrana series) and Pi. (Pif.) nuneztovari Ortiz, 1954 (incertae sedis), syn. Pi. (Pif.) nuneztovari anglesi Le Pont & Desjeux 1984 [2].

Following Galati [2], the new species, Pi. (Pif.) veintemillasi, belongs to the subgenus Pifanomyia, Evansi series, according to the following morphological characteristics: palp P5 larger in length than P3 in both sexes, which is a relevant feature of the subgenus Pifanomyia; in the males, presence of short ascoids, reaching half of the segment, a strong four-spine gonostyle, and the presence of a preapical bristle; a gonocoxite without tuft, and a simple paramere; in the females, ascoids reaching the subapical region of the segment, a hypopharynx with deep apicolateral teeth, and a short row of external teeth for the maxillae; a cibarium with four horizontal teeth, the vertical teeth fitting into one or two transverse rows; a complete chitinous arch, and a narrow, triangular, pigmented area; spermatheca with a long common duct, vesicular body, without apical ring, transversely wrinkled, and well-individualized head. Finally, the absence of sensilla in rosette on the third flagellomer fIII in Pi. (Pif.) veintemillasi confirms it belongs to the Evansi series.

The morphologically similar species in this series are Pi. (Pif.) nevesi and Pi. (Pif.) maranonensis [15], noting the latter is only present on the Ecuador-Peru border. Pintomyia (Pif.) veintemillasi is different from Pi. (Pif.) nevesi based on larger size and pigmentation of the lower part of the pleura. Significantly shorter genital filaments in the new species shed light on the doubts about the criteria for identifying Pi. (Pif.) nevesi [6]: a genital filaments/genital pump (GF/GP) ratio = 4.12 (3.90–4.38) for Pi. (Pif.) veintemillasi, notably shorter than the ratio = 4.60 (4.44–4.86) established for Pi. (Pif.) nevesi and 4.73 (4.43–5.38) for Pi. (Pif.) maranonensis (Table 1). Additionally, the pigmented paratergite of (Pif.) maranonensis, in contrast to the clear paratergite of Pi. (Pif.) nevesi, differentiates the two species. The labrum-epipharynx of females is a good character for species distinction: Pi. (Pif.) veintemillasi 0.284 (0.275–0.296), Pi. (Pif.) nevesi 0.255 (0.233–0.266), Pi. (Pif.) maranonensis 0.346 (0.330–0.375) (Table 2). In the Pi. (Pif.) veintemillasi female (Table 2), the labrum-epipharynx is larger; the spermatheca has a purse-like shape and is finely wrinkled, with a multi-lobed head, opening out laterally, while in Pi. (Pif.) nevesi, it is oblong, with a fine head emerging at the apex. Pintomyia (Pif.) veintemillasi is only present in Bolivia in the forest regions of the sub-Andean cordillera (300–1400 m altitude) belonging to the wide basin of the high tributaries of the Amazon, whereas Pi. (Pif.) nevesi has been found far from this area in the lowland region.

Table 1 Male taxonomical characters between Pi. (Pif.) veintemillasi n. sp. and related species
Table 2 Female taxonomical characters between Pi. (Pif.) veintemillasi n. sp. and related species

The difference is more evident with Pi. (Pif.) maranonensis, which has a pigmented paratergite; the male has a tuft of bristles at the gonocoxite, and the GF/GP ratio = 4.73; the female of this species has a rounded spermatheca, with a head strongly invaginated to mid-body, and emerging laterally (Tables 1, 2).

A female of Pi. (Pif.) nevesi was identified by Velasco and Martins (1974) from the foothills of La Paz in Huacakarita (altitude 800 m), approximately 50 km from Marimonos in the sub-Andean region [5]. Its metric data correspond to Pi. (Pif.) veintemillasi, confirming the presence of a cryptic species that is distinct from Pi. (Pif.) nevesi.

As a final remark, in Bolivia, on the La Paz-Riberalta, Beni transect, Pi. (Pif.) veintemillasi and Pi. (Pif.) nevesi presented an allopatric distribution, confined respectively to the sub-Andean (300–1400 m) and the Amazonian regions (130–200 m), separated by 400 km of the Beni plain.

In Peru, in the region of San Martin, with a geographical configuration similar to that of the department of La Paz in Bolivia, Pi. (Pif.) veintemillasi could represent the species, similar to Pi. (Pif.) nevesi, reported by Beati et al. [8]. Taxonomical studies through more recent entomological collections should give light to the possible presence of this species in Peru and neighboring countries.

This morphological description was based on mounted biological material, without available specimens for molecular studies; nevertheless, further field surveys will be conducted in the sub-Andean region to collect specimens for molecular studies needed to complete the genetic identity of this new species in comparison with similar taxa.

Identification key for species of the subgenus Pifanomyia—Evansi series (updated from Galati, 2018)



Paramere with straight dorsal margin, completely covered by spiniform setae……………. 2

Paramere with dorsal margin slightly curved at the apex towards the gonocoxite, setae restricted to this apical area ………………………………………………………… Pi. (Pif.) ovallesi


Sperm pump c. 150 µm long; the pavilion’s diameter being larger than that of the sperm sac; aedeagal ducts c. 670 μm; parameres thick, the digitiform part’s width slightly smaller than that of the base and as long as the epandrial lobe ………………… Pi. (Pif.) evansi

Sperm pump c. 120 µm long; the pavilion’s diameter being smaller or equal to that of the sperm sac; aedeagal ducts c. ≤ 570 μm; parameres thinner, with the digitiform part’s width perceptibly narrower than its base and smaller than the epandrial lobe …………………… 3


Gonocoxite with tuft of two or more setae; thorax with paratergite brown ……………………. …….…………………………………………………………………..Pi. (Pif.) maranonensis

Gonocoxite without tuft of setae; thorax with paratergite straw…………………….………4


Pleura straw, relation aedeagal ducts /genital pump = 4.60 ………………… Pi. (Pif.) nevesi

Pleura partially pigmented, relation aedeagal ducts /genital pump = 4,12 ………………… .………………………………………………………………………Pi. (Pif.) veintemillasi



Spermatheca without apical ring ………………………………………………………………………….. 2

Spermatheca with apical ring ……………………………………………………………………………… 4


Labrum-epipharynx ≥ 330 μm; thorax with paratergite and mesonotum brown, contrasting with the straw pleura …………………………………………………………….. Pi. (Pif.) maranonensis

Labrum-epipharynx < 300 μm; thorax with paratergite straw ……………………………………………3


Labrum-epipharynx 275–296 μm; thorax with paratergite straw; pleura partially straw with brown pigmentation at the base (katepisternum and katepimeron)………………………. ………………………………………………………………………………….. Pi. (Pif.) veintemillasi

Labrum-epipharynx ≤ 270 μm; Thorax with paratergite and pleura straw……. Pi. (Pif.) nevesi


Spermatheca with a constriction in its apical half ………………………………. Pi. (Pif.) ovallesi

Spermatheca without constriction in its apical half ………………………… Pi. (Pif.) evansi


Pintomyia (Pif.) veintemillasi is described as a new sub-Andean sand fly that was for decades misidentified as Pi. (Pif.) nevesi from the Amazon lowlands, due to its similar morphology. The high anthropophily of this species could eventually be related to a vector role.

Availability of data and materials

The data that support the description are available from the corresponding author.


  1. Akhoundi M, Kuhls K, Cannet A, Votýpka J, Marty P, Delaunay P, et al. A historical overview of the classification, evolution, and dispersion of Leishmania parasites and sandflies. PLoS Negl Trop Dis. 2016;10:e0004349.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Galati EAB. Phlebotominae (Diptera, Psychodidae): classification, morphology and terminology of adults and identification of American taxa. In: Rangel E, Shaw J, editors. Brazilian Sand Flies. cham: Springer International Publishing; 2018. p. 9–212.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  3. Young DG, Duncan MA. Guide to the identification and geographic distribution of Lutzomyia sand flies in Mexico, the West Indies, Central and South America (Diptera: Psychodidae). Mem Am Entomol Inst. 1994;54:1–881.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Martinez E. Leishmaniasis en Bolivia. contribuciones científicas al conocimiento y a la prevención y control basados en evidencia [Tesis Doctoral]. [La Paz, Bolivia]: Universidad Nacional Siglo XX, Instituto Internacional de Integración—Convenio Andrés Bello, IIICAB; 2020.

  5. Damasceno RG, Arouck R. Estudos sobre flebotomus no vale Amazonico Parte VIII – Descriçao de F. pinottii, F. scaffi, e F. nevesi (Diptera-Psychodidae). Mimeograph paper presented at the XIII Congresso Brasileiro de Higiene, Fortaleza, décembre 1955. 1956; 1–17.

  6. Velasco J, Martins AV. Notas sôbre Lutzomyia nevesi (Damasceno & Arouck, 1956), com a descrição da femea (Diptera, Psychodidae, Phlebotomidae). Rev Bras Biol. 1974;34:93–7.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Dujardin J-P, Le Pont F. Geographic variation of metric properties within the neotropical sandflies. Infect Genet Evol. 2004;4:353–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Beati L, Cáceres AG, Lee JA, Munstermann LE. Systematic relationships among Lutzomyia sand flies (Diptera: Psychodidae) of Peru and Colombia based on the analysis of 12S and 28S ribosomal DNA sequences. Int J Parasitol. 2004;34:225–34.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Kato H, Seki C, Kubo M, Gonzales-Cornejo L, Caceres AG. Natural infections of Pintomyia verrucarum and Pintomyia maranonensis by Leishmania (Viannia) peruviana in the Eastern Andes of northern Peru. PLoS Negl Trop Dis. 2021;15:e0009352.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Le Pont F. Les phlébotomes et les leishmanioses en Bolivie [Thèse de Doctorat]. [Paris, France]: Université Paris-Sud; 1990.

  11. Floch H, Abonnenc E. Diptères phlébotomes de la Guyane et des Antilles françaises. Paris: ORSTOM; 1952. p. 1–207.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Galati EAB, Galvis-Ovallos F, Lawyer P, Léger N, Depaquit J. An illustrated guide for characters and terminology used in descriptions of Phlebotominae (Diptera, Psychodidae). Parasite. 2017;24:26.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. International Commission On Zoological Nomenclature. Amendment of articles 8, 9, 10, 21 and 78 of the international code of zoological nomenclature to expand and refne methods of publication. Zookeys. 2012;219:1–10.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Le Pont F, Mouchet J, Desjeux P. Distribution géographique et écologique des phlébotomes (Diptera: Psychodidae) anthropophiles de Bolivie, sur un transect Andes-Amazonie. Ann Soc Entomol Fr. 1990;26:159–71.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Galati EAB, Cáceres AG, Le Pont F. Descriçoes de duas especies novas de Phlebotominae (Diptera, Psychodidae) e consideraçoes sobre o subgenero Pifanomyia Ortiz & Scorza. Rev Bras Entomol. 1995;39:431–46.

    Google Scholar 

Download references


We are grateful to Dr. Ronald Andrade, past Director of INLASA (Instituto Nacional de Laboratorios de Salud) La Paz, to Dr. Sergio Mollinedo, past -Head of the Laboratory of Parasitology (INLASA), for helping during this investigation, to Romain Gaillard for the layout of the two plates of drawings and to Dr. William F. Waters for editing of the text. This work was supported by the Institut de Recherche pour le Développement (IRD) and the French Ministry of Foreign Affairs.


This work was funded and supported by the French Cooperation in Bolivia.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations



JPD, conceptualization, data analysis. EM, RL, FLP: entomological collections, species identification. EM, RL, ADM, FLP: wrote the paper. EM, RL, ADM, JPD, FLP: edited the manuscript. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Eddy Martinez.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate

Not applicable.

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver ( applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Martinez, E., Leon, R., Mihalca, A.D. et al. Morphological description of Pintomyia (Pifanomyia) veintemillasi n. sp., a new sand fly species from the sub-Andean region of Bolivia. Parasites Vectors 15, 327 (2022).

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: